Oxidation of Steroidal 5-En-3β-ol with Pyridinium Chlorochromate: Isolation of Key Intermediate,...
Transcript of Oxidation of Steroidal 5-En-3β-ol with Pyridinium Chlorochromate: Isolation of Key Intermediate,...
This article was downloaded by: [Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona]On: 16 October 2014, At: 02:12Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH,UK
Synthetic Communications: AnInternational Journal for RapidCommunication of SyntheticOrganic ChemistryPublication details, including instructions forauthors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lsyc20
Oxidation of Steroidal 5-En-3β-ol with PyridiniumChlorochromate: Isolation ofKey Intermediate, Steroidal 6β-Hydroxy-4-en-3-oneS. S. Korde a , R. A. Udasi a & G. K. Trivedi aa Department of Chemistry , Indian Institute ofTechnology , Mumbai, 400076, IndiaPublished online: 22 Aug 2006.
To cite this article: S. S. Korde , R. A. Udasi & G. K. Trivedi (1997) Oxidation ofSteroidal 5-En-3β-ol with Pyridinium Chlorochromate: Isolation of Key Intermediate,Steroidal 6β-Hydroxy-4-en-3-one, Synthetic Communications: An International Journalfor Rapid Communication of Synthetic Organic Chemistry, 27:19, 3419-3430, DOI:10.1080/00397919708005643
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00397919708005643
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all theinformation (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and viewsexpressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of theContent should not be relied upon and should be independently verified withprimary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for anylosses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly orindirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of theContent.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone isexpressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found athttp://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
idad
Aut
onom
a de
Bar
celo
na]
at 0
2:12
16
Oct
ober
201
4
SYNTHETIC COMMUNICATIONS, 27( 19), 3419-3430 (1997)
OXIDATION OF STEROIDAL 5-EN-3p-OL WITH PYRIDINIUM CHLOROCHROMATE : ISOLATION OF KEY INTERMEDIATE, STEROIDAL 6P-HYDROXY-4-EN-3-ONE
S. S. Korde. R. A. Udasi and G. K. Trivedi'
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai-400076. India
Abstract : The PCC oxidation of 5-en-30-01 steroids proceeds to 4-en-3,6-dione through the intermediate 5-en-3-one. The isolation of another key intermediate, steroidal 6P-hydroxy-4-en-3-0ne guides an understanding of the mechanism involved.
Steroidal 5-en-3P-01 compounds commonly occur in nature. Pregnenolone,
cholesterol and diosgenin are some examples of compounds belonging to this
class. Pregnenolone is a precursor to a number of adrenocortico and gonadal
hormones in our body' while cholesterol is an architectural component of the
biological membranes.2 Of the steroid drug precursors, diosgenin is most
important and versatile, and is used for the synthesis of nearly 50% of the total
steroid drugs in the world.3 Conversion of these homoallylic alcohols to steroidal
4-en-3-one compounds is a crucial step in the synthesis of most steroid hormones.
Oppenauer oxidation was a traditional method used during the early years of
synthesis: but reaction setups were tedious and workups were laborious. Hence
To whom correspondence should be addressed.
3419
Copyright 0 1997 by Marcel Dekker. Inc.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
idad
Aut
onom
a de
Bar
celo
na]
at 0
2:12
16
Oct
ober
201
4
3420 KORDE, UDASI, AND TRIVEDI
simple alternatives to Oppenauer oxidations were sought and found in chromium
oxidizing reagents due to facile reaction conditions and elementary procedures.5
Homoallylic steroidal alcohols have been oxidized by several chromium
reagents like Na2Cr207 in AcOH,6 pyridinium dichromate,’ CrO3 in pyridines
and Jones reagenL9 Pyridinium chlorochromate (PCC) has also proved to be a
good oxidizing agent for this purpose.10-11 Recently prolonged oxidations of
steroidal 4-ene-3p-01 compounds with PCC in dichloromethane to steroidal 4-en-
3,6-diones via the intermediate 5-en-3-one have been reported.’*
I n this paper, we wish to report short time reaction of PCC on steroidal 5-
en-3fl-01 in dichloromethane and isolation of the speculated intermediate 6p-
hydroxy-5-en-3-one during the formation of steroidal 4-ene-3,6-dione. The
stereochemical and mechanistic possibilities leading to the intermediates and
products formed are also discussed herein.
