Monopsychism of Latin Averroists - aequivocum.netaequivocum.net/monopsy/doc/bibkawazoe.pdf ·...

S BFor study of so-called Monopsychism of Latin Averroists

in late 13th Century

0.951 β(tentative)

2006/4/21, 11:13pm

Contents

1 Tools 11.1 Bibliographical repertory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.2 Lexicon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

2 Primary Text 32.1 Greek-Latin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

2.1.1 Over View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.1.2 Text . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2.2 Arabic-Latin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62.2.1 Over View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62.2.2 Text . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

2.3 Latin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92.3.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92.3.2 Text . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

3 Secondary 223.1 Over View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223.2 Aristotele and Late Antiquity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233.3 The Avicennism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

3.3.1 Avicenna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243.3.2 Avicenna Latinus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

3.4 The Averroism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263.4.1 Averroes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263.4.2 Averroes Latinus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

3.5 The Condemnations 1270-1277 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313.5.1 The Condemnations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313.5.2 The Faculties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

3.6 Siger de Brabantia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353.7 Albertus Magnus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363.8 Thomas Aquinas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383.9 Aegidius Romanus etc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

1, 1.1 Bibliography 1

+ : in Kyoto Univ.@ : somewhere in Japanℵ : nowhere in Japan

1 Tools

1.1 Bibliographical repertory

[1] Bibliographie annuelle du Moyen Age tardif: auters et textes, vers 1250-1500, 1 (1991) ff. @

[2] Bibliographie de la philosophie, 1 (1954) ff. +

[3] International Medieval Bibliography, 1 (1968) ff.@ [+:89-03]

[4] Cavallo, G., Leonardi, 1992-1998. C. et Menesto, E. eds. Lo spazioletterario del Medioevo., 5 vols., Roma: Salerno Editore. +

[5] Medioevo latino. Bolletino bibliografico della cultura europea da Boezio aErasmo (secoli VI-XV), 1 (1980) ff. +

[6] Repertoire bibliographique de la philosophie, 1 (1949) ff.@ [+:49-96]

[7] Speculum, 1 (1926) ff.: Since 1973 the January issue of this journalincluded a “Bibliography of Editions and Translations in Progress ofMedieval Texts”, compiled by L.L. Gracia. +

1


[8] Mantello, F.A.C, et Rigg, A.G. eds, 1996. Medieval Latin. An Intro-duction and Bibliographical Guide, Washington, D.C.: The CatholocUniversity of America Press. @

[9] Schulthess, P. et Imbach, R. 1996. Die Philosophie im lateinischenMittelalter: ein Handbuch mit einem bio-bibliographischen Repertorium,Zurich: Artemis und Winkler. +

1.2 Lexicon

[10] Dictionary of Middle Ages, 13 vols.. New York, 1982-1989. +

[11] Dictionnaire d’histoire et de geographie ecclesiastiques, Paris, 1912 ff. +

[12] Dictionnaire du Moyen Age. Litterature et philosophie, Paris: Encyclo-pedia Universalis-Albin Michel, 1999. (articles extracted from Ency-clopedia universalis). +

[13] Dictionnaire du Moyen Age, Paris: PUF, 2002. +

[14] Dictionnaire encyclopedique du Moyen Age, 2 vols. Paris: Cerf. +

[15] Dictionnaire de spiritualite ascetique et mystique, 26 vols., Paris: Beauch-esne, 1937-1994. +

[16] Dictionnaire de Theologie catholique, 28 vols., Paris, 1930-1972. +

[17] Historisches Worterbuch der Philosophie, Basel 1971 ff. +

[18] Biographisch-bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon, Hamm, Westf.: VerlagTraugott Bautz , 1990-. +

[19] Lexikon des Mittelalters, 10 vols., Munchen/Zurich, 1977-1999. +

[20] Lexikon fur Theologie und Kirche, 11 vols. Freiburg [etc.]: Herder, 1993-2001. ℵ

2


[21] Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 10 vols., London: Routledge,1998. +

[22] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosopy http://plato.stanford.edu/

2 Primary Text

2.1 Greek-Latin

2.1.1 Over View

[23] Hamesse, J., Fattori, M. eds. 1990. Rencontres de cultures dans la philoso-phie medievale. Traduction et traducteurs de l’Antiquite tardive au XIVesiecle, Louvain-la-Neuve-Cassino. @

[24] Lohr, C.H. “Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries”, Traditio 23(1967), pp.313-413 (A-F); 24 (1968), pp.149-254 (G-I); 26 (1970),pp.135-216 (Jacobus – Johannes Juff); 27 (1971), pp.251-351 (Jo-hannes de Kanthi – Myngodus); 28 (1972), pp.281-396 (Narcissus– RIchardus); 29 (1973), pp.93-197 (Robertus — Wilhelmus); 30(1974), pp.119-144 (Supplementary). “Addenda et corrigenda”, inBulletin de philosophie medievale 14 (1972), pp.116-26

@ [1972]

[25] Lohr, C.H. 1988. Commentateurs d’Aristote au moyen age latin. Bibliogra-phie de la litterature secondaire recente, Fribourg: Press Universitaires.

@

[26] Lohr, C.H. 1995. Latin Aristotle commentaries, Firenze: L.S. Olschki.+

[27] Schmittt, C.B. et Knox, D. 1985. Pseudo-Aristoteles Latinus: A Guide toLatin Works Falsly Attributed to Aristotle Before 1500. London: WarburgInstitute, University of London. +

3


[28] Virginia, B. et al. eds. 2003. Catalogus Translationum Et Commentari-orum: Medieval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries:Annotated Lists and Guides. + [v.2-v.8], @ [v.1]

[29] Wielockx. R. 1987. “Guillaume de Moerbeke, reviseur de sa revisiondu “De anima””, Recherches de theologie ancienne et medievale 54 (1987),pp.113-185. @

[30] Brams, J, et Vanhamel, W. 1989. Guillaume de Moerbeke: recueil d’etudesa l’occasion du 700e annivers aire de sa mort (1286), Louvain: LouvainUP. @

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

[31] Thirry, A. 1971. “Recherches relatives aux commentaires medievauxdu “De anima” d’Aristote”, Bulletin de philosophie medievale edite parSIEPM. 13 (1971), pp.109-128. @

[32] Verbeke, G. 1990. “Les Progres de l’Aristote latin: le cas du De anima”.in [23], pp.187-201. @

2.1.2 Text

[33] Aristoteles, De anima (Iacobi), edited in [176]. @

[34] —–, edited in [111]. +

[35] —–, edited in [120]. @

[36] —–, De anima (Moerbeka), edited in [203]. +

[37] ? vide [68]. @

[38] Alexander of Aphrodisias, De intellectu et intellecto, ed. G. Thery,in Autour du decret de 1210, II. — Alexandre d’Aphrodise, Kain, 1926,pp.74-82. +

4


[39] —–, English translation of [38], by F.M. Schroeder et R.B. Todd, TwoGreek Aristotelian Commentators on the Intellect, Toronto: PIMS (Me-dieval Sources in Translation 33), 1990. @

[40] —–, Supplement to “On the soul”, translated by R.W. Sharples, Ithaca,N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2004. +

[41] Johannes Damascenus, De fide orthodoxa, ed. E.M. Buytaert, NewYork/Louvain/Paderborn, 1955. +

[42] Nemesius of Emesa, De natura hominis, ed. J.R. Moncho et G. Verbeke,Leiden, 1975. @?

[43] Philoponus, Commentaire sur le De anima d’Aristote, traduction de Mo-erbeke, ed. G. Verbeke, Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in Aris-totelem Graecorum 3, Louvain/Paris, 1966 (In De anima III). +

[44] —–, English translation of [43], by W. Charlton, On Aristotle on theintellect (De anima 3.4-8), Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991.

+

[45] Platon, Timaeus (tr. Chalcidii), ed. J.H. Waszink, London, 1962 (PlatoLatinus, IV), pp.1-52. +

[46] Proclus, Die mittelalterliche Ubersetzung der Stoixeiwsij fusikh desProclus (Procli Diadochi Lycii Elementatio physica), ed. Boese, H.Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1958 +

[47] —–, Commentaire sur le Parmenide de Platon (tr. Moerbeke) 2 vols., ed.C. Steel, Leuven: Leuven UP - Leiden : Brill, 1982-1985. +

[48] Simplicius, Commentaire sur les categories d’Aristote (tr. Moerbeke), edby A. Pattin et al. 2 vols., Louvain: Louvain UP. 1971-1975.

+ [v.2], @ [v.1]

[49] Themistius, De anima, ed. G. Verbeke, in Commentaire sur le Traite del’ame d’Aristote (Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in AristotelemGraecorum 1), Louvain: Louvain U.P. 1957. @?

