1. ;9 10 2013 : ..., ...,

2. ;2 3. ;3 4. ;4 ; ... ISBN 978-960-243-689-9 : , , & , ., , ., , . & , . (2013). - ;, . .sapth2013.web.auth.gr, //. 5. ;5 , . . , . . , , , , . .... , .... , , (PhD), .... , . .... , , . .... , .. , .. ..., , Physics Partizani (PhD), (PhD), (PhD), (PhD), . 04 , ..... , , .... (PhD), . (PhD) (PhD), , (PhD), 04 , , .... (PhD), 04 6. ;6 (PhD), 04 , ... , (PhD), , , .... , , .... , . , . , , .... (PhD), , , , , .... 7. ;7 ;................................... 11 ....................................................................................................... 13 . ......................................... 15H (;) ...................................................................................... 27 : ....................................................................... 35 ....................................................................... 47 1........................................................................................................................ 57 : -- -;....................................................................... 59 ;.................................................................... 69 : .................................................................................................................................................. 77 ................................. 85 ............................................... 89 ( ) .......................................................................................................... 95 1 ....................................................................................................................... 99 .............................................................................................................................. 101 8. ;8 - ..................................................... 109 : ........................................................................................................................ 117 ............. 129 : "" .......................................................... 141 2...................................................................................................................... 151 , .......................................................................................................................... 153 3...................................................................................................................... 157 ............................ 159 .......................................................................... 163 ................................................................................................................. 167 2 ..................................................................................................................... 175 . ....................................................................................................................... 177 ...................... 189 ..................... 199 . ................................................................................................................................................... 209 9. ;9 .................................................. 221 4...................................................................................................................... 231 . ....................................................................................... 233 5...................................................................................................................... 243 ........................................ 245 - ......................................... 253 PROJECT .......................................... 263: ........................................................................... 275 " - " : (PROJECT)......................................... 287 3 ..................................................................................................................... 299 : ....................... 301 : ....................................................................................................................... 311 ....................................................................................................... 321 ............................... 329 6...................................................................................................................... 339 10. ;10 .: PLANCK (LED) ............................................................................................... 341 PROJECT ; 19 ................................................ 349 ............................................................................................ 355 - ............................................................................................. 365 4 ..................................................................................................................... 373 -: ..... 375 : ..................................... 383 ( -) .................................................................................................................... 389 : ....................................................................... 395 ........................................................................................... 407 11. ;11 ; , , ; 9 10 2013 . 26 2011 : . , . . , , .. ; , ; , ; , , ; , ; , , ; , ; ; ;. ; ; , ; ; 12. ;12 ; , , ; , ; , ; ; , ; ; , , ; ; , ; ; ; , , ; , ; (project); , ; ; ; , :A. .B. , , . 13. ;13 14. ;14 15. ;15 . . , . kplakits@cc.uoi.grTo , . . , , , , . , , , , , , / . - . : , , . . , . , , , . , . , , , . , o : . .. : , () 16. ;16 ., (Aikenhead, Ogawa, 2007). , . , . , , (, ), , - . , . , minds on hands on . , , . : - ( ) ( . 10-18) . . , , . , , , , . : , , , , , . (, , , ..), ( , ,, ..), (-, , , ..), ( , , ..). , - . , , , . . , , , . , - 17. ;17 , . . , :() , (, , , , ..) , ( , , , ..).() , (.. , - , ..). , , . . , , . (jigsaw), , (brainstorming), (projects), (scaffolding learning), / , . , / , / , , , , .. . , , , , . , , , , . , , , , , . . , . 18. ;18 ., . , , , . , . , , : , , (, , ). ( , ) , . , , . (. 1-2) , . : , . , ( 1). , , , . 19. ;19 1: , , . , , , : (, , , , , ,, , , ) (, , , MP3 Player, , , ) (, , , , , ) (, , ,, , , , ) ( , ,, ). . , , , , / . 9 . , (, 2012).,,,, 20. ;20 2: , , . , , , .. . Vygotsky . - , Vygotsky (Vygotsky, 1978, Engestrm, 1987). , , (, ). . 21. ;21 () 3. :: .. , , , , : , , , : .. , : , , , , , : vs .: , , : , , , , , 3, ( ) (, ..) ( , ) , , ( , ..), ( - ). , . . , . , . . , , , . . - , Leontev (1978) , . 