16a-Methylpregnenolone (1A) was subjected to excess of PCC in dry
dichloromethane at room temperature and the reaction was monitored by thin
layer chromatography (TLC). After half an hour, TLC of the reaction mixture,
carried out in 20% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether as the solvent, showed three
spots, among which one with rf 0.4 belonged to the starting material. A dominant
spot was seen at rf 0.8 and a faint one at rf 0.5. TLC was again recorded after an
hour. Two additional spots appeared, one being close to that of the starting
material with rf 0.3 and the other just below it with rf 0.25. The reaction was
stopped and the usual workup was followed by separation of the obtained mixture
of compounds by careful column chromatography using silica gel and ethyl
acetate-petroleum ether as eluant. This resulted in the purification of the two
compounds that were less polar, but the more polar compounds were obtained as a
mixture. These were finally separated by changing the eluant to dichloromethane.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
idad
Aut
onom
a de
Bar
celo
na]
at 0
2:12
16
Oct
ober
201
4
STEROIDAL 6P-HYDROXY-4-EN-3-ONE 342 1
The mass, IR, and IH NMR spectra of the compounds were recorded. The
least polar compound was identified as 16a-methylpregn-5-en-3,20-dione (1 B),
compound with rf 0.5 as 16a-methylpregn-4-en-3,20-dione (IC), compound with
rf 0.3 as 16a-methylpregn-4-en-3,6,20-trione (ID) and the most polar compound
as 6P-hydroxy- 16a-methyIpregn-4-en-3,2O-dione (I E). The spectral data of these
compounds corroborated well with the literature reports.I3
The ‘€1 NMR spectrum of the mixture as such revealed that the ratio of
products B. C, D and E was 2 : 0.6 : I : I . 16a-Ethylpregnenolone (ZA), 16a-
prop-2’-enylpregnenolone (3A) , cholesterol (4A) and diosgenin (SA) were also
subjected to PCC reaction under identical conditions (Fig.1 ). The results were
similar to that obtained for the reaction with 16a-methylpregnenolone.
The oxidation of homoallylic steroidal alcohols with PCC led to four
products viz. B, C, D and E. Thus, it can be established that, in agreement with
the earlier report, the reaction follows a path where pyridinium chlorochromate
first oxidizes the homoallylic alcohol to a homoallylic ketone B. Due to a mild
acidic nature of PCC, some of the compound B is isomerised to the conjugated
ketone C. Excess of PCC then oxidizes the 5-en-3-one B to 6P-hydroxy 4-en-3-
one E and finally to 4-en-3,6-dione D.
Blaszezyk and Paryzek have suggested an ionic mechanism for PCC
oxidation’* while Solaja et a1 contemplate a free radical mechanism for Jones’
oxidation in ether.9 Although there is no evidence whether Cr(V1) reagents operate
through the ionic or free radical mode, a comparison of the two mechanisms can
be made i n light of the stereochemistry of isolated intermediate E.
Both the mechanisms for the formation of compound D suggest the
abstraction of the 4-H from compound B. The radical mechanism is assumed to
proceed with a conformational flip prior to the 4-H abstraction which facilitates
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
idad
Aut
onom
a de
Bar
celo
na]
at 0
2:12
16
Oct
ober
201
4
3422 KORDE, UDASI, AND TRIVEDI
A
&;@ t o@R
0
0 OH
C D E
1 2 3 4 5
e \.oo R Me Et M H
+ R' COCH3 COCHj COCH3
Figure 1 : PCC oxidation of homoallylic steroidal alcohols
the removal of 4a-H. Resonance stabilised C-6 radical 6 subsequently undergoes
hydroxylation of the C-6 radical to give 6P-hydroxy-4-en-3-one E. It should be
noted that the 6P-hydroxy compound E was formed exclusively. Alternatively, the
ionic abstraction of the 4-H proton leads to an enolate 7. The attack of chromate
ion at C-6 of the enolate 7 gives 6P-hydroxy-4-en-3-one.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
idad
Aut
onom
a de
Bar
celo
na]
at 0
2:12
16
Oct
ober
201
4
STEROIDAL 6P-HYDROXY-4-EN-3-ONE 3423
H r *°Cr02CI
6
7
Figure 2 : Conformations of radical 6 and enolate 7 as seen in the model
Comparing the models of radical 6 and enolate 7 (Fig.2) clearly shows that
an exclusive P attack is more feasible on the enolate rather than on the radical.
