Phase Field Modeling and Simulations of Interfacial ... · Tanaka-Hotani Capovilla-Guven-Santiago...
Transcript of Phase Field Modeling and Simulations of Interfacial ... · Tanaka-Hotani Capovilla-Guven-Santiago...
1
Phase Field Modeling and Simulations of Interfacial Problems - a Tutorial on Basic Ideas and Selected Applications
Qiang Du Department of Mathematics Pennsylvania State University
2
Diffuse interface/Phase field: a geometric view
ε Γ
φ~1
φ~-1
Ω
Γ
• How to describe the geometric features of Γ by φ ?
How about other geometric features, interfacial physics?
Volume (difference) :
Computational domain
Area:
3
Continuum Theory: Bending Elasticity Model • Earlier studies: Canhem 70, Helfrich 73, Evans 79, Fung, …
• Hypothesis: vesicle Γ minimizes bending elasticity energy, subject to volume/area constraints
Related to the Willmore problem Special case of Helfrich energy
k1 k2
mean curvature
min subj. to volume/area constraints
4
Strategy: Phase Field Calculus Geometric calculus: variation of surface area/surface tension leads to mean curvature
Phase Field Calculus
Consistency in energy (functional)
and variation (force)
Γ-limit
5
Diffuse Interface Bending Energy Model
• Extension to other geometric features, curvatures … Du-Liu-Wang JCP 2004, 2006, Du-Liu-Ryham-Wang CPAA 2005
• Geometric calculus translates into phase field calculus for mean curvature square energy
6
Sharp interface limit • In Du-Liu-Ryham-Wang (Nonlinearity 2005), and
later Wang (SIAM Math Ana 2008), by taking a general ansatz
it was shown
in addition, the variation Willmore stress
7
Phase Field Calculus for Bending Elasticity
Geometric calculus Phase field calculus
and the variation Willmore stress
Again: a consistent phase field model
8
Bending energy/Willmore functional Some relevant works Image impaintng: use of Eulers elastica Chan-Kang-Shen, Esedoglu-Shen, March-Dozio Amphiphilic layer, vesicle membrane Grompper-Schick,Misbah et al, Campelo et al Willmore problem: given surface boundary Dziuk et al, Clarenz
Action minimization: a time dependent variation Kohn et al
Gamma convergence: on least squares DeGiorgi, Roger-Schätzle
9
Simulations: equilibrium shapes
Configurations controlled by excess area: σ = 1 sphere σ > 1 ?
discocytes
stomatocytes Du-Zhang 2009
Du-Liu-Wang 2004
Michalet-Bensimon
Theory of Ou-Yang
Du-Liu-Wang 2006 JCP
¾ = ( A = 4 ¼ ) 1 = 2
( 4 V ¼ = 3 ) 1 = 3
10
Simulations vs. Experiments
Berndl et al 1990: vesicle deformation in response to changing temperature
cross sections of 3d vesicles (Du-Liu-Wang JCP 2004)
43.8-44.1oC
11
Numerical simulation
energy diagram
12
Modeling multi-component membranes
• Diffuse interface simulations (Wang- D. 2007 J Math Bio)
Comparing our simulation with experiment (Baumgart et al, Nature 2003)
13
Multi-component vesicles • Recent experimental studies of multicomponent membranes revealed intricate domain structures which are important for biological functions
• Phase field description of deformable multicomponent membrane: multiple phase field functions for both the vesicle (co-dimension 1 surface) and phase boundary (co-dimension 2 curve) of individual components
