λ vehicles provide new tools for genetic analysis of Gram-negative bacteria

4
MicrobialPathogenesis1987 ;3 :227-230 Mini-review ;, vehiclesprovidenewtoolsforgeneticanalysisof Gram-negativebacteria E .TapioPalva,'AnuHarkki, 2 HannaKarkku, 3 HannuLang'and MinnaPirhonen' 'DepartmentofMolecularGenetics,SwedishUniversityofAgriculturalSciences,Box 7003,S-75007Uppsala,Sweden ; 2 BiotechnicalLaboratory,TheTechnicalResearch CentreofFinland,SF-02150Espoo,Finland ;and'DepartmentofGenetics,Universityof Helsinki,SF-00100Helsinki,Finland Thesuccessof Escherichiacoil asamodelforprobingfundamentalbiologicalproblems dependstoagreatextentontheadvancedgenetictoolsavailableforthisorganism . Bacteriophage iA isoneofthepowerfulresearchtoolsavailablefor E. coil molecular genetics .ItprovidesthevehicleforvectorialtranslocationofexogenousDNAinto recipientcellsandiscommonlyusedassuchintransposonmutagenesis,cosmid cloningand invivo generationofgenefusions .Untilrecentlytheutilityof1vehicles hasbeenlargelylimitedto E. coil. However,recentresults 1-6 stronglysuggestthat thesetechniquescouldbereadilyappliedtomanydifferentGram-negativebacteria . TheA,receptor Manyoftheapplicationsof A vehiclesrequireonlytheexpressionofafunctional phagereceptorinthebacterialoutermembrane .Thereceptorfunctionisencodedby the lamB gene', 'inthemaltoseregulonin E.coli. 9 Thisgenecodesforamajorouter membraneprotein,LamB .'LamBisclassifiedasaporinandfacilitatesthepermeation ofmaltodextrinsthroughtheoutermembrane .'"' Expressionof A receptorinGram-negativebacteria Innature7receptoractivityhasbeenonlydetectedin E . coil andincertainMal` strainsof Shige/la and Enterobacter. 12-13 However,duetotheuncomplicatednature ofthe A receptor,asingleoutermembraneprotein,transferofthisfunctiontoother Gram-negativebacteriabecomesfeasible .Anindicationthatthe E.coliA receptor couldfunctioninotherentericbacteriawasprovidedbytheconstructionof E.coli- Salmonellatyphi hybridsthatweresusceptibleto A adsorption ." The lamB geneof E .coli wasfirstintroducedtoS . typhimurium onanF'factorand showntobeexpressedandtoprovideafunctionalphagereceptorinitsnewhost .' Thisearlysuccesswithextendingthehostrangeof a to Salmonella hasrecentlyled totheconstructionofseveral lamB expressionplasmidsthathavebeenintroducedto otherGram-negativebacteriaincluding S.typhimurium,Klebsiellapneumoniae,Vibrio cholerae and Erwiniacarotovora . 3-6 Inallofthesecases lamB geneisexpressedand theresultingbacterialstrainsproduceafunctional A receptor .Theonlyexceptionso 0882-4010/87/010227+04$03 .00/0 ©1987AcademicPressLtd

Transcript of λ vehicles provide new tools for genetic analysis of Gram-negative bacteria

Microbial Pathogenesis 1987 ; 3: 227-230

Mini-review

;, vehicles provide new tools for genetic analysis ofGram-negative bacteria

E . Tapio Palva,' Anu Harkki, 2 Hanna Karkku,3 Hannu Lang' andMinna Pirhonen'

'Department of Molecular Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box7003, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden; 2Biotechnical Laboratory, The Technical ResearchCentre of Finland, SF-02150 Espoo, Finland; and 'Department of Genetics, University ofHelsinki, SF-00 100 Helsinki, Finland

The success of Escherichia coil as a model for probing fundamental biological problemsdepends to a great extent on the advanced genetic tools available for this organism .Bacteriophage iA is one of the powerful research tools available for E. coil moleculargenetics. It provides the vehicle for vectorial translocation of exogenous DNA intorecipient cells and is commonly used as such in transposon mutagenesis, cosmidcloning and in vivo generation of gene fusions . Until recently the utility of 1 vehicleshas been largely limited to E. coil. However, recent results 1-6 strongly suggest thatthese techniques could be readily applied to many different Gram-negative bacteria .