5


[50] —–, English translation of [49], by R.B. Todd, Themistius. On Aristotle‘On the soul’, London: Duckworth, 1996. +

[51] —–, English translation of [49], in [39]. @

[52] Theophrastus, Theophrastus of Eresus. Sources for His Life, Writings,Thought and Influence, ed. and tr. by W.W. Fortenbaugh, et al., Leiden:Brill, 1992. +

2.2 Arabic-Latin

2.2.1 Over View

[53] Daiber, H. 1999. Bibliography of Islamic Philosophy, 2 vols. Leiden. +

[54] U B (A)http://www.thomasinst.uni-koeln.de/averroes/

[55] U B (A P)http://philosophy.cua.edu/faculty/tad/biblio.cfm

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

[56] Daiber, H. 1990. “Lateinische Ubersetzungen arabischer Texte zurPhilosophie und ihre Bedeutung fur die Scholastik des Mitelalters.Stand und Aufgaben der Forschung” in [23], pp.203-250. @

[57] d’Alverny, M.-T. 1952, “Note sur les traductions medievalesd’Avicenne”, in Archives d’histoire doctorinale et litteraire du moyenage 19 (1952), pp.337-358. +

[58] d’Alverny, M.-T. 1993. Avicenne en occident. Recueil d’articles de Marie-Therese d’Alberny reunis en hommage a l’auteur, Paris, 1993. +

[59] d’Alverny, M.-T. 1994. Avicenna Latinus. Codices, Louvain-la-Neuve/Leiden, 1994. +

6


[60] Kischlat, Harald, 2000. Sttudien zur Verbreitung von Ubersetzungenarabischer philosophischer Werke in Westeuropa 1150-1400. Das Zeugnisder Bibliotheken. (Beitrage zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mite-lalters), Bd.54, Munster. @

2.2.2 Text

[61] Alfarabi, De intellctu, ed. E. Gilson, in Archives d’histoire doctrinale etlitteraire du moyen age, 4 (1929), pp.115-126. +

[62] Algazel, Metaphysica, ed. J.T.Muckle, Toronto, 1933 (Latin Translationof Maqas. id al-falasifa). +

[63] —–, “Logica Algazelis: Introduction and Critical Text”, ed.CH. Lohr.Traditio 21 (1961), pp.223-290. +

[64] Alhazen (Ibn al-Haytham), De aspectibus. In Opticae thesaurus AlhazeniArabis libri septem ... Ed. by F. Risner, Basel 1572 (repr. with intro. byD.C. Lindberg, New York, 1972). @

[65] Alkindi, De intellectu, ed. A. Nagy, in Beitrage zur Geschichte derPhilosophie des Mitelalters, Bd.2, Heft 5, Munster, 1897, pp.1-11. +

[66] Alpetragius (al-bit.rujiı), De motibus celorum. Latin trans. by MichaelScot, ed. F.J. Carmody, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1952. +

[67] —–, On the Principles of Astronomy. Ed. and tr. B.R. Goldstein, NewHaven, Conn., 1971. +

[68] Aristoteles (arabica: tr. Michael Scotus), De anima, edited in [73]. @

[69] Ps.- Aristoteles, Liber de Causis, ed. A. Pattin, Leuven, 1966. @

[70] Avencebrol seu Avicebron, Fons Vitae, ed. C. Baeumeker, Beitrage zurGeschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, Bd.1, Hefte 2-4, Munster,1895. @

7


[71] Averroes, Aristotelis opera cum commentariis Averrois, Venetia, 1562-1574 (repr. Frankfurt a, M., 1962).

+ @ [v.4]

[72] —–, Commentarium librorum Aristotelis qui parva naturalia vocantur,ed. A.L. Shields, Cambridge/Mass., 1949. +

[73] —–, Commentarium magnum in Aristotelis de anima libros, ed. F.S. Craw-ford, Cambridge/Mass., 1953. +

[74] —–, French trans. of Book III of [73], by A. de Liber, L’intelligence etla pensee, Paris: GF Flammarion, 1998.

[75] —-, Commentarium medium in Aristotelis de generatione et corruptionelibros, ed. F.H. Fobes, Cambridge/Mass., 1956 +

[76] —–, Commentarium medium super libros Peri Hermeneias Aristotelis.Translatio Wilhelmo de Luna attributa, ed. R. Hissette, Louvain, 1996.

+

[77] Avicenna, Opera philosophica, Venice, 1508 (repr. Louvain, 1961). @

[78] —–, Compendium de anima, De mahad. i. de dispositione .... ed. P. Alpago,Venice, 1546 (repr. Farnborough, 1969). ?

[79] —–, Liber de anima seu Sextus de naturalibus, ed. S. Van Riet, 2 vols,Louvain/Leiden, 1968-1972. +

[80] —–, Liber De Philosophia prima sive Scientia divina, ed. S. Van Riet, 3vols, Louvai/Leiden, 1977-1983. +

[81] —–, English trans. of [80]. The Metaphysics of Healing, by M.E. Mar-mura, Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press. 2005 +

[82] —–, French trans. of [80]. La Metaphysique du “Shifa”. 2 vols. by G.C.Anawati. Paris: Vrin, 1978, 1985. +

8


[83] —–, Liber tertius naturalium de generatione et corruptione, ed. S. VanRiet, Louvain-la-Neuve/Leiden, 1987. +

[84] —–, Liber quartus naturalium de actionibus et passionibus qualitatumprimarum, ed. S. Van Riet, Louvain-la-Neuve/Leiden, 1989. +

[85] —–, Liber primus naturalium, tractatus primus de causis et principiisnaturalium, ed. S. Van Riet, Louvain-la-Neuve/Leiden, 1992. +

[86] Constantinus Africanus, Liber Pantegni ysaac ... quem Constantinusaphricnus ... sibi vendicavit, 1515. ℵ

[87] —–, Pantegni, Theorica IV, 19: De spriritibus, ed. Ch. Burnett, in Ch.Burnett et D. Jacquart, eds., Constantine the African and ‘Alı ibn al-‘Abbas al-Magusı. The “Pantegni” and Related Texts, Leiden [etc.], 1994(Studies in Ancient Medicine, 10), pp.113-117. @

[88] Costa ben Luca, De differentia spiritus et animae, ed. J.C. Wilcox, inThe Transmission and Influence of Qusta ibn Luqa’s “On the Differencebetween Spirit and Soul”, University Microfilms International, AnnArbor, Mich., 1985, pp.143-191. ℵ

[89] Iohannitius, Isagoge ad Teche Galieni, ed. G. Maurach, Sudhoffs Archiv62,2 (1978), pp.148-174. ℵ

[90] Isaac Israeli, De diffinitionibus, ed. J.T. Muckle, in Archives d’histoiredoctrinale et litteraire du moyen age 11 (1937-1938), pp.299-340. +

2.3 Latin

2.3.1 Overview

[91] Mieth, T.L, Bourke, V. 1980, Thomistic Bibliography 1940-1978, West-port, Conn.: Greenwood Press. +

9


[92] Ingardia, R. 1993, Thomas Aquinas: International Bibliography 1977-1990, Bowling Green, Ohio: The Philosophy Documentation Center.

+

[93] Stegmuller, F. 1947. Repertorium commentariorum in Sententias PetriLombardi, 2 vols, Wurzburg: Herbipoli Schoning. ℵ

– Doucet, V. 1954. Commentaires sur les Sentences: Supplement aurepertoire de M. Frederic Stegmueller, Firenze: Ad Claras Aquas.

@

– Van Dyk, J. 1979 “Thirty Years since Stegmuller: A Bibliograph-ical Guide to the Study of Medieval Sentence Commentariessince the Publication of Stegmuller’s Repertorium commentario-rum in Sententias Petri Lombardi (1947)”, in Franciscan Studies 39(1979), pp.255-315. +

[94] Evans, G.R. ed. 2002, Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of PeterLombard, Leiden: Brill. ℵ

[95] COMMBASE: An Electronic Database of Medieval Commentatorshttp://www.ou.edu/class/med-sci/Commbase.htm

2.3.2 Text

[96] Achard of St-Victoire, De discretione animae et spiritus et mentis, ed.N.M. Haering, in Mediaeval Studies 22, 1960, pp.174-191. +

[97] Adelard of Bath, De eodem et diverso, Quaestiones naturales, De avibustractatus, ed. C. Burnett, Cambridge Medieval Classics, Cambridge,1998. +

[98] Aegidius Romanus, Errores Philosophorum, ed. J. Koch, and Englishtranslation J.O. Riedl, Milwaukee, 1944. +

10


[99] —–, De plurificatione intellectus possibilis, ed. H.Bullotta Barracco.Roma, 1957. ℵ

[100] —–, Aegidii Romani Opera Omnia. III,2. Reportatio Lecturae super libros I-IV Sententiarum. Reportatio Monacensis. Excerpta Godefridi de Fontibus.A cura di C. Luna, Florence, SISMEL - Edizioni del Galluzzo (CorpusPhilosophorum Medii Aevii. Testi e Studi, 17), 2003. ℵ

[101] —–, la question sur l’unite de l’intellect dans Reportatio Lecturae, in[303] +

[102] Ailred of Rievaulx, De anima, ed. C.H.Talbot, Mediaeval and Renais-sance Studies, Supplement I, Loncon, 1952. @

[103] Alanus ab Insulis, Regulae caelestis iuris, ed. N.M. Haring, in Archivesd’histoire doctrinale et litteraire du Moyen Age 48 (1981). pp.121-226. +

[104] Alain of Lille, Quinque sunt digressiones cogitationis, ed. M.-T.d’Alverny, in Alain de Lille. Textes inedits, Paris, 1965, pp.313-317.+

[105] —–, De planctu Naturae, ed. N. Haring, Studi Medievali 3rd series 19(1978), pp.797-879. ℵ

[106] Albertus Magnus, Opera Omnia, ed. A. Borgnet, 38 vols. Paris, 1890-1899. +

[107] —–, De sensu, De memoria, De somno, De spiritu, De motibus ani., Deintellectu vol.9. +

