Fabrication techniques for Metal MEMS like as Metal Micro Pump
Experimental Study on Transition Metal Complexes ...
Transcript of Experimental Study on Transition Metal Complexes ...
Experimental Study on Transition Metal Complexes
Containing N,S'-, S,S'- and O,O'- Coordinated π
Radicals
Dissertation for the degree of Doktor der Naturwissenschaften in the
Fakultät für Chemie at the Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Presented by
Ruta R. Kapre
Mülheim an der Ruhr, June 2005
This work was independently carried out between August 2002 and May 2005 at the
Max-Planck-Institut für Bioanorganische Chemie, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.
Submitted on: 10- 06 - 2005 Examination: 15-07-2005
Examination Committee:
Prof. Dr. K. Wieghardt (Referent)
Prof. Dr. W. S. Sheldrick (Koreferent)
Prof. Dr. W. Sander (Prüfer)
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank everyone who supported me and help me during the
course of this work. I am especially indebted to:
Prof. Dr. K. Wieghardt, to whom I express my deepest gratitude for giving me an
opportunity to join his group and perform research in this fascinating theme. His
unbridled support and encouragement have contributed a lot in sustaining my efforts.
Prof. Dr. P. Chaudhuri for many helpful suggestions.
Dr. Thomas Weyhermüller and Mrs. Heike Schucht for X-ray crystal structure analyses.
Dr. E. Bothe and Mrs. Petra Höfer for electrochemical measurements.
Dr E. Bill for teaching me the basics of the EPR and magnetochemistry, helping me in
the simulation of EPR spectra and in interpreting my results.
Dr. F. Neese for valuable suggestions regarding the interpretation of XAS data.
I am also thankful to Dr Joris van Slageren, Universität Stuttgart, Germany, for the Far-
IR measurements.
Dr. S. DeBeer George, Stanford Institute, USA, for providing the XAS data and helping
me to the interpretation of the XAS results.
Mr. A. Göbels and Mr. F. Reikowski for measurements of SQUID and EPR.
Mrs. R. Wagner, and Mr. U. Pieper for their help in the laboratory.
Dr. Kil Sik Min for an invaluable help in the lab at the inception of my stay in Muelheim.
Dr. Nuria Aliaga-Alcade, for her useful ideas, checking manuscript and for cheerfulness
throughout my work. For keeping my spirits up and enriching me.
I am very thankful to Dr. John F. Berry for the careful revision of the manuscript, many
fruitful suggestions and honing my final draft.
Special thanks to my colleagues Dr. Krzysztof Chłopek, Dr. Kallol Ray, Dr. Laurent
Benisvy, Dr. Kathrin Merz, Dr. Yufei Song, Dr. Isabelle Sylvestre, Mr. Sumit Khanra,
Mr. Chandan Mukherjee, Mr. Shaon Presow, Dr. Taras Petrenko, Ms. Elham Safaei for
lots of help and a friendly atmosphere in the lab.
Mrs. Jutta Theurich for ordered publications.
I am very much grateful to my mother and father for their motivation and their
immeasurable support and eminent understanding through out the years, and my sister
Reshma and brother Hrishikesh for their love and encouragement.
I am highly indebted to Sachin, for inspiration and many valuable suggestions. I thank
him for invaluable support.
Last but not the least to all my friends, Suchismita, Mamata, Basak family and all my
well-wishers in India for inspirations and friendly help.
I am thankful to the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG) for financial support.
To my dear parents
Contents and abbr. i
Contents Page
numbers Chapter 1 Introduction
1
1.1 General introduction 1
1.2 Objective of this work 4
1.3 Characterization techniques 7
1.4 References 13
Chapter 2 Cobalt complexes of o-aminothiophenolate [As(Ph)4] [Co(LNS)2] (1) and [N(n-Bu)4] [Co(LNS)2] (2)
15
2.1 Introduction 15
2.2 Synthesis and characterization of 1and 2 18
2.3 Molecular structures of 1and 2 18
2.4 Electrochemistry of 1 21
2.5 Electronic absorption spectra 25
2.6 EPR spectroscopy 26
2.7 Magnetization 28
2.8 Conclusions 32
2.9 References 33
Chapter 3 Cuboidal complexes of chromium with 3,5-di-tert-butyl-aminothiophenol Na[Cr3(tLNS)3(OEt)3(µ-OMe)4(OHEt)4] (3) Na[Cr3(tLNS)3(OMe)3(µ-OMe)4(OHMe)3] (4a) Na [Cr3(tLNS)3(OMe)3(µ-OMe)4(OH2)3] (4b)
35
3.1 Introduction 35 3.2 Synthesis and characterization of 3 and 4 36 3.3 Molecular structures of 3, 4a and 4b 37 3.4 Electrochemistry of 3 43 3.5 Electronic absorption spectra 44
Contents and abbr. ii
3.6 Magnetochemistry 45
3.7 Conclusions 50
3.8 References 51
Chapter 4 Ni, Co and Zn complexes of 2-phenylbenzothiazoline
53
4.1 Introduction 53
4.2 Synthesis and characterization of 5, 5b, 6, 6b and 7 56
4.3 Molecular structures of 5, 5b, 6, 6b and 7 58
4.4 Electrochemistry of 5 and 6 66
4.5 Electronic absorption spectra 69
4.6 X-band EPR spectroscopy and magnetic susceptibility 73
4.7 Conclusions 81
4.8 References 82
Chapter 5 Cr complexes of 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-benzenedithiol and 3,6-di-tert-butyl-catacholate [N(n-Bu)4][Cr(tLSS)3] (8), [As(Ph)4][CrO(tLSS)2] (9), [Cr(tLCat)3] (10), [Co(Cp)2][Cr(tLCat)3] (10b)
85
5.1 Introduction 85
5.2 Synthesis and characterization of 8, 9, 10 and 10b 88
5.3 Molecular structures of 8, 9 and 10 89
5.4 Electrochemistry of 8, 9 and 10 96
5.5 Electronic absorption spectra 100
5.6 X-band EPR spectroscopy and magnetic susceptibility 104
5.7 Conclusions 110
5.8 References 111
Contents and abbr. iii
Chapter 6 Mo and W complexes of 2-mercapto-3,5-di-tert-butylaniline and 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-benzenedithiol [Mo(tLNS)3] (11), [Mo(tLSS)3] (12), [N(n-Bu)4][Mo(tLSS)3] (12b), [W(tLSS)3] (13), [N(n-Bu)4] [W(tLSS)3] (13b)
115
6.1 Introduction 115
6.2 Synthesis and characterization of 11, 12, 12b, 13 and 13b 117
6.3 Molecular structures of 11, 12, 12b, 13 and 13b 118
6.4 Electrochemistry 129
6.5 Electronic absorption spectra 133
6.6 EPR spectroscopy and magnetization 137
6.7 Conclusions 141
6.8 References 142
Chapter 7 XAS of Cr, Mo and W complexes
145
7.1 Introduction 145
7.2 Results and analysis 146
7.3 Conclusions 153
7.4 References 154
Chapter 8 Summary
157
Chapter 9 Experimental
163
9.1 Synthetic procedures 163
9.2 Methods and equipments 187
Appendices 193
1. Magnetochemical data 194
2. Crystallographic data 203
3. Curriculum vitae 213
Contents and abbr. iv
Abbreviations Technical terms:
AF : antiferromagnetic
Ag / AgNO3 : reference electrode
av. : average
B : magnetic field
CT : charge transfer
D : zero-field splitting
deg. : degree (°)
e- : electron
E : total energy
exp. : experimental
Fc/Fc+ : internal electrochemical standard
H : Hamiltonian
J : coupling constant ( cm-1)
m/z : mass per charge
RT : room temperature (293K)
S : electron spin
sim. : simulated
TIP : temperature independent paramagnetism
units:
Å : angstrom (10-10 m)
cm : centimeter
emu : electromagnetic unit
G : gauss
h : hour
K : Kelvin
m : meter
M : molar
min. : minute
Contents and abbr. v
mm : millimeter
nm : nanometer (10-9 m)
s : second
T : tesla
V : volts
µB : bohr magneton
latin expressions:
ca. : around
et a. : and coworkers
e.g. : for example
i.e. : namely
tert- : tertiary
vs. : versus, against
symbols:
λ : wavelength (nm)
ε : extinction coefficient (M-1cm-1)
µeff : magnetic moment (µB)
solvents and reagents:
Cat.: catechol
CH2Cl2 : dichloromethane
CHCl3 : chloroform
Et2O : diethylether
Et3N : triethylamine
EtOH : ethanol
HCl : hydrogen chloride
KBr : potassium bromide
MeOH : methanol
MeCN : acetonitrile
NaOMe : sodium methoxide
Contents and abbr. vi
TBAPF6 : tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate
THF : tetrahydrofuran
techniques:
CV : cyclic voltammetry
EA : elemental analysis
EI : electron ionisation
EPR : electron paramagnetic resonance
ESI : electrospray ionisation
IR : infrared spectroscopy
MS: mass spectroscopy
SQUID : superconducting quantum interface device
SW : square wave voltammetry
UV-Vis : ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy
XAS : X-ray absorption spectroscopy
Chapter 1 1
1.1 General introduction
It is well known that transition metal ions comprise the active sites of
certain enzymes, providing binding sites for substrates and thereby activating the
appropriate bonds of the substrates. Transition metals have a unique accessibility of
variable oxidation states, can act as reservoirs for electrons by accepting and donating
electrons during redox cycles and stabilize otherwise very reactive amino acid radicals,
e.g., phenoxyl radicals in tyrosine residues, thiyl radicals in cysteine residues etc. The
realization of the widespread occurrence of amino-acid radicals in enzyme catalysis has
recently been documented in the literature,1 and the discovery of tyrosine radicals in
various metalloproteins involved in oxygen dependent enzymatic catalysis3 has prompted
continued development in the coordination chemistry of phenol containing ligands.2 The
synthetic analogue of the tyrosine radical is the phenoxyl radical, in which the phenol
groups have the potential ability to form one-electron oxidized phenoxyl radical
complexes. This has led bioinorganic chemists to design and synthesize transition metal
complexes of different phenol-containing ligands for mimicking the structural and/or
functional aspect of metalloenzymes. For example, in order to understand Galactose
oxidase, the coordination chemistry of transition metal ions with radical containing
Chapter 1 Introduction
Introduction 2
ligands such as phenoxyl, anilino and thiyls has been developed in our group. A large
number of transition metal complexes with O,O'-coordinated o-benzosemiquinonate(1-),
N,N'-coordinated o-diiminobenzosemiquinonate(1-), O,N-coordinated o-
iminobezoquinonate(1-), N,S-coordinated o-iminothioenebenzosemiquinonate(1-) and
S,S’-coordinated o-dithiobenzosemiquinonate(1-) π radical ligands have been synthesized
in recent years, characterized by various spectroscopic methods and studied
theoretically.5 The main focus of these studies is the correct description of the electronic
structure of species containing open shell organic ligands and paramagnetic metal ions. In
many cases, the complexes studied have been known since the 1960s, though
characterization at that time was often inadequate to assign unambiguously the proper
oxidation state of the metal. The reason for these discrepancies was the mistreatment of
the terms like formal and physical oxidation state. The formal and physical
(spectroscopic) oxidation states, which are both different concepts, need not always be
identical for a given coordination compound. The formal oxidation state denotes the
charge left on the metal after all ligands have been removed in their normal closed shell
configuration. The physical oxidation state is derived from a known dn configuration.6
Thus, discrepancies arise when an organic radical with an open shell electron
configuration is coordinated to a transition metal ion. At this point, the term non-innocent
ligand is more convenient and is used to emphasize the fact that some ligands do not
possess a closed-shell configuration. This means that these ligands can exist in different
oxidation states while coordinated to metal. It has been shown that these different
oxidation levels can be distinguished by using high quality X-ray crystallography
performed at cryogenic temperatures, and shown below are the significant bond distances
for different ligands. Thus, it is experimentally possible to distinguish between the two
electronic structures A and B by using high quality X-ray crystallography (scheme 1.1.1).
