7.1. PLANT MACROFOSSILS FROM TOFTANES
Transcript of 7.1. PLANT MACROFOSSILS FROM TOFTANES
7.1. PLANT MACROFOSSILS FROM TOFTANESJOANNA BENDING
METHODS AND OVERVIEWSamples for plant macrofossils were sieved over a stack of 10mm, 5mm and 300μm test sieves and the identifi -able material extracted by hand under a low power bin-ocular microscope. Both charred and non-charred items were recovered. Charred material was recovered from 28 of the 30 samples analysed, and non-charred from 29 of the 30 samples. The common plant macrofossil constitu-ents of the matrix were moss, fragments of wood, twigs, charcoal, charred twigs, seeds, charred seeds and charred seaweed. Samples from occupation layers tended to be more diverse in terms of the presence of these types (with fi ve or more of eight types considered being present in each sample) than those from external areas, abandon-ment debris and pre-landnám deposits. There are, how-ever, exceptions to this, notably samples 1761 (from the abandonment of the settlement), 2752 (from the fi replace) and 1475 (from the fl oor), which are taken from internal areas of the settlement, but exhibit a low diversity of con-stituents. Plant nomenclature follows Jóhansen (2000) where relevant.
Preservation of plant material was considered to be good as delicate items such as Juncus (rush) seeds and Poaceae (grass) seed coats were often preserved well enough to be identifi ed to species. Potential human food-stuffs include Hordeum (barley) grain, Corylus avellana (hazel) nuts, Empetrum nigrum (crowberry), Brassica spp. (cf. cabbage family, including several crop plants, some with edible seeds) and possibly Carum carvi (cara-way). Non-charred seeds tended to be common in each sample, with species such as Montia fontana ssp. fontana (blinks) members of the genus Carex (sedge family) and Juniperus communis (juniper) occurring most frequently. Charred material included nodules of peat/dung (although it was not possible to differentiate between dung and peat pellets in the samples), wild seeds, cereal grain, leaves, chaff, wood, twigs and seaweed. Leaves, seed capsules, twigs and fragments of wood were also preserved, both charred and non-charred. Chips of worked wood (i.e. fragments of wood with cut marks) were non-charred.
The 19 samples that could be located spatially on a plan of the site are represented as pie charts based on the habitat association of the taxa in Fig. 125. Pre-lándnam samples tended to contain taxa associated with wet con-ditions or water, including Sphagnum (peat moss) and Hippuris vulgaris (common mare’s tail). In the occupa-tion deposits, although there is no strong patterning, but it would appear that samples located in Building I and the central area of House II were more mixed in composition than those from either end of House II, the outside areas and the abandonment layers [Fig. 126]. The samples tak-en from around the fi replace (2265 and 1399) contained less Montia fontana ssp. fontana and a lower proportion of outfi eld types than the other fl oor deposits.
Some of the contexts categorised as ‘abandonment’ by the excavators are very similar archaeobotanically to those from occupation deposits from the same area of the excavation. The summary of the habitat associations of the seed assemblage mentioned above [Fig. 125] and a consideration of the contribution of the major constitu-ents of the matrix of the sample [Figs. 126-127] show that some samples from occupation and abandonment deposits located near to each other have a similar com-position (1597 and 2925, and to a lesser extent 1016 and 1963). This is also apparent in a correspondence analysis (Gauch 1982) of the samples from Toftanes, where these two pairs of samples are placed close to one another on the basis of their species composition [Fig. 128]. In the following analyses, samples will be grouped by phase and structure: pre-landnám, Building I, House II, phase 1, House II, phase 3 and from the outside yard area, in-dependently of the excavator’s assignment to occupation and abandonment phases.
INVESTIGATION OF SOURCE OF CHARRED MATERIAL IN THE TOFTANES SAMPLES To establish the signifi cance of the charred material re-covered from the site, it was necessary to investigate the source of the material, and to establish whether the ma-terial was part of the non-charred assemblage that had become charred, or was charred in another location and mixed with the non-charred material.
Of the 30 samples analysed, 22 contained charred
7. ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIAL
130
NUTRIENT-INTERMEDIATE-RICHDISTURBED(RUDERAL-ARABLE)VARIOUS(TENDSRUDERAL-ARABLE)
NUTRIENT-INTERMEDIATE-RICHUNDISTURBED(HAYFIELD)VARIOUS(TENDSHAYFIELD)
NUTRIENT-RICH
MOISTOUTFIELD-NUTRIENT-INTERMEDIATE-POOR
OUTFIELD - NUTRIENT-POOR
WET-WATER-NUTRIENT-INTERMEDIATE
WET-WATER-NUTRIENT-POOR
MONTIAFONTANA
1760
1622
1582 1995
2654
1963
1962
1597
2653
2734
2665
1923
2265
1551 & 1475
1471
2752
1623
1621
1964 2422
1016
2147
5 Metres
N
House I
House XI
House XII
House II
5 Metres
N
House II floor west
House II drain
Between I and II
House II, phase 3
Outside House II
Pre-landnam
House II
18th century
SPHAGNUM
N.B. WHITE CIRCLE - LESS THAN 50 SEEDS
1016
1963
1597
2925
2711
1682
2147
1964 2422
1995
1582
2219 2052 570
1399
2265
2752
1475
2653
2654645
1622
1761
2665 2734 1641
595
3951400
Fig. 126. Plan of Toftanes showing samples as pie charts based on the non-charred seed component of the sample. Taxa are categorised by the habitat association category or as Montia fontana ssp. fontana. Taxa which could not be assigned a habitat association category are not included in the counts. Samples located with arrows indicate approximate location based on context description. Samples with similar seed composition in spite of different
archaeological phasing are marked with red circle.
