The Future of Electronics: Post-Silicon Logic and Memory

33
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center © 2006 IBM Corporation The Future of Electronics: The Future of Electronics: Post Post- Silicon Logic and Memory Silicon Logic and Memory Thomas N. Theis, Director, Physical Sciences, IBM Research

Transcript of The Future of Electronics: Post-Silicon Logic and Memory

IBM T. J. Watson Research Center

© 2006 IBM Corporation

The Future of Electronics:The Future of Electronics:PostPost--Silicon Logic and MemorySilicon Logic and Memory

Thomas N. Theis, Director, Physical Sciences, IBM Research

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation2T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Can we extend the IT revolution?

Organic Electronics?Moletronics? Spintronics?Plasmonics?

Quantum Computing?…?

principle features specified to: i1mm

i10 λmi100 nm

Information technology has progressed through continuous miniaturization and repeated invention of new devices to store, process, and communicate information.The transistor and other devices are now approaching hard physical limits.

What’s Next?

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation3T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

$1000 buys...

1.E-06

1.E-03

1.E+00

1.E+03

1.E+06

1.E+09

1.E+12

1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Year

Co

mp

uta

tion

s/se

c

MechanicalElectro-mechanicalVacuum tubeDiscrete transistorIntegrated circuit

Result: Ever-Decreasing Costs of Computation, Ever-Expanding Applications of Information Technology

After R. Kurzweil, 1999

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation4T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Needed: New Devices Based on New Materials and New Physics.

Carbon nanotubes

Semiconductor nanowires

Chalcogenides

New (smaller, cheaper, faster) devices

Polymers

Complex Oxides

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation5T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

§ The extension of silicon CMOS technology

§ The search for the “ultimate” FET

§ “Beyond the FET”: the Nanoelectronics Research Initiative

§ A Personal Outlook:prospects for adiabatic switching and reversible logic

Topics

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation6T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

The silicon transistor in manufacturing …

35 nmGate Length

90 nm technology generation

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation7T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

… and in the lab.

TSi=7nm Lgate=6nm

Source Drain

Gate

B. Doris et al., IEDM , 2002

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation8T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Still, we are approaching some limits.

E. Nowak, IBM J. R&D, (2002).

0.01 0.1 110

-5

10-3

10-1

101

103

pow

er (

W/c

m2 )

Active Power

Passive

Power

gate length (µm)

Po

wer

Den

sity

(W

/cm

2 )

Air-cooling becomes expensive

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation9T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

The Problem with Passive Power Dissipation:The Inability to Scale Atoms

§ Direct tunneling through the gate insulator will be the dominant cause of static power dissipation.

§ Single atom defects can cause local leakage currents 10 – 100x higher than the average current, impacting reliability and generating unwanted variation between devices.

Field effect transistor

Source Drain

Gate

1.2 nm oxynitride

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation10T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Voltage-scaling regime

Insulator thickness and gate voltage no longer scaling

1.E-01

1.E+00

1.E+01

1.E+02

0.010.1110

Gate Length (um)

Sw

itch

ing

En

erg

y (f

J)

Switching energy is declining at a slower rate.

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation11T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

10S Tox=11A

High-k/Metal Gate Stack

90nm Gate Dielectric:Tinv = 19AToxGL = 11A

High-k/Metal Gate Stack:Tinv = 14.5AToxGL = 16A

90nm SiON = 1.1 nm

The Work-Around: High-k Insulator / Metal Gate Stack

Oxide interlayer

High-k material

Metal gate electrode

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation12T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Innovation Will Continue:Transistor Roadmap Options

2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2020

37 nm 25 nm 18 nm 13 nm 9 nm 6 nm Physical Gate

back-gate

channel

isolation

buried oxide

channel

top-gate

Double-Gate CMOS

Source Drain

Gate

depletion layer

isolation

buried oxidehalo

raised source/drain

Silicon Substrate

doped channel

High k gate dielectric FinFET

Strained Si, Ge, SiGe

isolation

buried oxide

Silicon Substrate

Ultrathin SOI

In general, growing power dissipation and increasing process variability will be addressed by introduction of new materials and device structures, and by design innovations in circuits

and system architecture.