14
Phase Field Modeling • Wang- D. 2007 J. Math. Bio. : Phase field model for Bending elastic energy + line tension
subject to fixed total volume and fixed individual phase areas
15
Diffuse Interface Modeling • Diffuse interface model for line tension
Adelman-Kawasaki-Kawakatsu
Ji-Lookman-Saxena
Double well Φ
16
Similar extension: membrane with free edges
• An open membrane is taken as a closed membrane with two components, with zero bending rigidity in one of them
(Wang-Du 2007)
Saitoh-Takiguchi-Tanaka-Hotani Capovilla-Guven-Santiago Umeda-Suezaki-Takiguchi-Hotani Ouyang-Tu
17
Phase field models of vesicle membranes
So far, we have discussed:
Models and simulations of equilibrium configurations of the single and multi-component vesicles
Next, we discuss various extensions: • Gradient dynamic models • Interaction with fluid and hydrodynamics models • Interactions with substrate
18
Dynamic phase field bending elasticity models
Dynamics via gradient flow:
Allen Cahn type: 4-th order in space
Conservative Cahn Hilliard : 6-th order in space
Compare with Cahn Hilliard dynamics for surface tension: different energy law
19
Extension: vesicle membranes in fluid • Experimental works
• Modeling/simulations Lipowsky, Grompper, Noguchi, Misbah, Nochetto…
Tsukada et al 2001 Shelby et al 2003
Noguchi-Gompper 2005 Abkarian-Faivre-Stone 2006
20
Phase-Field Navier-Stokes Model Du-Liu-Ryham-Wang 2009
Du-Liu-Wang 2006 Du-Li-Liu 2006
Membrane Elastic bending
Fluid Incompressible
viscous
transport
Willmore stress
Hydrodynamics interaction with flow:
Navier-Stokes
Willmore stress
Phase field
Allen-Cahn/Cahn-Hilliard fluid transport
21
PFBENS
Lemma: Energy law
Du-Li-Liu 2007 DCDS
For positive ε, µ and ν Theorem: Existence of weak solution (via Galerkin) Theorem: Uniqueness is shown (for 3d case under extra
regularity condition on the velocity profile)
ν can be 0, I or -Δ
22
PFNS: sharp interface limit interface conditions (no slip ) (γ = 0)
23
Comments on PFNS model:
• Among many studies of membrane/fluid interactions, only a few models incorporate bending elastic energy (Lipowski, Grompper, Noguchi, Brown, Misbah, Nochetto, Atzberger)
The PFNS model • follows from the kinetic/elastic energy competition • has an energy law consistent to sharp interface • enforces incompressibility everywhere • can incorporate inhomogeneities, fluactuations
24
Numerical Examples
• Membrane/fluid interactions (competition of kinetic energy and bending elastic energy)
Du-Liu-Wang 2006 Spectral code developed by Dr. Xiaoqiang Wang (IMA and FSU)
cutting view 3d view
25
Some examples
• Membrane/fluid interactions (single vesicle)
Du-Liu-Wang 2006 cutting view 3d view
26
Some examples
• Membrane/fluid interactions (single vesicle)
Noguchi-Gompper cutting view 3d view
27
Stochastic Implicit Interface Method
• Developed for – Fluid-Microstructure (Interface) interaction. – External fluctuation effects.
• Motivated by stochastic immersed boundary method (Kramer-Peskin/Atzberger-Kramer-Peskin)
• Based on – Implicit interface formulation. – Fluctuation-dissipation theorem.