Fig. 125. Keys for graphs in this chapter a) Toftanes settlement areas and phases, and b) habitat associations of taxa.
Acta Archaeologica
131
012345
moss
wood (fra
gmen
ts)
wood (tw
igs)
charc
oal
charc
oal (t
wigs)
seed
seed
(charr
ed)
seaw
eed (ch
arred
)
mosswood (fragments)wood (twigs)charcoalcharcoal (twigs)seedseed (charred) seaweed (charred)
5 Metres
N
House II floor west
House II drain
House II, phase 3
Between I and II
Outside House II
Pre-landnam
House II
18th century
1995
2422 1964
1963
2147
1016
1582 2265
2752
1399
2654
2653
1622
2925
1597
645
2711
1682 1761
595
395
1475
1400
2665 2734 1641
570 2052 2219
Fig. 127. Plan of Toftanes with bar charts indicating major constituents of the bulk sample matrix (the y-axis represents the 5 point scale presented in Table 3). Samples located on plan based on position in section drawings. Samples located with arrows indicate approximate location based on context
description.
5.20.1-
5.10.1-
570
645
1016
1399
1400
15821597
1622
1761
1963
1995
20522265
2422
26532654 2665
2711
2925
SAMPLES
Pre-landnam
I - Floor
II - Floor
II - Drain
II - Fireplace
II, phase 3 - Floor
Outside
Abandonment
Fig. 128. Plot of results of correspondence analysis of Toftanes samples. Samples are categorised by excavators’ context descriptions. Only samples with more than 50 seeds were included in the analysis. Samples 595, 1641, 1682, 1760, 1964, 2147 and 2219 were excluded from the analysis as they had unusual compositions. They would have had extreme values in the analysis and appeared as outliers in the plot, so the patterns above would not be
visible. Only taxa present in more than 10% of samples were included in the analysis.
Toftanes. A Viking Age Farmstead in the Faroe Islands
132
material (73%) [Table 3]. The most commonly occurring types were undifferentiated wood (20 samples - 67%) and charred nodules of peat/dung (17 samples - 57%), wild seeds (12 samples - 40%), cereal grain (11 samples - 37%), seaweed (6 samples - 20%). Juniperus communis leaf (2 samples - 7%) and Calluna vulgaris (heather) leaf (1 sample - 3%) were also present.
Charred wild seeds and seaweed were only present in samples taken from within the buildings or from the drain associated with the eastern end of House II. Charred ce-real grain occurred in low quantities in samples from ex-ternal areas but was predominantly recovered from inside the buildings. This suggests that the wild seeds and sea-weed are likely to have become charred within the build-ings, and that charred material from the buildings was not dumped in the yard in any great amounts. Charred cereal grains found in the outside area may have been carried on feet from the interior fl oors, or may indicate that cereal grain was brought in from another area in the farmstead where it had been in proximity to fi re (e.g. after drying). Charcoal and charred nodules of peat or dung are present in the outside area. This may be due to the general ubiqui-ty of these types (they may be more common than charred seeds as they are purposefully burned for fuel, and there-fore more commonly available to be incorporated into the deposits in and around the settlement), or the removal and discard of spent fuel from the house.
The proportion of charred seeds in the 16 samples var-ied from 100% (sample 2752) to 0.05%, but was less than 5% for the majority of samples [Fig. 129]. Charred cereal grain was the most common type (11 samples), and most (10) samples contained only one or two types of charred seeds. Charred seed types occur slightly more frequently in the same samples as non-charred versions of the same type - of the 58 occurrences of charred seed types identi-fi ed to genus or above, 31 (56%) occurred in conjunction with non-charred seeds of the same type. This suggests the charred component of the samples does not originate entirely from the same source as the non-charred com-ponent, although some of it may do so, i.e. the charred assemblage is not (only) made up of material present in the area being charred in situ (e.g. by lamps or fi re which charred seeds present in the fl oor, roof or walls).
Charred seed types from a range of habitats were present, including species associated with bogs, heath or rocky areas in the outfi eld, and both disturbed and un-disturbed nutrient-rich habitats. Of the types recovered,
the seeds of Empetrum nigrum, Corylus nuts and cereal grain could have been brought onto the site as food re-sources. The combination of seeds from foods and cereal grain with taxa associated with various habitats make it unlikely that the charred assemblage came to the site from one source (i.e. it is not solely the refuse from cereal grain drying, peat burning or another single activity that brought plant material into proximity to fi re).
Correspondence analysis was used to see whether there was any pattern in the charred component of the samples. Twenty-three samples each with more than 30 seed items, and all 52 charred and non-charred seed types occurring in more than 10% of the samples were included [Fig. 130]. Samples 595 and 2752 were not included as sample 595 had an exceptionally high proportion of Se-laginella selaginoides (lesser clubmoss) megaspores and sample 2752 contained less than 30 quantifi able items, and they were clearly different from other samples. Their presence in the analysis would have resulted in outlying samples in the plot, which would have obscured the scat-ter of the other samples. The samples containing over 10% charred seeds were located on both the positive and negative arms of the fi rst axis, and along the positive arm of the second axis. Samples with a smaller charred seed component (samples 2147, 1622, 1963, 2645 and, to a lesser extent, 1400) were also located in this zone. The analysis grouped the charred types with low positive and negative values on the fi rst axis, and on the positive arm of the second axis [Fig. 130].
The charred seed assemblages in the samples differ - 1964 (at the positive end of the second axis) contains cereal grain and various wild seeds from nutrient-rich habitats, sample 2653 only Stellaria media (common chickweed) and sample 2654 only seeds of Poaceae. The charred seed types in samples 2653 and 2654 occur also as non-charred seeds in the samples. In sample 1964, three of the eight charred seed types occur independently of non-charred material, indicating that they may have become incorporated in the sample via a different tapho-nomic path to the non-charred assemblage.
