Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of...

40
Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University Learning Kennesaw State University April 30, 2008 Σtatistics αt KΣU

Transcript of Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of...

Page 1: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop

Dr. Victor E. KaneLorraine Starks-Gamble

Department of Mathematics and StatisticsAnd the

Center for University Learning

Kennesaw State UniversityApril 30, 2008

Σtatistics αt KΣU

Page 2: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

2

Introduction to Six Sigma – Success Stories

• Six Sigma Improves a work PROCESSES

• Examples : Dummies p.121. GE – Profitted $7 - $10B in 5 yrs.2. Dupont – added $1 - $2.4B in 4 yrs3. Bank of America – saved several

Million by reducing cycle time and number of processing errors.

4. Honeywell – Saved $2B in operating costs.

Page 3: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

What is “Sigma” (Greek σ) ?

1

2

1

2 3 4 5

For example suppose you measure n=10 student wait times (min)for a service:

1( )

1

sigma is a measure of variation

x = 5min, x = 8min, x = 10min, x = 3min, x = 6min

n

i

i

x xn

Page 4: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

4

• Sigma relates to variation – are the observer data exactly the same? Or do they vary?

• Studying a PROCESS requires quantifying the variation of key parameters.

• Gas Station Fill UP – Cycle time, how long does it take?

• Wait time for fast food (or other services)

Page 5: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

For example wait times for service can be measured. Very large or small times are of interest. Why?

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

X

Density

-1.96

0.025

1.96

0.025

0

Distribution PlotNormal, Mean=0, StDev=1

Page 6: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

20100-10-20

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

X

Density

1234567

StDev

Distribution PlotNormal, Mean=0

Big

Means Big Variation

Page 7: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

7

Number Defective Relates to Sigma Level

Sigma Percent Defective Defects Per Million 1 69% 691,462 2 31% 308,538 3 6.7% 66,807 4 0.62% 6,210 5 0.023% 233 6 0.00034% 3.4 target 7 0.0000019% 0.019

Every % Defective Corresponds to a Sigma Level. E.G. 7% Defective is a 3 Sigma Level.

Page 8: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

What is “Sigma” (Greek σ) ?

1

2

1

2 3 4 5

For example suppose you measure n=10 student wait times (min)for a service:

1( )

1

sigma is a measure of variation

x = 5min, x = 8min, x = 10min, x = 3min, x = 6min

n

i

i

x xn

For the wait times 5,8,10, 3,6, 7, 4, 1,8,2 we have = 2.91

Page 9: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

9

• Calculations are usuall done on a computer:

• Variable Mean StDev Minimum

• Data 5.400 2.914 1.000

• Note: one useful fact: 3 sigma interval contains about 99% of the future observations (0. 8.73) Need large samples.

108642Data

Dotplot of Data

Page 10: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

10

• Distplay the data - always!!!

108642Data

Dotplot of Data

Page 11: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

11

• A histogram is useful:

108642

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

Data

Frequency

Histogram of Data

Page 12: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

12

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

ANALYZE: Examine Histograms for Service Wait TimesWhat do each of the Histograms below communicate?

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 110

50

100

150

200

250

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

0

50

100

150

200

250

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

0

50

100

150

200

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Page 13: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

13

Common Themes - DMAIC

• Performance is Defined by Measurements for a Work Process

• Data is the focus of Analysis (Analyze)

• Improvement is conducted by Teams

• Process Control is an outcome

Page 14: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

14

KSU Improvement Projects

1. Conference Planning/Registration – measured response times, satisfaction

2. New Hire Orientation – implemented web site; measured start up problems, satisfaction

Page 15: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

15

KSU Projects con’t

3. Banner Improvement – measured No. days to establish INB Account, Measured satisfaction & No. Days and improved process from 25 days to 9 days (Improved 282%).

4. On-Time Completion Rate Design of Promotionals completion time (improved 40%)

5. Bookstore book adoption time improved from24.92 days to 2.55 days (90% improvement).

Page 16: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

16

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Define – Select a Project to Improve a performance measure

Measure – Define the process and CTQ variables. Sample Process and Customers

Analyze – Evaluate measures, find opportunities for improvement

Improve – Experiment with solutions

Control – monitor results, hold gains

Page 17: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

17

Identify Measure to be Improved (Y variable)Examples: Customer Dissatisfaction Wait Time for Services Cycle Time for Completing an Activity Errors in Processing

Establish Team of Subject Experts

Develop Process Flowchart that Influences Measure Identify Benchmarks for Better Performance

Develop Problem Statement and Goal

DEFINE: The Opportunity for Improvement

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Page 18: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

18

Form a team of process experts Identify key process requirements Identify (preliminary) Critical to Quality (CTQ) customer

requirements. Identify all suppliers and other processes that provide input

into the process. Develop a sequence of normal process steps. For each step note if ERRORS are possible and possible

sources of VARIABILITY. Indicate where Personnel (& how many) are involved in

processing. Define ALTERNATE paths by which work is accomplished.

