What is Capiphon? Revolutionary Drainage Technology Best Invention of the Year 1999 International...

Post on 01-Apr-2015

213 views 0 download

Transcript of What is Capiphon? Revolutionary Drainage Technology Best Invention of the Year 1999 International...

What is Capiphon?What is Capiphon?

Revolutionary Drainage Technology

Best Inventionof the Year 1999

International Exhibition on Ideas, Inventions

and Novelties Nuremberg

What is Capiphon?What is Capiphon?

• 20 cm wide belt of soft durable plastic • 2 mm thick• Ω (Greek Omega) shaped grooves on

under-side• 0.3 mm opening, 1 mm internal pore

What is Capiphon?What is Capiphon?

What is Capiphon?What is Capiphon?

What’s in a Name? What’s in a Name?

• Capiphon = capillary + siphon– Capillarity– Siphon – Surface Tension– Gravity

Continuous column of water in soil

How does it work? How does it work?

How does it work? How does it work?

Year 1 TrialYear 1 Trial

• Capiphon can be used to irrigate vineyards. • Only low head required < 30cm• Level of rise can be controlled by raising/lowering head• Wetting band 1-2 metres either side• Flow rate less than standard drippers.• Flow rate varies according to existing soil moisture.

Further Work IndicatedFurther Work Indicated

– Differing soil types/structures– Wetting patterns in detail– Optimal depth for differing species– Plant responses– Optimal scheduling– Low pressure water supply– Mechanical installation

This StudyCapiphon Belt vs Drip vs Nil

– Mark III system• Simpler to fabricate• Simpler to install• Robust

– Compare soil moisture responses at• Surface• 125 mm depth• 250 mm depth• 350 mm depth

– Fruit yield

2 replications * 3 rowsDrip irrigation disabled on rows either side of plot

Measuring Water Volumes

Water applied to trial site

20-S

ep-1

2

28-S

ep-1

2

06-O

ct-1

2

14-O

ct-1

2

22-O

ct-1

2

30-O

ct-1

2

07-N

ov-1

2

15-N

ov-1

2

23-N

ov-1

2

01-D

ec-1

2

09-D

ec-1

2

17-D

ec-1

2

25-D

ec-1

2

02-J

an-1

3

10-J

an-1

3

18-J

an-1

3

26-J

an-1

3

03-F

eb-1

3

11-F

eb-1

3

19-F

eb-1

3

27-F

eb-1

30

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Irrigation Events

Drip Capiphon

Vo

lum

e (L

itre

s)

Water applied to trial site

29-Aug-12 18-Oct-12 07-Dec-12 26-Jan-13 17-Mar-130

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000Accumulated Volume

Accumuiated Drip

Accumulated Capiphon

To

tal

Vo

lum

e (L

itre

s)

Measuring Soil MoistureProbes mid-way between vine and Irrigation Trench

Soil Factors

• Duplex• Variable – obviously shaped pre-planting• Clay depth varied 125mm to 300mm

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

5

10

15

20

25 Surface

drip 0 nil 0

Capiphon 0

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

5

10

15

20

25

125mm depth

drip 125 nil 125

Capiphon 125

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

5

10

15

20

25250mm depth

drip 250 Nil 250

Capiphon 250

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

5

10

15

20

25

30

350mm depth

Drip 350

Nill 350

Capiphon 350

Average Soil Moisture at Depth

0 125 250 350

Drip 5.6 8.6 11.2 12.6

Nil 4.3 5.9 9.4 13.6

Capiphon 3.6 9.5 13.4 14.3

Average Soil Moisture at Depth

Drip Nil Capiphon

0 5.6 4.3 3.6

125 8.6 5.9 9.5

250 11.2 9.4 13.4

350 12.6 13.6 14.3

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

Soil Moisture at Depth

Drip

Nil

Capiphon

mm depth

So

il M

ois

ture

Moisture levels at root zone 1(00-300mm) higher under Capiphon irrigation than under Drip

Fruit Weight (Kg)

Sum No. Mean SD

Drip 266.2 57.0 4.67 2.12

Nil 57.6 23.0 2.50 1.46

Capiphon 112.8 27.0 4.18 1.49

Equivalent fruit yield

The Treatment effect is highly statistically significant, showing no evidence of a difference in Fruit weight between the Capiphon and Drip treatments, but a sizable reduction of 1.73 units (95% Confidence interval 0.80 - 2.66) between the nil and Capiphon treatments.

Drip

Nil

Capiphon

Drip

DripNil

Capiphon

Conclusions

Capiphon Irrigation • Delivered water to plant root zone in a vineyard• Used less water• No significant difference in fruit yield compared to Drip

Further Work

• Larger, more refined trials• Trials with less water• Other crops• Differing soil profiles• Differing slopes• Root spread • Infrastructure• Optimal operational procedures• Lots, lots more …

Acknowledgements

• Management and staff at Yalumba’s Jansz Parish Vineyard (formerly Frogmore Creek) for their assistance and advice, especially for allowing me to get in their way.

• Emeritus Prof Don McNeil for the statistical analysis of fruit yield.