Fabio Dall’Olio · 2012. 10. 26. · From: Trinchera et al. 2011 By immunoblot analysis, only a...
Transcript of Fabio Dall’Olio · 2012. 10. 26. · From: Trinchera et al. 2011 By immunoblot analysis, only a...
BIOSYNTHESIS OF CANCER-RELATED
CARBOHYDRATE ANTIGENS
Fabio Dall’OlioDepartment of Experimental Pathology
University of Bologna, Italy
)
TOPICS OF THE LECTURE
1. Structure and function of some representative cancer-associated
carbohydrate antigens
β1,6-branchingSialyl-Lewis antigens
Sia6LacNAc
2. Mechanisms leading to the expression of cancer-associated carbohydrate
antigens
Overexpression of glycosyltransferases
Altered glycosidase expression
Masking of sugar structures by substituent groups
Competition between normal and cancer-associated carbohydrate structures
3. Glycosylation and cell signalling: a bi-directional talk
)
1. SOME CANCER-ASSOCIATED
CARBOHYDRATE ANTIGENS
ββββ1,6-branchingSialyl-Lewis antigens
Sia6LacNAc
)
Siaαααα2,3(6)Galββββ1,4GlcNAcββββ1,2Man
Manββββ1,4GlcNAcββββ1,4GlcNAc-Asn
Siaαααα2,3(6)Galββββ1,4GlcNAcββββ1,2Man
Siaαααα2,3Galββββ1,4GlcNAcββββ1,3(Galββββ1,4GlcNAc)nββββ1,3Galββββ1,4GlcNAcββββ1,6
Fucαααα1,3
Siaαααα2,3(6)Galββββ1,4GlcNAcββββ1,2Man
Manββββ1,4GlcNAcββββ1,4GlcNAc-Asn
Siaαααα2,3(6)Galββββ1,4GlcNAcββββ1,2Man
GnT5
GnT3
Bisecting GlcNAc
ββββ1,6-branching
Siaαααα2,3(6)Galββββ1,4GlcNAcββββ1,2Man
GlcNAcββββ1,4Manββββ1,4GlcNAcββββ1,4GlcNAc-Asn
Siaαααα2,3(6)Galββββ1,4GlcNAcββββ1,2Man
ββββ1,6 BRANCHING AND BISECTING GlcNAc ARE
ALTERNATIVE STRUCTURES
An N-linked chain can be transformed in a β1,6-branched structure (upper) by the action of GnT5.
The β1,6-linked branch is frequently elongated by polylactosaminic chains, which are often
terminated by complex structures, such as the sialyl Lex antigen. The action of GnT3 leads to the
addition of a bisecting GlcNAc, which inhibits the formation of the β1,6-branched structure.
From: Dall’Olio et al. Carbohydr. Chem. 2012 37 21-56
ββββ1,6-BRANCHING AND METASTASIS
1. The ββββ1,6-branching, as detected with
leukoagglutinin (L-PHA), is associated with
metastasis (Dennis et al. 1987)
2. GnT5 is controlled by ras and other oncogenes (Lu
et al. 1993).
3. GnT5 null mice in a PyMT background display
strong inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis
(Granowsky et al. 2000)
4. ββββ1,6-branched glycans on growth factor receptors
enhance their signalling, through interaction with
galectin-3 (Lau et al. 2007).
5. ββββ1,6-branched glycans stabilize matriptase, an
activator of hepatocyte growth factor (Ihara et al.
2004)
)
SIALYL LEWIS ANTIGENSThe basic units of
type 1 or type 2
chains are obtained
by the addition on
GlcNAc of a β1,3-
linked or a β1,4-linked
galactose,
respectively. The
α2,3-sialylation of
type 1 or 2 chains,
followed by the
addition of α1,4- or
α1,3-linked fucose,
respectively, leads to
the biosynthesis of
the sialyl Lea (sLea)
and sialyl Lex (sLex)
antigens.
