ACCELERATORS AND MEDICAL PHYSICS 4 - physique.cuso.ch · EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 1 ACCELERATORS...
Transcript of ACCELERATORS AND MEDICAL PHYSICS 4 - physique.cuso.ch · EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 1 ACCELERATORS...
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 1
ACCELERATORS AND MEDICAL PHYSICS
4
Ugo Amaldi
University of Milano Bicocca and TERA Foundation
2
The distribution of the dose in hadrontherapy
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
The narrow peak has to
be enlarged longitudinally
3
Spread Out Bragg Peak
SOBP
General laws:
R = Ro (E/Eo)1.82
ΔR/R = 1.8 ΔE/ E
For Δd<1.5 mm at d=150 mm
ΔE/ E < 0.5%
tail
cobalt 60
linac
light ion
(carbon)
proton
Longitudinally and transversally
the carbon peak is 3 times
narrower than the proton peak.
The widths are prop. to 1/√M
3
Distal
fall-off
Δd/d=1%
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
4
Carbon ions have less multiple scattering than
protons : higher lateral precision
carbon beam
proton beam
Depth in tissue
12 cm
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 5
Protons and ions spare healthy tissues
charged hadron beam
that loses energy in matter
27 cm
tumour
target200 MeV - 1 nA
protons
4800 MeV – 0.1 nAcarbon ions
VERY LOW
CURRENTS !
Photons ProtonsPhotons ProtonsX raysprotons or
carbon ions
Two methods for imparting the dose:
“passive” system
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 6
7
Respiratory gating with a synchrotron
Cyclotrons are better because the beam is always present
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
1A. Standard procedure: Passive beam spreading
with respiratory gating
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 8
Collimator
Double scatterer
Bolus: has to be
machined for each case.
PSI
1A. Standard procedure: Passive beam spreading
with respiratory gating
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 9
Collimator
Double scatterer
Bolus: has to be
machined for each case.
PSI
1B. Advanced procedure: layer stacking
with respiratory gating
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 10
2A. Active “spot scanning” technique by PSI
(Villigen)
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 11
1
2
3
1
2
3
‘spot’ position
During the displacement
the cyclotron beam is
switched off for 5 ms
Distance between the centers
is 75% of the FWHM
12
Gantry 2
Gantry 1
ACCEL
SC cyclotron
250 MeV protons
ExperimentOPTIS
PROSCAN
TERA
2A. Active “spot scanning” technique by PSI
with respiratory gating (Villigen)
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
PROSCAN at PSI (Villigen):
with Gantry 1 and Gantry 2
13
2A. Active “spot scanning” technique by PSI
with respiratory gating (Villigen)
PROTONS
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
1414
Next: Spot scanning compensated by correcting the
spot position and multipainting
PROTONS
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
Feedback from a
device which detects
the position of the
tumour
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 15
2B. Active “raster scanning” technique by GSI
with respiratory gating (Darmstadt)
Distance between the centers of the
mini-voxels is 30% of the FWHM.
The beam is always on.
16
The GSI pilot project : 1997-2008
Gerhard Kraft
J. Debus
450 patients treated
with carbon ions
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
GSI: procedure to cover uniformly a spherical target
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 17
More dose at the periphery
Conformity of the irradiation with protons and ions
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 18
1919
IMPT = Intensity Modulated Particle Therapy with protons
4 NON-UNIFORM FIELDS
PSI
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
20
To be compared with IMRT with photons
9 NON-UNIFORM FIELDS
PSI
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
21
Protons are quantitatively different from X-rays
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
22
Carbon ions are qualitatively different from X-rays
Carbon ions deposit in a cell 22 times more energy than a proton
producing not reparable multiple close-by double strand breaks
Carbon ions can control radio-resistant tumours
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
Biological effects of protons and carbon ions
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 23
Electrons put in motion by X rays: “sparsely ionizing”
24
d=200 nm
X beam
30 cm
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
25
d=200 nm
30 cm
Beam of 200 MeV proton
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
d=50 nm
d= 15 nm
d=90 nm
Protons1: more favorable dose- 2. same „indirect effects‟
X ray beam
26
d=200 nm
30 cm
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
d=50 nm
d= 15 nm
d=90 nm
Protons1: more favorable dose- 2. same „indirect effects‟
Also protons are „sparsely ionizing
Beam of 200 MeV proton
X ray beam
