CaritasCrisisReport_2013_GR:Mise en page 1

, , , ,

N

2014

A Caritas Report prepared by Social Justice IrelandAnn Leahy, Sen Healy, and Michelle Murphy

This publication is supported financially by the European Union Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity - PROGRESS. This programme is implemented bythe European Commission. It was established to financially support the implementation of the objectives of the European Union in the employment, social affairs andequal opportunities area, and thereby contribute to the achievement of the Europe 2020 Strategy goals in these fields. For more information see: http://ec.europa.eu/progress

Preface

This Crisis Monitoring Report is an in-depth analysis on how the crisis is addressed in selectedcountries and whether political and economic decisions may reduce or increase the impacton large impoverishing segments of the population.

The aim of this report is not only to analyse the crisis but also help policy and decision-makersat local, regional, national and European levels, as well as non-governmental organisations andthe church to find their ways of commitment to overcome the crisis. Our 2012 CrisisMonitoring Report was warmly welcomed by politicians; one Member of the EuropeanParliament said that The Caritas study will be invaluable for politicians, like myself, who careabout the impact of austerity on the most vulnerable; for those of us who wish to stand upfor ordinary people during debates and discussions on solutions to the debt crisis. We need tobe able to challenge the proponents of cuts, to argue for tax justice, and for better and morecaring policies.

The voices of children and families experiencing poverty are at the heart of Caritas Europa. Inone of our previous publications from 2013 we have called on to Listen to the voices ofChildren in Poverty! The 11 years old Constantine from Cyprus said that My parents cannotafford my school snack so the school has to provide for me. The 9 years old Bruno fromPortugal shared that My mother is unemployed because the company said that they had noother place for her work. She was sad and I know she cries about it. The current Report is notonly the message of Caritas Europa, but also the message of those people who are facing crisisday by day. This Report is also a message of our member organisations that made valuablecontributions to this publication.

Caritas Europa is convinced that any kind of policy and legal measures aiming to address theimpacts of the crisis shall be rooted in the promotion and protection of human dignity,advancement of the common good and the support of solidarity between all groups in society.Pope Francis tells us that the need to resolve the structural causes of poverty cannot bedelayed, not only for the pragmatic reason of its urgency for the good order of society, butbecause society needs to be cured of a sickness which is weakening and frustrating it, andwhich can only lead to new crises. (Evangelii Gaudium 202) I believe that this report is auseful tool to promote recovery in Europe and to avoid new crises.

My special thanks shall go to San Healy, director of Social Justice Ireland, and our team ofCaritas experts who tirelessly worked on this publication and without whom it would not havebeen possible to deliver our new Crisis Monitoring Report.

Jorge Nuo-MayerSecretary General

PHOT

O: N

IKOS

PIL

OS

1 | - 06 07

09

10

15

2 | : 18 19 19

21 21

22

/ 25

26

: 27

3 | Caritas 31

4 | 34 35 41 431. n 43

2. / 45

3. 47

48

- 50

1 25

2 26

3 % 36

4 , EU28 38

5 , 2012 38

6 39

1 10

2 , % 21

3 22

4 26

5 35

6 / % 36

7 % 36

-

1

PHOT

O: N

IKOS

PIL

OS

2013 Caritas Europa . : , , , , - ( Caritas Europa, 2013). - Caritas - . - - . .

. . . Caritas Europa - 27 . - .

, -, , , - . - - . Caritas , .

Dr Sen Healy, - .

- - , . . - - - , Caritas - , , , Caritas. policy makers , , .

- , , 2008.

- .

Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel , - (2009).Y

. , - . Stieglitz - 30 :

7T H E I M P A C T O F T H E E U R O P E A N C R I S I S C A R I T A S R E S P O N S E T O A U S T E R I T Y

,

(Stiglitz, 2009, .7).

Joseph Stiglitz (2009) , . . Stiglitz - - -, , , . (Stiglitz, 2013; 2013a; Moore, 2012). , - , . (Meadway, 2013).

- . , , , , .

- . , , .

, , , .

- , . - - , - . - . elite, 2009 - .

, - . . // , .

( -) (Ash & Pollin, 2013). , - - (Quiggin, 2011). , , - , (Quiggin, 2012). Quiggin - (2012,.233).

8 T H E I M P A C T O F T H E E U R O P E A N C R I S I S C A R I T A S R E S P O N S E T O A U S T E R I T Y

. euro - (Giddens,2013). - .

, (), - . - - .

- - 2012 . - , Eurozone - - (, 2013). , -, - .

2013 , , . , ( 100.000), , -, , .

2012, Euro Group - -

() . . - .

- - (Quiggin, 2011). :

5 - .

5 -

5 - - ( - . ).

- - . - .

, Stiglitz - . , - - , - - (2013; 2013). . - .

- ( - Sixpack ,


) - 3% - 0.5%1. 60% ( ). , - . , . - - . - 2007, - 3% GDP ( ).

Quiggin ( (Healy et al, 2013)):

.

(Quiggin 2012, .231).

, , - - (Healy et al, 2013). (- ) - . , , Joseph Stiglitz (Moore, 2012).

