Radiation Monitoring - Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro
Transcript of Radiation Monitoring - Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro
2Duke University
Contents
• Introduction• General Aspects• Types of Detectors• Neutron spectrometrywith Bonner spheres• Examples of measured spectra with BS
3Duke University
Introduction
• Goal: Measure/estimate ambient radiation fields generated by accelerators (induced activity - conventional techniques)
• What: Operational (ambient dose equivalent) or physical (Φ(E)) quantities, the latter can be translated to operational quantities using appropriate conversion factors
4Duke University
Introduction
• Purpose 1: Insure radiation safety of workers & public; evaluate and monitor efficacy of specific protection measures; backup information for personnel dose investigations
• Purpose 2: Insure and demonstrate regulatory compliance (keep records!)
5Duke University
Introduction
• Special to accelerators: great variations in type, energy & spatial distribution; time structure (pulsed fields) of prompt radiation
• Radiation fields depend on great number of parameters need to record details: date & time, average current, E, mode of operation, special machine setup, …etc
6Duke University
Sources
• Mostly photons, neutrons and muons• Beam losses, special operation (conditioning),
auxiliary devices (klystrons)• Direct & scattered radiation near sources,
skyshine from far away• Spatial aspects: uniform field or hot spots,
leakage through cracks, ducts and sharp forward sources (brems., muons)
7Duke University
Type of Measurements: Surveys
• Short/simple survey: field possibly known, looking for “ballpark” values or yes/no information - routinely done during normal operations
• Extensive surveys: at startup of new facility, after long shutdown periods or changes in configuration; normal operation and/or mis-steering and accident scenarios
8Duke University
Type: Long-Term Monitoring
• Continuous long-term monitoring, using active (with recording capability) or passivedevices. Recording of sampled or integrated (preferred) signal
• Stationary active monitors may be interlocked as part of safety system
9Duke University
Type: Special Measurements
• Detailed characterization of radiation fields: components, energy spectra, spatial distribution …
• Detailed characterization of detector behavior - requires additional instrumentation
• Complex measurements under special operating conditions (special measures)
10Duke University
General Aspects - Calibration
• S(E) = response function; ks = spectrum weighted response per unit fluence
tots
tot
s
RdEE
dEEESk
dEEkdEEESR
Φ=
Φ
Φ=
Φ=Φ=
∫∫
∫∫Φ
).(
).().(
).().().(43421
11Duke University
Calibration
• Cs = calibration factor for spectrum S, (hφ)s = spectrum weighted average fluence-to-dose equivalent conversion factor
ssss
s
khCRCH
dEEh
dEEEhh
)( .
).(
).().()(
φ
φ
φφ
=⎯→⎯=
Φ=
∫∫
12Duke University
Dead Time
• Dead time τ = difference in pulse arrival times below which two incoming pulses will not be resolved
• May be determined/dominated by intrinsic properties of detector or counting electronics
13Duke University
Dead Timen = true interaction ratem = recorded count rate
= system dead time
τmmn
−=
1Nonparalysable:
Paralysable: τnnem −=needs iterative approach
14Duke University
Dead TimeParalysable: two solutions possible! Solution: change true rateand observe if count rate increases or decreases.
15Duke University
Dead time with pulsed sources
• << T no problem• < T difficult problem
• T < < 1/f -T n = f .ln(f/(f- m)) does not deped on
m
n
16Duke University
Dead time with pulsed sources
• Rule of thumb: OK if count rate is less than a tenth of rep rate - then loss is ~5%
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
measured rate/machine pulse rate
mea
sure
d/re
al c
ount
rat
e
17Duke University
General Aspects - RF and mag. fields
• RF generates signal in anything acting as antena: unshielded or badly shielded cables & components attached to sensitive preamp.
high level of noise (false signal, distorted MCA spectra, …)
• Magnetic field affect moving charge: PMTs and gas detectors especially sensitive
19Duke University
Choice of Instrument & Method
• Adapted to application: en. response, particle type, temperature sensitivity, rf, …
• Care to avoid dead time problems, paralysis, saturation & recombination in intense fields
• Interlocked monitors should be failsafe -use check source or natural bkg, although the latter may pose problems (low rates)
21Duke University
Choice of Instrument & Method
• Unknown fields have to be characterized (energy or LET spectra) and proper calibration factors established
• Take into account directionality of field & detector response
• Take precautions during special (mis-steer, accident simulation) measurements requiring interlock bypass, roping of areas...
