Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts...
Transcript of Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts...
Figure S1. Increasing insulin signaling in osteoblasts weakens glucose intolerance in mice fed a HFD.
(A) Histomorphometric analysis of vertebrae of WT and α1(I)Col-InsR mice fed a ND (n=8), (B) Serum Ctx levels in WT and α1(I)Col-InsR mice fed a ND, (C) Serum osteocalcin levels in WT and α1(I)Col-InsR mice fed a ND (n=8), (D) qPCR analysis of the expression of Glut1, Glut3 and Glut4 in bones of WT and α1(I)Col-InsR fed a ND or HFD (n=5). (E) Western blot analysis of the phosphorylation levels of the INSR and AKT in liver and WAT of WT and α1(I)Col-InsR mice fed a ND or a HFD. All Western blot experiments were repeated at least three times.*P<0.05.
WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND
A B
0Exp
ress
ion
rel
ativ
eto
co
ntr
ol (
fold
)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Glut1 Glut3 Glut4
WT HFD
C
Ost
eoca
lcin
leve
l(ng/
ml)
50
200
0
100
150
Total-Ocn Glu13-Ocn
250
300
D
INSR
P-INSR(Y1150/Y1151)
`<ACTIN
P-AKT(S473)
AKT
Insulin: 0.5u/kg - + - + - + - + ND HFD ND HFD
Liver
- + - + - + - + ND HFD ND HFD
WAT WT WT
E
* *
BV/
TV (%
)
5
10
0
15
Oc.
S/B
S (%
)5
10
0
15
20
BFR
/BS
(+m
3 /+m
2 /y)
050
100
150
200
Seru
m C
tx(n
g/m
l)
5
10
0
15
2025
Tg WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND
TgWT ND Col1a1-INSR ND
Tg
WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND
Tg
Col1a1-INSR HFDTg
Col1a1-INSR Tg Col1a1-INSR Tg
Figure S2. Compromising insulin signaling in osteoblasts worsens glucose intolerance in mice fed a HFD
(A) Histomorphometric analysis of vertebrae of InsRosb+/- mice fed a ND (n=8), (B) Serum Ctx levels in InsR fl/+ and InsRosb+/- mice fed a ND, (C) Serum osteocalcin levels in InsR fl/+ and InsRosb+/- mice fed a ND (n=8), (D) qPCR analysis of the expression of Glut1, Glut3 and Glut4 in bones of InsR fl/+ and InsRosb+/- mice fed a ND or HFD (n=5). (E) Western blot analysis of the phosphorylation levels of the INSR and AKT in liver and WAT of InsR fl/+ and InsRosb+/- mice fed a ND or a HFD. All Western blot experiments were repeated at least three times. *P<0.05.
D
0Exp
ress
ion
rel
ativ
eto
co
ntr
ol (
fold
)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Glut1 Glut3 Glut4
Ost
eoca
lcin
leve
l(ng/
ml)
Total-Ocn Glu13-Ocn
50
200
0
100
150
250
300
BA Insr ND C
INSR
P-INSR(Y1150/Y1151)
`<ACTIN
P-AKT(S473)
AKT
Insulin: 0.5u/kg - + - + - + - + ND HFD ND HFD
Liver
- + - + - + - + ND HFD ND HFD
WATE
Seru
m C
tx(n
g/m
l)
10
20
0
30
40
BV/
TV (%
)
10
20
0
30
Oc.