(Blythe, 2013). Mark Bly, - , (2013).

T H E I M P A C T O F T H E E U R O P E A N C R I S I S C A R I T A S R E S P O N S E T O A U S T E R I T Y10

2012 27 - 1. -

. - 2013.

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 f 2014 f

EU (27 ) 3.2 0.4 -4.5 2.1 1.6 -0.4 -0.1 1.4Euro (17 ) 3 0.4 -4.4 2 1.5 -0.6 -0.4 1.2

: Eurostat, 2013, tec00115. f=.

1

1 H . .

T H E I M P A C T O F T H E E U R O P E A N C R I S I S C A R I T A S R E S P O N S E T O A U S T E R I T Y 11

2013, - - 26.6 ( 11% -) 2013 ( , 2013). .

. - (23.5% 2013) - ( ,2013). - ( , 2013).

- ( - ) 25 54 . . (, 2013). - - . (Eurofound, 2012).

20.2 - 2012 (, 2013).

(2013). -. - -

/

(, 2013c). - ( -). (, 2013).

-, - - (Ball et al, 2013). . . - (15-20 ) (Dao & Lounginie, 2010). . 69 , - - (Ball et al, 2013). .

:5 2012 (.

) 11.6 4.9% - (, 2013),

5 2012 , , 2.5% -, (- , 2013),

5 ( 25) 2012 5.7 2013 ( , 2013),

5 40% ( 15-24)

2013 . 1.0% ( ) 27 0.7% ( ) (Eurostat, 2013n). ( 0.5%) ( ) 27.

2013 2016, 3.5% , 5-8% , 10% (EuroMemo Group, 2013).

2 : (Eurostat, tessi082).

3 . ( , 2013f)

4 ,

- ( - 2020, ) . 25% 2012, 27. - 124.4 , 4 (Eurostat, 2013).

( , 2013). - - 2011.

27 18 2009 ( 19.8%) 2012 21.4%(Eurostat, 2013q). . 2 2009 2012 ( 19.6% 22.3%) (Eurostat,2013r). ( , 2013).

- ( , 2013).

/

, - 3 - . - 2013 .( , 2013).

4 - ( 2010), - , . (, 2013).

- :

5 , - . 2008 ( , 2013) -

5 - (- , 2013, . 39),

5 , -

, ( , 2013),

5 (NEETS) , 13.2% (. 7.4million) 2012. ( -, 2013),

5 -

2011 153 , 1.2% ( , 2012),

5 (. ) 2012 . - ( ,2013).


(, 2013p),

5 , - , - . ( - , 2013, . 26),

5 - - . ( , 2013o). 2011 2012 27 9.4% (Eurostat, 2013v),

5 2009, 410,000 ( , 2013o),

5 2011 - - 12 . (Eurofound, 2012),

5 - . - - . ( ,2013). 5 14.3% 2009 17.5% 2012 (27) (Eurostat, 2013t),

5 2011 - ( ) - 46.7% ( , 2013).

, , ( , , ). - , - - (Frazer & Marlier, 2012). , . Eurobarometer 6 ( , 2012). . (2012).

- , (Stuckler & Basu, 2013). - - . editorial British Medical Journal - , , . (BMJ, 2013).

2013 - . , . (- , , 2013).

5 : Eurostat, 2013. [tessi082]

6 32% , 38% 40% ( , 2012,. 6)


7 . ( , 2013)

(2013). - - .

Eurofound - (Eurofound, 2012). - (Eurofound, 2012).

Eurobarometer - 50% 2008 31% 2013 (, 2013L). , :

:

.

(Leonard & Torreblanca, 2013). - .

, 69 . (Ball et al, 2013). .

- 12 - 7. - ( , 2013).

- Oxfam - . (Oxfam, 2013). - - . (IFRC, 2013).

(2012) ( 2010/2011, ) . -

. - - .


- - . 2010 ( Reinhart-Rogoff) - - . Reinhart-Rogoff - 90% . ( Herndon, Ash Pollin 2013) 90% +2.2% -0.1% Reinhart-Rogoff. 2000 2009, 90% / 30% 90%. :

. , ,

(Ash & Pollin, 2013).

. - - - (, 2012b). 1978-2009, - - , (Ball et al,2013). :

5 (1) 0.1 - ( 0.4%) , 0.9 -

( 3.4%) ,

5 (2) 0.8

5 (3) 0.5%.

(, - ) (Ballet al, 2013). . , , - , - .

, , , , ... (Degryse, Jepsen &Pochet, 2013). . Oxfam - - , 80 90, - . , . (2013b). Oxfam / .

. 2020 , . 2020



. 5 . Caritas Europa 2020 . ( - , , - ) - - , ( , 2013, .44). . - . - , 2020. - .

. 2014 . - 2014 2013 ( , 2013q). - -, - ( ,2013q).

- . 2020 - (- ) ( ,2013r). -

- 8.

- 2013. ( , 2013o). - , . - . -:

2020 ,

( , 2013o, .4)

- (2008) - . (2013).

