Study of Cerebrospinal Fluid Tissue Transglutaminase, T ...ejnpn.org/Articles/177/2006432001.pdf ·...
Click here to load reader
Transcript of Study of Cerebrospinal Fluid Tissue Transglutaminase, T ...ejnpn.org/Articles/177/2006432001.pdf ·...
Azza Ghali et al.
321
Study of Cerebrospinal Fluid Tissue Transglutaminase,
T-TAU, Amyloid Β42
in Alzheimer’s Disease
Azza A Ghali1, Manal El Batch
1, Wafaa Ibrahim
2, Gihan Farouk
3
Departments of Neuropsychiatry1, Medical Biochemistry
2, Clinical Pathology
3, Tanta University
ABSTRACT
Biochemical markers for Alzheimer disease would be of great value, especially to help in early diagnosis of the disease.
The current study has focused on three candidates that have been suggested to be indulged in the pathogenesis of
Alzheimer’ disease (AD): Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) activity, β-amyloid42 (Aβ 42) and total T-tau (T-tau). The study
included 15 patients with probable AD, 15 patients with probable vascular dementia (VaD) in addition to 10 control
subjects without neuropsychiatric diseases. The results of this study revealed that the CSF levels of total T-tau and
activity of tTG, were significantly higher in patients with AD when compared with VaD and control. Also, CSF Aβ42 of
patients with Alzheimer’s disease were significantly low when compared with vascular dementia, and controls. The
sensitivity and specificity of CSF T-tau and Aβ42 were found to be high for differentiation of AD patients from controls,
but their specificity against (VaD) is moderate. So, measurement of CSF tTG, T-tau and Aβ42 level in AD patients may
provide useful and relatively simple biochemical tests for differentiating Alzheimer’s Disease from vascular dementia .In
addition, the diagnostic usefulness of the CSF content of both T-tau and Aβ42 is superior to either measure alone with
high sensitivity and specificity for prediction of AD, and can be recommended as an aid to evaluate individuals
suspected of having dementia. (Egypt J. Neurol. Psychiat. Neurosurg., 2006, 43(2): 321-330)
INTRODUCTION
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most
common form of dementia that affects men and
women equally, and characterized by progressive
deterioration of cognitive functions such as
memory, and language and visuospatial
orientation. Associated symptoms are mood and
behavioral changes. The prognosis is poor with no
cure is available1,2
.
Underlying neuropathological changes in
AD are the accumulation of senile plaques (SPs)
and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). SPs are made
up mainly of β-amyloid, especially the 42-amino-
acid isoform, β-amyloid42 (Aβ42).The major
constituent of NFTs is a cytoskeleton-associated
protein called T-tau, which is
hyperphosphorylated in NFTs3. During the
progression of AD a substantial amount of
neurons degenerate in the brain. The mechanisms
of cell death involved in AD have not been fully
elucidated.
Amyloid β(Aβ) is the major constituent of
the characteristic SPs and cerebrovascular
amyloid found in the brains of AD patients. Aβ42
is proteolytically derived from Aβ42 precursor
protein (APP). APP may normally be involved in
cell adhesion related to synaptic maintenance.
Loss of synapses correlates with dementia,
suggesting that synaptic deficits may underlie
AD4. The major products of this proteolytic
cleavage process contain either 40 or 42 residues
(Aβ40 or Aβ42). Aβ42 is continuously produced in a
soluble form and is found in CSF suggesting that
its production and secretion are part of a
physiological process5. Overproduction of Aβ40-42
or failure to clear this peptide leads to AD,
through amyloid deposition associated with cell
death6.
The microtubule-associated protein, T-tau, is
a normal human brain phosphoprotein, which
Egypt J. Neurol. Psychiat. Neurosurg. Vol. 43 (2) - July 2006
322
binds to microtubules in the neuronal axons,
thereby promoting microtubule assembly and
stability7. Both normal and hyperphosphorylated
T-tau are dispersed to the CSF .T-tau is an in vitro
tTG substrate, being cross-linked and/or
polyaminated, the cross linked filamentous
aggregates of T-tau were insoluble, suggesting
that this may be a contributing step in the process
leading to the formation of NFTs8. The Glutamine
and Lysine residues in T-tau that are modified by
tTG in vitro are located primarily within or
adjacent to the microtubule-binding domains9. If
tTG is involved in T-tau aggregation and NFTs
formation, it can be hypothesized that tTG activity
and/or expression may be elevated in AD8.
Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) (EC 2.3.2.13)
is a multifunctional protein that is likely to play a
role in numerous processes in the nervous system.
tTG post-translationally modifies proteins by trans-
amidation of specific polypeptide bound
glutamines. This action results in the formation of
protein cross links or the incorporation of
polyamines into substrate proteins, modifications
that likely have significant effects on neural
function10,11
. At first the proteasome machinery can
recognize and degrade the cross-linked proteins, but
over time the proteasome machinery may be
overwhelmed and protein aggregates will
accumulate12,13
. It was suggested that the protein
polymers resulting from tTG-catalyzed reactions
may play a role in commitment of cells to undergo
apoptosis14,15
. The most ubiquitously expressed
member of the TGase family, known as tissue
TGase (tTG) or TG2, which catalyzes the
production of epsilon-lysine to gamma-glutaminyl
isodipeptide bonds. It differs from other members
of the TGase gene family in this regard and may
implicate it in 'switches' from life or trophic
signaling to those associated with apoptosis. In this
regard, recent data indicate that one or more
TGases are involved in neurodegenerative disorders
such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases16
. As
do many genes, particularly those highly expressed
in the CNS, tTG undergoes alternative processing.
Elevated expression and alternative splicing,
resulting in a short (S) isoform of tTG with more
active cross-linking activity, are associated with
increased neuronal loss in affected regions in the
demented brain12
. An increase in tTG protein level
is found in postmortem AD brains as well as in
Huntington's disease17
. Many polypeptides
associated with neurodegenerative diseases are
suggested to be putative transglutaminase substrates
such as beta amyloid protein of Alzheimer's
disease, microtubule-associated proteins and
neurofilaments18
.
An analysis of symptoms and signs, blood
studies and brain imaging are major ingredients of
the clinical diagnostic work-up. However, the
diagnosis based on these instruments is
unsatisfactory, indicating the need of highly
sensitive and reliable approaches, selective for
AD and based on biological markers6. Therefore
genetic and/or biochemical markers that support
the clinical diagnosis and can distinguish AD from
cognitive symptoms attributable to ageing and
from other dementias will be of great value. The
identification of such accurate markers for the
early diagnosis of AD is mandatory for the
development of efficient pharmacological
treatment, since therapy should be initiated at an
early stage of the disease, before extensive and
irreversible brain damage has occurred6,19
. As the
intercellular space in the brain is in direct contact
with the CSF, biochemical changes in the brain
may be reflected by CSF analyses that should
reflect the patho-physiological mechanisms of
AD20
. So, the aim of the current study is to assess
CSF changes in tissue transglutaminase activity,
T-tau and Aβ42 in AD and VaD patients. Also, to
determine the sensitivity and specificity of T-tau
and Aβ42 combination as predictors of AD and its
severity.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
This study included 3 groups of matched
age: AD group comprised of 15 patients with the
clinical diagnosis of “probable AD”, 15 patients
with the clinical diagnosis of “probable” vascular
dementia (VaD), and The healthy control group
consisted of 10 subjects. Control subjects were
Azza Ghali et al.
323
undergoing spinal anesthesia for orthopedic
surgery, without histories, symptoms, or signs of
psychiatric or neurological disease, malignant
disease, or systemic disorders (for example,
rheumatoid arthritis, infectious disease). No
subject had cognitive symptoms.
All subjects underwent a comprehensive
clinical evaluation including medical history,
physical, neurological, and psychiatric
examinations. The presence or absence of
dementia was diagnosed according to the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental
Disorders, fourth edition (DSM IV) criteria21
.
Probable AD was diagnosed according to the
National Institute of Neurological and
Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer
disease and Related Disorders (NINCDS-ARDA)
criteria22
. The minimental state examination
(MMSE) was used to judge the severity of the
dementia. Probable Vascular Dementia was
diagnosed by the Hachinski Ischemic Scale
(HIS)23
, and according to National Institute of
Neurological Diseases and Stroke-Association
International pour La Rechache et l Enseigment en
Neuroscience (NINDS-AIREN) criteria24
. Mixture
forms (AD plus) were interpreted as AD
according to Bonelli et al.16
.
Patients with probable AD had insidious
onset and even progressive dementia which could
not explained by systemic or brain disorders other
than A.D. No patients had prominent frontal lobe
symptoms or history, clinical, or brain imaging
signs of cerebrovascular diseases. Patients with
probable AD were classified into mild AD
(MMSE score > 14) and severe AD (MMSE score
< 14). Probable vascular dementia was diagnosed
in patients with history of transitory ischemic
attacks or stroke episodes with temporal relation
to the development of dementia; together with CT
and/or MRI findings of lacunes, infarcts, or white
matter lesions. Other forms of dementia (e.g.,
Huntington, disease, progressive supranuclear
palsy) were excluded in this study.