3: Engestrm (1987) 22. ;22 , . , , . . . ( 3). (Engestrm 1999, Rizzo, 2003):) ) (Multivoicedness, )) ( ) . , . Engestrm (1999) (expansive cycle). ( 4) : (internalization) (externalization). .) (Basharina, 2007).) . Engestrm(1999) . . .35 (EXPANSIVE CYCLE)Engestrom, 1999& , , ,,,, , & , , ,, ,, ,, , , , ,, , 4: 23. ;23 , . . , . , . , , , , .. , , , . ( ) (.. ), (.. ) . , (, , , , ,, , , ) ( -, -, - , -, ). - , . ., . . . : . . , , , , , , , Galvani Volta, . , . , , . , Oersted. , . , , Faraday , . : , , . , , 24. ;24 , . , , (), , (.. kidspiration) (.. audacity). : , (.. ), (.. ), (.. ), , . , (.. -), , , , . , , . , , , , , , . , , . , . . , , , . . , , , , (.. mp3). . , . . . , . . , . . , . . , , , . . , , , , , , , , .1. Aikenhead, G.S., Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies ofScience Education, 2:539620. doi: 10.1007/s11422-007-9067-8 25. ;252. Basharina, O. (2007) Activity theory perspectives on student-reported tensions in internationaltelecollaboration. Language Learning and Technology. 11 (2), 82-103.3. Engestrm, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmentalresearch. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.4. Engestrm, Y. (1999) Innovative learning in work teams: analysing cycles of knowledge creation inpractice, in: Y. ENGESTRM et al (Eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory, (Cambridge, CambridgeUniversity Press), 377-406.5. Leontev, A. N., (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.6. Rizzo, A. (2003). Activity Centered Professional Development and Teachers Take-Up of ICT, paperwas presented at the IFIP Working Groups 3.1 and 3.3 Working Conference: ICT and the Teacher ofthe Future, held at St. Hildas College, The University of Melbourne, Australia 27th31st January,2003.7. Vygotsky, L., (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.8. , ., , ., , ., , ., , ., ,., , ., , ., , ., , ., , ., (2011). . : http://digitalschool.minedu.gov.gr/ http://www.meletiperivallontos.gr/9. , ., , ., , ., , ., , ., ,., , ., , ., , ., , ., , ., (2011). . : http://digitalschool.minedu.gov.gr/ http://www.meletiperivallontos.gr/10. , ., , ., , ., , ., , ., ,., , ., , ., , ., , ., , ., (2011). . . : http://digitalschool.minedu.gov.gr/ http://www.meletiperivallontos.gr/. , .11. , ., , ., , ., , ., , ., ,., , ., , ., , ., , ., , ., (2011). . . : http://digitalschool.minedu.gov.gr/ http://www.meletiperivallontos.gr/12. , . (2012). . ...1. . : http://www.pi-schools.gr/software/dimotiko/2. , ., , ., , ., , ., , . (2008) (. 62/2065), . , / / .. .. & / . :http://www.meletiperivallontos.gr/3. Materials Science Project (2011). University-school partnerships for the design and implementation ofresearch-based ICT-enhanced modules on Material Properties. :http://lsg.ucy.ac.cy/materialsscience/teaching_modules.htm.4. Materials Science Project (2010). /: . : : http://ekdidyma.web.uowm.gr/?q=physics/innovations/pv http://lsg.ucy.ac.cy/materialsscience/teaching_modules.htm5. , . (2011) ( ). . . : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coWQ1R2r5MY 26. ;26 27. ;27H (;) 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 21 2 , , , . 21 , , , , , . , , . , . : , , , , , ( ) , , () , , , (, 2011) , ,, , ( , 2011). , , , , , .( , 2006). (, , ), - (, , ). , , , , , UNESCO 21 . , . . , . , , , , , , , .. 28. ;28, UNESCO (2008): . , , , , , . .. 21 (2008): , , .. ( , 2010), , . , , , , ( , 1988-1990 ). , . ( , 2010) , , . , , , . , . . , , (2-6), , , ( ), (, , ), , , , , (, , ), , , . , . , , , . ( -, , ) , , . , , . , : . , , . , . , , , , ., . 3 . . . , 3 . . . ! , . . (2011) , 29. ;29, - , . , . , . , . , , ; ; , , . , (.) . , . . .. - . . 7 . ( 6 1 2 ) , 4 . 4 4, . 3 1 , 2 . 6 7(2 3 ), (Baccalaureat Europeen), 4 , ( 4 ). , ( 1), 1 1. , , 2. ( , , , , )3. (, , 4. 5. 922 1. 2. 3. 923 1. , 2. 3. ( , )924 1. : , , 2. 3. : 4. 5. 6. 7. 465 1. : , , , 2. : , , 3. 4. 5. 6. 47 30. ;307. 6 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 927 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 92 1: (Saarikko, 2010): ( 1 9), ( 10 12), (3 + 2 ) . 60 % . . . . . . : ( ) 2, 25 . 1, -, 1 . , . 2009 . : , , 1, 5 , 1 . ( 1,5 / 2 / , 3 2 , . ., / , . , (Saarikko, 2010, Stl, 2012). : , 8 ( 2) 7 , . 8 . . , , 1+4, 2+3 2+2, . 38 (Finnish national board of Education, 2012) 31. ;31 ( ) , , , , , , , , ; , , , , ; , , 32. ;32 Ohm Joule , , Kirchhoff Coulomb, , , , eddy, , ,, - , , , ; ; . 2: , , . . , , . ., , . , .., , , . , 33. ;33, , . , , . , ( et al., 2008), , 2008, 2010, 2011 , .1. -, , . (2006). , , , .2. , ., , ., , ., , ., , ., , ., ., , . (2008). , , , 105 .3. (19881990). . . , 18191820, , . 7307484. (2008). : http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/2008.5. Finnish National board of Education (2012). National Core Curriculum for Upper Secondary Schools2003. :http://www.oph.fi/english/education/general_upper_secondary_education/curriculum.6. (2010). , 1899-1999, , :www.pi-schools.gr.7. (2011) , : , , .8. Saarikko, H., (2010). . 13 . 17-21 2010. : http://www.trapeza-thematvn-fysikhs-eef.gr/patra2010/Saarikko-%CF%83%CF%87%CF%8C%CE%BB%CE%B9%CE%B1.pdf9. Stl, Ingvar 2012. Teaching Sciences in the Finnish Compulsory School (Physics, Chemistry, Biologyand Geography). ISETL, School of Education, University of Glasgow. :http://artofteachingscience.org/countries/Edsystemfinland.pdf10. , . (2011). , , , , .11. (2011). : . http://www.ypepth.gr/docs/neo_sxoleio_brochure_100305.pdf.12. UNESCO, (2008). Science Education Programme. :http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/priority-areas/science-education/about-the-programme/. 34. ;34 35. ;35 : , , koumaras@eled.auth.gr . . , , . . , , . , , . , , . , , . : , - , . 1999, 2003, . , , . , , . : ; ; .. , ; , ; , 1%, , , . , o , . . , TIMSS PISA, , , , , , , . ICMAS, ( , 2002, 2007). ICMAS : Intention, Content, Methodology, Assessment, Support, (, ,, , ) - . : ) ; ) ;) ; ) , ; ) ; , ICMAS , , 1. 36. ;36 . 1 , , . 1 . . , , . 1 . (.. , I 1) (., , C A 1 ) ( 2006). 1: ICMAS, (, 2011) , , . . . : (Dryden, 1991, .3) , ( 2002). ( 1 test ), . ICMAS : (1). - (2). (,). (, ) 37. ;37 , . . , . ; . , , , . (3). . : , ; ; (Westera, 2001; Wesseling et al.,2010; New Zealand Ministry of Education, 2006; OECD, 2003; European Commision, 2002) (competence) , , , , , , . ( , ) , . , .., (, , ), , , () ( ). , . . Westera (2001) , ( 1). 1: , . , -, . - , (,2010). - , , (Han, 2008). , , .. , ( ), .., . - : 1) ,2) , 3) , 4) , 5) 6) . , 38. ;38 (, , 2011, , , , 2010). , . , - . , , :1. , , 2. , , ( ) (.. , , ).3. 4. , ( ...) ,5. 6. , 7. . 8. , 9. . . . , (, , 2011, , ,, 2010). , ( ). 1. () (1 ) : , . ( , ). ( , ), , , , , ( ). . , . , , . , .. 