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation13T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

SLm-1

SLm+1

SLm

WLn-1

WLn+1

WLn

Memory may be easier to shrink than logic.

§ Everyone is looking for a dense (cheap) cross-point memory.§ It is relatively easy to identify materials that show bistable hysteretic

behavior (easily distinguishable, stable on/off states).

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation14T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Some Classes of Novel Memory Devices Under Development by Commercial Entities

§ Extensions of Silicon Nonvolatile (Flash) Memory § Magnetic Tunnel Junctions (MRAM)§ Chalcogenide Phase Change Materials (PCM) § Ferroelectric Polymers § Hysteretic Conduction in Complex Metal Oxides§ Solid-State Electrochemical Systems§ (Nano) Electro-Mechanical Systems§ and more …

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation15T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Example: 16Mbit IBM MRAM Demonstration

• 4 active bits / block

• Good power supplydistribution

• Write currentstrimmed by block

Pads / peripheral circuits

Redundancy control &Write current trimming

Pads / peripheral circuits

8Mbunit

4 active 128Kb blocks

8Mbunit

• 4 active bits / block

• Good power supplydistribution

• Write currentstrimmed by block

Pads / peripheral circuits

Redundancy control &Write current trimming

Pads / peripheral circuits

8Mbunit

4 active 128Kb blocks

8Mbunit

Chip image: Cross-section:

MTJ

-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80

2.00

2.20

2.40

Res

ista

nce

(a.u

.)

Field (Oe)

MR

(%)

-2000

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

1995

TMR

(%)

Field (Oe)

Materials Advances

-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 1500

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

TMR

(%)

290K

Field (Oe)Field (Oe)

2005

TMR

(%)

The Emerging Post-CMOS Landscape

© 2006 IBM Corporation16 T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Relative Maturity of Nonvolatile Memory Technologies (2005)

02468

101214161820

ProductSampling

Development Single CellDemo

Charts, NoParts

Tech

nolo

gy C

ham

pion

s (C

ompa

nies

)

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation17T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Post-Silicon CMOS: The Quest for the Ultimate FET

W200nm

Self-Aligned Carbon Nanotube FET: Extension Contacts Based on

Charge-Transfer Chemical Doping

Vertical Transistor Based on Semiconductor Nanowires

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation18T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Vertical Silicon Nanowire FET

1 µm

Al gate

NW + dielectric

Vg Vsd

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation19T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

101

|I d| [

µA

]

-2 -1 0 1 2Vgs [V]

Vds -0.7 V -0.5 V -0.3 V -0.1 V

20

15

10

5

0

|I d| [

µA]

-1.2 -0.8 -0.4 0.0Vds [V]

-1.2 V

-0.8 V

-0.4 V

0 V 0.4 V

Vds = -1.6 V

12

8

4

0

gm

[µS

]

-2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0Vgs [V]

90 K 300 K

Pd Pd

nanotube

Subthreshold Characteristics

Output Characteristics

Temperature dependence

Simple back-gated CNTFET

Intrinsic Performance of Cabon Nanotube FETs

Yu-Ming Lin et al. (IBM), EDL 2005

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation20T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

2m

Tg

gf

Cπ=Cut-off Frequency

260 GHz550 GHz800 GHzfT @ Lg = 65 nm

32 pF/m120 pF/m38 pF/mCg/L

3.5 µS27 µS12.5 µSMaximum gm

12-nm SiO28-nm HfO210-nm SiO2Gate Dielectric

~ 1.1 nm~ 1.7 nm~ 1.8 nmDiameter

Seidel et al. (Infineon)

Javey et al. (Stanford)

Lin et al.(IBM)

Cg : gate capacitance

Intrinsic Switching Speed of CNFETs

Yu-Ming Lin et al. (IBM), EDL 2005

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation21T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Carbon Nanotube FET:Potential for greatly improved turn-on characteristics (low-voltage operation)

J. Appenzeller, Y.-M. Lin, J. Knoch, and Ph. Avouris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 196805 (2004)

Dual-Gate CNTFET

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation22T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Will there be a successor to the FET?

§ Many have written about this subject.

