Multi-resolution models for large data sets › iam › meetings › 2013iam-meeting › day1... ·...

of 15 /15
Multi-resolution models for large data sets Douglas Nychka, National Center for Atmospheric Research National Science Foundation IAM Retreat, NCAR, August 2013

Embed Size (px)

Transcript of Multi-resolution models for large data sets › iam › meetings › 2013iam-meeting › day1... ·...

  • Multi-resolution models

    for large data sets

    Douglas Nychka,

    National Center for Atmospheric Research

    National Science Foundation IAM Retreat, NCAR, August 2013

  • Outline

    D. Nychka LatticeKrig 2

    • Surface observations of rainfall• Compact basis functions (Φ),

    Markov Random fields (H)

    • The multi-resolution model• Mean summer rainfall• Trends in rainfall

    Key idea: Introduce sparse basis and precisionmatrices without compromising the spatial model.

  • Estimating a curve or surface.

    D. Nychka LatticeKrig 3

    An additive statistical model:

    Given n pairs of observations (xi, yi), i = 1, . . . , n

    yi = g(xi) + �i

    �i’s are random errors and g is an unknown, smooth realization of a

    Gaussian process.

  • Observed mean summer precipitation

    D. Nychka LatticeKrig 4

    1720 stations reporting, ”mean” for 1950-2010

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    Observed JJA Precipitation ( .1 mm)

  • A 1-d cartoon ...

    D. Nychka LatticeKrig 5

    8 basis functions 8 (random) weights

    0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8

    −1.

    00.

    01.

    0

    weighted basis Random curve

    0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8

    −1.

    00.

    01.

    0

  • A Multiresolution

    D. Nychka LatticeKrig 6

    8 basis functions

    0 2 4 6 8

    16 basis functions

    0 2 4 6 8

    ...

  • Adding them up

    D. Nychka LatticeKrig 7

    0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8

    0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8

    0 2 4 6 8

  • Distributions of coefficients

    D. Nychka LatticeKrig 8

    Uncorrelated (stationary)

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    Different variability

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    Different Correlation

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

  • D. Nychka LatticeKrig 9

    Back to climate data

  • Some details for observed data:

    D. Nychka LatticeKrig 10

    • Used log transformation and weighted by number of observations• Used stereographic projection for locations• Elevation included as linear fixed effect.• Covariance parameters found by maximum likelihood

  • Predicted surface

    D. Nychka LatticeKrig 11

    Predicted surface Pointwise standard errors

    5 10 15 20 25 30cm

    (a)

    6 8 10 14 18Percent

    ● ●

    ● ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ● ●●

    ●●

    ● ●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ● ●●

    ●● ●

    ● ●

    ● ●●

    ●●●

    ●●

    ● ●●

    ● ●

    ● ●

    ●●

    ●●● ●

    ●●● ●

    ●●● ●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●●

    ● ●

    ●●●

    ● ●●

    ●●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●●

    ●●●

    ●●

    ● ●

    ●●

    ●● ●

    ●● ●

    ●● ●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ● ●●● ●

    ●●

    ●●● ●

    ●●

    ● ●●●

    ● ●

    ●●

    ● ●

    ●●

    ●●

    ● ●●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●● ●

    ● ●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ● ●

    ● ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ● ●●●

    ● ●

    ●●

    ● ●● ●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ● ● ●

    ●● ●

    ● ●

    ●●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●● ●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    ●●

    (b)

  • Breaking down into multi resolution

    D. Nychka LatticeKrig 12

    lon/lat Levels: 1 2 3

    6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7.0log cm

    (a)

    −1.0 −0.5 0.0log cm

    (b)

    −1.0 −0.5 0.0log cm

    (c)

    −1.0 −0.5 0.0log cm

    (d)

  • More on Uncertainty

    D. Nychka LatticeKrig 13

    EstimatedTrend in Summer Rainfall Average for Domain

    −1

    0

    1

    2

    Per

    cent

    cha

    nge

    per

    year

    Change in summer rainfall 1950−2010

    Percent change/year

    Fre

    quen

    cy

    0.06 0.10 0.14

    05

    1015

    20

    5% Lower Limit (.071) 95% Upper Limit (.121)

  • Summary

    D. Nychka LatticeKrig 14

    • Computational efficiency gained by compact basisfunctions and sparse precision matrix.

    • Flexibility in model to account for nonstationary spa-tial dependence.

    • Multi-resolution can approximate standard covariancefamilies (e.g. Matern)

    See LatticeKrig package in R

  • Thank you!

    D. Nychka LatticeKrig 15