Apotelesmatiki_didaskalia_mesis

36
Αποτελεσματική διδασκαλία και μάθηση σε τάξεις μικτής ικανότητας Ομάδα εργασίας: Γεωργίου-Ιωάννου Σοφία Γεωργούδης Ανδρέας Γιάννακας Πολύκαρπος Ερωτοκρίτου-Σταύρου Θεούλα Μακρυγιάννη Χαρά Ορφανίδης Γιώργος Παλλαρή Ανδρεανή Παντελή Παντελής Παντζιαρά Μαριλένα Παπαγεωργίου Ελένη Παπαδοπούλου Λιάνα Παπαλεοντίου Μαρία Παπασολομώντος Χριστίνα Παρασκευά Έλενα Πολυδώρου-Οδυσσέως Ζωή Στυλιανού Αρετή Συμεού Σίμος Φωκαΐδου Μαριάννα Χατζηθεοδούλου-Λοϊζίδου Παυλίνα Γλωσσική επιμέλεια: Μαρία Παπαλεοντίου

description

paidagwgiko instituto

Transcript of Apotelesmatiki_didaskalia_mesis

: -

-

- - :

.

.

3.

5.

6.

10

11

15

17.

20. 1 , :

.2 :

. , :

(.. , , , ) (.. ) (.. , ).3 3.1

-

,

, : , ( , ).3.2

- .4 , , , . , :

,

, . (. . 15-18). , .

. - - .

- . , , .

, - . (. , . 10), , (Kyriakides et al., 2009). , (Brophy & Good, 1986; Teddlie & Reynolds, 2000). , (.. Kyriakides et al., 2009). , . , - (. . 15 -18), , .

.

, .

Kyriakides et al. (2009) (. , . 10). (. . 11-14) . , (. . 15-18).

1. (Orientation)2. (Structuring)3. (Application) 4. (Questioning)5. (Modelling)6. (Management of time)

7. (Classroom as a learning environment)8. (Assessment). , , .

, :

. , , . , : , ..: , , ) , ) , ) , ) .

:

. , , .() -

i. ( .. -, , , , , , / .).

ii. / (.. , , , , ..).() / ,

i. / / (.. , project, , , / , ..).ii. ( / , : .. , , , , / .).iii. ( , , ).

iv. / ( , , , , ).v. (.. , , ..).vi. - ( , ).()

i. .ii. / .

.

1.

(Kyriakides et al., 2009)

2. ( )

, , . , , (. . 15-18). . , . , , , (Anderman et al., 2002). , . , .

. : ) , ) , ) ) . , . , , . , , .

. (Borich, 1992). , , , . , - .

, , , , .

. , , . , . , , ( ). , (Creemers & Kyriakides, 2006; Muijs & Reynolds, 2005).

. , . : ) ( ), ) , , ) (Creemers & Kyriakides, 2006). , . (higher order thinking skills). , , (Blumenfeld, 1992; Anderman et al., 2000).

, , . , .. .

, . , .

. , o (Creemers, 2002). , . , (Creemers & Kyriakides, 2006; Muijs & Reynolds, 2005). : ) - , ) - , ) , ) ) (Creemers & Kyriakides, 2006). , , . , , . , , .

, , , . , .

, . ( , , , ). , (Muijs & Reynolds, 2005).

, .. , . (Muijs & Reynolds, 2005). 3.

3.1 : ............................................................................................... : .............................................................................................................: ........................................................................................................................................ : ................................................................................ . .

(, )

:

, .

:

, ..:

.

, :

/ , (.. ) .

:

, ( ) .

(, )

:

( ).

:

, .

:

( )

-

( ).

:

( ) .

: ;

;

;

;

( /);

3.2 : ............................................................................................... : .............................................................................................................: ........................................................................................................................................ : ................................................................................ . . .

:

, .

:

, ..:

.

, :

/ , (.. ) .

:

, ( ) .

:

( ).

:

, .

:

( )

-

( ).

:

( ) .