. . - - 9 ( , 2013o). - - . Jose Manuel Barroso, 2012 :

8 Caritas Europa 2020 - 2020 (Caritas, , 2013)

9 , , , , , .


.

- . 2013, 2/3 (67%) 2008 ( , 2013L). - , , . de facto

- (Degryse, Jepsen & Pochet, 2013). Giddens - - . (2013). Giddenst: , (2013).

- - - - . Euro, - ( ), .

PHOT

O: C

ARIT

AS R

OMAN

IA

:

2

T H E E U R O P E A N C R I S I S A N D I T S H U M A N C O S T 19

(, , , -, , ). , . - , . - -, CaritasEuropa .

, , , 12 . 2008. , - : Caritas Europa, 2013, - : , -, , ( Caritas Europa, 2013).

- -, :

: (EU-SILC) . - 2012 2011 . - . - - .

: - . 2020 - . :

5 1. 60 % ( ) (Eurostat, t2020_50)10,

5 2. . 4 9 ( ). (Eurostat, t2020_50),

5 3.

, 0 59 ( 18-59) 20% . (Eurostat,t2020_50).

, - - . -. , . 2020, - - .

: - 2020, - , . - , . - - / . 40%, 50% 60% -. 60% - 2020. -

10 60% 2020. 40%, 50% 70%.


.

( ) - . , , . (, 2013a). .

-, .

. - ( , 2013a). .

: Eurostat, , . - Eurostat. / Eurostat .


, , . - - (, 2013). - -. (Menendez, 2012).

2000-2010 - 2007. 2. 2012 (156.9%) 27 (Eurostat, 2013j).

176% 2013 (, 2013b).

2009 . 2010 - , , - . 2012, . - . (,2013d). . (, 2013). .

2011, Economist : , .

(2010-2012)

- - ,11 , - 30% -

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 / E-27 -2.5 -1.5 -0.9 -2.4 -6.9 -6.5 -4.4 -4.0 -5.2 -5.7 -6.5 -9.8 -15.6 -10.7 -9.5 -10.0

E-27 62.8 61.6 59 62.3 74.6 80 82.5 85.3 100 106.1 107.4 112.9 129.7 148.3 170.3 156.9

: Eurostat, 2013d, 2013e: gov_dd_edpt1; tsdde410

2 , %

11 , . , , , , (, 2013d).


- (, 2013d). , . 2012 - (, 2013d, . 28,33).

- ( - ) . , .

3% - . 2012 -10%. 2. 4.5% 2016 (, 2013b).

2000 2007 4% (, 2013d). . - 2008 2008 (-0.2%). 2012 -6.4%. 3. 2013 . - (, 2013c). : .

2013, 5.3% / ( , 2013a).

2013 , . - - (ET).

. - . - , . .

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013f 2014f

E (27 ) 3.4 3.2 0.4 -4.5 2.1 1.6 -0.4 -0.1 1.4 5.5 3.5 -0.2 -3.1 -4.9 -7.1 -6.4 -4.2 0.6

: Eurostat, 2013a, tec00115. f=

3

- . -, , , - . (, 2013). H -

- . . 12 (, 2013cc).

12 4.6% (, 2013cc)


2010 - - Caritas Europa, 2013. , , ( ), - , -, , - , . - .

2012 13.5 . - -. , - ( ) 1.5% - 0.7% (,2013cc). (2010-2013) 11.1% 13 (, 2013d, . 23).

2012 - . ( ,2013). 2012 . - 2012 - ( ) , , - , , . (KG:DI, 2012). 2013 - (Hope, 2013).

:

:

5 10%

5 ( ) (. 4093/2012) ( , 2013),

5 2013 - 25,000 . 4,000 . 75%14

. 4,000 2013 15,000 2013-2014 (, 2013b, .15,, .83).

5 2012 . -

5 2013 4 2014

5

5

5 - (, 2013cc)

5 (, 2013).

5 2011 2013 (, 2013cc. , 2013)

5 (. 4172/2013) (Ernst& Young, 2013)

- 6 .

. - . - , - . - ( , 2013). - . -, . ( , 2013). - - ,

13 ( , ) 4% . 5.3% 1.8% 2013.

14 .


. - .

Eurostat 15 2009 2004 (Eurostat, 2013w). - 10% 2013 2012, 2012 2011 7.76% ( - , 2013). 22% (586 ) 25, 32% ( 510) 25 (, 2013cc). - 460 360 ( -, 2013).

7% 2013 1.5% 2014, 20% (2010-2014) (,2013b). -, 2013 27% (, 2013b).

( ) , . (- , 2013). voucher - / 45,000 - -. (, 2013b, ). - 50,000 . - Voucher - , 100,000 (, 2013b, ).

2013 (), (). - , , , - . (, 2013).

2014 , - ( ) -

/ (, 2013b,, , 2013cc).

2010 , . - (2013b). . (38%) ( 27 ) ( 2000 2010) (,2012, 5.6.1, 5.6.3). 12 - (, 2013). 800,000( , 2013a). , (2013).

(2013) - - (EO).