Scheme 1.1.1
X
Y
Mn+
X
Y
M(n-1)+
A B
Chapter 1 3
In general, The C-X/Y bond lengths vary systematically. In the N,S-
coordinated o-aminothiophenolato(1-) [(LNSAP)]1- ligand a C-N bond length of ~1.46 Å is
observed and a C-S bond length of ~1.76 Å. In o-imidothiophenolato(2-) [(LNSIP)]2-, C-N
and C-S bond distances of ~1.40 Å and ~1.75 Å, respectively are observed. The C-N and
C-S bond distances are intermediate between those of a single and double bond i.e. at
~1.36 Å and ~1.72 Å, respectively in the o-iminothiobenzosemiquinonato(1-) [(LNSISQ)]1-
π-radical ligands (scheme 1.1.2).7
Similar trends have been established for O,O-coordinated catecholate(2-)
[(LCat)]2-, benzosemiquinonate(1-) [(LSQ)]1- and benzoquinone [(LBQ)]0 (scheme 1.1.3)4 as
well as in the S,S-coordinated o-dithiolato (2-) [(LSS)]2- and o-dithiobezosemiquinonate
(1-) [(LSSSQ)]1- π-radical ligands (scheme 1.1.4).8
(Lcat)2- (LSQ)1- (LBq)0
Scheme 1.1.3: Redox activity of o-benzoquinone ligands.
Scheme 1.1.2: Redox activity of o-aminothiophenolate ligands.
Introduction 4
In addition to the changes in the C-X bond distances, X,Y-coordinated
(LSQ)1- radicals display a quinoid type distortion of the six-membered ring which is not
observed in closed shell analogues. This distortion involves two alternating short C-C
distances of 1.37 ± 0.01 Å and four longer ones of ~1.415 ± 0.01Å, whereas in the
closed-shell aromatic mono- and dianions, the six C-C bond lengths of 1.39 ± 0.01 Å are
equidistant.
1.2 Objective of this work
As it is possible to determine the true dn configuration of the central metal
ion and measure its physical oxidation state spectroscopically (UV-vis, EPR, X-ray
absorption near edge (XANE) spectroscopy) we decided to reinvestigate the coordination
chemistry of complexes with the above mentioned ligands. In many cases the ligands are
modified by adding tert-butyl substitutents in order to avoid the solubility problems often
encountered in compounds containing un-substituted ligands.
There are about 120 known structures of transition metal complexes
containing at least one N,S-coordinated o-aminothiophenolato derived moiety. Often, the
formal charge or the oxidation level of the moiety was not specified. It is only when
Scheme 1.1.4: Redox activity of o-dithiolele ligands.
Chapter 1 5
Wieghardt et al. found evidence for coordinated radical ligands that the non-innocent
nature of these species was contemplated. Recently the redox non-innocent nature of o-
aminothiophenolate ligands has been established in cobalt and nickel complexes.9
Therefore this work contains the synthesis and characterization of a square-planar cobalt
complex with o-aminothiophenolate, whose electronic structure can now be understood.
Also, in a series of N,S-coordinated nickel and cobalt complexes i.e. [Ni(ddbt)] and
[Co(ddbt)]10 a valence isomer structure was reported, where both forms as shown below
(Fig. 1.2.1) have equal weight. Therefore we resynthesized these complexes in order to
study the redox properties of ligand in the presence of different metal ions.
As compared to the huge number of bis(dithiolene) complexes reported in
the literature, the reports of tris(dithiolene) complexes are fewer (There are roughly 50
homoleptic tris(dithiolene) complexes
reported in the CSDC).11 The electronic
structure and oxidation level of ligands in
bis(dithiolene) complexes has been
explicitly verified for a number of
complexes with the aid of theoretical and
spectroscopic methods,8 however that in
the case of tris(dithiolene) complexes is
still not explicitly clear. The initial
structural report of Re[S2C2(C6H5)2]3,12
and shortly thereafter the reports of
Y
X
M
X
Y
X
YR1
R3
R2
R1
R3
R2
R1
R3
R2
Fig. 1.2.2: Metal tris-chelate complexes.
Fig. 1.2.1: Valence isomer structure suggested by Kushi et al.
N
S
N
S
H H
NiN
S
N
S
H H
Ni
R R R R
Introduction 6
[Mo(edt)3] and [V(S2C2Ph2)3] were the first six-coordinate complexes to exhibit near
trigonal prismatic geometries. Since these reports, the reasons for the preferential
formation of complexes with trigonal prismatic coordination geometry over octahedral
geometry has been discussed extensively13 and the elucidation of the electronic structure
of these species has become a matter of great interest. These are predominantly
complexes of the early transition metal elements, e.g. V, Mo and W. The main features of
these compounds were the assignment of d0 configuration to the central metal centers in
Cr, Mo and W complexes. In our view, as the d3 configuration was well established to the
tris-o-catecholato Cr compounds, the analogous compounds with o-dithiolene are
expected also to possess a +3 oxidation state.
Therefore we undertook the synthesis of tris (o-dithiolato) complexes with
Cr, Mo and W and their characterization is reported in chapters 5 and 6. A schematic
presentation of metallo tris complexes synthesized in this work is shown in Fig. 1.2.2 and
the ligands with their substitutions are displayed in table 1.2.1
Complex X Y R1 R2 R3
11 NH S t-butyl t-butyl H
8, 12, 12b, 13, 13b S S t-butyl t-butyl H
10, 10b O O t-butyl H t-butyl
Table 1.2.1: ligands with their substitutions used for metallo-tris complexes.
Chapter 1 7
1.3 characterization techniques
The spectroscopic methods employed in this work
cover 10 orders of magnitude in photon energy. Different energy
regions provide different and complementary information about
the nature of transition metal complexes. Fig. 1.3.1 illustrates the
various regions into which electromagnetic radiation has been
divided.14,15 The molecular processes associated with each region
are quite different. The descriptions of some of these
spectroscopic techniques are summarized below. Apart from the
spectroscopic techniques, electrochemistry is mainly used to
observe the redox processes of compounds under study.
1) Microwave region
Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR)
spectroscopy is a branch of spectroscopy in
which radiation of microwave frequency is
absorbed by molecules, ions, or atoms
possessing electrons with unpaired spins. In
EPR, different energy states arise from the
interaction of the unpaired electron spin
moment (given by ms = ± ½ for a free
electron) with the magnetic field (Zeeman
effect, Fig. 1.3.2). The Zeeman
Hamiltonian for the interaction of an
electron with the magnetic field is given by
Fig. 1.3.1: Regions of electromagnetic radiation.
Fig. 1.3.2: The removal of the degeneracyof the electron spin states by magneticfield, and resulting EPR spectrum.
Introduction 8
H = g β H Ŝz where g for a free electron has the value 2.0023193; β is the electron Bohr
magneton, Ŝz is the spin operator; and H is the applied field strength. For a free radical, g
remains close to the free-electron value. In chemical systems, the unpaired electron
occupies an orbital that may be localized on a single atom or may be heavily delocalized
across a molecule or radical. Thus, the g-value reflects the nature of this orbital. In our
systems free electron is often situated on the ligand orbitals, thus g values of very close to
uncoordinated free organic radical are observed. On the other hand, a metal centered free
electron is affected more by spin-orbit coupling and identified by deviation of g values
from free organic radical. An EPR spectrum may show additional fine structure when the
atom on which the unpaired spin is centered has a nuclear spin. In this respect EPR
spectroscopy plays a very important role in our systems to identify the environment of
unpaired electrons.
2) Infrared region
Molecular vibrations occur in the IR region of the spectrum. In order to be
infrared active, there must be a dipole change during the vibration and this change may
take place either along a symmetry axis or at right angles to this axis. A non-linear N-
atomic molecule can have 3N-6 different internal vibrations, if, on the other hand, the
molecule is linear, 3N-5 degrees of vibrational freedom are available. As frequencies are
highly characteristic of functional groups, they are widely used for the analysis of
particular groups. For example, S,S-coordinated o-dithiobezosemiquinonate(1-)
[(LSSSQ)]1- π-radical ligands show an IR stretch at ~ 1106 cm-1, which has proven very
important evidence for identification of radical ligands.
3) Near IR, Visible and UV region
Electronic transitions of molecules cover this region. Both the position and
intensity of the absorption due to an electronic transition are very characteristic of the
molecular group involved. The position of absorption is given at the point of maximum
absorption, λmax (nm). For practical reasons the electronic spectrum is divided into three
regions: (i) the visible region, between 400-750 nm (25,000-13,300 cm-1) (ii) The near
ultra-violet region, between 200-400 nm (50,000-25,000 cm-1) (iii) Near infrared region,
between 750-2000 nm (13,300-5,000 cm-1). Coordination compounds always show d-d
transitions of weak intensity, which are characteristic of involved metal ion. Other than
Chapter 1 9
these weakly allowed transitions, fully allowed transitions occur in strongly covalent
complex with the metal ion and the ligand having complementary redox properties. These
are known as charge-transfer (CT) bands. In our systems these CT bands are dominated
due to the redox non-innocent nature of ligands. The square-planar and octahedral
complexes containing π-radical ligand exhibit characteristic inter valence charge transfer
(IVCT), ligand to ligand charge transfer (LLCT) and ligand to metal charge transfer
bands (LMCT) bands. The intensity of an electronic absorption is given by the simple
equation: ε = A / c l, where c and l are the concentration and path length of the sample, A
is the absorbance and ε is the extinction coefficient.
