Professor Jri Lee -...

31
Transimpedance Amplifiers Professor Jri Lee 台大電子所 李致毅教授 Electrical Engineering Department National Taiwan University

Transcript of Professor Jri Lee -...

  • Transimpedance Amplifiers

    Professor Jri Lee台大電子所 李致毅教授

    Electrical Engineering DepartmentNational Taiwan University

  • Outline

    General ConsiderationsOpen-Loop TIAsFeedback TIAsHigh Performance TIAsCase Study

  • Jitter Due to Bandwidth Limitation

    ln21 τ=T )]expln[2(1 b2 ττTT −−= )expln(1 b

    bb

    21τ

    τ TTT

    TT −−

    −=

    Insufficient bandwidth leads to deterministic jitter

  • ISI Due to Bandwidth Limitation

    For a simple RC network with f−3dB = 0.7 Rb, data jitter equals 0.28 % and ISI = 1.23 %.Practical TIAs contain multiple poles/zeros, making the analysis complex and requiring simulations.

    τΔ b

    0expISI T

    VV −

    ==

    Intersymbol Interference (ISI):defining the vertical eye closure.

  • Noise Effect

    For a BER of 10 , SNR needs to be around 14.−12

    Noise issue becomes more severe for low supply-voltage designs.

    ∫∞

    =−

    =n0

    )2

    (2

    exp21

    n

    PP2

    totc, σ σπVVQdxxP

    2exp

    21

    2exp

    21)(

    22 xx

    duuxQx

    −≈

    −= ∫

    ππ3>xfor

  • Single-Register TIAs

    Direct trade off between speed and noise ⇒seeking circuits that provide low input resistance (high bandwidth) and high gain.

    RT(Transimpedance Gain) = RL

    D2L

    2inn, CR

    kTI =

    DL21

    CRπ=Data Rate

    Simplest way to convert current into voltage.

  • Typical TIA Specs for OC-192 (10 Gb/s)

    High Gain

    Gain > 1 kΩ

    Bandwidth > 9 GHz

    Sensitivity < -18 dBm

    Maximum Input > 3 dBm

    Peaking < 2 dB

    Challenges:

    Large Input RangeLow Noise

    High BandwidthGood PSRRReasonable Power

  • Open-Loop TIAs

    Common Gate Common Base

    DT RR =

    ombm

    D

    mbmin )(

    1rgg

    Rgg

    R+

    ++

    CT RR =

    om

    C

    min

    1rg

    Rg

    R +≈

    Satisfying (input) impedance matching. Comparable gain (consumes voltage headroom, too).

  • High Frequency Response of Open-Loop TIAs

    Input pole dominates (Cin ~ 250 fF).Multiple tradeoffs make it difficult to achieve broad band and high gain simultaneously.

    Common Gate Common Base

    1))(()(

    outDinmb1m1

    Dmb1m1

    in

    out

    ++++

    =sCRsCgg

    RggI

    V1))(( outDinm1

    Cm1

    in

    out

    ++=

    sCRsCgRg

    IV

  • Noise Performance of Common-Gate Stages

    Noise Currents of M2 and RD are referred to the input with unity gain and trade with each other.

    For more information about noise, check: “Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits”, Chap 7.

    2Rn,

    2Mn,

    Dm2

    2inn,

    D2

    )1(4

    II

    RgkTI

    +=

    += γ

    D2

    DD2

    Mn,2

    Rn, 2D

    84IV

    IkT

    IkT

  • High Frequency Noise Analysis of CG Stages

    Little flexibility can be achieved in CG/CB TIAs.

    )21

    41(4 inp,m2outp,m1

    2totin,n, ωωγ ggkTI +=

    in

    mb1m1inp, C

    gg +=ω

    outDoutp,

    1CR

    CG/CB architecture bears intrinsic limitation in many aspects.

  • Feedback TIAs

    Consider a shunt-shunt feedback system:

    mFD

    openout,out

    mFD

    openin,in

    mFD

    DT

    1

    1

    1

    gRR

    R

    gRR

    R

    gRRR

    +=

    +=

    +=

    Many restrictions in CG/CB topology would be released.