. (,2013b, ). , - (Seith, 2012). , (Seith, 2013) (s, 2013, . 27). - - (, 2013b,, 2013d). , . (Dempsey, 2013).

, - , . .

15 . [Eurostat, tec 00014].


3, - 2011 2012.

17.7% 2011 877,000 (Eurostat, 2012). 2012 24.3% 1.2 (Eurostat, 2013h). 2012, 24.3% ( 25%) 27 (10.4%)(Eurostat, 2013h).

2013 27.6% 2013 ( ) (Eurostat, 2013g). 16, . 26% 2014 (2013a).

- ( ), 49.6% 2011 59.3% 2012 (Eurostat, 2012, Eurostat, 2013h). 2012

(, 2013a).

( ) 2008 2012 - (, 2013c).

. 55% 2012 ( 4). ( , 2013a). - 2013 60% ( , 2013a, 26). ( 2013) ( , 2013a, P.19, 26). : ... ( , 2013, .35).

- ( , ) 11.7% 2008 20.3% 2012 ( -, 2013). 27 - ( 2012) ( , 2013a, 19).

, , (, 2013,. 26).

H , 2010- 2011 (- , 2013a).

75

70

65

60

55

50

45

40

(%)

28

, , 20-64

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

1

: Eurostat, 2013f. t2020_10

, , 2013 (-19.1%) ( ,2013a). 34 16, - (, 2013c).

3, - 2012 55.3% (-

/

20-64) 59.9% 2011. - 13.1 E28 (68.4%) (Eurostat, 2013f). 2013, (-6.5% -270,000 ) (% ), ( , 2013a,.13, 20). 2013 2.3% .

16 , , , .


. .(, 2013c).

2008 - - ( 2020) 28.1%. 2011, 31% ( 27 24.2%). - 2012 34.6% ( 4 ) (Eurostat,2013b). , 2012, - 3.7 , 392,000 (Eurostat, 2013b).

(), () (). .

2 2004 2012 ( ).

2014 (, 2013c).

3 2011 2012. 21.4% 23.1%, 28 Eurostat(Eurostat, 2013o). 2012 60% . 2012, 2817 . 3.

2.5 - 2012, 190,000 . 2009 387,000 .

- . - 18-24 50% 2008 ( 23%) 2012 (33.1%) (Eurostat, 2013q). - 38.1% 2009 44% 2011( , 2013).

. - . 1. 6,591 2011 5,708 2012. 883, 13% - 28 ( ) (Eurostat, 2013p).

- 2005, - 2010 (, 2013a).

- 4.3 2011

25

20

15

10

5

0

(%)

: , (%)

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

2

: Eurostat 2013o, t2020, 51, 52, 53

17 2011 , , .

(15-24)

2012 1,204,000 24.3% 59.3% 55.3%2011 877,000 17.7% 49.6% 44.4%

: Eurostat, 2012, Eurostat, 2013h, : Eurostat, 2013i: , 15-74

4


2012. 28 (Eurostat,2013o, t2020_53). , , , - . 4.

2011 2012 - - 27, -, . 5.

- (13.7%), , - 54.2% ( , 2013). - - .

, - 40% . 40% ( 60% ). 40% 2009. 2009 2012, 4 - . 2011 2012 2.4 (Eurostat, 2013u).

( 18) ( , ). 26.9% 2012, 21.4% 28 (Eurostat, 2013q). 2008 ( 23%) 4 . 18 2012, 34.8%, 27 ( 22.3%) - 2008 ( 18.7%) (Eurostat, 2013r).

, EE- 2009 - 1-15 . ( 1-15) 31%, 27 21% ( , 2013, .38). .

- , 10% (2013c).

- 65 28 2012 14.3% (Eurostat,2013s). . 2012 17.2%, 2.9 - . 2010 2011 2012 . 18.3%( 28) (15.9%). 25.5% 2009 29.4% 2012 (Eurostat, 2013t).

2012 15.1%, 2011 (Eurostat, 2013v). 15% , - . 28 ( ).

2009 2011. - - ( , 2013).

18 : (Eurostat, tessi082).

- . -

:

. - 28 2011 2012 ( EU28). - .


( ) - . . . .

. - - , (, 2013). - , , - - . ( - , 2013).

. - (, 2013, . 28).

, 35% ( 2013) ( - -) ( , 2013a, 34). 2013 - - ( , 2013a).

- 2010 2012, (Avram et al, 2013).

2009 19 2004(Eurostat, 2013w).

/ -/ (, 2013, . 37). (, 2013d, .2). ( ) 20% US$41,155 20% - US$7,317 (,2011). Eurostat ( 20 S80/S20) 2010 2011 7.1% ( 5.6 6.0) (Eurostat, 2013c,tsdsc260).

, 2007 2010, 10% 8% , - 4% (, 2013a). - 2010 2012 . 8% (Avramet al, 2013, .26). ( 2012) . . , ( 20% )(Sutherland & Matsaganis, 2011; Callan et al, 2011).

- , -. - (,2013, .26). - ( , 2013).