The A, receptor

Many of the applications of A vehicles require only the expression of a functionalphage receptor in the bacterial outer membrane . The receptor function is encoded bythe lamB gene',' in the maltose regulon in E. coli. 9 This gene codes for a major outermembrane protein, LamB .' LamB is classified as a porin and facilitates the permeationof maltodextrins through the outer membrane .'"'

Expression of A receptor in Gram-negative bacteria

In nature 7 receptor activity has been only detected in E. coil and in certain Mal`strains of Shige/la and Enterobacter. 12-13 However, due to the uncomplicated natureof the A receptor, a single outer membrane protein, transfer of this function to otherGram-negative bacteria becomes feasible. An indication that the E. coli A receptorcould function in other enteric bacteria was provided by the construction of E. coli-Salmonella typhi hybrids that were susceptible to A adsorption."The lamB gene of E. coli was first introduced to S . typhimurium on an F'factor and

shown to be expressed and to provide a functional phage receptor in its new host .'This early success with extending the host range of a to Salmonella has recently ledto the construction of several lamB expression plasmids that have been introduced toother Gram-negative bacteria including S.typhimurium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Vibriocholerae and Erwinia carotovora . 3-6 In all of these cases lamB gene is expressed andthe resulting bacterial strains produce a functional A receptor. The only exception so

0882-4010/87/010227+04 $03.00/0

© 1987 Academic Press Ltd

228 E . T. Palva et al.

L B

Fig. 1 . Expression of /amB gene in Gram-negative bacteria . Cell envelope fractions of the bacteriaindicated were analyzed by SDS-PAGE: E. co/i (lanes 1 and 2), S . typhimurium (lanes 3 and 4), Erwiniacarotovora (lanes 5 and 6) and V. cho/erae (lanes 7 and 8) . The bacteria indicated by + harbor the lamBexpression plasmid pAMH62," except for E. coil (lanes 1 and 2) where + indicates cells grown in thepresence of Maltose.

far has been Pseudomonas aeruginosa where no 2 receptor activity was detected . 3The ompR promoter of E. co/i that we have employed to express /amB4 appears to befunctional in several Gram-negative bacteria, including S.typhimurium,° V. cholerae, 6Erwinia carotovora (Fig. 1), and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (unpublished results fromthis laboratory) . This suggests that the /amB gene can be expressed in a wide varietyof Gram-negative bacteria, and consequently the host range of 2 could be extendedto these species .

Transposon mutagenesis

The most immediate advantage of using lamB+ derivatives of Gram-negative bacteriahas been in the generation of transposon mutants .' 3,5 This has been succesfullyaccomplished in all bacteria expressing lamB.'- 3,5 The frequencies of transposition havebeen considerably lower than comparable frequencies in E. co/i, but still fully sufficientto generate transposon pools in these bacteria . The lower frequencies are probably dueto restriction of the incoming DNA . This can be partly compensated for by increasingthe multiplicity of infection .' As 2 cannot grow in most Gram-negative bacteria thekilling effect on the host is reduced .' Therefore A can be used as a true suicide vector .Another way to compensate for the lower transposition frequency is the use of thehigh hopper derivatives of 2 . 15 Using these tricks comparable or nearly comparablefrequencies to those in E. coli have been obtained .`

Other methods for delivery of transposons to Gram-negative bacteria have beendeveloped and succesfully employed, e .g . in Erwinia, Rhizobium and Agrobacterium,mostly by employing suicide plasmids . 16-19 However, the use of A vehicles fortransposon introduction offers several advantages: (1) a wide variety of transposonswith different selectable markers carried on ., vehicles are available ; 15 (2) themutagenesis is extremely easy to perform as this only involves 2 phage infection andselection for the transposon mutants; (3) the mutagenesis is clean as no unwantedinsertions of additional elements, i .e. Mu in PJB4JI mediated mutagenesis, takes place

Genetic analysis of Gram-negative bacteria

229

that would hamper the genetic analysis of the insertion mutants ; (4) it allows the useof other applications of the transposon technology such as gene fusions (see below)and generation of deletions ; (5) it should be generally applicable to all Gram-negativebacteria that can express lamB .