[108] —–, De homine, vol.35. +

[109] —–, Uber den Menschen, [108] ubersetzt von H. Anzulewicz et J.R.Soder, Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2004 (PhB 531). @

[110] Albertus Magnus, Opera omnia ... curavit Institutum Alberti MagniColoniense ..., Munster, 1951- +

11


[111] —–, De anima, vol.7 +

[112] —–, De natura et origine animae, Quaestiones super de animalibus, vol.12+

[113] —–, De unitate, De XV problematibus, vol.17.1 +

[114] Albert von Orlamunde, Philosophia pauperum, part. ed. B. Geyer, inBeitrage zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, Bd.35, Heft 1,Munster, 1938, pp.1*-82*. +

[115] Alexander of Hales, Glossa in quatuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lom-bardi, 4 vols, Quaracchi, 1951-1957. +

[116] Alexander of Hales, et al., Summa theologia seu sic ab origine dicta“Summa fratris Alexandri”, 4 vols, Quaracchi, 1024-1948. @

[117] Alexander Neckam, Speculum speculationum, ed. R.M. Thomson,Oxford-Newyork, 1988. @

[118] Alfred of Shareshill (Alfredus Anglicus), De motu cordis, ed. C.Baeumker, Beitrage zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters,Bd.35, Heft 1-2, Munster, 1923. +

[119] Anonymous (Bazan), Quaestiones de anima, ed. B.C. Bazan, in Troiscommentaires anonymes sur le traite de l’ame d’Aristote, ed. B. Bazan, M.Giele et F. Van Steenberghen, Louvain-Paris, 1971, pp.351-517. +

[120] Anonymous (Bazan 1998), Sententia super II et III de anima, ed. B.C.Bazan et K. White, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1998. @

[121] Anonymous (Callus), De potentiis animae et objectis, ed. D.A. Callus,in ‘The power of the Soul. An Early Unpublished Text’, Recherches detheologie ancienne et medievale 19, 1952, pp.146-170. +?

[122] Anonymous (d’Alverny), Peregrinationes, ed. M.-T. d’Alverny, ‘LesPeregrinations de l’ame dans l’autre monde d’apres un anonyme de

12


la fin du XIIe siecle’, in Archives d’histoire doctrinale et litteraire dumoyen age 13 (1943), pp.239-299. +

[123] Anonymous (de Vaux), De causis primis et secundis et de fluxu quiconsequitur eas, ed. R. de Vaux, in Notes et textes sur l’avicennisme latin,Paris, 1934, pp.88-140. +

[124] Anonymous (Gauthier), De anima et de potentiis eius, ed. R.A. Gau-thier, in ‘Le Traite De anima et de potenciis eius d’un maıtre es arts(vers 1225)’, Revue des sciences philosophiques et theologiques 66 (1982),pp.27-55. +

[125] Anonymous (Gauthier 1985), Lectura in librum de anima a quo-dam discipulo reportata (Ms. Rom. Naz VE 828), ed. R.A. Gauthier,Grottaferrata-Rome, 1985. ℵ

[126] Anonymous (Giele), Quaestiones de anima, ed. M. Giele, in Trois com-mentaires anonymes sur le traite de l’ame d’Aristote, ed. B. Bazan, M.Giele et F. Van Steenberghen, Louvain-Paris, 1971, pp.13-120. +

[127] Anonymous (MS Siena), Quoaestiones super librum de anima, ed. M.Garadinali, in ‘Da Avicenne ad Averroe: “Quaestiones super librumde Anima”, Oxford 1250 ca. (ms. Siena Com. L.III.21)’, in Rivista distoria della filosofia 47 (1992), pp.375-407. @

[128] Anonymous (Van Steenberghen), Quaestiones de anima, ed. F. VanSteenberghen, in Trois commentaires anonymes sur le traite de l’amed’Aristote, ed. B. Bazan, M. Giele et F. Van Steenberghen, Louvain-Paris, 1971, pp.123-248. +

[129] Anonymous (Vennebusch), Quaestiones in tres libros de anima, ed. J.Vennebusch, Ein anonymer Aristoteleskommentar des XIII. Jahrhunderts,Paderborn, 1963. +

[130] Ps.- Augustinus, De spiritu et anima, Patrologia Latina 40, Paris, 1887,pp.779-832. ?

13


[131] Bartholomaeus Anglicus, De proprietatibus rerum libri III et IV, ed. R.J.Long, Toronto, 1979. @

[132] Bartholomaeus de Bononia, “Tractatus de luce Fr. Bartholomaei deBononia”, ed. I. Squadrani, in Antonianum 7 (1932), pp.201-38, 465-494. @

[133] Ps- Bede, De mundi celestis terrestrisque constitutione, ed. C. Burnett,Warburg Institute Surveys and Texts 10, London, 1985. +

[134] Bernardus of Trilia, Quaestiones disputatae de cognitione animae sepa-ratae, ed. P. Kunzle, Bern, 1969.

[135] Boethius of Dacia, Corpus Philosophorum Danicorum Medii Aevi,Copenhagen: vols. IV,1 (1969); V,1 (1972); V,2 (1974); VI,1 (1976);VI,2 (1976); VIII (1979). +

[136] Bonaventura, Doctoris Seraphici S. Bonventurae ... opera omnia, 10 vols,Quaracchi, 1882-1902. + [partial]

[137] F : S. B B (-, , , )http://www.franciscan-archive.org/bonaventura/index.html

[138] Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis, ed. Denifle, H. Denifle, etChatelain, A. Bruxelles : Culture et Civilisation, 2 vols. 1964 (Orig.Paris, 1899-97). +

[139] Dominicus Gundissalinus, De unitate, ed. P. Correns, in “Die demBoethius falschlich zugeschriebene Abhandlung des DominicusGundisalvi De unitate”, Beitrage zur Geschichte der Philosophie desmittelalters, Bd.1, Munster, 1891. +

[140] —–, De divisione philosophiae, ed. L. Baur, in Beitrage zur Geschichte derPhilosophie des mittelalters, Bd.4, Heft 2-3, Munster, 1903. +

14


[141] —–, De processione mundi, ed. G. Bulow, in “Des DominicusGundissalinus Schrift “Vom dem Hervorgange der Welt””, Beitragezur Geschichte der Philosophie des mittelalters, Bd.24, Heft 3, Munster,1925. +

[142] —–, Liber de anima, ed. J.T. Muckle, in Mediaeval Studies 2 (1940),pp.23-103. +

[143] Dietrich of Freiberg, Opera omnia, 4 vols., ed. K. Flasch, Hamburg:Meiner. +?

[144] Gilbertus Porretanus, Liber de sex principiis, ed. D. Van den Eynde,Monasterii Westfalorum: Aschendorff, 1953. +

[145] Glossa ordinaria, ed. J.-P. Migne, in Patrologia latina 144, Paris, 1853. +

[146] Godefridus de Font., Les Quodlibet Cinq, Six, et Sept, in M. de Wulf etJ. Hoffmans, eds., Les Philosophes Belge 3, Louvain. 1914. +

[147] Gonsalvus de Vallebona, Quaestiones disputatae et de quodlibet, ed. L.Amoros, Bibliotheca franciscana scholastica medii aevi 9, Florence, 1935.

+

[148] Henry Bate of Malines, Speculum divinorum et quorundam naturalium,vol.1-2 ed. E. Van de Vyver, Louvain/Paris, 1960. 1967. +

[149] —–, On the nature of matter. on the intellect as form of man, ed. by C.Steel, Leuven University Press, 1993. (Ancient and medieval philos-ophy/De Wulf-Mansion Centre; Series 1; 9. Speculum divinorum etquorundam naturalium pts. 4-5). @

[150] —–, On the unity of intellect. On the Platonic doctrine of the ideas, ed. byC. Steel, E. Van de Vyver. Leuven University Press, 1994. (Ancientand medieval philosophy/De Wulf-Mansion Centre; Series 1; 10.Speculum divinorum et quorundam naturalium pts. 6-7). @

15


[151] —–, On platonic philosophy, ed. by H. Boese; with an introductionand an analysis by C. Steel. Leuven University Press , 1990. (Ancientand medieval philosophy/De Wulf-Mansion Centre; Series 1; 12.Speculum divinorum et quorundam naturalium pts. 11-12). @

[152] —–, On thinking and happiness, ed. by G. Guldentops. Leuven Uni-versity Press, 2002. (Ancient and medieval philosophy/De Wulf-Mansion Centre; ser. 1; 21. Speculum divinorum et quorundam natu-ralium pts 13-16). @

[153] —–, On the heavens, the divine movers, and the first intellect, ed. by C.Steel, G. Guldentops. Leuven University Press, 1996. (Ancient andmedieval philosophy/De Wulf-Mansion Centre; ser. 1; 23. Speculumdivinorum et quorundam naturalium; pts 20-23). +

[154] Henry of Ghent, Henrici de Gandavo Opera Omnia, ed. R. Macken, etal., Louvain, 1983. +

[155] —–, Summae Quaestionum Ordinarium, Paris, 1520 (repr. FranciscanInstitute Publications, 1953, 2 vols). ℵ

[156] —–, Quodlibeta magistri Henrici Goethals a Gandavo doctoris solemnis,Paris, 1518 (repr. Bibliotheque S.J de Louvain, 1961, 2vols). ℵ

[157] Ps.- Henricus Gandaviensis, Quoaestiones in librum de causis, ed. J.P.Zwaenepoel, Louvain, 1974. ℵ

[158] Hermann of Carinthia, De essentiis, ed. C. Burnett, Leiden, 1982. +

[159] Ps.- Hugh of St-Cher (Hugo de S. Caro), De anima, ed. O. Lottin,“Un petit traite de l’ame de Hugues de Saint-Cher”, in Revue Neo-Scholastique de Philosophie 34 (1932), pp.468-475. ℵ

[160] Hugh of St-Victoir (Hugo de S. Victore), De unione spiritus et corporis,ed. A. M. Piazzoni, in Studi medievali, serie terza 21, 2, 1980, pp.861-888. ℵ

16


[161] Iohannes de Mechilinia, Tractatus de homine, ed. A. Pattin, Leuven,1977. ℵ

[162] Isaac de Stella, Epistola de anima, ed. J.-P. Migne, in Patrologia latina190, paris, 1893, cols. 1875-1890. ℵ

[163] Jean de Jandun, Ioannis de Ianduno philosophi acutissimi super librosAristotelis de anima subtilissimae quaestiones, Venetia, 1587 (repr. Frank-furt a M: Minerva, 1966).

