Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

36
Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009

Transcript of Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Page 1: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Tide EnergyTechnologies

San Jose State University

FX RongèreApril 2009

Page 2: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Tidal Dams

Page 3: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Tidal Dam

The dam creates a difference of potential energy between the tide pond and the open sea

Δz

).( AAAA

AA

AA

AOpen

khmWQdt

dE

Page 4: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Power Generation

121212.

kkhhmW

T

dTCds

dPdTCdh

dTCdu

.

.1

.

.

0

0

.

2

1

12

k

k

TT

gz

P Incompressible fluid:

For the chosen control volume, the system is in steady state, then:

Page 5: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

12. zzgmW

z1

z2

m

Power Generation

0000 ...1

....1

zgPzgzzgPzzh

Page 6: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Power Generation

mdt

dzA

And

zzifzzg

Am

zzifzzg

Am

Then

vAW

tRztz

zzgmW

pool

T

T

T

m

1

2112

2121

3

2

12

..

.2..

.2..

2...

..2cos.2

.

.

With:

τ : tidal period

η : Turbine conversion rate

AT: Area of the turbine

R : Range of the tide

Apool: Area of the tidal pool

)()(.)()(..2. 21211 tztzsigntztz

g

A

A

dt

dz

pool

T

Page 7: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Basin Management

To optimize power generation the flow gates are kept closed some time after high and low tides Tide and Basin Management

La Rance

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 4 8 12 16 20 24

Time (hour)

Wat

er lev

el (m

) Po

wer

(M

W)

Sea Level

Basin Level

Power

Page 8: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

La Rance Tidal Power Plant

Tide mean range: 8.4m Tide basin area: 22 km2

10 m9 m8 m7m6m5m4m3m

Page 9: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

La Rance Tidal Power Plant

24 Units of 10 MW each built between 1961 and 1967

700 m dam 480 GWh/y CF=23%

Page 10: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

The Severn Barrage (UK) Capacity: 8,640 MW, 17 TWh, CF= 23%,

Length=15.9 km

Page 11: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

In the Bristol Channel Range 8.2 m, Basin Area: 480 km2

The Severn Barrage (UK)

Page 12: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Economics

Severn Barrage costsMM MM

Civil Engineering 4,900£ 9,800$ Power Generation 2,400£ 4,800$ Power Control 380£ 760$ Management 300£ 600$ Land sea defences 30£ 60$ Effluent Discharge 80£ 160$

Total 8,090£ 16,180$ Additional cost (Grid) 1,230£ 2,460$

Total investment cost 9,320£ 18,640$ Annual Maintenance cost 70£ 140$ Generation 17 TWhAnnual Revenues ($60/MWh) 595£ 1,190$ Simple Payback Period 15 years

The Severn Barrage (UK)

Page 13: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Current Turbines

Page 14: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Power Curve

Similar to a wind turbine

Source: Source: George Hagerman Tidal Stream Energy in the Bay of Fundy, Energy Research & Development Forum 2006Antigonish, Nova Scotia 25 May 2006

Page 15: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Generation prediction Combining Power curves and current data,

we can calculate the generated power

Page 16: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Turbine main components

Rotor• Extracts power from flow• Turns at low RPM 10-30

rpm• Conversion rate varies

with flow velocity (45% max)

Gearbox• Increase rotational speed

of shaft from turbine• 80-95% efficient

Foundation• Secure turbine to seabed• Resist drag on support

structure and thrust on rotor

Generator and Power Conditioning• Generate electricity• Condition electricity

for grid interconnection

• Turns at high RPM• 95-98% efficient

Source: Brian Polagye Tidal In-Stream Energy Overview March 6, 2007

General concept is similar to wind turbines

Page 17: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Turbines

2...

