Paper 4 Writing in Greek -...
Transcript of Paper 4 Writing in Greek -...
Paper 4
Writing in Greek
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Επισκόπηση Εξεταστικού ΔοκιμίουPaper Title Length of
Assessment
Paper 4
25%
60 marks
WRITING F = 1 h 15 mins
H = 1 h 25 mins
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Foundation Tier: 4 Questions
Students will be assessed through 4 tasks:
1) one open-response question of 20-30 words
2) one open-response question of 40-50 words
3) one open-response question of 80-90 words
(cross over task)
4) one translation question from English into
Greek (sentences)
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Τί να προσέξουμε;
a) Students must answer ALL 4 QUESTIONS and must ΝΟΤ use a dictionary.
b) The number of words is approximate and students will not be penalised for
writing more or fewer words than recommended in the word count. All work
produced by the student must be marked.
c) Questions 3 & 4: Students are not expected to produce perfect, error-free
writing in order to access the top band as errors are also made by native
speakers.
d) Assessment Criteria and Marking Guidance can be found in the Specification and
the Sample Assessment Materials document:
https://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/GCSE/Greek/2017/speci
fication-and-sample-assessments/specification-GCSE-L1-L2-in-greek-2017.pdf
https://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/GCSE/Greek/2017/speci
fication-and-sample-assessments/SAMs_GCSE_L1-
L2_in_Greek_August_2016_Draft.pdfΓιάννης Λάμπρου
QUESTION 1 (12 marks)
assesses students on
their ability to write to
describe and to express
opinions (20-30 words):
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Question 1 (12 marks): Assessment Criteria
1. Communication and Content: 6 marks
Relevant information with occasional extra detail
Uses language to give short descriptions, simple information and opinions
with some success
Uses small selection of common, familiar vocabulary and expression with
little repetition
2. Linguistic Knowledge and Accuracy: 6 marks
Produces simple sentences with some linking
Accurate application of a small selection of straightforward grammatical
structures, refers successfully to present events as appropriate to the
task; occasionally errors occur that hinder clarity of communication
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
QUESTION 2 (16 marks) assesses students on their ability to note
down key points and convey information. They must use the formal
register (40-50 words):
Formal Register
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Question 2 (16 marks): Assessment Criteria1. Communication and Content: 8 marks
Relevant information given appropriate to the task, basic points made with some
development
Uses language mostly with success, to present simple facts, information and to note down
key points using simple ideas
Uses independently selected, common, familiar vocabulary and expression with little
repetition; goes beyond the language of the stimulus material
Appropriate use of register and style sustained
2. Linguistic Knowledge and Accuracy: 8 marks
Uses straightforward grammatical structures, occasional repetition
Produces predominantly simple sentences occasionally linked together
Mostly accurate use of straightforward grammatical structures, mostly successful references
to present and future events to meet the requirements of the task; occasionally errors hinder
clarity of communicationΓιάννης Λάμπρου
QUESTION 3 (20 marks) has TWO OPTIONS from which students have to
select one. This question assesses students on their ability to convey
information, narrate, express opinions, interest, and convince the reader
about a certain point. Students must use the informal register. This question
is common to the Higher tier (80-90 words):
Informal
Register
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Informal
Register
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Question 3 (20 marks): Assessment Criteria1. Communication and Content: 12 marks
Communicates information relevant to the task with expansion of key points and ideas
Effective adaptation of language to narrate, inform, interest and give convincing personal
opinions
Frequent examples of creative language use to express individual thoughts and ideas; a
variety of vocabulary and expression, some examples of uncommon language
Appropriate use of register and style throughout with minimal inconsistency
2. Linguistic Knowledge and Accuracy: 8 marks
Some variation of grammatical structures, occasional complex structure
Produces frequently extended sentences, well linked together
Generally accurate language and structures, including successful references to past,
present and future events; occasionally errors occur that hinder clarity of communication
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
QUESTION 4 (12 marks) isthe translation question.
(α) Students are required
to translate FIVE sentences
from English to Greek.
(β) The sentences are
ordered by increasing level
of difficulty.
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Question 4 (12 marks): Assessment Criteria
1. Sentences (a), (b) and (c) are worth 2 marks each:
Meaning fully communicated with occasional errors
that do not hinder clarity
2. Sentences (d) and (e) are worth 3 marks each:
The meaning of the sentence is fully communicated
Linguistic structures and vocabulary are accurate
with only occasional errors that do not hinder
clarityΓιάννης Λάμπρου
HIGHER TIER: 3 Questions
Students will be assessed through 3 tasks:
1) one open-response question of 80-90 words
(cross over task)
2) one open-response question of 130-150
words
3) one translation question from English into
Greek (paragraph)
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Τί να προσέξουμε;
a) Students must answer ALL 3 QUESTIONS and must NOT use a dictionary.
b) The number of words is approximate and students will not be penalisedfor writing more or fewer words than recommended in the word count.All work produced by the student must be marked.
c) Students are not expected to produce perfect, error-free writing in orderto access the top band as errors are also made by native speakers.