§ An article by George Bourianoff (“The Future of Nanocomputing”,IEEE Computer 36, pp. 44–53) sparked discussions within the Semiconductor Research Corporation regarding the objectives of a new research program – the Nanoelectronics Research Initiative (NRI) – which would stimulate the exploration of devices “beyond the FET”.

à computational state vectors other than electronic charge

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation23T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Beyond Charged-Based Logic?

§ Spin

§ Photons and Plasmons

§ Nanomechanics

§ Biochemistry

p -GaAssubstrate

+

AlGaAs

GaAsquantum wellEF

MgO

A

VT IC

CoFe

Collector

Magnetic Field

e-

Luminescence AlGaAs

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation24T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Nanoelectronics Research Initiative (NRI)§ AMD, Freescale, Micron, TI, IBM, Intelà Joint Industry funding of University Research

§ Promoting both – Invention / Discovery (distributed research, “let many flowers bloom”)

– Proof of Concept (focused university consortia with outstanding facilities)

§ “Extend the historical cost/function reduction, along with increased performance and density … orders of magnitude beyond the limits of CMOS”– Computational State Vectors other than Electronic Charge

– Non-equilibrium Systems

– Novel Energy Transfer Mechanisms

– Nanoscale Thermal Management

– Directed Self-assembly of such structures

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation25T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Nanoelectronics Research Initiative (NRI):Announced Dec. 8, 2005, at Silicon Nanoelectronics and Beyond, by NSF and SRC

§ Institute for Nanolectronics Discovery and Exploration (INDEX)– Lead Institution: College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering at the University of

Albany (SUNY) – MIT, Georgia Institute of Technology, Harvard, RPI, Yale, Purdue– Spintronic and molecular configurational switches

§ Western Institute of Nanoelectronics (WIN)– Lead Institution: UCLA Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science– UCLA, UC Berkeley, UC Santa Barabara, Stanford– Spintronic and plasmonic devices

§ Southwestern Academy of Nanoelectronics (SWAN)– Lead Institution: UT Austin Microelectronics Research Center– Texas A&M, UT Dallas, ASU, Notre Dame, U. of Maryland, Rice U.

§ Supplemental NSF/NRI grants to existing NSF centers

26

NSF/NRI Supplemental Awards: 2005

Nanoferroelectric Random Access Memory

Center for Semiconductor Physics in Nanostructures

MRSECU. Arkansas/ U Oklahoma

Johnson, Matt

Directed Assembly of EpitaxialSemiconductor Nanostructures for Novel Logic Switches

Center for NanoscopicMaterials

MRSECU Virginia (Notre Dame)

Hull, Robert

Development of Next Generation Devices using NanolithographicTechniques

MRSEC at UCSBMRSECUCSB (Stanford, U Mass)

Hawker, Craig

Ultrasmall Nanowire and Oxide Switches

Science of NanoscaleSystems and their Device Applications

NSECHarvard UWestervelt, Robert

Non-equilibrium Quantum Coherent Devices in 1-D materials

Columbia Center for Electronic Transport in Molecular nanostructures

NSECColumbia UYardley, James T.

Exploratory Theory, Modeling, and Simulation for the NRI

Network for Computational Nanotechnology

NCNPurdue ULundstrom, Mark

Title of SupplementCenter NameCenterInstitutionPI

NSF issued new RFP on 8/18/06 for new set of awards

27

Industrial Assignees

Director: Kang Wang

Chief Operating OfficerKos Galatsis

AdminCost Shared CNSI(Katie Christensen)

Program N : *******

Project 1Project 2

…….

WIN Organizational Structure

Equipment & Facilities

Cost Shared CNSI

Executive Committee:• Kang Wang (UCLA)• David Awschalom (UCSB)• Jeff Bokor (UC Berkeley)• James Harris (Philip Wong) (Stanford)• 4 Industrial reps:

• George Bourianoff• Jeff Welser• Sandhu S. Gurtej• Ming-Ren Lin

Program N : *******

Project 1Project 2

…….

Program N : *******

Project 1Project 2

…….

::

THEME A Theme Leader

Project 1Project 2

…….

THEME B Theme Leader

Project 1Project 2

…….

