The influence of the type of oil phase on the self-assembly process of...
Transcript of The influence of the type of oil phase on the self-assembly process of...
Research Article
The influence of the type of oil phase on the self-assemblyprocess of g-oryzanol þ b-sitosterol tubules in organogelsystems
Hassan Sawalha1,2, Giel Margry1, Ruud den Adel3, Paul Venema1, Arjen Bot3, Eckhard Floter3,4 and
Erik van der Linden1
1 Laboratory of Physics and Physical Chemistry of Foods, Department of Agrotechnology and Food
Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands2 Chemical Engineering Department, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine3 Unilever Research and Development Vlaardingen, Vlaardingen, The Netherlands4 Food Process Engineering, Department of Food Technology and Food Chemistry, Technical University
Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Mixtures of g-oryzanol and b-sitosterol were used to structure different oils (decane, limonene,
sunflower oil, castor oil, and eugenol). The g-oryzanol and b-sitosterol mixtures self-assemble into
double-walled hollow tubules (�10 nm in diameter) in the oil phase, which aggregate to form a
network resulting in firm organogels. The self-assembly of the sterol molecules into tubules was
studied using light scattering and rheology. By using different oils, the influence of the polarity of the
oil on the self-assembly was studied. The effects of temperature and structurant concentration on the
tubuler formation process were determined and the thermodynamic theory of self-assembly was
applied to calculate the change in Gibbs free energy (DG0), enthalpy (DH0), and entropy (DS0)
resulting from the aggregation of the structurants was determined. The self-assembly was found to be
enthalpy-driven as characterized by a negative DH0 and DS0. A decreasing polarity of the oil promotes
the self-assembly leading to formation of tubules at higher temperatures and lower structurant
concentrations.
Keywords: Critical aggregation concentration / Enthalpy / Entropy / Light scattering / Organogels
Received: November 20, 2011 / Revised: October 15, 2012 / Accepted: October 30, 2012
DOI: 10.1002/ejlt.201100395
1 Introduction
Structuring of edible oils with crystalline triacylglycerols, i.e.
fats, for production of foods (e.g. margarine and table
spreads) can contribute to the risk for cardiovascular diseases
due to the high saturated fatty acids content in these fats [1–
3]. In the last decade, much effort has been invested to
identify alternative structurants [4–6]. Mixtures of plant
sterols (g-oryzanol and b-sitosterol) were proposed as a pro-
mising candidate to replace these crystalline triacylglycerols
[7, 8]. Both compounds can be obtained from edible sources:
b-sitosterol is a minor component in several vegetable oils
and g-oryzanol can be found in rice bran oil [7]. In addition,
(esterified) plant sterols are used as cholesterol lowering
agents as they interfere with absorption of cholesterol in
the intestine [9].
Several publications reported on the use of mixtures of
g-oryzanol and b-sitosterol for structuring of organogels and
emulsions [7, 8, 10–15]. The g-oryzanol and b-sitosterol in
sunflower oil were found to self-assemble into hollow tubules
with an average diameter of �10 nm which aggregate to
form a network resulting in a transparent and firm organogel
[7, 8, 16]. In a water-in-oil emulsion, the formation of the
tubular microstructure was disturbed because the water mol-
ecules bind to the sitosterol to form sitosterol monohydrates,
which hinder the self-assembly of the sterol molecules
into tubules [10, 12, 13]. Recently, the thermodynamic
Correspondence: Hassan Sawalha, Chemical Engineering Department,
An-Najah National University, P.O. Box 7, Nablus, Palestine
E-mail: [email protected]
Fax: þ970 9 2345 982
Abbreviation: CAC, critical aggregation concentration
Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2013, 115, 295–300 295
� 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.ejlst.com
parameters of the self-assembly of sterols into tubules in
sunflower oil were determined: binding energy, enthalpy,
and entropy change. The self-assembly into tubules was
found to be enthalpy-driven [14].
The objective of the present study was to extend this work
and to investigate the effect of the polarity of the oil phase on
the thermodynamics of sterol self-assembly. To do so, orga-
nogels were prepared in several oils with different polarities.