Regarding the vegetative material [Table 3], charred Calluna vulgaris and Juniperus communis leaves only occur with non-charred leaves of the same type, indicat-ing that they may have arrived as part of the non-charred assemblage and become charred once the material had been deposited in the settlement (although the low densi-ty of charred material recovered compared to non-charred
Acta Archaeologica
SAM
PLE
NU
MB
ER39
357
059
564
510
1616
2216
4116
8217
6017
6119
6319
6419
9520
5221
4722
1922
6524
2226
5326
5426
6527
1127
3427
5229
25N
UM
BER
OF
SAM
PLES
C
ON
TAIN
ING
TA
XA
BU
LK V
OLU
ME
(litre
s)1.
000.
50.
50.
50.
50.
51
0.5
2.00
0.5
0.5
3.00
0.8
2.40
10.
50.
50.
51
0.5
10.
50.
50M
ULT
IPLI
ED T
O1
1/2
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1/8
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1/8
11
1A
lope
curu
s gen
icul
a-tu
s L.
non-
char
red
303
1/4
11 1
/2
3
Atri
plex
gla
briu
scul
a Ed
mon
st.
char
red
8 1
cf. A
vena
sativ
ano
n-ch
arre
d1/
8 1
Bar
ley
cf. h
ulle
dch
arre
d13
/16
1B
arle
y in
det.
char
red
1 1/
8 4
Bar
ley
seed
coa
tno
n-ch
arre
d1
1B
etul
a sp
.no
n-ch
arre
d 5
/24
1cf
. Bor
agin
acea
eno
n-ch
arre
d1/
4 1
Bra
ssic
a sp
.no
n-ch
arre
d1/
8 2
Car
ex e
chin
ata
Mur
ray
char
red
1 1
Car
ex e
chin
ata
no
n-ch
arre
d4
2 1
3 13
/14
4 1/
5 14
15/
261/
8 3
8 3
/10
7 1/
2 2
2/5
1/3
19
5/1
218
0 7/
9 7/
8 6
21
Car
ex c
f. ec
hina
ta
non-
char
red
1/4
1
/2
12
2 6/
7 32
1/
106
1/8
7 1
/10
1/3
5
/8
4 22/2
71
1/2
17
Car
ex fl
ava-
type
char
red
8 1
Car
ex fl
ava-
type
non-
char
red
2 3/
4 1
1/2
1 1/
2 1
2 11
8
1/4
2 2
2 2
5/6
1 1/
2 15
Car
ex c
f. fl a
va (4
side
d)no
n-ch
arre
d1
Car
ex n
igra
-type
non-
char
red
3 1/
2 2
3C
arex
pal
lesc
ens L
.no
n-ch
arre
d1
Car
ex p
ilulif
era
L.ch
arre
d1
Car
ex p
ilulif
era
non-
char
red
4 2/
3 4
1/2
1 2
/3
22 2
/3
3 2/
3 1
2 1
12C
arex
cf.
pilu
lifer
ano
n-ch
arre
d 2
/3
3C
arex
rost
rata
Sto
kes
non-
char
red
1C
arex
cf.
rost
rata
char
red
1C
arex
cf.
rost
rata
non-
char
red
5/24
1 1/
2 2
Car
ex sp
. bic
onve
xno
n-ch
arre
d1
20
1 5/
247
Car
ex sp
.no
n-ch
arre
d 1
/4
8 1
5/24
5C
arex
trig
onou
s ind
et.
char
red
1/8
1
Car
ex tr
igon
ous i
ndet
.no
n-ch
arre
d1
5/2
68
1 4
cf. C
arum
car
vi L
.no
n-ch
arre
d1
1C
aryo
phyl
lace
ae in
det.
non-
char
red
1/2
1
/2
4 4
Cer
astiu
m sp
p.ch
arre
d 1
/2
1C
eras
tium
spp.
non-
char
red
187
1/4
20 1
/4
135
1/8
4
/5
4 4
3/8
1 1/
2 13
cf. C
eras
tium
sp. (
spik
y)no
n-ch
arre
d2
1cf
. Cer
astiu
m sp
p.no
n-ch
arre
d1/
201
Cer
eal g
rain
char
red
3 1/
2 1
/2
1/2
2
1/4
6
cf. c
erea
l gra
inch
arre
d 1
/4
3cf
. Cirs
ium
/Car
duus
non-
char
red
2 3
/8
1/4
3
Cor
ylus
ave
llana
L.
char
red
1
Tabl
e 3
SAM
PLE
NU
MB
ER39
357
059
564
510
1616
2216
4116
8217
6017
6119
6319
6419
9520
5221
4722
1922
6524
2226
5326
5426
6527
1127
3427
5229
25N
UM
BER
OF
SAM
PLES
C
ON
TAIN
ING
TA
XA
BU
LK V
OLU
ME
(litre
s)1.
000.
50.
50.
50.
50.
51
0.5
2.00
0.5
0.5
3.00
0.8
2.40
10.
50.
50.
51
0.5
10.
50.