4) X-ray region
a) X-ray crystallography
Using X-ray crystallography, one can determine the precise composition
and atomic arrangement of any crystalline substance. A single crystal is composed of
some repeating three-dimensional pattern of electron density. The internal arrangements
of the electrons in the crystal lattice determine the directions and intensities of X-ray
beams scattered from it. As shown in scheme 1.1.2, 1.1.3 and 1.1.4, X-ray
crystallography allows identifying the presence of π-radical ligands in coordinated
transition metal complexes due to distinctive features in bond distances of ligands.
b) X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS)
XAS probes core electronic energy levels and includes photo dissociation
from core energy levels. The spectrum can be divide into two regions. The edge and the
EXAFS regions. The analysis of the edge region (XANES), i. e. the position of the edge
and the assignment of peaks near the edge give information about oxidation states,
covalency (increasing ligand character of metal d orbitals), molecular symmetry of the
site, and coordination number. The EXAFS provides, local structural information about
the atomic neighborhood of the element being probed. The information consists of the
number of ligands, the identity of these ligand atoms, and precise radial distances. The X-
ray photon absorbed (hν) results in transitions within the atomic energy levels of the
absorbing atom. During the spectroscopic scan absorption occurs when the photon has an
energy equal to the ionization energy of the core electron. At lower X-ray energies, X-ray
induced ionisation of 2p or 2s electrons gives rise to what are called LIII, LII and LI
Introduction 10
absorption edges. At significantly higher energies, photoionization of 1s electrons gives
rise to the K edge. For a given element, K edge energies depend on the chemical
environment of the element. For example, higher oxidation state metals have higher
positive charge, making it slightly more difficult to photodissociate the 1s electron,
shifting the K edge to higher energy. Shifts of 1-2 eV per oxidation state are typical for
first row transition metals. For this reason, in o-dithiolene complexes S K-edge studies
have proven to be very significant for the identification of redox state of ligands.
5) Cyclic voltammetry (CV)
In this technique an "electrochemical spectrum" indicating the potentials at
which chemical processes occur can be rapidly obtained. In CV experiments the cell
current is recorded as a function of the applied potential. It involves sweeping the
electrode potential between limits E1 and E2 at a known scan rate. On reaching the
potential E2 the sweep is reversed and again reaches to the initial potential E1. The scan
rates used range from 50 mV/s up to 1000 mV/s. In the case of a reversible reaction as
described by equation 1.3.1, we assume that only O is initially present and when linear
potential sweep is applied, reduction takes place to produce R.
A reversible CV can only be observed if both O and R are stable and the
kinetics of the electron transfer processes are fast, so that at all potentials and potential
scan rates the electron transfer process on the surface is in equilibrium so that surface
concentrations follow the Nernst equation. For this reason this technique has proven very
important for the identification of radical ligands, which show typical reversible waves in
the CV. Along with CV, controlled potential coulometry is used to determine the overall
number of electrons involved in an electrode process. It is also used to prepare oxidation
and reduction products to enable them to be identified by EPR and electronic absorption
spectroscopy.
RneO ⇔−+ equation 1.3.1
Chapter 1 11
1.4 The ligands used in this work
1) o-aminothiophenol [LNS]
2) 2-phenylbenzothiazoline [LPh]
3) 2-mercapto-3,5-di-tert-butylaniline H2[tLNS]
4) 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-benzenedithiol H2[tLSS]
5) 3,6-di-tert-butylcatacholate H2[tLCat]
Complexes synthesized in this work are:
1) [As(Ph)4] [CoIII(LNS)2] (1)
2) [N(n-Bu)4] [CoIII(LNS)2] (2)
3) [CoIII(LNS)(LISQNS)] (2a)
NH2
SH
HN
S
Ph
H
NH2
SH
SH
SH
OH
OH
(1) H2[LNS] (2) H2[LPh] (3)H2[tLNS]
(4) H2[tLSS] (5) H2[tLCat]
Introduction 12
4) Na [Cr3(tLNS)3(OEt)3(µ-OMe)4(OHEt)4] (3)
5) Na [Cr3(tLNS)3(OMe)3(µ-OMe)4(OHMe)3] (4a)
6) Na [Cr3(tLNS)3(OMe)3(µ-OMe)4(OH2)3] (4b)
7) [Ni(Phbt)2] (5i)
8) [Ni(ddbt)] (5)
9) [Co(Cp)2] [Ni(ddbt)] (5b)
10) [Co(Phbt)2] (6i)
11) [Co(ddbt)] (6)
12) [Co(Cp)2] [Co(ddbt)] (6b)
13) [Zn(Phbt)2] (7)
14) [N(n-Bu)4] [Cr(tLSS)3] (8)
15) [N(n-Bu)4] [CrO(tLSS)2] (9)
16) [Cr(tLCat)3] (10)
17) [Co(Cp)2] [Cr(tLCat)3] (10b)
18) [Mo(tLNS)3] (11)
19) [Mo(tLSS)3] (12)
20) [N(n-Bu)4] [Mo(tLSS)3] (12b)
21) [W(tLSS)3] (13)
22) [N(n-Bu)4] [W(tLSS)3] (13b)
Chapter 1 13
1.5 References
1) (a) Stubbe, J. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1989, 58, 257. (b) Frey, P. A. Chem. Rev.
1990, 90, 1343. (c) Ochiai, E. -I. J. Chem. Ed. 1993, 70, 128. (d) Stubbe, J.; van
der Donk, W. A. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 705. (e) Holm, R. H.; Solomon, E. I. Guest
Editors, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 7.
2) (a) Bill, E.; Müller, J.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38,
5795. (b) Wang, Y.; Stack, T. D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 13097. (c)
Zurita, D.; Gautier-Luneau, I.; Menage, S.; Piere, J. L.; Saint-Aman, E. J. Biol.
Inorg. Chem. 1997, 2, 46. (d) Shimazaki, Y.; Huth, S.; Odani, A.; Yamauchi, O.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 112, 1666. (e) Halfen, J. A.; Jazdzewski, B. A.;
Mahapatra, S.; Berreau, L. M.; Wilkinson, E. C.; Que, L.; Tolman, W. B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8217.
3) Goldberg, D. P.; Lippard, S. J. Adv. Chem. Ser. 1995, 246, 59.
4) Pierpont C. G. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 216 and references therein.
5) (a) Bachler, V.; Olbrich, G.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41,
4179. (b) Herebian, D.; Wieghardt, K.; Neese, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
10997. (c) Herebian, D.; Bothe, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9116. (d) Sun, X.; Chun, H.; Hildenbrand, K.; Bothe, E.;
Weyhermüller, T.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 4295. (e)
Min, K. S.; Weyhermüller, T.; Bothe, E.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43,
2922.
6) Jörgensen, C. K. Oxidation Numbers and Oxidation States; Springer: Heidelberg,
Germany, 1969.
7) (a) Bothe, E.; Verani, C. N.; Weyhermüller, T.; Chaudhuri, P.; Wieghardt, K. J.
Inorg. Biochem. 2001, 86, 154. (b) Herebian, D.; Ghosh, P.; Chun, H.; Bothe, E.;
Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt K. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 8, 1957. (c)
Herebian, D.; Bothe, E.; Bill, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 10012. (d) Ghosh, P.; Bill, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Neese, F.;
Wieghardt, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1293. (e) Ghosh, P.; Bill, E.;
Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt, K., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3967. (f) Ghosh,
Introduction 14
P.; Begum, A.; Herebian, D.; Bothe, E.; Hildenbrand, K.; Weyhermüller, T.;
Wieghardt, K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 563.
8) (a) Ray, K.; Weyhermüller, T.; Goossens, A.; Crajé, M. W. J.; Wieghardt, K.
Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 4082. (b) Ray, K.; Bill, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5641. (c) Ray, K.; Begum, A.; Weyhermüller,
T.; Piligkos, S.; Slageren, J. V.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 4403.
9) Bill, E.; Bothe, E.; Chaudhuri, P.; Chlopek, C.; Herebian, D.; Kokatam, S.; Ray,
K.; Weyhermüller, T.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 204.
10) Kawamoto, T.; Kuma, H.; Kushi, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1997, 70, 1599.
11) Stiefel, E. I. editor, Progr. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 111.
12) Eisenberg, R.; Ibers, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 3776.
13) (a) Kepert, D. L. Inorganic stereochemistry; Inorganic chemistry concepts 6;
Spinger Verlag: Berlin, 1982, chapter 8. (b) Huheey, J. E.; Keiter, R. L. Inorganic
chemistry: principles of structure and reactivity, 4th ed.; Harper: New York, 1993,
Chapter 13. (c) Schrauzer, V. P.; Mayweg, V. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88,
3235. (d) Stiefel, E. I.; Eisenberg, R.; Rosenberg, R. C.; Gray, H. B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1966, 88, 2956.
14) Drago, R. S. Physical methods in chemistry, Saunders Company: New York,
1965.
15) Banwell, C. N. Fundamentals of molecular spectroscopy, McGraw-Hill: UK
1972.
Chapter 2 15
2.1 Introduction
Transition metals with a mixed nitrogen-sulfur coordination environment
are often encountered in the active sites of metalloenzymes. Some enzymes such as ATP
sulfurylase1 or nitrile hydratase2 possess a cobalt center, which has been
spectroscopically characterized. A great interest in these biological systems has been
developed and therefore the synthesis of new cobalt complexes containing mixed
nitrogen-sulfur coordination is also of interest.
The majority of CoIII complexes found in the literature have an octahedral
coordination sphere. Only a few square planar complexes are known which are typically
stabilized by four strongly σ-donating ligands. Examples of such monoanionic complexes
with strong donor ligands such as S,S'-dithiolato, 3 N-carboxamido-O-alkyloxo4 have been
reported and characterized. These complexes exist having a spin triplet ground state.
Additionally, complexes such as [Co(bdt)2][N(n-bu)4], [Co(tdt)2][N(n-bu)4] (bdt =
bis(1,2-benzenedithiolato)), (tdt = bis(3,4-toluenedithiolato))5 and [Co(3-Pr(bi))2] (3-
Pr(bi) = [HNCON(C3H7)CONH]2-)6 have been characterized by their magnetic
susceptibility, and a spin triplet ground state was also found. Well-characterized square
planar CoIII complexes having a mixed N2S2 ligand environment are rare: [CoIII(L)]Na,
(L= di-N-carboxamido-di-thiolato, a tetradentate ligand)7a and [CoIII(N2S2)]NEt3 (N2S2 =
Chapter 2 Cobalt complexes of
o-aminothiophenolate
Co complexes 16
N, N'-(2-thioacetyl-isobutyryl)-2-aminobenzylamine).7bRecently, it has been shown that
N,S-coordinated o-aminothiophenolate ligands are redox-non-innocent and they can
exists in four different oxidation and protonation states (Scheme 2.1.1).10
So far, the literature concerning cobalt complexes containing o-
aminothiophenolate ligands is full of ambiguities, which are mostly due to the air
sensitivity of these complexes and the redox non-innocent nature of the ligands. For
example, Livingstone8 reported the first cobalt complex with an o-aminothiophenolate
ligand in 1956 which was blue colored and formulated as [Co(abt)2] (I) (abt = o-
aminobenzenethiol(1-)) though the effective magnetic moment of 2.6 B.M at 294 K
leaves some ambiguity in its description as a low spin, square-planar cobalt (II).
