Measuring δ13C of dissolved organic · 2014. 8. 1. · The evolution of seawater δ 13 C DOC 1968...
Transcript of Measuring δ13C of dissolved organic · 2014. 8. 1. · The evolution of seawater δ 13 C DOC 1968...
Measuring δ13C of dissolved organic carbon in freshwater and seawater
ASITA conference 2014
Karine Lalonde, Paul Middlestead, Yves Gélinas Concordia University, University of Ottawa
1
The seawater DOC challenge
• Large active pool of reduced carbon – (700 x 1015 g OC)
• For 1 L of seawater – 35g of salts – As low as 0.5mg OC
2
The evolution of seawater δ13CDOC
1968
1992
[Fry 1992] lyophilization V = 25 mL 3 hours Not automated
2003-2008
[Beaupré 2007] UV oxidation V = 30-650mL 4-5 hours Not automated
[Lang 2007], [Panetta 2008] HTC-DOC V = 5-10 mL 45 min Not automated
[St-Jean 2003], [Osburn 2007] Wet oxidation V = 10-25mL 20 min Not automated
NOW
HTC-DOC V = 5-10 mL 20 min automated
[Williams 1968] UV oxidation V = 1.8 L 6 hours Not automated
The old system
CO2
CO2
N2 (L)
4 Panetta (2008), Analytical Chemistry
6 x 150μL injections 45 minutes
The new system
CO2
CO2
Electric Cue
Electric Cue
5
CO2 trapping system
6
Special thanks to
Paul Middlestead G. G. HATCH Laboratory
Graham Hughes Graden Instruments
Humm
Benefits of Automation
• Fewer mistakes • Longer sequences
– Higher throughput – More controls – More replicates – Better standard deviations – Better idea of system limitations/capabilities
• Better relationship with your grad students./support staff
Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) analyzer: Water
and salt traps
IR detector
To IRMS Sam
ple
680oC
10
CO2 peak problems
• Peak from the DOC analyzer:
1. Tails due to differing combustion efficiencies
2. About 3 minutes wide 3. CO2 peak is in Oxygen
gas
• Peak requirements for IRMS
1. Peak should be as narrow and as intense as possible
2. Peak must be in He gas
11
CO2 Trapping system
CO2 from DOC
Heat to 250oC
12
CO2 Trapping system
O2 +CO2 from DOC
He gas
IRMS
O2 + CO2 He gas Not in use
13
CO2 Trapping system
CO2 trapped
O2 +CO2 from DOC
He gas
IRMS
O2 + CO2 He gas Not in use
Clean O2
14
CO2 Trapping system
CO2 trapped
O2 +CO2 from DOC
He gas
IRMS
O2 + CO2 He gas Not in use
Removed O2
15
CO2 Trapping system
CO2 trapped
O2 +CO2 from DOC
He gas
IRMS
O2 + CO2 He gas Not in use
Trap is heated to 250oC
16
It works!!
17
No matrix effects Little to no carry over from the combustion column
Sample true δ13C values
(‰)
DOC –IRMS δ13C PAUL (‰)
DOC –IRMS δ13C ConU (‰)
Sucrose (In-house) -11.77 -12.1 ± (NA) -11.6 ± (0.2)
KHP* -28.16 -27.8 ± (NA) -28.1 ± (0.2)
β-Alanine -26.18 -25.3 ± (NA) -26.1 ± (0.2)
Suwanee river fulvic acid -27.60 -27.4 ± (NA) -27.8 ± (0.2)
Deep Florida Straight water ? -20.6 ± (0.3) -19.9 ± (0.5)
*KHP = potassium hydrogen phthalate
How low can you go?
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Stan
dard
dev
iatio
n (‰
)
Concentration (ppm)
High blank contribution
Low blank contribution
Where does the blank come from?
• The blank comes from the column packing
• δ13C of the blank is between -20 & -12‰
• Pretty constant intensity and signature over one sequence
• Variable over many sequences – Must be corrected before
running samples
CO2
Accounting for the blank
-28
-24
-20
-16
-12
-8
-40 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
raw
δ13
C (‰
)
1/MH (nA-1)
Sucrose (-10.47‰)
β-Alanine (-26.18‰)
KHP(-28.16‰)
δb = (Slope / ηb) + δbc
IRMS blank intensity
Testing combustion efficiency
KHP, δ13C = -28.2‰
Enriched algae δ13C = +11.6‰
sucrose, δ13C = -10.5‰
Incomplete combustion results in δ13C shifts 100% combustion δ13C = -9 ‰ 5% of KHP is not combusted = -7.6 ‰
Incomplete combustion results in no δ13C shifts δ13C always = -10.5 ‰
DOC system pressure and combustion
-12
-11
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-420 25 30
δ13 C
(‰)
System pressure (PSI)
KHP/algae mix = -9.0‰
IAEA sucrose = -10.5‰
Injection volume and combustion
-12
-11
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-51500 1200 750 500
δ13 C
(‰
)
Injection Volume (μL)
KHP/algae mix = -9.0‰
IAEA sucrose = -10.5‰
Seawater.. Is it possible?
• Matrix does not affect combustion efficiency • Low concentration of seawater DOC are
problematic – Lowest possible standard deviations are ± 0.5‰ at 0.5
ppm • See Andrew Barber’s poster tonight!
δ13C signature in the SLE (‰)
26
Salinity (psu)
Acknowledgements
27
Yves Gélinas
Alfonso Mucci
Committee members
• Xavier Ottenwaelder
• Cameron Skinner
Lab members
• Andrew Barber
• Mina Ibrahim
• Alexandre Ouellet
• Anja Moritz
• Rob Panetta
Technical Help and Others
• Anssi Vähätalo
• Paul Middlestead (University of Ottawa)
• Graham Hughes (OI technologies)
• Alain Tessier (CBAMS)
• Richard and Aldo (Machine shop)
• Dan (Electronics Shop)