Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics - Nanostructure … · Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics David...

Post on 09-Sep-2018

247 views 3 download

Transcript of Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics - Nanostructure … · Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics David...

CircuitQuantum Electrodynamics

David Haviland

Nanosturcture Physics, Dept. Applied Physics, KTH, Albanova

Atom in a CavityConsider only two levels of atom, with energy separation Ω

Atom drifts through electromagnetic resonant cavity with very high Q

Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian:

γ - modescavity -non toratedecay

Strong Coupling limit

γκ ,>>gNeeded:High QLarge d

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Hkapa describes coupling of the cavity to the contimuum (radiation leaking out of the cavity) Hgama descrives coupling to non-cavity modes (spontaious emission where photons escape cavity) Strong coupling is achieved when the atom-cavity coupling term dominates over the decay terms

Electropolished superconducting Nb cavity

http://www.lkb.ens.fr/recherche/qedcav/english/englishframes.htmlNice presentation at:

50 mm diameter and a 40 mm radius of curvature

Energy Eigenstates

Neglect damping for the moment, exact diagonalization gives energy eigenstates:

For zero detuning the degeneracy of the photon states with the atom state is lifted by the coupling. These “dressed states” are “maximally entangled” atom – field states

Blais et. al, Phys. Rev. A, 2004

Presenter
Presentation Notes
General case for aribrary detuning given. Specific case where detuning is zero, that is when the TLS energy level spacing equals the HO energy level spacing, has theta=0. We can call these “dressed” photon sates, or cavity states which have included the TLS. They are “maximally entangled”, which means that Hamiltonian can not separate in to a simple product of TLS states and HO states, but rather “entangled” states given above.

SpectrumC

avity

pho

ton

num

ber

Atom ground

state

Atom excited

state

Vacuum Rabi flopping:

atom in GS1 photon in cavity

1,↑0 photons in cavity

atom in excited state

0,↓

Level splitting depends on number of photons in cavity

12 +ng

Blais et. al, Phys. Rev. A, 2004

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Like Rabi oscillations (harmonic perturbation causes rotation between two levels). But here the coupling is what gives rise to the rotation.

Splitting of Cavity ResonanceNow consider damping: excitation is ½ photon, ½ atom ⇒ decay rate: 2

γκ +

In strong coupling limit there is a splitting of cavity resonance which can be resolved because:

γκε ,rms >>=

dg

Blais et. al, Phys. Rev. A, 2004

Coplanar Waveguide (CPW)really a transmission line

Elec

tros

tatic

Pot

entia

l

Superconducting film

Gap in SC filmTop View

Transverse view on cut

cut

CP box in Microstrip line cavity

Very small effective volume, ~10-5 cubic wavelengths

Blais et. al, Phys. Rev. A, 2004

Cooper Pair Box as TLSC

ircui

t Ene

rgy

-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5External potential Ng = Vg / (2e/Cg)

NCJ Re

TIe

E 24)(

2∆

==π

SQUID junction →tune EJ

I Φext

IC

Φext

“Box”

Map to James-Cummings Hamiltonian

Very large effective dipole moment:

Blais et. al, Phys. Rev. A, 2004

Atom vs. Circuit implementation

Atomic Physics: Measure shift of atom level which drifts through cavity and infer the state of photons in the cavity

Circuit QED: Directly measure transmission of cavity and observe splitting of cavity resonance.

“Atom” replaced by a superconducting circuit with quantized energy.

Circuit does not drift, no transit time.

Circuit two-level-system can be tuned with external voltage and current.

Blais et. al, Phys. Rev. A, 2004

Presenter
Presentation Notes
In atomic physics one does not measure cavity transmission. Rather, one infers the state of the cavity by measuring the shift of atom level which drift through the cavity.

Comparison

•Cooper Pair Box does not drift, stays in place ttransit=∞

•Examine one (and the same) quantum system

•Tune parameters of CPB Hamiltonian with external gate voltage and magnetic flux

Blais et. al, Phys. Rev. A, 2004

Experiment 1 by Yale Group

Nb cavity on Si/SiO2 substrate, length 24 cm,

Wallraff et. al, NATURE, 2004

Schematic of measurement

Wallraff et. al, NATURE, 2004

Mapping tuning conditions

Phase shift of transmitted microwaves at frequency ωr

Density plot of measured phase shift

Wallraff et. al, NATURE, 2004

Vacuum Rabi splitting

Blue – small T, Red – large Tn=0.06n=0.5

By fitting the split cavity resonance, they can determine the mean number of thermal photons in the cavity Wallraff et. al, NATURE, 2004

Atom – Cavity detuning

1 :detuning Large <<∆g

decay rate:

decay rate:

Atom transition is ac Stark/Lamb shifted by ( ) ( )212 +∆ ng

Atom “pulls” cavity resonant frequency: κγ

ωω2g

rr ±⇒Blais et. al, Phys. Rev. A, 2004

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The “excited state manifold” states are shifted

Measuring qubit with caviaty

Phas

e

Probe signal at ωr, measure phase shift

Blais et. al, Phys. Rev. A, 2004

Experiment 2 by Yale Group

•Work in non-resonant regime

•Use pulling of cavity resonance to read out state of TLS (qubit)

•Apply microwave pulse at ωa to prepare qubit state (Rabi oscillations)

Wallraff et. al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2005

Experimental schematic

Wallraff et. al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2005

“meter” response after Rabi pulse

π pulse

2π pulse

3π pulse

Wallraff et. al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2005

Rabi oscillations with unit visibility in readout

Wallraff et. al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2005

Quantum dot in Photonic Crystal Cavity

Yoshie et. al, NATURE 2004

Vacuum Rabi splitting of cavity resonance

Yoshie et. al, NATURE 2004

Bibliography• Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation, Alexandre

Blais, Ren-Shou Huang, Andreas Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Phys Rev. A 69, 062320 (2004)

• Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics, A. Wallraff, D. I. Schuster, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, R.- S. Huang,J. Majer, S. Kumar, S. M. Girvin & R. J. Schoelkopf, NATURE 431, 162 (2004)

• Approaching Unit Visibility for Control of a Superconducting Qubit with Dispersive Readout, A. Wallraff, D. I. Schuster, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, J. Majer, M.H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 060501 (2005)

• Steve Girvins Les Houches Lectures: Prospects for Strong Cavity QuantumElectrodynamics with Superconducting Circuits, S. M. Girvin, Ren-Shou Huang, Alexandre Blais, Andreas Wallraff, and R. J. Schoelkopf ( cond-mat/0310670 v1 28 Oct 2003)

• Theory of Microwave Parametric Down-Conversion and Squeezing Using Circuit QED, K. Moon and S. M. Girvin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 140504 (2005)

• Web site of LABORATOIRE KASTLER BROSSEL with info on Atom-Cavity QED, link to publication list– http://www.lkb.ens.fr/recherche/qedcav/english/englishframes.html

• Colloquium: Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity, J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche, Rev. Mod. Phys. , 73, 565 (2001)

• Vacuum Rabi splitting with asingle quantum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity, T. Yoshie, A. Scherer, J. Hendrickson, G. Khitrova, H. M. Gibbs,G. Rupper2, C. Ell, O. B. Shchekin & D. G. Deppe, NATURE 432, 200 (2004)