The Aesthetics of Evil

14
The Aesthetics of Evil • Aesthetics: Etymology: mod. < Greek αἰσθητικ-ός, things perceptible by the senses, things material (as opposed to things thinkable or immaterial), also ‘perceptive, sharp in the senses’; < vb. Stem --‘feel, apprehend by the senses’. Applied in German by Baumgarten (1750–58, Æsthetica) to ‘criticism of taste’ considered as a science or philosophy; against which, as a misuse of the word found in German only, protest was made by Kant (1781, Crit. R.V.21), who applied the name, in accordance with the ancient distinction of αἰσθητά and νοητά, to ‘the science which treats of the conditions of sensuous perception,’ a sense retained in the Kantian philosophy, and found in English c1800. But Baumgarten's use of æsthetik found popular acceptance, and appeared in English after 1830, though its adoption was long opposed. (See below.) Recent extravagances in the adoption of a sentimental archaism as the ideal of beauty have still further removed æsthetic and its derivatives from their etymological and purely philosophical meaning.

description

The Aesthetics of Evil. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Aesthetics of Evil

Page 1: The Aesthetics of Evil

The Aesthetics of Evil• Aesthetics: Etymology: mod. < Greek αἰσθητικ-ός, things perceptible by

the senses, things material (as opposed to things thinkable or immaterial), also ‘perceptive, sharp in the senses’; < vb. Stem --‘feel, apprehend by the senses’. Applied in German by Baumgarten (1750–58, Æsthetica) to ‘criticism of taste’ considered as a science or philosophy; against which, as a misuse of the word found in German only, protest was made by Kant (1781, Crit. R.V.21), who applied the name, in accordance with the ancient distinction of αἰσθητά and νοητά, to ‘the science which treats of the conditions of sensuous perception,’ a sense retained in the Kantian philosophy, and found in English c1800. But Baumgarten's use of æsthetik found popular acceptance, and appeared in English after 1830, though its adoption was long opposed. (See below.) Recent extravagances in the adoption of a sentimental archaism as the ideal of beauty have still further removed æsthetic and its derivatives from their etymological and purely philosophical meaning.

Page 2: The Aesthetics of Evil

“Aesthetic”

• Immanuel Kant applies the term to art and nature• Broadened most recently: not only judgments or

evaluations, but properties, attitude and experience, pleasure or value.

• Terms can point out aesthetic and nonaesthetics properties: “powerful” (locomotive vs. Beethoven’s Third or Mahler’s Fifth) ;“pompous” (an English professor or a film by Ken Russell); “daring” (solider or an avant-garde play); “linear” (an equation or an abstract painting); “restful” (a nap or an adagio movement of a chamber piece)

Page 3: The Aesthetics of Evil

John Milton’s Paradise Lost

• John Milton (1608-1674)• Paradise Lost first published in 1667 in ten

books, second edition published in 1674 expanded to twelve books

• 1641-1642 Milton publishes five tracts urging that the Church of England reform itself by reducing its monopolistic, tyrannical power over the religious lives of the people

Page 4: The Aesthetics of Evil

Milton’s Biography

• 1642 Civil War begins in England• 1649-1653 Commonwealth• 1649 Charles I executed• 1660 Charles II enters London as king

(Restoration)

Page 5: The Aesthetics of Evil

Paradise Lost and “Evil”

William Blake: “The reason Milton wrote in fetters when he wrote of Angels & God, and at liberty when of Devils & Hell, is because he was a true poet and of the Devl’s party without knowing it.” –from The Marriage of Heaven and Hell (1793)

Samuel Taylor Coleridge: “In Paradise Lost the sublimest parts are the revelations of Milton’s own mind, producing itself, and evolving its own greatness; and this is so truly so , that when that which is merely entertaining for its objective beauty is introduced, it at first seems a discord.” –from “Lecture X” (1818)

Page 6: The Aesthetics of Evil

Evil and Its Causes

• Etiology: A branch of knowledge that is concerned with causes

• The etiology of Evil in Paradise Lost:Milton’s poetic task is to “justify the ways of God

to Men” (26) and pose the question “whence cometh evil.”

Superhuman agency: “Th’ infernal Serpent: it is was…deceiv’d / the Mother of Mandkind” (34-36).

Page 7: The Aesthetics of Evil

Types of Evil

• PL traces the origin of human iniquity through three distinct manifestations of sin:

(1) Satanic evil-in heaven among Lucifer/Satan (2) Adamic evil-Eden among Adam and Eve(3) Historical evil-foreseen among the

descendents of Adam and Eve

Page 8: The Aesthetics of Evil

Schemes of Causation

• Each manifestation of Evil forms an integral part of Milton’s epic inquiry into the causes of “all our woe” (yet…each inception appears to envision quite dissimilar etiologies of Evil).

• The poem moves from schemes of causation that are:

(1) Internal, moral, and individual(2) External, physical, and communal

Page 9: The Aesthetics of Evil

Satan and Evil

• Radical self-determination (erupts in a vacuum)

• Sin is born the instant Lucifer (“light bearer”—who was created “Good” but free) imagines a new identity, Satan (Adversary)

• Sin a product of the radical freedom of the will

Page 10: The Aesthetics of Evil

Adam and Eve and Evil

• Evil manifests not in a vacuum, but due to “seduction” (an Satan seduces Eve, she in turn seduces Adam).

• Evil depicted as an “external” threat, but the duo succumb in moments of “inward” collapse (by consenting to temptation, both choose evil as they are chosen by it)

Page 11: The Aesthetics of Evil

The Descendants

• Evil as biologically determined (occurs prior to choice)

• External forces on a grander scale than simply the individual (history, race, and…fate?)

*Thus, in Milton’s etiology, the earlier that evil occurs in real time (not narrative sequence), the more spontaneous it seems—as if due to the act of free choice alone. By contrast, the later evil arises, the more substantial it seems—as if due to unavoidable physical contamination.

Page 12: The Aesthetics of Evil

The Aesthetics of Milton’s Satan and Hell/Pandemonium

• Satan as miles gloriosus (Latin for the glorious solider)

Page 13: The Aesthetics of Evil

The Aesthetics of Milton’s Satan and Hell/Pandemonium

Page 14: The Aesthetics of Evil