Robust Submodular Maximization: A Non-Uniform Partitioning ...
"The Checklist" - 9c Construction: time series strategies - Expected utility maximization
-
Upload
arpm-advanced-risk-and-portfolio-management -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
15 -
download
0
Transcript of "The Checklist" - 9c Construction: time series strategies - Expected utility maximization
The “Checklist” > 9c. Dynamic allocation: time series strategies > Expected utility maximizationThe objective
The objective
We assume that the utility function satisfies• “rich is better than poor”, i.e.
dutility(y)
dy> 0 (9c.33)
• “richer is better when poor”, i.e.
d2utility(y)
dy< 0 (9c.34)
Exponential utility
utility(y) = −e−λy (9c.35)
Power utility
utility (y) = y1−λ (9c.36)
where 0 < λ < 1.
ARPM - Advanced Risk and Portfolio Management - arpm.co This update: Mar-28-2017 - Last update
The “Checklist” > 9c. Dynamic allocation: time series strategies > Expected utility maximizationOptimization
Optimization
The optimal allocation policy reads
hrisky(·) ≡ argmaxh(·)∈C
(E{utility(V stratthor )}) (9c.37)
constraint
Approaches to solve this problem• dynamic programming• martingale methods
ARPM - Advanced Risk and Portfolio Management - arpm.co This update: Mar-28-2017 - Last update
The “Checklist” > 9c. Dynamic allocation: time series strategies > Expected utility maximizationOptimization
Optimization
The optimal allocation policy reads
hrisky(·) ≡ argmaxh(·)∈C
(E{utility(V stratthor )}) (9c.37)
Arithmetic Brownian motionSuppose that
• V riskyt ← arithmetic Brownian motion (9c.5)
• rrf ≡ 0
• utility(y) = −e−λy
Then the optimal solution is the buy-and-hold policy
hrisky(·) ≡ µ
λσ2(9c.38)
• small λ ⇒ risk-seeking• large λ ⇒ risk-averse
ARPM - Advanced Risk and Portfolio Management - arpm.co This update: Mar-28-2017 - Last update
The “Checklist” > 9c. Dynamic allocation: time series strategies > Expected utility maximizationOptimization
Optimization
The optimal allocation policy reads
hrisky(·) ≡ argmaxh(·)∈C
(E{utility(V stratthor )}) (9c.37)
Geometric Brownian motionSuppose that
• V riskyt ← geometric Brownian motion (9c.8)
• rrf > 0
• utility (y) = y1−λ
Then the optimal solution is the constant weight policy
wrisky ≡ 1
λ
µ− rrf
σ2(9c.39)
• λ ≈ 1 ⇒ risk-seeking• λ� 1 ⇒ risk-averse
ARPM - Advanced Risk and Portfolio Management - arpm.co This update: Mar-28-2017 - Last update
The “Checklist” > 9c. Dynamic allocation: time series strategies > Expected utility maximizationOptimization
Geometric Brownian motion
V stratt ∼ LogN (ln vstrattnow + ( µ
strat − 12(σstrat)2)(t− tnow ), (σstrat)2 (t− tnow )) (9c.40)
≡ rrf + wrisky(µ− rrf ) ≡ wriskyσ
ARPM - Advanced Risk and Portfolio Management - arpm.co This update: Mar-28-2017 - Last update