QUALITY IN HIGH-TECH PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT … · This fast track is usually unrealistic TAI...
Transcript of QUALITY IN HIGH-TECH PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT … · This fast track is usually unrealistic TAI...
1
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
QUALITY IN HIGH-TECHPRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
(Projects)
Pekka J. Järvinen, HUT TAI Research Centre
theory vs. practice and some lessons learned
2
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Here & Now
Vision
PRACTICAL
ABSTRACT
Beyond theobvious
Y
X
αααα ββββ
γγγγ
αααα1111
δδδδ
ζζζζ
Copyright Paul Lillrank, modified
Researchpart ofproject
Developmentpart ofproject
This fast trackis usually unrealistic
TAIresearcher
WHY THEORY?
3
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
WHAT IS QUALITY
• excellence (personal opinion/taste)
• value (value ~ quality/price)
• conformance to requirements (B2B/B2C)
• fulfilment of expectations (B2B/B2C)
4
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
QUALITY DEFINITION
Deliverables:• product• service• attached informationprocesssystems environment
Transaction
Measurable
S e q u e n c e
Repetition
Step 1 Step 2
R
e
s
u
l
t
Step 3a
Step 3b Step 3c
PROCESSES MAY BE REPETITIVE ORSEQUENTIAL
5
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
MANAGING FOR QUALITY - THE LONG TREND
Ancient times
Innateexcellence,
excellentWalterShewhart
Industrial quality
Conformance tospecificationsin a repetitiveprocess
EdwardsDeming
JosephJuran
Quality management
Implementingquality in largelabor intensiveorganizations
Customer focus
Servicesandinformation
KaoruIshikawa
Non-routIne
Bell Lab’s,AT&T
Toyota etc. Japaneseauto industry
Heavy metal &chemical industries
Travel & tourism,
1950 1970 19901920
error-free affordable customized
Professionalism Quality control (QC) Quality assurance (QA) Quality management (QM)
© Paul Lillrank 2000InfoQ
6
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
© Paul Lillrank 2000InfoQ
THE QUALITY BROOM
Quality culture
Quality system
Management withvisions, values,
and competence
Bureaucracy,Processmanagement
ORGANICORGANICMECHANICAL
Degree ofvariability
STANDARDS ROUTINES CHAOS
(QM environment)
(Variation reductionbetween planned and actual output)
(Mass production environment)
(R&D environment)(‘Nerd’ environment)
7
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
INPUT SETINPUT SETINPUT
Target=
Output
Tolerance ofvariation
Tolerance ofvariety
OUTPUT SET
TARGET
Efficiencycriteria
Effectivenesscriteria
OUTPUT SET
TARGETAchievementcriteria
StandardProcess
RoutineProcess
Non-RoutineProcess
Quality and Process PROJECT
8
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Technical Quality• Artefacts• Variation• Losses from deviations
Strategic Quality• Value proposition (Application)
• Differentiation (Phenomenon)
• Poor trade-off (Downside)
Economic Quality• Deliverables• Variety• Invalid choice
Quality from Business Point-of View
TopMngmnt
MiddleMngmnt
ProcessActors
9
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
(R&D)Project Definition
A project is a sequence of
unique, complex, and connected activitieshaving one goal or purpose and that must becompleted by– specific time
– within budged
– according to specifications.