ℵ [+?]

[164] Jean de la Rochelle (Iohannes de Rupella), Tractatus de divisione mul-tiplici potentiarum animae, ed. P. Michaud-Quantin, Paris, 1964. +

[165] —–, Summa de anima, ed. J.G. Bougerol, Paris, 1995. +

[166] John Blund, Tractatus de anima, ed. D.A. Callus et R.W. Hunt, London,1970. @

[167] John Pecham, Tractatus de anima, ed. G. Melani, Biblioteca di studifrancescani 1, Florence, 1948. @

[168] —–, Quaestiones tractantes de anima, ed. H. Spettmann, in Beitrage zurGeschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, Bd.19, Hefte 5-6, Munster,1918, +

[169] —–, Tractatus de perspectiva, ed. D.C. Lindberg, New York, 1972. @

[170] Matthew of Aquasparta, Quaestiones disputatae selectae de fide et de cog-nitione, Bibliotheca franciscana scholastica medii aevi 1, Quaracchi,1903. +

[171] —–, Quaestiones disputatae de anima XIII, ed. A.-J. Gondras, Paris,1961. @

[172] Petrus Aureoli, Scriptum super I Sententiarum, ed. E. Buytaert, Lou-vain/Paderborn, 1952-1956. +

17


[173] Petrus de Hibernia, Expositio et quaestiones in Aristotelis li-brum de longitudine et brevitate vitae, ed. M. Dunne, Louvain-la-Neuve/Louvain/Paris, 1993. +

[174] Petrus Hispanus, Scientia libri de anima, ed. M.A. Alonso, Madrid,1941. ℵ

[175] —–, Commentum in librum de anima, in Pedro Hispano Obras filosoficasII, ed. M.A. Alonso, Madrid: Istituto de filosofia “Luis Vives” 1944(=Quaestiones libri de anima). [questions concerning De anima bk.Iand II] +

[176] Ps.- Petrus Hispanus, Expositio libri de anima, in Pedro Hispano ObrasFilosoficas III. ed. M.A. Alonso, Madrid: Istituto de filosofia “LuisVives” 1952. @

[177] Philip of Chancellor, Summa de bono, ed. N. Wicki, 2 vols, Bern, 1985.ℵ [?]

[178] Pietro d’Abano, Conciliator controversiarum quae inter philosophos etversantur, Venice, 1565 (repr. Padua, 1985). +

[179] Petrus Lombardus, Sententiae in IV libris distinctae, ed. PP. Collegii, S.Bonaventurae Ad Claras Aquas, t.1 (libri I-II), t.2 (libri III-IV), Roma:Grottaferrata, 1971, 1981. @

[180] Robert Grosseteste, De artibus liberalibus, de generatione sonorum...[etc.] ... Summa philosophiae, ed. L. Baur, in “Die philosophischenWerke des Robert Grosseteste, Bischofs von Loncoln”, Beitrage zurGeschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, Bd.9, Munster, 1912, pp.1-643. @

[181] —–, Commentarius in divinis nominibus, ed. F. Ruello, in “La DivinorumNominum Resurrectio selon Robert Grosseteste et Albert le Grand”,Archives d’historire doctrinale et litteraire du moyen age 34 (1959), pp.99-197. +

18


[182] —–, Ex rerum initiatarum, ed. S. Gieben, in “Robert Grosseteste onPreaching. With the Edition of the Sermon Ex Rerum Initiatarum onRedemption”, Collectanea Franciscana 37 (1967), pp.100-141. +

[183] —–, De confessione, ed. S. Wenzel, in “Robert Grosseteste’s Treatiseon Confession “Deus est””, Franciscan Studies 30 (1970), pp.218-293.

+

[184] —–, Commentarius in posteriorum analyticorum libros, ed. P. Rossi, Flo-rence, 1981. +

[185] —–, Hexaemeron, ed. R.C. Dales et J. McEvoy, in Recherches de th’eologieancienne et medievale 47 (1980), pp.169-187. @

[186] —–, Expositio in epistolam sancti Pauli ad Galatas, ed. J. McEvoy, Turn-hout, 1995. +

[187] Ps.- Robert Grosseteste, De anima, ed. L. Baur, in Beitrage zurGeschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, Bd.9, Munster, 1912, pp.242-274. @

[188] Radulphus Brito, Quaestiones in Aristotelis librum tertium De anima,ed. W. Fauser, in Der Kommentar des Radulphus Brito zu Buch III Deanima, kritische Edition und philosophisch-historische Einleitung,Munster: W., Aschendorff, 1974. +

[189] U (R B)http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pecia/index.htm

[190] Robert Kilwardby, De spiritu fantastico, ed. P.O. Lewry, in Robert Kil-wardby: On Time and Imagination, Auctores Britanici Medii Aevi 9,Oxford, 1987, pp.45-130. +

[191] —-, Quaestiones in librum Sententiarum. 4 vols. ed. R. Schenk etal., Munchen: Verlag. der Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften.1986-1993. @ [ℵ=t.4]

19


[192] Roger Bacon, Opera hactenus inedita, I. Opus Tertium, II. Opus minus,III. Compendium philosophiae, ed. J.S. Brewer, London, 1859. + [?]

[193] —–, Opus maius, ed. J.H. Bridges, 3 vols, Oxford, 1897-1900. +

[194] —–, De multiplicatione specierum, ed. D.C. Lindberg, NewYork/Oxford, 1983. +

[195] Roger Marston, Quaestiones disputatae de emanatione aeterna, de statunaturae lapsae et de anima, Bibliotheca franciscana scholastica mediiaevi 7, Florence, 1932. +

[196] Roland of Cremona, Summae Magistri Rolandi Cremonensis O.P. Libertercius. Editio princeps ex membranaceis codicibus ..., ed. A. Cortesi,Monumenta Bergomensia 7, Bergamo, 1962. ℵ

[197] Siger of Brabant,S B

http://mapageweb.umontreal.ca/pironetf/

[198] —–, Quaestiones in tertium de anima. De anima intellectiva, ed. B.C.Bazan, in Siger de Brabant, Quaestiones in tertium de anima, De animaintellectiva, De aeternitate mundi. Louvain/Paris, 1972, pp.1-69. 70-112.

+

[199] —–, Quaestiones super librum De causis, ed. A. Marlasca, Lou-vain/Paris, 1972. +

[200] —–, Sophisma Omnis homo de necessitate est animal. Questio utrum haecsit vera: homo est animal, nullo homine existene, ed. B.C. Bazan, in Sigerde Brabant, Ecrits de logique, de morale et de physique. Louvain/Paris,1974, pp.43-52, 53-59. +

[201] Simon of Faversham, Quaestiones super tertium de anima, ed. D. Sharp,in Archives d’histoire doctrinale et litteraire du moyen age 9 (1934), pp.307-368. +

20


[202] Thomas Aquinas, Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P.M. edita, Roma,1882-. +

[203] —–, Sentencia libri de anima, ed. R.A. Gauthier, tom.XLV. +

[204] —–, De unitate intellectus contra averroistas, ed. H.F. Dondaine,tom.ILIII, (preface) pp.247-287, (texts) pp.291-314. +

[205] —–, Quaestio disputata de anima, ed. B.C. Baza, ntom.XXIV. +

[206] Thomas of Cantimpre, Liber de natura rerum, ed. H. Boese, Berlin/NewYork, 1973. @

[207] Ulrich of Strassburg, De summo bono, Liber I, ed. B. Mojsisch, Corpusphilosophorum teutonicorum medii aevi 1, Hamburg, 1989. +

[208] Vincent of Beauvais, Speculum quadruplex, naturale, doctrinale, morale,historiale 4 vols, Douai, 1624 (repr. Graz, 1964-1965). @

[209] Vital du Four, Quaestiones disputatae, ed. F. Delorme, in Archivesd’histoire doctrinale et litteraire du moyen age 2 (1927), pp.156-337. +

[210] Walter Burley, De sensibus, ed. H. Shapiro et F. Scott, Mitteilungendes Grabman-Instituts der Universitat Munchen, vol. 13, Munchen,1966. ℵ

[211] —–, De potentiis animae, in “The ‘De potentiis animae’ of WalterBurley”, ed. M.J. Kitchel, Mediaeval Studies 33 (1971), pp.85-113. +

