Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp...

17
Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) Shingo Sakai (Univ. of Tsukuba) 1

Transcript of Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp...

Page 1: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss)

Shingo Sakai (Univ. of Tsukuba)

1

Page 2: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Hard probes} Investigate inside of matter

} Use well known probes } Looks modification of probes

before/after probing matter

} “Hard” probes} Jet, heavy flavours (charm & beauty), high pT particles} Originally from partonic scatterings with large momentum transfer Q2

} Large transverse momentum, Large mass ( > ΛQCD ~ 200 MeV)} Applicable perturbative QCD

} Time scale : example (heavy flavours) : } τ ~ 1/2 mq ~ 0.07 fm < QGP (~0.1-1 fm)} Produced before QGP

} Constrain medium properties : transport coefficient, η/s

?

2

Page 3: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Hard probe productions in pp collisions

n Comparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCD predictionsn Consistent with uncertainties in data and pQCD

5−10

4−10

3−10

2−10

1−10

-1 )c m

b (G

eV/

ηd Tpdσ2 d

DataSyst. unc. (data)POWHEG+PYTHIA6Syst. unc. (theory)

ALICE Preliminary = 13 TeVspp,

| < 0.5jetlab

η = 0.4, |R, Tkcharged jets, anti-c < 36 GeV/0T,D

p, 2 < 0with D

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50)c (GeV/

T,ch jetp

00.5

11.5

22.5

3

data

/ th

eory

ALI−PREL−320197

)c -1

b G

eVµ

) (

ydT

p/(

dσ2 d

2−10

1−10

1

10

210

310

stat. unc.

syst. unc.

FONLL

ALICE Preliminary

1% BR uncertainty (not shown)± , intL 5% ±

=13 TeVs, pp 0Prompt D| < 0.5 y|

)c (GeV/T

p0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

FO

NLL

Dat

a

1

2

3

ALI−PREL−130997

parton ~ jet hadronization

Charm quark (c-jet) D mesons

3

Page 4: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Hard probes in AA collisions

4

n Interact between parton and QGP n elastic scattering -> collisional energy loss (low pT)n gluon bremsstrahlung -> radiative energy loss (high pT)

n Modify hadronization processn In experiment

n Suppression of yields (Di-jet imbalance) n Modification of fragmentation functions

Page 5: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Energy loss in QCD matter

5

} Properties of radiative energy loss} 1. <ΔE> ∝ CR L2q

} Depend on color charge : quark vs. gluon} Proportional to path-length (L2)} Sensitive to transport coefficient : q = μ2/λ

} 2. Dead cone effect } Probability of radiation ; 1/(θ2 + (m/E)2)2

} Lose less energy for heavier partons} Eloss(g) > Eloss(u,d,s) > Eloss(c) > Eloss(b)

Page 6: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Charged particle spectrum in AA

n Scaled pp referencen without energy loss

n Yields in 70-80% n Same as without energy loss

n Yields in 0-10%n Spectrum shift to lower pT

n Due to energy loss n pT -> (1-εloss)pTn εloss = ΔpT/pT

ΔpT

6

Page 7: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Charged hadron RAA

7

n Nuclear modification factor

RAA > 1 : enhancement RAA = 1 : no medium effectRAA < 1 : suppression

n Strong suppression of charged particleproduction in RHIC & LHCn Minimum RAA ~ 0.1n ~90% charged hadrons are suppressed

w.r.t. pp collisions

n RAA ↔εlossn εloss = 1-RAA

1/(n-2)

n Example : π0 @ RHIC (n=8)n εloss = 0.2 for RAA ~ 0.25

Page 8: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Flavour dependence of RAA

Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 252

n Both charm and beauty lose energy in QGPn Eloss(g) > Eloss(u,d,s) > Eloss(c) > Eloss(b) => RAA(c)<RAA(b)n Smaller RAA of B mesons than D mesons

n Indicate smaller energy loss of beauty than charm8

Page 9: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Jet reconstruction

n “Jet” : defined by “Fastjet” n (Cacciari et. al. JHEP 0804 (2008) 063)

n kT algorithm: start from low pTn not bound to a circular structure

n Anti-kT algorithm: start from high pTn Circulate shape, “cone” radiusn Expected to be less sensitive to underlying event

->Suitable to heavy-ion collisions

9

pT

φ or η

Anti-kT

kT

h

Page 10: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Jet quenching !

n Jets are produced back-to-back n Recoil jets (subleading) have originally same energy as leading jetsn Clear suppression of recoil jet

n Energy loss of parton in QGP

Leading jets

Subleading jets

10

Page 11: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Jet RAA in PbPb at 5.02 TeV (0-10%)ATLAS-CONF-2017-009, M. Spouta

n Jet RAA in 0-10% in 5 TeV PbPb collisions n RAA < 1 ; Observed suppression up to 1 TeV

n 2.76 TeV up to 400 GeV/cn Suppression of jet productions in Pb-Pb collisions

11

Page 12: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

v2 (path-length dependence of energy loss)

n v2 ∝ (Nin-Nout)/(Nin+Nout)n Lout > Linn v2 > 0 ; jets in out-plane is more suppressed than in in-plane

PLB753(2016)511-525 R.P

Lout

Lin

12

Page 13: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Di-jet momentum balance

PRL105, 252303 (2010) n Excess of imbalanced jets from peripheral to centraln Aj->0 : balance / Aj->1 : imbalance

13

Page 14: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Jet Fragmentation in PbPb

14

n Enhancement at low zn Due to energy loss by partons is transferred predominantly to soft particles

n Enhancement at high zn Large quark jet contribution in PbPb, and quark jets likely to produce high-z particles

Phys. Rev. C 98, 024908

Page 15: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Jet-track correlation

n Particle distribution w.r.t. axis of leading jets (>120 GeV/c)n A excess of low pT particles (pT < 3 GeV/c) extending to large

Δr from jet axis is foundn ΔE uses to produce lower pT particles at large R

pp

H. Trauger

15

Page 16: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Jet – medium interaction

n Enhancement at large R due to jet – medium interaction ?

n A model with energy loss + hydrodenamical modelwell represents the enhancen Full jets shower interact

with medium by radiative& collisional process

n Deposit the energy to the medium and then evolve with the medium hydrodynamically.

16

Phys. Rev. C 95, 044909 (2017)V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration)

Report No. CMS-PAS-HIN-15-011 (2015).

Page 17: Hard probes (jet quenching, energy loss) · 2019. 8. 28. · Hard probe productions in pp collisions nComparison of hard probes, c-jets (left) and D mesons (right), with pQCDpredictions

Summary

17

Single particle RAA<1

Strongly suppression productions

jetAddress kinematics of parton

RAA<1Mometum imbalance of Di-jet

Energy loss of partons in QGP