Routine laboratory tests, EEG, and brain
MRI were done. All subjects underwent lumbar
puncture for diagnostic reasons after they gave
informed consent and undergo CSF analyses.
After centrifugation to eliminate cells and other
insoluble material, all CSF samples were frozen at
-70oC pending biochemical analyses. 1) CSF-T-
tau was determined using a sandwich ELISA
(BioSource, International, Inc.), constructed to
measure total T-tau (both normal T-tau and
phosphorylated -T-tau), as described previously in
accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions25
,
2) CSF Aβ42 was determined using a sandwich
ELISA(Immuno Biological Laboratories) as
described by Mehta et al.26
, 3)CSF tTG activity
was determined according to De Macedo et al.27
,
and CSF protein was determined according to
modified Lowry et al.28
using bovine albumin as a
stander. The enzyme activity was expressed as
anilide umol/min/mg protein.
Statistical analysis: results were expressed
as the mean±SD. Mean of different groups was
compared using a one-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) followed by Student-Newman-Keuls
test. P<0.05 was accepted as significant.
Correlation between variables was evaluated using
Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Cut-off point of
T-tau and Aβ42 was determined according to
Andreasen et al.29,30
.
RESULTS
Analyses of the results:
Table (1) shows the clinical characteristics
of studied groups in which neither the age nor the
duration of dementia significantly differ between
AD, VaD and control, but, the mean MMSE score
showed significant difference between the studied
groups. The mean values of CSF biomarkers in
each group studied have been shown (Table 2).
The highest significant values of CSF T-tau and
tTG activity were observed in the two AD
subgroups as compared with both control and
VaD, while the lowest significant values of Aβ42
were found in severe AD as compared with both
control and VaD. No significant correlation was
found in the AD group, between CSF changes in
tTG activity, T-tau protein, Aβ42 and either age,
severity or duration of the disease (Table 2). An
Egypt J. Neurol. Psychiat. Neurosurg. Vol. 43 (2) - July 2006
324
inverse correlation was found between CSF
concentrations of T-tau and Aβ42 within the AD
group. No significant correlation was found
between tTG activity and both T-tau and Aβ42.
Using a cut-off point of T-tau =306(pg/ml) and
Aβ42=500(pg/ml), the sensitivity and specificity of
CSF-T-tau and Aβ42 was calculated as diagnostic
markers for AD. The sensitivity was defined as
the ability of CSF-T-tau and Aβ42 to identify AD.
The specificity was defined as the ability of CSF-
T-tau and Aβ42 to exclude AD, whereas the
positive predictive value was defined as the
proportion of correctly diagnosed patients with
AD of all patients with high CSF-T-tau and low
Aβ42 (Altman et al., 1983). 9/10 (90%) of the
controls had normal levels of both CSF-T-tau and
CSF-Aβ42, while one control (10%) had
abnormal values. In contrast, AD patients both
mild and severe, 14/15(93.33%) had high CSF-T-
tau and low CSF- Aβ42, while 1/15(6.66%) had
normal levels of both markers. As regards
probable VaD 9/15(60%) had high CSF-T-tau and
low CSF-Aβ42, while 6/15(40%) had normal
levels of both markers (Table 4). Thus, the
sensitivity for high CSF-T-tau and/or low CSF-
Aβ42, for the prediction of AD was (93.33%),
while the specificity was (90%) when compared
with the control and 40% when compared with
VaD.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the studied groups.
Variables Control
(n=10)
Alzheimer’s disease (n=15) probable
vascular
dementia
(n=15)
F p Mild AD
(n=6)
Severe AD
(n=9)
Age(years) 67±4 65±7 71±4 66 ±8 1.45 0.222
Sex (♂/♀) 5/5 2/4 4/5 6/9
Duration of
dementia (months) - 38 ±27 40±28 38 ±21 0.48 P=0.621
MMSE 29.3±5 22.6 ±4.5 10±1.8 15 ±5.8 30.63 <0.001*
All groups are significantly differ
Table 2. CSF levels of T-tau, Aβ42, tTG activity among the studied groups.
