Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

25
Test of a BAC Klystron R. Kowalczyk, B. Weatherford, A. Haase, E. Jongewaard, M. Kemp, and J. Neilson SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory A. Jensen Leidos IVEC 2017 SLAC-PUB-17101 This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515.

Transcript of Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

Page 1: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

Test of a BAC Klystron

R. Kowalczyk, B. Weatherford, A. Haase, E. Jongewaard, M. Kemp, and J. Neilson

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

A. Jensen

Leidos

IVEC 2017

SLAC-PUB-17101

This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515.

Page 2: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

Background – SLAC 5045

• The 5045 klystron is used in the SLAC linac

- ~250 in the accelerator

- Frequency: 2.856 GHz

- RF Power: 65 MW peak, 45 kW avg.

- Nominal efficiency: 45%

- Beam tunnel radius: 1.59 cm

• γa= 0.70

- Over 800 klystrons produced since 1983

- More than 30 million operating hours

• Ongoing effort at SLAC to increase energy

efficiency of RF sources and accelerators

- Reduced cost per kWh

- Sustainability

Page 3: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

3

Existing 5045 Klystron (65MW peak power)

Gun Collector

Gain Cavities Penultimate & Output Cavities

Drift Space

Page 4: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

4

High Efficiency Klystron Design

Conventional

COM

Preliminary cavities are tuned

conventionally for gain

One or more “penultimate” cavities

are tuned high to squeeze the bunch

Most of the circuit sweeps electrons at the

wrong phase into the right phase

Only once most of the electrons are at

the right phase is the bunch compressed

I. Syratchev

I. Guzilov

A. Baikov

Page 5: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

5

High Efficiency Klystron Philosophy

Conventional

COM

One or more “penultimate” cavities

are tuned high to squeeze the bunch

Only once most of the electrons are at

the right phase is the bunch compressed

“core” remains

the same size –

space charge

balances RF field

Peripheral

electrons

brought in

Preliminary cavities are tuned

conventionally for gain

Most of the circuit sweeps electrons at the

wrong phase into the right phase

I. Syratchev

I. Guzilov

A. Baikov

Page 6: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

The Bunch Align Collect Method

COM

BAC

In the BAC (bunch-align-collect), the same

effect is achieved by BAC triplets

B A C B A C B A C

Page 7: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

7

The Bunch Align Collect Method

COM

BAC

B A C B A C B A C

Bunch cavity

kicks all

electrons

toward center

B A C

Align cavity,

tuned low,

defocuses center

Collect cavity, at second

harmonic, primarily

affects the peripherals

In the BAC (bunch-align-collect), the same

effect is achieved by BAC triplets

Page 8: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

8

Overall Goals

• A form, fit, function

replacement for the

5045 with higher

efficiency

• Fit into existing

solenoid

Standard 5045 BAC 5045

Page 9: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

5045 BAC Approach

• Targets: 80 MW peak output power; 55% efficiency

• New design utilizes BAC (Bunch Align Collect) method

Input and three gain cavities remain

nearly unchanged, to simplify retrofit

Modified form of the BAC method used

to bunch beam

Core remains fixed size, periphery

electrons drawn in

B A C C

Page 10: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

Two Dimensional Simulations

• Drift tube diameter reduced in output section so that drift tube is cut off

to second harmonic

• Reduced beam tunnel radius = 1.31 cm (γa = 0.57)

Standard 5045

BAC 5045

• MAGIC2D used for large signal simulations

Page 11: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

11

BAC Simulations

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Har

mo

nic

Cu

rren

t

Position [m]

Fundamental

Second

Third

Page 12: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

Circuit Assembly

Input cavities nearly

identical to standard

Output

Cavity

Modifed circuit:

Page 13: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

13

Test Data

• Pulse length limited to 100 ns to prevent oscillation

• Peak output power of 72 MW, for efficiency of 54%

• Solenoid settings were optimized for stability, not

efficiency (standard 5045 is 45% efficient)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0 200 400 600 800 1000

Po

ut

[MW

]

Pin [W]

54% efficiency

Page 14: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

Oscillations

• Oscillation measured in output waveguide at 6.65 GHz

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

6.40 6.50 6.60 6.70 6.80 6.90

Am

plit

ud

e [

dB

]

Frequency [GHz]

Page 15: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

15

Oscillations

• MAGIC simulations run to longer time show oscillations

Design power Onset of oscillation

Page 16: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

16

Oscillations

• MAGIC simulations showed that there are two potential oscillations:

