Συνέντευξη ή παρατήρηση

15
«™˘Ó¤ÓÙ¢ÍË ‹ ·Ú·Ù‹ÚËÛË;»: ∏ ¤Ú¢ӷ ÛÙË Û¯ÔÏÈ΋ Ù¿ÍË ∫ÒÛÙ·˜ ª¿ÁÔ˜, ∆.∂.∞.¶.∏. ¶·ÓÂÈÛÙËÌ›Ô˘ ∞ıËÓÒÓ «∏ ÂÈÛÙËÌÔÓÈ΋ ¤Ú¢ӷ ÁÈ· fiÛ· Û˘Ì‚·›ÓÔ˘Ó Û ÌÈ· Û¯ÔÏÈ΋ Ù¿ÍË Â›Ó·È Î¿ÙÈ Ô˘ ÂÂÈÁfiÓÙˆ˜ ¯ÚÂÈ·˙fiÌ·ÛÙÂ, ·ÏÏ¿ ·Ú¿ÏÏËÏ· ÁÓˆÚ›˙Ô˘Ì fiÙÈ Â›Ó·È ‰‡ÛÎÔÏË ÙfiÛÔ Ô˘ ÙË ÊÔ‚fiÌ·ÛÙ» (McIntyre, 1996, Û. 20) ¶ÂÚ›ÏË„Ë ŒÓ·˜ ÌÂÁ¿ÏÔ˜ ·ÚÈıÌfi˜ ÂÚ¢ÓÒÓ ˘ÏÔÔÈÔ‡ÓÙ·È Ù· ÙÂÏÂ˘Ù·›· ¯ÚfiÓÈ· ̤۷ ÛÙȘ Û¯Ô- ÏÈΤ˜ Ù¿ÍÂȘ. Ÿˆ˜ ˘ÔÛÙËÚ›˙Ô˘Ó ÔÏÏÔ› ¤ÌÂÈÚÔÈ ÂÚ¢ÓËÙ¤˜, Ë ¤Ú¢ӷ Ù˘ Û¯ÔÏÈ- ΋˜ Ù¿Í˘ ¤¯ÂÈ ÙȘ ‰ÈΤ˜ Ù˘ ȉȷÈÙÂÚfiÙËÙ˜ Î·È ‰˘ÛÎÔϛ˜. ŒÓ·˜ ÛËÌ·ÓÙÈÎfi˜ ·Ú¿ÁÔÓÙ·˜ ÁÈ· ÙË Û˘ÏÏÔÁ‹ ¤ÁÎ˘ÚˆÓ Î·È ·ÍÈfiÈÛÙˆÓ ÂÚ¢ÓËÙÈÎÒÓ ‰Â‰ÔÌ¤ÓˆÓ ·fi ÙË Û¯ÔÏÈ΋ Ù¿ÍË ·ÔÙÂÏ› Ë ÂÈÏÔÁ‹ Ù˘ ηٿÏÏËÏ˘ ÂÚ¢ÓËÙÈ΋˜ ÌÂıÔ‰ÔÏÔ- Á›·˜ Î·È ÙˆÓ ·ÓÙ›ÛÙÔȯˆÓ ÂÚ¢ÓËÙÈÎÒÓ ÂÚÁ·Ï›ˆÓ. ™ÙÔ ¿ÚıÚÔ ·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ¿˙ÂÙ·È Ô ÁÂÓÈÎfiÙÂÚÔ˜ ÚÔ‚ÏËÌ·ÙÈÛÌfi˜ Ô˘ ·ÊÔÚ¿ ÙËÓ ·ÍÈÔÔ›ËÛË ÔÈÔÙÈÎÒÓ ‹/Î·È ÔÛÔ- ÙÈÎÒÓ ÂÚ¢ÓËÙÈÎÒÓ ÌÂıfi‰ˆÓ ÁÈ· ÙËÓ ¤Ú¢ӷ Ù˘ Û¯ÔÏÈ΋˜ Ù¿Í˘ Î·È ÚÔÛÂÁÁ›˙Ô- ÓÙ·È ÙÚÂȘ ÂÚ¢ÓËÙÈΤ˜ Ù¯ÓÈΤ˜: Ë Û˘Ó¤ÓÙ¢ÍË, Ë Û˘ÌÌÂÙÔ¯È΋ ·Ú·Ù‹ÚËÛË Î·È Ë Û˘ÛÙËÌ·ÙÈ΋ ‹ ‰ÔÌË̤ÓË ·Ú·Ù‹ÚËÛË. ∆· ÙÂÏÂ˘Ù·›· ¯ÚfiÓÈ· ¤¯ÂÈ ·˘ÍËı› ÛËÌ·ÓÙÈο Ô ·ÚÈıÌfi˜ ÙˆÓ ÂÌÂÈÚÈÎÒÓ ÂÚ¢ÓÒÓ Ô˘ Ú·ÁÌ·ÙÔÔÈÔ‡ÓÙ·È Ì¤Û· ÛÙȘ Û¯ÔÏÈΤ˜ Ù¿ÍÂȘ ‹ ÛÙÔ Û¯ÔÏÂ›Ô ÁÂÓÈÎfiÙÂÚ·. ÀÔΛÌÂÓ· ÙˆÓ ÂÚ¢ÓÒÓ ·˘ÙÒÓ Â›Ó·È ÔÈ ÂÎ·È‰Â˘ÙÈÎÔ› ‹/Î·È ÔÈ Ì·ıËÙ¤˜, ÂÓÒ Ù· 5 √ Î. ∫ÒÛÙ·˜ ª¿ÁÔ˜ Â›Ó·È ∂Î·È‰Â˘ÙÈÎfi˜, ¢È‰¿ÎÙˆÚ ∂ÈÛÙËÌÒÓ Ù˘ ∞ÁˆÁ‹˜ Î·È ÂÚÁ¿˙ÂÙ·È ÛÙÔ ¶ÚfiÁÚ·ÌÌ· ÙÔ˘ À¶∂¶£ «∂η›‰Â˘ÛË ªÔ˘ÛÔ˘ÏÌ·ÓÔ·›‰ˆÓ» Ô˘ ˘ÏÔÔÈÂ›Ù·È ·fi ÙÔ ¶·ÓÂÈÛÙ‹- ÌÈÔ ∞ıËÓÒÓ.