Variables Control
(n=10)
Alzheimer’s disease (n=15) probable
vascular
dementia
(n=15)
F p Mild AD
(n=6)
Severe AD
(n=9)
T-tau (pg/ml) 225±88 300±90 700±270 280±130 17.29 <0.001*
All groups are significantly differ except mild vs. control, VaD vs. control and mild
vs. VaD
A β42(pg/ml) 875±262 400±100 255±87 550±206 17.08 <0.001*
All groups are significantly differ except mild vs. severe and mild vs. VaD
tTG activity (anilide
mol/min/mg protein)
0.41±0.03 0.75±0.09 0.89±0.07 0.51±0.09 81.87 <0.001*
All groups are significantly differ
Azza Ghali et al.
325
Table 3. Correlation between T-tau, Aβ42, tTG activity and other variables in Alzheimer's disease groups
(n=15).
Variables T-T-tau A β42 tTG activity
Age (years) 0.20 -0.18 0.12
Duration of dementia (month) 0.23 0.14 0.30
MMSE 0.28 0.22 0.07
T-T-tau (pg/ml) - -0.39* 0.33
A β42(pg/ml) -0.39* - -0.32
tTG activity (anilide mol/min/mg protein) 0.33 -0.32 -
Table 4. Sensitivity and specificity of the combined CSF T-tau and Aβ42 in Alzheimer’s disease.
Variables Cut-off Value Sensitivity
%
Specificity
%
Accuracy PPV
Probable Alzheimer’s
disease (n=15)
T-tau=306 (pg/ml)
Aβ42=500(pg/ml)
93.33% 90% (AD vs. C)
40% (AD vs. VaD)
92% 93.33%
Aβ42 = amyloid beta, AD= Alzheimer’s disease, VaD= vascular dementia, C = healthy control, PPV= positive
predictive value
DISCUSSION
The antemortem diagnosis of AD requires
time-consuming and costly procedures. Also, the
accuracy of the clinical diagnosis at the general
hospitals is probably even lower, especially in the
early stages of the disease when the symptoms are
indistinct. Therefore, biochemical tests that can
direct the physician rapidly to the correct
diagnosis should be able to detect a fundamental
feature of neuropathology. Furthermore, its
sensitivity for detection of AD as well as its
specificity for discrimination of AD from other
dementia disorders should exceed 80%. A marker
for AD should also be reliable, reproducible,
noninvasive, simple to perform in clinical routine
and inexpensive2. Measurement of single
biochemical markers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
shows robust alterations that highly correlate with
the clinical diagnosis of AD but generally lack
sufficient diagnostic accuracy31
. So, in the present
study combined CSF measurements of T-tau (as a
marker for neuronal degeneration), Aβ42 (as a
marker for amyloid beta metabolism, and possibly
for the formation of senile plaques) and tTG (as a
marker for apoptosis) in 30 patients who under-
went diagnostic workup for dementia and in 10
healthy control subjects was done.
In the current study, there was a significant
increase in CSF activity of tTG in dementia groups
as compared with the control, with a significant
change on comparing probable AD with probable
VaD. This findings came in accordance with the
results Lesort et al., 11
who found that tTG level and
activity are elevated in both Alzheimer's and
Huntington's disease in post mortem. Jhonson and
coworkers 8
found that the levels of tTG, as
determined by quantitative immunoblotting, were
elevated approximately 3-folds in Alzheimer
disease prefrontal cortex, compared to control and
there were not significant differences in tTG levels
in the cerebellum between control and Alzheimer
disease cases. This elevated level of tTG may be
related to neurofibrillary pathology which is usually
abundant in the prefrontal cortex and not in the
cerebellum which is usually spared in Alzheimer
Egypt J. Neurol. Psychiat. Neurosurg. Vol. 43 (2) - July 2006
326
disease. They suggested that tTG could be a
contributing factor in neurofibrillary tangle
formation because tTG is calcium-activated, and
tau is an excellent substrate of this enzyme in vitro.
The increased intracellular calcium levels in AD
activate tTG which converts tau to neurofibrillary
tangles32,33
. Furthermore, Bonelli et al.,16
proposed
that the concentration of CSF tTG in relation CSF
tau and AB42 is an indicator for acute cell death in
vivo. The CSF tTG levels appears to be elevated in
AD patients due to the increased apoptotic process;
the protein seems to be released into the
extracellular space after cell disruption. Therefore,
inhibition of transglutaminase-induced cross-linking
may provide a novel strategy for treatment of AD.
The In the current study, the missing association
between CSF activity of tTG and MMSE shows
that tTG may not serve as an indicator for mental
decline.