The three axial protons viz. la-H, 7a-H and 9a-H completely hinder an a attack
on the enolate. On the P side, the 19-methyl is directed away from C-6 and only
one axial proton viz. 8P-H causes some hindrance. In contrast, due to the quasi
axial disposition of the 7a-H, the a face of the radical 6 is comparatively less
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
idad
Aut
onom
a de
Bar
celo
na]
at 0
2:12
16
Oct
ober
201
4
3424 KORDE, UDASI, AND TRlVF rrl
hindered. The 0 side of the radical is more hindered as compared to that of the
enolate since the 19-methyl is directed more towards C-6. Some hindrance is
caused by 8p-14 as well. Another elusion to an exclusive p attack on the radical 6
is the radical inversion process. Thus, if a radical mechanism is assumed, a
question strongly arises as to why is the 6a-hydroxy-4-en-3-one not formed.
Solaja et a19 claim that there is no enolisatioii prior to reaction and that the
proton abstracted is exclusively 4a. They obtained 4-deuterio-cholest-4-en-3,6-
dione on oxidation of 4P-deuterio cholesterol. But this circumstance may well be
conceived in an ionic process, wherein, the 4a-H is abstracted by the chromate
species via a cyclic mechanism as suggested by Blaszezyk and Paryzek,I2
followed by a rapid attack of the chromate ion at C-6.
In conclusion, although the radical mechanism cannot be ruled out, the
exclusive formation of steroidal 6P-hydroxy-5-en-3-one leads us to the belief that
an ionic mechanism is operational during PCC oxidation of the steroidal
homoallylic alcohols to the 4-en-3,6-diones.
Experimental
16a-Methyl-, 16a-ethyl- and 16a-prop-2'-enylpegn-S-en-3P-o1 were
synthesized from 3 0-hydroxypregn-5, I6-dien-20-one according to the available
procedures in the literature. I4 Diosgenin and cholesterol were obtained from
Glaxo Laboratories, India and recrystallised before use.
IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer 681 spectrophotometer in
CHCI,. A Hewlett Packard MS Engine 5989-A spectrometer was used to record
the mass spectra. IH NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian VXR 300s. About 5
mg of the sample was dissolved in 0.6 mL of the solvent.
Oxidation of 3P-hydroxy-16a-methylpregn-5-en-20-0ne (1A)
3P-hydroxy-l6a-methylpregn-5-en-20-one (1A) (4 g, 12.12 mmol) was
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
idad
Aut
onom
a de
Bar
celo
na]
at 0
2:12
16
Oct
ober
201
4
STEROIDAL 6P-HYDROXY-4-EN-3-ONE 3425
dissolved in dry dichloromethane (100 mL). Pyridinium chlorochromate (7.78 g,
36.36 mmol) was added and the solution stirred for one hour. The solvent was
then evaporated to half and the slurry was poured over a silica gel column and
eluted with 50 % ethyl acetate in petroleum ether. Evaporation of the solvent gave
a mixture of compounds B, C, D and E, free of the chromium reagent, which was
then subjected to silica gel column chromatography with the eluant as 20 % ethyl
acetate-petroleum ether to obtain pure compounds B and C . To obpin pure
compounds D and E, the mixture of D and E was loaded on a fresh silica gel
column and eluted with dichloromethane. The compounds lB, lC, ID and 1E
were obtaind in yields of 1.43 g, 0.40 g, 0.79 g and 0.63 g respectively.
16a-methylpregn-!%en-3,20-dione (1B)
MS: m/z = 328 (M+, 4%).
IR(CHCI3): t 3030 (OH), 2924,2875, 1712, 1464 cm-1.
'H NMR (CDCI,): 6 5.34(bs, IH, 6-H), 3.29(m, IH, 4P-H), 2.83(dd, J=16.4,2.4
Hz, IH, 4a-H), 2.69(m, I H , 16P-H), 2.49(ddd, J=15.0, 13.8, 5.7 Hz, IH, 2P-H),
2.3l(m, IH, 2a-H), 2.13(s, 3H, 21-H3), 1.19(s, 3H, 19-H3), 0.95(d, J=6.9Hz, 3H,
1 '-H3), 0.69(~, 3H, 18-HJ).
16a-methylpregn-4-en-3,20-dione (1 C)
MS: m/z = 328 (M+, lo%), 313, 124,79.
IR(CHC13):T 3036,2930,2868, 1712,1681,1464.1389 cm-1.
'H NMR (CDCI,): 6 5.74(bs, lH, 4-H), 2.69(m, IH, 16P-H), 2.44(ddd, J=15.0,
13.8, 5.7 Hz, IH, 2P-H), 2.28(ddd, J=14.7, 4.5, 2.4 Hz, lH, 6a-H), 2.15(d, J=9
Hz, IH, 17a-H), 2.13(s, 3H, 21-H3), 1.18(s, 3H, 19-H3), 0.95(d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H, 1'-
HJ), 0.69(~, 3H, 18-H3).
