Neutrosophic Modeling and Control
description
Transcript of Neutrosophic Modeling and Control
/ d |ICCCT10| __________________________________ 978-1-4244-9034-/10/$26.002010 IEEE 718 Neutrosophic Modeling and Control Swati Aggarwal, Ranjit BiswasComputer Science and Engineering ITM University Gurgaon,India [email protected] A.Q.Ansari Electrical Engineering Jamia Milia Islamia New Delhi, India [email protected] Abstract---Quiterecently,NeutrosophicLogichasbeen proposed by Florentine Smarandache which is based on non-standardanalysisthatwasgivenbyAbrahamRobinsonin 1960s.NeutrosophicLogicwasdevelopedtorepresent mathematicalmodelofuncertainty,vagueness,ambiguity, imprecision,incompleteness,inconsistency,redundancyand contradictionindata[4],[5],[6],[7].Allthefactorsstatedare veryintegraltohumanthinking,asitisveryrarethatwe tendtoconclude/judgeindefiniteenvironments.Thispaper discusses how neutrosophic logic can be utilized for modeling andcontrolforwhichblockdiagramofneutrosophic inferencesystemisproposed,toillustratethisdesigningof relativelysimpleneutrosophicclassifierhasbeenattempted. Currentproblemsandfuturedirectionsforneutrosophic approaches are also addressed.
Keywords---neutrosophiclogic,neutrosophiccontrol, neutrosophic modeling I. INTRODUCTION Prof.L.Zadehhadrevolutionizedthefieldoflogicsby proposinganovelmulti-valuedlogic,fuzzylogicin1965 [14],whereeachelementinfuzzysethasadegreeof membership. It also has the provision of allowing linguistic variables whose truth values may vary between 0 and 1; in contrast to two values of classical Boolean logic [9].L-fuzzysetsweresuggestedbyGougenin1967[11]in whichanyL-fuzzysetAisassociatedwithafunctionAfromtheuniverseXtolatticeL,Interval-valuedfuzzyset (IVFS)whicharespecialcaseofL-fuzzysetsweregiven bySambucin1975[19]andfurtherbyTurksen[10], Belnap in 1977 defined four-valued logic [16] to cope with multipleinformationsources,withparameterstruth(T), false (F) , unknown(U), and contradiction (C).Fuzzy logic was extended by K. Atanassov in 1983 [12] to Intutionistic fuzzy sets on universe X where for any set A, xX,A(x)+A(x)1,whereA(x),A(x)refersto membershipandnon-membershipvalues,respectivelyof element x to set A.VaguesetsdefinedbyGauandBuehrerin1993[20],are characterizedbyatruthandfalsemembershipfunctions andisasetofobjects,eachofwhichhasagradeof membershipwhosevalueisacontinuoussubintervalof [0,1].Conceptofinterval-valuedintuionisticfuzzyset (IVIFS)wasgivenbyAtanassovin1999[12],wherein IVIFS on universe X an object A is defined such thatA={(x, MA (X), NA (x)), x X},with MA: X Int([0,1]) andNA:XInt([0,1]) and for all x X, sup MA (X) + sup NA (x) 1 Fuzzylogicisadominantentryinthedomainoflogics, which has been time and again tested and proved by many researchersthatitholdsthepotentialofgeneratingexact resultsfromimprecisedata.Computersimulationsofreal world working and human interpretations is an active thrust area;whereincomputersarehandicappedtomanipulate onlyprecisevaluations. This paperiswrittenwiththeaim ofsuggestingneutrosophiclogicthathasthepotentialof replacingallsortsoflogicsasitisageneralizedlogic which encompasses all other logics as its special instances. Neutrosophiclogicisabetteroptiontosimulatehuman brainworkingwhichisequippedwithdealingwith uncertainties and vagueness. II. DEFINITIONOFNEUTRSOPHICSET A logic in which each proposition is estimated tohavethe percentageoftruthinasubsetT,thepercentageof indeterminacy in a subset I, and the percentage of falsity in a subset F, is called neutrosophic logic [4]. Let T, I, F be standard or non-standard real subsets of ]-0, 1+ [, withsup T = t_sup, inf T = t_inf, sup I = i_sup, inf I = i_inf, sup F = f_sup, inf F = f_inf,and n_sup = t_sup+i_sup+f_sup, n_inf = t_inf+i_inf+f_inf. and n_inf = inf T + inf I + inf F -0, andn_sup = sup T + sup I + sup F 3+. / d |ICCCT10| 719 The sets T, I, F are not necessarilyintervals, but theymay beanyrealsub-unitarysubsets;discreteorcontinuous; single-element,finite,or(countableoruncountable) infinite; union or intersection of various subsets etc [4], [5], [6],[7].They may also overlap. We use a subset of truth (or indeterminacy,orfalsity),insteadofanumberonly, because in many cases we are not able to exactly determine thepercentagesoftruthandoffalsitybutapproximate them:forexampleapropositionistruebetween30-40% and between 60-70% false, even worst: between 30-40% or 45-50%true(accordingtovariousanalyzers),and60%or between 66-70% false [4]. OtheradvantageofutilizingNeutrosophiclogicisthatin comparisontootherlogics,itisnotconfinedtotherange of[0,1],andwelldistinguishesbetweenabsolute true/falsevaluesfromrelativetrue/falsevalues.Neutrosophiclogichastheprovisionofassigning>1as wellas1,this wouldimplyabsolutetrue/indeterminate/falsesimilarly whenevervaluesoft/i/f1)orunder driedvalues(1,andf