50M
ULT
IPLI
ED T
O1
1/2
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1/8
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1/8
11
1C
oryl
us a
vella
nano
n-ch
arre
d2
Cyp
erac
eae
inde
t.no
n-ch
arre
d2
1C
yper
acea
e Ty
pe 2
Ech
arre
d 5
/28
2C
yper
acea
e Ty
pe 2
Eno
n-ch
arre
d1
1 6
1/8
1
1 1
8cf
. Des
cham
psia
cae
s-pi
tosa
char
red
1
Empe
trum
nig
rum
L.
char
red
1Em
petru
m n
igru
mno
n-ch
arre
d1
2 1
1 5
/24
5G
aleo
psis
sp(p
)ch
arre
d1
Gal
eops
is sp
(p)
non-
char
red
1 1
8 1/
104
1/8
1
1 5
/8
1/2
12
cf. G
aleo
psis
sp(p
)no
n-ch
arre
d 1
/2
1 2
4 1/
2 6
Gra
min
eae
grou
p 1
non-
char
red
20 5
/24
1G
ram
inea
e in
det -
sp
ikel
etch
arre
d 1
/2
2 1/
2 2
Gra
min
eae
inde
t. - i
n gl
umes
non-
char
red
1/8
1
Gra
min
eae
inde
t.ch
arre
d1
Gra
min
eae
inde
t.no
n-ch
arre
d96
1/
2 1
8 1/
2 32
4
40
2 3
3/8
12
6 5
10
2/3
20 7
/24
101
1/2
17
cf. G
ram
inea
eno
n-ch
arre
d4
8 2
4H
ippu
ris v
ulga
ris L
.no
n-ch
arre
d25
4 2
2 1/10
5 1/
3 5
/8
9 1/
8 6
Hor
deum
sp.
non-
char
red
1 1
Hul
led
barle
y cf
. tw
iste
dch
arre
d1
Hul
led
barle
y in
det.
char
red
2 9
/16
1 1/
2 1
/2
6H
ulle
d ba
rley
stra
ight
char
red
1H
ulle
d ba
rley
twis
ted
char
red
1H
yper
icum
pul
chru
m L
.no
n-ch
arre
d8
12
1/8
1
/2
1/2
8
1/2
1
/6
25/
48 1
/16
11H
yper
icum
pul
chru
m/
mac
ulat
umno
n-ch
arre
d 2
/5
1
Junc
us a
rticu
latu
s L.
non-
char
red
16
64
1 9
/10
4 40
96
8
Junc
us a
rticu
latu
s/bu
lbos
usno
n-ch
arre
d 4
/5
1
Junc
us b
ufon
ius L
.ch
arre
d 1
/8
1Ju
ncus
buf
oniu
sno
n-ch
arre
d80
64
2
2/5
4Ju
ncus
cf.
cong
lom
erat
usno
n-ch
arre
d1
1Ju
ncus
trifi
dus L
.no
n-ch
arre
d16
23
3
Junc
us tr
ifi du
s/bu
foni
usno
n-ch
arre
d 1
/10
1Ju
ncus
sp.
char
red
1/8
2
Junc
us sp
.no
n-ch
arre
d17
02
1/4
360
1/2
21
272
40
882
2/5
29 7
/13
8 3/
4 10
4 92
6
64
1/10
730
92
16
135
1/4
804
13/2
739
0 1/
4 43
23
Leon
todo
n au
tum
nalis
L.
non-
char
red
1Lu
zula
sp(p
)no
n-ch
arre
d 3
/8
20
1/2
013
8
1 12
4
/5
16
28 3
/4
56
1/2
14
cf. L
uzul
a sp
.no
n-ch
arre
d8
16
8 3
Lych
nis fl
os-
cucu
li L.
non-
char
red
1/4
1
/2
12
2 1
1/2
4
2/5
1/4
1
/3
17 1
/9
12
SAM
PLE
NU
MB
ER39
357
059
564
510
1616
2216
4116
8217
6017
6119
6319
6419
9520
5221
4722
1922
6524
2226
5326
5426
6527
1127
3427
5229
25N
UM
BER
OF
SAM
PLES
C
ON
TAIN
ING
TA
XA
BU
LK V
OLU
ME
(litre
s)1.
000.
50.
50.
50.
50.
51
0.5
2.00
0.5
0.5
3.00
0.8
2.40
10.
50.
50.
51
0.5
10.
50.
50M
ULT
IPLI
ED T
O1
1/2
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1/8
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1/8
11
1cf
. Lyc
hnis
fl os
-cuc
uli
non-
char
red
1/1
01
Men
yant
hes t
rifol
iata
L.
non-
char
red
1 1
cf. M
enya
nthe
s trif
olia
tano
n-ch
arre
d4
1 3
Mon
tia fo
ntan
a L.
char
red
1 9
2M
ontia
font
ana
non-
char
red
357
1/4
4 65
8 3/
4 21
9 1/
2 10
4 24
2
1 43
3 3/
5 14
2 2
168
362
30
15
1/2
38
2/5
16
2/3
99 5
/6
148
17/2
71
388
1/2
25
cf. M
ontia
font
ana
non-
char
red
11
2Po
a an
nua
L.no
n-ch
arre
d32
38
4
5/8
5Po
a an
nua
non-
char
red
2 8
3cf
. Poa
ann
uano
n-ch
arre
d8
6 2
cf. P
oa a
nnua
non-
char
red
1Po
a cf
. nem
oral
isno
n-ch
arre
d16
12
4
Poa
cf. p
rate
nsis
non-
char
red
4 4
2Po
a cf
. pra
tens
is/tr
ivia
lisno
n-ch
arre
d1
3/4
1Po
a sp
.no
n-ch
arre
d1
Poa
sp. (
blun
t end
)no
n-ch
arre
d1
2 12
4
Poa
sp. (
not a
nnua
)no
n-ch
arre
d7
4 3
Poly
gona
ceae
inde
t.no
n-ch
arre
d1
1Po
lygo
nace
ae sp
. (th
in
wal
led)
non-
char
red
3 1/
4 40
5
1/1
0 1
/3
5
Poly
gonu
m a
vicu
lare
L.