16a-methylpregn-4-en-3,6,20-trione (1 D)
MS: m/z = 342 (M+, 24%). 327,299,284.
IR(CHCl3): 7 3032,2920,2875, 1736, 1700, 1464, 1380 em-1.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
idad
Aut
onom
a de
Bar
celo
na]
at 0
2:12
16
Oct
ober
201
4
3426 KORDE, UDASI, AND TFUVEDI
*H NMR (CDC13): 6 6.20(s, IH, 6-H), 2.70(m, IH, 16P-H), 2.67(dd, J=15.9, 3.9
Hz, IH, 7P-H), 2.56(ddd, J=15.0, 13.8, 5.7 Hz, IH, 2P-H), 2.19(d, J=9 Hz, IH, 17
a-H), 2.15(s, 3H, 21-H3), 1.17(s, 3H, 19-H3), 0.97(d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H, I'-H3),
0.71(~, 3H, 18-H3).
6P-hydroxy-16a-methyIpregn-4-en-3,20-dione (1E)
MS: m/z = 344 (M', 25%), 329,326,283.
IR(CHCI3):T 3400,3032,2920,2875, 1736,1700,1470,1380 cm-l.
'H NMR (CDCI,): 6 5.86(s, IH, 6-H), 4.4(t, J= 2.4 Hz, lH, 6a-H), 2.69(m, IH,
16P-H), 2.54(ddd, J=16.8, 14.7, 5.1 Hz, IH, 2P-H), 2.40(m, IH, 2a-H), 2.16(d,
J=9 Hz, IH, 17a-H), 2.14(~, 3H, 2I-H3), 1.38(~, 3H, 19-H3), 0.96(d, 5 ~ 6 . 9 Hz,
3H, l'-H3), 0.72(s, 3H, 18-H3).
Oxidation of 3P-hydroxy-16a-ethylpregn-5-en-20-one (2A)
3P-hydroxy-16a-ethyIpregn-5-en-2O-one (0.5 g, I .46 mmol) was reacted
with PCC (1.94 g, 4.39 mmol) in a similar manner as that of compound 1A. The
crude was subjected to silica gel column chromatography and the steroidal
mixture sans chromium impurities was dissolved in methanol (20 mL) to which
oxalic acid (2 g) was added. The mixture was warmed for 30 minutes and
evaporated to dryness. The organic residue was redissolved in ether, washed with
2 % NaOH solution. water and brine and dried over anhydrous NaZS04. The
compounds C, D and E were obtaind in 50 %, 15 % and 18 % yields respectively.
16a-ethylpregn-4-en-3,20-dione (2C)
MS: mlz=.342 (M', loo%), 327,313, 124.
IR(CHC13):O 3036,2926,2875, 1712,1688, 1464 cm-1.
IH NMR (CDCI,): 6 5.74(bs, IH, 4-H), 2.51(m, lH, 16P-H), 2.44(ddd, J=17.3.
14.1, 5.1 Hz, IH, 2P-II), 2.28(ddd, J=14.7, 4.5, 2.4 Hz, IH, 6a-H), 2.22(d, J=9
Hz, Ill, 17a41), 2.14(s, 3€1, 21-H3), 1.18(s, 3€1, l9-113), 0.81(t, J=7.2 Hz, 3H, 2'-
H3), 0.69(~, 3H, 18-H3).
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
idad
Aut
onom
a de
Bar
celo
na]
at 0
2:12
16
Oct
ober
201
4
STEROIDAL 6P-HYDROXY-4-EN-3-ONE 3427
16a-ethylpregn-4-en-3,6,20-trione (2D)
MS: m/z= 356 (M+, loo%), 327,313.
IR(CHCI3): 7 3026,2960,2875, 1720,1696,1466,1387 cm-l.
IH NMR (CDC13): 6 6.19(~, IH, 6-H), 2.69(dd, Jc15.9, 3.9 Hz, IH, 7P-H).
2.26(d, J=9Hz, IH, 17a-H), 2.16(~, 3H, 21-H3), 1.17(~, 3H, 19-H3), 0.82(t, J=7.2
Hz, 3H, 2'-H3), 0.71(s, 3H, l8-H3).
6P-hydroxy-l6a-ethylpregn-4-en-3,20-dione (2E)
MS: m/z = 358 (M', SO%), 343,329,315.
