Marketing via Friends: Strategic Diffusion of Information in Social … · 2011. 12. 19. · 2011...

Marketing via Friends: Strategic Diffusion ofInformation in Social Networks with Homophily

Roman Chuhay

Higher School of Economics,ICEF, CAS

Roman Chuhay (ICEF, CAS, HSE) Marketing via Friends 2011 1 / 20

HomophilyHomophily is a tendency of people to interact more with those who aresimilar to them.

I In our context - people with similar preferences tend to interact more.

ρ = 0 ρ = 0.5

ρ = 0.75 ρ = 1.0

ρ = 0 ρ = 0.5

ρ = 0.75 ρ = 1.0

ρ = 0 ρ = 0.5

ρ = 0.75 ρ = 1.0

Literature review

WOM literature:

I Theoretical: Campbell (2010), Goyal and Galeotti (2009), Lopez-Pintado &Watts (2009)

I Empirical: Leskovec et al. (2008), Iribarren and Moro (2007)

Homophily:

I Friendship and segregation: Currarini, Jackson & Pin (2009)

I Learning and diffusion: Jackson & Golub (2010)

I Social norms and preferences: Christakis & Fowler (2007), Fiore and Donath(2005)

Literature review

WOM literature:

I Theoretical: Campbell (2010), Goyal and Galeotti (2009), Lopez-Pintado &Watts (2009)

I Empirical: Leskovec et al. (2008), Iribarren and Moro (2007)

Homophily:

I Friendship and segregation: Currarini, Jackson & Pin (2009)

I Learning and diffusion: Jackson & Golub (2010)

I Social norms and preferences: Christakis & Fowler (2007), Fiore and Donath(2005)

Network structure:

There is measure γ of consumers of type A and 1− γ of type B.

Consumers are embedded into undirected network of social contacts:

I Degree distribution p(k).

I Vector (ρA, ρB) identifies proportion of consumers of the same type in theneighborhood of a randomly chosen consumer of type A and B.

Network structure:

Consumers are embedded into undirected network of social contacts:I Degree distribution p(k).

Network structure:

Consumers are embedded into undirected network of social contacts:I Degree distribution p(k).

Model cont’d

Consumers:

Heterogenous preferences towards the product

I Across types:

F Type A prefers high values of characteristic w

F Type B prefers low values of characteristic w

I Within types:

F Reservation price P̄j

F Threshold level of the product’s characteristic w̄j, s.t. induces a consumer tobuy the product

Consumers can buy the product only if they learn about it from:

I Direct advertisement.

I Observing a neighbor who has already acquired the product.

Model cont’d

Consumers:

Heterogenous preferences towards the product

I Across types:

I Within types:

Model cont’d

Consumers:

Heterogenous preferences towards the productI Across types:

I Within types:

Model cont’d

Consumers:

I Within types:F Reservation price P̄j

Model cont’d

Consumers:

I Within types:F Reservation price P̄j

Model cont’d

Monopolist:

Knows degree distribution p(k) and homophily levels (ρA, ρB).

Maximizes profits by choosing:

I Price P ∈ [0, 1]

I Characteristic of the product w ∈ [0, 1]

Cost of production is 0.

To induce sales the monopolist advertises product to infinitesimal part of thepopulation.

Model cont’d

Monopolist:

I Price P ∈ [0, 1]

Model cont’d

Monopolist:

I Price P ∈ [0, 1]

Model cont’d

Monopolist:

I Price P ∈ [0, 1]

Model cont’d

Monopolist:

I Price P ∈ [0, 1]

Model cont’d

Monopolist:

I Price P ∈ [0, 1]

Model cont’d

Monopolist:

I Price P ∈ [0, 1]

Baseline model assumptions

Population:

Consumers of type A and B constitute half of the population γ = 0.5 andconsequently ρ = ρA = ρB

Preferences:

Reservation price P̄j and threshold value of characteristic w̄j are i.i.d. U[0, 1]

Consumers buy the product with probability:

I Type A: qA = Pr(w ≥ w̄j ∩ P ≤ P̄j) = (1− P)w

I Type B: qB = Pr(w ≤ w̄j ∩ P ≤ P̄j) = (1− P)(1− w)

Population:

Preferences:

Population:

Preferences:

Population:

Preferences:

Population:

Preferences:

Population:

Preferences:

Consumers buy the product with probability:I Type A: qA = Pr(w ≥ w̄j ∩ P ≤ P̄j) = (1− P)w

Population:

Preferences:

Consumers buy the product with probability:I Type A: qA = Pr(w ≥ w̄j ∩ P ≤ P̄j) = (1− P)w

Illustration of the monopolist problem

Monopolist chooses optimally characteristic w and price P to maximizeprofits:

w = 0.