1 . . 39. ;39 , (, ). : , , ( ) , 2. 2 . , () ( ) . ( ) , . 2: , , . .. : : 20 . . . . , , , ( 4 ) : ( 2). : 1) , .. ( ), 2) : ( , ), , 3) , 4) , , . . , . , , , , . , , (, 2012). . , , . , ) , , ) . 40. ;40 , . , , . . , , , . , , , , ... ( 2) 2, , . . (, 2012). , , . . () . . . . , . , , ... , , . , , .2. (!), , , . : () , ( ). : (i) (ii) . , , , () . . , . , , , .. , .. . . . . , . () ( , ), . , , (. ) . , 41. ;41 , . ( ) . (. http://www.nap.pi.ac.cy). Projects , . , , Projects . .3. . . - quark. . . , , , . , . .. Boyle, Boyle ( ) . (Westfall, 1993, . 68). .4. . , .., , . . ( ) , . , Boyle. - , . . ,.. , . . , .5. (Newton Einstein) , . .. . , , . . . , ., . , . , ( 2004, 2006). , 42. ;42 . , . . , .. , , . http://www.nap.pi.ac.cy ( ) (, ., ,., . 2010 , ., , ., , . 2011).1. Dryden, G., (2001). Five Keys to Unlock the 21stCentury, in Breakthroughs 2001 Conference,Auckland2. European Commission (2002), The Key Competences in a Knowledge Based Economy: A First StepTowards Selection, Definition and Description, First progress report of the Commission Expert Groupon Basic skills, Foreign Language Teaching and Entrepreneurship3. Han, S. (2008), Competence: Commodification of Human Ability, Asia Pacific Education Review 9(31), 31-394. Harlen, W., Elstgeest, J., (2005). . . , .5. New Zealand Ministry of Education (2005), Key-Competencies: The New Zealand CurriculumMarautanga Project, Wellington, Learning media6. OECD (2003), Definition and Selection of Competencies: Theoritical and Conceptual Foundations(DeSeCo), Summary of the Final Report Key Competences for a Successful Life and Well FunctioningSociety, Paris, OECD7. Wesselink, R., Dekker-Groen, A., Biemans, H. and Mulder, M. (2010), Using an Instrument to AnaluseCompetence-Based Study Programmes: Experiences of Teachers in Dutch Vocational Education andTraining, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(6) p.p. 813-8298. Westera, W (2001), Competences in Education: A Confusion of Tongues, Journal of CurriculumStudies, 33(1), p.p. 75-789. Westfall 1993. . ,.10. , . (2007). , . , .11. , ., , . (2002), . , 126 . 103 - 118.12. 2012. . .13. , . (2003), . , .14. , ., , ., , . (2011), . II: . , .15. , ., , ., . (2010), . I: . , .16. (2010) http://www.nap.pi.ac.cy ( 2013)17. , ., , ., 2008. TIMSS-1995. . 4. . 2008.18. , ., , ., 2004. PIS & : ; . , .... 10, 13 20. . 19. , ., , ., 2006. - : . , 80, 10-15.20. , . (2002). . , .21. , . (2010). - . , . 43. ;43 1: . TIMSS 1995 (Trends in Mathematics Science Studies) . (2008). TIMSS 1995 10 ( 2008, . 144). . , . . . . , . ( ) ( ) ( ). . . Wynne Harlen Jos Elstgeest (2005) (. 255): Harlen &Elstgeest J.(2005 . : , , ; ; ; : . . . 5 , , .. . , . . : ; , , : , . .. ( ) 44. ;44. , . , . . 2: . : : . 1 , 1 , , 1 , , . : 20 . . . : . : , , ; 2; 3;123. , ( ). . . ; . . ; ; ;. , . . 2 : ;3 ( ):1: ( ) 2: 3: ( ) 45. ;45 . ; . . ; ; ;. 46. ;46 47. ;47 Hagop A. Yacoubian , , , , hagop.yacoubian@haigazian.edu.lb (....) .. . .... . .. .... .... -. .... ( CT-NOS). CT-NOS (1) .... - , (2) (3) .... . , Robert Ennis , CT-NOS. : .., , .., CT-NOS (....) .. (. CMEC, 1997; European Commission, 1995; NRC, 1996, 2012). .. (. AAAS, 1993; Bybee & DeBoer, 1994; Holman,1997; Laugksch, 2000; Lederman, 2004). .... .., .. , (Abd-El-Khalick & Lederman, 2000). .. .... .. (Matthews, 1994), .... - (Kolst, 2001a;Zeidler, Walker, Ackett, & Simons, 2002). , Driver Leach, Millar, Scott (1996) .... . .. - , .... ... .. .... .... - . .... .... ( CT-NOS). , . .. (. , Lederman, 2004; Osborne,Collins, Ratcliffe, Millar, & Duschl, 2003) .... .. . , Lederman 48. ;48 .... , , .. (Lederman 2004). .... .. (. Akerson, Abd-El-Khalick, & Lederman, 2000; Akerson, Buck,Donnelly, Narguand-Joshi, & Weiland, 2011; Khishfe, 2008; Khishfe & Abd-El-Khalick, 2002; Kim & Irving,2010; Paraskevopoulou & Koliopoulos, 2011). ...., .... ..... , .... . - (. , Driver, Leach, Millar, & Scott, 1996; Kolst,2001; Sadler & Zeidler, 2005). - , . .. , Driver .. (1996) .... .., . Kolst (2001) - . (. 292) .. , ... Kolst .. .. (. 291) - , ... Kolst .... -. , . .... - (. , Bell & Lederman,2003; Sadler & Zeidler, 2005; Zeidler, Walker, Ackett, & Simmons, 2002). .... - (. Bell & Lederman,2003). , .... - (Bell & Lederman, 2003; Khishfe, 2012; Zeidler et al., 2002). , Khishfe (2012) ...., - . .... , .. - . Khishfe , . , . .... ... .... ... .... .... -. .... .... .... , .... . .... - .... 49. ;49.... , - . , ....(. .... .... - ) ... (1) .... (2) .... - ., Khishfe (2012) . , , , ..... .... -, . Jimnez-Aleixandre Erduran (2008) .. . Ennis (1989, 1996a) (1989, . 4). Ennis (1996a) . .... .... , Khishfe (2012) . (Ennis, 1996a) - . Ennis (1996a) . Ennis (1996a) .. ...., .... ., . .... . (Ennis, 1989,1996a; Lipman, 2003; Siegel, 1988). .... - . . Lipman (2003), Siegel (1998), Ennis (1996a, 1996b) . , Ennis , . .... - , . .... . ...., - . .... .. .., 50. ;50 .... . .... , (1) .... ( ) .... , (2) - . .... ... CT-NOS . .... - ., ..... . CT-NOS CT-NOS4 . CT-NOS ...., . . . .. ... CT-NOS , , , . , , ... CT-NOS, .o 1 CT-NOS. .... - . .... .... . , . ( 1). .... ( .... ). (1) .... (2) ..... . .... ..... .... ..... .... .... . .... ( .... - ). (3) - (4) .... . .... . . .... .... . CT-NOS .4...: CT-NOS Critical Thinking Nature of Science. 51. ;51 1: CT-NOS . .... - . .... .... - . ...., Abd-El-Khalick (2012a) .. ..... : (1) , (2) , (3) , (4) , (5) , (6) (7) - . - , Zeidlerand Nichols (2009) . CT-NOS .... .... , , ...., - . , . .... -. . . . .... ..... .... .. .... . , 52. ;52 .... - . Ennis (1996a) . . Siegel (1988) Ennis , (1988, . 10). , Ennis , (1988, . 10). , CT-NOS. Ennis (1) ..,(2) .... (3) .... .. . ..... .... .... ( .... ). , , Ennis . , ..... (1) , .... (2) .... . .... . .... - . , , Ennis . , (1) , ...., (2) .... - (3) - . CT-NOS CT-NOS. .. - :.: ; . ...., , , . - . , ..... , . , . , . . . . .... .... . . , . 53. ;53, . - ....:2: ; .... , 2. , . , .... . , .... . 2 .. , 2 . .... . , 2 . :1: ; 1 . 1 .... ....., (1) 2 . . 1 2 Ennis . . . 1 . Ennis (1996a) . Ennis . 1. Ennis . : (1) , (2) , (3) , (4) , (5) , (6) (7) . . , - . . Ennis (1996, . 252) , , (1996, . 252). . , .... - . , 2. . 54. ;54 . , .. CT-NOS .... .., .... ... .. (, , ) , . .... .. (. Yacoubian & BouJaoude, 2010), (Bell, Blair,Crawford, & Lederman, 2003), .. (Schwartz, Lederman, & Crawford, 2004) .. (Akerson & Hanuscin, 2007). Abd-El-Khalick (2012b) .... ( , ) .. (. 1047). Abd-El-Khalick .... , , , , ., .... .... Abd-El-Khalick (2012b). .... ...., .... . ..... CT-NOS . .... . (. , Duschl, Schweingruber, & Shouse 2007; Keating 1988; King & Kitchener 1994; Kuhn 1999;Nicoll 1996).E .... ( CT-NOS) (1) .... - , (2) (3) .... . CT-NOS . CT-NOS .... ... .. .... .... . Ennis (1996a), CT-NOS . , .... ..... .1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012a). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: Enduringconflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. InternationalJournal of Science Education, 34, 353-374. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.629013 55. ;552. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012b). Nature of science in science education: Towards a coherent framework forsynergistic research and development. In B.J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Secondinternational handbook of science education (pp. 1041-1060). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_693. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on studentsviews of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1057-1095. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:103.0.CO;2-C4. Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicitactivity-based approach on elementary teachers conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Researchin Science Teaching, 37, 295-317. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:43.0.CO;2-25. Akerson, V. L., Buck, G. A., Donnelly, L. A., Narguand-Joshi, V., & Weiland, I. S. (2011). Theimportance of teaching and learning nature of science in early childhood years. Journal of ScienceEducation and Technology, 20, 537-549. doi: 10.1007/s10956-011-9312-56. Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 653-680. doi:10.1002/tea.201597. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for scienceliteracy: A Project 2061 report. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement ofScience.8. Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it! Impact of ascience apprenticeship program on high school students understandings of the nature of science andscientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487-509. doi: 10.1002/tea.100869. Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making onscience and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352-377. doi: 10.1002/sce.1006310. Bybee, R., & DeBoer, G. E. (1994). Research on goals for the science curriculum. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.),Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 357-387). New York: Macmillan.11. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC). (1997). Common Framework of Science LearningOutcomes: Pan-Canadian Protocol for Collaboration on School Curriculum (Toronto: Council ofMinisters of Education, Canada). Accessed online at http://publications.cmec.ca/science/framework/12. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young Peoples Images of Science. Philadelphia:Open University Press.13. Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking Science to School: Learning andTeaching Science in Grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning, National Research Council.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.14. Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research.Educational Researcher, 18, 4-10. doi: 10.3102/0013189X01800300415. Ennis, R. H. (1996a). Critical Thinking. NJ: Prentice Hall.16. Ennis, R.H. (1996b). Critical thinking dispositions: Their nature and assessability. Informal Logic, 18,165-182.17. European Commission (1995). Teaching and learning: Towards the learning society. White paper oneducation and training [COM (95) 590]. Brussels: European Commission.18. Holman, J. (1997). The national curriculum: A golden opportunity for scientific literacy. In W. Graber& C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literary: An international symposium (pp. 275-285). Kiel, Germany,Institut fur die Padagogik der Naturwissebschaften.19. Jimnez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education: An overview. InS. Erduran & M. P. Jimnez-Aleixandre (Eds), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives fromclassroom-based research. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-220. Keating, D. P. (1988). Adolescents ability to engage in critical thinking. [S.l.]: Distributed by ERICClearinghouse.21. Khishfe, R. (2008). The development of seventh graders views of nature of science. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 45, 470-496. doi: 10.1002/tea.2023022. Khishfe, R. (2012). Nature of science and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education,34, 67-100. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.55949023. Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders views of nature of science. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 39, 551-578. doi: 10.1002/tea.1003624. Kim, S. Y., & Irving, K. E. (2010). History of science as an instructional context: Student learning ingenetics and nature of science. Science & Education, 19, 187-215. doi: 10.1007/s11191-009-9191-925. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promotingintellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 56. ;5626. Kolst, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension ofcontroversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291-310. doi: 10.1002/sce.101127. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28, 16-25+46.doi: 10.3102/0013189X02800201628. Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71-94. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:13.0.CO;2-C29. Lederman, N. G. (2004). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In L. B.Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 301-317). Dordrecht:Kluwer.30. Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. 2ndEd., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.31. Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. NY:Routledge.32. National Research Council [NRC] (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC:National Academic Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=496233. National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices,crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=1316534. Nicoll, B. (1996). Developing minds: Critical thinking in k-3. Paper presented at the CaliforniaKindergarten Conference, San Francisco, CA. Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse.35. Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ideas-about-scienceshould be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research inScience Teaching, 40, 692-720. doi: 10.1002/tea.1010536. Paraskevopoulou, E., & Koliopoulos, D. (2011). Teaching the nature of science through the Millikan-Ehrenhaft dispute. Science & Education, 20, 943-960. doi: 10.1007/s11191-010-9308-137. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientificdecision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 112138. doi: 10.1002/tea.2004238. Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science inan authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientificinquiry. Science Education, 88, 610-645. doi: 10.1002/sce.1012839. Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: rationality, critical thinking, and education. New York:Routledge.40. Yacoubian, H. A., & BouJaoude, S. (2010). The effect of reflective discussions following inquiry-basedlaboratory activities on students views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,47, 1229-1252. doi: 10.1002/tea.2038041. Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal ofElementary Science Teacher Education, 21, 49-58. doi: 10.1007/BF0317368442. Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs inthe nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86, 343-367. doi:10.1002/sce.10025 57. ;57 1 58. ;58 59. ;59 :-- -; , , , gtseper@cc.uoi.gr (..) , .., .., , . ., .., . ) . .. . , - , ( 21 ) . . : , , (..) . . , .. (, ) , 9% ( , 2003). . .. . .. . , , ( ) (Tsaparlis, 2007). . ( ), . , . , .. , , ( & , 2007). , .. , , , .. . , .., , . , - .: , .. H , . Keith Taber(Taber, 2013) AlexJohnstone. 60. ;60 Johnstone (1982, p. 377) , . , Johnstone(1989, 1991, 2000), ( 1) , . (.. , ), ( ) ( , ). 1: . Johnstone .. , .. . , .. . Johnstone, , (.. ) (.. ). ( ), () / . , Johnstone (2007) ( 2): , . , . /, . , , . 61. ;61 2: . .. ( Piaget , Ausubel, ) (T, 1994, Tsaparlis, 1997). A (Taber, 2013). , , . : . ( ) , ( , , , ). / ( , , , ...), . , . , - , ( /), . , : ( ) . . , , -, -, , .. .. , (. 1 2)., , (Gilbert & Treagust, 2009) (Treagust & Tsui, 2013). ) ) . .. . (.. ) .. , / . , (Tsaparlis, 2007). (.. , ,) . .. ( ). (), 62. ;62 , . . , (.. ) . , , , , . 11 . , (..) , .. , .., , . , , . . , . .. ( ), - . , . , . .. , .. , , ., ( ). , 2/3 , , . , : : 2/3 , 2/3 , 2/3 ( 2 ). .. : 1 , 1 , 1 ( 2 , 1 , 0 ). . : 2 , 1 , 2 ( ). : 3 2/3 , 2 2/3 , 3 2/3 (: 4 , 2 , 4 ). 1/3 1/3 . ( ) , ...( & , 2011). o (-), () . ( & , 2003). (. 1). 1998-99 1999-2000 11 ( 30 , 1300 ), , / . : , ", . 63. ;63 1: . ( .) . 1 , , ( / ). 3 , , , . 2 . , . - .. ( 1991, 1998, Tsaparlis &Kampourakis 2000). ( Bruner), Ausubel, , / . - (Niaz 1993, Tsaparlis 1997).: 1) ( )2) , 3) : - 4. : - 5. : 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. : 13. 14.15. , , 16. - - 17. 18. : 19. 20. : 21. 22. 23. - : 24. 25. .26. --27. 28. : 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. : 34. 35. 36. - 37. : - 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. : 43. 44. 45. - 46. - : 47. : 48. - 49. 50. 64. ;64 3: , , . : , . 65. ;653. : ; 7. + + + ( ) 11. + + , +18. + + + +22. () ( ) ( ) 30. 31. ( ) +: +32. , +36. 37. ( ) ( ) ( )42. : : ( ) 46. -- ( ) ( ) , +50. + + + 2: / .** ( ), +. , 1 , . , , . , , . A , , -, , , 66. ;66 . ( , , ) ( , -, -, ). . . , , , . . (, ..). . , .. /. , , , . , , . , . , , . , . , , . , . , . , ( & , , , 2013).-- -; .. [ ( 21 ), ] -- , ), , , ( - ). . , , . ( , , , ) , , . 2. . , , . , . , , ., , . -- . ( ) . 67. ;67 . , , . .. , .. ., , , 1. (2003). . . .2. . & . (2011). . 7 ( ,, 2011) http://www.7sefepet.gr3. . & . (2013). : . 8 ( , , 26-28 2013)4. , . (1991). . , .5. , . (1994). : . 4 - , . 8-24. - .6. . (1998). - . 1 , . 535-540. .7. ., ., (2007). , , - , . 5 ,5(B), 661-670. [http://www.kodipheet.gr]8. . & . (2003). (-) . .9. Gilbert J. K. and Treagust D. F., (ed.), (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education.Springer, Dordrecht.10. Johnstone A. H., (1982). Macro- and microchemistry. School Science Review, 64(227), 377379.11. Johnstone A. H., (1989). Somemessages for teachers and examiners: an information processing model,Assessment of Chemistry in Schools, vol. Research in Assessment VII, Royal Society of ChemistryEducation Division, London, pp. 2339.12. Johnstone A. H., (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? things are seldom what they seem. Journalof Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 7583.13. Johnstone A. H., (2000). Teaching of chemistry logical or psychological Chemistry EducationResearch and Practice, 1, 915.14. Johnstone, A. H. (2007). Science education: We know the answers, lets look at the problems.( : , .) 5 ,5(), 1-13.[http://www.kodipheet.gr/fifth_conf/pdf_synedriou/teyxos_A/1_kentrikes_omilies/1_KO-4-Johnstone.pdf]15. Niaz, M.. (1993). Progressive problem shifts between different research programs in scienceeducation: A Lakatosian perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 757-765.16. Taber K. S. (2013). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledgeand the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research andPractice, DOI: 10.1039/c3rp00012e17. Treagust D. F., Tsui C.-Y.(eds.) (2013). Multiple representations in biological education. Springer,Dordrecht. ISBN 978-94-007-4192-8. 68. ;6818. Tsaparlis G. (1997). Atomic and molecular structure in chemical education - A critical analysis fromvarious perspectives of science education. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 922-925.19. Tsaparlis G. (2007). The rivalry among the separate science subjects for dominance in secondaryeducation: The case of Greece and beyond. In R.K. Coll and N. Taylor (Eds.), Education in context - Aninternational perspective of the influence of context on science curriculadevelopment, andimplementation. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam/Taipei.20. Tsaparlis G. & Kampourakis . (2000). An integrated physical-science (physics and chemistry)introduction for lower-secondary level (grade 7). Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1, 281-294 [http://www.rsc.org/cerp & http://www.uoi.gr/cerp]. 1: , 6: , - (). . E , 1.4: , , , / . , - , , . .. , , , . . 2: 1 . T . : . . . .( : . . . . . , . . , , . , , .) 2 . . . ( .) 3 . . , . ( .) 69. ;69 ; ,, , , . , , , , . , . , , ; ; ; ; , . , , , . , . : . , , , , . , , , , . , , , . .. , , ;. ;. ;. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; :. . . , , . 70. ;70 , , . , , :1. , . . , . - , , - . , . . , , .2. , , . . Fg =mg, = m/V, p= F/A, p2 - p1 = gh, A = gV, Boyle Mariote p1V1 = p2V2 , Q = mc. . x = t, W = F x = W/t , =m2 U = mgh , = q/t V = W/q, = VI , Ohm I = V/R, , = f.3. , , , - , .4. , , - - - , , , , . , , , - .5. , . , , . . , - , .6. , , .7. 