Jacco Snoeijer Physics of Fluids - University of Twente · 2019. 9. 17. · Jacco Snoeijer Physics...
Transcript of Jacco Snoeijer Physics of Fluids - University of Twente · 2019. 9. 17. · Jacco Snoeijer Physics...
-
Jacco Snoeijer
Physics of Fluids - University of Twente
contact angle hysteresis
small droplets can ‘stick’ to window
-
force on contact line
balance:γ cos θe
γslγsv
-
force on contact line
balance:
fcl = γ (cos θ - cos θe)
γ cos θe
γslγsv
force on contact line:
γ cos θ
γslγsv
-
advancing - receding angles
hysteresis: no unique value for contact angle
pinning force: H = γ (cos θr - cos θa)
-
’sticky’ drops
-
microscopic origin
geometric heterogeneity
θe θe
small scale ‘roughness’
-
microscopic origin
geometric heterogeneity chemical heterogeneity:θe(x,y)
θe θe
large θe smaller θesmall scale ‘roughness’
-
contact line shape?
-
contact line shape?
heterogeneity at larger scale: macroscopic ‘wetting defects’
single defect (500µm) many defects (10µm)
-
contact line shape?
heterogeneity at larger scale: macroscopic ‘wetting defects’
single defect (500µm) many defects (10µm)
‘simple’ dynamics collective dynamicscontact line is very ‘rough’
-
what will we do:
• contact line deformation of single defect• Joanny - De Gennes model for hysteresis• implications for dynamics...
literature:
Joanny & De Gennes, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 552 (1984)
Bonn, Eggers, Indekeu, Meunier, Rolley, to appear Rev. Mod. Phys. (2009)
-
contact line shape
θ0
z
y
-
contact line shape
θ0
z
y
yx
z
-
contact line shape
ycontact line position
z
x
y
η(x)
z
-
interface
contact line position
z
y
η(x)
interface h(x,y) ?
!
h(x,y) = "0y + ....
-
interface
contact line position
z
y
η(x)
Δh ~ e-qy
interface h(x,y) ?
!
h(x,y) = "0y + Ae
iqxe#qy
-
interface
contact line position
z
y
η(x)
change in local contact angle: Δθ(x)
-
interface
contact line position
z
y
η(x)
increase of area
ΔE ~ γ q A2
Δθ(x)
contact line ‘elasticity’
Joanny & De Gennes 1984
-
sinusoidal perturbations
contact line position
z
y
increase of area:
ΔE ~ γ q A2 Δθ(x)
-
sinusoidal perturbations
z
y
increase of area:
ΔE ~ γ q A2 Δθ(x)
relaxation rate σ
qDelon et al. JFM 2008
-
single defect
wetting defect is ‘pulling’, but....
large deformations cost energy
θ = 0
-
single defect
contact line shape ?η(x)
θ = 0
-
single defect
contact line shape ?η(x)
θ = 0
!
h(x,y) = "0y + ...
-
single defect
contact line shape ?η(x)
θ = 0
!
h(x,y) = "0y #
"0
2$dq ˜ % & (q) eiqxe#qy
-
single defect
contact line shape ?η(x)
θ = 0
!
h(x,y) = "0y #
"0
2$dq ˜ % & (q) eiqxe#qy
imposing θ(x) at the contact line η(x)
-
single defect
contact line shape ?η(x)
θ = 0
!
h(x,y) = "0y #
"0
2$dq ˜ % & (q) eiqxe#qy
!
" #$h
$y= "
0+"
0
2%dq ˜ & ' (q) q eiqxe(qy
-
single defect
contact line shape ?η(x)
θ = 0
!
h(x,y) = "0y #
"0
2$dq ˜ % & (q) eiqxe#qy
!
"(x) #"0
+"
0
2$dq ˜ % (q) q{ }& eiqx
-
single defect
η(x)θ = 0
!
"(x) ~Fdefect
#ln L / x( )
Nadkarni & Garoff 1992
!
Fdefect ~ d" 1# cos$e( )
-
model for hysteresis
advancing
‘jump’
receding
asymmetry between advancing and receding
(for defects that are strong enough)
-
model for hysteresis
!
" cos#r$ cos#
a( ) ~ % Fd&max
advancing
‘jump’
receding
non-interacting defects, density ρ
-
contact line dynamics, revisited
many defects (10µm)
-
contact line dynamics, revisited
if we go very slowly...
... thermally activated ‘hopping’ of molecules
many defects (10µm)
-
contact line dynamics, revisited
Rolley & Guthmann PRL 2007
Fcl
spee
d
!
U ~ exp "E " fcl lmicro
2
kBT
#
$ %
&
' (
thermally activated ‘hopping’ of molecules
Fcl ~ γ(cosθ - cosθe)
-
contact line dynamics, revisitedthermally activated ‘depinning’ of contact line
Rolley & Guthmann PRL 2007
Fcl
spee
d
!
U ~ exp "E " fcl lmicro
2
kBT
#
$ %
&
' (
-
coupling to hydrodynamics?for significant Ca: lubrication + slip
microscopics shows up as ‘boundary conditions’
-
conclusion
- microscopic description of hysteresis
- ’interacting defects’ are difficult... depinning, contact line roughness
- coupling to hydrodynamics??