Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts...

5
Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts weakens glucose intolerance in mice fed a HFD. (A) Histomorphometric analysis of vertebrae of WT and α1(I)Col-InsR mice fed a ND (n=8), (B) Serum Ctx levels in WT and α1(I)Col-InsR mice fed a ND, (C) Serum osteocalcin levels in WT and α1(I)Col-InsR mice fed a ND (n=8), (D) qPCR analysis of the expression of Glut1, Glut3 and Glut4 in bones of WT and α1(I)Col-InsR fed a ND or HFD (n=5). (E) Western blot analysis of the phosphorylation levels of the INSR and AKT in liver and WAT of WT and α1(I)Col-InsR mice fed a ND or a HFD. All Western blot experiments were repeated at least three times.*P<0.05. WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND A B 0 Expression relative to control (fold) 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Glut1 Glut3 Glut4 WT HFD C Osteocalcin level(ng/ml) 50 200 0 100 150 Total-Ocn Glu13-Ocn 250 300 D INSR P-INSR (Y1150/Y1151) `<ACTIN P-AKT (S473) AKT Insulin: 0.5u/kg - + - + - + - + ND HFD ND HFD Liver - + - + - + - + ND HFD ND HFD WAT WT WT E * * BV/TV (%) 5 10 0 15 Oc.S/BS (%) 5 10 0 15 20 BFR/BS (+m 3 /+m 2 /y) 0 50 100 150 200 Serum Ctx(ng/ml) 5 10 0 15 20 25 Tg WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND Tg WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND Tg WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND Tg Col1a1-INSR HFD Tg Col1a1-INSR Tg Col1a1-INSR Tg

Transcript of Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts...

Page 1: Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts …dm5migu4zj3pb.cloudfront.net/manuscripts/72000/72323/JCI...150 Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts weakens

Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts weakens glucose intolerance in mice fed a HFD.

(A) Histomorphometric analysis of vertebrae of WT and α1(I)Col-InsR mice fed a ND (n=8), (B) Serum Ctx levels in WT and α1(I)Col-InsR mice fed a ND, (C) Serum osteocalcin levels in WT and α1(I)Col-InsR mice fed a ND (n=8), (D) qPCR analysis of the expression of Glut1, Glut3 and Glut4 in bones of WT and α1(I)Col-InsR fed a ND or HFD (n=5). (E) Western blot analysis of the phosphorylation levels of the INSR and AKT in liver and WAT of WT and α1(I)Col-InsR mice fed a ND or a HFD. All Western blot experiments were repeated at least three times.*P<0.05.

WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND

A B

0Exp

ress

ion

rel

ativ

eto

co

ntr

ol (

fold

)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Glut1 Glut3 Glut4

WT HFD

C

Ost

eoca

lcin

leve

l(ng/

ml)

50

200

0

100

150

Total-Ocn Glu13-Ocn

250

300

D

INSR

P-INSR(Y1150/Y1151)

`<ACTIN

P-AKT(S473)

AKT

Insulin: 0.5u/kg - + - + - + - + ND HFD ND HFD

Liver

- + - + - + - + ND HFD ND HFD

WAT WT WT

E

* *

BV/

TV (%

)

5

10

0

15

Oc.

S/B

S (%

)5

10

0

15

20

BFR

/BS

(+m

3 /+m

2 /y)

050

100

150

200

Seru

m C

tx(n

g/m

l)

5

10

0

15

2025

Tg WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND

TgWT ND Col1a1-INSR ND

Tg

WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND

Tg

Col1a1-INSR HFDTg

Col1a1-INSR Tg Col1a1-INSR Tg

Page 2: Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts …dm5migu4zj3pb.cloudfront.net/manuscripts/72000/72323/JCI...150 Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts weakens

Figure S2. Compromising insulin signaling in osteoblasts worsens glucose intolerance in mice fed a HFD

(A) Histomorphometric analysis of vertebrae of InsRosb+/- mice fed a ND (n=8), (B) Serum Ctx levels in InsR fl/+ and InsRosb+/- mice fed a ND, (C) Serum osteocalcin levels in InsR fl/+ and InsRosb+/- mice fed a ND (n=8), (D) qPCR analysis of the expression of Glut1, Glut3 and Glut4 in bones of InsR fl/+ and InsRosb+/- mice fed a ND or HFD (n=5). (E) Western blot analysis of the phosphorylation levels of the INSR and AKT in liver and WAT of InsR fl/+ and InsRosb+/- mice fed a ND or a HFD. All Western blot experiments were repeated at least three times. *P<0.05.

D

0Exp

ress

ion

rel

ativ

eto

co

ntr

ol (

fold

)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Glut1 Glut3 Glut4

Ost

eoca

lcin

leve

l(ng/

ml)

Total-Ocn Glu13-Ocn

50

200

0

100

150

250

300

BA Insr ND C

INSR

P-INSR(Y1150/Y1151)

`<ACTIN

P-AKT(S473)

AKT

Insulin: 0.5u/kg - + - + - + - + ND HFD ND HFD

Liver

- + - + - + - + ND HFD ND HFD

WATE

Seru

m C

tx(n

g/m

l)

10

20

0

30

40

BV/

TV (%

)

10

20

0

30

Oc.

