CO2 Acquisition In Cyanobacteria: Some Things Do Change...
Transcript of CO2 Acquisition In Cyanobacteria: Some Things Do Change...
CO2 Acquisition In Cyanobacteria: Some Things Do Change – Evolution & diversity
Dean PriceMolecular Plant Physiology Group, Res Sch Biological Sciences, Australian National University
Murray Badger,Fiona Woodger, Ben Long, Loraine Tucker,Megan Shelden,Spencer Whitney,Ben Rae, Susan Howitt (BaMBi)
0.5 μM
carboxysomes
thylakoids
Theory of natural selection
• Wallace & Darwin provided the basic framework for understanding the evolution and diversity in living things; these ideas apply very well to cyanobacteria. • Darwin did not know about DNA, genes & direct transfer of traits, had he done so, he would have certainly suggested rapid periods of evolution by “horizontal gene transfer”. • HGT appears to have played a significant role in cyanobacterial & bacterial evolution, particularly in CO2 acquisition processes.
Evolution & diversity of CO2 acquisition in cyanobacteria: Areas covered
• What are cyanobacteria? • The problems of surviving in aquatic environments.• When did the cyanobacterial lineage begin ?• Evolutionary pressures on Rubisco (primary CO2 fixing enzyme)• Evolution of the cyanobacterial CO2 concentrating mechanism.• Attributes and diversity of cyanobacterial CCMs.• When did the CCM evolve and why did C3 plants “miss out”?
What are cyanobacteria ?• Also known as Blue-Green algae, the cyanobacteria are an ancient linage of photosynthetic bacteria that utilise chlorophyll for light harvesting.•They inhabit an amazing diversity of ecological niches from marine, freshwater, polar, desert crusts, plant or lichen symbioses, soda lakes, hypersaline lakes, hot springs, etc; some are primary nitrogen-fixers.
• Several clades, but essentially filamentous or unicellular (single-celled).
• They evolve Oxygen and use Rubisco to fix CO2 into sugars.
Synechococcus
Trichodesmium
Nostoc
Some cyanobacteria are also opportunists when N & P are in good supply
Algae outbreak hampers Olympic sailing preparations, Qingdao, China (www.abc.net.au)
Chloro
phyll s
olar
cell
RubiscoRubisco
CO2
electrons
Sugars
Biomass / fossil fuels
Light reactions
Dark reactionsO2
H2O
The two sides of photosynthesis
CO2
Scanning EM, The Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis
Synechococcus
2.8 x 0.8 μM For freshwater Synechococcus species, about 27,000 cells should fit on the head of pin (carefully packed).
- Deep sea Synechococcus ~50,000.- Filamentous strains 5-10,000 cells/pinhead- (3-5 million carboxysomes per pinhead)
How many cyanobacterial cells will fit on the head of pin?
Magnification
Ultrastructure of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002(formerly Agmenellum quadruplicatum PR-6)
carboxysome
D_Price/7002em.cdr
thylakoid IMOM
Electron-micrographs of ultra-thin sections embedded in epoxy resin & doped with heavy metals.
Ultrastructure of Synechococcus sp. PCC7002 (a halo-estuarine species)
Molecular Biology of the Cell, Fifth Edition, Garland Science 2008
A cyanobacterial ancestor was the progenitor of the modern day chloroplast
The plant chloroplast is the essential primary production factory for sugars & starch, and ultimately biomass.Terrestrial crops & ecosystems would be unsustainable without this ancient endosymbiont.
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/NPP/npp.html
Almost 50% of global primary productivity is oceanic** C Field, et al. Science 282, 237 (1998)
2002 Net Primary Production
cyanobacteria, diatoms, macro-algae, seagrass, etc.
cyanobacteria ~ 25% of global productivity. marine foodweb/fisheries.
Limitations on CO2-fixation for cyanobacteria, algae & aquatic plants
• Poor CO2 diffusion in water (104 slower than air)• Temperature• Light• Oxygen• Poor buffering, poor mixing• Nutrient depletion
fluctuations
Inorganic carbon (Ci) species in aquatic environments: a good strategy is to utilise HCO3
- for photosynthesis
H+ + HCO3-
CO2
CO32- + H+H2O + CO2
• CO2 diffusion in water is 10 4 slower than in air (slow supply rate).
