# Supporting the Obscuring Torus by Radiation Pressure Julian Krolik Johns Hopkins University.

date post

17-Dec-2015Category

## Documents

view

212download

0

Embed Size (px)

### Transcript of Supporting the Obscuring Torus by Radiation Pressure Julian Krolik Johns Hopkins University.

- Slide 1
- Supporting the Obscuring Torus by Radiation Pressure Julian Krolik Johns Hopkins University
- Slide 2
- Typical AGN Have Toroidal Obscuration Spectropolarimetry of type 2 objects Ionization cones warm IR spectra X-ray absorption
- Slide 3
- The Basic Problem N(type 2) ~ N(type 1) implies obscured ~ unobscured which in turn implies h obscured ~ r But h/r ~ v/v orb, with v orb ~ 100 km/s If v = c s, then T ~ 10 5 K >> T subl (dust) If 10 5 K is too hot, what supports the obscuring matter?
- Slide 4
- Candidate Mechanisms Bouncing magnetized clouds stirred by orbital shear (K. & Begelman 1988, Beckert & Duschl 2004) Clumping avoids immediate thermal destruction But is this degree of elasticity plausible? And their collision rate must not be >> the orbital frequency Warped thin disk (Sanders et al. 1989) But well-formed ionization cones are seen close to the center, IR interferometry shows a thick structure at ~1 pc in NGC 1068, and dust cannot survive closer Magnetic wind (Knigl & Kartje 1994) But origin of large-scale field? And mass-loss rate can be very large: 10 N H24 (h/r)(v r100 )r pc Msun/yr
- Slide 5
- Another Candidate Mechanism: Radiation Pressure (Pier & K. 1992) If thermal continuum is created by dust reprocessing, there must be a large radiation flux through the obscuration midIR (dust) ~ 1030 T (Semenov et al. 2003) so (L/L E ) eff ~ (1030)L/L E
- Slide 6
- What is the Internal Flux? All previous calculations of flux have guessed the density distribution: Pier & K. (1993): constant density, rectangular envelope Granato & Danese (1994): density a power-law in r, exponential in cos( ) Efstathiou & Rowan-Robinson (1996): density a power- law in r, exponential in Nenkova, Ivezic & Elitzur (2002): probability of a clump a power-law in r, independent of , approximate treatment of diffuse radiation Hoenig et al. (2006): probability of a clump a power-law in r, Gaussian in z, transfer like Nenkova et al.
- Slide 7
- Radiation Transfer and Dynamics Must Be Consistent F rad moves dusty gas, altering radiation transfer. New transfer solution changes F rad Additional forces (magnetic, collisions,...) further complicate the problem A difficult calculation!
- Slide 8
- Qualitative Character of Solution Greater optical depth in equatorial direction than in (half-) vertical direction guarantees most flux upward; some radial component remains, decreasing outward from the inner edge
- Slide 9
- Possible Dynamical Elements Gravity Radiation pressure Rotational support (j(r) not necessarily = j Kep (r)) Random motions/thermal pressure At inner surface, a drastic phase change flux primarily UV, not IR, so much larger opacity temperature much higher than in torus body rocket effect from evaporating matter Treat this separately!
- Slide 10
- The Simplest Self-Consistent Picture Forces: Gravity Rotational support Radiation pressure Assume hydrostatic balance
- Slide 11
- The Simplest Self-Consistent Picture Assumptions: 2-d, axisymmetric, time-steady thermally-averaged opacity independent of T, diffusion approximation (smooth density distribution) no sources of infrared inside the torus l/l Kep = j(r)
- Slide 12
- Boundary Conditions Must specify available matter: choose (r,z=0) = in (r/r in ) - After finding (r,z), locate photosphere: insist on F ~ cE by varying Must also have E > 0 also by varying Location of inner boundary left undetermined
- Slide 13
- Solution: Entirely Analytic Step 1: Hydrostatic balance + diffusion equilibrium + absence of internal radiation sources leads to r dj 2 /dr + 2(1- ) j 2 = 3 - 2 for = - d ln /d ln r, so that j 2 (r) = [j in 2 + f()](r/r in ) 2(-1) f() In other words, If Frad,z ~ Fgrav,z in a geometrically thick disk, then Frad,r ~ Fgrav,r likewise So the orbiting matter must have sub-Keplerian rotation if it is to remain in equilibrium; magnetic angular momentum redistribution?
- Slide 14
- A)To fix the quantity of available matter--- (r,z=0) = ( * / r in )(r/r in ) - B) To match the diffusion solution to its outgoing flux--- F ~ cE at the dust photosphere (which determines ) Step 2: Requiring both components of force balance to give a consistent density leads to (E/z)/(z 2 ) (E/r)/{r 2 [1-j 2 (r)]} = 0 which is analytically solvable by characteristics: E = constant on (almost) elliptical surfaces Step 3: Apply boundary conditions:
- Slide 15
- Free Parameters Q ' M ( < r i n ) M BH T L E L 1 10 = dl n = dl nr = i n r i n 10 30 As Q increases, increases
- Slide 16
- Example Solution for = 3/2; * = 10; Q=3, so L/L E = 0.10.3 radiation energy densitygas density
- Slide 17
- The X-ray Column Density Distribution Predicted by the Example Solution
- Slide 18
- What About Internal Heating? Two plausible possibilities: Compton recoil from hard X-rays Stellar heating if there is intense star-formation / L 4 ( r 2 + z 2 ) ( L X = L ) f reco i l / 3 = 2 ( r ; z )
- Slide 19
- Solutions with Internal Heating (L X /L)f comp = 0.02 L * /L = 0.05 radiation energy densitygas density
- Slide 20
- Range of Q and Permitted X = 0.01 or P = 0.005 X = 0.1 or P = 0.25
- Slide 21
- Conclusions Tori convert optical/UV flux to IR; there must therefore be a large IR flux through them Mid-IR opacity/mass ~ 1030 Thomson, increasing the effective F/F E by that factor With some simplifying assumptions, a self- consistent hydrostatic equilibrium and 2-d diffusive transfer solution can be found The torus becomes geometrically thick when L/L E ~ 0.030.3 and the midplane T ~ 1

Recommended

*View more*