It has been suggested that CSF T-tau
concentrations are a good reflection of the actual
degree of neurofibrillary degeneration in the brain,
and implying that CSF T-tau concentrations may
increase with increasing neurofibrillary tangles
(NFTs) load and thus with disease progression34
.
The data presented here in confirmed previous
findings of Andreasen et al., 35
; Galasko et al.36
, and
Rösler et al.37
, of a pronounced increase in CSF-T-
tau in Alzheimer’s disease and suggested that the
CSF T-tau levels reflect the degree of neuronal
(especially axonal) degeneration and damage 38
, as
evidenced by a transient increase in CSF T-tau after
acute stroke39
. This increase probably reflects
leakage of T-tau from damaged neurons to the
CSF29
. An increased level of CSF T-tau is indeed
not a specific marker for AD, but appears also in
other neurological diseases, such acute cerebral
stroke, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, frontotemporal
dementia, dementia with Lewy’s bodies or
Parkinson’s disease. However, CSF T-tau is
generally lower in these pathologies than in AD20
.
Also, Mulder et al.6, and Parnetti et al.
40, found
increase of CSF T-tau in AD in the earlier stages of
dementia, which makes this measurement useful for
early diagnosis of AD. In the present study there
was no correlation between CSF-T-tau and duration
of dementia which came in accordance with Isoe et
al.41
. These findings suggested that high CSF-T-tau
concentrations are present during the whole course
of the disease. It is possible that the same high CSF-
T-tau concentrations are also found before the onset
of clinical dementia. If so, CSF-T-tau may be useful
for selection of patients with early memory dis-
turbances for clinical drug trials29
.
Concomitantly it has been found that CSF-T-
tau has a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of AD29
.
In total, 41/43 (95%) patients with AD had a CSF-
T-tau concentration above the cut off level of 306
pg/ml in healthy controls. However, the specificity
was lower, as almost all (86%) patients with VaD
also had high CSF-T-tau concentrations. In the
current study, high CSF-T-tau concentrations were
also found in patients with VaD, resulting in a low
diagnostic specificity of CSF-T-tau for AD. The
high CSF-T-tau concentrations found in VaD may
in part be explained by the fact that, these patients
may, in addition to cerebro-vascular pathology,
have concomitant AD pathology, which is impos-
sible to be excluded clinically. Indeed, several
neuropathological studies found that a high
proportion (40–80%) of clinically diagnosed
patients with VaD have notable concomitant AD
pathology42,43
.
The central protein in SPs is Aβ42. It is
produced and secreted from human cells as a result
of normal cellular processing of the larger tran-
membrane protein APP44
. It is possible that Aβ42
accumulation triggers the hyperphosphorylation of
T-tau protein which precedes the assembly of these
molecules into filaments6. Previous studies came in
accordance with the results of the current study that
demonstrated a moderate to marked decrease in
CSF Aβ42 in AD with no significant correlation
with age, MMSE or duration of AD symptoms26,45
.
The possible cause of low CSF- Aβ42 levels, may
be, axonal degeneration and entrapment in narrow
interstitial and subarachnoid drainage pathways46,47
.
The lack of a clear relationship among CSF Aβ42
level, severity of dementia, and duration of
disease in this study is consistent with studies
showing that plaque accumulation and brain
amyloid burden do not correspond to duration and
Azza Ghali et al.
327
severity of AD48
. In contrast, Csernansky et al.49
,
found that increased severity of dementia was
correlated with increased CSF T-tau
concentrations and decreased Aβ42 concentrations.
The mean sensitivity of CSF Aβ42 for
discrimination between AD and normal aging is
approximately 86%, while the specificity is
approximately 91%. On the other-hand, the
specificity for discrimination of AD from other
disorders is moderate. Low levels of Aβ42 in CSF
have been found in other neurodegenerative
disorders50,47
. Therefore, in the present study
concomitant measurements of CSF T-tau and Aβ42
was performed which have been suggested to
increase the diagnostic precision of AD. These
biochemical markers seem to have clinical value
in the very early phase of probable AD and
patients with low CSF Aβ and high CSF T-tau
have a strong likelihood of having AD.
Conversely, patients who exhibit low T-tau and
elevated Aβ42 are free of AD51
. Andreasen and
his colleges35
found that, the sensitivity for the
diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment by using
the combination of T-tau and Aβ42 was 75%.
These results confirm the findings of aberrant CSF
T-tau and Aβ42 concentrations early in the course
of the disease, independent of disease progression.