[212] —–, Questions on the De anima of Aristotle, by Adam Burley and WalterBur ley, ed. E.A. Synan. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1997. +

[213] William of Auvergne, Opera omnia, 2 vols, ed. F. Hotot. with Supple-mentum, ed. B. Le Feron, Orleans/Paris, 1674 (repr. Frankfurt a. M.:Minerva, 1963). @

[214] —–, De immortalitate, ed. G. Bulow, in “Des Dominicus GundissalinusSchrift von der Unsterblichkeit der Seele ...”, in Beitrage zur Geschichteder Philosophie des Mittelalters, Bd.2, Heft 3, Munster, 1897. +

21


[215] —–, De Trinitate, ed. B. Switalski, Tronto, 1976. +

[216] —–, English translation of [215], R.J. Teske, et F.C. Wade, The trinity,or the first principle, Marquette University Press, 1989. @

[217] —–, De l’ame (VII, 1-9), introduction, traduction et notes par J.-B.Brenet, Paris: Vrin, 1998. @

[218] —–, Galle, G. 2000. “A comprehensive bibliography on Peter of Au-vergne”, Bulletin de philosophie medievale, 43 (2000), pp.53-79. @

[219] William of Auxerre, Summa aurea, ed. J. Ribaillier, 7 vols, Grottafer-rata, 1980-1987. +

[220] William of Conches, Philosophia, ed. G. Maurach et H. Telle, Pretoria,1980. ? [@ ed.1974]

[221] —–, Dragmaticon (Dialogus de substantiis physicis), ed G. Gratarolus,Straßburg, 1567, ? [@ ed.1997]

[222] William of St-Thierry (Guillelmus de S.Theodorico), De natura cor-poris et animae, ed. et tr. M. Lemoine, Paris, 1988. +

[223] Witelo, De causa primaria poenitentiae in hominibus et de natura dae-monum, ed. G. Burchardt, in Studia Copernicana 19, Warsaw, 1979,pp.155-208. ℵ

[224] —–, Perspectivae, ed. S. Unguru, et al. in Studia Copernicana 15 (v.1).23 (v.5). 28 (v.2 et 3), Warsaw, 1983. @ [? v.4]

[225] —–, Perspectiva, ed. et trans. S. Unguru, in “Witelo as a Mathemati-cian: A Study in XIIIth Century Mathematics Including a CriticalEditon and English Translation of the Mathematical Book of Witelo’sPerspectiva”, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1970. ℵ

22


3 Secondary

3.1 Over View

[226] de Libera, A. 1996. La querelle des universaux. De Platon a la fin duMoyen Age, Paris: Editions du Seuil. +

[227] Nardi, B. 1952. Ogetto et sogetto nella filosofia antica e medievale, Roma.ℵ

[228] Hamesse, J. et Steel, C. eds. 2000. L’Elaboration du vocabulairephilosophique au Moyen Age. Actes du Colloque international deLouvain-la-Neuve et Leuven, 12-14 septembre 1998, organise parla SIEPM, Turnhort: Brepols. @

3.2 Aristotele and Late Antiquity

*provisional

[229] Arzen, R. 1998. Aristoteles’ De anima, eine verlorene spatantike Para-phrase in Arabischer und Persischer Uberlieferung, Leiden/New York:Brill. +

[230] Blumenthal, H.J, 1996. Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity,Ithaca: Cornell UP. +

[231] Gersh, S. 1986, Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism. The Latin Traditon.I (Medieval Studies 23), Notre Dame (Indiana). +

[232] Kamp, A. 2001. Philosophiehistorie als Rezeptionsgeschichte: die Reaktionauf Aristoteles’ De Anima-Noetik : der fruhe Hellenismus, Amsterdam:B.R. Gruner. +

[233] Mahoney, E.P. 1973. “Themistius and the Agent Intellect in James ofViterbo and Other Thirteenth Century Philosophers (Saint Thomas,

23


Siger of Brabant and Henry Bate)”, in Augustiniana 23 (1973). pp.422-467. @

[234] Merlan P. 1963, Monopsychism, Mysticism, Metaconsciousness. Problemsof the Soul in the Neoaristotelian and Neoplatonic Tradition, La Haye:Nijhoff. @

[235] Moraux, P. 1942, Alexandre d’Aphrodise exegete de la noetique d’Aristote(Bibliotheque de la faculte philosophie et lettres de l’Universite deLiege, fasc.XCIX), Liege: Faculte de philosophie - Paris: E. Droz. @

[236] Moraux, P. 1978. “Le De anima dans la tradition grecque. Quelquesaspects de l’interpretation du traite, de Theophraste a Themistius”,in G.E.R. Lloyd et G.E.L. Owen, eds. Arsitotle on Mind and the Senses,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.281-324. @

[237] Moraux, P. hrsg. von Wiesner, J. 2001. Alexander von Aphrodisias.Berlin: W. de Gruyter. @

[238] Nusbaum, M.C., Rorty, A.O., eds. 1992. Essays on Aristotle’s ‘De an-ima’, Oxford: Clarendon Press. @

[239] Papadis, D. 1991. Die Seelenlehre bei Alexander von AphrodisiasBern/New York: P. Lang. +

[240] Sorabji, R. ed. 1990. Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentatorsand their Influence, London: Duckworth, 1990. +

[241] Stratton, G.M, 1917. Theophrastus and the Greek Physiological Psychol-ogy before Aristotle, London (repr. Chicago, 1967). +

[242] Thillet, P. 1981. “Materialisme et theorie de l’ame et de l’intellectchez Alexandre d’Aphrodise”, Revue philosophique de la France et del’etranger 106 (1981), pp.5-24. +

24


3.3 The Avicennism

3.3.1 Avicenna

[243] Amid, M. Essai sur la psychologie d’Avicenne, Geneve: Kundig. ℵ

[244] Psychologie d’Ibn Sina (Avicenne) d’apres son oeuvre as-Sifa, ed. J. Bakos.Prague: De L’Academie Tchecoslovaque des Sciences. @

[245] Gutas, D. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition, Leiden: Brill. +

[246] Davidson, H.A. 1992. Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes, on Intellect.New York: Oxford University Press. +

[247] Duart, Th.-A. 2000. “The Human Soul’s Individuation and its Sur-vival after the Body’s Death: Avicenna on the Causal Relation be-tween Body and Soul”, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 10, pp.259-274.

@

[248] Goichon, A.M. 1937. La distinction de l’essence et de l’existence d’apresIbn Sına (Avicenne), Paris: Desclee de Brouwer. @

[249] Goichon, A.M. 1938. Lexique de la langue philosophique d’Ibn Sina (Avi-cenne), Paris : Desclee de Brouwer. @

[250] Goichon, A.M. 1939. Vocabulaires compares d’Aristote et d’Ibn Sına,Paris: Desclees de Brouwer. @

[251] Hasse, D.N. “Avicenna on Abstraction”, in R. Wisnovsky, ed., Aspectsof Avicenna, NJ: Markus Wiener Publishers, pp.39-72.

@

[252] Janssens, J.L. et al. eds. 2002. Avicenna and His Heritage: Acts ofthe International Colloquium Leuven-Louvain-La-Neuve, September 8-September 11, 1999, Louvain: Louvain UP. @

[253] Michot, J. 1986. La destinee de l’homme selon Avicenne, Louvain:Peeters. +

25


[254] Sebti, M. 2000. Avicenne. L’Ame humaine, Paris: PUF. +

[255] Verbeke, G. 1968-1972. “Introduction sur la doctrine psychologiqued’Avicenne”. in [79] 1: 1*-90*, 2: 1*-73*. +

3.3.2 Avicenna Latinus

[256] Gilson, E. 1926, “Pourquoi saint Thomas a critique saint Augustin”,in Archives d’histoire doctorinale et litteraire du moyen age 1 (1926), pp.89-121. +

[257] Gilson, E. 1929. “Les sources greco-arabes de l’augustinisme avicen-nisant”, in Archives d’histoire doctorinale et litteraire du moyen age 4(1929), pp.5-149. +

[258] Gilson, E. 1960, “Avicenne en occident au moyen age”, in Archivesd’histoire doctorinale et litteraire du moyen age 36 (1960) pp.89-121. +

[259] Goichon, A.M, 1979. La philosophie d’Avicenna et son influence en Europemedievale, Paris, 1944 (2e, rev. ed. 1979). ℵ

[260] Hasse, D.N. 1999. “Das Lehrstuck von den vier Intellecten in derScholastik: von den Arabischen Quellen bis zu Albertus Magnus”,in Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales 66 (1999), pp.21-77.

@

[261] Hasse, D.N. 2000. Avicenna’s De anima in the Latin West. London: TheWarburg Institute. @

[262] Jolivet, J. 1977. “Intellect et Intelligence. Note sur la tradition arabo-latine des XIIe et XIIIe siecles”, in Melanges offerts a Henry Corbin,Institute of Islamic Studies, Mcgill Unversity, Tehran Branch, Tehran(repr. in J. Jolivet, 1995, Philosophie medievale arabe et latine, Paris: Vrin.