0 1 - PqA

Preferences frontier Induced network of potential buyers

w = 0.25

0 1 - PqA

w = 0.5

0 1 - PqA

w = 0.75

0 1 - PqA

w = 1.

0 1 - PqA

Cascade of sales per advertisement

We modify Newman’s mixing patterns model by incorporating consumersdecision to buy the product (probability that a node is operational).

Expected size of cascade of sales per advertisement:

s(qA, qB , ρ, z1, z2, γ) =

(γ 1− γ)

([I− z2

(qAρ qA(1− ρ)

qB(1− ρ) qBρ

)]−1− I

)where z1 and z2 are expected numbers of first and second neighbors.

Cascade of sales per advertisement

We modify Newman’s mixing patterns model by incorporating consumersdecision to buy the product (probability that a node is operational).

Expected size of cascade of sales per advertisement:

s(qA, qB , ρ, z1, z2, γ) =

(γ 1− γ)

([I− z2

(qAρ qA(1− ρ)

qB(1− ρ) qBρ

)]−1− I

)where z1 and z2 are expected numbers of first and second neighbors.

The global cascade phase

The global cascade: advertisement to infinitesimal part of the populationleads to acquisition of the product by non-zero proportion of the population.

Proposition

If z2z1> min{2, ρ−1} there exist combinations of product characteristic and price

(w ,P) such that global cascade of sales arises.

Necessary condition for existence of the giant component of connectedconsumers, z2

z1> 1.

The existence of the global cascade in the case when z2z1< 2 hinges on the

homophily level.

Proposition

z1> 1.

homophily level.

Proposition

z1> 1.

homophily level.

Proposition

z1> 1.

homophily level.

Optimal design strategy:

Proposition

The optimal characteristic of the product is the following correspondence:

w∗ =

[0, 1], ρ = 1

21/2, ρ < 1

2{0, 1}, ρ > 1

Optimal design strategy: Intuition

ρ = 0 ρ = 1

Case ρ = 0:

I All neighbors are of different type.

I Spreading depends on the attractiveness of the product to both types.

Case ρ = 1:

I Two clusters of consumers of the same type.

I Specialized design is optimal.

ρ = 0 ρ = 1

Case ρ = 0:I All neighbors are of different type.

Case ρ = 1:

I Two clusters of consumers of the same type.

ρ = 0 ρ = 1

Case ρ = 0:I All neighbors are of different type.

Case ρ = 1:I Two clusters of consumers of the same type.

Optimal pricing strategy:

Proposition

The optimal price P∗ is lower than in the case of full information and forρ > 1

2 is strictly decreasing function in the level of homophily.

For two degree distributions p(k) and p’(k) and corresponding optimal pricesP∗ and P ′

∗if p(k) is a mean preserving spread of p’(k) then P∗ < P ′

Demand function

Q(P, ρ, z1, z2) =

1−P2

(1 + z1(1−P)

2−z2/z1(1−P)

), ρ ≤ 1

1−P2

(1 + z1(1−P)

1ρ−z2/z1(1−P)

), ρ > 1

Proposition

The demand function Q(P, ρ, z1, z2) has following properties:

1 Decreasing and convex in price P.

2 Increasing and convex in homophily level ρ, for ρ > 12 .

3 The absolute value of the price elasticity of demand is:

1− P

(1 + z1

z1 − (1− P)z2ρ− 1

z1 + (1− P)(z12 − z2)ρ

which is higher than price elasticity in the case of full information P1−P and is

increasing in homophily level ρ, for ρ > 12 .

Demand function

Q(P, ρ, z1, z2) =

1−P2

(1 + z1(1−P)

2−z2/z1(1−P)

), ρ ≤ 1

1−P2

(1 + z1(1−P)

1ρ−z2/z1(1−P)

), ρ > 1

Proposition

The demand function Q(P, ρ, z1, z2) has following properties:

1 Decreasing and convex in price P.

2 Increasing and convex in homophily level ρ, for ρ > 12 .

3 The absolute value of the price elasticity of demand is:

1− P

(1 + z1

z1 − (1− P)z2ρ− 1

z1 + (1− P)(z12 − z2)ρ

which is higher than price elasticity in the case of full information P1−P and is

increasing in homophily level ρ, for ρ > 12 .

Demand: IntuitionDemand is decreasing and convex in P.

Induced network of buyers.

Welfare

Proposition

Consumers and producers surplus are increasing functions in the homophily levelof the society.