DEFINE: Preparing a Flowchart

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Page 19: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

19

Six Sigma – DMAIC & Process Mapping

DEFINE: Common Flowchart Symbols

Boundary (Start/End): Identifies the beginning or the end of a process. “Start” or “End” may be written inside.

Operation: Identifies an activity or task in the process which changes an input. Usually the name of the activity is written inside

Delay: Identifies when something must wait.

Inspection: Identifies that the flow has stopped in order to evaluate the quality of the output or to obtain an approval to proceed.

Decision: Identifies a decision or branch point in a process. Write the decision inside. Label each path emerging from a decision block with the options, such as yes, no, or complete, incomplete, etc.

Page 20: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

20

Example of simple flowchart:

Six Sigma – DMAIC Start by Defining Work Process

Value Added Activity

Value Added Activity

StartStart

Supplier Input

Supplier Input

CustomerCustomer StopStop

CTQ Process RequirementsCTQ Process Requirements

Page 21: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

21

Student Submits:• Application• High School Transcripts• Other Required Info

Student Submits:• Application• High School Transcripts• Other Required Info

StudentStudent

CTQ Requirements:1. Answer Received in 1 month2. Correct evaluation of qualifications3. AP Credits granted4. Orientation Scheduled

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Example flowchart of an application process:

Evaluation of Student ApplicationEvaluation of Student Application Reject?Reject?

Reevaluate rejection Criteria

Reevaluate rejection Criteria

Send Rejection

Letter

Send Rejection

Letter

Send Acceptance

Letter

Send Acceptance

Letter N

Y

Page 22: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

22

Start – Enter Station

Pump Available?

N

Y

Drive Up To Open Pump

Get Out of Car

Credit CardAccepted?

N Go To Store to Pay Cash

Y

Remove Cap

Hose Reaches Car?

Reposition Car

N

Y

Select Grade

Start Fill

Return to Pump

Complete Fill?

Wait

Wait For Fill

N

Return Hose

Replace Gas Cap

Exit Station

Possible Variability:• Station Out of Gas• Pumps Inoperable• User Error

Possible Variability:• Card Reader Not Working• Only Cash Accepted

Possible Variability:• Gas Cap on other Side• Kink in Hose

DMAIC: Process Flowchart – Purchase Gas for Car

Y

Page 23: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

23

Start – Enter Station

Pump Available?

N

YDrive Up To Open Pump

Get Out of Car

Credit CardAccepted?

N Go To Store to Pay Cash

Y

Remove Cap

Hose Reaches Car?

Reposition Car

N

Y

Select Grade

Start Fill

Return to Pump

Complete Fill?

Wait

Wait For Fill

N

Return Hose

Replace Gas Cap

Exit Station

CTQ Customer Requirements:

• Station Open When Start or Finish Trip

• Gas Quality Meets Standards• Pumps Functioning• Hose Length Sufficient• Cashiers Trained• Safe Environment

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Page 24: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

24

Value-Added Time

Time to Provide Service to Customer

Example from Admissions: 2 hours to evaluate Acceptance criteria, average of 10 days to get back to student (2/(10x24) = 0.8% efficiency)

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Process Efficiency:

Page 25: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

25

Improve PROCESS SPEED or CYCLE TIME Improve FLOW of Work or Information Between Units Identify and eliminate WASTE – non Valued-Added Activity Reduce or Eliminate INVENTORY Standardize Work Use Team-Based Kaizen Events Use Visual Management Engage in 5S (Sort, Shine, Set in Order, Standardize and

Sustain) Activities

LEAN Concepts that Can Be Used for Six Sigma Projects

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Page 26: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

26

Typical Metrics Used in Six Sigma Projects:

Customer Satisfaction or Dissatisfaction Cycle Time (e.g. to develop a new course) Wait Time for a Service to be Completed Delay Time for an event to occur Process Speed to provide a product or service Throughput – units processed per day Rework or Errors– Do Overs

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Page 27: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

27

Fast Food Metrics – AJC Jan 2007

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Page 28: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

28

Metric

Satisfaction

Cycle Time

Wait Time

Throughput

Do Overs

Application Area

CAPS: Student satisfaction with advising or orientation

UPCC: Time to approve a new course

HR: Time to replace clerical staff

Admissions: Number of students process per day

Registrar: Number of students applying for graduation that don’t qualify

Six Sigma – Example Metrics for Universities

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Page 29: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

29

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

MEASURE: What Data is Needed & How Good are the measurements?