(Du – M. Li 2010 DCDS and 2010 Ach. Rat. Mech )
(Manlin Li Ph.D thesis 2010 Penn State)
28
Stochastic Implicit Interface Method • Reformulation
nice structure if G=0, but need to estimate the effect due to the stochastic integral G
29
Stochastic Implicit Interface Method A special case: quasi-steady Stokes flow
• Formally
• Multiplicative noise (very little analytic theory)
• Comparison with Langevin gradient dynamics
30
Stochastic Implicit Interface Method • Quasi-steady Stokes flow • Some insight from spatial discretization
• Let
• Stratonovich (instead of Ito) Boltzmann
,
L: semi-infinite
31
Stochastic Immersed Boundary Method
• Quasi-steady Stokes flow, finite # of particle
Stratonovich
• In Ito form:
Periodic BC/Fourier basis: Stratonovich reduces to Ito, allowing further reduction of the multiplicative noise to a finite dimensional representation
32
Diffuse interface Consistency with sharp interface description Diffuse interface:
Single set of equations with smooth solutions
Easier to handle topological changes (interface recovered from the phase field function);
Need to use a parameter ε (artificial or physical)
Computational domain has a higher dimension;
Adaptivity helps to reduce computational cost
33
Spatial discretization: FEM • Mixed formulation with C0 linear element + mass lumping ( FVM in general mesh or FDM for
Cartesian mesh) : lower differentiation order via integration by parts
• Theorem: as h 0 , a subsequence of approximate solutions converges to a solution of the continuous problem (via uniform bounds and compactness)
(Du-Wang, IJNAM 2006)
34
Spatial discretization: FEM • Mixed formulation : TZ=F(Z) with T of the form
Linear part: nested saddle point problem (framework developed in Chen-Du-Zou SINUM 1999)
Nonlinear part: as compact perturbation (BRR)
– Theorem: as h 0 , we have the convergence and optimal order error H 1 estimates (Du-Zhu, JCM 2006)
• Extension of Aubin-Nitsche to nonlinear case
– Theorem: as h 0 , we have the convergence and optimal order error L 2 estimates (L. Zhu, MMAS)
35
Adaptive 3d FEM
mesh density
Total #s of freedom N ~ O(ε-2)
code developed by Jian Zhang, anisotropic adaptivity?
• Phase field functions are computed in 3d domain mainly to resolve the 2d interface, adaptive FEM improves the efficiency (Provatas-Goldenfeld-Dantzig, Tonhardt-Amberg, Feng-Wu, Bänsch-Haußer-Lakkis-Li-Voigt, Braun-Murray, … ) • Adaptive FEM for vesicle deformation based on residual type a posteriori error estimates (Du-Zhang SISC 2008) • 3D Computation gets reduced to 2D complexity
36
Spatial discretization: Fourier spectral
Application to phase field models (Chen-Shen 92): Phase field functions are smooth with given interfacial width Superior accuracy, fast implementation via FFT Rigid Cartesian grid structure Accuracy degradation if the interface is under resolved
To better represent interfacial region Moving mesh Fourier spectral (Yu-Du-Chen 2006,
Feng-Yu-Hu-Liu-Du-Chen 2006): following works of Winslow, Nakashashi-Deiwert, Bayliss-Kuske-Matkowsky, Huang-Ren-Russell, Ceniceros-Hou,… )
37
Moving Mesh/Fourier Spectral (MMFS) (Feng-Yu-Hu-Liu-Du-Chen, JCP 2006)
• Large gradient in physical domain requires high resolution, thus necessitates fine uniform mesh
• To make grids clustered near physical interface, a map is used between the computational and physical domain so that the grids still remain uniform in the computational domain
• MMFS (Moving Mesh Fourier spectral method): mesh evolves with solution to provide maximum resolution in the physical domain
• Overcome the complication of inhomogeneous coefficients due to mesh motion to allow FFT, reduce overall system size and improve accuracy
• Performance gain despite of the overhead
Computational
mesh
Physical
mesh
38
Moving Mesh/Fourier Spectral (MMFS)
• Overcome the complication of inhomogeneous coefficients due to mesh motion to allow FFT
e.g. Allen-Cahn
• Reduce system size and improve accuracy • Mesh update may be less frequent • Performance gain despite of the overhead
39
Phase field/diffuse interface model • Phase field type methods are insensitive
to topological changes as interfaces are recovered implicitly from the order parameters. Large scale simulations are often able to reveal very complex morphological patterns
• It is important to perform quantitative statistical analysis (data mining) for large scale simulations!
• Sometimes it may be desirable to detect/control the topology of implicitly defined interfaces
LQ Chen et al
40
Phase field/diffuse interface model
• How to retrieve interesting microstructure statistics from the order parameter?