10
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Project environment
Consultants
Sub-contractors
Suppliers
Projektitiimi
Customers
Korporaatio
ProjektitiimiProject team
Society
Corporation
Shareholders
Consultants
Sub-contractors
Suppliers
ProjektitiimiProjektitiimi
Customers
Korporaatio
ProjektitiimiProject team
Society
Corporation
Shareholders
Data•raw information e.g. reading of measuringequipment, or result of direct observation• connected with observations of states andevents of the world• bound with source of origin• can be communicated through language,numbers, data graphs and means ofcommunication
Information•data refined for a purpose in a context• bound with source of origin• it has meaning, format, utilityconnection and interpretation
Knowledge•comprehension how things arefunctioning, related and influencingeach other•divided into tacit and explicit parts• relating probability to expectedoutcomes• leaves room for utilisation ofanalogy• acts as basis of DOE
11
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Critical Phases of Project
• Offer Request
• Offer
• Documentation of Deviations
• Order
• Kick-Off / Start-Up Meeting
• Order Confirmation
• Design (Engineering) Acceptance
• Commence of Production
• Pre-inspection Meeting
• Testing
• Final Documentation / Closing
• Delivery
12
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
IT Lessons LearnedKPMG 1992:• 62% of project managers
had experienced failures• 20% of the causes were due to
defective communicationQUALITY OF INFORMATION
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
InformationTime
Coordination
ProcessesTools
Guidance
Chemistry
Control
The most serious quality problems are related to:
Skills
QUALITY OF INFORMATION
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
InformationTime
Coordination
ProcessesTools
Guidance
Chemistry
Control
The most serious quality problems are related to:
Skills
Source: A 1999 survey of 880Finnish managers, white-collarsand workers in metal, wood andhospital industries
13
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Deficiency in s ubmittalof cus tomer's order data
Neglectfulnes s inworkload monitoring
Groundles s promis es
Coding mis takes in inter-company purchas e order
Lack of communication Deficiency in procurement
Production overload
Machinery breakdown
Sick leaves and holidays
Prioritis ation of otherconcurrent projects
Human errors Mis interpretations of cus tomer'ss pecifications and data
Neglectfulnes s of marking anddocumentation requirements
Workload of projectpers onne l
Human errors in trans latingcus tomer wants to work orders
Mis takes in acceptance criteria
Delayed approvals and comments
Delayed decis ion in orderplacement
Contradicting s pecificationsand technical data
Deficiency in document s ubmittal
Changes in purchas e orderduring project execution
Deficiency in documentingverbal agreements
Lacking s tart-up meeting ofproject
Lacking s tart-up meeting ofcus tomer s urve illance
Deficiency in unders tandingof cultural differencies
PROBLEMS
IN
PROJECT
QUALITY
V E N D O R
Engineering andCo-ordination
ProductionSales Office
INTERACTION CUSTOMER
Based on over 300Finnish metal industryprojects in 1985-98
• 50% dealingwith information
• 33% withinteraction
14
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
-10
10
30
50
70
90
110
130Information flow
Planning
Non-systematic process
Schedule problems
Resource planning
Learning from experience
Subcontractor errors
Cohesion problem
Lack of time
Change management
-10
10
30
50
70
90
110
130Information flow
Planning
Non-systematic process
Schedule problems
Resource planning
Learning from experience
Subcontractor errors
Cohesion problem
Lack of time
Change management
Identified problems of traditionalFinnish project contractors
15
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Mistakes -especially repeated mistakes are costly!
• in manufacturing industry in average 9% (2-25%) of salesare burned as quality costs
• in service industry 20 – 40% of operation costs• in public sector ……? (wild guess 75%)
Quality cost breakdown:prevention 5%appraisal 28%mistakes 67%
16
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
COST OF POOR QUALITY IS RELATIVE TO THEASSUMED ZERO DEFECT LEVEL
Six Sigma
© Paul Lillrank 2000InfoQ
17
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Marketing Sales Execution Closing LearningMarketing Sales Execution Closing Learning
PROJECT
KICK-OFF
START-UP
Knowledge Management:“the explicit and systematicmanagement of vital knowledgeand its associated processes ofcreation, organisation, diffusion,use and exploitation.”(Skyrme and Amidon, 1997)
KM: 70% people20% process10% technology
(Post Office Consulting, 1999OUBS UNIT 1 ‘ Managing Knowledge’)
18
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Is KM anything new?
