Fazely.ppt
-
Upload
hondafanatics -
Category
Documents
-
view
192 -
download
0
Transcript of Fazely.ppt
η and π0 Decay to Two Neutrinos
Ali R. Fazely
Department of Physics
Southern University
Miami Conference, 2007
In collaboration with
Richard L. Imlay,
Samvel Ter-Antonyan,
Kevin Muhammad
Department of Physics
Southern University
• Do η orπ0 decay into two neutrinos?
• Standard Model: π0 → νν or η → νν is forbidden, except for massive neutrinos.
• The experimental search for such purely NC decays would shed light on the nature of neutrinos and weak processes.
Weak Current
• The π+ → e + + νe has a BR of
1.23 × 10-4 (pdg)
The helicity is broken due to the mass of the electron consistent with the V-A interaction.
πo → νν
Forbidden in V-A Interactionπo is 0- and vacuum is 0+
For massless neutrinos 0- → 0+ transition isallowed only if Pseudoscalar (P) is present
Same for η → νν
The rate for A and P
• The decay rate for A interaction is proportional to (1 - β ). For massless neutrinos β = 1 and the rate is zero.
• The decay rate for P interaction is proportional to (1+ β ). For massless neutrinos β = 1 and the rate is maximum.
The rate for A and P
• A-coupling:
BR = π → eνe/π → μνμ = (me/mμ)2[1/(1- mμ2/mπ
2)2] = 1.275×10-4
• P-coupling:
BR = π → eνe/π → μνμ = 1/(1- mμ2/mπ
2)2 = 5.5
Experimental results on η → νν andπ0 → νν
Z0
l-q-
q l+
Within the SM, the diagram is a simpleqq annihilation to lepton pairs through aZ0 propagator.
Decay Rate
82222 103/4 −×=απ πfGF
222/1222222 /)/41(4)(/)( ππνπν αππννπ mmmfmGall F −=→Γ→Γ
Arnellos, Marciano, Parsa, Nucl Phy B196 (1982)
2/122228 )/41(/103)(/)( πνπνπννπ mmmmall −×=→Γ→Γ −
Experimental Results
600 107.1)(/)( −×=→Γ→Γ allee πννπ
6106.1)(/)( −×=→Γ→Γ allηννπ µµ
600 101.2)(/)( −×=→Γ→Γ allπννπ ττ
700 107.2)(/)( −×=→Γ→Γ allπννπ
pdg, all at 90% CL
LSND
• Observation of a muon-like, beam-excess above 160 MeV in the LSND detector
• 8.7 ± 6.3 (stat) ± 2.4 (syst) beam-excess events (pdg)
• The possible Branching Ratio of is:
__0
µµ ννπ →
70__
0 10)(3.3)(6.44.6)(/)( −×±±≈→Γ→Γ syststatallπννπ µµ
LSND Results PRL 92, 4, 091801-1, hep-ex/0310060
π0 → ντντ
A 95% CL, upper limit of <18.2 MeV was set by the ALEPH Collaboration on ντ mass
from 3 and 5-prong τ decay. (Eu J Phys, 1998, pdg).
However,
(mτ/mπ)2 < 331.24/(134.9)2 ≈ 0.0182
π0 → ντντ
Therefore,
Γ(π0 → ντντ)/Γ(π0 → all) < 5.0 × 10-10,
assuming no exotic mechanisms!
A possible laboratory to set limits on the ντ
mass!
η → νν
4106)(
)( −×⟨→Γ
→Γall
invisible
ηη
(90%CL)
pdg, BES2 collaboration, 06Q PRL 97 202002
Photons, from π0 and η muons neutronsElectrons/positrons
Estimates for the BR of the Km3
Detectors, e.g. IceCube
• Dominant interaction inside the ice is:
• The signature is an electron or τ cascade event
XeOe +→+ τν τ ,16,
Primary FluxSolid and dashed lines are those of Gaisser & Honda,
(hep-ph/0203272 (2002)). Symbols are from spectra of Wiebel, Bierman & Meyer, Ast. And Astrophys. 330 (1998), used in our CORSIKA simulations
Atmospheric Neutrino Flux, CORSIKA
Detected Spectra
Branching Ratio vs. Energy,5-year run
Branching ratio vs. Years
Conclusions
• Limits can be set for the first time on η→νν with KM3 detectors
∀ π→νν limits would not be competitive with existing limits.
• Dedicated experiments can be designed to look for π→ντντ yielding limits on
the ντ mass as well as any possible P interaction.