ρ 0 vector meson elliptic flow (v 2 ) in Au + Au collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV in STAR at RHIC
d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC
description
Transcript of d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 1
d+Au and p+AuCollisions at RHIC
Carl A. GagliardiTexas A&M University
Outline
• Jet quenching and d+Au as the control experiment• Small-x physics and saturation• Upgrade plans for the future
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 2
Hard scattering at RHIC and NLO pQCDPRL 91, 241803
PHENIX π0
Calculations byW. Vogelsang
At 200 GeV, pQCD does a very good job describing mid-rapidity yields
STAR (h++h-)/2BRAHMS (h++h-)/2
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 3
Suppression of high-pT inclusive hadron yields
• Central Au+Au collisions: factor of 4-5 suppression • pT > 5 GeV/c: suppression ~ independent of pT
PRL 91, 172302
Au+Au relative to p+pRAA
Binary scaling
Factor of 4-5
PRL 91, 072301
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 4
Jets and two-particle azimuthal distributions
p+p di-jet
• Trigger: track with pT>4 GeV/c• distribution: 2 GeV/c<pT<pT
trigger
• Normalize to number of triggers
trigger
PRL 90, 082302
At 200 GeV, p+p collisions show conventional di-jet structure expected for 2 2 partonic collisions in pQCD
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 5
Azimuthal distributions in Au+Au
Au+Au peripheral Au+Au central
pedestal and flow subtracted
PRL 90, 082302
Near side: peripheral and central Au+Au similar to p+p
Away side: strong suppression of back-to-back correlations in central Au+Au
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 6
PRL 91, 172302RCP
Theory vs. datapQCD-I: Wang, nucl-th/0305010pQCD-II: Vitev and Gyulassy, PRL 89, 252301Saturation: KLM, Phys Lett B561, 93
pT>5 GeV/c: well described by pQCD+jet quenching, but also by gluon saturation model (up to 60% central)
Final state
Initial state
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 7
Is suppression an initial or final state effect?
Initial state? gluon
saturation
Final state? partonic
energy loss
How to discriminate? Turn off final state d+Au collisions!
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 8
What RHIC found – Jet Quenching
PRL 91, 072304
Pedestal&flow subtracted
Inclusive yields and back-to-back di-hadron correlations are very similar in p+p and d+Au collisions
Both are strongly suppressed in central Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV
STARSTAR
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 9
More Recent Focus – CorrelationsPHENIX, nucl-ex/0507004
STAR Preliminary
dN
2/d
Δφ
1dΔ
φ2/N
trig
φ1=φ1-φtrig
φ2=
φ2-φ
trig
Au+Au 10%
Obtain more detailed information regarding the underlying dynamics.
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 10
Mid-rapidity vs. forward rapidity
MidRapidity
ForwardRapidity
CTEQ6M
Gluon density can’t grow forever.Saturation may set in at forward rapidity when gluons start to overlap.
yT es
px 2
~
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 11
Forward particle production in d+Au collisionsBRAHMS, PRL 93, 242303
Sizable suppression in charged hadron production in d+Au collisions relative to p+p collisions at forward rapidity
BRAHMS
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 12
PHENIX and PHOBOS report similar effectsPRL 94, 082302 PRC 70, 061901(R)
Charged particles are suppressed in the forward direction in d+Au collsions
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 13
ln 1x related to rapidity of
produced hadrons.
As y grows
Expectations for a color glass condensate
D. Kharzeev, hep-ph/0307037
Iancu and Venugopalan, hep-ph/0303204
Are the BRAHMS data evidence for gluon saturation at RHIC energies?
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 14
One calculation within the saturation picture
RdAu
RCP
Saturation model calculation with additional valence quark contribution (Kharzeev, Kovchegov, and Tuchin, PL B599, 23)
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 15
Another recent calculation
Very good description of the pT dependence of the BRAHMS d+Au → h- + X cross section at η = 3.2
(Dumitru, Hayashigaki, and Jalilian-Marian, hep-ph/0506308)
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 16
Pseudo-rapidity yield asymmetry vs pT
Back/front asymmetry in 200 GeV d+Au consistent with general expectations of saturation or coalescence; doesn’t match pQCD prediction.