    Reasonable Gain

    Impedance Matching

  • First-Order Feedback TIAs

    RF does not need to carry a bias current, relaxing the voltage headroom limitation.

    sCRAARR

    DF

    FT 1++

    −=

    DF3dB 2 CR

    Afπ

    =−Ideal

    Opamp

  • Noise Performance of Feedback TIAs

    Noise can be reduced by increasing RF .

    (when CD = 0)

    Vn,RF approaches AVn,A as the frequency goes to infinity ⇒ inaccurate opamp model (it should have a finite bandwidth).

    AsCRVsCRV

    VDF

    An,DFRFn,outn, 1

    1)(+

    ++=

    2F

    2An,

    F

    2inn,

    4RV

    RkTI +=

  • High Frequency Performance of Feedback TIAs

    For maximum flatten response

    Bandwidth is greater than that of first order TIA by 41%.

    0

    0

    1)(

    ωsAsA

    +=

    DF

    00

    0DF

    0DF2

    D

    00

    T 1)(1CR

    AsCR

    CRs

    CA

    ωω

    ω

    ++

    ++

    =

    21

    =ζDF

    03dB 2

    2CR

    Afπ

    =−⇒ ,

  • CMOS Realization of Feedback TIA

    Dm1

    m2out

    Dm1

    Fin

    FDm1

    Dm1T

    11

    1

    1

    RggR

    RgRR

    RRg

    RgR

    +=

    +=

    +=

    )1(44 2D

    2m1m2D

    2m1m1

    2FF

    2inn, RggRggR

    kTRkTI γγ +++=

    Generally inversely proportional to RF.

  • High-Frequency Behavior of Feedback TIA

    TIA may oscillate due to the three poles around the feedback loop.CD and CL are nontrivial.

  • Modified Feedback TIA

    Split the feedback loop with output port.Adding internal buffer.

  • Power Supply Rejection Issue

    Photodiode provides a single-ended current, leading to a single-ended TIA design and poor power supply rejection.

    Dm1DD

    out

    11

    RgVV

    +=

    ∂∂

    Common issue for all single-ended circuits.

  • Differential TIAs

    Unequal gain and phase shift at high frequencies.

    Issues:

    Input noise current times higher.Generating only “pseudo” differential output.

    2

    ‘‘Pseudo’’ Differential

  • Single-Ended to Differential Conversion

    Time constant of tens of microseconds requires large external capacitor.Data pattern dependent.

    Average of Vx

  • High-Gain Techniques

    Noise inevitably becomes higher.Providing extra current without IR drop.

    (Under what condition?)

  • Capacitive Coupling

    Relax the voltage-headroom requirement.Some standards need very long runs, leading to external large R and C.Stability is of concern.

  • Feedback TIA without Source Follower

    mDout

    Dm

    DFin

    FDDm

    Fm

    in

    out

    11

    11

    gRR

    RgRRR

    RRRgRg

    VV

    =

    ++

    =

    −≈+−

    −=

    FD2F

    2m

    2Fm

    2inn,

    444RkT

    RRgkT

    RgkTI ++= γ

    Degenerate the source follower.Tradeoffs between gain, stability, noise, and robustness.

  • Inductive Peaking

    LD3dB 2

    1CR

    =−πω

    ωζωζω

    22s2s n

    2nn

    2n

    Dmin

    out

    +++

    −= RgVV

    21 for

    21.79

    LD3dB ==− ζπ CR

    f

  • Automatic Gain Control

    Large input current may degrade the response be pulling one or more current source into triode region.Necessitating dynamic tracking mechanism to adjust it in real time.

  • Automatic Gain Control

    system may become unstable as RF goes down.

    Since

    121

    0

    0DF

    +=

    ACR ω

    ζ

    ⇒ Need to reduce A0 so as to maintain a relatively constant ζ.

  • Case Study (I)

    Korramabadi et. al. [ISSCC, 96]

  • Case Study (II)

    Wu et. al. [JSSC, 03]

  • Case Study (III)

    Park et. al. [JSSC, 04]

  • Case Study (IV)

    Chen et. al. [JSSC, 05]