3vAW TT

η is the conversion rate of the turbine, typically 25% to 35%

300 kW, 6 m prototype developed by Marine Current Technologies in operation in the Bristol Channel since 2003

1 MW, 20m twin rotor prototype currently developed by Marine Current Technologies installed in Northern Ireland’s Strangford Lough (2008)

Marine Current Technologies

Page 18: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Strangford Lough project

Strangford Lough project

Installed in April 2008

Page 19: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Turbines

Verdant Power

35 kW, 5m Diameter turbine developed by Verdant. Prototype installed in New York at Roosevelt Island (2006 2008). Project of 175 kW

Page 20: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Results

7,000 hours of operationElectricity generationRotor damageNo fish collision

Page 21: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Turbines

Lunar Energy2 MW, 21m 7 blade rotor prototype currently in development

Gravity Foundation: concrete slab

Power augmentation by convergent-divergent ducting to increase conversion rate

Promising since 2

...3v

AW TT

On the 11th March 2008 Lunar Energy signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Hyundai Samho Heavy Industries (HSHI) and Korean Midland Power (KOMIPO) to develop the 1MW RTT unit for deployment into Korean coastal waters

Page 22: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Turbines

Clean Current Pile Mounted 4 bladed, 14 m, 1 MW A 65 kW prototype has

been Tested at Race Rocks from Sep 2006 to May 2007

Race Rock is a marine reserve run by Lester B.Pearson College on Vancouver Island (Canada)

Page 23: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Clean Current Turbine

Page 24: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Turbines

Open Hydro Open Center

Rotor Diameter 15 m rated at 1.5 MW

Operating Conditions: Current speed > 0.7 m/s Prototype under test at European Marine Energy Center (UK) – Dec. 2006

April 2009: Contract with Snohomish County Public Utility District (SnoPUD), to develop a tidal energy project in the Admiralty Inlet region of the Puget Sound

Page 25: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Turbines

Gorlov Different mounting

Prototype has been tested at Uldomok Strait in Korea in 2002

1 m diameter and 2.5 m high 1.5 kW

Page 26: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Turbines

Enemar KoboldMoored – surface mounted3 vertical articulating blades vertical: 5.0 m diameter: 6 m chord: 0.4 m25 kW @ 2.0 m/sPrototype has been deployed in Straits of Messina 4 years operational experience

Page 27: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Turbines

Barry Davis’ vertical axis turbine

Source: http://www.bluenergy.com/technology.html

Page 28: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Turbines

Blue Energy Project

Philippine Dalupiri 2200 MW Blue Energy Project

Page 29: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Turbines

The Energy Business Limited

Page 30: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Foundation TechnologiesMonopile

• Small footprint• Established technology

used in offshore wind

Gravity Base

Chain Anchors

Tension Leg

Hollow steel pile driven or drilled into seabed

Pros:

• High cost in deep water• Installation expensive

for some types of seabed

Cons:

Heavy foundation of concrete and low cost aggregate placed on seabed

• Deep water installation feasible

Pros:

• Large footprint• Scour problems for some

types of seabed• Decommissioning

problems

Cons:

• Small footprint• Deep water

installation feasible

Chains anchored to seabed and turbine

Pros:

• Problematic in practice• Device must have high

natural buoyancy

Cons:

Submerged platform held in place by anchored cables under high tension

• Small footprint• Deep water

installation feasible

Pros:

• Immature technology now being considered for offshore wind in deep water

Cons:

(10-40m)

Source: Brian Polagye Tidal In-Stream Energy Overview March 6, 2007

Page 31: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Projects Worldwide

Page 32: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Gulf Stream Current

Page 33: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Gulf Stream Current

Page 34: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Florida Current Resource

Page 35: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Florida Current Resource

2..

3vAW Max

1.9 2.4 2.8 3.1Current speed (knots)

Page 36: Tide Energy Technologies San Jose State University FX Rongère April 2009.

Companies to follow Blue Energy Canada Clean Current Technology Marine Current Turbines GCK (Gorlov) Lunar Energy Open Hydro Enemar Kobold Verdant Power Seapower Tidal Electric Aquantis

Annapolis Tidal Generating Station (USA)