non-
char
red
2 1
2Po
lygo
num
sp.
char
red
2 1
/4
2Po
lygo
num
sp.
non-
char
red
16
3Po
lygo
num
Typ
e ?D
non-
char
red
1 1
2Po
lygo
num
Typ
e 12
non-
char
red
2 21
2
2/3
1/1
61
2 25
5
1/2
9Po
tent
illa
cran
tzii/
erec
tano
n-ch
arre
d2
25
1 5
/26
1 1/
2 9
2 1/
2 4
5/6
8 5/
276 1/
161
13
Pote
ntill
a cr
antz
ii/er
ecta
/pa
lust
risno
n-ch
arre
d2
2 2
Pote
ntill
a pa
lust
ris (L
.) Sc
op.
non-
char
red
5/2
71
Pote
ntill
a sp
.no
n-ch
arre
d0
Prun
ella
vul
garis
L.
non-
char
red
1/2
4
3cf
. Puc
inel
lia sp
char
red
1R
anun
culu
s acr
is/re
pens
char
red
1/8
1
Ran
uncu
lus a
cris
/repe
nsno
n-ch
arre
d10
3/
4 4
5 24
64
20
1
2 1
1 1/10
4 1/
4 1
1/4
1 17
Ran
uncu
lus fl
am
mul
a/re
ptan
sno
n-ch
arre
d3
1/2
26
1/2
1
1/2
4 29
4
1/8
1
1/2
1/2
1
1/2
2 1
1/2
2 5/
121
17
Ran
uncu
lus s
p.no
n-ch
arre
d1
1 8
5/5
2 1
/8
1/2
1
1/2
1
3/16
11cf
. Ran
uncu
lus s
p.no
n-ch
arre
d1
1R
hina
nthu
s gro
enla
ndi-
cus/
min
orno
n-ch
arre
d8
1 1
1 5
cf. R
osac
eae
sp. (
im-
mat
ure)
non-
char
red
1
SAM
PLE
NU
MB
ER39
357
059
564
510
1616
2216
4116
8217
6017
6119
6319
6419
9520
5221
4722
1922
6524
2226
5326
5426
6527
1127
3427
5229
25N
UM
BER
OF
SAM
PLES
C
ON
TAIN
ING
TA
XA
BU
LK V
OLU
ME
(litre
s)1.
000.
50.
50.
50.
50.
51
0.5
2.00
0.5
0.5
3.00
0.8
2.40
10.
50.
50.
51
0.5
10.
50.
50M
ULT
IPLI
ED T
O1
1/2
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1/8
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1/8
11
1R
umex
ace
tosa
/long
i-fo
lius
char
red
1 1
2 4
Rum
ex a
ceto
sa/lo
ngi-
foliu
sno
n-ch
arre
d1
1/2
18
1/2
3 48
4
14
1/2
1 5
/24
10 1
/2 1
2
Rum
ex c
f. ac
etos
a/lo
n-gi
foliu
sno
n-ch
arre
d2
1 2
Rum
ex a
ceto
sella
L.
non-
char
red
1R
umex
cris
pus/
obtu
si-
foliu
sch
arre
d1
Rum
ex c
rispu
s/ob
tusi
-fo
lius
non-
char
red
1 1
Rum
ex c
f. cr
ispu
s/ob
tu-
sifo
lius
non-
char
red
2 1
1 3
Rum
ex sp
.ch
arre
d2
5 4
4R
umex
sp.
non-
char
red
24
1/4
367
6 1/
6 4
48
1/8
7
10
1 65
5/
6 3
1/3
1 1
5/9
1/6
18
1/2
19
Rum
ex sp
. (ru
nty
<1m
m)
non-
char
red
96
16
2 1
5R
umex
sp. (
runt
y)no
n-ch
arre
d8
4 3
Rum
ex sp
. with
leav
esno
n-ch
arre
d46
16
2 26
7
5R
umex
trig
onou
s cor
ech
arre
d2
1/2
3
cf. R
umex
non-
char
red
1 2
Rum
ex/P
olyg
onum
non-
char
red
1/2
2
5 2
4Sa
gina
inte
rmed
ia/n
o-do
sa/s
ubul
ata
non-
char
red
48
1/2
26
6 8
8 48
0 26
4
8 3
8 40
4/
5 12
3 19
/27
16
73 1
/2 2
0
Sela
gine
lla se
lagi
noid
es
(L.)
Bea
uv. E
x M
art.
&
Schr
ank
non-
char
red
8 24
7 1/
3 21
1/
3 92
16
1/
1013
1/
3 1
4 4
8 8
1/8
1/2
15
Sper
gula
arv
ensi
s L.
char
red
8 13/1
61
1/2
5/2
84
Sper
gula
arv
ensi
sno
n-ch
arre
d8
5 4
1/2
9 6
4/5
4 17
5/6
2
9Sp
ergu
la-ty
peco
re c
harr
ed 1
/8
2Sp
ergu
la-ty
peno
n-ch
arre
d4
2 1
/3
22
29/4
85
Stel
laria
med
ia (L
.) V
ill.
char
red
7/1
614
3
Stel
laria
med
iano
n-ch
arre
d6
1/2
2 10
12
3/4
11
2
28
3/20
29 1
0/13
3 3/
4 12
34
2
9 1/
4 6
20
5/6
38 1
/4
2 1/16
7 22
cf. S
tella
ria m
edia
non-
char
red
1/2
8
2 5
/12
1 7
Tara
xacu
m sp
.no
n-ch
arre
d 1
/2
1V
iola
can
ina/
palu
stris
non-
char
red
2 1
2 5
/24
1/2
5
Vio
la ri
vini
ana
Rch
b.no
n-ch
arre
d3
1 1
1/2
1
/3
5V
iola
sp.
non-
char
red
2 1
2 1
1 1
8cf
. Um
belli
fera
ech
arre
d1
1Tr
igno
us se
ed in
det.
non-
char
red
4 1
Seed
inde
t no
n-ch
arre
d8
4 3
Seed
inde
t (in
ner c
ore?