description

Συνέντευξη ή παρατήρηση

Transcript of Συνέντευξη ή παρατήρηση

  • ;:

    , .....

    , (McIntyre, 1996, . 20)

    - . , - . - . / - - : , .

    . / ,

    5

    . , - .

  • , , , .. - . , , - nderson Burns (1989, . 16), . - McIntyre (1996) - -, .

    - . , , -, , - , . , Trochim (2002), - .

    - . , . Denzin Lincoln (2000) . -, , - - (.. , , , ..). -

    E E

    6

  • , , .

    Phillips (1993), - - , - . Trochim (2002) . . - . , - .

    - (Anderson & Burns, 1989 Hopkins, 1995 Flick, 1998 Dragonas etal., 1999) - . - .

    - . M. Mac an Ghaill (1995), , - . , . - - .

    , Bird (Bird & Hammersley, 1999) . , , .

    ;:

    7

  • . , - , . - .

    , Woods (1991, . 62) , - . - , (, 2001). , , , .

    ishler (1996, . 64) - - . - . Woods (1991, . 89) , Verma Mallick (2004) , Walker (1996, . 191) .

    , - . - . ,(Hannan, 1975 ias, 1991 & , 1991 &, 1999) - , - , . .

    E E

    8

  • . , , . . Strauss Corbin (1996, . 56) - , . - (Silverman, 2000, . 827), , , . erelson(1971, . 16), , , - , .

    , . - (Silverman, 2000, . 825).

    , - Strauss Corbin(1996, . 97) , , .

    - , - , , (Patton, 1990 ird et al., 1999).

    -, . , Silverman(2000, . 832) . -

    ;:

    9

  • , Woods (1991, . 85) .

    An-derson Burns (1989) . , - , . , - (Benzer, 1993 ammersley, 1996 Walker & Adelman, 1996) , - .

    Jorgensen (1989) , , . . Patton (1990) , - . , - . (Delamont & Hamilton, 1993, . 34), , .

    - (Woods, 1991 Wilkinson, 1998ird et al., 1999 Altrichter et al., 2001), - - .

    E E

    10

  • . Elliot Adelman ( pkins,1995, . 153) - . Woods (1991, . 150), - , : . Wright (1993, . 26), , .

    - , , (ecker, ird et al., 1999, . 148) - , - - (Gitlin et al, 1991, . 199).

    , Walker Adelman (1996), - , . - , , . , .

    - . Stenhouse (1996, . 229), - -. , - . -

    ;:

    11

  • , , - , . - - - , - (Anderson & Burns, 1989, . 138) , , .

    - , - (pkins, 1995, . 81). , , . - , ,, , - , - - , , ..

    , , - -. - , - -. (Walker & Adelman, 1996, . 5) , , - . , ,

    E E

    12

  • (nderson & Burns, 1989, 138), , , .

    : , (, 2001). , , - . . , .

    - , . - Stubbs (1996, . 76) : - - . - , - , , , - .., . , -, , , , , ..

    Scarth Hammersley (1993, . 186) ,

    ;:

    13

  • , - . - , , .

    , , - , , (cIntyre &Macleod, 1996, . 16) , . T Hopkins (1995, . 107) - - .

    . . , - .

    - , - . - .

    - . , , , -, .

    . Hutt Hutt(1970), , -

    E E

    14

  • . - . -, , , - , : , .

    . (1993) : - , , , -.

    Flanders ORACLE. Flan-ders (Flanders Interaction Analysis System) -. Flanders ( , , , , , , ), - ( , ) .

    - ORACLE (Observation Research and Classroom Lear-ning Evaluation) - - . , Flanders, - : - (Pupil Record) - (Teacher Record).

    ,

    ;:

    15

  • . - . , , - . - , . (ltrichter et al., 2001 , 2002) , , - . , - , , .

    ltrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2001). . . : .