Au direction / d direction
PRC 70, 064907STARSTAR
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 17
Saturation physics at RHIC?
• Fundamental question regarding saturation – Where does it set in?
• Forward hadron production at RHIC samples similar x values as mid-rapidity production at the LHC– Complex interplay at the LHC– Will probably need p+p, p+Pb, and Pb+Pb – all at the
same √s – to unravel it fully
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 18
x values in saturation calculations
In CGC calculations, the BRAHMS kinematics corresponds to <xg> <~ 0.001 (Dumitru, Hayashigaki, and Jalilian-Marian, hep-ph/0506308)
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 19
Is saturation really the explanation?
Difficult to explain BRAHMS results with standard shadowing, but in NLO pQCD calculations <xg> ~ 0.02 is not that small
(Guzey, Strikman, and Vogelsang, PL B603, 173)
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 20
Comparing d+Au dN/dη to p+emulsion
PHOBOS attributes effects to limiting fragmentation
nucl-ex/0409021
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 21
Many recent descriptions of low-x suppression
Saturation (color glass condensate)● Jalilian-Marian, NPA 748 (2005) 664.● Kharzeev, Kovchegov, and Tuchin, PLB 599 (2004) 23; PRD 68 (2003) 094013.● Armesto, Salgado, and Wiedemann, PRL 94 (2005) 022002.
Multiple scattering● Qiu and Vitev, PRL 93 (2004) 262301; hep-ph/0410218.
Shadowing● R. Vogt, PRC 70 (2004) 064902.● Guzey, Strikman, and Vogelsang, PLB 603 (2004) 173.
Parton recombination● Hwa, Yang, and Fries, PRC 71 (2005) 024902.
Factorization breaking● Kopeliovich, et al., hep-ph/0501260.● Nikolaev and Schaefer, PRD 71 (2005) 014023.
Others?
A short list (probably incomplete)
● ...
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 22
<z>
<xq>
<xg>
NLO pQCD
S. Kretzer
p p 0, 3.8, s 200GeV
Forward π0 production at a hadron collider
• Large rapidity π production (η~4) probes asymmetric partonic collisions
• Mostly high-x quark + low-x gluon
• 0.3 < xq< 0.7
• 0.001< xg < 0.1
• <z> nearly constant and high ~ 0.7-0.8
• A probe of low-x gluons
N
N
q
g
s 2EN
ln(tan(2
))
xq xF / zEN
xqpxgp
xF 2E
s
z E
Eq
xg pT
se g
EN
(collinear approx.)
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 23
Do we understand forward π0 production in p + p?
Bourrely and Soffer, EPJ C36, 371: NLO pQCD calculations underpredict the data at low s from ISR Ratio appears to be a function of angle and √s, in addition to pT
√s=23.3GeV √s=52.8GeV
xF xF
Ed
3 d
p3 [b
/GeV
3 ]
Ed
3 d
p3 [b
/GeV
3 ]
NLO calculations with different
scales:
pT and pT/2
Data-pQCD differences
at pT=1.5GeV
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 24
The error bars are statistical plus point-to-point systematic
Consistent with NLO pQCD calculations at 3.3 < η < 4.0
Data at low pT trend from KKP fragmentation functions toward Kretzer. PHENIX observed similar behavior at mid-rapidity.
p+p +X at 200 GeV
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 25
d+Au +X at 200 GeV
d+Au π0 cross section at η = 4.0 is well described by a LO CGC calculation with a K-factor of 0.8(Dumitru, Hayashigaki, and Jalilian-Marian, hep-ph/0506308)
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 26
dependence of RdAu
pp
dAuR
1972
1dAu
Observe significant rapidity dependence, similar to BRAHMS measurements and expectations from saturation framework.
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 27
Constraining the x-values probed in hadronic scatteringGuzey, Strikman, and Vogelsang, Phys. Lett. B 603, 173
Measure two particles in the final state to constrain the x-values probed
Log
10(x
Glu
on)
Gluon
TPC
Barrel EMC
FTPC FTPC
FPDFPD
For 22 processes
• FPD: || 4.0
• TPC and Barrel EMC: || < 1.0
• Endcap EMC: 1.0 < < 2.0
• FTPC: 2.8 < < 3.8
Collinear partons:
● x+ = pT/s (e+1 + e+2)
● x = pT/s (e1 + e2)
Log10(xGluon)
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 28
PYTHIA (with detector effects) predicts
• “S” grows with <xF> and <pT,>
• “s” decrease with <xF>
and <pT,>
PYTHIA prediction agrees with data
Larger intrinsic kT
required to fit data
Statistical errors only
25<E<35GeV
45<E<55GeV
STAR Preliminary
STARSTAR
FPD-TPC correlations in p+p
STAR Preliminary
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 29
Any difference between p+p and d+Au?