)no
n-ch
arre
d 1
/2
1/8
2
cf. s
eed
char
red
1 1
SAM
PLE
NU
MB
ER39
357
059
564
510
1616
2216
4116
8217
6017
6119
6319
6419
9520
5221
4722
1922
6524
2226
5326
5426
6527
1127
3427
5229
25N
UM
BER
OF
SAM
PLES
C
ON
TAIN
ING
TA
XA
BU
LK V
OLU
ME
(litre
s)1.
000.
50.
50.
50.
50.
51
0.5
2.00
0.5
0.5
3.00
0.8
2.40
10.
50.
50.
51
0.5
10.
50.
50M
ULT
IPLI
ED T
O1
1/2
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1/8
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1/8
11
1TO
TAL
29
65
4/5
280
1/4
2041
1/
445
2 1/
634
2 61
0 1/
361
7/9
93
2196
3/
755
2 1/
566
5/
834
2 1/
656
8 75
83
4/
596
3 5/
621
0 3/
712
3 1/
656
0 5/
912
63
8/9
607
1/3
9
3/8
591
Stig
ma/
Stam
enno
n-ch
arre
d18
9/
161
Cal
luna
vul
garis
L. s
eed
caps
ule
non-
char
red
45
2 1
3
Type
6 n
ode
char
red
1 1
2R
achi
s/cu
lm (g
rass
)ch
arre
d2
2?G
rass
nod
ule
from
root
/jo
int
non-
char
red
1 1
Cul
m n
ode
char
red
1 1
Cul
m n
ode
non-
char
red
1 1
Cha
ff (g
rass
)no
n-ch
arre
d1
Cor
ylus
nut
shel
lno
n-ch
arre
d1
Vio
la se
ed c
apsu
le
segm
ent
non-
char
red
1 2
Salix
bud
non-
char
red
1 1
Cal
luna
vul
garis
leav
esno
n-ch
arre
d1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 12
Cal
luna
vul
garis
leav
esch
arre
d1
1Ju
nipe
rus c
omm
unis
L.
twig
(seg
men
ts)
non-
char
red
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 10
Juni
peru
s com
mun
is le
afno
n-ch
arre
d1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 12
Juni
peru
s com
mun
is le
afch
arre
d1
1 2
Gra
ss n
ode
non-
char
red
1 1
cf. P
olyg
onac
eae
leafl
et/
scal
eno
n-ch
arre
d1
Cul
m n
ode
char
red
1Le
athe
r stri
pno
n-ch
arre
d1
1H
air/fi
bre
non-
char
red
1 1
Egg
shel
l mem
bran
eno
n-ch
arre
d1
2B
ival
ve p
ereo
stra
chum
non-
char
red
1 1
Mos
sno
n-ch
arre
d3
1 2
4 2
5 Sp
hag-
num
3 1
1 3
2 1
1 1
1 1
5 Spha
g-nu
m
4 5 Sp
hag-
num
19
Peat
nod
ules
char
red
5 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 17
Peat
nod
ules
non-
char
red
5 1
?1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
21?s
eaw
eed
char
red
1 1
1 1
1 6
Snai
l she
ll op
ercu
lano
n-ch
arre
d1
Ston
esno
n-ch
arre
d1
1 1
1 4
?hor
nno
n-ch
arre
d1
Iron
pan
frag
men
tsno
n-ch
arre
d1
1W
ood
ratin
gno
n-ch
arre
d1
1 1
1 3
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
21C
harc
oal
char
red
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 20
138
5 Metres
N
House II floor west
House II drain
House II, phase 3
Between I and II
Outside House II
Pre-landnam
House II
18th century
1582
2265
2219 2052 570
1963
2147
1016
1964 2422
1995
1399
6451475
2752
2653
16821761
2654
2711
1622
2925
1597
2665 2734 1641
1400 395
595
Fig. 129. Plan of Toftanes with samples represented as pie charts showing the charred (black) and non-charred (white) seed component. Samples located with arrows indicate approximate location based on context description. All seeds are included in the counts.
5.10.1-
0.35.0-
5.15.1-
0.40.1- algen
caech
cafla
canig
capil
caros
ch casp
caryo
cerassp
ch cergr
cirscaa
cyp2e
emp
galspch gram
gram
hipphypjuncab
juncbufjuncsp
junctrif
luzsp
lychfc
mentrifmontfont
poaa
poanp
polysp
poly12
potce
pruvulg
ranar
ranfr
ransp rhin
rumal
ch rumal
rumco
rumsp
ch rumsp
rumsmall sagi
indet
selsel
sperga
ch sperg
stmed
ch stmed
viocp
vior
viosp
1964
2653
1399 2147
1622
1963
2654
1400
2265 2422
1597 645
2925
1995
Fig. 130. Graphical representation of results of canonical analysis on samples from Toftanes. All samples containing more than 30 counts were analysed, and all taxa present in more than 10% of samples. a) showing samples represented as pie charts categorised by charred (black) and non-charred (white) seed component. Samples with a charred seed component are labelled with their sample number; b) Charred types are labelled in bold script and with
black triangles, non-charred types are labelled in italics with white triangles.