KM = IM + ??• explicit
• what we know
what is known
• people
information &
knowledge
• tacit
• contextual &
cultural
• people
people
Sosiali-saatio
Ulkoista-minen
Sisäistä-minen
Yhdistä-minen
Eksplisiittinen Eksplisiittinen
Eksplisiittinen
Eksplisiittinen
Tacit
Tac
itT
acit
Tacit
SECI-prosessi
Nonaka, Toyama, Konno (2000)
Sosiali-saatio
Ulkoista-minen
Sisäistä-minen
Yhdistä-minen
Eksplisiittinen Eksplisiittinen
Eksplisiittinen
Eksplisiittinen
Tacit
Tac
itT
acit
Tacit
SECI-prosessi
Nonaka, Toyama, Konno (2000)
19
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Kick-off /Start-up meeting
• Client-Focused• Goal-Directed• People-Oriented
Eff
ectiv
enes
s
Efficiency
- - + -
+ +- +
Vision Statement• vision of success• does the activity help us to achieve our vision?
Team Building• in the same boat together
Project Charter• defines why we are doing the project = mission statement• mutual understanding with the client
Goals• consensus about 3 – 5 most critical goals• too many goals and you will loose the project focus
Barriers/Potential Barriers• per goal
Action Plans• deal with the barriers to accomplish the goals
Progress Measurements• develop methods to track the progress
Roles and Responsibilities• our role• client’s role
20
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Project Closing (Termination phase)
• Were the goals achieved?• What did we learn?• What were the problems/positive outcomes?• Why they happened?• What should be done to avoid repeated mistakes?• What processes or activities should be improved?• Who is responsible for improvements?• Where and in what form should the lessons learned
be stored/disseminated?• Who are the key persons needing immediate information?••
21
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Well informed smooth operationvs.
trial and error operation
Sub-contractor
����������
Engineering
Receiving
Productionsupervising
Production line
Logistics
Sales
Customer
= activities when doing bythe book
= activities when improvising
Yes
No
No
Yes
22
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Causes to Quality Problems
Information flowproblems
Qualityproblems
Initial dataproblems
Subcontractingproblems
Tight timeschedules
Lack ofresources
Logisticproblems
Poor workingconditions
Change mgmtproblems
Productionproblems
23
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Qualityproblems
Initial data problems
Effect of change notunderstood
Changes ininitial data
Change in timeschedule Customer
Too much ispromised
Marketsituation
Customer
Structure ofthe product
changes
Scopeexpansion
Productdevelopment not
completed
Freezing point onplanning not respected
Info needed beforeplanning scheduled to start
Customer’s problemsnot known
Noinstructions
Insufficientinitial data
Conflictingbreakdowns
Lot of issues,difficult to
control
Drawingsnot updated
Handling of offersnot consistent
Unclear definition ofneeded initial data
Customersdecisions late
Insufficientdocumentatio
n
Delayedinitial data
Customer does notknow what is
relevantAll attention in
older ordersPriorisation
problem
Delayed planning Surprisefaults
Unclearresponsibilitie
s
Change inpersonnel (sales-
production)
Insufficient infoflow
Lack of resourcesin planning
Tight timeschedules
Mistake inplanning
No personresponsible
Mistake inthe order
= one of nine problem categories
24
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Poorunderstanding of
the entirety
Insufficient flowof information
Poor understandingof the consequences
of change
Delayedinitial data
Overlappingactivities
Shortage ofown designresources
Insufficienttraining
Insufficientupdating
of schedules
Revisions of drawingsdon’t reach all
necessary people
Too much information
Lack of owndevelopment res.
