Mixers, Multiplexers, and...

18
Mixers, Multiplexers, and Demultiplexers Professor Jri Lee 台大電子所 李致毅教授 Electrical Engineering Department National Taiwan University

Transcript of Mixers, Multiplexers, and...

  • Mixers, Multiplexers, and Demultiplexers

    Professor Jri Lee台大電子所 李致毅教授

    Electrical Engineering DepartmentNational Taiwan University

  • Outline

    Muxes

    • N-to-1

    Mixers

    • 2-to-1

    • Bipolar and CMOS• Passive and Active

    DemuxesCase Study

  • Performance Metrics of Mixers

    NF 8-12 dBIIP3 0-5 dBmRin 50 Ω

    (Standalone)Gain 10-15 dB

    LO-RF IsolationLO-IF Isolation

    Voltage and Power Conversion Gains:

    RF

    IF P P

    PA =RF

    IF V V

    VA =

    AV and AP need not to be equal because the source and load impedances are different.

  • Passive Mixers

    *LO signal with 50% duty cycle)(RF IF tSVV ⋅=

    Voltage conversion gain = 1/π ≈ −6.4 dBTradeoff: sinusoidal LO (no higher-order harmonics) vs.

    squarewave LO (abrupt transition)

  • Active Mixers

    LO signal couples to IF.

    Conv. gain = Conv. gain =

    Differential realization

    π2

    DRF m1IF ⋅⋅⋅= RVgV

    Gradual LO ⇒ RF signal appears as common-mode ⇒reduce conversion gain.

    Single-Ended Differential

    π1

    π2

    Dm1 ⋅⋅= Rg

    Voltage conversion

    gain

    π2

  • Single-Balance and Double-Balance Mixers

    Single-Balanced Double-Balanced

    Single DoubleNoise Lower Higher

    LO-IF Feedthrough Higher LowerEven-Order Distortion Higher Lower

    Conversion Gain Lower Higher(2x)

  • Bipolar Mixers

    π2

    Cm1V ⋅⋅= RgALinearity

    Incorporating single-ended/ differential conversion.

    Power ConsumptionLO-IF FeedthroughLO-RF Feedthrough

  • Linearization Technique

    Does n matters if constant Gm is of importance?

  • CMOS Mixers

    Most of the bipolar design concepts can be applied to CMOS directly, ⇒ only LO requirement differs.Small LO signal ⇒ lower conversion gain, higher noise, higher nonlinearity.

    To make the switching sharp for a given LO ⇒ increase the width of the differential pair or reduce the bias current ⇒ lower speed or lower gain.

  • 2-to-1 Selector

    Finite rising and falling edges ⇒ timing issues

  • Deterministic Jitter of MUX

  • Deterministic Jitter of MUX

    ]2

    )([ 0S0VlnVVln −−τ

  • Output Data Cleanup with Flipflop

    Data skew and clock imbalance would cause output distortion directly.A full-rate FF can remedy this.

  • Sampling Alignment Using Latches

    Usually requires latches to provide 0.5 UI phase shift.

  • N-to-1 Multiplexer with Tree Structure

    ⇒ and also, clock distribution.

  • Demultiplexer

    Reverse operation of MUX.Much more relaxed clock/data phase requirement.Usually work with CDR.

  • Case Study (I)

    [Ishii, JSSC02]

    Tree structure. InP technology.Timing requirement relaxes as speed goes down.

  • Case Study (II)

    [Tanabe, JSSC’01]