Furthermore, Phillips et al.9 synthesized an orange-brown complex under anaerobic
conditions which has also been formulated as [Co(abt)2] (II) having an effective magnetic
moment of 4.2 B.M. at 292 K. Thus, even though both II and III have been assigned as
having the formula [Co(abt)2], they apparently have either different compositions or
different oxidation states of the metal or the ligands. The magnetic moment of II
decreases gradually as the temperature is lowered; at higher temperatures the Curie-
Weiss law is obeyed, but below 150 K, the reciprocal susceptibility vs. temperature plot
deviated from linearity. From the magnetic behavior of II, the structure was assigned as
an octahedral compound (with bridging sulfur) having antiferromagnetic interactions that
lead to a lowering of the magnetic moment as a function of temperature. Oxidation of
orange-brown II afforded a dark blue substance with an effective magnetic moment of
2.6 B.M. at 293 K, similar to what had been observed before by Livingstone et al. for the
blue complex II. Phillips et al.9 characterized this oxidized dark blue complex as having
the formula [Co(abt)2]OH (III) on account of its elemental analysis.
S
NH
S
NH
S
NH-e+e
-e+e
S
NH2- H+
+ H+
(LNSAP)1- (LNS
IP)2- (LNSISQ)1- (LNS
IBQ)0
Scheme. 2.1.1 Redox activity of o-aminothiophenolate, (abt) (LNS)
Chapter 2 17
With respect to this subject, an orange-brown complex similar to II with
the ligand 6-amino-2,4-di-tert-butylthiophenol [H2(tLNS)], was synthesized under strictly
anaerobic conditions.10 The magnetic moment data fitted well to a dimer model with
SCo=3/2 with g = 2.2, and J = -144cm-1. This result supports an assignment of the formula
of this complex as [CoII(tLNSAP)2]2 (IV). Oxidation of IV in air afforded a black dimeric
compound V, in which each monomeric subunit consists of a five coordinated CoII ion
and two o-iminothiobenzosemiquinonato (1-) π radicals with (S=1/2), weakly
antiferromagnetically coupling to cobalt yielding an ST=0 ground state (Fig.2.1.2).
The magnetic and spectroscopic properties of the orange-brown
compounds II and IV are very similar. This suggests that the compound II, which was
reported to be an octahedral complex, may in fact be a dimer with two CoII ions and four
aminothiophenolato (1-) ligands. Because of their unusual magnetic susceptibility data,
the blue complexes formulated as [CoII(abt)2] (I) and [CoII(abt)2]OH (III) are likely a
mixture of an orange-brown dimer [Co(abt)2]2 (II), and its oxidized blue species.
Besides these neutral complexes, Birkar et al. have reported a
monoanionic cobalt complex with an o-aminothiophenolate ligand i.e. [Co(abt)2][N(n-
bu)4] (VI) (abt = o-aminothiophenolate(2-)). Magnetic susceptibility measurements,
cyclic voltammetry and electronic spectroscopy show that the spin ground state of this
compound is S=1. It should be noted, however, that the neutral and monoanionic
Fig. 2.1.2 Schematic drawing of IV (left) and V(right)
O2, - 4e-
(IV) (V)
Co complexes 18
complexes have not been structurally characterized. All of these results inspired us to
carefully study these systems, in particular the monoanionic complex VI. Therefore VI
have been resynthesized so that it could be characterized by X-ray crystallography and
other spectroscopic techniques.
2.2 Synthesis of [As(Ph)4] [Co(LNSIP)2] (1) and [N(n-bu)4] [Co(LNS
IP)2] (2)
Complexes [As(Ph)4] [Co(LNSIP)2] (1) and [N(n-bu)4][Co(LNS
IP)2] (2) were
synthesized as blue precipitates described by Birker et al.11 To an ethanolic solution of
potassium, the ligand o-aminothiophenol, [H2(LNS)], was added followed by the addition
of CoCl2.6H2O, and [As(Ph)4]Cl respectively. A flow of air was passed for 15 minutes
yielding a blue precipitate of 1, which was isolated by filtration. Compound 2 was
obtained in a similar fashion by adding [N(n-bu)4]+ as a countercation instead of
[As(Ph)4]+. Crystals suitable for X-ray structure analysis were obtained from a mixture
of MeCN and MeOH for both of the complexes. The Infrared spectra of 1 and 2 show a
N-H stretching band at 3238 cm-1. The absence of bands around 1600 cm-1 excludes the
possibility of C=N bond suggesting single bond character for the C-N bond.
2.3 Molecular structures of 1 and 2
The crystal structures of both of the compounds 1 and 2 at 100(2) K have
been determined by X-ray crystallography using Mo Kα radiation. Fig. 2.3.1 and Fig.
2.3.2 show thermal ellipsoid plots of anions in 1 and 2, respectively and table 2.3.1 and
2.3.2 summarize relevant bond lengths.
The complex 1 crystallizes in the tetragonal space group P41. The
geometry of the cobalt center is square planar. Two isomers, cis (20%) and trans (80%)
with respect to the (N, S)- ligand coordination were found disordered in the asymmetric
unit and there is a significant distortion from square-planar geometry (dihedral angle
between N-Co-S planes equal to 5.4º). In the unit cell, the anions are well separated with
an average intermolecular Co....Co distance of 9.916(8) Å and a Co....As distance of
5.678(6) Å. The Co(1)-N(2) distance of 1.873(4) Å is similar to that observed previously
in the structure of compounds [CoIII(L)]Na : (1.872(7) Å) (L= di-N-carboxamido-di-
thiolate)7a and [CoIII(N2S2)]NEt3 : (1.882 (4) Å) (N2S2 = N, N'-(2-thioacetyl-isobutyryl)-2-
Chapter 2 19
aminobenzylamine).7b However, the Co(1)─S(1) distance of 2.176 (1) Å is longer than
the average Co-S distance in [CoIII(N2S2)] (2.134 (2) Å) but similar to that in [CoIII(tdt)2]
(2.167(4) Å) (tdt = bis(3,4-toluenedithiolate)).5 X-ray crystallography is a powerful tool
for differentiating the different oxidized forms of the ligand [H2(LNS)] since the average
C-S and C-N bond lengths are significantly different for the different oxidation states of
the ligand (Scheme 1.1, chapter 1). In the 1, the C(1)-S(1) distances of 1.750(2), and
C(6)-N(2) distance of 1.377(2) Å, are in the single bond range. The six C-C distances of
the phenyl rings are also equidistant within the experimental error (1.398 ± 0.02; 3σ). The
average C-C distances of 1.393(3) Å are typical for aromatic phenyl rings. Both of the
features mentioned above suggest the presence of the dianionic o-iminobenzothiolato
form of both ligands and thus the formal oxidation state for the cobalt centre is +III (d6,
S=1). To reinforce this interpretation, compound 2 was synthesized using [N(n-bu)4]+ as a
countercation .
Bond distance [Å] Co(1)-N(2) S(1)-C(1) C(1)-C(2) C(2)-C(3) C(3)-C(4)
1.873(4) 1.750(4) 1.426(5) 1.384(6) 1.397(8)
Co(1)-S(1) N(2)-C(6) C(1)-C(6) C(4)-C(5) C(5)-C(6)
2.176(1) 1.377(6) 1.402(6) 1.376(7) 1.404(6)
Fig 2.3.1: Thermal ellipsoid drawing of the anion in 1 at the 50%
probability level, and disorder of the ligand with labelling scheme.
Co (1)
S(11)
S(1)
C(1)C(2)
C(6)
C(5)
C(4)
C(3)
N(2)
N(12)
S(11X)
N(12X)
Table 2.3.1: Selected bond distances in [Å] for 1.
Co complexes 20
Compound 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system in the space group P21/n. In
contrast with 1, in 2, the coordination geometry of the central cobalt atom is perfectly
square-planar, having a dihedral angle between N-Co-S planes equal to 1°. The central
Co ion is coordinated to two nitrogen and two sulfur atoms of both the ligands [H2(LNS)],
in the trans geometry. Two ligands in the molecule are crystallographically identical. The
anions are well separated in the unit cell with average intermolecular Co...Co distances of
6.818(6) Å, and inter-ligand S...S and N...N distances of 4.596(5) and 4.959(7) Å,
respectively. The average Co-N distance (1.845(1) Å) is similar to that observed in 1, and
consistent with those distances in neutral [CoIII(2LN)2] (LN = o-phenylenediamine), and
anionic [CoIII(4LO)2][Co(Cp)2] (LO=2-(2-trifluromethyl)anilino-4,6-di-tert-butylphenol)
complexes.13 In addition, the average Co─S distance (2.1868(4) Å) is similar to the
distances in other sulfur containing cobalt (III) complexes.3d, 5, 7 The C-S (1.7559 ± 0.04
Å) and C-N (1.373± 0.06 Å) average bond distances display single bond character and
the six C-C bonds of the six-membered ring are nearly equidistant within the 3σ error
(1.396± 0.06 Å). These features confirm that the ligands are dianions and that the central
cobalt ion possesses a +3 oxidation state in 8. It is important to note that the ligand
dimensions in 1 and 2 are identical to those observed for the diamagnetic, square-planar
compound [PtII(bpy)(tLNSIP)] . 16
Fig 2.3.2: Thermal ellipsoid plot of 2 with labelling scheme and ellipsoids drawn atthe 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted except aminoprotons.
Co (1)
S(1)
C(1)C(2)
C(6)C(5)C(4)
C(3)
N(1)
Chapter 2 21
2.4 Electrochemistry
The complexes 1 and 2 have been studied by cyclic-voltammetry (CV) in
CH2Cl2 containing 0.10 M [N-(n-bu)4]PF6 as supporting electrolyte. Ferrocene was used
as an internal standard, and all redox potentials were referenced versus the
ferrocenium/ferrocene (Fc+/Fc) couple at room temperature.