22Duke University
Gas Detectors
• GM, IC, PC: primary application in photon survey meters; IC & PC also for neutrons, with propper wall and gas choice
• Problems: pulsed fields, mag. & RF fields• Large ICs: stationary (interlocked) monitors
(BSOIC at SLAC, Chipmunk at Fermilab ..)• ICs operated in current mode impervious to
pulsed fields (except higher recombination)
23Duke University
Gas Detectors
• GMs - bad dead time problem (paralysable)• GMs not suitable for neutrons (equally
sensitive to photons), but …• Albatros: Moderated GM wrapped in silver
- activated by neutrons (saturation within minutes) - no trouble with pulsed fields
• PCs filled with BF3 or 3He used for thermal neutron detection
24Duke University
Special Gas Detectors: TEPC
• Tissue-Equivalent Proportinal Counter: TE walls and TE gas - from PHA one can determine D(y) ~D(LET) average Q
• HANDI used at CERN• Problems in pulsed fields• Not very sensitive (for 1-micron sphere)
25Duke University
Recombination IC
• Takes advantage of dependence of columnar recombination on LET
• I = kVn, where n=f(Q), or• Double chamber method (one at high and
one at low voltage)• Tricky, not widely used around accelerators
(earlier used at CERN and Fermilab)
26Duke University
Proton recoil PC (neutrons)
• Filled with hydrogen or hydrogenous gas, neutrons detected by proton recoils
• Neutron spectrum can be obtained by unfolding recoil proton spectrum
• Problems: sensitivity, pulsed fields• Narrow energy range for given volume and
pressure; 10 keV - few MeV requires use of several detectors in parallel (ROSPEC)
27Duke University
Scintillators
• Used in photon survey meters and monitors• For muons: photon bkg eliminated by
coincidence between two detectors forming a directional telescope (with absorber)
• Organic scintillators used for neutrons (proton recoil); photon bkg can be removed by pulse-shape analysis
29Duke University
Passive Detectors
• Nuclear Emulsions: disappearing art• TLD, OSL and track-etch: photons &
neutrons, mostly for personnel dosimetry, but also area monitoring
• Activation detectors: neutrons• Optichromic and radiochromic detectors:
high level doses (near beamline)
30Duke University
Bubble Detectors
• Superheated droplets suspended in gel• Neutron and gamma• Active or passive• Limited use life• Limited dynamic range
31Duke University
Moderated Neutron Detectors
• With active or passive th. n. detectors• Fast neutrons moderated to thermal
energies detected with greater efficiency, using high x-sections for thermal neutrons (10B, 3He, 6Li)
• Surveys, prolonged monitoring, and spectrometry
32Duke University
Moderated Neutron Detectors
• 5” PE cylinder with Panasonic TLD card used for area monitoring and SLAC and Duke
33Duke University
Rem-Meter• Response ~ Fluence-to-Dose-Equivalent
conversion factor hφ R~H, independent of neutrons energy counts ⇔ rems
10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 1031.0×10-12
1.0×10-11
1.0×10-10
1.0×10-09
E [MeV]
h φ [S
v.cm
2 ]
34Duke University
Extension of E-range
• Energy response of ordinary rem-meter falls off beyond ~10 MeV
• Lead layer: (n,2n), (n,3n), …conversion to neutrons with lower energies (Linus:Birattari et al., 1990)
• Used in astrophysics for decades to detect cosmic ray neutrons (BF3 counters, PE, Pb)
35Duke University
Detection time in moderators
• Moderation, and especially thermal walk take time detection delayed from neutron entry into moderator volume
• Slow neutrons delayed in shielding• This leads to spread of detection time in
pulsed machines (to tens, even hundreds μs) and greatly alleviates dead time problems
39Duke University
Neutron Spectrometry
• Proton recoil - PCs & scintillators - good E resolution, limited energy range, problems in pulsed fields
• Bubbles: dynamic range; statistics; cost• TOF - great resolution; complex, very low
sensitivity (not suitable at RP levels)• Activation threshold detectors: low
sensitivity, laborious readout;
41Duke University
Neutron Spectrometry
• Bonner spheres: set of spherical moderators of different sizes, used with th. n. detector
• Wide energy range, high sensitivity, low E resolution (sufficient for RP)
• Energy response can be further extended by use of (n,xn) in heavy materials (Pb, W)
42Duke University
Spectrometry with BSS
• Principle: measure n count rates, then unfold Φ(E):for i=1, …,m
• Typically m=5-8, n=30-100
• Under-determined system; additional info provided through “1st guess”, smoothing, and other constraints on the spectrum
∑=
Φ=n
gggii SR
1, .
43Duke University
Spectrometry with BSS
• Unfolding codes - same/similar as for spectrometry with activation foils
• BUNKI, LOUHI, SAND2, SWIFT (MC), MAXED, ...
