Electron Identification with the ALICE TRD
-
Upload
macon-fletcher -
Category
Documents
-
view
41 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Electron Identification with the ALICE TRD
Electron Identification with the ALICE TRD
Clemens Adler
Physikalisches Institut Heidelberg
For the TRD collaboration
HCP2005, Les Diablerets, July, 6 2005
TRD in numbersPurpose: Electron ID in the central barrel
at p > 1 GeV/c Fast (6 μs) trigger for high-pt
Particles (pt > 3 GeV/c) +PID
Parameters: 540 modules → 767 m2 area18 “supermodules” 6 layers, 5 longitudinal stacks Length: 7 m 28 m3 Xe/CO2 (85:15)
1.2 million read out channels 15 TB/s on-detector bandwidth
Physics with the TRDTogether with TPC and ITS (dE/dx, good
momentum resolution), the TRD provides electron identification sufficient to study:
Di-electron channel: production of J/Psi, Upsilon and continuum (complementary to muon arm measurement).
+ Displaced vertex from ITS: E.g. Identify J/Psi from B decays
Single electron channel: semi-leptonic decays of open charm and beauty:
Handle on c+b production x-section
TRD alone:
L1 trigger on high-Pt particles+electron identification: Factor 100 Enhancement of potentially interesting events (PbPb).
Upsilon enrichment Jets: Study “jet quenching” under LHC
conditions
TPC dE/dx:~7% resolution
TRD pion efficiency
Test beam data:90% electron efficiency
Goal
Quarkonia performance
Phd. thesis Tariq Mahmoud, Heidelberg
pt/pt < 2% up to 10 GeV/c < 9% up to 100 GeV/c
B = 0.5 T
Central Barrel Pt-resolution
Signal/Background Significance
What is new at LHC
Plenty of c+b to start with
central AA
Upsilon suppression should be observable at LHC
RHICLHC
hard gluon induced quarkonium
breakup hep-ph/0311048
Complete primary J/Psi suppression expected
Strong (centrality dependant) secondary J/Psi production (statistical hadronization)
->strong QGP Signal
Read Out Chambers Large area chambers (1-1,7 m²)
-> need high rigidity
Low rad. length (15%Xo) -> low Z, low mass material
-> Carbon reinforced sandwich construction
Read out chambers II
• 5 chamber production sites:– Bucharest (NIPNE)
– Dubna (JINR)
– GSI (Darmstadt)
– Heidelberg (University)
– Frankfurt (University)
Dubna
Bukarest
• QA:– Standardized chamber
building prescription
– Chambers have to pass well defined set of Quality control steps
2d gain uniformity
Electronics
• 1.2 million channels• 18 channels in 1 MCM• 16(+1) MCMs per readout board (4104 pc.)• 260 000 CPUs working in parallel during readout
Electronics Status
• PASA and TRAP chips ready• PASA: have full quantity• TRAP: several Wafers
• Readout boards: last design changes
• Integration of electronics on chambers ongoing
PASATRAP
Electron ID
LQ Method:
Likelihood with total charge
Typical signal of single particle
LQX Method:
2d-Likelihood: Total charge + position of maximum cluster
()(
)(
PeP
ePL
Likelihood distributionExtract probabilities
Integrated Charge
Total charge spectra
Depos. Energy (keV)
Co
un
ts
Max. cluster position
Distribution of maximum cluster position
PID with Neural Network I
Each neuron of one Layer is connected to every neuron of the following Layer.
Input Layer: Charge per timebin
One hidden Layer: 22 neurons
Output layer per chamber: Probability to be Electron/Pion
Connect 6 Chambers by NN, or multiplication of Probabilities.
Submitted to NIM A, arXiv:physics/0506202v1
PID with Neural Network IISo far analysis done for Testbeam data with 4 small prototype chambers->extrapolation to 6 Chambers
Momentum dependence of Pion efficiency
To do:• Test with higher statistics and on generalized dataset (new Testbeam data)•Try to understand this significant improvement analytically
Testbeam Oct. 2004
• 4 small size prototype chambers (Transition radiation spectra measurement).
• 6 real size production chambers (2 different size types)• (Almost) final electronics
Position/Angle Resolution
Large chambers Prototype
Position resolution (y): 200-300 micron
Angle Resolution: <0.5°
Pion efficiency
2004 Test beam data compared to 2002 Test beam data:Somewhat worse separation
Pions
Electrons
Points: 2002 dataLines: 2004 data
Pion efficiency slightly worse than in previous test beam
Transition radiation
Transition radiationEnergy spectrum
data
simulation
Number of produced TR photons with different RadiatorsRegular: foil stacksSandwich: ALICE TRD radiator
Online Tracking
256
512
768
1024
AD
C V
alu
e
ADC Channel
Tim
e B
in [
0.1
us]
0 5 10 15 20
0
5
10
15
20
Comparison: Online tracking ↔ Offline tracking
Very Good Agreement!Outliers on per mille level due toCalculation precisionO
ffli
lne
Online
Summary
• TRD enhances ALICE Heavy flavour physics capabilities
• Detector mass production under way.
• Electronics finalized• Electronics Integration in
final iteration• First Supermodule to be
assembled end of the year
• Testbeam:– Detector performance is
well understood and satisfies design considerations
• Neural network approach:– New test beam data (6
real size chambers, different angles, higher statistics)
– Can information used by NN be extracted analytically?
TRD CollaborationMain Contributions:Germany:• Frankfurt University (IKF)• Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung (GSI) Darmstadt• Heidelberg University (Physikalisches Institut, Kirchhoff Institut)• Münster University (IKP)Russia:• JINR Dubna Romania:• NIPNE Bukarest
Additional Subsystems:Japan: Tokyo University, Nagasaki UniversityGreece: Athens University Germany: FH Köln, University Kaiserslautern, FH Worms, TU Darmstadt