The cyclic-voltammograms of 1 and 2 are identical and for simplification
only the one corresponding to 1 is shown in Fig. 2.4.1 (a range of 0.0 to –2.0 V was
used). Two redox processes were observed at E1/2= -0.61V (oxidation) and at E1/2 = -
Bond distance [Å] Co(1)-N(1) Co(1)-S(1) N(2)-C(2) S(1)-C(1)
1.840(1) 2.187(4) 1.371(2) 1.759(2)
C(1)-C(6) C(1)-C(2) C(2)-C(3) C(3)-C(4) C(4)-C(5) C(5)-C(6)
1.393(2) 1.413(2) 1.406(2) 1.385(2) 1.392(3) 1.390(3)
Table 2.3.2: Selected bond distances in [Å] for 2
Fig. 2.4.1: Cyclic voltammograms of 1 at 25 ºC in CH2Cl2 solution containing 0.10M[(n-bu)4N][PF6], using a glassy carbon working electrode with scan rates of 25, 50, 100,200, 400, 800 mV/s.
-2.0-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2-1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2
E (V)
5µA
Co complexes 22
1.730V (reduction). The oxidation process was found to be reversible over the scan rates
of 25-800 mV/s, however the reduction process was irreversible over the scan rates of 25-
400 mV/s only showing a return wave at the higher scan rate of 800 mV/s. Therefore
controlled potential coulometry was attempted only for the oxidation process. As it is
unlikely that the ligand can be further reduced, the reduction wave is assigned as a metal
centered reduction to CoII. Coulometric oxidation at -5°C and -0.3 V was performed and
the amount of charge passed corresponded to a 1e- oxidation process. The electronic
spectrum (Fig. 2.5.1) recorded after coulometric oxidation (species 1a) was very different
from that of 1. However, on completion of the coulometric oxidation, the cyclic
voltammogram has the current intensities lower than the starting one (Fig. 2.4.2). This
was attributed to the instability of the 1a in CH2Cl2 during the time of the coulometry
leading to some other chemical process. At first glance, we expected that the oxidation
should form an S=1/2 species and that could be recognized by epr; however, 1a was epr
silent. This suggests dimer formation of the oxidized species, which may also explain the
non-reproducibility of cyclic voltammogram after the oxidation process.
Fig. 2.4.2: Cyclic voltammograms of 1 at -25ºC in CH2Cl2 solutioncontaining 0.10M [(n-bu)4N][PF6], using a glassy carbon workingelectrode.
-2.0-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2-1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2
After oxidation before oxidation
E (V)
5µA
Chapter 2 23
Chemical oxidation of 2 was achieved using 1 equivalent of Fc(PF6) in
CH2Cl2 to give transient species 2a. The electronic spectrum of 2a shows a wide band in
the near infrared region between 1600-1200 nm, which was absent in the spectrum of 1a
(Fig.2.5.1). When 2a was exposed to air for few minutes at room temperature, it changes
its color from green to brown giving a electronic spectrum similar to that of 1a. This
again indicates that both the electrochemically-oxidized species, and chemically oxidised
species 2a, were short-lived, and during the time of the coulometry, it is not stable as a
monomer, having a tendency to dimerise (1a). Based on the observations above, the
redox activity of complexes 1 and 82 can be best described as shown in scheme 2.4.1,
where the monoanionic species is formulated as [CoIII(LNSIP)2]1-.
DFT calculations on the spin triplet [Co(1LN)2]1- have shown that the
HOMO is a 2b2g orbital, which has almost equal contributions from the metal and the
ligand (Fig. 2.4.2) and thus, the explicit assignment of electron configuration at the metal
ion (i.e. to determine the dn (n = 6 or 7)) is not possible.13 But in contrast to this situation,
the geometry of the ligands in [Co(LNSIP)2]1- as determined by X-ray crystallography for
compounds 1 and 2 clearly suggest a CoIII (d6, S=1) spectroscopic oxidation state over a
[CoII(LNSISQ)(LNS
IP)] mixed-valence configuration.
Scheme 2.4.1: Redox activities of complexes 1 and 2
[CoIII(LNSIP)2] -e
+e[CoIII(LNS
ISQ)(LNSIP)]-e
+e[CoII(LNS
IP)2]2
[CoIII(LNSISQ)(LNS
IP)]2
FcPF6-e
[CoIII(LNSISQ)(LNS
IP)]Unstable
Unstable(S=1) (S=1/2)
(S=1/2) (S=0)
fast
slow
(2a) (1a)
Co complexes 24
Fig. 2.4.2: MO scheme of
[Co(1LN)2]1-
Chapter 2 25
2.5 Electronic absorption spectra
The electronic absorption spectrum of compound 1 shows absorption
maxima at 666 nm (ε ≈ 1.25 × 104 M-1 cm-1), 569 nm (ε ≈ 2 × 104 M-1 cm-1), and at 380
nm (ε ≈ 1 × 104 M-1 cm-1). Because of their high absorption coefficients these bands may
be assigned as charge transfer bands. The spectrum
of 1 is similar to the compound [CoIII(LBu)2]1-, in
which the assignment of the physical oxidation state
to the cobalt center has been shown by spectroscopy
and theory to be CoIII.3d Moreover, 1 does not
present any band in the near infrared region, typical
for an intervalence charge transfer band as the one
found in the spectra of [AuIII(LBu)(LBu●)] 17, in
which one of the ligands is a radical ligand and the
other one is dianionic. This confirms the
[CoIII(LNSIP)2]1- assignment for the complex. The
molecular orbital scheme of [CoIII(LBu)2]1-,3d
obtained from the DFT calculations (Fig. 2.5.2),
have shown that the CoIII intermediate spin (d6)
central metal ion contains two singly occupied dxz
and dyz orbitals and one vacant d orbital (dxy). The
vacant dxy orbital was placed very high in energy in
the case of D2h symmetry; therefore the high-energy
band at 380 nm may be assigned as the LMCT to
this orbital.
The chemically oxidized species 2a, shows a broad absorption band in the near IR region
(1180 nm, ε ≈ 2 × 103 M-1 cm-1), which does not appear in the spectrum of the
electrochemically-oxidized species (1a, presumably a dimer). Due to its high intensity,
this band is not likely an electric-dipole-forbidden d-d transition, but may be a spin
allowed ligand-to-ligand intervalence charge transfer band (LLIVCT). Several square-
planar complexes of Ni, Pd, and Pt with one o-iminothionebenzosemiquinonate (1-)
S
S
S
SM X
Y
2b2g
1ag (dx2
-y2)
2ag(dz2)
1b3g
1au
1b2g
1b1u
2b3g(dyz)
1b1g (dxy)
Fig. 2.5.2: Mo scheme of
[CoIII(LBu)2]1-
Co complexes 26
radical ligand exhibit similar bands in the near infrared region.18 This suggests the
presence of a (LNSISQ) ligand radical in the 2a, denoting ligand-centered oxidation.
2.6 X-band EPR
The X-band EPR spectrum of 2a, in frozen CH2Cl2 at 8.5 K is shown in
Fig. 2.6.1. The spectrum indicates an S=1/2 signal with an eight-line hyperfine splitting
due to the coupling of the 59Co (I=7/2) nucleus to the unpaired spin. The following
parameters have been obtained from a simulation: gx = 2.002, gy = 2.0071, gz = 2.01, and
A (59Co): (Ax = 124, AZ = 49.17) * 10-4 cm-1. The spectrum shows slight anisotropy,
which is commonly observed for delocalized organic radicals. The observed g values in
the spectrum are very close to the free electron value but the hyperfine-coupling constant
for 59Co nucleus is very strong compared to reported values for CoIII low spin octahedral
Fig. 2.5.1: Electronic absorption spectra of 1, 1a and 2a in CH2Cl2 at –50 C.
400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 16000.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
ε X
104 c
m-1
M-1
wavelength (nm)
1
2a
1a
Chapter 2 27
complexes containing a single ligand radical.14 Thus there are two ways to explain the
observed simulation parameters. In one case it is possible that, CoIII (d6, S=1)
antiferromagnetically couples with the unpaired electron from a radical ligand to give
SCo=1/2, which can explain the eight line hyperfine splitting with large hyperfine splitting
parameter. On the other hand, this spectrum is very similar to what observed for the
oxidized species of [Co(LBu)2]-, for which theoretical studies have suggested the presence
of a hydrated octahedral [CoIII(LBu)(LBu●)(H2O)2] species in solution.3d Thus during the
oxidation of complex 1, it is possible that water molecules from the solvent can occupy
the 5th and the 6th coordination sites of the cobalt, modifying its geometry from square
planar to octahedral and therefore changing the spin state of the CoIII center from
intermediate spin to low spin. Such coordination by water molecules during oxidation is
also observed in the oxidation of square planar [CoIII(LNO(ISQ))(LNO)] in CH2Cl2 solution,
which results in the formation of [CoII(LNO(IBQ))2(H2O)2]2+, (LNO represents o-
aminophenolato (2-) ligand, LNO(ISQ) represents o-iminobenzosemiquinonato (1-) ligand
and LNO(IBQ) represents o-iminobenzoquinonato(0) ligand).15 This result suggests that,
during the oxidation of complex 7, the species [CoIII(LIPNS)(LAP
NS)(H2O)2] may be
formed in solution which would explain the observed anisotropic g values (near to free
electron) in the EPR spectrum of 2a.
300 320 340 360 380
dχ"/d
B
B [mT]
Simulated
Experimental
Fig. 2.6.1: X-band epr spectrum of 2a. Exp: T = 8.5K, freq = 9.63GHz, power = 0.10mw.
Co complexes 28
2.7 Magnetic susceptibility
Magnetic susceptibility data of 1 and 2 were collected in the temperature
ranges 2 to 290 K in an applied magnetic field of 1T and are similar; only the data for 2 is
shown in the Fig. 2.7.1. Above T=50 K the complex shows a temperature independent
µeff value of 2.90 µB, indicating the presence of two unpaired electrons (ST=1) in the
complex. However, at temperatures lower than 50 K the µeff value decreases
monotonically with a decrease of the temperature reaching a value of 0.8 µB at 2 K. As
the intermolecular Co....Co and Co....S distances in the crystals of 2 are found to be too
long for any kind of exchange coupling interactions, this magnetic behavior may be
explained by a large zero field splitting value. This results in the splitting of the S=1
ground state into Ms = 0 and Ms= ±1 levels, leading to an increased population of the Ms
= 0 level at lower temperatures (Fig.2.7.4). The experimental magnetic susceptibility data
were simulated with a D (zero field splitting) value of ⏐47⏐cm-1 and a g value of 2.153
which are in agreement with similar results found for [Co(LBu)2]-, and [Co(LMe)2]1-
(g=2.17; D = 34 cm-1). 5
Fig. 2.7.1: Plot µeff vs. T for 1. The solid line represents the best least squares fitting for the experimental data (squares).
0 50 100 150 200 250
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
g = 2.153 D = 47.11 cm-1
TIP =0.417E-03 emu/mol
µ eff /
µB
T/K
Chapter 2 29
The sign of D was determined from variable field/ variable temperature
measurements and spin Hamiltonian simulations of the experimental data (Fig. 2.7.2).
