ttbar τ + jets : Update on QCD Estimation

Post on 04-Feb-2016

25 views 0 download

description

ttbar  τ + jets : Update on QCD Estimation. William Edson SUNY at Albany. Linearity Test to All Values. Slope: 1.11206 ± 0.00197307y-intercept : - 0.110109 ± 0.00111031 Chi2: 21.0176 NDF : 8998. Linearity Test to Means. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of ttbar τ + jets : Update on QCD Estimation

ttbar τ + jets:Update on QCD Estimation

William EdsonSUNY at Albany

Linearity Test to All Values

Slope: 1.11206 ± 0.00197307 y-intercept: -0.110109 ± 0.00111031Chi2: 21.0176 NDF: 8998

Linearity Test to Means

Slope: 1.10837 ± 0.00203573 y-intercept: -0.106914 ± 0.00128895Chi2: 134.465 NDF: 7

Ensemble Results Table

Input Fraction Mean Output Fraction

Difference

0.1 -0.000488063 0.100488063

0.2 0.107330 0.092670

0.3 0.221446 0.078554

0.4 0.335789 0.064211

0.5 0.453984 0.046016

0.6 0.565406 0.034594

0.7 0.673945 0.026055

0.8 0.777001 0.022999

0.9 0.883528 0.016472

Only MET and Dijet Mass Fit Selection

Results for Fit: Signal Fraction:

0.639599±0.0435993 Chi2: 28.0518 Meas. Used: 32 σ: 157.735±10.7522

Ensemble Results: Mean:

0.610350±0.00123522

chi2: 5.81292 NDF: 7

Input Fraction 0.639599

Only MET and Dijet Mass Fit Selection

Results for Fit: Signal Fraction:

0.623387±0.0391393 Chi2: 26.7843 Meas. Used: 32 σ: 160.198±10.058

Ensemble Results: Mean:

0.591959±0.00103681

chi2: 7.08608 NDF: 7

MT Signal vs Control vs MC Backgrounds

Samples Normalized to Own Integrals

Samples Normalized to Sum of Integrals

Back-up

MT Signal vs Control vs MC Backgrounds

Samples Normalized to Own Integrals

Samples Normalized to Sum of Integrals

Histograms Used in Fit Comparisons

MET

Dijet Mass

Histograms Used in Fit ComparisonsHighest pT bjet Reconstruction

2nd Highest pT bjet ReconstructionThe other background histograms titled incorrectly due to error in the analysis code, has been corrected.

New Fits for Ensemble Tests

Cutflow C0: GRL C1: Trigger C2: Primary vertex with ntracks > 4 C3: Electron/muon overlap, larVeto C4: Jet cleaning C5: Lepton Veto C6: tau n ≥ 1 C7: njets >= 4 with eta < 2.5 and |jvf| > 0.75 C8: MET > 60GeV C9: MT < 80GeV C10: >= 1 bjet

C11: Trigger matched tau n ≥ 1 and pT >= 40GeV C12: MC tau object match

Chi-squared minimization

Equation:

N(x): total number of events of type x for distribution n(x)i: number of events in bin of type x frac(Sig): fraction of N(Remain) expected to be Signal binfrac(x)i: fraction of events in bin of type x expected

from MC or template σi: uncertainty in bin i

2

i

iiii2

σ

)n(OB)D)binfrac(QC*N(Remain)*frac(QCD)g)binfrac(si*N(Remain)*(frac(Sig)n(Data)χ

N(OB) - N(Data) N(Remain)

frac(Sig) - 1 frac(QCD)

Chi-squared minimization cont.

σi determined using factors for: bin error:

data signal, MC QCD template other backgrounds, MC

statistical error: data: signal region other backgrounds, MC signal, MC QCD template (uncertainty of background region

data and all MC background region carried through via default SumW2

Highest pT bjet reconstruction

Results for plot: chi-square: 18.798 p-value: 0.4044 ndf: 18 chi/ndf: 1.044

2nd Highest pT bjet reconstruction

Results for plot: chi-square: 20.82 p-value: 0.2346 ndf: 17 chi/ndf: 1.225

Dijet Mass reconstruction

Results for plot: chi-square: 12.06 p-value: 0.8829 ndf: 19 chi/ndf: 0.6347

Closest pT bjet reconstruction

Results for plot: chi-square: 8.373 p-value: 0.93697 ndf: 16 chi/ndf: 0.5233

New Event Selection Verification

Cut Sig Evts

Fakes Sig Eff. Fake Ratio

Rej Fact.

Sig/sqrt(Bkg

d)

Sig/Sqrt(Sig

+Bkgd)

C5Lep Veto

9137 7180594

- - - 3.410 3.408

C6ntaus >

0

9137 1304359

1 0.1817 0.007004

8.000 7.974

C7njets

5051 365445 0.5528 0.2802 0.02500 8.355 8.298

C8MET

4104 36622 0.8125 0.1002 0.1379 21.45 20.34

C9MT

2995 18708 0.7298 0.5108 0.2194 21.90 20.33

C10bjet

2604 4159 0.8694 0.2223 0.7201 40.38 31.66

C12Trig

match

1480 536 0.5684 0.1289 4.858 63.93 32.96

Linear Fit To Mean Values

y(0): 0.0121648±0.00477388 slope: 0.927763±0.00910238chi2: 7.63631 NDF: 7

Linear Fit To All Fractions

y(0): 0.00762894±0.00158121 slope: 0.935856±0.00280988chi2: 42.6259 NDF: 8998

MT Plots

Function Fits of QCD Templates

Mean: 171.283 ± 5.986

Proceeding Acceptance and Efficiency Work

Efficiency: Limiting to events in 105200 sample satisfying: contain truth matched taus single prong muonVeto and eleBDTMedium == 0 calo-seeded taus

Acceptance: Using all MC types Nrec: MC events passing entire cutflow Ngen: 105200 events using mc and trueTau branch

information matched to single prong, BDTJetScore > 0.7 taus

start

pass

N

NEff

gen

rec

N

NAcc