Light scattering and rheology were used to study the start of
the self-assembly process as a function of sterol concentration
and temperature. From these measurements, the changes in
Gibbs free energy, enthalpy, and entropy associated with the
self-assembly were determined.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Materials
In the current study, g-oryzanol powder was obtained from
Tsuno Rice Fine Chemicals, Wakayama, Japan and tall oil
sterol granules (78.5% b-sitosterol, 10.3% b-sitostanol, 8.7%
campesterol, and 2.5% of other minor sterols) was provided
by Unilever, the Netherlands. The following oils were used
for the preparation of the organogels: decane (purity >99%,
Sigma–Aldrich, The Netherlands), limonene (purity >97%,
Sigma–Aldrich), sunflower oil (Reddy, NV Vandemoortele,
Breda, the Netherlands), castor oil (Sigma), and eugenol
(purity>99%, Aldrich, see Table 1 for the dielectric constant
and chemical structures of the oils). All materials were used as
received.
2.2 Methods
2.2.1 Preparation of the organogels
Mixtures of oryzanol and sitosterol at a fixed ratio of (60
oryzanol:40 sitosterol w/w) were dissolved in the oil phase at
�1008C using a magnetic stirrer. The structurant solution
was cooled down according to the cooling profile specified
below to follow the aggregation using the light scattering or
rheology.
2.2.2 Light scattering
The light scattering, Malvern (Nano) Zetasizer 3 (Malvern
Instruments, UK), was used to study the aggregation process
of oryzanol and sitosterol into tubules in different oils. Hot
structurant solution was poured in the preheated (808C)
cuvette. Measurements were performed by cooling the
solution in the cuvette from 80 to 08C stepwise with a cooling
rate of 28C/step. Before each measurement, the solution was
kept at a fixed temperature for �8 min after each cooling
step to equilibrate.
2.2.3 Rheology
Anton PaarModular Compact Rheometer (MCR300) with a
coaxial cylinder measuring geometry (Cuvette cell, CC 17)
was used to perform the rheological measurements. The
Cuvette cell was preheated to 808C before a hot structurants
solution was poured into the cell and kept at 808C for 20 min
to equilibrate. The tubuler formation process was followed by
cooling the solution from 80 to 08C using a cooling rate of
0.28C/min. The measurements were performed in the linear
regime with a strain of 0.001 and frequency of 1 Hz.
2.2.4 Scanning electron microscope (SEM)
Field emission scanning electron microscope (Magellan 400,
FEI, Eindhoven, the Netherlands) was used to visualize the
tubular morphology of the organogels. The method reported
by Sawalha et al. [13] was followed in preparing the samples
for SEM tests.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Aggregation as measured by light scattering andrheology
The aggregation of oryzanol and sitosterol in different oils
was studied using light scattering and rheology. Figure 1
shows an example of the scattered light intensity as a function
of temperature during cooling of solutions with different
Table 1. Dielectric constant and chemical structure of various oils
Oil Chemical structure Dielectric constant [13]
Decane CH3(CH2)8CH3 2.0
Limonene 2.4
Sunflower oil
3.1
Castor oil 4.5
Eugenol 4-(H2C¼CHCH2)C6H3-2-(OCH3)OH 10.4
296 H. Sawalha et al. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2013, 115, 295–300
� 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.ejlst.com
concentrations of structurants in castor oil. The figure shows
that upon cooling of the solutions, the scattered light intensity
remains constant and sharply increases at a specific tempera-
ture. The temperature at which the intensity suddenly
increased is dependent on the structurant concentration. A
sharp increase in the scattered light intensity is indicative to
the formation of aggregates. The so-called critical aggrega-
tion concentration (CAC) of structurants is the concentration
below which aggregates do not exist, while above the CAC
aggregates do exist. In our case, the aggregates are linear
assemblies that assume a tubular shape [14]. One can
measure the CAC as a function of temperature. For each
structurant concentration, there exists a temperature at
which a sudden increase in light scattering occurs. The
specific structurant concentration equals the CAC at that
temperature.