The best fit for the magnetization behaviour is obtained for D = +41.2 cm-1 (fixed; from
far-infrared measurements), g = 2.003.
Far-infrared experiments have been reported for [(n-Bu4N)][Co(L)2] and
[(n-Bu4N)][Co(LMe)2] 5 to determine the zero field splitting parameters of the complexes
spectroscopically. A band at 34 cm-1 is observed in each case and is assigned to the intra-
triplet transition between the Ms = 0 and Ms = ± 1 components of the triplet ground state,
on the basis of the temperature dependence of the band. A far-infrared transmission
spectrum for 8 was measured over the frequency range of 10-50 cm-1. The measurements
were performed at variable fields in order to distinguish the electronic transition bands
from the normal phonon bands. The temperature was kept constant at 1.8 K and the field
was varied from 0 to 7 T. A very sharp band (1cm-1 width) is observed at 41 cm-1, the
position of which is found to be field dependent. Whereas all other bands remain
Figure 2.7.2: Magnetization measurements at 1, 4 and 7 T for 1. The solid lines represent the simulation. (D = +41.2 cm-1, g = 2.003).
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
MM
OL / N
gβ
βH/kT
1 T
4 T
7 T
Co complexes 30
unaffected on application of the magnetic field, the band at 41 cm-1 moves to lower
frequency with increasing field strength (Fig. 2.7.3), and hence, clearly arises from a low-
frequency electronic transition. The field dependence of the band may be accounted for
by the following: In axial symmetry, when the magnetic field and principal molecular
axis (z) and parallel, the effect of zero field splitting on the S=1 electron states is as
shown in Fig. 2.7.4 (a), where the Zeeman splitting of Ms = ± 1 states is of the magnitude
of ~10cm-1. However, when the magnetic field is perpendicular to the principle axis (z),
the Zeeman interaction is very weak (~1cm-1) (Fig. 2.7.4 (b)). In a solid sample there will
be very few molecules with principle axis parallel to field, and far more perpendicular.
The result is a weakening of the Zeeman interaction, and consequently a shift of ~1 cm-1
of the band at 41 cm-1 to the lower frequency.
The D value obtained from the susceptibility measurements is in
agreement with the zero field splitting parameter obtained from the far-infrared spectrum.
Thus, 1 and 2 possess a spin triplet ground state and a zero field splitting of +41 cm-1
lifts the degeneracy of the ground state.
Figure 2.7.3: Far-infrared transmission spectrum of 2 at 1.8 K and at fields varied between 0 and 7 T.
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 501E-3
0.01
0.1
1
Tr.
frequency (cm-1)
40.0 40.5 41.0 41.5 42.0 42.5 43.0
0 T 1 T 2 T 3 T 4 T 5 T 6 T 7 T
Chapter 2 31
Fig. 2.7.4 Splitting of S=1 in magnetic field with zero field splitting, (a) Magnetic field is parallel to molecular axis.
(b) Magnetic field is perpendicular to molecular axis.
H increasing
0
H increasing
0
ms= 0
ms= +1
ms= -1
ms= 0
ms= ±1
D D
10 cm-11 cm-1
(a) (b)
Co complexes 32
2.8 Conclusions
The complexes 1 and 2 have been fully characterized structurally,
electrochemically and also by magnetic measurements in order to show that these species
contain a central CoIII (d6, S=1) metal ion. The cyclic voltammograms of 1 and 2 show
reversible one-electron waves corresponding to oxidation of a ligand and irreversible
waves corresponding to one electron reduction of the cobalt. The absorption spectra of
the complexes contain intense LMCTs occurring in the visible region (< 700 nm). The
ground state of the complexes has been shown to be a spin triplet, in which the
degeneracy is lifted by large positive zero field splitting. A zero field splitting (+41 cm-1)
for complex 2 has been measured independently by magnetic moment measurement,
variable-temperature and variable field and SQUID magnetometry, and far-infrared
absorption. These studies have clarified the ambiguity for the proper formalism of the
monoanionic cobalt complex VI, and therefore it is possible to assign this complex
properly as [CoIII(LNSIP)2]1-. As was pointed out in the introduction, compounds I, and III
were likely not pure, i.e. they were most probably mixtures of monoanion 2 (S=1) and the
neutral dimer 1a (S=0). This altogether led to the observed magnetic moment of 2.6
B.M., which is less than a value of 2.73 B.M. expected for S=1. And therefore the
assignment of the oxidation state to the cobalt as +2 was likely in error.
Chapter 2 33
2.9 References
1) Gavel, O. Y.; Bursakov, S.A.; Calvete, J. J.; George, J. J.; Moura, G; Moura, I.
Biochemistry 1998, 37, 16225.
2) Kobayashi, M.; Shimizu, S. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999, 261, 1.
3) (a) Eisenberg, R.; Dori, Z.; Gray, H. B.; Ibers, J. A. Inorg. Chem. 1968, 7, 741 (b)
Fikar, R.; Koch, S. A.; Miller, M. M. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 1985. (c) Mrkvova,
K.; Kamenicek, J.; Sindelar, Z.; Kvitek, L. Trans. Metal Chem. 2004, 29, 238. (d)
Ray, K.; Begum, A.; Weyhermüller, T.; Piligkos, S.; Slageren, J. V.; Neese, F.;
Wieghardt, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4403.
4) Collins, T. J.; Richmond, T. G.; Santarsiero, B. D.; Treco, B. G. R. T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 2088.
5) van der Put, P. J.; Schilperoord, A. A. Inorg. Chem. 1974, 13, 2476.
6) Birker, P. J. M. W. L.; Bour, J. J.; Steggerda, J. J. Inorg. Chem. 1973, 12, 1254.
7) (a) Heirich, L.; Li, Y.; Provost, K.; Michalowicz, A.; Vaissermann, J.; Chottard, J.
C. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2001, 318, 117. (b) Chatel, S.; Rat, M.; Dijols, S.; Leduc,
P.; Tuchagues, J. P.; Mansuy, D.; Artaud, I. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2000, 80, 239.
8) Livingstone, S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 1042.
9) Larkworthy, L. F.; Murphy, J. M.; Phillips, D. J. Inorg. Chem. 1968, 7, 1436.
10) Herebian, D.; Ghosh, P.; Chun, H.; Bothe, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt, K.
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 1957.
11) Birker, P. J. M. W. L.; De Boer, E. A.; Bour, J. J. J. Coord. Chem. 1973, 3, 175.
12) Forbes, C. E.; Gold, A.; Holm, R. H. Inorg. Chem. 1971, 11, 2479.
13) Bill, E.; Bothe, E.; Chaudhuri, P.; Chlopek, C.; Herebian, D.; Kokatam, S.; Ray,
K.; Weyhermüller, T.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 204.
14) (a) Jung, O. S.; Pierpont, C. G. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 2227. (b) Adams, D. M.;
Noodelman, L.; Hendrickson, D. N. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 3966. (c) Min, K. S.;
Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt, K. Dalton Trans. 2003, 6, 1126. (d) Dutta, S. K.;
Beckmann, U.; Bill, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39,
3355.
15) Kokatam, S.; Wieghardt, K. Unpublished results.
Co complexes 34
16) Ghosh, P.; Begum, A.; Herebian, D.; Bothe, E.; Hildenbrand, K.; Weyhermüller,
T.; Wieghardt, K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 563.
17) Ray, K., Weyhermüller, T.; Goossens, A.; Craje, M. W. J.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg.
Chem. 2003, 42, 4082.
18) Herebian, D.; Bothe, E.; Bill, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 10012.
Chapter 3 35
3.1 Introduction
The reactivity of CrIII with ligands containing sulfur donor atoms (soft
bases) has not been as extensively studied as the coordination with nitrogen and oxygen
donor ligands (hard bases). A small number of CrIII complexes have been reported in the
literature with N,S- coordination: the neutral complex with N,N'-diphenylthiourea;
Cr[SC(NPh)(NHPh)]3,1 [(en)Cr(SCH2CH2NH2)2]ClO4 2 where, en = ehtylenediamine and
both neutral [Cr(SCN3H4)3] and ionic [Cr(SCN3H5)3]Cl3·3H2O complexes with
thiosemicarbazide.3
With the exception of work of Phillips et al., 4 in which the synthesis of an
impure and insoluble (in most organic solvents) [Cr(abt)2] (abt=aminothiophenolato(2-))
complex has been described, there is hardly any account on chromium complexes
coordinated to o-aminothiophenolate or derivatives forming either square planar or
octahedral complexes. Therefore, we decided to synthesize CrIII complexes with the 2-
mercapto-3,5-di-tert-butyl-aniline ligand (H2[tLNS]). However, the reaction of CrIICl2
with 3 equivalents of (H2[tLNS]) in different solvents resulted at each attempt, in the
formation of cuboidal compounds, Na[CrIII3(LISQ)3(µ-OMe)4(OEt)3(OHEt)3] (3),
Chapter 3 Cuboidal complexes of
chromium with 2-mercapto-3,5-di-tert-
butylaniline
Cuboidal Cr complexes 36
Na[CrIII3(LISQ)3(µ-OMe)4(OMe)3(OHMe)3] (4a) and Na[CrIII
3(LISQ)3(µ-
OMe)4(OMe)3(OH2)3] (4b). Even though these results were unexpected, cuboidal
clusters have generally been of a great interest, especially concerning their magnetic
properties. Oligo- and polynuclear group 6 transition-metal alkoxides have been the
subject of intensive study as they provide versatile substrates to mimic processes which
are relevant for both homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis.5 Hence, over the years a
number of oligo- and polynuclear CrIII clusters with, O2-, 6-9 OH2,9 RCO2-,10-12 HO-,10,14
CO, 14,15, RO- 16 bridging ligands have been reported. In this chapter, the structural,
electrochemical and magnetic properties of the above-mentioned CrIII cuboidal
complexes have been characterized to provide an insight into the properties of these
compounds.
3.2 Synthesis and characterization
Na[CrIII3(LISQ)3(µ-OMe)4(OEt)3(OHEt)3] (3)
Complex 3 was synthesized by reaction of CrIICl2 and Na2[tLNS], in
MeOH under anaerobic conditions. The color of the reaction mixture turned from
yellow-brown to light blue in 1 h. A flow of air was then allowed to pass through the
mixture for 2 minutes and as a consequence, the color of the reaction changed to dark
brown. A brown solid obtained by evaporation of solvent was dissolved in a mixture of
EtOH/ Ether(1:1), from which green crystals of compound 3 suitable for X-ray crystal
analysis were obtained by slow evaporation of solvents. The infrared spectrum of this
complex shows O-H stretching peak (from coordinated MeOH) at 3283 cm-1,
characteristic of the presence of bonded OH groups rather that free OH groups and the
C-O stretching at 1079 cm-1, authenticates the presence of methoxy groups.
