Commutative Algebra - math.uni-tuebingen.dekeilen/download/Lehre/CAWS05/blatt-13.pdfIf we replace...

1
Fachbereich Mathematik Winter Semester 2005/06, Set 13 Dr. Thomas Markwig Commutative Algebra Due date: Tuesday, 21/02/2006, 10h00 Exercise 48: Let K be any field, and α =(α 1 ,...,α n ) n be an independent set of real numbers. Show: a. ϕ α : K(x 1 ...,x n ) K{{t}} : f g f(t α 1 ,...,t αn ) g(t α 1 ,...,t αn ) is a K-algebramonomorphism. b. v : K(x 1 ,...,x n ) * : h (ord ϕ α )(h) is a valuation of K(x 1 ,...,x n ). c. 1 = dim(R v ) < trdeg K ( K(x 1 ,...,x n ) ) - trdeg K ( R v /m Rv ) = n, for n 2. Note, ord : K{{t}} * is the valuation of K{{t}} from Exercise 47. Exercise 49: Let R be a Dedekind domain and 0 S R multiplicatively closed. Show that either S -1 R = Quot(R) or S -1 R is a Dedekind domain. Exercise 50: [Lemma of Gauß] * Let R be a Dedekind domain. For a polynomial f = n i=0 a i x i R[x] we call c(f)= a 0 ,...,a n R the content of f. Show that c(f) · c(g)= c(f · g) for f, g R[x]. Hint, reduce to the case that R is local (i.e. a DVR), and use Nakayama’s Lemma in a suitable way. Exercise 51: [Chinese Remainder Theorem] Let R be a Dedekind domain and I 1 ,...,I n R. a. Show that the following sequence is exact R ϕ - n i=1 R/I i ψ - i<j R/(I i + I j ), where ϕ(x)=(x + I 1 ,...,x + I n ) and ψ(x 1 + I 1 ,...,x n + I n )=(x i - x j + I i + I j ) i<j . b. Given x 1 ,...,x n R. Show there is an x R such that x x i (mod I i ) for i = 1,...,n if and only if x i x j (mod I i + I j ) for i = j. Hint for part a., localize with respect to maximal ideals! – Note, part b. generalizes 1.12. * What is the connection to the Lemma of Gauß in 1.38, stating “R factorial implies R[x] factorial”? If we replace the assumption “R Dedekind domain” by “R UFD” the above result holds true as well. Call a polynomial primitive if c(f)= R (or equivalently if R * is the gcd of the coefficients of f), then we deduce from the above result that a primitive polynomial in R[x] can only factorize in a product of primitive polynomials, which are then necessarily of smaller degree. By induction on the degree we see that each primitive polynomial is a product of irreducible primitive polynomials. Thus, every polynomial is a product of irreducible ones, since splitting off a greatest common divisor g of its coefficients gives a primitive one and g factorises since R is factorial. – It then only remains to show that each irreducible polynomial in R[x] is prime. – In the literature it is more common to call the statement “R UFD implies c(f · g)= c(f) · c(g)” the Lemma of Gauß.

Transcript of Commutative Algebra - math.uni-tuebingen.dekeilen/download/Lehre/CAWS05/blatt-13.pdfIf we replace...

Page 1: Commutative Algebra - math.uni-tuebingen.dekeilen/download/Lehre/CAWS05/blatt-13.pdfIf we replace the assumption “RDedekind domain” by “RUFD” the above result holds true as

Fachbereich Mathematik Winter Semester 2005/06, Set 13

Dr. Thomas Markwig

Commutative Algebra

Due date: Tuesday, 21/02/2006, 10h00

Exercise 48: Let K be any field, and α = (α1, . . . , αn) ∈ Rn be an independent set

of real numbers. Show:

a. ϕα : K(x1 . . . , xn) → K{{t}} : fg7→ f(tα1 ,...,tαn )

g(tα1 ,...,tαn )is a K-algebramonomorphism.

b. v : K(x1, . . . , xn)∗ 7→ R : h 7→ (ord ◦ϕα)(h) is a valuation of K(x1, . . . , xn).

c. 1 = dim(Rv) < trdegK(K(x1, . . . , xn)

)− trdegK

(Rv/mRv

)= n, for n ≥ 2.

Note, ord : K{{t}}∗ → R is the valuation of K{{t}} from Exercise 47.

Exercise 49: Let R be a Dedekind domain and 0 6∈ S ⊂ R multiplicatively closed.

Show that either S−1R = Quot(R) or S−1R is a Dedekind domain.

Exercise 50: [Lemma of Gauß]∗

Let R be a Dedekind domain. For a polynomial f =∑ni=0 aix

i ∈ R[x] we call c(f) =

〈a0, . . . , an〉R the content of f. Show that c(f) · c(g) = c(f · g) for f, g ∈ R[x].

Hint, reduce to the case that R is local (i.e. a DVR), and use Nakayama’s Lemma in a suitable way.

Exercise 51: [Chinese Remainder Theorem]

Let R be a Dedekind domain and I1, . . . , In � R.

a. Show that the following sequence is exact

−→ n⊕i=1

R/Iiψ

−→ ⊕i<j

R/(Ii + Ij),

where ϕ(x) = (x+ I1, . . . , x+ In) and ψ(x1 + I1, . . . , xn + In) = (xi − xj + Ii + Ij)i<j.

b. Given x1, . . . , xn ∈ R. Show there is an x ∈ R such that x ≡ xi (mod Ii) for

i = 1, . . . , n if and only if xi ≡ xj (mod Ii + Ij) for i 6= j.

Hint for part a., localize with respect to maximal ideals! – Note, part b. generalizes 1.12.

∗What is the connection to the Lemma of Gauß in 1.38, stating “R factorial implies R[x] factorial”?

If we replace the assumption “R Dedekind domain” by “R UFD” the above result holds true as well.

Call a polynomial primitive if c(f) = R (or equivalently if R∗ is the gcd of the coefficients of f), then

we deduce from the above result that a primitive polynomial in R[x] can only factorize in a product

of primitive polynomials, which are then necessarily of smaller degree. By induction on the degree

we see that each primitive polynomial is a product of irreducible primitive polynomials. Thus, every

polynomial is a product of irreducible ones, since splitting off a greatest common divisor g of its

coefficients gives a primitive one and g factorises since R is factorial. – It then only remains to show

that each irreducible polynomial in R[x] is prime. – In the literature it is more common to call the

statement “R UFD implies c(f · g) = c(f) · c(g)” the Lemma of Gauß.