The resulting CAC’s as obtained from light scattering
data are summarized in Table 2. The table shows that the
dependency of the CAC on temperature also is a function of
the type of oil used. Decane shows high aggregation tem-
peratures as compared to the other oils, whereas terpenes
(i.e. limonene and eugenol) show relatively low aggregation
temperatures (for the same concentrations).
Rheological measurements were also performed to study
the aggregation process. The storage moduli (G0) of the
structurant solutions in various oils were measured during
cooling and the results (for castor oil as an example) are
shown in Fig. 2. During cooling, at a given concentration
structurant, a sharp increase in the G0 was observed at a
certain temperature. This sudden increase is a consequence
of the formation of a network of aggregates. Since only a very
low amount of linear aggregates already leads to network
formation, this point practically marks the aggregate for-
mation. Taking the reasoning above for sudden increase in
the intensity of scattered light, the sudden increase of G0
also indicates the CAC. The CAC data of the various oils
obtained from the G0 data are given in Table 2. The Table
shows a good agreement between the CAC data as obtained
from light scattering and rheology.
3.2 Appearance of the organogels
From visual observation of the organogels, we noticed that
the gels prepared with high polarity oils, i.e. sunflower oils
and eugenol were generally transparent, whereas gels pre-
pared with decane and limonene turn opaque after short time
of preparation. Furthermore, the transparency of the gels
generally decreases with increasing the concentration of
the gelators. These differences might be ascribed to the
differences in the chemical structure of the oils, which affects
the solubility and mutual interaction of the sterols.
Figure 1. The scattered light intensity of 16, 18, 20, 22, and
24% w/w (60 oryzanol: 40 sitosterol) solutions in castor oil as a
function of temperature during cooling.
Table 2. Aggregation temperature at different structurants
concentration during cooling of structurants solutions in different oils
measured by light scattering and rheology
Oil
Structurants
concentration
% w/w
Taggregation (K)
light scatteringa)Taggregation (K)
rheologya)
Decane 8 327 326
10 331 329
12 334 330
14 340 333
16 339 335
Limonene 14 279 275
16 279 276
18 284 276
20 285 283
22 284 285
Sunflower 8 289 287
10 299 298
12 307 306
14 314b) 314
16 318b) 321
Castor oil 16 287 285
18 295 296
20 301 303
22 307 310
24 313 313
Eugenol 28 278 276
30 281 282
32 287 288
34 295 291
a) Some of the samples were measured in duplicate and in this case
the average temperature was taken.b) The data points were taken from the work of Sawalha et al. [14].
Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2013, 115, 295–300 Self-assembly process of g-oryzanolþb-sitosterol tubules 297
� 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.ejlst.com
3.3 Morphology of organogels
The morphology of the tubular microstructure in organogel
was visualized with SEM. Figure 3 shows SEM images of
organogel sample prepared with 32%w/w sitosterol–oryzanol
mixture in sunflower oil. Bundles of tubules with an average
size of �60 nm/bundle could be clearly seen in Fig. 3a. The
bundles were visualized at a higher magnification as shown in
Fig. 3b. Individual linear tubules with an average diameter of
7–15 nm (including the tungsten coating of 3 nm) and aver-
age length ranging from 5 to 10 mmwere observed. The SEM
results confirm that mixtures of sitosterol and oryzanol
indeed self-assemble to form tubules in the oil phase, which
is in agreement with small-angle X-ray scattering and small-
angle neutron scattering results published recently [13, 16].
The small-angle X-ray scattering and small-angle neutron
scattering interference patterns for organogels prepared with
the same type of oils used in the present study were similar
which indicates similar tubular structures in all oils.
3.4 Thermodynamics of tubule formation
In the present section, the data of the CAC and aggregation
temperature, presented in Table 2, will be used to determine
the change in Gibbs free energy DG0, enthalpy DH0, and
entropy DS0 that is associated with tubule formation.