• Most important: well tuned response matrix
44Duke University
Extension of E-range - Pb
10010-8 10-6 10-210-4 102 104
ENERGY [MeV]
SE
NS
ITIV
ITY
[a.u
.]
with leadno lead
1
10-1
10-2
10-3
12"
45Duke University
Extension of E-range - 11C
• 11C activation (threshold ~20 MeV) in 5x5”plastic scintillator (J. B. McCaslin, 1960)
• (n,2n) cross-section added to response matrix
• Saturated activity entered in lieu of sphere count rate
12C(n,2n)11C
00.5
11.5
22.5
3
10 100 1000
E [ MeV]
N. σ
46Duke University
Extension of E-range - 11C
• Typical irradiation time: ~40 min (2.T1/2)
C … net count rate ε … counting efficiency
)e)(1eε.(eC.λA
irrcdd λ.t)tλ(tλ.tsat −+−− −−=
Irradiation tirr td counting tc
48Duke University
Extension of E-range
0.0E+0
5.0E-2
1.0E-1
1.5E-1
2.0E-1
2.5E-1
1.E-1 1.E+0 1.E+1 1.E+2 1.E+3
E [MeV]
Sens
itivi
ty [c
m^2
] 8”
12”
12Pb
C-11
49Duke University
Duke BS System
30.48
PA PortableMCAHV
A
25.420.32
14.2 8 cm
He-3counter
12.7x12.7cmscintillator (C11)
Optimized configuration of lead layer
51Duke University
Response Matrix (Duke system)
0.E+0
1.E-2
2.E-2
3.E-2
4.E-2
5.E-2
6.E-2
7.E-2
8.E-2
9.E-2
1.E-1
1.E-7 1.E-6 1.E-5 1.E-4 1.E-3 1.E-2 1.E-1 1.E+0 1.E+1 1.E+2 1.E+3
E [MeV]
Sens
itivi
ty [a
.u.]
bare
3.15"PE
5.6" PE
5.6"Pb
8" PE
8"Pb
10" PE
10" Pb
12" PE
12" Pb
53Duke University
What to expect ...
• Proton machines:– hadronic “hard” shower– neutrons:
• “rapid” component (> 20 MeV), part of cascade• evaporation neutrons from residual nuclei (~MeV)
– most penetrating part: neutrons >150 MeV (for E>150 MeV σin reaches a constant minimum: σin = 43.1 A0.70 )
54Duke University
What to expect ...
• Electron machines:– Elmag. “soft” shower– photoneutrons from
three production processes
– behind thick shields spectrum determined by high E neutrons
100
10-1
10-2
100 102 103
PHOTON ENERGY [MeV]
Giant Resonance( ,n)γ
Pions
Pseudodeuteron
/A(m
b/N
ucle
on)
σ
Photonuclear Cross Section
55Duke University
What to expect ...
• Common aspect of e and p machines:– thick shields neutrons with E>150 MeV are
the determining factor– “Equilibrium” spectra: High E portion +
products of hadronic cascade emerging from outer shielding layers
56Duke University
Specific Aspects
• Dead time in pulsed fields– SLAC: e- and e+ pulses from 10 ns to 1.6 μs– Moderation & thermal walk save the situation
(neutron signal spread over 100s of μs)• Variable beam intensity, beam interruptions
need a reference monitor ; more of a problem for 11C activation
57Duke University
Non-equilibrium spectra - SLAC SSRL
0 1 m leadconcrete
SPEAR
Faraday cup
dipole magnetFARC
135 90 45ReferenceBF3 counter
58Duke University
SLAC SSRL
• MCA Pulse-height spectra (with γ-flash)
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Channel
Cou
nts
gate offgate on
60Duke University
SLAC SSRL - SPEAR 135º
Energy (MeV)10 -6 10 -3 10 0 10 30
20000
40000
60000
80000Fl
uenc
e/le
thar
gy
with C-11without C-11
61Duke University
SLAC SSRL - SPEAR 90º
10 -6 10 -3 10 0 10 30
100000
200000
300000
Flue
nce/
leth
argy
Energy (MeV)
with C-11without C-11
62Duke University
SLAC SSRL - SPEAR 45º
10 -6 10 -3 10 0 10 30
50000
100000
150000
200000
with C-11without C-11
Flue
nce/
leth
argy
Energy (MeV)
63Duke University
Measured spectra - CERN
E.Φ
(E)
ENERGY [MeV]100 10310-310-6
105
106
107
concreteiron
64Duke University
Measured spectra - CERN
Iron Shielding Concrete Shielding
Φ<20 Φ>20 Φ total Φ<20 Φ>20 Φ totalFLUKA 11.44 0.66 12.10 0.83 0.62 1.45BS 16.51 0.50 17.01 1.08 0.49 1.57Ratio 1.44 0. 78 1.41 1.30 0.79 1.08
(normalized to 1E+6 counts of monitor IC)
• Comparison with FLUKA calculations:
65Duke University
Measured spectra - SLAC FFTB
• Final Focus Test Beam (FFTB)
Beam Dump
Beam Line
2147 GeV e-
Muonshielding
ConcreteIron0 1 2 3 m