Productincomplete
No commoninstructions
Lotus Notes -graveyard
for information
Too manycontact persons
Dirty renewals cause morework in relation to new machines
Concentrationon unessential
Absence ofsupportmaterial
Changes inthe organization
Additionalsales
Staffpolicy
Rush
Unrealisticschedules
Mistakes insubcontracting
Deliveryproblems
Repetitivemistakes
Fragmentationof information
Feedback hasnot reached
right persons
Unclearresponsibilities
Decreasedflexibility
Flexibilitymoved tosuppliers
Different sales andexecution personnel
New productsnot always ready
Insufficientbid preparation
Informationdoesn’t exist
Outsourcingpolicy
Corporationpolicy
Unopenedworking numbers
Change ofgeneration
Personnel fromunits that are
closed down havenot moved with
the business
Insufficient long-termpersonnel management
Wastage rateof key personnel
Poor quality ofsubcontracting
work
Last minutechanges
Things can beunderstood inmany ways
Lack of time
The customerdoesn’t know
what is essential
Inability tomanage thecustomer
Customer
Model specificationimperfect and contradictory
Aspiration toget to the market
Changes ininitial data
Wastage rateof personnel
Twisted experiencedistribution
Delayedautomation
Overload
Behindschedule
Synchronizingproblems of the
schedules
Poor usage ofinformation
Pointlesstransportation
and searching ofgoods
Controlsystem
ofoperations
Production andassembly errors
The following stagesare not taken into account
Problemsin change
management
One doesn’t knowwhere and when togive information Unclear basic
structures anddefinitions of policies
Incoherent andunstable procedures
Schedulechanges
Change inconcept
Attitudes
Feedback notprocessed
Earlier feedbacknot processed
Frustration
Feedbacknot given
Decreased numberof staff, more work
Subcontractingfails
Too manychanges
Physicaldistances
Disconnectednessof the organization
Unnecessarywork
Imprecise reviewat the sales phase
Unclear roles anddelivery boundaries
Pre-assemblynot done
Incompletedeliveries
Product developmenton site
Don’t knowhow to test
Fast cycle,no time to learn
Prototypes withfrequent intervals
Advancemarketing
Mistakein design
Scheduleproblems
Designers youngand inexperienced
Designers unfamiliarwith the paper machine
Designersin a hurry
New productresponsibilities
Insufficientinitial data
Drawingsnot updated
Differentsuppliers
Competitor’smachine
Increasedvolume
Sales doesn’tsay no
Huge numberof bids
Difficultiesin prioritization
Too manyissues to
manage effectively
Differencesof sales and
delivery
Marketsituation
Depression Boom
Poorraw materialavailability
Earlyretirements
Laborunion
houndspeople
Pressureand speed
Stress
Personneldecreased
to minimum
Unable tohire before
the previousemployeehas left
The newgeneration
doesn’t havemodels
Learning throughtry and mistake
Key personnelhas disappeared
A lot ofrenewals
Shortage ofskilled personnel
Experienced stafffired during the
depression
Unattractivebusiness
Positioncirculation
Appreciation
Shortage ofresources at
assemblyreparation
Most of the personneltransferred after
mechanical assembly
Internal producttraining is not
arranged
Resources
Need of skills andgrowth of responsibilitynot noticed in training
Insufficient definitionof needed initial data
Project managementteam is not informed
Everybody don’tknow the schedule
Sales doesn’t knowavailable resources
Holidays are nottaken into account
Cableswrong
Tightschedules
Competition
Sales is forcedto make tight
schedules
Poorpackages
Informationgiven to
suppliers isnot
precise enough
Problems indata transfer Lack of
experience
No time fortraining
No training
Limited numberof trained suppliers
Shortage ofinspection res.
Unable to controlprofessional skills
No time
No inspection
Issues are nottold forward
Instructions arenot followed
Not enough attentionis given to choose thesuppliers/ they are not
demanded enough
Big numberof revisions
Manysuppliers
Desire todecrease number
of suppliers
Electronicdata transfer
Understandingis not controlled
Complexity of theBaan system
Don’t knowhow to use
Management notcommitted
Lacking skillsamong drawers
Drawings not madefor production
Blueprinterrors
No time foundfor inspection
Not heldimportant
Everybodyoptimizes
their own phase
Carelessness
Too easy toproduce information
Development actionsare not taken after reviews
Corrective actions related tolabor protection are forgotten
Non-commitmentto
labor protection
Inability todifferentiate
between essentialand
unessential
Insufficienciesin globalactivities
Limitedsupply indomesticmarket
Internalinstructions are
not followed
Mistakes duecarelessness
Incorrect wayof dimensioning
Lacking knowledgeon customers’ problems
Money
Practicingbusiness more
important
The customerwouldn’t want tostop the machine
Widenedscope
Model picturesare not updated
Ambitionto JOT Operating
withoutbuffers
Decreasing warehousingcosts creates bills ofthousands of marks
Limited numberof meetings with
suppliers
MPM,BRD New responsibilities
Lack ofcontrol
Supplier’sdelay or early
delivery
Problems indelivery accuracy
Valmet wantscheap hours
Suppliers haveuntrained staff
Minordevelopment
effort
It doesn’tfunction as
thought
Suppliersoutsourceactivities
Resources
Unwillingness touse Lotus Notes
Organization trimmedto deliver new machines
Workplace ischanged easier
nowadays
Lack ofsupport
activities
Example: The Knowledge Map
25
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
“Knowledge is like fruit, its context andtiming is the key to its potential and real value.