Industrial Program Manager: Youssry

Botros (Intel)

Ajey Jacob (Intel)

28

WIN Research Organization

Speed

Energy

Function

Fan OutReproducibility

Manufacturability

Resonant CouplingSpin Exchange Coupling

Spin Waves

Spin-Electron-Photon Interface Coupling

Spin Hall

Gated Spin Wave

MQCA

Spin Torque

Spin FET

Benchmark and Metrics(Theme 3)

Lead: Jim Allen (UCSB)

Benchmark and Metrics(Theme 3)

Lead: Jim Allen (UCSB)

Spin Devices(Theme 1)

Lead: Vwani Roychowdhury (UCLA)

Spin Circuits(Theme 2)

Lead: Jim Harris (Stanford)

Spin Circuits(Theme 2)

Lead: Jim Harris (Stanford)

29

INDEX Details

u Structurev Headquartered at UAlbany-CNSEv 7 university partners: UA, MIT, GIT, Harvard, Purdue, RPI, Yalev Lead PIs: A. Kaloyeros, D. Antoniadis, and J. Meindlv Work divided into 5 tasks

n Task I: Novel computing State Variable Devicesn Task II: Fabrication and Self-assembly n Task III: Modeling and Architecturen Task IV: Theory and Simulationn Task V: Strategy and Roadmap

u Timelinev Year 1: Emphasis on Tasks I & IIv Year 2: Add Task IIIv Year 3: Add Tasks IV & V

u Managementv Leadership Council with academic and industrial representativesv Technical advisory group from industry

30

INDEX Technical Program and Funding

uResearch Areasv Task I: Novel computing State Variable Devices

n Magnetoresistive devices using magnetic flux quantum as state variable

n Spintronic single electron tansistors based on the RashbaEffect

n Non-volatile logical switches based on the giant planar Hall Effect

n Molecular-mechanical relays using voltage dependent ion channels

n Graphene nanowire switchesn Metal-arene based molecular conformational switches

v Task II: Fabrication and Self-assembly n Focus for the first 3 years is on fabrication techniques for the

Task I devicesn This task is responsible for coordination between the

facilities v Task III: Modeling and Architecture

31

SWAN Team

u Coordinator / Lead PI: Sanjay Banerjee (UT-Austin)

u University of Texas (Austin)v Alan MacDonald, Mathew Gilbert, Frank Register

u University of Texas at Dallasv Bruce Gnade, Moon Kim

u Texas A& M Universityv Jairo Sinova

u Rice Universityv Yehia Massoud, Peter Nordlander, Naomi Halas

u University of Marylandv Sankar DasSarma

u Notre Damev Wolfgang Porod and Gary Bernstein

u Arizona State Universityv John Shumway

u Plan to establish additional relationships with Oak Ridge National Labs, NASA JSC, and potentially other schools / national labs

32

SWAN Tasks and Investigatorsu LEAD PI: Prof. Sanjay Banerjee, UT-Austin

u Task 1: Logic Devices based on new computational state variablesv UT: Banerjee, Gilbert, MacDonald, Register; Maryland: DasSarma,

TAMU: Sinova, ASU: Shumway

u Task 2: Novel materials and structuresv TAMU: Sinova; Notre Dame: Porod, , Bernstein; UT: Gilbert,

Banerjee, Maryland: DasSarma

u Task 3: Directed Self-assembly and nanoscale thermal managementv UT: Gilbert, Register, Banerjee; Maryland: DasSarma

u Task 4: Novel interconnect and architecturesv Rice: Massoud, Nordlander, Halas

u Task 5: Nanoscale Characterizationv UT Dallas: Gnade/Kim

IBM Research

© 2006 IBM Corporation33T.N. Theis to SSSC, October 19, 2006

Conclusions

§ Silicon CMOS logic will be extended at least another 10 years. – New materials and transistor structures

– Cooperative circuit and device technology co-design

§ New non-silicon memory devices are poised to enter the market.

§ The “ultimate FET” may not contain silicon.

§ NRI will promote the search for logic devices “beyond the FET”.

§ Prediction: Research looking “beyond the FET” will converge on – Energy-conserving dynamical systems best suited for

implementation of adiabatic switching and reversible logic.

– Novel circuit architectures designed to allow reliable computation with unreliable devices.