Also, it has been deduced that the CSF markers
(T-tau and Aβ42) should be combined with the
clinical information and brain-imaging
techniques44
. Finally, the current study concluded
that, the sensitivity and specificity increased if
CSF-T-tau and CSF- Aβ42 were used together.
The level of CSF-T-tau has been suggested to
reflect the neuronal and axonal degeneration in
AD and/or the formation of neurofibrillary
tangles, while the level of CSF- Aβ42 has been
suggested to reflect the deposition of β-amyloid in
senile plaques, with lower levels excreted to the
CSF. Thus, both these analyses probably reflect
central pathogenic processes in the AD brain,
which, however, may vary in intensity between
patients. Therefore, it seems logical that the
combined use of these markers will increase the
sensitivity, specificity and adds to the accuracy of
an AD diagnosis19
.
Conclusion: the present results suggested
that tTG may be a powerful biochemical marker
of the degenerating process in vivo. It may serve
as completion of CSF analysis in the diagnosis of
dementing disorders and may be a simple way of
assessing the efficacy of possible new
antiapoptotic drugs. In addition, the diagnostic
usefulness of the CSF content of both T-tau and
Aβ42 is superior to either measure alone with high
sensitivity and specificity for prediction of AD,
and can be recommended as an aid to evaluating
individuals suspected of having dementia.
REEFRENCES
1. Ankarcrona M, Winblad B. (2005): Biomarkers
for apoptosis in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Geriatr
Psychiatry 20(2):101-5.
2. Sjogren M, Andreasen N, Blennow K. (2003):
Advances in the detection of Alzheimer's disease-
use of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. Clin Chim
Acta. 332(1-2):1-10.
3. Cummings JL. (2004). Alzheimer's disease. N
Engl J Med;1;351(1):56-67.
4. Ho GJ, Gregory EJ, Smirnova IV, Zoubine MN,
Festoff BW. (1994): Cross-linking of beta-
amyloid protein precursor catalyzed by tissue
transglutaminase. FEBS Lett; 349(1):151-4.
5. Verbeek MM, de Jong D, Kremer HPH. (2003):
Brain-specific proteins in cerebrospinal fluid for
the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. Ann.
Clin. Biochem; 40:25-40.
6. Mulder C, Scheltens P, Visser JJ, Van Kamp GJ
and Schutgens RBH. (2000): Genetic and
biochemical markers for Alzheimer's disease:
recent developments. Ann. Clin. Biochem., 37:
593-607.
7. Guillozet-Bongaarts AL, Garcia-Sierra F,
Reynolds MR, Horowitz PM, Fu Y, Wang T,
Cahill ME, Bigio EH, Berry RW, Binder LI.
(2005): T-tau truncation during neurofibrillary
tangle evolution in Alzheimer's disease.
Neurobiol Aging. 26(7): 1015-22.
8. Johnson GV, Cox TM, Lockhart JP, Zinnerman
MD, Miller ML, Powers RE. (1997):
Transglutaminase activity is increased in
Alzheimer's disease brain. Brain Res.; 751(2):
323-9.
Egypt J. Neurol. Psychiat. Neurosurg. Vol. 43 (2) - July 2006
328
9. Tucholski J, Kuret J, Johnson GV. (1999): T-tau
is modified by tissue transglutaminase in situ:
possible functional and metabolic effects of
polyamination. J Neurochem.; 73(5): 1871-80.
10. Lesort M, Chun W, Tucholski J, Johnson GV.
(2002): Does tissue transglutaminase play a role
in Huntington's disease? Neurochem Int; 40(1):
37-52.
11. Lesort M, Tucholski J, Miller ML, Johnson GV.
(2000): Tissue transglutaminase: a possible role
in neurodegenerative diseases. Prog Neurobiol.;
61(5): 439-63.
12. Citron BA, Suo Z, SantaCruz K, Davies PJ, Qin
F, Festoff BW.(2002): Protein crosslinking, tissue
transglutaminase, alternative splicing and
neurodegeneration. Neurochem Int.; 40(1): 69-
78.
13. Cooper AJ, Jeitner TM, Gentile V, Blass JP.
(2002): Cross linking of polyglutamine domains
catalyzed by tissue transglutaminase is greatly
favored with pathological-length repeats: does
transglutaminase activity play a role in
(CAG)(n)/Q(n)-expansion diseases?. Neurochem
Int.; 40(1): 53-67.
14. Autuori F, Farrace MG, Oliverio S, Piredda L.
(1998): Piacentini M"Tissue" transglutaminase
and apoptosis. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 62:
129-36.
