498: Characterization of 20α reductases and 5α reductase enzyme expression in human fetal...
Transcript of 498: Characterization of 20α reductases and 5α reductase enzyme expression in human fetal...
498 Characterization of 20� reductases and 5� reductaseenzyme expression in human fetal membranesJennifer McIntosh1, Eric Knudtson1, Daniel Jackson1,Kimberly Pecinosky1, Dean Myers1
1University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology,Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Oklahoma City, OKOBJECTIVE: Progesterone is essential for maintaining pregnancy. Inthe fetal membranes, progesterone limits prostaglandin (PG) produc-tion during pregnancy. One potential mechanism for a local proges-terone withdrawal in fetal membranes is a local progesterone metab-olism to inactive metabolites via 20� reductases (aldoketo reductase(AKR) 1C1, C2 and C3) and 5� reductase (5�RDT). However, theexpression of these enzymes in the fetal membranes has not beendescribed. We hypothesized that members of the AKR1C and/or5�RDT enzymes are expressed in one or more components of the fetalmembranes.STUDY DESIGN: Placentas from were obtained under sterile conditionsfrom consented subjects (n�3) undergoing term, scheduled cesareandelivery without having undergone labor. For each, the fetal mem-branes were then separated into the amnion, chorion and decidua andsnap frozen at -80. The presence of messenger RNA (mRNA) forAKR1C1, AKR1C2, AKR1C3 and 5�RDT-type II was assessed by us-ing reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) in triplicate followed by aga-rose gel electrophoresis with ethidium staining. Human cervical fi-broblasts were used for comparison, as presence of all of theseenzymes have previously been found and described. Cyclophilin wasused as a housekeeping gene.RESULTS: AKR1C2, AKR1C3 as well as 5�RDT-II were expressed inamnion, chorion and decidua. AKR1C1 was not expressed in these
tissues. The relative mRNA levels of AKR1C1, 2 and 5�RDT-type IIwere similar in amnion, chorion and decidua (Figure).CONCLUSION: AKR1C2, AKR1C3 and 5�RDT-II were expressed in theamnion, chorion and decidua of normal term pregnancies. This mayimply that a local progesterone withdrawal facilitates removal of pro-gesterone action in these tissues facilitating PG production at term.Future studies examining progesterone metabolism via these path-ways and expression of these enzymes in non-laboring vs. laboringmembranes may provide another avenue of local progesterone with-drawal in the final common parturition pathway.
499 Use of cervical pessary for prevention of preterm birthin the short cervix population: a cost-effectiveness analysisJessica Page1, Allison Allen1, Jenna Emerson1,Jessica Fowler1, Jonathan Snowden1, Leonardo Pereira1,Alison Cahill2, Aaron Caughey1
1Oregon Health & Science University, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Portland,OR, 2Washington University in St. Louis, Obstetrics & Gynecology, St. Louis,MOOBJECTIVE: Cervical length (CL) less than 25mm is associated with anincreased risk of preterm birth. A recent RCT by Goya, et al. showed asignificant decrease in the risk of preterm birth with the use of a cer-vical pessary in women with CL�25mm. We sought to investigate thecost-effectiveness of the pessary as an intervention to prevent pretermbirth.STUDY DESIGN: A decision-analytic model was built using TreeAgesoftware comparing cervical pessary to expectant management in theshort cervix (�25mm) population. The baseline risk of preterm birthwas adjusted to reflect the increased risk associated with a short cervix.The Cervical Pessary in Pregnancy Women with a Short Cervix(PECEP) RCT was used to estimate the relative risk of preterm deliv-ery with pessary. Costs of pessary use, neonatal care and cerebral palsywere derived from the literature. Outcomes included preterm birth,cerebral palsy and neonatal death. Cost-effectiveness was set at athreshold of $100,000/QALY.RESULTS: The pessary was found to be a dominant intervention (i.e.costs less with better outcomes). The costs were $8437 less in thepessary group ($7709.20 vs. $16146.66). Overall, treatment with pes-sary resulted in fewer preterm births and improved neonatal out-comes with NNT of 4 women to prevent one preterm birth. The in-tervention was cost-effective at more than 10 times the estimated costof the pessary up to $13,992 per pessary. In univariate sensitivity anal-ysis, the pessary intervention remained cost-effective down to a riskreduction of as little as 8% (e.g. RR of 0.92) in the risk of preterm birth.CONCLUSION: The cervical pessary is a cost-effective and relativelynon-invasive intervention for the prevention of preterm birth in theshort cervix population defined by a CL�25mm. Given the high riskof preterm birth in this group and relatively few available treatments,this represents a promising intervention warranting further study andcharacterization.
Outcomes and costs: treat all vs testnone for uncertain PPROM
In a theoretical cohort of 10,000 patients
www.AJOG.org Doppler Assess, Fetus, Prematurity, U/S, Med-Surg-Diseases Poster Session III
Supplement to JANUARY 2013 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology S215