+

[263] de Vaux, R. 1934. Notes et textes sur l’avicennisme latin aux confins desXIIe et XIIIe siecles, Paris. +

26


3.4 The Averroism

3.4.1 Averroes

[264] Abousenna, M, et Wahba, M, eds. 1996. Averroes and the Enlighten-ment, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Bools. @

[265] Arnaldez, Roger. 1998. Averroes: A Rationalist in Islam, tr. D. Streight.Notre Dame: Univ. of Notre Dame Press. @

[266] Baffioni, C. 2004. Averroes and the Aristotelian Heritage. Naples. ℵ

[267] Bazan, B.C. 1972a. “La noetica de Averroes (1126-1198)”, Philosophia38 (1972), pp.19-49. @

[268] Black, D.L. 1996, “Memory, Time and Individuals in Averroes’s Psy-chology”, Medieval Theology and Philosophy 5 (1996), pp.161-187. @

[269] Black, D.L.“Conjunction and the Identity of Knower and Known inAverroes”. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 73 (1999), pp.159-184. @

[270] Davidson, H.A. “Averroes on the Material Intellect”. Viator 17 (1986),pp.91-137. @

[271] Duart, T.-A. “Averroes: The Commentator and the Commentators”,in L.P. Schrenk, ed. Aristotle in Late Antiquity, Washington, DC,pp.184-202. +

[272] Endress, G. et Aersten, A. 1999. Averroes and the Aristotelian Tradition.Sources, Constitution and Reception of the Philosophy of Ibn Rushd (1126-1198). Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium Averroicum (Cologne,1996). (Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science 31). Leiden: Brill.

+

[273] Fakhry, M. 2001, Averroes: His Life, Works, and Influence, Oxford:Oneworld. ℵ

27


[274] Hyman, A. 1981. “Aristotle’s Theory of the Intellect and its Interpre-tation by Averroes”. in D.J. O’Meara, ed., Studies in Aristotle (Studiesin Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 9). Washington, 1981.pp.161-191. @

[275] Ivry, A. 1966. “Averroes on Intellection and Conjunction”, Journal ofthe American Oriental Society 86 (1966), pp.76-85. @

[276] Ivry, A. 1972. “Towards a Unified View of Averroes’s Philosophy”,in Philosophical Forum 4 (1972), pp.87-113. @

[277] Kogan, B. 1985. Averroes and the Metaphysics of causation, Albany:SUNY press. +

[278] Leaman, O. 1998. Averroes and His Philosophy Rev. ed., Oxford. +

[279] de Libera, A. 2000. “Pour Averroes”, Introduction a Averroes. L’islamet la raison. Anthologie de textes juridiques, theologiques et polemiques.Traduction de M. Geoffroy, Paris: Flammarion (GF. 1132). pp.9-76.@

[280] Taylor, R.C. 1998a. “Averroes on Psychology and the Principles ofMetaphysics”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 36.4 (1998), pp.507-523. +

[281] Taylor, R.C. 1998b. “Personal Immortality in Averroes’ Mature Philo-sophical Psychology”, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica me-dievale 9 (1998), pp.87-110. @

[282] Taylor, R.C. 2000. “Cogitatio, Cogitatives, and Cogitare: Remarks onthe Cogitative Power in Averroes”, in [228], pp.111-145. @

[283] Taylor, R.C. 2004. “Separate Material Intellect in Averroes’ MaturePhilosophy”, in R. Arnzen et J. Thielmann. Words, Texts and ConceptsCruising the Mediterranean Sea. Studies on the sources, contents andinfluences of Islamic civilization and Arabic philosophy and science,dedicated to Gerhard Endress on his sixty-fifth birthday. Leuven,pp.289-309. @

28


[284] Urvoy, D. 1991. Ibn Rushd (Averroes), tr. by O. Stewart.London/NewYork: Routledge. +

[285] Wolfson, H.A. 1961. “The Twice-Revealed Averroes”. Speculum 36(1961), pp.373-392. +

3.4.2 Averroes Latinus

[286] Bazan, B.C. 1989. “On ‘First Averroism’ and its Doctrinal Back-ground”. in: Of Scholars, Savants, and their Texts. Studies in Philosophyand Religious Thought. Essays in Honor of Arthur Hyman. R. Link-Salinger. ed., New York [etc.]. pp.9-22. @

[287] Bazan, B.C. 2000. “Was there ever a ‘First Averroism’?”. In J.A. Aert-sen, ed., Geistesleben im 13. Jahrhundert. (Miscellanea Mediaevalia 27).Berlin/New York. +

[288] Bazzona, A. et Beriou, N. eds. 2005. Averroes et l’averroısm: un itinerairedu haut atlas a paris et a padoue, PU Lyon. ℵ

[289] Brenet, J.-B.. 2003. Transferts du sujet: la noetique d’Averroes selon Jeande Jandun. Paris: Vrin (Sic et Non). @

[290] Endress, G. et Aersten J.A. 1999. Averroes and the Aristotelian Tradition:sources, condition and reception of the philosophy of Ibn Rushd (1126-1198). Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium Averroicum (Cologne 1996).Leiden: Brill. +

[291] Gauthier, Leon. 1948. Ibn Rochd (Averroes), Paris: PUF, 1948. +

[292] Gauthier, R.A. 1948. “Trois Commentaires “Averroıstes” surl’Ethique a Nicomaque”, in Archives d’histoire doctorinale et litterairedu moyen age 22-23. pp.187-336. +

[293] Gauthier, R.A. 1982. “Notes sur les debuts (1225-1240) du premier«averroısme»”, in Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Theologiques66.3, pp.321-374. +

29


[294] Ghisalberti, A. et Federici Vescovini, G. 1996, “Aristotelismo e aver-roismo dalle arti alla teologia”, Storia della teologia nel Medioevo III,Casale Monferrato, pp.541-554. ℵ

[295] Hodl, L. 1972. “Uber die averroistische Wende der lateinischenPhilosophie des Mittelalters im 13. Jh.” in Rechercehes de theologieancienne et medievale 39 (1972), pp.171-204. @

[296] Kuksewicz, Z. 1968. De Siger de Brabant a Jacques de Plaisance. La theoriede l’intellect chez les averroıstes latines des XIIIe et XIVe siecles. Wrocłow:Ossolineum. +

[297] Kuksewicz, Z. 1995. “Der lateinische Averroismus im Mittelalter undin der Fruh-Renaissance”, in M.J.F.M. Hoenen, J.H.J. Schneider, G.Wieland, eds. Philosophy and Learning. Universities in the Middle Ages.Leiden/New York/Koln: E.J.Brill. pp.371-386. +

[298] Imbach, R. 1991. “L’averroısme latin du XIIIe siecle”, in Gli studidi filosofia medievale fra otto e novecento. Contributo a un bilancio sto-riografico. Atti del convegno internazionale (Roma, 21-23 settembre1989), a cura di R. Imbach e A. Maieru, Roma: Edizioni storia eLetteratura (Storia e Letteratura 179), pp.191-208. @

[299] Ivry, A. 1988. “Averroes and the West: The First En-counter/Nonencounter”, in R. Link-Salinger, et al., eds. A StraightPath. Studies in Philosophy and Culture in Honor of Arthur Hyman,Washington, D.C. pp.142-158. +

[300] de Libera, A. et Hayoun, M.-R. Averroes et L’averroısme, Paris: PUF,1991. @

[301] de Libera, A. 1994. “Averroısme ethique et philosophie mystique.De la felicite intellectuelle a la vie bienheureuse”. in: L. Bianchi, ed.Filosofia e Teologia nel Trecento, Louvain-la-Neuve. +

30


[302] de Libera, A. 1994a. ‘Existe-t-il une noetique “averroiste”? Notesur la reception latine d’Averroes au XIIIe et XIVe siecle”. in [306] ,pp.51-80. +

[303] Luna, C. 1999. “Quelques precisions chronologiques a propos de lacontroverse sur l’unite de l’intellect”, Revue des sciences philosophiqueset theologiques 83/4 (1999), pp.649-683. +

[304] McAleer, G.J. “Who Were the Averroists of the Thirteenth Century?A Study of Siger of Brabant and Neo-Augustinians in Respect of thePlurality Controversy”. Modern Schoolman 76 (1999), pp.273-292. +

[305] Nardi, B. 1960. Studi di Filosofia Medievale. Roma: Edizioni di Storia eLetteratura. +

[306] Niewohner, F. et Sturlese, L. 1994. Averroismus im Mittelalter und inder Renaissance. Zurich: Spur. +

[307] Sturlese, L. 1994. “L’averroismo nella cultura filosofica tedesca me-dievale”, in [306], pp.114-131. +

[308] de Vaux, R. 1933. “Le premiere entree d’Averroes chez les Latins”,Revue des sciences philosophiques et theologiques 22 (1933), pp.193-245.