Cosmid cloning

Another important feature of the widened host range of 2 is that I vehicles can beemployed for cosmid cloning and transduction in these bacteria .""' Although thisapplication has not yet been fully realized it should offer important advantages inconstruction of gene libraries and cloning genes by complementation of mutants aftercosmid transduction . All of the LamB producing derivatives of Gram-negative bacteriaconstructed so far have been shown to function as recipients for cosmidtransduction ." 3.6 Consequently direct cosmid cloning into these bacteria becomesfeasible and the use of E. coil as a primary host is no more required . We are employingthis application of 2 technology to clone chromosomal genes of Erwinia and Vibrio bycomplementation of mutants in these bacteria .

Gene fusions

Gene fusions generated in vivo have proven to be of importance in analysis of geneexpression and protein localization . 20 Again, some of the more recent fusion vectorsavailable are based on 1 vehicles or utilize A vehicles to provide for transpositionfunctions."

Consequently lamB+ strains of Gram-negative bacteria could be used as recipientsfor fusion mutagenesis . This application has not yet been utilized to any great extentexcept for S.typhimurium (Harkki, Karkku and Palva, in preparation) . The reason beingpartly that several fusion vectors have been developed that employ other bacteriophagesor plasmid vehicles, and the host range of these techniques has been expanded toinclude many Gram-negative bacteria . 22 .23 In addition, the A fusion vectors result inthe integration of a transducing phage next to the gene fusion thus requiring hoststhat .? can lysogenize .

Growth and lysogeny of A is dependent on certain host functions of E. coli, the bestcharacterized being the function provided by the nusA gene prod uct . 2a-26 The NusAprotein appears to be involved in the antitermination of A transcription .21-2' Therefore,introduction of lamB alone is not sufficient but e .g . in S.typhimurium also the E. co/inusA gene is required . 2 Whether these two genes would be sufficient in other Gram-negative bacteria remains to be seen . The advantage, again, of the A vehicle approachis the simplicity by which the fusions could be generated and isolated . An inherentproperty of the A fusion vectors is that the gene/promotor of interest can be directlycloned by isolation of a 2 transducing phage .

Conclusions

In conclusion, the available data demonstrates that extension of the host range ofbacteriophage 2 to many Gram-negative bacteria is feasible . This should open up newavenues for the molecular genetic analysis of these bacteria as the powerful researchtools provided by the use of 2 vehicles become available .

230

E. T. Palva et al.

We thank Rose-Marie Andersson for typing this manuscript. This research has been supportedby the Academy of Finland and the Swedish Medical Research Council (project 07487) .

References

1 . Palva ET, Liljestrom P, Harayama S. Cosmid cloning and transposon mutagenesis in Salmonellatyphimurium using phage d vehicles . Mol Gen Genet 1981 ; 181 : 153-7 .

2 . Harkki A, Palva ET . Application of phage lambda technology to Salmonella typhimurium : constructionof a lambda-sensitive Salmonella strain. Mol Gen Genet 1984; 195: 256-9 .

3 . De Vries GE, Raymond CK, Ludwig RA . Extension of bacteriophage A host range : selection, cloningand characterization of a constitutive receptor gene . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984 ; 81 : 6080-4 .

4. Harkki A, Palva ET . A lamB expression plasmid for extending the host range of phage 2 to otherenterobacteria . FEMS Microbiol Lett 1985; 27 : 183-7 .

5. Salmond GPC, Hinton JCD, Gill DR, Perombelon MCM . Transposon mutagenesis of Erwinia usingphage A vectors . Mol Gen Genet 1986; 203: 524-8 .