• Cavities 6, 7, 8 oscillate at 6.7 GHz

• Cavities 2, 3, 4 oscillate at 4.2 GHz

4.2GHz

6.7 GHz

Page 17: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

17

Oscillation Prediction

• Would like a standard method to find oscillation before building klystrons

• Initial plan:

• Use ACE3P, the SLAC parallel electromagnetic code suite

• Solve all cold modes in the circuit structure

• Push particles through each mode, observe energy balance to

determine if mode is stable

Page 18: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

18

6.7 GHz Oscillation

• Drift tube is not cut off at this frequency, so

individual cavities couple together

• Mode trapped between cavities, with transverse

field in tunnel, axial field on gaps

Zero axial E field

on axis (for perfect

alignment, no net

energy transfer (to

zeroth order)) Beam receives

transverse kick

If phasing is right,

off axis beam

transfers energy to

the mode, driving

the oscillation

This is similar to a

conventional monotron

oscillation, and can readily

be found by analyzing for

net energy gain or loss

Page 19: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

19

4.2 GHz Oscillation: Introduction

• Driven by TM11 modes in cavities

• Unlike previous example, drift tube is cut off,

although barely

• Cutoff frequency is 4.4 GHz

• Cavities still couple through cut-off drift tube,

forming a 3-cavity mode

• BUT, mode is stable to the ACE3P analysis

Page 20: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

20

4.2 GHz Oscillation: Explanation

Deep Science Mining for Matter

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.2

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30

I1/I

0

Distance [m]

Nominal

With Bagel

• Measure of harmonic current (measured spatially) shows gain due

to the self-excitation of the 4.2 GHz mode

• Drift tube is cut off, but

barely, so provides

feedback path, with loss

due to exponential decay

• If loop gain exceeds 1,

system will be unstable

• This type of oscillation relies

on forward gain, thus the

assumption of a single

“mode” with constant

amplitude, as in a monotron

type oscillation, is not valid

• Large signal klystron

analysis required to predict

gain

loss

Page 21: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

21

4.2 GHz Oscillation: Explanation

Deep Science Mining for Matter

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.2

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30

I1/I

0

Distance [m]

Nominal

With Bagel

• Measure of harmonic current (measured spatially) shows gain due

to the self-excitation of the 4.2 GHz mode

• Drift tube is cut off, but

barely, so provides

feedback path, with loss

due to exponential decay

• If loop gain exceeds 1,

system will be unstable

• This type of oscillation

relies on forward gain, thus

the assumption of a single

“mode” with constant

amplitude, as in a montron

type oscillation, is invalid

• Large signal klystron

analysis required to predict

gain

loss

Tuning

ring

Beam

axis

Ring added to tune the TM11, not

the TM01, kills gain and oscillation

Page 22: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

Oscillation Prediction

• Need to perform 3D PIC

simulation to be sure of stability

• Compared Vsim and MAGIC in

a model of the first four cavities

• Both predict the 4.2 GHz

oscillation

• On a single core, both run at

similar speed

• Vsim designed to be parallel

• A Vsim test with up to 128 cores

will be performed soon, to

assess scaling

Page 23: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

23

Next Design

• A next iteration of the BAC 5045 is being designed

• Number of cavities have been reduced to 9 from 10

- Increased spacing between cavities reduces likelihood of multicavity oscillation

- Further cavity adjustments with bagels if oscillations seen in MAGIC

• Circuit topology:

- Cavities 1-4 and 9 (output) same as previous version

- Cavities 5-8: Bunch, Collect, Align, Bunch

• Similar performance as first design seen in 1D: 81 MW, 56%

Page 24: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

24

Future Steps

• Finish translation of new 1D design to 2D MAGIC and tweak

design for maximum efficiency

- Address effects of radial beam distribution on efficiency, if

possible

• Screen for oscillations using particle push method and

MAGIC3D

• Finalize mechanical design of new cavities

• Retrofit previously built tube with new BAC cavities

• Begin testing of second iteration

Page 25: Test of a BAC Klystron - slac.stanford.edu

25

Conclusions

• BAC method used to improve efficiency of SLAC 5045

klystron

• Test results confirm that efficiency increases by ten

percentage points

• Oscillation prevented running at design pulse length

• Approach developed to predict oscillation before fabrication

• Second prototype underway to achieve the same efficiency

and eliminate oscillations