Acta Archaeologica
139
material indicates that this does not appear to have hap-pened frequently). Charcoal occurs in the same samples as non-charred wood in 89% of the samples (this is based on unidentifi ed wood and twigs, as the level of identifi ca-tion for the non-charred wood was sometimes poor), and charred peat/dung nodules occur in 94% of the same sam-ples as non-charred ones. Wood and peat/dung are both likely to have been used as fuel. Although they would generally have been burned to ash, the close proximity of these materials to fi re on a regular basis would have meant that some material was likely to charred and there-fore to survive archaeologically. Although they may have become charred in a similar way to the leaves discussed above, it is likely that the high percentage of their occur-rence in conjunction with non-charred material is a factor of their widespread presence at the site (86% and 77% of samples containing charred material). Charred and non-charred wood and peat/dung nodules may occur together simply because they are all present in a high number of samples, and may not necessarily originate from a com-mon source. The only identifi cation category to occur independently of non-charred material is seaweed. This is highly likely to be due to preservation - non-charred seaweed is very unlikely to survive, even with very good levels of preservation. Fragments of burnt bone were also recovered from two samples, but they were too small to be identifi able. These may represent another fuel at the site or waste from cooking.
THE NON-CHARRED ASSEMBLAGEThe non-charred seed assemblage was analysed by cor-respondence analysis. All charred seed types were ex-cluded from the analysis, as were types which could not be assigned to habitat association categories. Sam-ples were not included if, after removing the charred and unassigned types, they contained less than 30 items (samples 393, 1475, 1682, 1964, 2147, 2219, 2734 and 2752 were not included for this reason). All seed types included were present in at least 10% of the analysed samples. This resulted in 19 samples and 33 types and the plot [Fig. 131] shows several samples with a high score on at least one axis due to a high proportion of Hippuris vulgaris in sample 1641, and Selaginella selaginoides in samples 595 and 1760. These were excluded from subse-quent analyses to allow more detailed investigation of the remaining samples. Samples were categorised by archae-ological context, and plant macrofossil types by habitat
association; the results are represented as pie charts. The classifi cation of Montia fontana ssp. fontana, the most commonly occurring seed type, is problematic. It may have originated from a number of sources, including as a component of turves or in ruderal communities around the settlement. The correspondence analysis plots M. fon-tana ssp. fontana in association with taxa which tend to occur in a range of habitats, especially those that tend to be present in hayfi elds, although this may just be an indi-cation that all are commonly occurring species.
The majority of samples were situated in a single spread drawn out along the fi rst axis [Fig. 132, but also see Fig. 131]. The fi rst axis differentiates at the positive end the samples with a higher contribution from types as-sociated with the less fertile soil conditions of the outfi eld and the nutrient-poor or nutrient-intermediate wet soils or water [Fig. 132]. Most of the samples have low or nega-tive values on the fi rst axis, and tend to have a greater contribution of taxa from nutrient-rich habitats such as ruderal areas and hayfi elds. The pattern of samples on the second axis seems to distinguish the ruderal component which is more signifi cant at the positive end. Samples 570 (outside area between Building I and House II) and 1400 (House II, phase 3, fl oor) are located at the positive end of the second axis, due to the high proportion of Alo-pecurus geniculatus (water foxtail) and Juncus bufonius (toad rush) in 570 and J. bufonius in 1400.
The samples located at the positive end of the fi rst axis (samples 2711, 2665, 1622, 2653 and 2654) and the second axis (samples 570 and 1400) were excluded as they were responsible for the most signifi cant differ-ence between samples in the previous analysis. Alopecu-rus geniculatus, Hippuris vulgaris and Rhinanthus minor (yellow rattle) were also removed as they were present in less than 10% of the remaining samples. The analysis was then repeated. Samples 1399, 1963 and 2265 were dif-ferentiated from the rest of the samples by high positive values on the fi rst axis [Fig. 132]. They had a higher pro-portions of taxa occurring in various habitats but tending to occur in hayfi elds and lower proportions of M. fontana ssp. fontana than other samples [Fig. 133].
Various kinds of non-charred vegetative material were present in the Toftanes samples. The matrix of sev-eral samples (1682 from outside Building I, and 2665 and 2734 from the pre-occupation deposits) was dominated by Sphagnum. This may have been naturally present in the area, although it would be unusual to build a house
Toftanes. A Viking Age Farmstead in the Faroe Islands
140
on an area of land wet enough for Sphagnum to grow ex-tensively.
Samples taken from the interior of the buildings, es-pecially from the fl oors, contain the greatest diversity of vegetative material. Wood and twigs were generally pre-sent in the fl oors, but they only dominated the matrix of sample 1995. Twigs and fragments of dwarf shrubs which would have grown locally, Calluna vulgaris, Salix sp. (willow), Juniper communis and possibly Betula (birch) sp., were recovered both charred and non-charred, whilst non-native types, Picea/Pinus (spruce/pine) and possi-bly Quercus (oak) sp., were found non-charred. Several pieces of J. communis and both of the non-native taxa exhibited cut marks. This seems to indicate that, whilst local wood resources were used as fuel (as well as for
other purposes that did not involve contact with fi re), non-local types were not. Wood and twigs were present in the majority of samples in similar quantities. The richest sample in terms of wood content was located in Building I (sample 1995), and contained a concentration of twigs (predominantly non-charred Calluna vulgaris, with some charred C. vulgaris and J. communis) and moss. This could indicate storage of resources before use, their ac-cidental incorporation into the fl oor due to use in the area, deliberate incorporation to level the fl oor or absorb liq-uid, or the collapse of roof material (some of which may have been charred by lamp fl ames or sooty deposits on the thatch (cf. Letts 1999) during abandonment.