Chapter 3 37
Na[CrIII3(LISQ)3(µ-OMe)4(OMe)3(OHMe)3] (4a)
Na[CrIII3(LISQ)3(µ-OMe)4(OMe)3(OH2)3] (4b)
Compound 4 was synthesized in similar fashion as 3, but MeOH was
used instead of EtOH as a solvent of crystallization. Crystals suitable for X-ray structure
analysis of compound 4, were obtained by slow evaporation of mixture of MeOH/DCM.
3.3 Molecular structures of 3 and 4
The crystal structures of compounds 3 and 4 at 100(2) K have been
determined using Mo Kα radiation.
The structure of compound 3 is presented in Fig. 3.3.1, and tables 3.3.1
and 3.3.2 summarize the bond angles and bond lengths, respectively. The 3 crystallizes
in the trigonal crystal system in a space group R3c. It contains three Cr atoms positioned
at the vertices of an equilateral triangle and connected by a triply bridging µ3-methoxide
and three µ2-methoxide ligands shaping a cuboidal structure. Each chromium ion has a
distorted octahedral coordination geometry, three of the coordination sites being
occupied by oxygen atoms of bridging methoxide ligands with Cr-O distances of
2.005(4) Å. The nitrogen and sulfur atoms of the tLNS ligand (Cr-N; 1.959(6) Å, Cr-S;
(2.345(2) Å) and one oxygen atom from terminal monodentate ethoxide group (Cr-O;
1.905(4) Å) occupy the rest of the coordination sites of the chromium. The resulting
mononegative Cr3III(LNS
ISQ)3(µ-OMe)4(OEt)3 moiety is coordinated to Na ion through
the oxygens of µ2-OCH3 groups. There is a C3 axis passing through the Na ion and
through O(21). The Na ion is coordinated to three EtOH groups (Na-O(21); 2.289(6)).
There is a hydrogen-bonding interaction (2.643(5) Å, 150.79 (1)°) between the hydrogen
atom from EtOH group (coordinated to Na), and an O(31) from a terminal OEt group.
The bond angles O-Cr-S and N-Cr-O vary from 165.8(2) to 175.26(14)°, showing
significant distortion from octahedral geometry at the Cr centers. The average Cr-O-Cr
and O-Cr-O bond angles in the Cr3O4 core are 107.3(4) and 90.4(5)°, indicating also
distortions from cubic geometry.
Cuboidal Cr complexes 38
Bond angles (deg) Cr(1)# 2-O(25)-Cr(1) 98.2(2) Cr(1)#2-O(25)-Cr(1) 105.4(2) Cr(1)-O(25)-Na(40) 109.2(4) N(2)-Cr(1)-O(25)#1 166.1(2) O(25)#1-Cr(1)-O(25) 90.4(3) O(25)-Cr(1)-O(21) 78.0(2) O(25)-Cr(1)-S(1) 175.2(1) O(31)-Cr(1)-O(21) 165.8(2)
Bond distances [Å] Cr(1)-O(31) 1.905(4) C(1)-C(2) 1.433(10) Cr(1)-O(25) 2.005(4) C(1)-C(6) 1.401(9) Cr(1)-O(21) 2.107(4) C(2)-C(3) 1.405(9) Cr(1)-N(2) 1.959(6) C(3)-C(4) 1.352(10) Cr(1)-S(1) 2.345(2) C(4)-C(5) 1.450(12) S(1)-C(1) 1.741(7) C(5)-C(6) 1.373(10) N(2)-C(2) 1.364(8)
Table 3.3.2: Selected bond distances [Å] for 3
Table 3.3.1: Selected bond angles in deg. for 3
Chapter 3 39
The Cr....Cr distances among the three metallic centers are similar within
the experimental error. This Cr....Cr average distance of 3.185 ± 0.01 Å is longer than the
typical range of Cr-Cr single bonds (2.67-2.97 Å), 6,15,17 and therefore is consistent with a
nonbonding M....M distance (~3.241(1) Å) observed in polynuclear carbonyl
complexes.18, 19 This, along with the paramagnetism of the complexes indicates the
absence of direct Cr-Cr bonding. The Cr(1)-O(25) distance of 2.005(4) Å is intermediate
between the one observed in the oxo bridged [(η-C5R5)Cr(µ3-O)4] 7(1.941(6) Å) cluster
and the one observed in methoxy bridged [Cr4(CO)12(µ3-OCH3)4]6 (2.114(6) Å) cluster.
The Cr-N and Cr-S average distances of 1.939(6) and 2.345(2) Å are similar with the
previously reported distances in CrIII complexes.1,2,13,20-21
C (5 )
C r(1 )
N (2 )
S (1 )
C (1 )
C (2 )
C (6 )
C (3 ) C (4 )
O (2 5 )O (3 1 )
H (4 1 )O (2 1 ) N a (4 0
)
Fig. 3.3.1: Ball and stick diagram and atom labeling scheme for 3.
Cuboidal Cr complexes 40
In the ligand tLNS, the C-S (1.737 ± 0.02 Å) and C-N (1.351 ± 0.02 Å)
bond distances display significant double bond character, and the six-membered rings
exhibit distortions typical of a quinoid type structure, namely two shorter C=C and four
longer ones (1.362 ± 0.03 and 1.422 ± 0.03Å) (Scheme 1.1, chapter 1). These features are
characteristic of N,S-coordinated o-iminothiobezosemiquinonate (1-) π–radical ligands
and have been systematically illustrated in the series of square planar transition metal
complexes of Ni, Pd, Pt, Co and Fe.22-24 Thus, this complex is a classic example of non-
innocent o-aminothiophenolato ligands coordinated to CrIII centers in an octahedral
geometry.
The 4 also crystallizes in space group R3c with an identical intramolecular
arrangement to compound 3. The main structural difference between clusters 3 and 4 is
the terminal groups: OEt for 3 and OMe for 4. The coordination of terminal ethoxide
groups to chromium and sodium atoms in 3 was a consequence of the ethanol used during
recrystallization. Using methanol instead of ethanol has proved this and as expected,
methoxide groups were found in the place of the terminal ethoxide groups in 4. In
crystals of 4, there are two crystallographically independent molecules 4a and 4b, having
different composition. They are shown in Fig. 3.3.2 and Fig. 3.3.3 respectively. The
difference between these two clusters arises from the coordination of the Na ion where, in
4a, the sodium is coordinated to three MeOH groups (Na(40)-O(41); 2.293(3) Å); while
in 4b, Na is coordinated to three OH2 groups (Na(40)-O(91); 2.319(3) Å). Characteristic
bond angles and bond distances for compounds 4a and 4b are presented in table 3.3.3 and
table 3.3.4, respectively. The average Cr....Cr distances in 4a and 4b are 3.177 ± 0.09Å
and 3.182 ± 0.09Å, respectively. The Cr-O-Cr angles in the Cr3O4 core are 98.8(1) and
107(1)° in 4a, and 98.6(1) and 105.4(1)° in 4b. The Average O-Cr-O bond angles are
88.17(9) and 89.53(9)° in 4a and 4b, correspondingly. The Cr(1)-O(25) and Cr(1)-O(31)
distances are 2.0035 (4) and 1.882(2) Å, respectively. The average Cr-N and Cr-S
distances of 1.930(3) and 2.3476(9) Å are comparable with the reported distances in CrIII
compounds.1,2,13, 20-21As observed in 3, in the ligand, the average C-S (1.733 ± 0.009 Å)
and C-N (1.344 ± 0.01 Å), bond lengths display substantial double bond character and the
six-membered rings exhibit distortions typical of quinoid type structures, namely two
Chapter 3 41
shorter C=C and four longer ones (1.374 ± 0.01 and 1.420 ± 0.01 ) and therefore indicate
the presence of o-iminothiobenzosemiquinonato (1-) π–radical ligands.
Bond angles (deg) for 4a Cr(1)# 2-O(21)-Cr(1) 98.8(1) Cr(1)#2-O(25)-Cr(1) 105.41(9) Cr(1)-O(25)-Na(40) 97.85(8) N(2)-Cr(1)-O(25)#1 166.78(9) O(25)#1-Cr(1)-O(25) 89.9(1) O(25)-Cr(1)-O(21) 77.67(7) O(25)-Cr(1)-S(1) 174.82(6) O(31)-Cr(1)-O(21) 164.2(1)
Bond angles (deg) for 4b Cr(2)# 4-O(71)-Cr(2) 98.6(1) Cr(2)#4-O(75)-Cr(2) 105.35(9) Cr(2)-O(75)-Na(90) 98.82(8) N(52)-Cr(2)-O(75) 167.1(1) O(75)-Cr(2)-O(75)#3 89.9(1) O(75)#3-Cr(2)-O(71) 77.66(8) O(25)#3-Cr(2)-S(51) 175.45(7) O(81)-Cr(2)-O(71) 163.9(1)
Bond distances [Å] Cr(1)-O(31) Cr(2)-O(81)
1.888(2) 1.897(2)
C(1)-C(2) C(51)-C(52)
1.433(4) 1.434(4)
Cr(1)-O(25) Cr(2)-O(75)
2.003(1) 1.987(2)
C(1)-C(6) C(51)-C(56)
1.412(4) 1.427(4)
Cr(1)-O(21) Cr(2)-O(71)
2.095(2) 2.096(1)
C(2)-C(3) C(52)-C(53)
1.422(4) 1.421(4)
Cr(1)-N(2) Cr(2)-N(52)
1.931(2) 1.929(3)
C(3)-C(4) C(53)-C(54)
1.368(5) 1.370(4)
Cr(1)-S(1) Cr(2)-S(51)
2.3459(8) 2.3493(9)
C(4)-C(5) C(54)-C(55)
1.414(5) 1.416(4)
Cr(1)-Na(40) Cr(2)-Na(90)
3.412(2) 3.461(2)
C(5)-C(6) C(55)-C(56)
1.380(5) 1.386(4)
S(1)-C(1) S(51)-C(51)
1.738(3) 1.728(3)
N(2)-C(2) N(52)-C(52)
1.343(4) 1.346(4)
Table 3.3.4: Selected bond distances [Å] for 4a and 4b.
Table 3.3.3: Selected bond angles in deg. for 4a and 4b.
Cuboidal Cr complexes 42
C(55)
Cr(2)
N(52)
S(51)
C(51)
C(52)C(56)
C(53)
O(81A) H(91B)
C(54)
Fig. 3.3.3: Thermal ellipsoid plot of 4b with labeling scheme and ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted.
C(5)
Cr(1)
N(2)
S(1)C(1)
C(2)
C(6)
C(3)
C(4)
O(25)
O(31A)H(41B)
O(21) Na(40)
Fig. 3.3.2: Ball and stick diagram and atom labeling scheme for 4a.