: ;

;

;

; , ( /);

. -

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of educational Psychology, 84, 261271.Anderman, L., Patrick, H., Hruda L., & Linnenbrink, E. (2002). Observing Classroom Goal structures to Clarify and Expand Goal Theory. n C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, Goal structures, and Patterns of Adaptive Learning (pp. 243-278). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Blumenfeld, P. (1992a). Classroom Learning and motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 272-281.Blumenfeld, P. (1992b). The task and the teacher: Enhancing student thoughtfulness in science. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching, Volume 3 (pp 81-114). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Creemers, B.P.M. & Kyriakides, L. (2006). Critical Analysis of the Current Approaches to Modeling Educational Effectiveness: The importance of establishing a dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 347-366.Kagan, S. (1999). Cooperative Learning. (13th edition). N.Y: Resources For Teachers.

Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B.P.M., Antoniou, P. (2009). Teacher behaviour and students outcomes: Suggestions for research on teacher training and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (1), 12-23.

Muijs, J. & Reynolds, D. (2001). Effective Teaching. Sage Publications.Turner, J., Meyer, D., Anderman, E., Midgley, C., Gheen, M., Yongjin, K. & Patrick, H. (2002). The classroom environment and students reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study, Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 8810.

, . (1992). . .

, . (2001). - - - . . .& . (2002). . : .

, .. (2004). . .

. & . (2000). . : .

, . (2004). , , . .European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction: http://www.earli.org/ University of Toronto: http://www.tss.uoguelph.ca/id/ta/tahb/tah8g.htmlOffice of Curriculum Development and Management: http://www.uab.edu/uasomume/cdm/teaching.htmhttp://www.uab.edu/uasomume/cdm/teaching.htm

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved, 2007 http://www.ascd.orgCampbell, R., Kyriakides, L., & Muijs, R. & Robinson, W. (2003). Differential Teacher Effectiveness: towards a model for research and teacher appraisal. Oxford Review of Education, 29(3), 347-362.Carolan, J., & Guinn, A. (2007). Differentiation: Lessons. Educational Leadership, 44-47.Hall, T., Strangman, N., & Meyer, A. (2003). Differentiated Instruction and Implications for UDL Implementation. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved July 9, 2004 from: http://www.k8accesscenter.org/training_resources/udl/diffinstruction.aspMevarech, Z.R. and Kramaski, B. (1997). IMPROVE: A Multidimensional Method for Teaching Mathematics in Heterogeneous Classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 365 394.

Reis, S. & Renzulli, J. (1992). Using curriculum compacting to challenge the above average. Educational Leadership, 50(2), 51-57.Stradling R. & Saunders, L. (1993). Differentiation in practice: responding to the needs of all pupils. Educational Research, 35(2), 127-137.Tomlinson, C.A. (1999). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD

. (2007). . : 8 ... . . - , . (2006). - . . . . . . . & . (2006). . , 42, 160-177.

Tomlinson, C.A. (2003). . . . -. .

Tomlison, C. A. & Allan S. D. (2004). . . . .

, . (1999). . : . ASCD For the Success of Each Learner:

http://www.ascd.org/portal/site/ascd/menuitem.3adeebc6736780dddeb3ffdb62108a0c/ The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: http://www.learnnc.org/lp/pages/4047 . , . .

http://www.kleidiakaiantikleidia.net/book26/book26.pdf

Mevarech, Z.R. and Kramaski, B. (1997). IMPROVE: A Multidimensional Method for Teaching Mathematics in Heterogeneous Classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 365 394.Perfect T.J. and Schwartz B.L. (ed) (2002). Applied Metacognition. Cambridge University Press. Metacognition and Learning. Springer New York.

- . (1995). : . , 74, 48-56.

- . (2005). -. : .

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (2008). he power of formative assessment. To advance learning Conner. C, (1993). Assessment and testing in the primary school. School Development and the management of change series. The farmer Press.

Obiakor, F. (2000). It even happens in good schools. Corwin Press, U.S.A.http:// www. Sasked.gov.sk.ca/docs/policy/studeval/html

, . (2003). . : .

. (2003). . , , , . : .

, . & , . (2002). . : .

, . (1993). . : . ( ) ( ).

( ). , .