71. ;718. :. . . . . projects 9. competances - .10. : - - - - , . 46 .11. , , . . , , , . . , , , , ., . . , . . . . - . 2 3 . . ., :. . . . . . , , : . rigid body, . . 72. ;72 - . . - , , . . .H , . . , , . , , . . - . . , , .. . . . . :. . .. . , 1 kg. = : Fg = mg. , 1 / kg, 10 / kg, . . . Newton Principia . . , . ( ) Newton Principia . . , - - - ( ) ( ) . . . . . . . . David Scott . . . 100 - 100 . 73. ;73 , - . . :. . , , , . . - . : = . F = pA, p . . F = pA p = F/A . p = F/A ; . . - . . ( ) , . ( ) . . , . . . .. . . . . , . , , , , , , . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . , . 74. ;74 . . . . . , . . W = F x. . . . . . Joule. . . . ENNOIA . , . , , . . . , . - , - . . . . - transfer , . . - . . , . , . . . . , . . . Joule. - , - . , , . . . . . 75. ;75 . , , , , . . , , . , . - - , , , , , . . 20 - , , ., , . , . . . . . , , - , , , -. , - . . . . . . . . . . - - . , . Crookes. , . : - - . . , , . -. 1 6 2 8 3 8 4 10 5 9 6 5 1 4 2 7 76. ;76 3 14 4 15 5 6 77. ;77 : ( ),nikanderakis@yahoo.gr . , , . , , . . , , . . , , . . , . ; , , . . , , . , . , . , . . ( ) . , , , , , . , .. , (Lindberg 1997, 2003). 17 , , () , ( ) . (, , ), . , (Galileo 1978). , , , . ( Principia) , : ( ) (Westfall 1983). 18 , (Varignon, Johann Daniel Bernoulli,Clairaut, dAlembert, Euler, Lagrange .) 78. ;78, . , ( .. ), (Ravetz 1961). , , u tdu1:du2 :: 1:2dt1:dt2 , du1/du2 = 1/2dt1/dt2. , , . .. du = dt , , . dAlembert .., u = de/dt , e , :, , , , , (dAlembert 1758 . 16). 18 19 , (.. Euler), , . . , , . ( ) , , . . ( ) , . .. . , (.. ), , - (..) (Lemke 2002, Pietrocola 2008)., . , . ; . , . , (Osborne & Collins 2004,Carlone 2003, Angell et al 2004, Angell et al 2008). ; (Angell et al 2008) . , , , , . - . Angell, Guttersrud, Henriksen & Isnes (2004), . , . , , . . Tuminaro (2004), . : , , . , : ( ), . .. F=ma . . . 79. ;79 - . .. PV=nRT : , . . .. . , Karam Pietrocola , : . , . . (Karam &Pietrocola 2009). Bagno, Berger Eylon (2008) . . , x = xo+vot+1/2at2 F = ma , : (.. vot), , . : . .. F F = ma . . .. x = xo+vot+1/2 at2 . . , . . . ; , . , . . 70, Richard Skemp . , ( , ). , , . , , (Skemp 1976). - . , . . , , , , . . , Uhden Pospiech (2010) , . : i. ii. (.. vo=0) iii. 80. ;80 iv. (.. ). , . . Edward Redish (2005) . ( ):i. (.. 5x = 20), . , s = vt , .ii. , .iii. . . .iv. . .. , . , .v. . , . , Redish Gupta (2010) , Evans Green (2006), . . Redish Gupta . Redish Gupta, : . .. , , , , . (context). . . ( ) ( ). .. ( 2 ), . , . . . , . , . , . . , , , . 81. ;81 , , ( ) . , , (Cartwright 1983, Hendry & Psillos 2007). (.. , , ), . : , , , , . , , , . , (Redish 2005). ( ) : ( + 82. ;82) (Blum & Borromeo Ferri 2009). , , ( , , ) , (Karam & Pietrocola 2009, Karam et al 2010). : : . : . : . , (.. v/t) . . (Karam et al 2010). . ( ), , , ( ), . (.. ) ( ) . , . , Claudio Amorim (2006) (fill and drill). - - , , , . - - ( ) ( ), . . , . , . : , , , . , , , . , : , . ; , : . , Bagno, Berger Eylon (2008) Uhden Pospiech (2010) , . . : . (.. at , ). . . . . . .. s = gt2 v0 = 0 g = . . 83. ;83 . , ( ), , ( ). , .. , . ( ): . ( ), . , . . . , , : .1. D Alembert, J.R. (1758), Trait de dynamique (2 d.), David Libraire, Paris, fac-sim par J. Gabay(ed.), 1990.2. Amorim, C. (2006). Beyond algorithmic thinking: An old new challenge for science education. Theproceedings of the eighth international conference for the history, philosophy and science teaching,August 2005, Leeds.3. Angell, C., Guttersrud, O., Henriksen, E. & Isnes A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but fun. Pupilsteachers views of physics and physics teaching. Science Education, 88, 683-706.4. Angell, C., Kind, P.M., Henriksen, E. & Guttersrud, O (2008). An empirical-mathematical modelingapproach to upper secondary physics. Physics Education, 43 (3), 256-264.5. Bagno, E., Berger, H. & Eylon, B. (2008). Meeting the challenge of students understanding of formulain high-school physics: a learning tool. Physics Education, 43 (1), 75-82.6. Blum, W. & Borromeo Ferri, R. (2009). Mathematical modeling: Can it be taught and learnt? Journal ofMathematical Modelling and Application, 1 (1), 45-58.7. Carlone, H. (2003). Innovative science within and against a culture of achivement. Science Education,87, 307-328.8. Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. Oxford University Press, Oxford.9. Evans, V. & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press,Edinburgh.10. Galileo, G. (1978). Dialogues concerning the two new sciences, transl. by H. Grew & A. de Salvio. Great books of the western world: Gilbert, Galileo, Harvey, 129-260, Encyclopaedia Britannica,Chicago.11. Hendry, R. & Psillos, S. (2007). How to do things with theories: An interactive view of language andmodels in science. Brzeziski, J., Klawiter, A., Kuipers, T.A.F., Lastowski, K., Paprzycka, K. &Przybysz, P. (eds.), The Courage of Doing Philosophy: Essays Dedicated to Leszek Nowak, 59-115,Rodopi, Amsterdam.12. Karam, R. & Pietrocola, M. (2009). Recognizing the structural role of mathematics in physical thought. Tasar, M.F. & Cakmaki, G. (eds), Contemporary science education research: internationalperspectives, A collection of papers presented at ESERA 2009 conference, 65-76, Istanbul.13. Karam, R., Pospiech, G. & Pietrocola, M. (2010). Mathematics in physics lessons: Developingstructural skills. Symposium: Addressing the role of mathematics in physics education, GIREP2010, Reims.14. Lemke, J. (2002). Mathematics in the middle: measure, picture, gesture, sign, and word. Anderson,M., Saenz-Ludlow, A., Zellweger, S. & Cifarelli, V. (eds), Educational perspectives on mathematics:From thinking to interpreting to knowing, 215-234, Legas Publishing, Ottava.15. Lindberg, D. (1997). . ..., .16. Osborne, J. & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils views of the role and value of the science curriculum: a focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23 (5), 441-467.17. Pietrocola, M. (2008). Mathematics as structural language of physical thought. Vicentini, M. &Sassi E. (eds), Connecting research in physics education with teacher education, InternationalCommission on Physics Education, 18. http://web.phys.ksu.edu/icpe/Publications/teach2/index.html19. Ravetz, J. (1961). The representation of physical quantities in eighteenth-century mathematical physics.Isis, 52, 7-20. 84. ;8420. Redish, E. (2005). Problem solving and the use of math in physics courses. Proceedings of theconference World view on physics education in 2005: Focusing on change, Delhi, August 2005.21. Redish, E. & Gupta, A. (2010). Making meaning with maths in physics: a semantic analysis. Physics community and cooperation, vol. 1, GIREP conference proceedings, Leister UK, August 2009,244-260.22. Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching,77, 20-26.23. Tuminaro, J. (2004). A cognitive framework for analyzing and describing introductory students useand understanding of mathematics in physics. Dissertation, University of Maryland.24. Uhden, O. & Pospiech, G. (2010). Translating between mathematics and physics: Analysis of studentsdifficulties. GIREP 2010, Teaching and learning physics today: Challenges? Benefits? Reims,France, August 2010.25. , . (2003). . , .26. Westfall, R. (1983). Never at rest: a biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge. 85. ;85 andreasvaladakis@gmail.com . . , . : , , , , , , , . (, 1623): , , . , . , . . . 1 . . ; , . . 2 . , . , . 1 2 86. ;86, , . 1638 (, 1638): . :: ( ) "", , [] . 1 2, , 1 , 2 . , . , . . . . (): " , , ... , "" . . . . . . , moto lineare - - moto circolare - ." . (, 1638):"... ." : . 3 (, 1638) , . . 3 87. ;87 , . 4 . , , . . . , , . , . 1 ( 5). , : , . . t(s) x(m)0 00,5 0,501 0,81,5 1,482 1,8 1 5 4 88. ;88 . , . , , , .1. Forinash K., Rumsey W., Lang C. (2000). Galileo Mathematical Language of Nature. Science andEducation 9(449-456)2. Galileo, G. (1623). Ill Saggiatore. ( Drake, S).http://www.stanford.edu/~jsabol/certainty/readings/Galileo-Assayer.pdf3. Galileo, G. (1638). Discorsi e Dimostrationi Matematiche Intorno a due Nuoue Scienze( Crew, H. & de Salvio, A.)4. . . http://users.sch.gr/kassetas/xGalileos%20Experiment.htm 89. ;89 , Dr. phil., develaki@otenet.gr , , , . , , . : , , , , (,, ), , - , , , , .. , , . , , , (.. Matthews 1994, Bybee1997, Clough 2006, MacComas 2008, Lederman 1992). , ; , , . , , . , Giere (2001), , , . - , , , , , . 20 : , ; ; - ; 90. ;90- . , ; ( ), , , . , - , .. , , , (. Grandy & Duschl 2007). . , , , , . ( ) , , , . , , . , - : (), (), , , ; , , () . , , , . - , ., , . (.. ) , , / . , , , , (, , , , .), - ( , .) (Lakatos 1974, Kuhn1989). Giere (1999) , , , . - , (. .. Suppe 1977, Giere 1988, 1999,Nersessian 2005, Develaki 2007). . , (. , , , ...). , , , , , (Giere 1999, Nola 2004). , . : ( ), (, , , ); (. 3). 91. ;91 , , . - , . , , (.. -). , / ; , , (. Giere 2001, Bttcher & Meisert 2011). - . , : , . , , , , (.. Nersessian 2005). , , . /, , , (. Duschl & Grandy 2005). , , .. , , (.. Newton 1999). - - , - , , , , (Giere 1999). , . ( , .. F=ma) , / , .( , -- , .) () , ( , , , , .), , . / , , . .. F=ma F=-Dx. , , . x , . . . (.. ), . ( .. .) , . , , , . 92. ;92 GIERE Giere -. Giere (2001) DNA (Watson Crick), ( 1, 2). , DNA Franklin DNA ( ). , , , , x DNA ( ), . , , . , . - 1: DNA 2: DNA , Giere , (, ), (, ), ( ). 93. ;93 , ( 3). 3: (Giere 2001) . (. 3) , , : , , , . , (. 3). , . , , . , . , , . , . , , , , . , , ( ). , ( ). , , .. , . 94. ;94 , , , . , , , , , , , . . , . , , . , Giere (2001) - , , -, , . - (, , ), , . - .1. Bttcher, F. & Meisert, A. (2011). Argumentation in Science Education: A model-based Framework.Science & Education 20 (2), 104-140.2. Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Heilmann: Portsmouth.3. Clough, M. P.: 2006, Learners Responses to the Demands of Conceptual Change: Considerations forEffective Nature of science Instruction. Science & Education 15 (5), 463-494.4. Develaki, M. (2007). The model-based view of scientific theories and the structuring of school scienceProgrammes. Science & Education, 16(7), 725749.5. Develaki, M. (2008). Social and ethical dimension of the natural sciences, complex problems of the age,interdisciplinarity, and the contribution of education. Science & Education, 17(89), 873888.6. Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining Science. A Cognitive Approach, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.7. Giere, R. N. (1999). Science without Laws, Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.8. Giere, R.N. (2001). A new Framework for teaching Scientific Reasoning. Argumentation 15, 21-33.9. Grandy, R.E. & Duschl, R.A. (2007), Reconsidering the Character and Role of Inquiry in SchoolScience: Analysis of a Conference, Science & Education, 16 (No. 2), 141-166.10. Kuhn, T. S. (1989). Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen, (10. Aufl.), Suhrkamp-Taschenbuch,Frankfurt am Main.11. Lakatos, . (1974). Falsifikation und die Methodologie wissenschaftlicher Forschungsprogramme. In I.Lakatos and A. Musgrave (Eds.), Kritik und Erkenntnisfortschritt, pp. 89-189, Vieweg, Braunschweig.12. Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students and Teachers Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of theResearch. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.13. Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching, NewYork: Routledge.14. McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science.Science & Education, 17 (2-3), 249-263.15. Nola, R. (2004). Pendula, Models, Constructivism and Reality. Science & Education, 13, 349-377.16. Nersessian, . (2005). How science works, NSF Inquiry Conference Proceedings,http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~rgrandy/NSFConSched.html.17. Newton P., Driver R. & Osborne J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of schoolscience. International Journal of Science education, 21 (5), 553-576.18. Suppe F. (1977). The Structure of Scientific Theories (second edition), University of Illinois Press,Urbana and Chicago. 95. ;95 ( ) : ; . : , . . , , , . . ( ) . : , , . ., 1964, . , ..., , . , , : (, , ), 1964. , , , , .: 20 10 . , . (, 10 ). ( ) , . 1978 , : , () , . - ( ) , . . , . , . 2 . 96. ;96 . , , . - 1978. , , 1964. , , . , 1964, 16, . ..., . ( ) . , ..., 11 . , : ( ) . , , , ( ) . , 1964 1978, . 1978 . 90 , . . 30 . 2. 2; ( ) . , , ( ), , . , . , ! ( ) , ; ; . 500 , 1000 . , ., , ., , . , ( ) ., , , , , , . - - , , . ;, . 1978 - . . , , . , 1978. . . , :, . . . , . . - , , , . , . 97. ;97 . (1983-2000). Faraday : () --, . . ; , , . , :. ( ) . . . .. . . , . , . ... Lorentz, . . , ... , , . . , , : , ... , , ( ) ... , , . , . . . , . , . , , . . , 104 N/m 1kg , , , . , , . , . , , . ( ), ., 1985 , ,, . . . ; , , ( ). , . 98. ;98. . . ( ) : , . . , . . 1 , . : . 2 . , , . . , ( 2 ). ( ), . , , . 99. ;99 1 100. ;100 101. ;101 . / PhD & MSc. & -Email: karid@otenet.gr 1980 () . (ScientificLiteracy) . , . . : ) , ) ) . : , & 20 . , , . ,, . 1980 /5 , (Hodson, 1993 &, 2001). . ( 20 1960), ( 1960 1980), ( 1980 ) ... (, 2001). ()6 / . , . , , . 21 (Kirkham 1989, Osborne & Millar 1998).5 60 PSSC (MITs Physical Sciences Study Committee) Nuffield .6 . . (.. , , , ...), , , . 