Microscopic distribution of the X ray dose
7
μm
e- range = 15
mm
X ray = 3 MeV γ
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 27
150 ionizations/cell
Microscopic distribution of the X ray dose
7
μm
e- range = 15
mm
X ray = 4 MeV γ
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 28
X ray = 4 MeV γ
150 ionizations/cell
Microscopic distribution of the X ray dose
7
μm
e- range = 15
mm
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 29
Microscopic distribution of the proton dose
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 30
Microscopic distribution of the proton dose
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 31
Microscopic distribution of the proton dose
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 32
Microscopic distribution of the proton dose
Protons are “sparsely ionizing”
as photons/electrons
SAME CLINICAL EFFECTS BUT
MUCH BETTER “CONFORMITY”
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 33
34
30 cm
d= 4 nm
d= 2 nm
4 cm
Carbon ions: 1. more favorable dose- 2. „direct effects”
d= 0.3 nm
d=200 nm
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
Beam of 200 MeV protons
X ray beam
Beam of 4800 MeV carbon ions
35
30 cm
d= 4 nm
d= 2 nm
4 cm
Ioni carbonio: 1. dose più favorevole - 2. effetti „diretti‟ sulle
cellule tumorali
d= 0.3 nm
d=200 nm
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
Carbon ins are „densely ionizing
Beam of 200 MeV protons
X ray beam
Beam of 4800 MeV carbon ions
36
Effect of ΔE/Δx = LET
Mauro Belli et al
ISS
Sparsely ionizing radiation
with respect to the dimensions
of the double helix (2 nm)
Densely ionizing radiation
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
37
Two qualitatively different microscopic dose distributions
densely ionizing radiation sparsely ionizing radiation
Visualization
of repair
proteins
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
38
Definition of Radio-Biological Effectiveness
RBE is defined with respect
to standard X rays:
RBE = = = 5
For a given effect on a given cell
the RBE value is a function of LET
Dγ 5
D 1
C+6
no repair
X rayswith repair
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
39
Response of different cells to high-LET radiations
Survival of V79 aerated and anoxic cells versus LET of carbon-12 ions
with oxygen without oxygen
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
40
Response of different cells to high-LET radiations
Survival of V79 aerated and anoxic cells versus LET of carbon-12 ions
with oxygen without oxygen
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
41
Effect of LET on RBEs of many cells for many „end-points‟„
LET > 20 keV/μm and RBE > 1.5 in the last 40 mm
so that carbon can control radioresistant tumours
i.e. tumours which need 2-3 times larger doses to be controlled with either X rays or protons
4800 MeV stop
RB
E
200 MeV stopp
C
LET (keV/μm)1 MeV/cm
X rays
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
42
The “effective dose” in Gye is defined as Gy x RBE „
At GSI the values of RBE are computed with X-ray cell survival data
by using the Local Effect Model (LEM) by G. Kraft el al.
To obtain a „flat‟ dose in Gye the “physical dose” is not „flat‟
GSI
Spread Out Bragg Peak
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
The GSI Local Effect Model (LEM)
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 43
Survival =
Different for
tumour and
healthy tissues
RBE computed from Survivals
M. Scholz, GSI
Elective indications of carbon ions
calculated with LEM
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 44
NO
YES
YES
YES
M. Scholz, GSI
Elective indications of carbon ions
calculated with LEM
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 45
NO
YES
YES
YES
M. Scholz, GSI About 80% of all solid tumours
46
Numbers of potential patients (*)
X-ray therapy
every 10 million inhabitants: 20'000 pts/year
Protontherapy
12% of X-ray patients 2'400 pts/year
Therapy with Carbon ions for radio-resistant tumour
3% of X-ray patients 600 pts/year
TOTAL every 10 M about 3'000 pts/year
______
(*) Combining studies made in Austria, Germany, France and Italy in the framework
of ENLIGHT - Coordinator: Manjit Dosanjh –
Projects in FP7: ULICE, PARTNER, ENVISION , ENTERVISION for a total of 22 MEuro
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi
47
52 -83 %31 – 75 %5 year
survival
Soft-tissue
carcinoma
77 %61 %24-28 %local control
rate
Salivary gland
tumours
100 %23 %5 year
survival
Liver tumours
7.8 months6.5 monthsav. survival
time
Pancreatic
carcinoma
63 %21 %local control
rate
Paranasal sinuses
tumours
96 % (*)95 %local control
rate
Choroid
melanoma
16 months12 monthsav. survival
time
Glioblastoma
63 %40 -50 %5 year
survival
Nasopharynx
carcinoma
89 %88 %33 %local control
rate
Chondrosarcoma
70 %65 %30 – 50 %local control
rate
Chordoma
Results carbon
GSI
Results carbon
HIMAC-NIRSResults photonsEnd pointIndication
Table by G. Kraft
2007
Results of
carbon ions
Similar to protons
THE END
EPFL 4- 4.11.10 - U. Amaldi 48