The leaves, seed capsules and twigs of Calluna vul-garis and the leaves and twig segments of Juniperus
Fig. 131. Graphical representation of results of canonical analysis. 19 samples and 33 types were included in the analysis. Samples containing less than 30 items were excluded (samples 393, 1475, 1682, 1964, 2147, 2219, 2734 and 2752) as were seed types present in less than 10% of the samples.
Samples are marked with circles and types with crosses. Hipp indicates Hippuris vulgaris, selsel indicates Selaginella selaginoides.
Acta Archaeologica
141
a)
b)Fig. 132. Graphical representation of results of canonical analysis on samples from Toftanes. Only samples containing more than 30 items were analysed, and the outlying samples from Fig. 131 (595, 1641 and 1760) were excluded. All taxa present in more than 10% of samples were included. a) plot of samples categorised by archaeological context. See Fig. 125 for key; b) plot showing samples represented as pie charts based on the seed
component of the samples, with taxa categorised by their habitat association category. See Fig. 125 for key.
Toftanes. A Viking Age Farmstead in the Faroe Islands
142
a)
b)
Fig. 133. Graphical representation of results of canonical analysis on samples from Toftanes. Only samples containing more than 30 items were analysed, and the outlying samples from Fig. 131 and 132 (570, 595, 1400, 1622, 1641, 1760, 2653, 2654, 2665 and 2711) were excluded. All taxa present in more than 10% of samples were included. a) plot of samples categorised by archaeological context. See Fig. 125 for key; b) plot showing samples represented
as pie charts based on the seed component of the samples, with taxa categorised by their habitat association category. See Fig 125 for key.
Acta Archaeologica
143
communis are almost entirely confi ned to samples from within the buildings. They are likely to have been brought to the site from the dwarf shrub heath attached to twigs, and indicate that the twigs were not stripped of their leaves and other attachments prior to being brought into the settlement. They may have been brought to the site for construction, fl oor-lining or other purposes within the settlement. Leaves, seed capsules and twigs of Calluna vulgaris and Juniperus communis are less frequent in the abandonment phase of House II, which may indicate that their use was more often associated with occupa-tion, rather than the construction of the building itself, although the presence of a juniper rope with a weight at-tached, interpreted as a roof weight, may be evidence of its use in construction (Larsen 1991).
The fl oors contain evidence for the use of other re-sources at the site. Charred and non-charred nodules of peat/dung were present in most samples, and dominate the matrix of samples 393 and 1475. In areas poor in other sources of fuel, sheep dung was widely burnt (e.g. Miller & Smart 1984).
7.2. WOOD REMAINS FROM TOFTANESKJELD CHRISTENSEN
INTRODUCTIONDue to excellent conditions for the preservation of wood the excavations at Toftanes produced abundant wooden fragments and objects [Note 41]. Approximately two hundred of these were of excellent quality and sent for conservation to the Watterlogged Wood Conservation Department of the National Museum of Denmark. In con-nection with the conservation, the objects were identifi ed by Nancy Eskildsen.
A special group of wooden objects was that of juniper ropes. These fi nds were conserved during the excavation in Leirvík, and were preliminarily published by Larsen (1991).
A grant from the Danish Research Council for the Hu-manities in 1996 allowed the present author to examine a further 150 samples from Toftanes [Note 42].
The results of the investigation are presented in Tables 4 and 5. An anatomical differentiation between Picea sp. and Larix sp. is diffi cult (Philips 1948; Bartholin 1979), and not attempted here; if necessary, it can be performed
later, as a small sample is preserved from all the investi-gated objects.
In the following the information on the present ap-pearance of the tree-species in the Faroes is based on Ostenfeld & Gröntved (1934), unless otherwise stated. Information on pollen fi nds is based on Jóhansen (1982; 1985), information on wood fi nds on Jóhansen (1985) and Malmros (1990; 1994). Information on driftwood derives from Ingvarson (1903), Scott (1951), Graham (1952), Dickson (1992) and Eggertson (1993). The ques-tion of import of wood has been discussed by Stummann Hansen (1988; 1996b) and Small (1969; 1970).
LOCAL SPECIESOf the identifi ed coniferous trees/shrubs, only juniper grows in the Faroes (cf. chapter 4.6.12). The samples from Toftanes are regarded as being of local origin.
Of the deciduous trees dwarf-willow (Salix herba-cea L.) and the low shrub species tea-leaved willow (S. phylicifolia L.) and gray willow (S. glauca L.) grows naturally in the Faroes. On the other hand no tree-form willow-species (for instance bay willow, S. pentandra L, and crack willow, S. fragilis L) grow here, and according to palynlogical investigations this was also the situation in the Viking Age. The samples of willow all derive from house posts or stakes and were unlikely to derive from the local shrub vegetation. It must therefore be assumed that these samples are from tree trunks which have come to the Faroes from the outside.
Hazel does not grow naturally in the islands today but was probably there in the Viking Age. Hazel nuts have been found on most Viking Age sites in the Faroes, and a hazel trunk with chipping marks in the lower end was found at Argisbrekka. As hazel nuts do not spread with ocean currents, Malmros (1994) concluded that hazel was cultivated in the islands in the Viking Age, although on a small scale, as the species is not represented in pollen diagrams. Three samples of hazel were identifi ed in the material from Toftanes. Two of these were small, three-year old twigs from the same context number. The third piece was a fragment of a c. 3 cm thick, nine-year old trunk or branch. Thus the fi nds from Toftanes would seem to substantiate the assumption that hazel grew in the Far-oes in the Viking period.
The European aspen (Populus sp.) does not grow naturally in the Faroes today, and wood from this species seems not to have been identifi ed in the islands previous-
Toftanes. A Viking Age Farmstead in the Faroe Islands