)
ROLE OF SELECTIN INTERACTIONS
DURING CELL EXTRAVASATION
Selectin ligands sLea/sLex on circulating cells interact with E and P-
selectins expressed by activated endothelia. These interactions
mediate the tethering and rolling of leukocytes or cancer cells. The
firm adhesion, which precedes extravasation is mediated by
integrins.
)
SIALYL LEWIS ANTIGENS AND CANCER
1.The up-regulation of sialyl Lewis
antigens (sLe) is frequently observed in
cancer (Izawa et al. 2000)
2.sLea (CA19.9) is a widely used tumor
marker
3.In many systems sLe antigens are
associated with metastasis
4.sLe antigens are selectin-ligands
)
From: Izawa et al. 2000
SIALYL LEWIS-X ANTIGEN IS
OVEREXPRESSED IN COLON CANCER
Staining with the anti sLex
antibody CSLEX reveals
that sLex is expressed only
by cancer tissues.
Patient
normaltumor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617
5
2.5
0
sL
ex
(a
rbit
rary
un
its
)
From: Trinchera et al. 2011
By immunoblot analysis,
only a few colon cancer
tissues express high
levels of sLex
)
Manββββ1,4GlcNAcββββ1,4GlcNAc---Asn
Galββββ1,4GlcNAcββββ1,
Galββββ1,4GlcNAcββββ1,
Galββββ1,4GlcNAcββββ1,2
6
3
Manαααα1
Manαααα1
6
3
Siaαααα2,6
Siaαααα2,6
Siaαααα2,6
αααα2,6-SIALYLATED LACTOSAMINE (Sia6LacNAc)
Sialic acid can be linked to lactosaminic chains either
through a αααα2,3- or a αααα2,6-linkage.
ST6Gal.1 mediates this reaction on glycoproteins
Sambucus nigra agglutinin (SNA) recognizes
Sia6LacNAc
)
Sia6LacNAc AND CANCER
1.The up-regulation of ST6Gal.1 and/or
Sia6LacNAc is frequently observed in
cancers (Dall’Olio 2000a, Dall’Olio et al.
2001)
2.The ββββ1 subunit of integrins is a substrate
of ST6Gal.1 (Seales et al. 2005)
3.High ST6Gal.1 induces radiation
resistance (Lee et al. 2008)
4.Breast cancers developed by ST6Gal.1
null mice in a PyMT background are more
differentiated (Hedlund et al. 2008)
)
ST6Gal.1 AND αααα2,6 SIALYLATED SUGAR
CHAINS INCREASE IN COLORECTAL CANCER
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Normale
Tumorale
ST6Gal.I activity increases in nearly
100% of the colorectal cancer cases
although at a variable level among
patients (Dall’Olio et al. 1989, 2000b)
The increase of Sia6LacNAc
expression, detected with SNA,
marks the transition between normal
and cancer tissue (Dall’Olio and
Trerè 1993)
ST6Gal.I IS UNDER THE CONTROL
OF THE RAS ONCOGENE
Northern blot analysis
of mock-transfected
and K-ras transfected
NIH3T3 cells with
probes for different
sialyltransferases.
Only ST6Gal.I shows
ras-dependent
modulation
SNA FACS
analysis of mock-
transfected and K-
ras transfected
NIH3T3 cells. Ras
expression
induces αααα2,6-
sialylation of cell
membrane.
From: Dalziel et al. 2004
)
Mock ST6Gal.1+
Day 0
Day 6
PHENOTYPIC CHANGES INDUCED BY ST6Gal.1
EXPRESSION IN SW948 COLON CANCER CELLS
From: Chiricolo et al. 2006
0
0,5
1
1,5
3,5 7 14
Fibronectin (µg/well)
A6
50
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
14 21 42
Collagen IV (µg/well)
A6
50
**
**
*
Fibronectin
Collagen IV
A B C
A: adhesion to ECM components (grey=mock;
black=ST6Gal.1+)
B: scratch wound assay
C: SNA reactivity (left) and morphology (right) of
ST6Gal.1+ cells.