15. Chen JS, Mehta K (1999):Tissue
transglutaminase: an enzyme with a split
personality Int J Biochem Cell Biol;31(8):817-3.
16. Bonelli RM, Aschoff A, Niederwieser G,
Heuberger C, Jirikowski G. ( 2002 ):
Cerebrospinal fluid tissue transglutaminase as a
biochemical marker for Alzheimer's disease.
Neurobiol Dis.; 11(1):106-10.
17. Kim SY, Grant P, Lee JH, Pant HC, Steinert PM.
(1999): Differential expression of multiple
transglutaminases in human brain. Increased
expression and cross-linking by
transglutaminases 1 and 2 in Alzheimer's disease.
J Biol Chem; 22;274(43): 30715-21.
18. Kwak SJ, Kim SY, Kim YS, Song KY, Kim IG,
Park SC. (1998): Isolation and characterization of
brain-specific transglutaminases from rat. Exp
Mol Med; 31;30(4): 177-85.
19. Maccioni RB, Lavados M, Maccioni CB,
Mendoza-Naranjo A. (2004): Biological markers
of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive
impairment. Curr Alzheimer Res; 1(4):307-14.
20. Leszek J, Malyszczak K, Janicka B, Kiejna A,
Wiak A. (2003): Total T-tau in cerebrospinal
fluid differentiates Alzheimer's disease from
vascular dementia. Med Sci Monit.; 9(11):
CR484-8.
21. American Psychiatric Association (AMP) (1994):
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders, 4 th edition DSM VI, Washinton D.C.
22. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman
R, Price D. and Stadlan EM. (1984): Clinical
diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Report of the
NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the
auspices of Department of Health and Human
Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease.
Neurology 34, 939–944.
23. Hachinski VC, Hiff LD, Zilhka E, Du Boulay
GH, McAllister VL, Marshall J., et al. (1975):
Cerebral blood flow in dementia. Arch. Neurol;
32: 632–637.
24. Roman GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T,
Cummings JL, Masdeu JC. and Garcia JH.
(1993): Vascular dementia: Diagnostic criteria for
research studies. Report of the NINDSAIREN
International Workshop. Neurology 43, 250–260.
25. Vandermeeren M, Mercken M, Vanmechelen E.
(1993): Detection of proteins in normal and
Alzheimer’s disease cerebrospinal fluid with a
sensitive sandwich enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay. J Neurochem; 61: 1828–
34.
26. Mehta PD, Pirttila T, Mehta SP, Sersen EA,
Aisen PS, Wisniewski HM. (2000): Plasma and
cerebrospinal fluid levels of amyloid beta
proteins1–40 and 1–42 in Alzheimer disease.
Arch Neurol; 57:100–5.
27. De Macedo P, Marrano C. and Keillor J.
(2000) :A direct continuous spectrophotometric
assay for transglutaminase activity. Anal.
Biochem; 285, 16-20.
28. Lowry O, Rosebrough N, Farr A. and Randall R.
(1951): Protein measurement with the folin
phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem., 193: 265-275.
29. Andreasen N, Minthon L, Vanmechelen E.
(1999): Cerebrospinal fluid T-tau and Aβ42 as
predictors of development of Alzheimer’s disease
in patients with mild cognitive impairment.
Neurosci Lett; 273: 5-8.
30. Andreasen N, Vanmechelen E, Van de Voorde E,
Davidsson P, Hesse C, Tarvonen S, RaÈ ihaÈ I.,
Sourander L, Winblad B. and Blennow K.
(1998): Cerebrospinal fluid T-tau protein as a
biochemical marker for Alzheimer's disease: a
community based follow up study. J. Neurol.
Neurosurg. Psychiatry 64 298-305.
Azza Ghali et al.
329
31. Maddalena A, Papassotiropoulos A, Muller-
Tillmanns B, Jung HH, Hegi T, Nitsch RM, Hock
C. (2003):Biochemical diagnosis of Alzheimer
disease by measuring the cerebrospinal fluid ratio
of phosphorylated T-tau protein to beta-amyloid
peptide42. Arch Neurol. ; 60(9):1202-6.
32. Norlund MA, Lee JM, Zainelli GM, Muma NA.
(1999): Elevated transglutaminase-induced bonds
in PHF T-tau in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res
;851(1-2):154-63.
33. Case A, Stein RL. (2003): Kinetic analysis of the
action of tissue transglutaminase on peptide and
protein substrates. Biochemistry.42(31): 9466-81.
