PIP-II 650 MHz β=0.90 & 0.92 Jacketed Cavity Prototype Final …€¦ · Saravan K. Chandrasekaran...

In partnership with:

India/DAE

Italy/INFN

UK/STFC

France/CEA/Irfu, CNRS/IN2P3

PIP-II 650 MHz β=0.90 & 0.92 Jacketed Cavity Prototype Final Design Review

Saravan K. Chandrasekaran

PIP-II β=0.90 & 0.92 Jacketed Cavity FDR

1 February 2019

Outline

• Scope/Deliverables

– (Including In-Kind Contributions)

• Requirements

• Interfaces

• Preliminary Design, Maturity

• Technical Progress to Date

• ESH&Q

• Risks and Mitigations

• Summary

2/1/2019S. Chandrasekaran | B90 & B92 JCAV Proto FDR Introduction2

PIP-II Project


Goals

▪ Deliver 1.2 MW of proton beam power from the Main Injector over

the energy range 60 – 120 GeV, at the start of LBNF ops─ Establish a platform for future upgrades to multi-MW capability

▪ Provide a platform for extension of capability to high duty

factor/higher beam power, multiple users and reliable operations─ Support the ongoing 8 GeV program, including an upgrade path for Mu2e

MissionPIP-II will deliver the world’s most intense beam of neutrinos to the international LBNF/DUNE project, and enable a broad physics research program, powering new discoveries for decades to come.

Building the world’s most powerful neutrino beam

PIP-II SRF & CRYO International Collaborations


Compressor System

He Gas Tanks

LHeDewar

Cold Box

Distribution Box

Cryogenic Transfer Lines

Gas HeaderHB650HWR SSR1 SSR2 LB650

·

Tex

tCryomodules

HWR X 1 SSR1 X 2

SSR2 X 7

LB650 X 11

HB650 X 4

PIP-II is the first accelerator project in the U.S. with substantial

international participation

PIP-II HB650


• CW operation & 2 mA beam current

Cryomodule Number (Prototype

+ installed)

Cavity Number

Magnet Number

Testing Note

LB650 1+11 3 0 Partial Test at Partner lab, Full Test at FNAL

Integrated Design

HB650 1+4 6 0 Test at FNAL Integrated Design

PIP-II Project Organization


650 MHz Technical Team

• 650 MHz Lead: S. Chandrasekaran

• Cavity Q & testing: M. Martinello

• Cavity jacketing & fabrication: C. Grimm

• Cavity design:– RF: I. Gonin, T. Khabiboulline, G. Romanov– Mechanical: I. Gonin, N. Sharma*, V. Jain*, N. Nigam*– Drawings: C. Grimm, V. Jain*

• RF tuning: T. Khabiboulline

• Tuner: Y. Pischalnikov, S. Cheban

• Coupler: N. Solyak, S. Kazakov, O. Pronitchev

• CM design: V. Roger

*Indian Institutions Fermilab Collaboration Guest Engineers


Review Charge (1)

• Technical Scope– Are the designs mature and technically sound to satisfy design

specifications?– Is the design likely to meet performance expectations?– Have installation issues been adequately addressed?– Have all the major interfaces been identified and incorporated

into the design? – Are all design specifications, requirements, performance, and

interface documents reviewed, approved and released?

• Design Management– Is the design team organized and staffed to successfully

complete the project?– Have all the major risks been identified and managed?– Are procurements appropriately planned?– Is the development of associated drawing packages sufficiently

mature?


Review Charge (2)

• Cost and Schedule– Is the cost and schedule reasonable to achieve the planned scope?

This is a reasonableness assessment by technical experts, not a detailed cost/schedule review.

• ES&H and QA/QC– Are all related ES&H aspects being properly addressed?– Are appropriate QA and QC steps being implemented?

• Miscellaneous– Have all the previous design review action items/comments been

addressed?– Have lessons learned been addressed?– Are there any other issues that have been identified that need to be

addressed?

• Overall Readiness– Is the design sufficiently mature to allow Final Design Review

approval?


2/1/201910

END

S. Chandrasekaran | B90 & B92 JCAV Proto FDR Introduction

PIP-II 650 MHz β=0.90 & 0.92 Jacketed Cavity Prototype Final …€¦ · Saravan K. Chandrasekaran...

Documents

Transcript of PIP-II 650 MHz β=0.90 & 0.92 Jacketed Cavity Prototype Final …€¦ · Saravan K. Chandrasekaran...