)
2. MECHANISMS DRIVING THE
EXPRESSION OF CANCER-RELATED
CARBOHYDRATE ANTIGENS
Overexpression of glycosyltransferases
Altered glycosidase expression
Masking by substituent groups
Competition between glycosyltransferases
)
THE OVEREXPRESSION OF CARBOHYDRATE
STRUCTURES IS USUALLY MULTIFACTORIAL
Structure
overexpression
Cognate glycosyltransferase↑
Competing glycosyltransferases ↓
Glycosidases ↓Masking by substituents ↓e.g.: Neu sialidases
e.g.: ST6Gal.1
GnT5
e.g.: ββββ4GalNAcT2/sLex
GnT3/ββββ1,6-branching
e.g.: O-acetylation of sialic acids
)
INCREASE OF COGNATE GLYCOSYLTRANSFERASE:
ST6Gal.1 AND SNA REACTIVITY
From: Dall’Olio et al. Glycobiology 2004
The SNA reactivity and the
ST6Gal.1 activity of 21 pairs
of cancer and non-cancer
liver tissues were
determined and plotted.
The relationship between
SNA and ST6Gal.1 is non
linear, indicating that
factors other than ST6Gal.1
activity affect the
biosynthesis of Sia6LacNAc
)
MASKING BY SUBSTITUENTS: O-
ACETYLATION OF SIALIC ACIDS
Untreated
N T N T N T N T N T N T N T N T N T N T
Patient number
2.5 µµµµg
1.2 µµµµg
0.6 µµµµg
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Alkali-treated
anti sLex
O-acetyl groups on sialic acids can hinder the recognition of sialylated
sugar antigens by antibodies (Ogata et al. 1995). Removal of O- acetyl
groups by alkali enhances the detection of sLex in normal colon
From: Malagolini et al. Glycobiology 2007
2.5 µµµµg
1.2 µµµµg
0.6 µµµµg
)
DECREASED GLYCOSIDASE
EXPRESSION: SIALIDASES
1.Neu sialidases are a group of 4 enzymes
with different intracellular localization
2.Downregulation of lysosomal Neu1 in
cancer promotes anchorage-independent
growth and metastatic ability
3.Over-expression of cytosolic Neu2 leads
to reduced invasion of cancer cells
(Miyagi et al. 2008)
)
COMPETITION BETWEEN THE sLex AND
Sda ANTIGENS IN COLON CANCER
normal tumor5
2.5
sLex
P<0.0001
Attiv
ità F
ucT
-VI
0
5
10
3 6sLex
tumor
normal
sLex0
4
8
0.3 0.6
NS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
12
6
0
FucT
-VI activ
ity
Patient
A
B
D
C
Attiv
ità F
ucT
-VI
A: sLex is highly
expressed by some
cancer tissues and
very little by normal
tissue.
B: Its biosynthetic
enzyme (FucT-VI) is
high in both normal
and cancer.
sLex correlates with
FucT-VI in cancer (C)
but not in normal
tissue (D).
From: Trinchera et al. 2011
)
ENZIMATIC BASIS OF REDUCED sLex
BIOSYNTHESIS IN NORMAL COLON
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 170
Patient
1
2
Attiv
itàββ ββ4GalN
AcT
-II
normal tumor
ββββ4GalNAcT-II is down-
regulated in colon cancer
tissuesFucT
-VI/ββ ββ4GalN
AcT
-II
sLex
P<0.0001
In normal colon sLex
correlates with the FucT-
VI/ ββββ4GalNAcT-II ratio
❠❠
Sda AND sLex ANTIGENS
Neu5Acαααα2,3Galββββ1,4GlcNAc-R
“Good” Sda
“Bad” sLex
GalNAcββββ1,4
Neu5Acαααα2,3Galββββ1,4GlcNAc-R
Fucαααα1,3
Neu5Acαααα2,3Galββββ1,4GlcNAc-R
❠❠
Expression of ββββ4GalNAcT-II
results in sLex inhibition in dot
blot analysis (A), FACS (B) and
fluorescence microscopy (C).