@

[309] Wolfson, H. 1963. “Revised plan for the publication of corpus com-mentariorum Averroes in aristotelem”, Speculum 38 (1963), pp.88-104. +

3.5 The Condemnations 1270-1277

3.5.1 The Condemnations

[310] Aersten, J.A et Speer, A. 1998. Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter?,(Miscellanea Mediaevalia 26), Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. +

31


[311] Aersten, J.A., Emery K., Speer, A. eds. 2001. Nach der Verurteilung von1277. Philosophie und Theologie an der Universitat von Paris im letztenViertel des 13. Jahrhunderts. Studien unt Texte (Miscellanea Mediaevalia28), Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. +

[312] Bianchi, L. 1987, “La felicita intellectuale come professione nellaParigi del Duecento”, Rivista di Filisofia 78 (1987), pp.181-199. ℵ

[313] Bianchi, L. 1990. Il vescovo e I filosofi: la condanna parigina del 1277 el’evoluzione del aristotelismo scolastico, Bergamo: Lubrina. ℵ

[314] Bianchi, L. 1997. La filosofia nella Universita. Secoli XII-XIV, Firenze:La Nouova Itaria. ℵ

[315] Bianchi, L. 1999. Censure et liberte intellectuelle a l’universite de Paris(XIIIe-XIVe siecles), Paris: Les Belles Lettres. @

[316] Brady, I. 1970. “Background to the Condemnation of 1270: MasterWilliam of Baglione”, Franciscan Studies 30 (1970), pp.35-45. +

[317] Dales, R.C. “The Origin of the Doctrine of the Double Truth,” Viator15 (1984), pp.169-79. +

[318] Flasch, K. 1989. Aufklarung im Mittelalter? Die Verurteilung von 1277.Frankfurt. @

[319] Hissette, R. 1977. Enquete sur les 219 articles condamnes a Paris le 7 mars1277, Louvain/Paris: Naeuwelarts. +

[320] Hissette, R. 1982. “Albert le Grand et Thomas d’Aquin dans la cen-sure parisienne du 7 mars 1277.” In ed. A. Zimmermann, Studienzur mittelalterlichen Geistesgeschichte und ihren Quellen (MiscellaneaMediaevalia 15), Berlin, 1982. pp.229-237. +

[321] Hissette, R. 1997. “L’implication de Thomas d’Aquin dans les cen-sures parisiennes de 1277”, Recherches de philosophie ancienne etmedievale, 64.1 (1997). pp.3-31. @

32


[322] Hissete, R. 1998a. “Thomas d’Aquin compromis avec Gilles de Romeen mars 1277,” Revue d’Histoire Ecclesiastique, 93 (1998), pp.5-26. +

[323] Hissette, R. 1998b. “Roma. Thomas d’Aquin directement vise par lacensure du 7 mars 1277? Reponse a John F. Wippel,” in: J.Hamesse,ed., Magistra mundi. Itineraria culturae medievalis (Melanges L.E.Boyle), Louvain-La-Neuve, 1998, pp. 425-437. @

[324] de Libera, A. 1991. Penser au Moyen Age. Paris: Seul. +

[325] Luca, C. 1999. “Quelques precisions chronologiques a propos dela controverse sur l’unite de l’intellect”, in Revue des sciencesphilosophiques et theologiques 83.4 (1999), pp.649-683. @

[326] Normore, C.G., “Who Was Condemned in 1277?,” in The ModernSchoolman 72 (1995), pp.273-81. +

[327] Piche, D. 1999. La condamnation de 1277. Texte latin, traduction, intro-duction et commentaire, Paris: Vrin. @

[328] Putallaz, F.-X. 1995. Insolente liberte. Controverses et condamnations auXIIIe siecle, Fribourg: Editions Universitaires. +

[329] Thijssen, J.M.M.H. 1997. “1277 Revisited: A New Interpretationof the Doctorinal Investigations of Thomas Aquinas and Gilles ofRome”, Vivarium 35 (1997), pp.72-202. +

[330] Thijssen, J.M.M.H. 1998. Censure and Heresy at the University of Paris,1200-1400, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. @

[331] Trottmann, Ch. 1995. La Vision beatifique. Des disputes scolastiques a sadefinition par Benoıt XII, Roma: Bibliotheque de l’Ecole francaise deRome. @

[332] Wielockx, R. Aegidii Romani, Apologia, Florence, 1985. ℵ

33


[333] Wielockx, R. “Autour du proces de Thomas d’Aquin.” In ed. A.Zimmermann, Thomas von Aquin. Werk und Wirkung im Licht neurererForschungen (Miscellanea Mediaevalia 17), Berlin, 1988. pp.413-38. +

[334] Wielockx, R. “Procedures contre Giles de Rome et Thomas d’Aquin.Reponse a J.M.M.H. Thijssen,” Revue des sciences philosophiques ettheologiques, 83 (1999), pp.293-313. +

[335] Wielockx, R. “A Separate Process against Aquinas. A Response toJohn F. Wippel,” in J. Hamesse ed., Roma, Magistra mundi. Itenerariaculturae medievalis (Melanges L.E. Boyle), Louvain-La-Neuve, 1998,pp.1009-1030. +

[336] Wippel, J.F. 1977. “The Condemnations of 1270 and 1277 at Paris”,Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 7, pp.169-201. +

[337] Wippel, J.F. 1995. “Thomas Aquinas and the Condemnation of 1277”,The Modern Schoolman 72, pp.233-272. +

[338] Wippel, 1997. “Bishop Stephen Tempier and Thomas Aquinas: ASeparate Process Against Aquinas?” in Freiburger Zeitschrift furPhilosophie und Theologie, 44 (1997), pp.117-36. @

3.5.2 The Faculties

[339] Bazan, B.C, et al. 1985. Les questions disputees et les questionsquodlibetiques dans les facultes de Theologie, de Droit et de Medecine,nos.44-45 (1985). +

[340] Callus, D.A. 1943. “Introduction of Aristotelian Learning to Oxford”,in Proceedings of the British Academy 29 (1943), pp.229-281. +

[341] Glorieux, P. 1933. Repertoire des Maitres en theologie de Paris au XIIIe

siecle (Etudes de philosophie medievale, 17/18), Paris. +

34


[342] Glorieux, P. 1971. La Faculte des Arts et ses Maitres au XIIIe siecle (Etudesde philosophie medievale, 59), Paris: Vrin. +

[343] Hamesse, J. 1974. Les Auctoritates Aristotelis. Un froliege medieval.Etude historique et edition critique. Louvain/Paris, Publications uni-versitaires/Beatrice-Nauwelaerts (Philosophes Medievaux, 17). +

[344] Holtz, L. ed. 1997. L’Enseignement des disciplines a la Faculte des arts.Paris et Oxford, XIIIe et XIVe siecles (Studia Artistarum. Etudes sur laFaculte des arts dans les univesites medievales, 4), Turnhout: Bre-pols. @

[345] Lafleur, CL. Quatre introductions a la philosophie au XIIIe siecle: textescritiques et etude historique, Paris: Vrin. @

[346] Lafleur, CL. 1992. Le “Guide de l’etudiant” d’un maıtre anonyme de lafaculte des arts de Paris au XIIIe siecle (Publications du laboratioire dephilosophie ancienne et medievale de la faculte de l’universite Laval,I), Faculte de Philosophie, Universite Laval, Quebec. ℵ

[347] Lafleur, CL., et Carrier, J. 1997. L’Enseignement de la philosophie auXIIIe siecle. Autour du ‘Guide de l’etudiant’ du ms. Ripoll 109. Actes ducolloque international edites, avec un complement d’etudes et detextes, par CL. Lafleur, avec la collaboration de J. Carrier, Turnhout:Brepols (Studia Artistarum 5). @

[348] Weijers, O. 1994ff. Le travail intellectuel a la faculte des arts de Paris:textes et maıtres (ca. 1200-1500), Turnhout: Brepols. @

3.6 Siger de Brabantia

? vide [197]

[349] Bazan, B.C. 1972b, Introduction a [198]. +

35


[350] Bazan, B.C. 1981. “Intellectum Speculativum: Averroes, ThomasAquinas, and Siger of Brabant on the Intelligibile Object”. in Jornalof the History of Philosophy 19, pp.425-446. +

[351] Caparello, A. 1983. “Il De anima intellectiva di Sigieri di Brabante.Problemi cronologici e dottrinali”, Sapienza 36, pp.441-474. ℵ

[352] Da Palma, G. 1955. La dottrina sull’unita dell’intelletto in Sigieri diBrabante. Padova: Casa Editrice Doot. Antonio Milani, 1955. ℵ

[353] Dodd, T. 1998, The Life and Thought of Siger of Brabant, Thirteenth-Century Parisian Philosopher. An examination of his views on the Re-lationship of Philosophy and Theology, Lewiston (N.Y): Mellen Press,1998. ℵ

[354] Fioravanti, G. 1966. “Boezio di Dacia e la storiographiasull’averroismo”, Studia medievali 7, pp.283-322. ℵ

[355] Fioravanti, G. 1972. “Sull’evoluzione del monopsichismo di Sigieridi Brabante”, Atti della Accademia della Scienze di Tronto, Classe dellescienze morali, storiche e filologiche, 106 (1972), pp.407-464. ℵ

[356] Gauthier, R.-A. 1983. “Notes sur Siger de Brabant. 1. Siger en 1265”,Revue des sciences philosophiques et theologiques 67: pp.201-232. +

[357] Gauthier, R.-A. 1984. “Notes sur Siger de Brabant. 2. Siger en 1272-1275”, Revue des sciences philosophiques et theologiques 68: pp.3-50. +

[358] Klunker, W.-U. et Sandkuhler, B. 1988. Menschliche Seele und Kosmis-cher Geist: Siger von Brabant in der Auseinandersetzung mit ThomasAquinas. Stuttgart: Verlag Freies Geistesleben. @

[359] Nardi, B. 1945. Sigieri di Brabante nel pensiero del Rinascimento Italiano,Roma: Edizoni Italiane [contient le “Due opere sconosciute di Sigeridi Brabante”]. @

36


[360] Nardi, B. 1950. “L’anima umana secondo Sigieri”, Giornale critico dellafilosofia italiana 29, pp.317-325. @

[361] Putallaz, F.-X. 1992. “La connaissance de soi au Moyen Age: Siger deBrabant”, in Archives d’Histoire Doctorinale et Litteraire du Moyen Age59, pp.89-157. +

[362] Putallaz, F.-X. et Imbach, R. 1997. Profession Philosophe: Siger de Bra-bant, Paris: Cerf. ℵ

[363] Steel, C. 2001. “Siger of Brabant versus Thomas Aquinas on thePossibility of Knowing the Separate Substances”, in [311], pp.211-231.