• CO2 supply rate impacted by temperature, pH, demand, mixing, etc.
• CO2 HCO3- interconversion is slow at pH 8 (t1/2 ~ 15 sec).
• At high pH, CO2 can be trapped as HCO3- or CO3
=
eg. at pH 8 the CO2air: Ci
aq ratio is ~ 35.
(10 -12 μM)(CO2 + OH - HCO3
-)Carbonic anhydrase
pKa ~ 6.3 pKa ~ 10.3
air
water
When did the cyanobacterial lineage begin ?
Present-day stromatolites, Shark Bay, WA (low tide)
Living fossils
Billions of Years Ago04 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.54.5
Rise in Atmospheric
Oxygen
Fossil stromatolites
Humans
Early land plants
Hard-shelled Animals
First single cells with a
NucleusFirst sedimentary rocks with
isotopic signs of life
Moon forms Tides
Formation of Earth
Earliest fossils
Dinosaurs
Present-day stromatolites
Filamentous Cyanobacteria
Oxygenic photosynthesis
First multi-celled
eukaryotes
Phoenix Lander: water on Mars?
?
A condensed view of cyanobacterial evolution
High CO2/ low O2
low CO2 / high O2
Chemoautotrophs?
Plants cells with
chloroplasts
Limitations imposed by the CO2-fixing enzyme, Rubisco
• Rubisco, Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase, is a relatively inefficient enzyme.• But it evolved when atmospheric conditions differed greatly form modern atmospheric conditions.
Rubisco L8S8 crystal structure
Side view Top View
CO2
O2
PGA
P-glycolate
Problems for Rubisco• Low affinity for CO2• Oxygen as an alternate substrate• Problems increase with temperature
sugarsproductive
wasteful
productive
wasteful
High CO2& low O2
Low CO2 & high O2
3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
ARCHAEAN PROTEROZOIC PHANEROZOIC
Millions of Years Before Present
Rubisco becomes challenged
The problems for Rubisco
CO2
O2
PGA
P-glycolate
Problems for Rubisco• Low affinity for CO2• Oxygen as an alternate substrate• Problems increase with temperature
sugarsproductive
wasteful
productive
wasteful
Evolve a better Rubisco• Higher affinity for CO2• More discerning for CO2• But, lower catalytic efficiency & higher N requirements
Develop a CO2 Concentrating Mechanism (CCM)
• Cyanobacteria• Algae; Aquatic plants• Land plants
Turbo-chargingprotein evolution
Two evolutionary choices to solve the problems
The CO2-concentrating mechanism (CCM) infreshwater/oceanic cyanobacteria
HCO3-
CO2
CO2
Ci pumps
Carboxysome
Rubisco
CA
HCO3-
HCO3-
leak
proteincoat
Thylakoids
HCO3-
NADPH dehydrogenase(cyclic electron flow)
Ci delivered as HCO3-
- up to 1000x accumulation(chemical disequilibria)
Active uptake:multiple systems
specifically localisedcarbonic anhydrase
HCO3- converted to CO2
inside micro-compartmentcontaining Rubisco
CO2 leakage needs to be minimised (carboxysome shell & CO2 pump)
Outcomes: Rubisco operates at catalytic maximum nitrogen-use efficiency & very low photorespiration better ecological fitness.
Plot of Ci response for low and high-Ci cells
External Ci, mM (pH 8)0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Pho
tosy
nthe
sis,
μm
ol.c
ell-1
.s-1
0
5e-13
1e-12
2e-12
2e-12
3e-12
3e-12
Low-Ci High-Ci No CCM
air equilibrium Ci
How effective is the cyanobacterial CCM?
e.g. Mutants with defective carboxysomes or no CO2 uptake
Porin ?
