•™£¤™— ”™‘›•¤™—...

download •™£¤™— ”™‘›•¤™— ¤¥ £ •‌§‘¥•.— ¤•§‌— ¤¥

of 44

  • date post

    29-Jul-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    790
  • download

    21

Embed Size (px)

Transcript of •™£¤™— ”™‘›•¤™—...

.... 12/09

. .

() . ..

2010

iii

, .

. , . , , / . 1

, : ) (proof) (.. ) ) ( )1 , 1

, . , , 2002.

iv

, ) (stratagem), , . . , , 2, , . , . , ( ) .

Rahim, A., 'A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict', Academy of Management Journal', 1983, Vol.26, N.2, .368-376.

2

1

, , ,

.

, , , , . , , (), , , . , . 3 , , , ( ). a priori , , . , a posteriori, Schopenhauer Arthur, . , Printa, 2008. Saunders Bailey, he Art of Controversy and other posthumous papers by Arthur Schopenhauer, Swan Sonnenschein & CO. Lim., , 1896. .3

2

. , -, . , . , . , 4. . . , . . , , . , . , . 4

, - . . , . 2008. . 130 .

3

, , . , , , , . , , , , , , , . , 5. 6, , ( ), . -. (Contra negantem principia non est disputandum)6. - . : ) ad rem ( res), , ) ad hominem ex concessis 5 6

. , , 2002.

Schopenhauer Arthur, . , Printa, 2008

4

. : ) , ) , , . , , , , , .

. . . , . 13 , , 1979 112 7 ( ).

7

David H. Fischer Historian Fallacies New York: Harper & Row, 1979.

5

( ) . , . .8 . . modus ponens modus tollens9 . ( ) 10. (Argumentum ad hominem): , 8

Baggini, Julian & Fosl, Peter S. :

(. ), , 2005..9

, . . ...

200910

Irving Copi Carl Cohen . Introduction to

logic, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall 1998.

6

(ad hominem)11, . . ad hominem . ( ex concessis) , , .

(Argumentum ad Ignorantiam): , . ( ) , . . , , , .

( -ad hominem). (ex concessis) ( , , ) .

11

7

(Argumentum ad verecundiam): , , . . , . (Argumentum ad populum): .

, , . , , . Bertrand Russell , . , , .12 (Argumentum ad baculum): , . (ad baculum )

. 416 .. 12

Bertrand Russell Marriage and Morals New York: Liveright, 1929.

8

: , , . , ( ) ( ) , . (Ignoratio Elenchi): . . , , . (Petitio Principii): . (.. ), , , . , . . David Hume ,

9

. (Accident): . .. . secundum quid ( ), , , . (Converse Accident): . , .

. (Argumentum non causa pro causa):

. , , . post hoc ergo proper hoc , . (Fallacy of Equivocation):

10

. 13, . . . , . , , . , , . ; . . . , , . , 14. (Amphiboly): . , , , , . : . . . 14 Richard Robinson, An atheists Values Oxford University Press, , 1964, . 12113

11

(accent), 15, , , .. . . (Composition): , .. . . , , , (Division): T , , , .. , , .

15

Copi I. M. & Cohen C, Introduction to logic, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall 1998.

12

( ) ( ). . ) ( 4) , , . ) ( 7) ( - ), , . , . ) ( 8) , ( ). .

13

) ( 10) , , . ) ( 12) . , , , . : , , . ) ( 13-14-15) , , - - . ( ) . , ( ) . ,

14

. . ) ( 18-23)

, , , (mutatio controversiae). , . , .

. ) ( 19) , , , . , , . , , (status controversiae) ) ( 22) , . , , .

15

)

( 25)

, , . (exemplum in contrarium, instantia). : ) ) ) . ) ( 28) . argumentum ad auditores , : . ) ( 32) , . , , , ... ) ( 35) . . , - , -

16

. (argumentum ab utili). ) ( 36) , . . 16. ) ( 38) . . argumentum ad personam argumentum ad hominem : ad hominem , ad personam , . , . : , .

O Victor Goldsmith Vicar of Wakefild.

16

17

: , , . , . (Slippery Slope): , . , . . . . , , , , . , . .. , . , . , , . .

18

( ). , . , . . , , . , , . 17, . , . ( ) . , , . , .

17

P=>Q

19

, . . (soundness) : (sound) , , (, , ). (valid) , , : (1) , . (2) . (3) . , (invalid) 18.

18

, . . ... 2009

20

, . . .

. ,

(expanding pie)19. , , , , 19. Francois de Callieres, 18 , , 20.

19

( ) . Franois de Callires, The Practice of Diplomacy, translation of "De la manire de ngocier avec les souverains," London: Constable & Co, 1919. . 43

20

21

. , , , 21. , . , - , - . . , , /. . . , . , . , , , , . , . 21

Umberto Eco, Daniele Del Giudice, Gianfranco Ravasi, , , 2006.