Ferroelectricity induced by collinear magnetic order in Ising spin chain Yoshida lab Ryota Omichi.
Status of the THz Imaging...front 16 0.1-2.5THz BNA 1.9 2.1-2.25 234 Collinear 100-150 2.5 THz High...
Transcript of Status of the THz Imaging...front 16 0.1-2.5THz BNA 1.9 2.1-2.25 234 Collinear 100-150 2.5 THz High...
www.hi-jena.de
Status of the THz Imaging
Franz Roeder and Amrutha Gopal
PEB meeting 19.11.2019
2
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
Objectives
1. Design the optimum THz source
2. Find the required laser parameters
3. Choose the right THz wavelength
4. Find the suitable experimental geometry
5. Influence of Plasma cell parameters
3
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
Visualization of wakefields
ω p =nee
2
(ε0me )Plasma frequency
Refractive index n(ω ) = 1−ω p2
ω 2Plasma parameters:Rubidium vapor1014 – 1015 cm−3 λP = 1.1 – 3.3 mm
ωP~0.1THz
Expected plasma wavelength is of the order of mm
Wavelength (cm)
THz
4
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
THz source
Optical rectification
Sufficient power
Compact - no ionised radiation, in air
Simple set up in air and require only 10‘s mj laser energy
∇2E (ω ) − µ0ε(ω )∂2E (ω )
∂t 2= µ0
∂2P(ω )NL
∂t 2
Optical rectification
Difference Frequency mixing
Sum Frequencymixing
SHG
PNL- nonlinear polarization
Pi = ε0χij(1)Ej + ε0χijk
(2)EjEk + ε0χijl(3)EjEkEl + .....
5
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
THz crystal
High nonlinearityOptimum phase matching at the available laser wavelengthAgility of the setupLow absorption of both Pump and THz radiationSpectrum of the generated THz radiation
Material ng @800nm nph @1THz deff (pm/V) Setup Abs. Coeff (cm-1)
THz spectrum
ZnTe 3.13 3.17 68.5 Collinear 1.3 up to 4 THz
LiNbO3 2.25 4.96 168 Tilted pulse front
16 0.1-2.5THz
BNA 1.9 2.1-2.25 234 Collinear 100-150 2.5 THz
High nonlinearityLaser Wavelength : Ti-Saph (800 nm)
6
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
THz generation and detection
EO detection
Pyrometer
Ti-Saph laser
7
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
Our Laser system
Typical spectrum Modified spectrumdue to SPM
THz generation
8
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
Fluence dependence
Irradiated area: 0.77cm2
Dazzler setting
THz generation -Optimal laser parameters
T = xctan(θ )
J. Shan et al., Opt. Lett. 25, 426 (2000)
THz detection- Noncollinear EO scheme
10
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
THz Detection
11
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
Window Characterization
Sapphire
12
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
THz Detection
1. Coherent detection
13
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
EO measurements with sample
8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13t in ps
-50
0
50
100
150
200
|E THz| in a.u.
no samplepolycarbonatesapphire
14
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
EO measurements with samples
15
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
EO measurements with samples
Dispersion 500 µm ZnTe EO-crystal allows minimal time resolution of about 0.3 ps
polycarbonate: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.306.3833&rep=rep1&type=pdf
sapphire: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263835051_Optical_properties_of_silicon_sapphire_silica_and_glass_in_the_Terahertz_range
Temporal shift (ps)
Polycarbonate (n=1.6)
5mm thick
Sapphire (n=3.3)
1.6 mm thick No sample
Measured 10.83 ps 10.83 ps
Calculated 11ps 12.32 ps
THz pulse duration (ps)
1.06 1.25 0,568
16
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
Transmission measurements with samples
Reference: transmission of THz through 7 mm aperture to match size of Sapphire windows (2.02(±0.51) µJ)
2sapphire+2polycarbonate
2sapphire+1polycarbonate
2sapphire 1sapphire
TransmissiononPyrodetector
57% 66% 78% 89%
onlyfilter polycarbonate sapphire poly+sapphire
BPF@1THz 5.6% 79% 78% 64%
[email protected] 5.5% 84% 86% 68%
BPF@3THz 5.2% 84% 78% 65%
Bandpass filter measurementsEnergy without BP-filter: 12.9(±2.2) µJ
Transmission ratios are calculated in respect to transmission of filter as reference
17
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
Summary of the current work
•The best source for generating THz crystal is tested and crystal size and efficiency estimated.
•BNA crystals are optimum for generating THz with 800 nm Ti-Saph laser.
•0.2% is the conversion efficiency.
•For single-shot plasma imaging (1cm plasma) requires about 150 muJ of THz radiation (1.5 THz central freq)
•We propose coherent and incoherent THz imaging.
•Suppliers for the crystals and camera identified.
•Tested the transmission properties of the window materials of the plasma column.
18
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
THz Shadowgraphy
Current work at FSU/HIJ
Temporal resolution of the THz pulse is enough to observe the plasma wave
λp = 1-3 mm THz pulse < 3 ps
Other effects which need to taken into consideration
1. Diffraction 2. Scattering
Coherent Imaging
Detec.
onschem
eTi-Saph
Visualization of the plasma waveVisualization of the plasma wave +spectrally resolved density information
19
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
THz Shadowgraphy
Price ~ 95, 000 Euros
For single-shot plasma imaging (1cm plasma) requires about 20-25 muJ of THz radiation (1.5 THz central frequency)
320x240 pixels (50 µm) high sensitivity: 20 pw at 2,5 THzrange of coverage : 0.3 THz to 5 THz
BNA CRYSTAL LENSPLASMA
Ti-Saph
THz
i2S THz microbolometer camera
20
www.hi-jena.de
CoherentImaging
Large aperture EO crystal andBNA crystal
Estimated cost : 20,000 EurosFor single-shot plasma imaging (1cm plasma) requires about 150 muJ of THz radiation (1.5 THz)
Required laser energy : 150 mJ
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
BNA CRYSTAL
CCD
LENS
ANALYZER
EOCRYSTALLENSPLASMA
THz
Ti-Saph
21
www.hi-jena.dewww.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
Current work at FSU/HIJ
Next Beam time : January 2020 - 5 weeks
Delivery of large aperture BNA crystal : expected at the end of Dec 2019
Develop the Coherent imaging technique and image the plasma channel in a vacuum chamber equipped with Sapphire and poly carbonate windows - Dec’19
Design the plasma cell : December 2019
Explore funding for the i2s Camera
Development of algorithm for data extraction from the EO image : Dec’19 - Feb’20
Investigate the effects of diffraction and scattering in plasma for THz radiation : Dec’19 - Feb’20
22
www.hi-jena.de
Diffrac.oneffects
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
The spatial resolution of a far-field imaging system is limited by diffraction of the carrier wave
Δ = 1.22λ lD
When depth of field is much smaller than the object distance, it can be described as
L = δDlδ ′D ± D
δD required spatial resolution on the target
δ ′D required spatial resolution on the imaging plane
l distance from the target to the imaging lens
D aperture diameter of the lens
δ ′D = δD( ′l / l) ′l image distance (focal length of the lens for far field imaging)
In our case, to have a spatial resolution of 1 mm lD~ 2.73 to have a spatial resolution of 0.6 mm
lD~ 1.63
Size of the EO crystal DS ≈ DTfl
DT Dimension of the target
Thickness of the EO crystal ′L = δ ′D fD
≈ δ ′D2NA
23
www.hi-jena.de
A.Gopal
Current work at FSU/HIJ100 GW, Ti-Saph laser, 25fs, 3 mJ @ 10Hz