The sterol monomers are assumed to self-assemble into
one-dimensional tubular aggregates like the steps in a spiral
staircase [14]. The change in Gibbs free energy was
therefore calculated using the following equation from the
one-dimensional self-assembly theory [17, 18]:
xN ¼ N x1exp�DG0
RT
� �� �N
(1)
here xN is the molar fraction tubular aggregates containing N
sterols as building blocks, x1 is the sterol monomeric molar
fraction of the building blocks that are not incorporated into
the tubules. [16, 17]. Since xN cannot become larger than one
(it follows that x1 cannot become larger than exp(DG0/RT).
This identifies the molar fraction of monomeric building
blocks (sterols) at the CAC as x1, CAC � exp(DG0/RT). All
additional building blocks (sterols) added in excess of the
CAC will be incorporated into tubules.
Figure 2. Storage modules (G0) of 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24% w/w
(60 oryzanol: 40 sitosterol) solutions in castor oil as a function of
temperature during cooling.
Figure 3. SEM micrograph of an organogel prepared with 32% (60:40 mixture of oryzanol/sitosterol) in sunflower oil.
298 H. Sawalha et al. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2013, 115, 295–300
� 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.ejlst.com
To calculate the changes in Gibbs free energy DG0,
enthalpy DH0 upon aggregation involved in the tubular for-
mation process, the following equations were used:
DG0 ¼ RTlnx1;CAC(2)
DH0 ¼ �RT2 @ lnx1;CAC
@T
� �(3)
For the calculation of the entropy change DS0, the following
equation was used:
DG0 ¼ DH0 � TDS0 (4)
where DS0 is the change in molar entropy upon aggregation.
The values of lnx1,CAC were plotted against the corre-
sponding aggregation temperature for the various oils as
shown in Fig. 4. The structurant molar fraction was calcu-
lated based on the average molecular weight of (60:40 ory-
zaol:sitosterol) and the temperature is taken as the average of
the Taggregation measured by light scattering and rheology
shown in Table 2. The data was fitted using Eq. (3) and
the change in enthalpy and entropy was determined (see
Table 3). Figure 4 represents the (mole fraction sterols vs.
temperature) phase diagram of the tubule formation in differ-
ent oils. Here, the phase transition lines of the aggregation
process are plotted. The enthalpy and entropy changes of
the aggregation process in all oils were negative (i.e. DH0<0
and DS0<0, see Table 3) in line with the expectation that
the tubule formation is an enthalpy driven process. The
results also show that the changes in enthalpy DH0 and
entropy DS0 decrease with decreasing oil polarity (see
Fig. 5). For example, with decane (the lowest polarity among
the oils used, see Table 1 for dielectric constant) the DH0 and
DS0 were at least five times lower compared to eugenol (the
most polar oil used). This is in line with the change in Gibbs
free energy DG0 which also decreases with decreasing the
polarity of the oil indicating that the tubules (and resulting
gels) are more thermodynamically stable in oils with lower
polarity.
4 Conclusions
The effect of oil phase polarity on tubule formation by
g-oryzanol/b-sitosterol mixtures was investigated. The
g-oryzanol and b-sitosterol monomers exhibited self-assem-
bly and a CAC depending on the type of oil. The self-assem-
bly was found to be enthalpy driven where both DH0 and DS0
are negative. The values of DG0, DH0, and DS0 related to the
self-assembly were dependent on the polarity of the oils; the
lower the polarity, the lowerDG0,DH0, andDS0. The stability
against temperature changes of the tubules (and resulting
gels) increases with decreasing the polarity of the oil.
The main conclusion of this study is that polarity and
chemical structure of the oil phase play an important role in
the aggregate formation by sterols molecules in organogel
systems.
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
[1] Pernetti, M., van Malssen, K. F., Floter, E., Bot, A.,Structuring of edible oils by alternatives to crystalline fat.Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 12, 221–231.
-4
-3
-2
-1
00.001 0.002 0.003 0.004
ln(x
) (-)
1/T (1/K)
Decane
Limonene
Sunflower
Castor oil
Eugenol
Figure 4. Phase diagram (ln(x1,CAC) vs. temperature) of sterols in
different oils.