SbtA
Na+
HCO3-
HCO3-
Na+
Outermembrane
Plasma membrane
HCO3- HCO3
-
CO2
K0.5(HCO3-) K0.5(HCO3
-)
Cytosol
Passive entry
H+
PxcA
D
HCO3-
CmpC
B B
HCO3-
HCO3-
K0.5(HCO3-)
~ 15 μM
ATP
ATP
The suite of Ci-uptake systems in cyanobacteria
Two CO2 uptake systems
Two Na+-dependent HCO3
- transporters
Traffic ATPase(BCT1)
Peptidoglycan layer
HCO3-
Thylakoid membrane
NADPHOr Fd
CO2
H+
ChpY
NdhD3NdhF3
NDH-13complex
NdhB
HCO3-
NADPHOr FdCO2
H+
ChpX
NdhD4NdhF4 NDH-14
complexNdhB
HCO3-
2-5 μM 40-100 μM
Lumen
SbtABicA
Low CO2 induction
Constitutive: lower affinity state
(Ci excess eg. 5% CO2 in air)
Inducible: higher affinity state
(Ci deficiency eg. 20 ppm CO2)
The cyanobacterial CCM has two extreme states:Needed to evolve genetic systems for fine control of expression
Na+ ?
HCO3-
Carboxysome
HCO3-
CO2
Thylakoid
e-
CO2
Na+ ?
ATP
HCO3-
CO2
HCO3-
CA
Rubiscoe-
HCO3-
CO2
HCO3-
e-
P
Ci pool ~ 20 mM max
Net transport affinityK0.5 (Ci) ~ 200 μM
Net transport affinityK0.5 (Ci) ~ 10-15 μM
Ci pool ~ 40 mM max
CO2
HCO3-
CA
Rubisco
Na+
HCO3-
CO2
HCO3-
CA
Rubisco
Ci Transporters probably evolved from existing nutrient transporters or complexes
Respiratory complexNADPH dehydrogenase respiratory complex
Low affinity CO2 uptake; Constitutive;ChpX unique protein
Ndh-I3
Major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter
Sodium symporter family(prokaryotes)
High affinity HCO3- uptake;
Na+-dependentSbtA
Respiratory complexNADPH dehydrogenase respiratory complex
High affinity CO2 uptake; Low-CO2 inducible;ChpY (related to ChpX)
Ndh-I4
Proton dependent sulphate uptake
SulP family(present in Eukaryotes & prokaryotes)
Medium affinity HCO3-
uptake; Na+-dependentBicA
High affinity nitrate/nitrite uptake
NrtABCD - NRT1bacterial ABC transporter
High affinity HCO3- uptake;
Traffic ATPaseCmpABCD (BCT1)
Homologue FunctionClosest homologueCCM FunctionUptake System
Two types of NDH-1 complexes in thylakoids
Herranen et al., 2004. Plant Physiology 134: 470-481
Prommeenate et al., 2004. J Biol Chem 279: 28165-28173
D3
F3
NDH-1L NDH-1M NDH-1S
B/C/E/G B/C/E/G
H/J/K
slr1623H/J/K
slr1623
sll1262 sll1262I
A
e- ? e- ?
I
AD1/D2
F1
chpY
CO2 HCO3-
sll1735
e-
H+
Thylakoid membrane
Respiratory CO2 uptake
NDH-1 = NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (Plastoquinone oxidoreductase)
14+ proteins 15+ proteins
Carboxysome function & protein make-up
Anabaena carboxysome PCC6803 carboxysome
50 nm
Icosahedron (20 identical
facets) (Kerfeld et al Science 2005)
• Carboxysomes are micro-compartments (mini-organelles) that are essential for efficient CO2 fixation in cyanobacteria.• Rubisco is packaged into the polyhedral structure
On the basis of Rubisco & carboxysome types the cyanobacteria divide into two basic groups
• α-cyanobacteria (mostly deep oceanic forms); Form 1A.• β-cyanobacteria (freshwater and coastal species); Form 1B.• each have distinctive characteristics.