102. ;102 , . ( & 2007). : 21 . (EuropeanCommission 1993, OECD 1997). : (Scientific literacy). , . , , (Aikenhead 1994, Millar 1996, Osborne 2000, Sjoberg 1997, Karidas & Koumaras 2001, & 2003, 2006, 2012). . (: Solomon & Aikenhead 1994, Bybee 1997, DeBoer 1997, Millar & Osborne 1998, Hodson 1999,Fensham 2002, Roth & Desautels 2002). , . -- (STS) (Aikenhead 1994, Solomon 1993), Project 2061 (AAAS, 1989), Project 2000+ UNESCO (Unesco, 1994), PISA (OECD/PISA 2003), ( , 2010) .. ( & 2003, 2007):1. ( )2. 3. 4. , 5. (.. , ...) 6. (.. , , , , ...) . , , . .. , ... , , (.. , ,) ... : (..) . 103. ;103 : ; (Osborne2000, 2003, & 2005) : ., ;7. . (Dewey 1933, 1994, , 2006, Alsop et al 2008): ( ) & (Brameld 1956, Dawe1970, Habermas 1987, 1988, Thompson 1990): , & , , , / ) , ) / , (Osborne 2000, Hodson 2003, , 2007). & , .. . :) , , (Aikenhead & Solomon1994, Hughes 2000, Pedretti 2005, 2007).) project (Kilpatrick 1918, Frey 1998, 2000).) (.. , , ) (Driver et al, 2000).) (Freire, 1998, Thompson, 1990, Solomon 1993, Roth & Desautels2002, Hodson 2003, 2010)7 & ( ) ( ) ! 104. ;104 . . , ( 3), ( 1). : (.. ) 1: & . :/ : . ; . 2: / : (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coWQ1R2r5MY). 105. ;105 () . & (3) . ( ) . :1 : (, ...).2 : (, , ...).3 : (, ..) , . ( / ) , , . , , . , , (, , ...). , . & . . 106. ;106 , . & . .. . .. , , , , ... 3: & . , , . , . . , , . .. (, , , ..), (.. ), ( , ..), (.. , ) ... .. . .1. Aikenhead, G. & Solomon, J. (1994) STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform, (NewYork: Teachers College Press).2. Aikenhead, G. S. (1994) What is STS teaching? In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.) STS education:International perspectives on reform. (New York: Teachers College Press).3. Alsop, S., Ibrahim, S., & Blimkie, M. (Eds.) (2008) Science and the city: A Field Zine. (Toronto:Ontario)4. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1989) Project 2061: Science for AllAmericans (New York: Oxford University Press) [On line: http://www.project2061.org]5. Brameld, T. (1956) Toward a Reconstructed Philosophy of Education (New York: Dryden Press).6. Bybee R. (1997) Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. In W., Graber, & C., Bolte(Eds.) Scientific literacy (Germany, Kiel: IPN).7. Dawe A. (1970) The Two Sociologies, British Journal of Sociology, 21: 207 218.8. DeBoer, E., G. (1997) Historical Perspectives on Scientific Literacy. In W. Graber, and C. Bolte (Eds.)Scientific literacy (Germany, Kiel: IPN).9. Dewey, J. (1933) How We Think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educativeprocess (Revised ed.) (Boston: D. C.).10. Driver, R. - Newton, P. & Osborn, J. (2000) Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation inClassrooms, Science Education, 84: 287-312.11. European Commission (1993) White Paper on growth, competitiveness, and employment: Thechallenges and ways forward into the 21st century (Brussels, 5 December 1993)12. Fensham, P., J. (2002) Time to change drivers for scientific literacy, Canadian Journal of Science,Mathematics & Technology Education, 2 (1): 9-24.13. Freire, P. (1998) Teachers as Cultural Workers: Letters to Those Who Dare Teach (Boulder: WestviewPress).14. Frey, K. (1998) Project (: ).15. Habermas, J. (1987b) Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2 (Boston: Beacon Press). 107. ;10716. Hodson, D. (1999) Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action,Science Education, 83 (6): 775796.17. Hodson, D. (2003) Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal ofScience Education, 25 (6): pp. 645670.18. Hughes, G. (2000) Marginalization of socio-scientific material in science-technology-society sciencecurricula: some implications for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform, Journal of Research inScience Teaching, 37 (5): pp. 42640.19. Karidas, A. & Koumaras, P. (2001) Scientific and Technological Literacy for All: A Research Modeland a Proposal. In the proceedings of the 1st IOSTE symposium in southern Europe: Science andTechnology Education: Preparing Future Citizens (Cyprus, 2001).20. Kilpatrick, W. (1918) The Project Method, Teachers College Record, 19 (4), p. 319-335.21. Kirkham J. (1989), Balanced Science: Equilibrium between context, process, and, content. In J.Wellington (ed.) Skills and Processes in Science Education: A Critical Analysis. (New York:Roudlege).22. Millar R. (1996) Towards a science curriculum for public understanding, School Science Review, 77(7 - 18).23. Millar, R. & Osborne, J. (Eds.) (1998) Beyond 2000: Science Education for the future. London: KingsCollege London. [http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/beyond-2000-science-education-future]24. OECD/PISA (2003) Learning for Tomorrows World, Programme for International Student Assessment,OECD25. Osborne, J. (2000) Science for Citizenship. n M. Monk & J. Osborne (Eds.) Good Practice in ScienceTeaching: What research has to say (UK: Open University Press).26. Pedretti, E. (2005) STSE education: principles and practices in Aslop S., Bencze L., Pedretti E. (eds.),Analysing Exemplary Science Teaching: theoretical lenses and a spectrum of possibilities for practice(Open University Press, Mc Graw-Hill Education)27. Roth, W., M. & Desautels, J. (eds.) (2002) Science education as/for sociopolitical action (New York:Peter Lang).28. Sjberg, S. (1997) Scientific literacy and school science: Arguments and second thoughts. In E.Kallerud & S. Sjberg (Eds) Science, technology and citizenship: The public understanding of scienceand technology in science education and research policy (Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Studies inResearch and Higher Education).29. Solomon, J. & Aikenhead, G. (1994) STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform, (NewYork: Teachers College Press).30. Solomon, J. (1993) Teaching science, Technology and Society (Buckingham: Open University Press).31. Thompson, E., P. (1990) History Turns on a New Hinge, The Nation, p. 117 - 122.32. Unesco (1994) Project 2000+: Scientific and Technological Literacy for All[http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog/ste/projects/2000/origins1.htm]33. . (2007) , & . ./ [:http://invenio.lib.auth.gr/record/76423/files/gri-2007-617.pdf]34. . (2010) . : - , . 32-33, .80-86.35. , . & , . (2003) & : , & . : - , .6, . 9 21).36. , . & , . (2005) , ( ..). (. 142, . 116 127, 2005).37. , & . (2007) : . , .80, . 10-15.38. , . (2006), (: , ).39. , . (1994). : (: ).40. (2010) (, )[http