Jacco Snoeijer Physics of Fluids - University of Twente · 2019-09-17 · Jacco Snoeijer Physics of...
Transcript of Jacco Snoeijer Physics of Fluids - University of Twente · 2019-09-17 · Jacco Snoeijer Physics of...
Jacco Snoeijer
Physics of Fluids - University of Twente
contact line dynamics
flow near contact linesliding drops
static contact line
molecular scales macroscopic
γsv
γ
γ cos θe = γsv - γslYoung’s law (1805):
θe γsl
Ingbrigtsen & Toxvaerd (2007)
static vs dynamic
receding
advancing
moving contact lines
static vs dynamic
receding
advancing
moving contact lines
hydrodynamic forces down to molecular scales !!
‘multi-scale problem’
outline
part 1: basic ideas
• simple model for flow near the contact line• singularity• microscopic physics
part 2: hydrodynamics
• dynamic contact angle?• lubrication: Cox-Voinov theory• forced wetting
outline
part 1: basic ideas
• simple model for flow near the contact line• singularity• microscopic physics
literature:
Huh & Scriven, J. Colloid Interface Sci, 35, 85 (1971)
Bonn, Eggers, Indekeu, Meunier, Rolley, to appear Rev. Mod. Phys. (2009)
corner flow
Huh & Scriven 1971:
- assume corner geometry -> straight interface- Stokes flow (no inertia)
no slip
no shear s
tress
corner flow
Huh & Scriven 1971:
- assume corner geometry -> straight interface- Stokes flow (no inertia)
co-moving with contact line (receding)
corner flow
Huh & Scriven 1971
φr
!
"2("2#) = 0
streamfunction (2D, Stokes flow):
corner flow
Huh & Scriven 1971
φr
!
"2("2#) = 0
streamfunction (2D, Stokes flow):
(note that for irrotational flow )
!
"2# = 0
corner flow
Huh & Scriven 1971
φr
!
"2("2#) = 0
streamfunction (2D):
biharmonic equation
corner flow
Huh & Scriven 1971
φr
!
" = r Asin# + Bcos# + C# sin# + D# cos#( )
streamfunction:
constants A, B, C, D from boundary conditions
corner flow
Huh & Scriven 1971
φr
!
" = r Asin# + Bcos# + C# sin# + D# cos#( )
streamfunction:
θ = 120° θ = 60°
corner flow
Huh & Scriven 1971
φr
!
" = r Asin# + Bcos# + C# sin# + D# cos#( )
streamfunction:
θ = 120° θ = 60°
what happens as r 0 ?
singularity at r=0Huh & Scriven 1971
- velocity at r = 0 multi-valued- infinite pressure and shear stress
exercise
dimensional analysis: speed Uposition r viscosity η
Fshear
exercise
dimensional analysis: speed Uposition r viscosity η
1. scaling shear stress τ with r ?
2. total shear force Fshear on plate?
Fshear
!
Fshear
~ dr" (r)r= 0
x
#
hydrodynamics fails...
... when reaching molecular scales !
Huh & Scriven 1971:
hydrodynamics fails...
... when reaching molecular scales !
hydrodynamics fails...
... when reaching molecular scales !
many different theories to ‘regularize singularity’
1. slip boundary conditions2. van der Waals forces3. molecular kinetic theory4. ...
1. slip length
slip boundary condition:
velocity at wall ~ shear stress
!
uwall = lslip"u
"z
!
lslip
1. slip length
slip boundary condition:
velocity at wall ~ shear stress
SFA, mechanical reponse (Cottin-Bizonne et al. PRL 2005)
1. slip length
slip boundary condition:
velocity at wall ~ shear stress
!
" ~#U
lslip
!
lslip
2. van der Waals forces
introducing disjoining pressure: π(h)
equilibrium shape: U=0
2. van der Waals forces
introducing disjoining pressure: π(h)
equilibrium shape: U=0
precursor film, molecular scale
2. van der Waals forces
introducing disjoining pressure: π(h)
dynamics:
precursor film, molecular scale
!
" ~#U
lfilm
1. & 2. are ’similar’
both provide regularization of hydrodynamic singularity:
slip
!
" ~#U
lmicro
precursor film
3. molecular kinetic theorythermally activated ‘hopping’ of molecules
!
freq ~ exp "E
kBT
#
$ %
&
' (
3. molecular kinetic theorythermally activated ‘hopping’ of molecules
fcl ~ γ(cosθ - cosθe)
Blake & Haynes 1969:
!
freq ~ exp "E ± fcl lmicro
2
kBT
#
$ %
&
' (
3. molecular kinetic theorythermally activated ‘hopping’ of molecules
forward/backward:
!
freq ~ exp ±fcl lmicro
2
kBT
"
# $
%
& '
fcl ~ γ(cosθ - cosθe)
contact line speed:
!
U ~ sinhfcl lmicro
2
kBT
"
# $
%
& '
3. molecular kinetic theoryliquid helium (Prevost et al. PRL 1999)
Fcl
spee
d
!
U ~ sinhfcl lmicro
2
kBT
"
# $
%
& '
3. molecular kinetic theoryliquid helium (Prevost et al. PRL 1999)
- another source of dissipation- important when viscous dissipation is small
Fcl
spee
d
!
U ~ sinhfcl lmicro
2
kBT
"
# $
%
& '
3. molecular kinetic theorydrop coalesence (Andrieu et al. JFM 2002)
3. molecular kinetic theorydrop coalesence (Andrieu et al. JFM 2002)
observed relaxation timescale: t ~ R / (10-6 m/s)
viscous time: t ~ R / (70 m/s)
4. ...
conclusion
- moving contact line: gives ’divergence’ viscous stress
- multi-scale: coupling molecular physics and macroscopic flow
- many different mechanisms
next lecture: hydrodynamics, above ~10nm