S/B
S (%
)5
10
0
15
20
025
50
75
100
BFR
/BS
(+m
3 /+m
2 /y)
* *
fl/+
Col1a1-Insr ND +/- Insr ND fl/+
Col1a1-Insr ND +/- Insr ND fl/+
Col1a1-Insr ND +/-
Insr fl/+ Col1a1-Insr +/-
Insr HFD fl/+
Col1a1-Insr HFD +/-
Insr ND fl/+
Col1a1-Insr ND +/-Insr fl/+
Col1a1-Insr +/-
Figure S3. Insulin resistance develops in bone of mice fed a HFD
(A-B) Random glucose (A) and insulin (B) levels of WT mice fed a ND or HFD (n=8). (C-D) GTT (C) and ITT (D) of WT mice fed a ND or HFD (n=7). (E) ELISA analyses of serum levels of leptin, norepinephrine and epinephrine in mice fed a ND or a HFD (n=5). (F-H) ELISA analysis of serum levels of adiponectin in WT (F), α1(I)Col-InsR (G) and InsRosb+/- mice(H) fed a fed a ND or a HFD (n=6). (I-K) qPCR analysis of the expression of Adiponectin in WAT of WT (I), α1(I)Col-InsR (J) and InsRosb+/- mice (K) fed a fed a ND or a HFD (n=5). *P<0.05.
Blo
od
Glu
co
se
(m
g/d
l)
50
0
100
150
200
1.0
2.0
Se
ru
m I
ns
uli
n (
ng
/ml)*
A B
Blo
od
Glu
co
se
(m
g/d
l)
400
300
200
100
Min. after glucose injection
D
0 30 60 120
% o
f In
itia
l G
luc
os
e
100
80
60
Min. after insulin injection
0 30 60 90 120
CND
HFD
ND
HFD
*
1.5
0.5
0
ND
HFD
ND
HFD
40
Are
a U
nd
er t
he
Cu
rv
e
2000
0
4000
6000
10000 *
8000
Are
a U
nd
er t
he
Cu
rv
e
0
10000
20000
30000
*
Seru
m L
ep
tin
(ng
/ml)
10
20
0
30
40
*
ND
HFD
No
rep
inep
hrin
e (
ng
/ml)
10
15
0
20
25
5
Ep
inep
hrin
e (
ng
/ml)
2
3
0
4
5
1
E
Seru
m A
dip
on
ecti
n(n
g/m
l)
10
20
0
30
*
ND
HFD
F
G
Seru
m A
dip
on
ecti
n(n
g/m
l)
10
20
0
30
H
Seru
m A
dip
on
ecti
n(n
g/m
l)
5
10
0
15
20
*
ND
HFD
I J K
Rela
tive m
RN
A level
0.5
1.0
0
1.5
Rela
tive m
RN
A level
0.5
1.0
0
1.5
Rela
tive m
RN
A level
0.5
1.0
0
1.5
**
** *
* **
WT HFD
WT ND
Col1a1-INSR NDTg
Col1a1-INSR HFDTg
WT HFD
WT ND
Col1a1-INSR NDTg
Col1a1-INSR HFDTg
Insr HFD fl/+
Col1a1-Insr HFD +/-
Insr ND fl/+
Col1a1-Insr ND +/-
Insr HFD fl/+
Col1a1-Insr HFD +/-
Insr ND fl/+
Col1a1-Insr ND +/-
Figure S4. HFD decreases bone resorption in an insulin dependent manner.
(A-C) microCT analysis of proximal femur of WT and α1(I)Col-InsR mice fed a ND or HFD (n=4). Trabecular bone volume over total tissue volume (A), Cortical bone volume over total tissue volume (B) and mid-shaft cortical bone thickness (C) were measured. *P<0.05.
A B CTr
abec
ular
BV/
TV (%
)
2
4
0
6
*
**
Cor
tical
bon
e B
V/TV
(%)
25
50
0
75
Mid
shaf
t Th.
(mm
)
0.1
0.2
0
0.3
100
WT HFD
WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND
Tg
Col1a1-INSR HFDTg
WT HFD
WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND
Tg
Col1a1-INSR HFDTg
WT HFD
WT ND Col1a1-INSR ND
Tg
Col1a1-INSR HFDTg
Figure S5. Lipotoxicity caused insulin resistance in osteoblasts
(A). Western blot analysis of levels of P-IRS1 at Serine 307 in primary osteoblasts treated with 200µM stearate or vehicle.
IRS1
P-IRS1 (S307)
Veh
icle
Stea
rate
A