- 2013 ,

19 . [Eurostat, tec 00014]20 20% 20%

( , 2013, . 43). (Eurostat, 2013c, tsdsc260)


, (2013). . , - . - .

- . - - - (GYAAD 2013). ( 2011 - ) - 2013 (Reuters, 2013), (2012, .3). - , . . ( HIV) .

10%, 21% 2008 2011 . , , - ( , , 2013).

(2013) -

. - - - , . - .

- . . - , - 25% 2009 - 20,000 (, 2013). (Caritas, 2013). - (2013c).

- . ( , 25 29 ) UNICEF (UNICEF, 2013). 2011, - -, -. , - ( ) , (2012). - (Muiznieks,2013).

- . - . 2012 154 . - (,2013). -


2013 - .

2011/2012 ( 20%) (Eurofound, 2012). , , 84% 85%,.

(Better Life Index) , 36 (OECD, 2011/2013). 2,032 , - (1776 ) (2011/2013). 21 . .

- (2013). - , 2010 ( 2010-2012) (, 2013d)., - . , - , - . .

M. 1991. . 1991 . . . . . , . , . ... . 4 5 ( 40 ) . supermarket . . . . . . . . ( ) 100 . . , . . ... . . .

.

21 (, 2011)

C A R I TA S

3


Caritas Europa - , -. , - (advocacy), . -, .

. - , - - .

, . , - -. . - .

- Caritas Europa - Caritas Europa, . Caritas Europa, Caritas Caritas Internationalis ( -, , , , , ). - , -, , .

- . :5 , ,

,5

, , 5

, ,,

5

5 , ,

5

, , .

, , , .

Caritas - , , -, , . - . :5 300-320 60-80 ,

/ ( )

5

5 (, , , , ,, ..)

5 (, ) ,

5

Caritas -, , CRS Caritas Europa. - 230 - . . - .

SEECEG (South East Europe Caritas Emergency Group Caritas ) - (, , -


. . . , . 47 . . , . , , , , . , . .

, , . , , . . , . .

..

, , ). - .

:

Caritas - . - ., , , - - .


, 2008 , . 2007 , , , 3,2%. . 23. 2012, ( ) 27 -0,4%.

24 , 2007 , 3% -. 3%( -3,1%).

3% 2007 -6,5%, -0,9%.

- - .

, , . :

5 - , , , , , - .

5 (Avram et al, 2013)

. , , .

5 - 2013 Caritas ( ) - , , , -, .

, , , , .

2007 2012 2013 f

EE (27 ) 3.2 -0.4 -0.1 5.1 -2.4 -8.7 3.5 -6.4 -4.2 5.4 0.9 1.1 1.7 -2.4 -1.3 2.4 -3.2 -2.3 6.3 0.7 1.6 3.5 -1.4 -1.5

: Eurostat, 2013a, tec00115: . f= (forecast)

5


, 2007. , , - . . 25 15.

68,4%, - 27 (59%) , -, 100%.

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

EE (27 ) -2.5 -1.5 -0.9 -2.4 -6.9 -6.5 -4.4 -4.0 -2.4 -1.2 3.5 0.9 -6.1 -5.3 -6.3 -6.3 -5.2 -5.7 -6.5 -9.8 -15.6 -10.7 -9.5 -10.0 1.7 2.9 0.1 -7.4 -13.9 -30.8 -13.4 -7.6 -4.4 -3.4 -1.6 -2.7 -5.5 -4.5 -3.8 -3.0 -6.5 -4.6 -3.1 -3.6 -10.2 -9.8 -4.4 -6.4 -1.2 -2.2 -2.9 -5.7 -9.0 -6.8 -5.6 -2.9 1.3 2.4 1.9 -4.5 -11.2 -9.7 -9.4 -10.6: Eurostat, 2013d, gov_dd_edpt1

6 / %

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

EE (27 ) 62.8 61.6 59 62.3 74.6 80 82.5 85.3 69.4 64.7 58.8 48.9 58.5 61.3 71.1 85.8 100 106.1 107.4 112.9 129.7 148.3 170.3 156.9 27.3 24.6 25.1 44.5 64.8 92.1 106.4 117.6 105.7 106.3 103.3 106.1 116.4 119.3 120.8 127 67.7 69.4 68.4 71.7 83.7 94 108.3 123.6 15.8 12.4 12.8 13.4 23.6 30.5 34.7 37.8 43.2 39.7 36.3 40.2 53.9 61.5 69.3 84.2

: Eurostat, 2013e, tsdde410

7 %

2008 . 2009 6,1%.

2012, 3%

. 2008. , 2010 31% -. , 2012 10,6% .

2012, (-, , ) 100% . , 2011 2012 , 160% . 2011 2012 , 27 (Eurostat, 2012j).

15, 60% ( - ). - 60% .

EU-27

Cyprus

Greece

Ireland

Italy

Portugal

Romania

Spain

2007

0 20 6040 80 100 120 140 160 180

3 %

2011 2012

: Eurostat, 2013e, tsdde410 60% .

% GDP


. , 27 60% 2008. 24.

2008, (3% ) 22. , .