d) Assessment Criteria and Marking Guidance can be found in theSpecification and the Sample Assessment Materials document:
https://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/GCSE/Greek/2017/specification-and-sample-assessments/specification-GCSE-L1-L2-in-greek-2017.pdf
https://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/GCSE/Greek/2017/specification-and-sample-assessments/SAMs_GCSE_L1-L2_in_Greek_August_2016_Draft.pdf
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
QUESTION 1 (20 marks) has TWO OPTIONS from which students have to
select one. This question assesses students on their ability to convey
information, narrate, express opinions, interest, and convince the reader
about a certain point. Students must use the informal register. This question
is common to the Higher tier (80-90 words):
Informal
Register
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Informal
Register
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Question 1 (20 marks): Assessment Criteria1. Communication and Content: 12 marks
Communicates information relevant to the task with expansion of key points and ideas
Effective adaptation of language to narrate, inform, interest and give convincing personal
opinions
Frequent examples of creative language use to express individual thoughts and ideas; a
variety of vocabulary and expression, some examples of uncommon language
Appropriate use of register and style throughout with minimal inconsistency
2. Linguistic Knowledge and Accuracy: 8 marks
Some variation of grammatical structures, occasional complex structure
Produces frequently extended sentences, well linked together
Generally accurate language and structures, including successful references to past,
present and future events; occasionally errors occur that hinder clarity of communication
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
QUESTION 2 (28 marks) has TWO OPTIONS from which students have to select
one. This question assesses students on their ability to convey information,
narrate, express AND JUSTIFY ideas and opinions, and interest or convince the
reader. Students must use the FORMAL REGISTER. This question is common to the
Foundation tier (130-150 words):
Formal
Register
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Formal
Register
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Question 2 (28 marks): Assessment Criteria1. Communication and Content: 16 marks
Communicates detailed information relevant to the task, with consistently effective
development of key points and ideas
Consistently effective adaptation of language to narrate, inform, interest/convince
Creative use of language to express and fully justify a wide range of individual
thoughts, ideas and points of view; wide variety of vocabulary and expression, many
examples of uncommon language
Consistent use of appropriate register and style throughout
2. Linguistic Knowledge and Accuracy: 12 marks
Uses a wide variety of grammatical structures, including complex language
Fluent response throughout with extended, well-linked sentences
Consistently accurate language and structures, consistently successful references to
past, present and future events; any errors do not hinder the clarity of the
communicationΓιάννης Λάμπρου
QUESTION 3 (12 marks) is the translation question.
- Students are required to translate a short paragraph from English into
Greek.
- The individual sentences are ordered by increasing level of difficulty.Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Question 3 (12 marks): Assessment Criteria
The translation mark grid assesses both
communication and content and linguistic
knowledge and accuracy. When awarding marks,
the student’s response across the whole paragraph
should be considered.
Full marks should be awarded if:
1. the meaning of the passage is fully
communicated
2. language and structures are consistently
accurate; any errors do not hinder clarity
Communication/Content
6 marks
Linguistic Knowledge/Accuracy
6 marks
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Εφαρμογή Κριτηρίων Αξιολόγησης – Higher, Question 3 (12 marks):
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Errors that do not hinder clarity:
1. errors that do not affect meaning, for example
gender, adjectival agreements (as long as they do
not affect case)
e.g., μου αρέσει το δουλειά μου
μου αρέσει την δουλειά μου
2. infrequent errors that do not distract the reader
from the content and which result in coherent
writing
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Errors that hinder clarity:
1. Errors that make writing difficult to understand immediately
(even if the meaning is eventually understood)/errors which
force readers to re-read in order to understand what is meant,
for example inaccurate tense formation and inaccurate
application of the conventions of case:
e.g., δουλέψουμε σκληρά για τις εξετάσεις που κάνουμε
2. frequent errors hinder clarity as they will distract the reader
from the content of the writingΓιάννης Λάμπρου
Errors that prevent meaning being conveyed:
1. errors that mean the reader cannot understand the
message
2. errors that convey the wrong message
3. errors that make it unclear who is doing the action, for
example using the incorrect person of the verb
4. mother-tongue interference
e.g., τους κάτοικους της Αγγλίας συμφέρονται ότι το
κάπνισμα πρέπει να γίνει έξω
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Εφαρμογή Κριτηρίων Αξιολόγησης – Higher, Question 3 (12 marks):English ‘u’, stress
mother-tongue interference
Case Xaspect
gender
Communication/Content: 5/6 meaning mostly communicated (not always: όταν τελειώνω … θα πηγαίνω),
occasional words are omitted (εκεί κοντά/για την μητέρα της)/incorrectly communicated (Ελληνικά
οικογέννεα)
Linguistic Knowledge/Accuracy: 4/6 mostly accurate language and structures; errors occasionally hinder
clarity (μου αρέσει την δουλειά μου, όταν τελειώνω … θα πηγαίνω)/prevent meaning from being conveyed
(ελληνική δουλειά).
9/12
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Εφαρμογή Κριτηρίων Αξιολόγησης – Higher, Question 2α (28 marks)
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
Γιάννης Λάμπρου
inf. register
poor phrasingcase X
case Xrepetition
gendergender
case Xinf. register
inf. register
Communication/Content: 13/161.coverage of all bullet points
2.effective use of language to interest/convince
BUT
1.no originality: ideas and points of view do not go
beyond the standard response:
e.g., school project
1.there could be more variety of vocabulary and
expression: e.g., οι ντόπιοι/κάτοικοι είναι όχι μόνο
βοηθητικοί αλλά και ευγενικοί, θα γνωρίσουμε την
κουλτούρα και τον πολιτισμό της Κύπρου
2.the use of the formal register is not consistent
throughout: e.g., να [σε] πείσω να οργανώσεις
Linguistic Knowledge / Accuracy: 9/121.variety of grammatical structures, but language
could be more complex: e.g., σας γράφω
προκειμένου να σας ζητήσω να, θα μπορούσαμε να
επισκεφτούμε, αν και/παρόλο που γνωρίζω ότι
2.fluent response, but sentences could be more well
linked: εκτός από αυτό, επιπλέον, βέβαια
3.language and structures are consistently accurate,
but there is some inaccurate application of the
conventions of case: e.g., για όλοι οι μαθητές22/28Γιάννης Λάμπρου