IR(CHCI3): 3 3400,2924,2870, 1730,1694,1470 cm-1.
IH NMR (CDC13): 6 5.91(~, IH, 6-H), 4.45(t, J= 2.4 Hz, IH, 6a-H), 2.21(d, J=9
Hz, IH, 17a-H), 2.14(s, 3H, 21-H3), 1.38(s, 3H, 19-H3), 1.33(t, J=7.2 Hz, 3H, 2'-
H3), 0.69(~, 3H, 18-H3).
Oxidation of 3P-hydroxy-l6a-prop-2'-enylpregn-5-en-20-one (3A)
3P-hydroxy- 16a-prop-2'-enyl pregn-5-en-20-one (2 g, 5.26 mmol) was
reacted with PCC (3.61 g, 16.86 mmol) in the same manner as that of compound
1A. The compounds B, C, D and E were obtaind in yields of 0.60 g, 0.40 g, 0.4 1 g
and 0.37 g respectively.
16a-prop-2'-enylpregn-S-en-3,20-dione (3B)
MS: m/z = 354 (M+, 8%).
IR(CtlC13): 7 3500,3030,2927,1725,1709,1660,1459,1387 cm-1.
IH NMR (CDCI,): 6 5.66(m, lH, 2'-€I), 5.62(bs, IH, 6-H), 4.91-5.01(m, 211, 3'-
Hz), 3.29(m7 IH, 4a-H), 2.84(dd, J=15.5, 2.1. 1H. 4PH) 2.73(m, IH, 16a-H),
2.49(ddd, J=15.0, 13.8, 5.7 tlz, I H , 2P-H), 2.25(d, J=9 Hz, I€{, 17a-H), 2.11(~,
3t1, 2 1-1 13), 1.18(~, 311, 19-€l3), 0.69(~, 3H, 18-H3).
16a-prop-2'-enylpregn-4-en-3,20-dione (3C)
MS: m/z = 354 (Mt, 4%), 3 13 (80%).
IR(CHC13): T 3032,2940, 1709, I68 I , 1660, 1459, 1387 cm-1.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
idad
Aut
onom
a de
Bar
celo
na]
at 0
2:12
16
Oct
ober
201
4
3428 KORDE, UDASI, AND TRIVEDI
IH NMR (CDCI3): 6 5.74(s, I H , 4-H), 5.65(m, IH, 2'-H), 4.91-5.02(m, 2H, 3'-
M2), 2.73(m, IH, I6P-€I), 2.44(ddd, J=17.4, 13.8, 4.8 Hz, IH, 2P-H). 2.47(d, J=9
€ 1 ~ 111, 17a-H), 2.10(s, 3H, 21-113), 1.18(s, 3H, 19-I13),0.69(s, 3H, 18-H3).
16a-prop-2'-enylpregn-4-en-3,6,2O-trione (3D)
MS: mlz = 368 (M+, 15%), 353,327, 124.
IR(CHCI3): 'v 3026,2920,2874, 1720, 1690, 1460 cm-1.
'H NMR (CDC13): 6 6.20(s. I H , 4-H), 2.77(m, IH, 16P-H), 2.68(dd. J=15.9, 3.9
Hz, 111, 7P-H), 2.55(ddd, 3~17 .4 , 14.1, 5.1 Hz, lH, 2P-H), 2.29(d, J=9 Hz, IH, 17
a-H),2.12(s, 3H, 21-H3), 1.17(s, 3H, 19-H3), 0.70(s, 3H, 18-H3).
6P-hydroxy-l6a-prop-2'-enyl pregn-4-en-3,20-dione (3E)
MS: m/z = 371 (M+I), 355,352, 124.
IR(CHCl3): 3 3500,3030,2927, 1725,1709,1660,1459,1387 cm-I.
IH NMR (CDC13): 6 5.90(s, IH, 4-H), 5.65(m, IH, 2'-H), 4.96-5.01(m, 2H, 3'-
Hz), 4.44(dd, 3=3.3, 2.4 Hz, I H , 6a-H), 2.73(m, lH, 16a-H), 2.55(ddd, J=17.4,
14.7, 5.1 Hz, IH, 2P-H), 2.24(d, J=9 Hz, IH, I~cx-H), 2.10(~, 3H, 21-H3), 1.31(~,
3H, 19-H3), 0.65(s, 3H, 18-H3).