2008. , - , , . 3% 0,5%23. , - 60% / , ( ). -, , .

, , .

(Quiggin 2011).

- - , (Ball et al, 2013). - . , - ( - ) - .

34 24 ( 18%) - , , (5-10%). , , - (OECD, 2013c).

2013 - : (-6.5%), (-5.2%), (-4.8%) (-4.3%). (-1.4%)

22 -3.1%, , .23 ,

.24 , , , , .

(1.1%) ( ,2013a, 20). , , .

, , 28 2013. . . 28 16 6.


- (3% ) ( 1 , 2013) ( , 2013a, 20), , 2011 2012 ( EU, 2013b). , , .

( 25) 27 , 17. 30% , , -, 27. 50% 27. ( 2013) - , , , - ( , 2013a, 19, 26). 60% 2013 ( , 2013a, 26).

( -, 2013a). , - , (Social ProtectionCommittee, 2013a).

NEET (, , ) 27. 2012 (4 ) 27 , , , , (- , 2013a, 19). - 10 27.

- 2014 , , , (, 2013c).

2010-2011 - (, ) , , ( , 2013a).

. 2012

Allemagne

Autriche

Pays-Bas

Danemark

Malte

Luxembourg

Finlande

Rpublique tchque

Belgique

Slovnie

Estonie

Royaume-Uni

Roumanie

UE (28 pays)

Sude

France

Lituanie

Pologne

Chypre

Bulgarie

Hongrie

Lettonie

Irlande

Slovaquie

Italie

Portugal

Croatie

Espagne

Grce

0 10 3020 40 50 60%

5 , 2012

: Eurostat, 2013i. tsdec460.

Autriche

Allemagne

Luxembourg

Malte

Danemark

Rpublique tchque

Pays-Bas

Roumanie

Royaume-Uni

Sude

Estonie

Finlande

Belgique

Hongrie

Pologne

UE (28 pays)

France

Slovnie

Lituanie

Italie

Lettonie

Bulgarie

Irlande

Slovaquie

Croatie

Chypre

Portugal

Espagne

Grce

0 5 1510 20 25 30%

4 , EU28

: Eurostat 2013g, [une_rt_m] . , , , : ,:


, . - . 2012 6 , . - 2011 2010. .

18 ( - 2020) 2011 2012 - . 2011 2012 - , .

/

2007 2012. - Eurostat 2012 2007 2011. 27 2012 ( 2011 ). 2.

3 - - . ( 2020 2010), ( ).

- . - 28 2011 2012 ( Eurostat ) (23.1%). . - 23 (, -, , ). 20 8 (, , -, , , , , ) 3 7.

- ( 2005) 2010 - . , , 25.

EU27 Av

Portugal

Cyprus

Spain

Ireland

Italy

Greece

Romania

2007

0 5 1510 20 25 30 35 40 45 50%

6

2011 2012

: Eurostat, 2013b. : 2012 ( 2013)

25 .

60% (61.7%) (59.3%). . 50% (53%) 40% (48.7%), (45.3%) (44.5%). , , 30,1%, 2011.

( ) - ( 2008 2012): (2 pps), (3pps), (2pps) - (5pps) . , (, 2013c).


- 28. , 28 ( ). 28 , 4. 28 ( ) 2011 2012. 2010 2011 ( - Eurostat) (Eurostat, 2013o).

- 28. - 26, , (Eurostat, 2013o) 5.

- - . (, , )(Eurostat, 2013q). . , , , 2012. - , - ( / -) (Eurostat, 2013q; 2013r).

- , , , - - (Muiznieks,2013).

- (- 18-24). 2008-2011, 60% 2007-2012 50% 2008-2012(Eurostat, 2013q).

, - 40% 2008, . (, , , ).

- 28 2012 : ,, (Eurostat, 2013v).

, - ( S80/S20 27), , (2010-2011), (2008-2011), (2009-2010) - ( 2008-2011) (Eurostat, 2013c,tsdsc260).

( 25%) 2013 ( , ) ( , 2013a).

33 28, 21 2007-2010 10% - 10%. , , . , , 10% , 10% 2010 2007(OECD, 2013a). .

26 2011 2012.27 20% 20%

( , 2013, 43). (Eurostat, 2013c, tsdsc260).

28


,, - . 8 , - Sean Healy, - (Social Justice Ireland), -.

2008 - , . , , , - . - ,

- (2013). Caritas , , , - . . , , -

(Eurofound, 2012). - - (IFRC, 2013).

2010 2012 - , , , , , (- , International Labour Organization,2013).

- (Legido-Quigly et al). , , (BMJ, 2013). - (2012) - , , .

(, , , , ) 27 2000 2010 (OECD,2012 5.6.3). (2012) , - , - .


2020. - , , , .

, -, .

1) -. -, -. . - (, - / ) -, , -, .

2) : (, , ), ( ) - ( ). - ( -, 2013a). , , , . , : -. ( ) - .

2011 - - .29

, . . - 2008 - .

3) . - ( 2012) - - . , - - ( , ). - . . - , - .

4) , - . - , - . , , 2008. - , , . , .