S/B

S (%

)5

10

0

15

20

025

50

75

100

BFR

/BS

(+m

3 /+m

2 /y)

* *

fl/+

Col1a1-Insr ND +/- Insr ND fl/+

Col1a1-Insr ND +/- Insr ND fl/+

Col1a1-Insr ND +/-

Insr fl/+ Col1a1-Insr +/-

Insr HFD fl/+

Col1a1-Insr HFD +/-

Insr ND fl/+

Col1a1-Insr ND +/-Insr fl/+

Col1a1-Insr +/-

Page 3: Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts …dm5migu4zj3pb.cloudfront.net/manuscripts/72000/72323/JCI...150 Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts weakens

Figure S3. Insulin resistance develops in bone of mice fed a HFD

(A-B) Random glucose (A) and insulin (B) levels of WT mice fed a ND or HFD (n=8). (C-D) GTT (C) and ITT (D) of WT mice fed a ND or HFD (n=7). (E) ELISA analyses of serum levels of leptin, norepinephrine and epinephrine in mice fed a ND or a HFD (n=5). (F-H) ELISA analysis of serum levels of adiponectin in WT (F), α1(I)Col-InsR (G) and InsRosb+/- mice(H) fed a fed a ND or a HFD (n=6). (I-K) qPCR analysis of the expression of Adiponectin in WAT of WT (I), α1(I)Col-InsR (J) and InsRosb+/- mice (K) fed a fed a ND or a HFD (n=5). *P<0.05.

Blo

od

Glu

co

se

(m

g/d

l)

50

0

100

150

200

1.0

2.0

Se

ru

m I

ns

uli

n (

ng

/ml)*

A B

Blo

od

Glu

co

se

(m

g/d

l)

400

300

200

100

Min. after glucose injection

D

0 30 60 120

% o

f In

itia

l G

luc

os

e

100

80

60

Min. after insulin injection

0 30 60 90 120

CND

HFD

ND

HFD

*

1.5

0.5

0

ND

HFD

ND

HFD

40

Are

a U

nd

er t

he

Cu

rv

e

2000

0

4000

6000

10000 *

8000

Are

a U

nd

er t

he

Cu

rv

e

0

10000

20000

30000

*

Seru

m L

ep

tin

(ng

/ml)

10

20

0

30

40

*

ND

HFD

No

rep

inep

hrin

e (

ng

/ml)

10

15

0

20

25

5

Ep

inep

hrin

e (

ng

/ml)

2

3

0

4

5

1

E

Seru

m A

dip

on

ecti

n(n

g/m

l)

10

20

0

30

*

ND

HFD

F

G

Seru

m A

dip

on

ecti

n(n

g/m

l)

10

20

0

30

H

Seru

m A

dip

on

ecti

n(n

g/m

l)

5

10

0

15

20

*

ND

HFD

I J K

Rela

tive m

RN

A level

0.5

1.0

0

1.5

Rela

tive m

RN

A level

0.5

1.0

0

1.5

Rela

tive m

RN

A level

0.5

1.0

0

1.5

**

** *

* **

WT HFD

WT ND

Col1a1-INSR NDTg

Col1a1-INSR HFDTg

WT HFD

WT ND

Col1a1-INSR NDTg

Col1a1-INSR HFDTg

Insr HFD fl/+

Col1a1-Insr HFD +/-

Insr ND fl/+

Col1a1-Insr ND +/-

Insr HFD fl/+

Col1a1-Insr HFD +/-

Insr ND fl/+

Col1a1-Insr ND +/-

Page 4: Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts …dm5migu4zj3pb.cloudfront.net/manuscripts/72000/72323/JCI...150 Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts weakens

Figure S4. HFD decreases bone resorption in an insulin dependent manner.

(A-C) microCT analysis of proximal femur of WT and α1(I)Col-InsR mice fed a ND or HFD (n=4). Trabecular bone volume over total tissue volume (A), Cortical bone volume over total tissue volume (B) and mid-shaft cortical bone thickness (C) were measured. *P<0.05.

A B CTr

abec

ular

BV/

TV (%

)

2

4

0

6

*

**

Cor

tical

bon

e B

V/TV

(%)

25

50

0

75

Mid

shaf

t Th.

(mm

)

0.1

0.2

0

0.3

100

WT HFD

WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND

Tg

Col1a1-INSR HFDTg

WT HFD

WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND

Tg

Col1a1-INSR HFDTg

WT HFD

WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND

Tg

Col1a1-INSR HFDTg

Page 5: Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts …dm5migu4zj3pb.cloudfront.net/manuscripts/72000/72323/JCI...150 Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts weakens

Figure S5. Lipotoxicity caused insulin resistance in osteoblasts

(A). Western blot analysis of levels of P-IRS1 at Serine 307 in primary osteoblasts treated with 200µM stearate or vehicle.

IRS1

P-IRS1 (S307)

Veh

icle

Stea

rate

A