0.5 μM
carboxysomes
0.1
Syn PCC7942
Syn PCC7002PCC6803
Crocosphaera
Gloeobacter
Thermosynechococcus
Anabaena variabilis
Nostoc PCC7120
Nostoc punctiformeNodularia
Syn JA-2-3B'a
Syn JA-3-3Ab Trichodesmium
Lyngbya
Pro NATL2A
Pro MIT9312Pro CCMP1986
Pro MIT9313Pro CCMP1375
Pro MIT9211
Syn CC9311Syn CC9902
Syn BL107
Syn WH8102
Syn WH5701Syn CC9605Syn RS9917
Syn RS9916
β-cyanobacteriafreshwater/coastal
α-cyanobacteriaoceanic Synechococcus
α-cyanobacteriaProchlorococcus (oceanic)
Form 1A
Form 1A
Form 1B
Two groups of cyanobacteria based on Rubisco & carboxysome types
Form 1B Rubisco = β-cyanobacteria(β-carboxysomes)
ccmKLMNO genes, ccaA
Form 1A Rubisco = α-cyanobacteria(α-carboxysomes)
cso genes
Phylogenetic tree for RbcL protein relatedness
Two types of carboxysomes in cyanobacteria
Synechococcus WH8102
Prochlorococcus marinus MED4
Synechococcus PCC7942ccmK ccmL ccmOccmN rbcL rbcS
β - carboxysomes
Missing
ccmM
Synechococcus PCC7002
Form 1B
Form 1A
ccmK ccmL ccmNccmM rbcL rbcSrbcX
rbcL csoS3csoS2 csoS4ab ndhF4rbcS ndhD4 chpX
ndhF4 ndhD4 chpXcsoS1 rbcL csoS3csoS2 csoS4abrbcS
csoS1
csoS1 orf
orf
cbbX
cbbXHalothiobacillus neapolitanus
rbcL csoS3csoS2 csoS4abcrbcS
csoS1ab
α - carboxysomes
First sequenced bacterial Micro-compartment (BMC) genes
Gene clusters
clues to HGT
Two Carboxysome types have arisen by parallel evolution
α-carboxysomes
Form 1A Rubisco
CA Function
Shell proteins: CsoS1a,b,c
CsoS2 CsoS3CsoS4
CcmKCcmLCcmOCcmM CcmN
Some small proteins are related to each other, and have “bacterial micro-compartment” domain signatures.
CsoS2, CsoS3, CcmM & CcmN have no significant sequence homologies – but there appear to be some structural equivalents.
Specific CA types vary, but the shell protein CsoS3 is a CA, and CcmM has a gamma-CA N-terminus region & CcaA is bound.
CsoS3
CO2HCO3-
Form 1B Rubisco
CA
CO2
CcmM
HCO3-
CcaA
β-carboxysomes
Two carboxysome types in cyanobacteria: some proteins are related
• Some proteins are related at an amino acid sequence and structural level.• prime evidence of HGT
α –cyanobacteria& sulphur bacteria
β -cyanobacteria
CsoS4ab
CsoS1abc
Form-1A Rubisco
CcmL
CcmK,CcmO
Form-1B Rubisco
Salmonella enterosome*
* 1,2-propanediol utilization (pdu)
PduA, PduJ
PduK, N & T
NA
The small shell proteins have similar folded structures
Crystal structure of ccmK1 (hexameric)
Work of S Kerfeld & T Yeates, Berkeley
CsoS1
ccmL homologues (pentameric)
CcmM58 trimer nucleus
Cross-sectional view
50 nm
11 nm
CcmM35
CcaA dimer
SSU binding domain L8-Rubisco
CcmM58 trimer nucleus
11 nm
3 nm
CcmK1 Hexamer
6.7 nm
Icosahedral carboxysome
Proposed that each CcmM58-trimer-nuclei can associate with CccM35 units to form a 7-unit core as the basis for each facet.