• Connect geometry with topology, allow effective detection and control of topological events
Du-Liu-Wang SIAM Appl Math 2005
• Formulae are developed to retrieve certain topological quantities such as surface genus (Euler number) from the order parameter
41
Phase field/diffuse interface model • Phase field type methods are insensitive
to topological changes as interfaces are recovered implicitly from the order parameters. Large scale simulations are often able to reveal very complex morphological patterns
• It is important to perform quantitative statistical analysis (data mining) for large scale simulations!
• Sometimes it may be desirable to detect/control the topology of implicitly defined interfaces
LQ Chen et al
42
Phase field/diffuse interface modeling
• Eg: how to retrieve/detect topological info of implicitly defined structure?
(Note: level-set/phase field methods are insensitive to topological changes: advantage or deficiency?)
Du -Liu-Wang SIAM Appl Math 2005
• Formulae are developed to detect /control topology change in shape transformation via Euler number
43
Numerical simulation • Shapes with same elastic bending energy
but different topology (Euler number)
elastic bending energy
Euler number
Key 1: Euler numbers may be recovered from curvature via Gauss-Bonnet formula Key 2: phase field models can compute curvature related energy effectively via suitable integration
44
Euler-Poincare index with diffuse interface
• In 3d:
• In 2d:
Diffuse-Interface Based Euler number !
D. -Liu-Wang 2004 SIAP
45
Euler-Poincare index • Further simplification in some special ansatz
D. -Liu-Ryham-Wang 2007 CMS Regularization + Renormalization
46
Automated topological information retrieval
• Gradient flow of bending energy for vesicles subject to volume and surface area
• A spectral method based implementation
D.-Liu-Wang SIAM Appl Math 2005
47
Topology of self-intersecting surfaces • Nature often leads to piecewise smooth interfaces (3d cylindrically symmetric surfaces)
(2d curves) • Phase field solutions allow self-intersecting (piecewise smooth) interfaces • The phase field based Euler number provides detection of singularities/self-intersections
48
Extension: study of adhesion and vesicle fusion
Adhesion: critical to biological processes such as exocytosis, endocytosis,... (Yeagle, The membrane of cells, 1993)
Fusion: important for lipid transport, pathogen entry,…
www.yellowtang.org/cells.php wikipedia
49
Vesicle substrate interaction via diffuse interface Zhang-Das-Du JCP 2009
with Additional contribution due to adhesion
Diffuse interface formulation
No need to specify contact region
− w(x)P(d(x,Γ
∫ ΓS ))dΓ
H 2
Γ
∫ dΓ
50
Multicomponent Vesicle substrate interaction Parthasarathy-Yu-Groves, Rozycki-Weikl-Lipowsky, ….
Sohn-Tseng-Li-Voigt-Lowengrub,
Funkhouser-Solis-Thorton,
Adelman-Kawasaki-Kawakatsu
Ji-Lookman-Saxena
+ Z
¡ ¾
£ » 2 ¯ ¯ r ¡ ´
¯ ¯ 2 + 1 4 »
© ( ́ ) ¤ d ¡ ¡
Z
¡ w ( c 0 + c 2 ́ ) P ( d ( x ) ) d ¡ ;
E ( ́ ) = Z
¡ ( c 0 + c 1 ́ )
£ H ¡ a ( c 0 + c 3 ́ )
¤ 2 d ¡
sharp-interface diffuse interface ( η : new phase field function)
Zhang-Das-Du PRE 2010
Phase change on Γ:
51
Multi-component Vesicle substrate interaction Zhang-Das-Du PRE 2010
Adhesion induced phase separation, substantiating claims made in Gordon-Deserno-Andrew-Egelhaaf-Poon, 2008 EPL
With
Adhesion
52
Multi-component Vesicle Fusion
Zhang-Du PRE 2011
Motivation: adhesion-induced fusion – Lipowsky 1991 Nature
53
Multicomponent Vesicle substrate interaction Zhang-Das-Du PRE 2010
Adhesion induced phase separation