- -, .

29 (2011/2052(INI)).


, ( ). .

1. : - 2020 - . :

5 i. 20 , 2020

5 ii. - - ( ) 2020

5 iii. ( , -

1.

, , , - )

5 iv. ( (2) ) - (Annual GrowthSurveys) 2020, , , , (Social InvestmentPackage), ( - )

5) - , . - (, 2013n). - -. :

5 2020, ,

5 -,

5

- - & 2020. , , , , .


5 v. ( - - ), - Eurostat .

2. - : , , . - (1) - , (2) , - , (3) , - -. , ( )

3. : - - - - . 2020, , , - //.

4. //: - ( - ) . - . ,

.

5. : - - .

6. : - . - .

7. : - . 2013 - . - 2020 ( 1,2 3 ). - .

8. - - : 2013 , - , . , (6 ) . (ILO) 21 (2012) . , , - -30. - - . , -

30 (European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions) 153 2011, , 1,2% (2012).


, - .

1) : - . - - . - . , , , - .

2. /

2) : - , - . - . - . - .

3) :

31 , , , (International Labour Organization, 2007, .4)

31 . - -, . , - ( ) ( -, - ). , , , . - .

9. - : - ( - ) , 2013.

- . - 2020.

10. : - , - .

11. : - , , 2020 - ( 1, 2 3 ). - . - (Shared Social Responsibilities) - - , - .


. - - (2013a). - - .

4) : (, , , , - ) , . - . , - , , - . , - , . - , - .

5) : : - , , - . (Frazer & Marlier, 2012). , . - - , , . , , , - , . - .

6) : ( -, , ) - . ( / ) - . , , .

7) : ( ) . - , , .

8) -// , , , , -, - : , , 1930. . , - , , - : , -, , - . , -. -. ( , ). - - . - . , .


1) : . . - - . - , .

2) - : , -

3) : - - . - . , -

3.

, . - - .

4) - : . . , . . - - , , - . - 8 .5) : -

32 , , 20% ( , 2013o).

9) : - . - . - .

10) : - .

11) : - . - .

12) - , 2014-2020, ( ), ( )32 - , FEAD (Fund forEuropean Aid to the Most Deprived) , - - , , ( , 2013o).


. , . ,

. - , - .

CaritasEuropa, , , . - - , , (Sollicitudo ReiSocialis 31). - , , - (Caritas in Veritate 31). - XVI, , Caritas ( , ) (Deus Caritas Est 31a). Caritas Europa , 27 , .

Caritas - , , . , . Caritas .

. - .

1) , , : . - . , XVI , (Caritasin Veritate 30). (Deus Caritas Est 30b).

2) : -. - (Gaudium et Spes 63).


. . - . , - .

3) : . . , (Gaudium et Spes 74). , , - . - . . - .

4) : XVI - (Caritas in Veritate 38). . - - . - - - (Evangelii Gaudium 188/189). -

- . , , , -, , , -, , . - .

5) , - , , : - (EvangeliiGaudium 58). . . . - - , -. - - .

6) - , - : . - - . .


JosephStiglitz 2008, , -. Stiglitz . , . - .

, - .

( - ) , , -. - - , .

- , - , (, 2008). - ( 137(1) (h)). - - - .

2020, 2010, , -, (, 2010). , - - ,

-. - , , .

2013 , ( ,2013). - , , -, , - , - - - .

- . Sen Healy, , (Social Justice Ireland)


. , -, , -, . - (Independent Network of Experts on Social Inclusion) - - - , (Frazer& Marlier, 2012).

- . - , - . : - , . , -.

- .

(2013n). - ,, .

2008 ( - ). - :

(1) - ,

(2) - ....[] , - -

(3) - - - ( , 2008)

. - , ( , 2008)

- - , , - ( -) , ,

, (2008). , .

- ,


. - , (Frazer &Marlier, 2009). - - (scare or motivation), , (Abrahamson, 2010). Abrahamson (2010), , , . - - , .

, . , (ILO) , , , (EP, 2011).

, 1970 - . - , , , , , - , (CofFEE, n.d.). , , , (CofFEE, n.d.).

, , . -

, , .

, - . / . - - .

- , ,33 - , -, , , ,34 (Greenham et al, 2011). Caritas Europa - - , , - (Caritas Europa, 2010) - (International LabourOrganization):

, , ,

(Internationale Arbeitsorganisation, 2007, p.4)

, - , -. - (trickle-down effect), , -, ;

33 (Greenham et al, 2011).34 ,

(Greenham et al, 2011).


. - , , . , , . , .

1) , ., , - . -, , , , . , - () - - .

, , , , -. / . - +/-830 100 ( , 2012a).35 ( -) .

2) , . -

. , . , . - .

, Newcastle. - 77% - . , 36(CofFEE, n.d.). 37. - (CofFEE, n.d.).

- - . - ( , , , ), - , , (CofFEE,n.d.).

- - . . - -. . ,

35 2005, , 21% (Coote et al, 2010).

36 , , , 2000, , , .

37 , Social Justice Ireland , .


, () (Caritas Europa, 2012).