Assemble prior data Start Collection (Flowchart Data Check Points) on key

process measures Assess process variability (e.g. multiple personnel,

duplicate processes) Assess repeatability and accuracy of measurements Outputs, Internal & External Customers Identified Critical to Quality (CTQ) Process Requirements Located in

Work Flow Decide what customer data is needed Develop sampling plan and survey instrument JP

Page 30: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

30

MEASURE: The Major Decisions in Survey Design

1. What should be asked?

2. How will the results be actionable?

3. How should each question be phrased?

4. How should the questionnaire be pre-tested?

5. Does the questionnaire need to be revised?

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Page 31: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

31

Guidelines Solution

Avoid ambiguity Be clear and conciseResponse choices that are

• mutually exclusive• exhaustive• not “double-barrelled”

Avoid complexity Use conversational, familiar language

MEASURE: Key Issues and Solutions

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Page 32: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

32

How comfortable are you with EXCEL?

Do you understand the difference between descriptive and inferential statistics?

Can you construct a freauency chart?

Do you understand the measurements of central tendency and when to apply it?

Do you understand the different classifications of data (nominal, ordinal, ratio)?

Do you understand the normal distribution and why is it important?

Do you play the lottery?

MEASURE: Another Suggested Framework for Survey Development

Is there an improvement before and after a process or change (a pre-post analysis)?

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Page 33: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

33

Determine X variables that may influence Y (Metric to be improved) using C&E Diagrams or FMEA’s

Use statistical summaries of data (X and Y) to look for patterns

Use statistical methods to find which X’s impact Y (e.g. regression)

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

ANALYZE –

Page 34: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

34

ANALYZE: Cause and Effect Diagram

Problem Statement: The Effect

Problem Statement: The Effect

MenMenMachineMachine

MethodsMethods MaterialsMaterials

MeasurementsMeasurements

Team Question: Why is there variability in (5M) that could cause the problem??

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Page 35: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

35

Bookstore Student Concerns

020406080

100

Costly

No Boo

k

Wait

Tim

eBus

y

No Req

Bk

No Help

Friend

lines

s

Concern

Num

ber

Addvising Service Student Complaints.

020406080

100120

Concern

Nu

mb

er

Pareto Principle – 80% of a problem can be explained by 20% of the potential causes (80/20 Rule).

Separate the “Vital Few” from the “Trivial Many.”

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Page 36: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

36

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Often redesign of the process steps in the flowchart can produce improvement. Eliminate complexity.

Identify “Experiments” where process parameters ( X’s) are changed to improve Y (metric being improved).

Find X’s that correlate with Y and then adjust X’s to improve Y

Error Proof Process to make output more consistent Incorporate technology (e.g. bar codes, light beams etc)

where appropriate. Develop on-going process metrics to monitor

performance. Set standards for performance.

IMPROVE– Look at many alternatives

Page 37: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

37

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Use monitoring methods for critical X’s to ensure control of Y’s

Error Proof process inputs Establish in-process control system Use statistical tools such as control charts to monitor

process and customer measures

CONTROL – Hold the gains!

Page 38: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

38

Monitoring Complaint Calls Received per Day. React when more than 9 calls received – Something Changed!

Sample

Sam

ple

Count

191715131197531

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

_C=3.35

UCL=8.841

LCL=0

C Chart of Calls

Six Sigma – DMAIC Improvement Process

Page 39: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

39

Review: General

1. Define your unit’s process – develop a flowchart, identify the CTQs;

2. Measure – what drives customer satisfaction? what is important? Capture time, accuracy of processes;

3. Analyze – how is satisfaction related to importance? How is the process data shaped? Are there significant differences between (among) groups? Are there significant differences pre-post a change?

4. Improve – where are the opportunities for improvement?

5. Control – monitor your improvements. 6. Call the Department of Mathematics and Statistics –

770-423-6327

Page 40: Six Sigma Process Improvement Workshop Dr. Victor E. Kane Lorraine Starks-Gamble Department of Mathematics and Statistics And the Center for University.

Σtatistics αt KΣU

40

References

• Damelio, R. (1996) The Basics of Process Mapping, Productivity Press, N.Y., N.Y.

• George, M., Rowlands, D., Kastle, B. ((2004) What is Lean Six Sigma?, McGraw-Hill, N.Y., N.Y.

• Gygi, C, DeCarlo, N., Williams, B. (2005) Six Sigma for Dummies, Wiley Publishing, Indianapolis, Indiana.

• Kane, V.E. (1989) Defect Prevention, Marcel Dekker, N.Y., N.Y.

• Stamatis, D. (2004) Six Sigma Fundamentals, Productivity Press, N.Y., N.Y.