ββββ4GalNAcT-II INHIBITS sLex BIOSYNTHESIS IN
LS174T COLON CANCER CELLS
Mock
25 12.5 6 3 1.5 0.7
µµµµg homogenate
Anti sLex
Mock ββββ4GalNAcT-II+A
nti S
da
An
ti sL
ex
ββββ4GalNAcT-II+
mock
ββββ4GalNAcT-II+
Malagolini et al. 2007
A
B
C
)
Sda
sLex
Normal Tumor
FucT-VI
ββββ4GalNAcT-II
ββββ4GalNAcT-II
FucT-VI
Reduced ββββ4GalNAcT-II expression in cancer tissue results in sLex
overexpression even in the presence of constant FucT-VI activity
BALANCE BETWEEN Sda AND
sLex ANTIGENS IN COLON
ʐ❠
3. GLYCOSYLATION AND CELL
SIGNALLING: A BI-DIRECTIONAL TALK
The cancer-related carbohydrate
changes can be at the same time
the cause and the effect of the
malignant phenotype
❠❠
DYNAMIC OF CANCER-ASSOCIATED
GLYCOSYLATION CHANGES
Cell
transformation
Glycosylation
changes
Inside out
Outside in
Altered
phenotype
Cancer
markers
)
Sia6LacNAc ββββ1,6-branching
Integrins
Growth Factor Receptors
Oncogene signalling
EXAMPLE OF BI-DIRECTIONAL SIGNALLING
Outside-in signalling. Sugar
structures, such as Sia6
LacNAc and ββββ1,6-branching,
decorate cell surface molecules,
including integrins and growth
factor receptors. This results in
a potentiation of their signalling,
eventually leading to oncogene
activation.
Inside-out signalling.
Oncogenes like ras, directly up-
regulate the expression of the
enzymes (ST6Gal.1 and GnT5)
which synthesize Sia6LacNAc
and ββββ1,6-branching.
This bidirectional signalling
might create a self-fuelling loop.
❠❠
ESSENTIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY
Chiricolo et al. Glycobiology 16, 146-154 (2006)
Dall’Olio et al. Int. J. Cancer 44, 434-439 (1989)
Dall’Olio and Trerè Eur. J. Histochem. 37, 257-265 (1993)
Dall’Olio Glycoconj. J. 17,669-676 (2000)
Dall’Olio et al. Int. J. Cancer 88, 58-65 (2000)
Dall’Olio and Chiricolo Glycoconj. J. 18, 841-850 (2001)
Dall’Olio et al. Glycobiology 14, 39-49 (2004)
Dall’Olio F. et al. Front. Biosci. 17, 670-699 (2012)
Dall’Olio et al. Carbohydrate Chemistry 37, 21-56 (2012)
Dalziel et al. Eur. J. Biochem. 271, 3623-3634 (2004)
Dennis et al. Science 236, 585-585 (1987)
Granowsky et al. Nat. Med. 6, 306-312 (2000)
Hedlund et al. Cancer Res. 68, 388-394 (2008)
Ihara et al. Glycobiology 14, 139-146 (2004)
Izawa et al. Cancer Res. 60, 1410-1416 (2000)
Lau et al. Cell 129, 123-134 (2007)
Lee et al. Mol. Cancer. Res. 6 1316-1325 (2008)
Lu et al. Mol. Cell Biochem. 122, 85-92 (1993)
Malagolini et al. Glycobiology 17, 688-697 (2008)
Miyagi et al. Proteomics 8, 3303-3311 (2008)
Ogata et al. Cancer Res. 55, 1869-1874 (1995)
Seales et al. Cancer Res. 65, 4645-4652 (2005)
Trinchera et al. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 43, 130-139 (2011)