- 2013, - 25 - - . , , - -, , , . - .

3) - .

-, 21 , , , (Coote et al,2010), - (), , -, , , , . - , , . , - . -

.

4) - , . - . . . - - . , 2008.

. , - - , :

( ). - . , , , , . - - , - .

- , , , , .


- (2008). - . - - - (Frazer & Marlier, 2009). - - .

, -, , , (OECD, 2013c). (ILO) - - , (2013a).

. , - . - .

1) , . - - (2012). ( ,2012).

- . //38 - .

(Decent WorkAgenda) - (2013a). - -. - (ILO, 2013a).

- .

, . ( ) -.

(ILO,2013a). , ILO .

. .

2) : - -

38 (International Labour Organization) , ILO (2013, 28, 36).


. - , ( ) - . - . - , , (Frazer & Marlier, 2009). - -, (Frazer &Marlier, 2009).

( ) ( ) - , , - . , , , (Frazer & Marlier,2009). , , .

. , - , - - (Frazer & Marlier, 2009). , - ( 25) (Frazer & Marlier, 2009).

2011 - .39

- 2009 - - 2008 - . - - , . - - .

, - . - (2013n). 40 - . , - , - . , - - .

3) . . ,

39 (2011/2052(INI)). , 60% .

40 , 18/10/2013: , . Bertelsmann Stiftung, .


(Parijs, 2000). , , - - . ( ) ( ). ( , ).

. , , (Basic Income EarthNetwork) : - .

- (Healy etal, 2013). ( (Basic Income Earth Network)(n.d.) :

. :

a.

b.

c. ,

, -. (Healy et al,2013).

- , , -, (Parijs,2000). , - , ( ). , -, , , -.

, - . - , (Healy et al,2013)

, , . . - - . - , - . .`

- . - .

- . 2012 123 (Garcia and Moore, 2012).

, . , , .


, , , , ( , 2008). : -, . , , - . , , (NESF, 2006).

- . , , , . , - , , . , , .

, - Rawls - . (capability approach) Amartya Sen (1999) MarthaNussbaum (2011). - Anton Hemerijck (2013).

, (freedom from want) (freedom to act) - - .

, , . - , , . , ( , 2013o).

ex ante , - - (2013o). , , - , ( - ) - . , , ( ) - (Frazer & Marlier, 2009).

- - , - ( , 2002). - , (Healy et al, 2012).

,

, - , - . .


- , - 41 (Abrahamson, 2010). - , ( 1950 1970) - -. (productivist) (Taylor-Gooby,2008). , , - , , , (Taylor-Gooby, 2008). (Abrahamson, 2010).

- :

; . , - - . , , - . - , . . , - . . - . - - .

; . -

( ). - , -:5 ,5

, 5

, , , (Abrahamson, 2010).

, , , (2013o).

; . Moore, (1995). :5 , ,

5 5

5

(NESF, 2006).

, . (, ), , , (, ).

41 . , : - , , , ( ) (Abrahamson, 2010).


, . - . , - . , - , .

- 150 ( ) ( ). , - - , . - .

- , . , . -, Held - , (2006, p.279/280).

. - . - - . - - (Leonard &Torreblanca, 2013).

- (deliberative democracy), (Held, 2006). - , - . - , :

, - , , , -, , , - (Held, 2006).

2020 - -. - . , . , , - , ( , 2011). -. - . . - .

, , , ( -) ( , 2011).


, , - Ellen McArthur. (regenerative) , - . , - . , , , , , - .

, , , - (, , , ). - , - - (Coote & Franklin, 2009).

- .

Acknowledgements This report was prepared by Social Justice Ireland in close cooperation with Caritas Europa andseveral Caritas member organisations. Social Justice Ireland wishes to specially acknowledge theassistance it received from Caritas Europa member organisations in preparation of this study,based on the Trojan work they are doing in their countries in responding to this current crisis.

The findings in the report are the result of research and analysis by experts in seven EU MemberStates most-affected by the crisis; Cyprus, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Romania and Spain.

The reports findings are grounded not only in empirical research but more importantly in thepractical, unique, grass-root work carried out by Caritas member organisations in the sevencountries.

Largest contributions to this report were made by:

Social Justice IrelandAnn Leahy, San Healy, Michelle Murphy

Caritas CyprusMichael Hadjiroussos

Caritas GreeceEvelyn Karastamati

Caritas ItalyWalter Nanni

Caritas PortugalJoo Pereira

Caritas RomaniaDoina Crangasu

Caritas SpainFrancisco Lorenzo

Caritas EuropaJorge Nuo Mayer, Peter Verhaeghe, Artur Benedyktowicz, Thorfinnur Omarsson

Caritas Europa

Rue de Pascale, 41040 Brussels - BelgiumTel. +32 (0)2 280 02 80Fax +32 (0)2 230 16 58

[email protected]

desi

gn :

beltz

a -

chiq

ui@

beltz

a.be

CaritasCrisisReport_2013_GR:Mise en page 1

Documents

Transcript of CaritasCrisisReport_2013_GR:Mise en page 1