Kharzeev, Levin, McLerran gives physics picture (NPA748, 627)
d+Au: Mono-jet?
PT is balanced by many gluons
Dilute parton system
(deuteron)
Dense gluon
field (Au)
Color glass condensate predicts that the back-to-back correlation from p+p should be suppressed
p+p: Di-jet
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 30
Back-to-back correlations with the color glass
(Kharzeev, Levin, and McLerran, NP A748, 627)
The evolution between the jets makes the correlations disappear.
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 31
25<E<35GeV
35<E<45GeV
HIJING predicts similar effects in d+Au as seen in p+p
Are there “trivial” differences between p+p and d+Au?
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 32
STARSTAR
Statistical errors only
• are suppressed at small <xF> and <pT,>
Spp-SdAu= (9.0 ± 1.5) %
consistent with CGC picture
• are consistent in d+Au and p+p at larger <xF> and <pT,>
as expected by HIJING
25<E<35GeV
35<E<45GeV
Fixed as
E & pT grows
STAR Preliminary
STAR Preliminary
STAR Preliminary
STAR Preliminary
Correlations in d+Au
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 33
STAR Forward Meson Spectrometer upgrade
• FMS increases areal coverage of forward EMC from 0.2 m2 to 4 m2
• Addition of FMS to STAR provides nearly continuous EMC from -1<<+4
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 34
p+p and d+Au ++X correlations with forward
hep-ex/0502040p+p in PYTHIA d+Au in HIJING
Conventional shadowing will change yield, but not coincidence structure.
Sensitive to xg ~ 10-3 in pQCD scenario; few x 10-4 in CGC scenario.
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 35
PHENIX Nosecone Calorimeter upgrade
PHENIX Forward Spectrometer:
Forward Silicon
charged particle tracking
Forward Calorimeter (em and hadronic)
W/Si calorimeter
0.9 < η < 3
energy and position measurements
γ/e/jet trigger
Forward muon system
muon tracking
muon trigger
Same upgrades on South side
NCC
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 36
Detection at forward / backward rapidity with Nosecone Calorimeters -
• Direct detection of neutral pions (0.9 < || <3.0).
• Large acceptance for high pT pions.• High energy photons.• Determines jet direction plus a rough energy measurement.• γ + jet coincidences and detection.
EMhad
Side view Front view
χc
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 37
PHENIX Endcap Silicon Vertex upgrade
Endcaps detect following by displaced vertex of muons:D μ + X B μ + XB J/ + X μ+ μ
IP
μ
B
Secondary vertex resolution ~133 m (endcap)
barrelendcapendcap
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 38
Gluon shadowing and spin structure function with VTX
Extracting gluon structure function– Vertex detector provides broad range in x in the predicted
shadowing region (x <= 10-2) and at larger x– Measure gluon shadowing in p+A versus p+p
GluonShadowingPredictions
coverage
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 39
Double parton correlationsCDF, PRL 79, 584
PRL 88, 031801
A-dependence of 4-jet yields in p+A collisions can be used to measure x1 – x2 momentum correlations within the proton.
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 40
Conclusions
• d+Au collisions have played a key role in understanding the physics of Au+Au collisions
• d+Au results provide hints that saturation effects are becoming important
• Both STAR and PHENIX have upgrade plans that will dramatically improve their forward capabilities
• RHIC may be the ideal accelerator to explore the onset of saturation
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 41
Carl Gagliardi – d+Au and p+Au Collisions at RHIC 42
Nuclear Gluon Density
World data on nuclear DIS constrains nuclear modifications to gluon density only for xgluon > 0.02
e.g., see M. Hirai, S. Kumano, T.-H. Nagai, Phys. Rev. C70 (2004) 044905 and data references therein