Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4...

35
Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1

Transcript of Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4...

Page 1: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

Jim Matthews

Louisiana State University

Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory

ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 20121

Page 2: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

~ E-2.7

~ E-3.1 Above 1020 eV (50 Joules!):

Φ ≈ 1 per km2 per century

Very low flux …

Very big detectors

2

Page 3: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

ArgentinaAustralia

Bolivia*

BrasilCroatia

Czech RepublicFrance

GermanyHolland

ItalyPoland Mexico

NetherlandsPortugalRomaniaSlovenia

Spain United Kingdom

USAVietnam*

~ 500 Scientists

20 Countries 3

Page 4: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

Aims of the experiment

• Measure the energy spectrum of high energy cosmic rays up to and beyond energies of 1020 eV

• Determine the sources of these cosmic rays• Determine the elemental composition of cosmic

rays• Study extensive air showers -> particle

interactions

4

Page 5: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

How to get particles to extreme energy

• Fermi Acceleration (Bottom-Up)

- repeated encounters with strong plasma shocks

- naturally produces power-law with correct index

- maximum energy can be extremely large

- observed in nature

• “Exotic” (Top-Down)

- decay of massive relic particles

- interaction of nu’s w/cosmic background neutrinos (-> Z)

- topological defects, other things ?

- Signature: protons, photons, neutrinos

5

Page 6: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

“GZK”

First pointed out in 1966 in two papers, one by Greisen and one by Zatsepin & Kuz’min

p + (2.7oK) p +

6

Nuclei photo-disintegrate at similar thresholds, distances

Page 7: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

7

Page 8: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

Surface Arrays and Fluorescence Detection

- Arrays: 24/7 operation, very large size (statistics)

- Fluorescence: ‘calorimetry’ = good energy resolution (spectrum)

8

Page 9: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

38° South, Argentina, Mendoza, Malargue

9

Page 10: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

Surface Array 1650 detector stations 1.5 Km spacing 3000 km2

Fluorescence Detectors 4 Telescope enclosures 6 Telescopes per

enclosure 24 Telescopes total

Design: AGASA spectrum > 100 events/yr above 1020 eV 10

Page 11: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

View of Los Leones Fluorescence Site

11

Page 12: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

The Fluorescence

Detector

3.4 m spherical mirror

PMT cameraSpherical surface

camera440 PMT with light

collectorsLarge 300x300 field of

view1.5º pixel fov

(spot 1/3 of pixel)

FADC trace

100 s

12

Page 13: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

Energy reconstructed from measured maximum size --- calorimetric (minimal MC) 13

Page 14: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

Reconstructed longitudinal profiles

14

Page 15: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

15

μ

e

Page 16: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

16

Page 17: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

17

Page 18: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

θ~ 48º, ~ 70 EeV (7 x 1019 eV)

Lateral density distribution

18 detectors triggered

km

18

Page 19: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

“Deep” shower

(particles per square meter)

“High” shower

R ≈ 1000m

19

Page 20: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

SD Energy Calibration

The power of hybrid…..Does NOT rely on shower simulation

FD

SD

ESD = A (S38)b

b ~ 1

SD Energy resolutionbetter than 20%

20

Page 21: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

21

Includes hybrid data (See Settimo & Auger Collab, EPJ (2012))

Page 22: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

22

“Infill”

Page 23: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

23

Here: from 2011 ICRC

Page 24: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

Inferring the Primary Mass

Variation of Depth of Shower Maximum with Energy

**********

**********

****Xmax

log E

p

Fe

24

Xmax correlates tightly with the depth of 1st interaction

Page 25: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

Nuclear Composition: Shower Depths of Maximum Xmax

These suggest high cross section and high multiplicity at high energy.

Heavy nuclei?

Or protons interacting differently than expected? (See Nellen presentation, this meeting)

Statistics lacking for the (anisotropic) trans-GZK energy regime!

(Crucial for calculation of the diffuse cosmogenic neutrino flux)

Anisotropy Anisotropy

25Physical Review Letters 104 (2010) 091101

Page 26: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

26

SD: Development of Muons in Shower

SD: Asymmetry of Shower front thickness

FD: Mean depth of Shower Max

FD: Fluctuations of Shower Max

Spectral “Ankle”

Page 27: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

27

Presentation by Nellen: Data show more muons than simulations

Page 28: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

28

“Tail” dominated by protons

Proton-Air Cross Section from the Depth of Shower Maximum

Page 29: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

29

To appear in Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012

Page 30: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

30

To appear in Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012

Page 31: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

31

See presentation of Navarro at this meeting …

Photon limits

Page 32: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

32

See presentation of Navarro at this meeting …

Page 33: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

Summary

• Energy spectrum exhibits ankle and GZK suppression

• The sources are extragalactic, within the “GZK sphere”: (weak) anisotropy persists above ~60 EeV

• The composition is baryonic, appearing to become iron-dominated (or new particle physics … models do not give enough muons)

• p-Air, p-p cross sections beyond the LHC energy

• Few/no photons or neutrinos (disfavors exotic “top down” models) • Photons/neutrinos nearing GZK regime 33

Page 34: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

34

What’s Next?

Auger has been “operating” since 2004, fully deployed since 2008. The international agreement runs for 3.5 more years (end of 2015)

We hope to continue after that, are exploring new technologies in use now or can be started very soon …

-- Auger Engineering Radio Array - AERA - see presentation by Fraenkel

-- Microwave, GHz, ... prototypes operating

-- Focus on better composition determination through new muon detectors, new flourescence techniques, … R&D

спасибо

Page 35: Jim Matthews Louisiana State University Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory ECRS, Moscow, 4 July 2012 1.

35

спасибо