Monopolist surplus is increasing in the level of homophily

I Demand is increasing in the level of homophily.

PS(P∗(ρ), ρ, z1, z2) = P∗(ρ)× Q(P∗(ρ), ρ, z1, z2)

Consumer surplus is increasing in the level of homophily

I Demand is increasing - more consumers buy the product.

I The optimal price is decreasing in the level of homophily.

CS(P∗(ρ), ρ, z1, z2) =

P∗(ρ)Q(P, ρ, z1, z2)dP

Welfare

Proposition

Monopolist surplus is increasing in the level of homophily

I Demand is increasing in the level of homophily.

CS(P∗(ρ), ρ, z1, z2) =

Welfare

Proposition

Monopolist surplus is increasing in the level of homophilyI Demand is increasing in the level of homophily.

CS(P∗(ρ), ρ, z1, z2) =

Welfare

Proposition

CS(P∗(ρ), ρ, z1, z2) =

Welfare

Proposition

Consumer surplus is increasing in the level of homophilyI Demand is increasing - more consumers buy the product.

CS(P∗(ρ), ρ, z1, z2) =

Model Extensions

Targeted advertisement.I Targeting advertisement is always optimal.

I For high enough connectivity the optimal design is the same as withouttargeting.

Non-linear probability frontier.I Bend inward frontier - results are the same.

I Bend outward frontier - similar shape, but design is continuous.

Monopolist benefits from one group.I Low levels of homophily - compromise design is still optimal.

I High levels of homophily - compromise design is optimal when audience issmall.

Model Extensions

Selling to one type.

Price P is fixed and the monopolist maximizes sales to consumers of type B.

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00.0

Proposition

There is threshold value ρ̂1(z1, z2) such that if ρ < ρ̂1(z1, z2) the optimalcharacteristic w∗1 belongs to the interval

(0, 12], while if ρ > ρ̂1(z1, z2) then w∗1 = 0

Price P is fixed and the monopolist maximizes sales to consumers of type B.

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00.0

Proposition

There is threshold value ρ̂1(z1, z2) such that if ρ < ρ̂1(z1, z2) the optimalcharacteristic w∗1 belongs to the interval

(0, 12], while if ρ > ρ̂1(z1, z2) then w∗1 = 0

Consumers of type A constitute 80% of the population (γ = 0.8). Themonopolist maximizes sales to consumers of type B.

The solution:

0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.000.0

Consumers of type A constitute 80% of the population (γ = 0.8). Themonopolist maximizes sales to consumers of type B.

The solution:

0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.000.0

Conclusions

For low levels of homophily the compromise design of product is preferred tospecialized products even if there is no cost of producing more than one typeof product.

Price elasticity of demand is increasing in the homophily level.

Monopolist and consumers benefit from increase in the level of homophily.

A product designed to attract both types of consumers may be optimal evenif a monopolist benefits only from one group of consumers.

Conclusions

Marketing via Friends: Strategic Diffusion of Information in Social … · 2011. 12. 19. · 2011...

Documents

Transcript of Marketing via Friends: Strategic Diffusion of Information in Social … · 2011. 12. 19. · 2011...

Σύμβουλοι Internet Marketing | Esteps.gr

Digital Marketing Υπηρεσίες

Wine Friends - LE MONDE...Ειδική προσφορά • Όσοι επιλέξουν να παρακολουθήσουν το σύνολο του κύκλου Wine Friends για

Greece: Album of family/friends photos. YoUtopia. Overcoming Generation Gap

Digital Marketing - Sephora Case

Digital Marketing (pdf)

Internet marketing

Τότε και τώρα - Friends

International MBA - España · MBA. International. especializado en PROJECT . MANAGEMENT. ... ͳ Street Marketing, Marketing de Guerrilla, Marketing Sensorial... ͳ Big Data aplicado

GREEK EXPORT ALMANAC - MARKETING GUIDES

reverse hotel marketing

Digital Marketing & Μικρομεσαίες Ιστορίες

História do Marketing

Blogs + Social Media Marketing = LOVE

Euxaristo my friends

Social Media Marketing Plan: iNFODATA

QUÉ ES EL MARKETING ORIGEN DEL MARKETING …€¦ · MARKETING POLÍTICO Vs. ... Aplicación profesionalizada y generalizada de las técnicas de marketing en las campañas electorales.

Search & click : Puissance digital Marketing

IAB Interactive Marketing Seminar

Το Marketing και η συμβολή του Στην προώθηση των ...mibes.teilar.gr/esdo_proceedings/proceedings/2011/posters/p5.pdf · παραγωγή και η μεταποίηση