Linear Response Theory - Physics Courses€¦ · 6 CHAPTER 3. LINEAR RESPONSE THEORY t
SIL verificatie van 3 voorbeelden 3 - · PDF fileSIL verificatie van 3 voorbeelden 3 Herman...
Transcript of SIL verificatie van 3 voorbeelden 3 - · PDF fileSIL verificatie van 3 voorbeelden 3 Herman...
1
SIL verificatie van3 voorbeelden
Herman JansenSafety Solutions Consultants
6 november 2008
Voorbeeld 1 Temp. beveiliging project
Siemens
PCS7-F
SIL 3 certified
Target Integrity SIL 2Proof test interval 1 yearService Sulphuric acid
2
Onderdelen SIF
Sensor: Temperature transmitter ABB type TTH300Sensor: Temperature transmitter ABB, type TTH300
The transmitter is SIL 2 certified by TÜV Nord. Cert. report;Type B instrument, SFF: 91%, Dangerous undetected failure rate: 4,1 ⋅ 10-8 / hour.
SSC uses for the transm. + sensor the following failure rate:λDU 2,4 ⋅ 10-7 / hourSFF >90%Type B
Onderdelen SIF
Logic System
Siemens PCS7-F Safety PLCCertified by TÜV SÜD for application in SIL 3 SIF’s. A PFD is assumed of 1,0 ⋅ 10-4.
3
Onderdelen SIFFinal element Spring to close valve
Solenoid valve 3 way;Solenoid valve, 3-way;Failure rates (Exida):λDU 5,9 ⋅ 10-7 / hour SFF 72%Type A
Globe valveGlobe valveFailure rates (Exida):λDU 1,3 ⋅ 10-6 / hour (appl. ‘severe service, full stroke)SFF 28%Type A
SIL verificatie
Functional requirements:Functional requirements:
The SIF prevents the unwanted high temperature scenario.
4
SIL verificatie
Independency requirements:Independency requirements:
Separately realized from DCS.
SIL verificatie
Probabilistic requirements:
PFDsensor = 2,1 ⋅ 10-3PFDLogic Solver = 1,0 ⋅ 10-4 PFD valve = 1,6 ⋅ 10-2+PFDSIF = 1,8 ⋅ 10-2 : SIL 1
5
SIL verificatie
Architectural requirements:
Temp. Transmitter Type B, HWFT=0 and SFF> 90% : SIL 2Logic Solver TÜV certified : SIL 3Solenoid valve Type A, HWFT=0 and SFF= 60% : SIL 2Gl b l T A HWFT 0 d SFF 60% SIL 1Globe valve Type A, HWFT=0 and SFF< 60% : SIL 1
SIL verificatie
ConclusionThe target SIL is SIL 2. This SIF does not comply to the requirements of SIL 2.
RecommendationClose/stop additionally a second final element.Close/stop additionally a second final element.
6
Voorbeeld 2 Over speed beveiliging project
VSDS motor EM-007
Target Integrity SIL 2Proof test interval 1 year
Onderdelen SIF
Sensor Frequency sensor (inductive proximity sensor)
Failure rates (Exida):λDU 1,0 ⋅ 10-7 / hourSFF 60%Type Ayp
7
Onderdelen SIF
Frequency – current convertor type KFU8-UFC-1.D
Failure rates (Exida):λDU 1,0 ⋅ 10-7 / hourSFF 83%Type Byp
Onderdelen SIF
Fi l l MFinal element Motor
Failure rates (SINTEF):Circuit breaker:λDU 3,0⋅ 10-7 / hourSFF 62%Type AType A
8
SIL verificatie
Functional requirements:
At over speed, the motor will be stopped.
SIL verificatie
Independency requirements:Independency requirements:
Functional & physically separated from control system.
9
SIL verificatie
Probabilistic requirements:
PFDsensor = 8,6 ⋅ 10-4PFDconvertor = 8,6 ⋅ 10-4PFDMCC = 2,6 ⋅ 10-3+PFDSIF 4 3 10 3 SIL 2PFDSIF = 4,3 ⋅ 10-3 : SIL 2
SIL verificatie
Architectural requirements:
Proximity sensor Type A, HWFT=0, SFF= 60% : SIL 2Freq. current convertor Type B, HWFT=0, SFF= 83% : SIL 1Circuit Breaker Type A, HWFT=0, SFF= 62% : SIL 2
10
SIL verificatie
ConclusionThe target SIL is SIL 2. This SIF does not comply with the integrity requirements of SIL 2.
RecommendationInvestigate if there is any redundancy with other sensors which also detect (the consequences of) over speed. If so, these sensors may also be used to meet the SIL 2 requirements.