6. Harkki A, Hirst TR, Homgren J, Palva ET. Expression of Escherichia coli lamB gene in Vibrio cholerae .Microbial Pathogenesis 1986 ; 1 : 283-8 .

7. Randall-Hazelbauer L, Schwartz M . Isolation of bacteriophage lambda receptor from Escherichia co/i.J Bacteriol 1973 ; 116: 1436-46.

8. Schwartz M. Reversible interaction between coliphage Lambda and its receptor protein . J Mol Biol1975; 99 :185-201 .

9. Debarboille M, Shuman HA, Silhavy TJ, Schwartz M . Dominant constitutive mutations in malT, thepositive regulator of the maltose regulon in Escherichia co/i. J Mol Biol 1978 ; 24: 359-71 .

10. Szmelcman S, Schwartz M, Silhavy TJ, Boos W . Maltose transport in Escherichia co/i K12. A comparisonof transport kinetics in wild-type and A resistant mutants with the dissociation constants of the maltose-binding protein as measured by fluorescence quenching . Eur J Biochem 1976 ; 65 : 13-9 .

11 . Nikaido H, Vaara M. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability . Microbiol Rev 1985 ;49: 1-32 .

12. Schwartz M, Le Minor L . Occurrence of the bacteriophage lambda receptor in some Enterobacteriaceae .J Virol 1975 ; 15 : 679-85 .

13. Bloch M-A, Desaymard C . Antigenic polymorphism of the LamB protein among members of the familyEnterobacteriaceae. J Bacteriol 1985 ; 163: 106-10 .

14. Baron LS, Penido E, Ryman IR, Falkow S . Behaviour of coliphage lambda in hybrids betweenEscherichia co/i and Salmonella . J Bacteriol 1970; 102 : 221-33 .

15. Way JC, Davis MA, Morisato D, Roberts DE, Kleckner N . New TnlO derivatives for transposonmutagenesis and for construction of lacZ operon fusions by transposition . Gene 1984; 32 : 369-79 .

16. Beringer JE, Benyon JL, Buchanan-Wollaston AV, Johnston AWB . Transfer of the transposon Tn5 toRhizobium. Nature 1978; 276: 633-4 .

17. Robinson MK, Bennet PM, Falkow S, Dodd HM. Isolation of a temperature-sensitive derivative ofRP1 . Plasmid 1980 ; 3 : 343-7 .

18. Altenbuchner J, Schmid K, Schmitt R . Tn1721-encoded tetracycline resistance : mapping of structuraland regulatory genes mediating resistance . J Bacteriol 1983 ; 153 : 116-23 .

19. Berg DE, Berg CM . The prokaryotic transposable element Tn5 . Bio/Technology 1983; July: 417-35 .20. Silhavy TJ, Beckwith JR . Use of lac fusions for the study of biological problems . Microbiol Rev

1985; 49 : 398-418 .21 . Bremer E, Silhavy TJ, Weinstock GM . Transposable A placMu bacteriophages for creating lacZ operon

fusions and kanamycin resistance insertions in Escherichia coil. J Bacteriol 1985 ; 162 : 1092-9 .22. Bellofatto V, Shapiro L, Hogson DA. Generation of a Tn5 promotor probe and its use in the study of

gene expression in Caulobacter crescentus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984; 81 : 1035-9 .23. Stachel SE, An G, Flores C, Nester EW . ATn3lacZ transposon for random generation of fl-galactosidase

gene fusions : application to the analysis of gene expression in Agrobacterium . EMBO J 1985; 4 : 891-8 .

24. Friedman DI. A bacterial mutant affecting lambda development . In : Hershey AD, ed . The bacteriophagelambda. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1971 ; 733-8 .

25. Das A, Wolska K . Transcription antitermination in vitro by lambda N gene product : requirement for aphage nut site and the products of host nusA, nusB and nusE genes. Cell 1984 ; 38 : 165-73 .

26. Goda Y, Greenblatt l . Efficient modification of E. coil RNA polymerase in vitro by the N gene transcriptionantitermination protein of bacteriophage lambda . Nucleic Acids Res 1985 ; 13: 2569-82.