RQMD vs data for p ± , π ± and K ± at θ lab =97 0 in p+A at E=10.14 GeV
description
Transcript of RQMD vs data for p ± , π ± and K ± at θ lab =97 0 in p+A at E=10.14 GeV
RQMD vs data for p±, π± and K± at θlab=970 in p+A at E=10.14 GeV
Sergey Kiselev, ITEP
• Kinematical limits
• Input info
• RQMD: multiplicities
• RQMD: angle distributions
• Spectra: RQMD vs data
11.04.2008 1ITEP meeting S.Kiselev
Kinematical limits
11.04.2008 2ITEP meeting S.Kiselev
11.04.2008 ITEP meeting S.Kiselev 3
Input info• Data from Yad.Fiz. 57 (1994) 1452
p+A A=Be,Al,Cu,Ta θlab=970 p±, π±, K± tables for f=A-1 E d3σ/d3p vs p absolute normalization error ~ 25%
• RQMD (Relativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics) Phys. Rev. C52 (1995) 3291. RQMD produces hadrons through the excitation of baryonic and mesonic resonances. Heavy resonances (more than 2 GeV for baryons and more than 1 GeV for mesons) are treated in the string picture following the Lund model and all particles are allowed to reinteract (baryon-baryon, baryon-meson, and meson-meson). The model provides a complete time-dependent description of the evolution of each event. The probabilities for excitation of specific channels are governed by experimental cross-sections to the extent possible. The formation points of hadrons are taken from the properties of resonance decay and string fragmentation.
Input info• RQMD min. bias events (b<R=1.1 A1/3)
•Analysis θlab=970 ± 70
f=A-1 E σin ΔN/ (p2 Δ p ΔΩ Nevents with partic.) σin = 2πR2
11.04.2008 ITEP meeting S.Kiselev 4
Be Al Cu TaNumber of RQMD events 1.3 106 4 105 105 105
Part with participants(%) 78 89 94 98
RQMD: multiplicities
11.04.2008 ITEP meeting S.Kiselev 5
p+ π+ π- 102 K+ 103 K- 104 p-
Be 1.8 1.1 0.9 5.1 6.1 1.5
Al 2.9 1.4 1.1 7.0 9.2 1.4
Cu 4.5 1.5 1.4 8.4 10.0 0.7
Ta 8.1 1.6 1.8 11.0 14.0 0.6
average multiplicities
RQMD: angle distributions
11.04.2008 ITEP meeting S.Kiselev 6
Spectra for Be: RQMD vs data
11.04.2008 ITEP meeting S.Kiselev 7
Spectra for Al: RQMD vs data
11.04.2008 ITEP meeting S.Kiselev 8
Spectra for Cu: RQMD vs data
11.04.2008 ITEP meeting S.Kiselev 9
Spectra for Ta: RQMD vs data
11.04.2008 ITEP meeting S.Kiselev 10
Spectra: slopes
11.04.2008 ITEP meeting S.Kiselev 11
fit by ~ exp(-p/p0) in the overlap region
π+ π- p+
Be 70 ± 3 / 65 ± 3 70 ± 3 / 69 ± 2 92 ± 2 / 98 ± 2
Al 80 ± 3 / 71 ± 4 78 ± 3 / 74 ± 4 103 ± 2 / 99 ± 2
Cu 83 ± 4 / 91 ± 8 83 ± 4 / 75 ± 7 103 ± 3 / 107 ± 2
Ta 86 ± 3 / 81 ± 6 83 ± 3 / 83 ± 5 109 ± 2 / 103 ± 2
p0 for data / RQMD
slopes are the same
ConclusionRQMD reasonably reproduces the p+A data at 10 GeV
11.04.2008 ITEP meeting S.Kiselev 12
One can hope the RQMD code can be used for 6 GeV
One can think on optimalset up position to study π0 out of the1+3N kinematicallimit