Voorbeeld 3 Gasdetectie beveiliging project
Kongsberg
F&G systemImtech
UCP-1852Stop ventilation
BI-TorqActuatorSpring to close
RDIO 401S
RAIC 400RedundantRCU500
Bürkert Sol. valve
MidlandShuttle valve
Instrument airreservoir
Target Integrity SIL 1Proof test interval 4 year
Gas detectors Instrument air6-10 barg
11
Sensor Infrared Hydrocarbon Gas Detector AutroPoint HC200 of Autronica. 2oo3.of Autronica. 2oo3.
The sensor is SIL certified by RWTÜV and Exida.λDU 1.23 ⋅ 10-7 / hourSFF 94%Type B
ß 5% (assumed by SSC)
Onderdelen SIF
F&G detection system Kongsberg, type AIM Safe 2000y g g, yp
1oo2 redundant set-up. SIL certified for SIL 2. PFD F&G system, 1 year 6.62 ⋅ 10-4
SSC assumes that the PFDF&G system 4 year is4 ⋅ 6.62 ⋅ 10-4 = 2.6 ⋅ 10-3.
12
Onderdelen SIF
UCP-1852 one relay
Failure rates (SINTEF):λDU 2.0⋅ 10-7 / hourSFF 60%Type A
Onderdelen SIF
Final element3/2 way solenoid valve Bürkert type 6014
j
Final element3/2-way solenoid valve, Bürkert, type 6014
Failure rate (based on Exida failure rate for Generic 3-way solenoid):λDU 5.9 ⋅ 10-7 / hour SFF 72%Type AType A
13
Onderdelen SIF
Final ElementShuttle valve, Midland
SSC assumes the following failure rate λDU 1 ⋅ 10-7 / hour SFF 60%Type A
Fire Damper type MFD of Wozair and Ltd BI-TORQ actuator type stainless steel, B5-SS-SR
h h ff h d b ll f d l l dTight air shut off is achieved by precision roll formed sprung stainless steel grade 316L (1.4404) side seals and welded top and bottom angle blade stops.The damper has been fully tested to the Solas Rules/FTP Code Resolution A754(18) together with its relevant means operation and also BS476 Pt20 for 4 hours. The damper is certified by Lloyds Register of Shipping and carries the MED/MRA mark of conformity. For smoke clearance the damper is certified at 300°C for 1 hour for high temperature operation. The damper is also type approved by DNV, BV, ABS, RINA, GL and USCG under the Marine. Equipment Directive/Mutual Recognition Agreement.
SSC assumes the following failure rate;λDU 3.0 ⋅ 10-6 / hour SFF > 60% Type A
14
SIL verificatie
Functional requirements:
An explosion within the HVAC accommodation will be prevented by shutting down the air inlet at measured HC concentration.
SIL verificatie
Independency requirements:Independency requirements:
Functional & physically separated from other layers of protection.
15
SIL verificatieProbabilistic requirements:PFD2oo3 IR detectors = 1.5 ⋅ 10-4PFDLogic Solver = 2.6 ⋅ 10-3PFDrelay = 4.1 ⋅ 10-3PFDsol. valve = 1.2 ⋅ 10-2PFDshuttle valve = 2.1 ⋅ 10-3PFDFire damper = 5.9 ⋅ 10-2+PFDInstrumentation = 8.0 ⋅ 10-2PFDl ti f 5 0 10 3PFDlocation of sensors = 5.0 ⋅ 10-3+PFDSIF = 8.5 ⋅ 10-2 : SIL 1
It is assumed by SSC that the detectors will not sense gas (in time) once per 200 gas releases due to unusual gas flow pattern in the ventilation duct.
SIL verificatie
Architectural requirements:q
IR detector Type B, HWFT=1 and SFF= 94% : SIL 3F&G system Certified by TÜV : SIL 2Relay Type A, HWFT=0 and SFF= 60% : SIL 2Solenoid valve Type A, HWFT=0 and SFF= 72% : SIL 2Shuttle valve Type A, HWFT=0 and SFF= 60% : SIL 2Fire Damper & act. Type A, HWFT=0 and SFF= 60% : SIL 2
16
SIL verificatie
ConclusionTh t t SIL 1 i t b d f t t i t l f 4The target SIL 1 is met based on a proof test interval of 4 years.
RecommendationThe closing function can overruled by switching a hand operated push/pull valve between air reservoir and damper is in ‘override’ position (air reservoir air flows to the damper actuator). Measures shall be taken to prevent that the hand valve is in overrideshall be taken to prevent that the hand valve is in override position during normal operation.
Safety Solutions Consultants BV
Laan van Westenenk 5017334 DT ApeldoornThe NetherlandsTel +31 55 549 3362E il j @ f tE-mail [email protected] www.safety-sc.com