    Anderson, L., & Burns, R. (1989). Research in Classroom. The Study of Teachers,Teaching and Instruction. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Benzer, W. (1993). Seeing Young Children: A guide to observing and recording beha-vior. New York: Delmar Publishers.

    erelson, B. (1971). Content Analysis in Communication Research. New York: Haf-ner Publishing Company.

    Bird, M., Hammersley, M., Gomm, R., & Woods, P. (1999). E - . . : .

    Bird, M., & Hammersley, M. (1999). . . M. Bird, & M. Hammersley, (.), - . . : -.

    Delamont, S., & Hamilton, D. (1993). Revisiting Classroom Research: A Conti-nuing Cautionary Tale. n M. Hammersley (Ed.), Controversies in ClassroomResearch. London: Open University Press.

    Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). he Discipline and Practice of Qualitative

    E E

    16

  • Research. n N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of QualitativeResearch, 2nd Ed. London: Sage.

    Dragonas, Th., Androussou, A., Petroyiannis, K., & Inglessi, Ch. (1999). valua-tion d une formation sur le terrain dans le domaine de l ducation intercul-turelle. Carrefours de l ducation, 8, 56-83.

    Flick, U. (1998). An introduction to qualitative research: theory, method and applica-tions. London: Sage.

    Gitlin, A., Siegel, M., & Boru, K. (1993). The politics of method: from leftist eth-nography to educative research. n M. Hammersley (Ed.), Educational Research:current issues. London: The Open University and Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Hammersley, M. (1996). On Practitioner Ethnography. n M. Hammersley (d),Controversies in Classroom Research. London: Open University Press.

    Hannan, A. (1975). The problem of the Unmotivated in an Open School: A Par-ticipant Observation Study. n G. Chanan, & S. Delamont (Eds), Frontiers ofClassroom Research. London: NFER.

    Hopkins, D. (1995). A teachers guide to classroom research. London: Open Univer-sity Press.

    Hutt, B.J., & Hutt, C. (1970). Direct Observation and Measurement of Behavior.USA: Charles Thomas.

    Jorgensen, D. (1989). Participant Observation. A Methodology for Human Studies.London: Sage.

    , . (2001). : . : .

    Mac an Ghaill, M. (1995). Young, gifted and black: Methodological reflections ofa teacher researcher. n G. Walford (Ed.), Doing Educational Research. Lon-don: Routledge.

    McIntyre, D. (1996). Teaching Styles and Pupil Progress: A Review of BennettsStudy. n M. Hammersley (Ed.), Controversies in Classroom Research. Lon-don: Open University Press.

    McIntyre, D., & Macleod, G. (1996). The Characteristics and Uses of SystematicClassroom Observation. n M. Hammersley (Ed.), Controversies in ClassroomResearch. London: Open University Press.

    Mishler, E. G. (1996). . : ., . (2002). . : .

    ;:

    17

  • Nias, J. (1991). Primary teachers talking: a reflexive account of longitudinal re-search. n M. Hammersley (Ed.), Educational Research. Current Issues. Lon-don: Paul Chapman and Open University.

    Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. London: Sage.Phillips, D. C. (1993). Subjectivity and Objectivity: An Objective Inquiry. n M.

    Hammersley (d), Educational Research: current issues. London: The OpenUniversity and Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Scarth, J., & Hammersley, M. (1993). Questioning ORACLE: An assessment ofORACLE analysis of teachers questions. n R. Gomm, & P. Woods (Eds),Educational Research in Action. London: The Open University and PaulChapman Publishing.

    Silverman, D. (2000). Analyzing Talk and Text. n N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln(Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd Ed. London: Sage.

    Stenhouse, L. (1996). The Teacher as Researcher. n M. Hammersley (Ed.), Cont-roversies in Classroom Research. London: Open University Press.

    Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1996). Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques andProcedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.

    Stubbs, M. (1996). Scratching the Surface: Linguistic Data in Educational Re-search. n M. Hammersley (d.), Controversies in Classroom Research. Lon-don: Open University Press.

    Trochim, W. (2002). The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate. In www. trochim.hu-man. cornell.edu/kb/qual.deb.htm

    , . (1993). . : Gutenberg.

    , ., & , . (1999). -. . : - 1997-2000.

    , ., & , . (1991). .: .

    Verma, G., & Mallick, K. (2004). . - . : -. .

    Walker, R., & Adelman, C. (1996). Interaction Analysis in Informal Classrooms:A critical comment on the Flanders system. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Cont-roversies in Classroom Research. London: Open University Press.

    E E

    18

  • Walker, R. (1996). The Conduct of Educational Case Studies: Ethics, Theory andProcedures. n M. Hammersley (Ed.), Controversies in Classroom Research.London: Open University Press.

    Wilkinson, J. (1998). Direct Observation. n G. M. Breakwell, S. Hammond, & C.File-Schaw (Eds), Research Methods in Psychology. London: Sage.

    Woods, P. (1991). Inside Schools. Ethnography in Education Research. London:Routledge.

    Wright, C. (1993). School processes an ethnographic study. n P. Woods, & M.Hammersley (Eds), Gender and Ethnicity in Schools. London: The Open Uni-versity and Routledge.

    ;:

    19