Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

Post on 18-Jan-2016

19 views 0 download

description

Assignment of propulsion system lecturer about analysis of turbofan engines

Transcript of Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

PARAMETRIC CYCLE ANALYSIS OF TURBOFAN ENGINES

PROPULSI PESAWAT TERBANG

AE 3212

AGUSTINUS DIMAS 13608039

FAKULTAS TEKNIK MESIN DAN DIRGANTARA

JURUSAN AERONOTIKA & ASTRONOTIKA

INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG

2011

INPUTS : M0, T0, γ, CP, hPR, Tt4, πc, πf, α

OUTPUTS : F/ṁ0, f, S, ηT, ηP, ηO, FR

EQUATIONS :

R= γ−1γ

Cp

a0=√γR gc T 0

τ r=1+γ−12

M 02

τ λ=T t 4

T 0

τ c=( πc )(γ−1)

γ

τ f=( π f )( γ−1 )

γ

V 9

a0=√ 2

γ−1 {τ λ−τ r [τc−1+α (τ f−1 ) ]−τ λ

τ r τ c}

V 19

a0=√ 2

γ−1( τ λ τ f −1 )

Specific Thrust

Fm0

=a0gc

11+α [ V 9

a0−M 0+α(V 19

a0−M 0)]

Fuel/air Ratio

f =Cp T 0

hPR(τ λ−τ r τ c )

Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption

S= f

(1+α )( Fm0

)Thermal Efficiency

ηT=1−1

τ r τ c

Propulsive Efficiency

ηP=2M 0

V 9

a0−M 0+α(V 19

a0−M 0)

V 92

a02−M 0

2+α(V 192

a02 −M 0

2)Overall Efficiency

ηo=ηT ηP

Thrust Ratio

FR=

V 9

a0−M 0

V 19

a0−M 0

0 5 10 15 20 25 30100

200

300

400

500

600

700

specific thrust

0.511.52345812

πc

F/ṁ0

[N/(k

g/se

c)]

Gambar 1 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for πf =2 and M0=0.9: specific thrust

0 5 10 15 20 25 3012

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

thrust specific fuel consumption

0.511.52345812

πc

S[mg/

(N.se

c)]

Gambar 2 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for πf =2 and M0=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption

0 5 10 15 20 25 300.022

0.024

0.026

0.028

0.030

0.032

fuel/air ratio

f

πc

f

Gambar 3 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for πf =2 and M0=0.9: fuel/air ratio

0 5 10 15 20 25 3020

30

40

50

60

70

thermal efficiency

ηT

πc

ηT

Gambar 4 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for πf =2 and M0=0.9: thermal efficiency

0 5 10 15 20 25 3020

30

40

50

60

70

80

propulsive and overall efficiencies

0.5 11.5 23 45 812 0.51 1.52 34 58 12

πc

ηP(%)η0

Gambar 5 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for πf =2 and M0=0.9: propulsive and overall efficiencies

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

1

2

3

4

5

6

specific thrust

0.511.52345812

πc

FR

Gambar 6 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for πf =2 and M0=0.9: thrust ratio

0 5 10 15 20 25 30160.00

180.00

200.00

220.00

240.00

260.00

280.00

300.00

specific thrust

1.21.5233.544.5

πc

F/ṁ0

[N/(k

g/se

c)]

Gambar 7 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for α=5 and M0=0.9: specific thrust

0 5 10 15 20 25 3012

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

thrust specific fuel consumption

1.21.5233.544.5

πc

S[mg/

(N.se

c)]

Gambar 8 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for α=5 and M0=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption

0 5 10 15 20 25 3045

50

55

60

65

70

75

propulsive efficiency

1.5233.544.5

πc

ηP(%)

Gambar 9 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for α=5 and M0=0.9: propulsive efficiency

0 5 10 15 20 25 3015

20

25

30

35

40

45

overall efficiency

1.21.5233.544.5

πc

η0(%)

Gambar 10 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for α=5 and M0=0.9: overall efficiency

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

2

4

6

8

10

thrust ratio

1.21.5233.544.5

πc

FR

Gambar 11 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for α=5 and M0=0.9: thrust ratio

1 2 3 4 5 650

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

specific thrust

3456781012

πc

F/ṁ0

[N/(k

g/se

c)]

Gambar 12 Ideal turbofan performance versus πf, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: specific thrust

1 2 3 4 5 610

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

thrust specific fuel consumption

3456781012

πc

S[mg/

(N.se

c)]

Gambar 13 Ideal turbofan performance versus πf, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption

1 2 3 4 5 640

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

propulsive efficiency

3456781012

πc

ηP(%)

Gambar 14 Ideal turbofan performance versus πf, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: propulsive efficiency

1 2 3 4 5 60

1

2

3

4

5

thrust ratio

3456781012

πc

FR

Gambar 15 Ideal turbofan performance versus πf, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: thrust ratio

0 2 4 6 8 10 12100.00

200.00

300.00

400.00

500.00

600.00

specific thrust

1.522.533.544.5

πc

F/ṁ0

[N/(k

g/se

c)]

Gambar 16 Ideal turbofan performance versus α, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: specific thrust

0 2 4 6 8 10 1212.00

14.00

16.00

18.00

20.00

22.00

thrust specific fuel consumption

1.522.533.544.5

πc

S[mg/

(N.se

c)]

Gambar 17 Ideal turbofan performance versus α, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption

0 2 4 6 8 10 1230

40

50

60

70

80

propulsive efficiency

1.522.533.544.5

πc

ηP(%)

Gambar 18 Ideal turbofan performance versus α, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: propulsive efficiency

0 2 4 6 8 10 120

1

2

3

4

5

thrust ratio

1.522.533.544.5

πc

FR

Gambar 19 Ideal turbofan performance versus α, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: thrust ratio

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30.00

100.00

200.00

300.00

400.00

500.00

600.00

700.00

800.00

specific thrust

0.5125810

M0

F/ṁ0

[N/(k

g/se

c)]

Gambar 20 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =2: specific thrust

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 35.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

thrust specific fuel consumption

0.5125810

M0

S[mg/

(N.se

c)]

Gambar 21 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =2: thrust specific fuel consumption

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

20

40

60

80

100

propulsive efficiencies

0.5125810ηT

M0

ηP(%)

Gambar 22 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =2: propulsive efficiency

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

overall efficiency

0.5125810

M0

η0(%)

Gambar 23 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =2: overall efficiency

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

1

2

3

4

5

6

thrust ratio

0.5125810

M0

FR

Gambar 24 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =2: thrust ratio

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30.00

200.00

400.00

600.00

800.00

1000.00

1200.00

specific thrust

00.20.5125

M0

F/ṁ0

[N/(k

g/se

c)]

Gambar 25 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =3: specific thrust

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 35.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

thrust specific fuel consumption

00.20.5125

M0

S[mg/

(N.se

c)]

Gambar 26 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =3: thrust specific fuel consumption

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

20

40

60

80

100

propulsive efficiencies

00.20.5125ηT

M0

ηP(%)

Gambar 27 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =3: propulsive efficiency

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

overall efficiency

00.20.5125

M0

η0(%)

Gambar 28 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =3: overall efficiency

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

thrust ratio

00.20.5125

M0

FR

Gambar 29 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =3: thrust ratio