A Model for carboxysome shell formation based on CcmM-Rubisco complexes:
Long et al., J. Biol Chem, 2007
CCM Diversity(Resources: 42 fully sequenced genomes)
---Synechococcus CC9902
---Prochlorococcus SS120
---Prochlorococcus MIT9312
---Prochlorococcus MIT9313
---Prochlorococcus MED4
--Synechococcus CC9311
---Synechococcus CC9605
---Synechococcus WH8102
-Crocosphaera watsonii
---Trichodesmium erythraeum
-Synechococcus PCC7002
--Gloeobacter violaceus
-Thermosynechococcus
Nostoc punctiforme
Anabaena variabilis
Nostoc PCC7120
Synechococcus PCC7942
Synechocystis PCC6803
Ndh-13Ndh-14BicASbtABCT1
CO2 uptakeBicarbonate uptakeSpecies
Medium
Low
HighHomology
oceanic
coastal
freshwater
hot springsterrestrial mats
Diversity of Ci-transporters in cyanobacteria
No CO2uptake genes
Verified transport activity
When did cyanobacterial CCMs evolve?
HCO3-
CO2
CO2
Ci pumps
Carboxysome
Rubisco
CA
HCO3-
HCO3-
leak
proteincoat
Thylakoids
HCO3-
NADPH dehydrogenase(cyclic electron flow)
Evolution of Cyanobacterial and Algal CCMsCrunch-time: A marked period during the Carboniferous when a sharp decline in CO2 levels occurred along with a sharp rise in O2 levels.
Maximum selection pressure for CCMs
3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
ARCHAEAN PROTEROZOIC PHANEROZOIC
Millions of Years Before Present
Cyanobacteria
O2 evolving photosynthesis
40
20
10
0
RCO2(past/present)
CARB IIImodel
30
O2 %
Start of cyanobacterialand algal CCMs ?
John Raven, U. Dundee
Bob Berner, Yale
CO2
O2
3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
ARCHAEAN PROTEROZOIC PHANEROZOIC
Millions of Years Before Present
40
20
10
0
RCO2(past/present)
30
O2 %
CO2Plants
Algae
Oxygen evolving photosynthesisCyanobacteria
O2
High CO2 & low O2 Low CO2 & high O2
Cyanobacteria were the ancestors of plant
chloroplasts
Rubisco
Evolution of photosynthesis & atmospheric side-effects
The potential path of CCM evolution in cyanobacteria
α-Carboxysomes
Low CO2 trigger - 250-400 MYA
Microcompartment geneprecursors and transfers
β-Cyanobacteria α−Cyanobacteria Autotrophicproteobacteria
Form 1A Rubisco and α-Carboxysome gene transfer?
?? ??
Form 1A RubiscoRubisco Form 1A gene transfer
Form 1B Rubisco
β−Carboxysomes
NDH1 CO2uptake systems
Low affinity HCO3-
transporters
High affinity HCO3-
transporters
Proteobacteria
α-Carboxysomes
Multiple HGT events
Transferring parts of the cyanobacterial CCM to C3 chloroplasts??
The goal of improving water and nitrogen-use efficiencies
wheatcanola
Most key crop plants do NOT have a CCM (known as C3 plants)
• C3 crops plants lose around 500 water molecules for every CO2 gained by passive diffusion via stomata (high water cost).
• A large fraction of cellular nitrogen is devoted to the key carboxylase, Rubisco (a large nitrogen cost).
• But, C4 plants such as maize and sugar cane have a complex CCM and use ~ half the water cf. C3 plants
• Introduction of parts of the cyanobacterial CCM into C3 crop plants could be expected to improve water and nitrogen-use efficiency.
Stomatal cavity
Stomata on a leaf surface
Prospects for Genetic Engineering
Rubisco-CA complex
CO2
CO2HCO3
-
HCO3- pump
C3 Chloroplast
Na+
CA
Rubisco
NDH-1 drivenCO2 uptake
NADPH
HCO3-
HCO3-
Goal: improved water & Nitrogen-use efficiencies(akin to the “C4 rice” concept, but wheat and barley are more obvious targets in semi-arid agriculture).
HCO3- uptake
Placing a basal form of the CCM in C3 chloroplasts
Carboxysome or pseudo-pyrenoid