Table 3. The change in enthalpy and entropy upon binding for the
structurants in different oils
Oil DH0 (kJ/mol) DS0 � 103 (kJ/K/mol)
Decane �63.2 �162.6
Limonene �36.9 �107.0
Sunflower oil �15.4 �36.4
Castor oil �9.5 �22.0
Eugenol �10.3 �19.0
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
-80
-60
-40
-20
00 4 8 12
ΔS0 *10
3 [kJ
mol
-1 K
-1].
ΔH0
[kJ
mol
-1]
dielectric constant [-]
ΔH ΔS
Figure 5. DH and DS of aggregation as a function of the dielectric
constant (polarity) of the oils used in preparation of the gels.
Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2013, 115, 295–300 Self-assembly process of g-oryzanolþb-sitosterol tubules 299
� 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.ejlst.com
[2] Marangoni, A. G., Garti, N., Edible Oleogels: Structure andHealth Implications, AOCS Press, Urbana, IL USA 2011.
[3] Dassanayake, L. S. K., Kodali, D. R., Ueno, S., Formation ofoleogels based on edible lipid materials, Curr. Opin. ColloidInterface Sci. 2011, 16, 432–439.
[4] Daniel, J., Rajasekharan, R., Organogelation of plant oils andhydrocarbons by long-chain saturated FA, fatty alcohols, waxesters, and dicarboxylic acids. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2003,80, 417–421.
[5] Laredo, T., Barbut, S., Marangoni, A. G., Molecular inter-actions of polymer oleogelation.SoftMatter2011, 7, 2734–2743.
[6] Rogers, M. A., Wright, A. J., Marangoni, A. G., Oil organo-gels: The fat of the future? Soft Matter 2009, 5, 1594–1596.
[7] Bot, A., Agterof, W. G. M., Structuring of edible oilsby mixtures of g-oryzanol with b-sitosterol or related phyto-sterols. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2006, 83, 513–521.
[8] Bot, A., den Adel, R., Roijers, E., Fibrils of g-Oryzanol þ b-Sitosterol in Edible Oil Organogels. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.2008, 85, 1127–1134.
[9] Katan, M. B., Grundy, S. M., Jones, P., Law, M. et al.,Efficacy and safety of plant stanols and sterols in the manage-ment of blood cholesterol levels. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2003, 78,965–978.
[10] Bot, A., den Adel, R., Regkos, C., Sawalha, H. et al.,Structuring in b-sitosterol þ g-oryzanol-based emulsion gelsduring various stages of a temperature cycle. Food Hydrocolloids2011, 25, 639–646.
[11] Bot, A., den Adel, R., Roijers, E., Regkos, C., Effect of steroltype on structure of tubules in sterol þ g-oryzanol-basedorganogels. Food Biophys. 2009, 4, 266–272.
[12] Bot, A., Veldhuizen, Y. S. J., den Adel, R., Roijers, E. C.,Non-TAG structuring of edible oils and emulsions. FoodHydrocolloids 2009, 23, 1184–1189.
[13] Sawalha, H., den Adel, R., Venema, P., Bot, A. et al.,Organogel-emulsions with mixtures of b-sitosterol þ g-oryzanol: Effects of water activity and type of continuousoil phase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 3462–3470.
[14] Sawalha, H., Venema, P., Bot, A., Floter, E., van der Linden,E., The influence of concentration and temperature on theformation of g-oryzanol þ b-sitosterol tubules in edible oilorganogels. Food Biophys. 2011, 6, 20–25.
[15] Floter, E., Structuring oils without highly saturated fats –How far are we? Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2012, 114, 983–984.
[16] Bot, A., Gilbert, E., Bouwman, W., Sawalha, H. et al.,Elucidation of density profile of self-assembled sitosterol þoryzanol tubules with small-angle neutron scattering,Faraday Discuss. 2012, 158, 223–238.
[17] Israelachvili, J., Intermolecular & Surface Forces, 3rd Ed.Academic, San Diego, CA, USA 1992.
[18] Kroes-Nijboer, A., Venema, P., Bouman, J., van derLinden, E., The critical aggregation concentration of b-lactoglobulin-based fibril formation. Food Biophys. 2009, 4,59–63.
300 H. Sawalha et al. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2013, 115, 295–300
� 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.ejlst.com