34. Tapiola T, Overmyer M, Lehtovirta M, Ramberg
J. (1997): The level of cerebrospinal fluid T-tau
correlates with neurofibrillary tangles in
Alzheimer's disease. Neuroreport; 8:3961-3.
35. Andreasen N, Minthon L, Davidsson P,
Vanmechelen E. (2001): Evaluation 0f CSF T-tau
and CSF A beta 42 as diagnostic markers for
Alzheimer's disease in clinical practice. Arch.
Neurol; 58:373-9
36. Galasko D, Clark C, Chang L. (1997):
Assessment of CSF levels of T-tau protein in
mildly demented patients with Alzheimer’s
disease. Neurology 48:632–5.
37. Rösler N, Wichart I, Jellinger KA. (1996): Total T-
tau protein immunoreactivity in lumbar
cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer’s
disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 60: 237–8.
38. Blennow K, Wallin A, Agren H, Spenger C,
Siegfried J, Van-mechelen E. (1995): T-tau
protein in cerebrospinal fluid: a biochemical
marker for axonal degeneration in Alzheimer
disease? Mol Chem Neuropathol; 26:231–45.
39. Hesse C, Rosengren L, Vanmechelen E. (2000):
Cerebrospinal fluid markers for Alzheimer’s
disease evaluated after acute ischemic stroke. J
Alzheimer’sDis; 2 :199–206.
40. Parnetti L, Lanari A, Saggese E, Spaccatini C,
Gallai V. (2003): Cerebrospinal fluid biochemical
markers in early detection and in differential
diagnosis of dementia disorders in routine clinical
practice. Neurol Sci.; 24(3):199-200.
41. Isoe K, Urakami K, Shimomura T, Wakutani Y,
Ji Y, Adachi Y, Takahashi K. (1996): T-tau
proteins in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with
Alzhei-mer’s disease: a longitudinal study
[Letter]. Dementia 7:175– 6.
42. Jellinger KA. (1996): Diagnostic accuracy of
Alzheimer’s disease: a clinicopathological study.
Acta Neuropathol; 91:219–20.
43. Kosunen O, Soininen H, Paljärvi L. (1996):
Diagnostic accuracy of Alzheimer’s disease: a
neuropathological study. Acta Neuropathol;
91:185–93
44. Andreasen N, Sjogren M, Blennow K. (2003):
CSF markers for Alzheimer's disease: total T-tau,
phospho-T-tau and Abeta42. World J Biol
Psychiatry. 4(4):147-55.
45. Tamaoka A, Sawamura N, Fukushima T. (1997):
Amyloid beta protein 42(43)in cerebrospinal fluid
of patients with Alzheim-er’s disease.J Neurol
Sci;148:41–5.
46. Ichihara N, Wu J, Chui DH, Yamazaki K,
Wakabayashi T, Kikuchi T. (1995): Axonal
degeneration promotes abnormal accumulation of
amyloid beta-protein in ascending gracile tract of
gracile axonal dystrophy(GAD)mouse. Brain
Res;695:173–8
47. Sjogren M, Minthon L, Davidsson P. (2000):
CSF levels of T-tau, beta-amyloid(1–42)andGAP-
43 in fronto temporal dementia, other types of
dementia and normal aging. J Neural Transm;
107:563–79.
48. Southwick PC, Susan KY, Charles LE. (1996):
Assessment of Amyloid β protein in
cerebrospinal fluid as anaid in the diagnosis of
Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem;66:259-65
49. Csernansky JG, Miller JP, McKeel D, Morris JC.
( 2002): Relationships among cerebrospinal fluid
biomarkers in dementia of the Alzheimer type.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. ; 16(3):144-9.
50. Kanemaru K, Kameda N, Yamanouchi H. (2000):
Decreased CSF amyloid beta 42 and normal T-tau
levels in dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology
54:1875–6.
51. Kanai M, Matsubara E, Isoe K, Arai H. (1998):
Longitudinal study of cerebrospinal fluid levels
of T-tau , A beta 1-40, and A beta 1-42 in
Alzheimer's disease: a study in Japan. Ann.
Neurol; 44:17-26.
ــص العربـــىخالمل
Egypt J. Neurol. Psychiat. Neurosurg. Vol. 43 (2) - July 2006
330
إنسيم الترانس جلوتاميناز النسيجي وبروتين التاو و البيتا اميلويذ دارسة نشاط
فى مرض عته السهايمر فى السائل المخى الشوكى
151515
.