Oxidation of iholesterol(4A)
Cholesterol (0.5 g, 1.29 mmol) was reacted with PCC (0.83 g, 3.87 mmol)
in rhe same manner as that of compound 1A. The reaction mixture was passed
through silica gel column and eluted with 50 % ethyl acetate in petroleum ether.
The mixture was concentrated and repurified to isolate the hydroxy derivative 4E
in a yield of 20 % (0.1 g).
6P-Hydroxyehoiest-4-en-3-one (4E)
MS: m/z = 401 (M+I), 341,327,313.
IH NMR (CDCI,): 6 5.89(~, lH, 4-H), 4.44(dd, J=3.9, 2.4 Hz, IH, 6a-H),
2.55(ddd, J=16.8, 14.7, 5.1 Hz, IH, 2P-H), 0.91(d, J=6.3, 3H, 21-H3), 1.33(s, 3H,
19-113). 0.87(d, J=6.6, 3H, 26-€13), 0.82(d, J=6.6, 3H, 27-H3), 0.71(~, 3H, 18-H3).
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
idad
Aut
onom
a de
Bar
celo
na]
at 0
2:12
16
Oct
ober
201
4
STEROIDAL 6P-HYDROXY-4-EN-3-ONE 3429
Oxidation of diosgenin (5A)
Diosgenin (0.5, 1.21 mmol) was reacted with PCC (0.78 g, 3.62 mmol) in
the same manner as that of compound 4A. Compound 5E was obtained in a yield
of 16 Yo (0.08g).
6P-Hydroxyspirostan-22a0-4-en-3-one (5E)
MS: m/z =428 ( M', lo%), 139 ([CgH50]+, 100%)
IH NMR (CDCl,): 6 5.82(bs, lH, 4-H), 4.41(m, lH, 16a-H), 4.36(t, J=3 Hz, lH,
6a-H), 3.43- 3.52(m, lH, 26a-H), 3.36(t, J=10.8 Hz, lH, 26P-H), .1.40(s, 3H, 19-
H3). 0.98(d, 5 ~ 7 . 2 Hz, 3H, 21-H3), 0.85(~ , 3H, 18-H3), 0.79(d, J=6.3 Hz, 3H, 27-
H3),
Acknowledgements
One of us (SSK) thanks C.S.I.R. for the financial assistance. The spectral facilities
provided by R.S.I.C., Mumbai are gratefully acknowledged.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6 .
7.
8.
Murray, R.K., Gaanner, D.K., Mayers, P.A. and Rodwell, V.W. "Harper's
Biochemistry", ed. 23, Appleton & Lange, 1993.
Nes, W.R. and McKean, M.L., "Biochemistry of Steroids and other
Isoprenoids", University Park Press, Baltimore, 1977.
Asolkar, L.V. and Chada Y.R., "Diosgenin and other Drug Precursors",
Publication and Infromation Directorate, C.S.I.R., New Delhi, 1979, pp 93.
Fried, J. and Edwards, J.A., "Organic Reactions in Steroid Chemistry", Vol.
I, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 1972.
Cainelli, G. and Cardillo, G., "Chromium Oxidations in Organic Chemistry".
Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1984.
Fieser, L.F., .J.Arn.Chern.Soc. 1953, 75,4377
DAuria, M., De Mico, A,, D'Onofrio, F. and Scettri, A., Synfhesis 1985,988.
Brown, H.C., Garg, C.P..and Liu, K.T. JUrg.Chern. 1971, 36, 387.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
idad
Aut
onom
a de
Bar
celo
na]
at 0
2:12
16
Oct
ober
201
4
3430 KORDE, UDASI, AND TRIVEDI
9. Solaja, B.A., Milic, D.R. and Dosen-Micovic, L.J. Steroids, 1994,59,330.
10. Cheng, Y.S., Liu, W.L., Chen, S., Synlhesis, 1980,223.
1 1 . Parish, E.J., Kizito, S.A. and Heidepreim, W. Synth.Commun. 1993,23,223.
12. Blaszezyk, K. and Paryzek, Z. Synth.Commun. 1994,24,3255.
13. Kirk, D.N.,Toms, H.C., Douglas, C., White, K.A., Smith, K.A., Latif, S. and
Hubbard, W.P. J. ChemSoc. Perkin Trans. JI 1990, 1567.
14. Majetich, G., Caseras, A., Chapman, D. and Behnke, M. J.Org.Chem. 1986,
51, 1745.
(Received in the U K 4th March 1997)
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
idad
Aut
onom
a de
Bar
celo
na]
at 0
2:12
16
Oct
ober
201
4