[364] Van Steenbergen, F. 1977. Maıtre Siger de Brabant, Paris/Louvain. +

3.7 Albertus Magnus

[365] Anzulewicz, H. 2003. “Entwicklung und Stellung der Intellektheorieim System des Albertus Magnus”, in Archives d’Histoire Doctorinaleet Litteraire du Moyen Age 70, pp.165-218. +

[366] Baldner, S. 1996. “St. Albert the Great on the Union of the HumanSoul and Body”, in American Catholic Philosophical Quarterley 70,1,pp.103-120. @

[367] Hoenen, M.J.F.M et de Libera, A. 1995. Albertus Magnus und der Al-bertismus. Deutsche philosophische Kultur des Mittelalters, Leiden/NewYork/Koln: Brill, pp.107-131. +

[368] Creamer-Ruegenberg, I. 1980. “Die Seele als Form in einer Hierarchievon Formen. Beobachtung zu einem Lehrstuck aus der De anima-Paraphrase Alberts des Großen”, in [376], pp.59-88. +

[369] Creamer-Ruegenberg, I. 1981. “Alberts Seelen- und Intellektlehre”.in Miscellanea Mediaevalia 14, pp.104-115. +

37


[370] Dahnert, U. 1934. Die Erkenntnislehre des Albertus Magnus, Leibzig: S.Hirzel. +

[371] Dewan, L. 1996. “St. Albert, St. Thomas, and Knowledge”, in Ameri-can Catholic Philosophical Quarterley 70,1, pp.121-135. @

[372] Gilson, E. 1943. “L’Ame raisonnable chez Albert le Grand”, inArchives d’Histoire Doctorinale et Litteraire du Moyen Age 18, pp.5-72.+

[373] Kennedy, L.A. 1960. “The Nature of the Human Intellect accordingto St. Albert the Great”, in The Modern Schoolman, 37, pp.121-137. +

[374] de Libera, A. 1990. Albert Le Grand et La Philosophie. Paris: Vrin. +

[375] de Libera, A. 2005. Metaphysique et noetique Albert le Grand Paris: Vrin.@

[376] Meyer, G. et Z, A. eds. 1980. Albertus Magnus DoctorUniversalis 1280/1980. Mainz: Matthias-Grunewald. +

[377] Miller, R. 1954. “An Aspect of Averroes’ Influence on St. Albert”, inMediaeval Studies 16, pp.57-71. +

[378] Schneider, A. 1906. Die Psychologie Alberts des Grossen. Munster: As-chendorff. +

[379] Sturlese, L. 1993. Die deutshce Philosophie im Mittelalter. Munchen:C. H. Beck. orig. . Storia della filosofia tedesca nel medioevo. Firenze:Olschki. 1990. +

[380] Vernier J.M. 1992. “La Definition de l’ame chez Avicenne et s. Albertle Grand. Etude comparative du “Liber de anima” d’Avicenne et du“De anima” de s. Albert le Grand”, Revue des sciences philosophiqueset theologiques anciennes et medievales 76 (1992), pp.255-279. +

[381] W, E. 1994. “Les emprunts majeurs a Averroes chez Albert leGrand et dans son ecole”, in [306], pp.149-179. +

38


[382] Weisheipl, J.A. ed. 1980, Albertus Magnus and The Sciences. Commem-orative Essays 1980, Tronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

+

[383] Zimmermann, A. 1980. “Albertus Magnus und der lateinische Aver-roismus”, in [376], pp.465-494. +

3.8 Thomas Aquinas

[384] Bazan, B.C. 1985. “Le Commentaire de Saint Thomas d’Aquin surle traite de l’ame”, Revue des sciences philosophiques et theologiques 69(1985), pp.521-547. +

[385] Bazan, B.C. 1997. “The human soul: form and substance? ThomasAquinas’ Critique of eclectic Aristotelianism”, in Archives d’HistoireDoctorinale et Litteraire du Moyen Age 64, pp.95-126. +

[386] Black, D. 1996. “Consciousness and Self-Knowledge in Aquinas’sCritique of Averroes’s Psychology”, in Journal of the History of Philos-ophy 31, pp.349-385. +

[387] Black, D.L.. “Models of the mind: Metaphysical presuppositions ofthe averroist and thomistic accounts of intellection”. Documenti estudi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 15 (2004), pp.319-352. @

[388] Flasche, K. 1995. “Die Seele im Feuer. Aristotelische Seelenlehreund augustinisch-gregorianische Eschatologie bei Albert von Koln,Thomas von Aquino, Siger von Brabant und Dietrich von Freiberg”,in M.J.F.M. Hoenen et A. de Libera eds. Albertus Magnus unde derAlbertismus. Deutsche philosophische Kultur des Mittelalters, Leiden[etc.]: Brill (Studien und Texte zur Gesisesgeschichte des Mittelalters,XLVIII), pp.107-131. +

[389] Gauthier, R.-A. 1984b. “Preface” a [203]. pp.1*-294*. +

39


[390] Gomez Nogales, S. 1976, “Saint Thomas, Averroes et l’averroısm”,in G. Verbeke, D. Verhelst, eds., Aquinas and the Problems of His Time,Louvain: Louvain UP. +

[391] de Libera, A. 2004. L’Unite de l’intellect de Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: J.Vrin. ℵ

[392] Festugiere, A.M.J. 1931. “La place du De anima dans le systemeAristotelicienne d’apres S.Thomas”. in Archives d’histoire doctrinaleet litteraire du moyen age 6 (1931), pp.25-47. +

[393] Mahoney E.P., 1994. “Aquinas’s Critique of Averroes’s Doctrine ofthe Unity of the Intellect”, in D.M. Gallagher, ed., Thomas Aquinasand His Legacy, Washington DC: The Catholic University of AmericaPress, pp.83-106. +

[394] Michaud-Quantin, P. 1971. “Les champs semantiques de ‘species’:Tradition latine et traductions du grec”. in id, Etudes sur le vocabulairephilosophique du moyen age. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo. pp.113-150.

+

[395] Nardi, B. 1938. S. Thommaso d’Aquino. Trattato sull’unita dell’intellettocontro gli Averroisti. Traduzione commento e introduzione storico. Firenze.

@

[396] Pegis, A. 1934. St. Thomas and the Problem of the Soul in the ThirteenthCentury. Tronto: PIMS. +

[397] Taylor, R.C. 1999. “Averroes’ Epistemology and its Critique byAquinas”, in Medieval Masters, R.E. Houser, ed. TX: Center forThomistic Studies. pp.147-177. @

[398] Verbeke, G. 1955, “Themistius et le De unitate intellectus de SaintThomas” in Revue Philosophique de Louvain 53 (1955), pp.141-164. +

40


[399] Weber, E.-H. 1998. “L’identite de l’intellect et de l’intelligible selon laversion latine d’Averroes et son interpretation par Thomas d’Aquin”.Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 8 (1998), pp.233-257. @

3.9 Aegidius Romanus etc.

*provisional

[400] Anzulewicz, H. 1972. “Eine weitetere Uberlieferung der Collectio er-rorum in Anglia et Parisius condemnatorum im Ms. lat. fol. 456 derStaatsbibliothek Preussischer Kulturbesitz zu Berlin,” Franziskanis-che Studien 74 (1992), pp.375-99. +

[401] Conti, A.D. “Intelletto ed astrazione nella teoria della conoscenza diEgidio Romano”, Beitrage zur Geschichte der Philosophie unt Theologiedes Mittelalters 95, pp.123-164. +

[402] Guldentops, G. et Steel, C. 2003. eds. Henry of Ghent and the Transfor-mation of Scholastic Thougt. Studies in memory of Jos Decorte, Leuven:Leuven University Press. @

[403] Hewson, M. A. 1975. Giles of Rome and the medieval Theory of Concep-tion: a Study of the ‘De formatione corporis humani in utero’, London.

+

[404] Koch, J. 1944. Introduction to [98]. +

[405] Suarez-Nani, T. 2002. Les anges et la philosophie. Subjectivite et fonctioncosmologique des substances separees a la fin du XIIIe siecle, Paris: Vrin.ℵ

[406] Wippel, J.F. 1981. The Metaphysical Thought of Godfrey of Fontaines:A Study in Late Thirteenth-Century Philosophy, Washington, DC: TheCatholic University of America Press. @

[407] Wippel, J.F. 1986. “The Role of the Phantasm in Godfrey of Fontaines’Theory of Intellection”, in Chr. Wenin, ed. L’Homme et son univers au

41


moyen age. Actes du septieme Congres intern ational de philosophiemedievale (30 aout - 4 septembre 1982), 1986, pp.573-582. +

42

Monopsychism of Latin Averroists - aequivocum.netaequivocum.net/monopsy/doc/bibkawazoe.pdf ·...

Documents

Transcript of Monopsychism of Latin Averroists - aequivocum.netaequivocum.net/monopsy/doc/bibkawazoe.pdf ·...