Unless you can exploit it within that timing,someone elsewill come along and steal it,or you will have to throw it away”(Victor Newman, 2000)
• How should we documentthe closing information?
• Where should it be stored?• How could the dissemination ofknowledge be ensured?
?
26
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Two research and development projects:• COPQ-project with focus on cost of quality
= COPQ in project environment isanalogous to risk
= Workshop methodology for problemand root cause identification
• Promes-project with focus on performanceefficiency in project delivery chain
= Workshop methodology for problemand root cause identification
Problem items indifferent projects
Sign
ific
ance
Through trial and error: The 3AWS-Procedure
http://www.tuta.hut.fi/laku or http://www.tai.hut.fi/promes
27
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Sales Planning Design Mfg Logistics Care
CEO
Project 1
Project 2
Project n
Functional inefficiencies = problems
Project risks
Analogy with QM’scommon and specific causes
28
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
Measuring quality(success) inproject environment:
• is often regarded same as measuring success
• several researchers have concluded that measuringa project success in solely objective terms is animpossible task
• whether a project is considered as a success or notis strongly dependent on the stakeholdersperspectives
29
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
PCT application time schedule
PCT II National Entry
0 12 18 19 20 30 months
Filing PCT filing
PCT Publication PCT II Demand
PCT National Entry
The clock starts by filing a patent!
≈≈≈≈ 1.500 FIM≈≈≈≈ 15.000 FIM≈≈≈≈ 15.000 FIM
After this pointn x 100.000 FIM
Case: Quality in timing
30
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
EVERYTHING INVENTED IS NOT WORTH INVESTING
INVENTIONINVENTION
Does it createvalue forend-users ?
Does it createvalue forthe CUSTOMER ?
yes
no
yes
no
End-user value Customer valueNon-value-adding invention
= waste
31
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
INFORMATION QUALITY ATTRIBUTES
States and eventsof the world
MEASUREMENT
DATA standardized symbolicrepresentations
RELIABILITYHow consistently do thesymbols represent the world(data quality)
INFORMATION value-added datain a context
CONTEXT
VALIDITYRelevance of informationin a given context
ACTIONACCURACYThe ability to trigger action(=create value)
© Paul Lillrank 2000InfoQ
32
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
ACCURACY AND PRECISION
ACCURACY
PRECISION
Bad
Good
Bad Good
© Paul Lillrank 2000InfoQ
33
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
QUALITY CONCEPTS
1) Conformance and performance
2) Context dependent
3) Process and product qualityseparate but interdependent
4) Quality is realized as value througha transaction / exchange
5) Quality and price are linkedthrough a value mechanism, e.g.customer satisfaction
6) The value mechanism behavesdynamically
1) Content and form
2) Context and meaning
3) Information quality andinformation system quality
4) Information value realizedthrough what (action) it triggers
5) Quality and action are linkedthrough reliability, validity andaccuracy (attention ???)
6) Information inflation
PRODUCTS & SERVICESPRODUCTS & SERVICES INFORMATIONINFORMATION
© Paul Lillrank 2000InfoQ
34
TAI RESEARCH CENTREPekka Järvinen /S2001 ProDev
THE VICIOUS CIRCLE IS SNOWBALLING TOWARDSTHE END
Incomplete planning &process managementMissed
dates
Work onprematureplans
Changes latein the process
Emergencies
Overtime
Waste ofresources
Extensive use ofsubcontractors
Coordination
Basic Design -> Work Drawings -> Steel -> Machinery -> Outfitting
© Paul Lillrank 2000InfoQ