Chapter 3 43
3.4 Electrochemistry
The electrochemical behaviour of both of the cuboidal complexes 3 and 4
has been studied by cyclic voltammetry (CV) in dichloromethane containing [N(n-
bu)4]PF6 (0.10M) as supporting electrolyte. Ferrocene was used as an internal standard,
and all redox potentials have been referenced versus the ferrocenium/ferrocene (Fc+/Fc)
couple. As one might expect, clusters 3 and 4 show identical redox behaviour and for
simplification only the result with 3 is presented.
Fig. 3.4.1 displays the CV of complex 3 over the potential range of 1.0 V
to –2.0 V at room temperature. It shows two successive, reversible one electron processes
at -0.884 V (E11/2) and at -1.094 V (E2
1/2), plus one irreversible process at 0.46 V (E31/2).
The reversible processes correspond to the expected electron transfer series known for
many square-planar complexes containing o-iminothiobenzosemiquinonato radical
ligands, 22 where they correspond to ligand centered reductions. Thus the redox activity of
the compound 2.1 can be explained as shown below in scheme 3.4.1.
[CrIII3(OR)7(tLNS
ISQ)3]1- [CrIII3(OR)7(tLNS
ISQ)2(tLNSIP)]2-
[CrIII3(OR)7(tLNS
ISQ)(tLNSIP)2]3-
+e
+e
Scheme 3.4.1 redox activity of 3 and 4
Cuboidal Cr complexes 44
3.5 Electronic absorption spectrum
The electronic spectrum of compound 3, as shown in Fig. 3.5.1, displays a broad band in
the near infrared region between 1000 to 1400 nm (ε = 2.5 × 103 mol-1 cm-1). This band
may be a spin and dipole allowed ligand-to-ligand charge transfer transition (LLCT),
which is observed in all square-planar complexes of NiII, PdII, and PtII containing two
bidentate benzosemiquinonato type ligands.22 In the visible region appear two intense
bands at 696 nm (ε = 6 ×103 M-1 cm-1) and at 476 nm (ε = 6 × 103 M-1 cm-1). The higher
values of extinction coefficients indicate that they are charge transfer bands and most
probably ligand to metal charge transfer bands to the two unoccupied metal d orbitals.
Fig. 3.4.1: Cyclic voltammogram of 3 at 22ºC in CH2Cl2 solution, at the scanrate of 100 mV/s containing 0.10M[(n-bu)4N]PF6 with glassy carbon workingelectrode.
-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.0
E (V)
10 µ
A
Chapter 3 45
3.6 Magnetochemistry
Magnetic susceptibility data of cuboidal 3 and 4 were collected in the
temperature range 2 to 290 K in an applied magnetic field of 1T. Both of these
compounds show identical magnetic behaviors. Fig. 3.6.1 displays the magnetic moment
vs. temperature plot of 3. The analysis of the magnetic data was performed using
Heisenberg-Dirac-Van Vleck (HDVV) model. The least square fitting computer program
JULIUS-F and a full matrix diagonalization approach was employed to fit the
experimental data. The program uses the spin Hamiltonian operator, Htotal = HZ + HHDVV
in which the Zeeman interaction are given by HZ = µBBgiSi , and the exchange coupling is
described by HHDVV = -2J [S1S2+S2S3+S1S3].
400 600 800 1000 1200 14000.0
0.5
1.0
1.5ε
X 10
4 M-1
cm-1
λ nm
696
476
Fig. 3.5.1: Electronic absorption spectrum of the 3 in CH2Cl2 solution at 25ºC.
Cuboidal Cr complexes 46
The magnetization curve displays an effective magnetic moment of 4.93µB
in the region of 100 to 290 K. This value corresponds to the expected spin-only value for
three uncoupled S = 1 units ( 3)1( +SSg = 4.9µB). This leads to the consideration that
each CrIII (S=3/2) is strongly antiferromagnetically coupled to a radical (S=1/2) in order
to achieve a local S=1 spin state. The magnetic moment µeff /molecule of 4.93µB at 290 K
decreases monotonically with decrease of the temperature reaching the final value of 1.52
µB at 2 K, indicating antiferromagnetic exchange coupling between the three S=1 units.
The best fit (solid line in the Fig. 3.6.1) of the experimental data resulted in the following
parameters: gCr = 1.987, J = -2.164 cm-1, χTIP = 0.617 × 10-3 e.m.u.
Comparisons with other oxo bridged cubane complexes like [(η-
C5Me5)Cr(µ3-O)]4 (SCr=3/2) (J = -211cm-1),6 indicate that the exchange coupling
between the Cr atoms in 3 and 4 is very weak (J = -2.164cm-1). This can be attributed to
the presence of methoxy bridges. In the oxo-bridged complexes, oxygen has “sp” hybrid
orbitals and therefore, two of the filled p orbitals of the oxygen are available for the π
Fig. 3.6.1: Plot of µeff vs T for compound 3. The solid line represents the best least squares fitting for the experimental data (circles).
0 50 100 150 200 2502
3
4
5
Sim. Exp.
µ eff
/ µB
T/K
Chapter 3 47
interactions with the dxz and dyz orbitals of chromium. However in 3, and 4, the oxygen
from the methoxy bridges is involved in “sp2” hybridization and only one "p" orbital is
available for the π interactions with d orbitals in chromium. Consequently, a weak
antiferromagnetic exchange interaction is present between the three Cr metal centers, thus
leading to smaller J values. The methoxy ligand is commonly used as a bridge in oligo-
and polynuclear transition metal clusters25-29 including chromium clusters.16
K[Fe3(OCH3)7(dbm)3]4CH3OH19 (dbm = dibenzoylmethane), is an analogous cuboidal
cluster to 3 and 4, in which three high-spin iron(III) metal centers are
antiferromagnetically coupled with an S = 1/2 spin ground state with J = -10.6cm-1.
Similarly, in methoxy bridging oligo- and polynuclear chromium clusters, the
antiferromagnetic exchange couplings between chromium ions are in a similar range of (J
= -1.9 to10 cm-1).16 The magnetic properties of reported clusters were studied using the
Hamiltonian of type Hex = -2 J S1S2 (S1 and S2 are intrinsic spins of chromium), where in
the case of compounds 3 and 4 a simple model was used to describe what is actually a
more complex situation. This may be understood by considering that the intrinsic spin of
S = 1 is partially delocalized on the chromium and the radical ligand. Values of these
delocalized spins are obtained by projection technique and the rest of the couplings are
obtained by considering a full Hamiltonian so obtained as described below in Fig. 3.6.2
and scheme 3.6.1.
S 1=1 S
2 =1
J
J'
J"
J'
S1Cr S2
Cr
S1rad S2
rad
Fig. 3.6.2: exchange coupling interactions between two Cr centers and coordinated
radical ligands in the 3
Cuboidal Cr complexes 48
As described in scheme 3.6.1, the exchange coupling constant JCr, is a
major contributor to the antiferromagnetic exchange between chromium centers (-25/16
J). In addition, a smaller contribution from ferromagnetic exchange coupling between
chromium and radical (5/8 J'), and negligible contributions from radical-radical
antiferromagnetic exchange coupling (-1/16 J") were also needed in order to get the total
J. Therefore, the total value of the coupling constant J is different than the one that
should expected if only a chromium-chromium exchange would have been taken into
account.
Fig. 3.6.3 shows the energy ladder calculated for 3 and 4 by using the
program ENERGY. This program calculates the energies of the different spin states using
the equation 3.6.2, in which, the J value obtained from previous fits are applied.
The energy ladder plot shows the ST = 0 spin ground state of 3 and 4 as a single non-
degenerate level. On the other hand, non-integer spin systems arranged in an equilateral
triangle exhibit spin frustration i.e. orbitally degenerate ground state. Equilateral triangles
Hex = - 2 JCr SCr.SCr - [2 J'Cr.rad SCr.Srad ]2 – 2 J"
rad Srad.Srad
By applying the spin projection technique for energetically well-
isolated total spin manifolds, for S1 = S2 =1
SCr = 5/4 S1
Srad = -1/4 S1
Hex = (-25/8 JCr + 5/4 J'Cr.rad –1/8 J"
rad.rad) S1S2
Comparing this with hamiltonian, Hex = -2 J S1S2
J = -25/16 JCr + 5/8 J'Cr.rad –1/16 J"
rad.rad
Scheme 3.6.1
E(ST) = - J [ST(ST+1) –3S(S+1)] eq. 3.6.2 Where, S* = S2+S3, ST= S1+S*, S1=S2=S3=S
Chapter 3 49
with local S = 1 spin states are very uncommon in the literature. Hence these clusters are
very exceptional examples of S = 1 spin-triangles having three equal J values.
Ene
rgy
(cm
-1)
Field (T)
S = 0
S = 1
S = 2
S = 3
Fig. 3.6.3: Energy level scheme for a spin-spin interaction of the formH = - 2J [S1S2+S2S3+S1S3] with S1 = S2 = S3 = 1 for 3.
Cuboidal Cr complexes 50
3.7 Conclusions
The reported compounds 3, 4a and 4b are archetypal CrIII cuboidal
clusters with a N,S- coordination. Methoxy bridges are also an additional feature of these
cuboidal complexes. The structural features of 3, 4a, and 4b demonstrated that the ligand,
2-mercapto-3, 5-di-tert-butylaniline exists in o-iminothiobenzosemiquinonato (1-) π–
radical form, which verifies the noninnocent nature of o-aminothiophenolato ligands.
Magnetic behaviour of these complexes show antiferromagnetic exchange coupling
between three S = 1 spins giving a singly non-degenerate S = 0 ground state, and thus
making these clusters very exceptional examples of S = 1 spin-triangles having three
equal J values.
Chapter 3 51
3.8 References
1) Bodensieck; W., Carraux, Y.; Stoeckli-Evans, K.; Süss-Fink, G. Inorg. Chim.
Acta 1992, 195, 135.
2) Stein, C.; Bouma, S.; Carlson, J.; Cornelius, C.; Maeda, J.; Weschler, C.; Deutsch,
E.; Hodgson, K. O. Inorg. Chem. 1976, 15, 1183.
3) Shibutani, Y.; Shinra, K.; Matsumoto, C. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1981, 43, 1345.
4) Larkoworthy, L. F.; Murphy, J. M.; Phillips, D. J. Inorg. Chem. 1968, 7, 1436.
5) (a) Schrock, R. R.; Listemann, M. L.; Sturgeoff, L. G. J Am. Chem. Soc. 1982,
104, 4291. (b) Chisholm, M. H.; Kelly, R. L., Inorg. Chem. 1979, 18, 2266 (c)
Chisholm, M. H.: Huffman, J. C.; Marchant, N. S., Polyhedron 1984, 3, 1033.
6) Allen, D. P.; Bottomley, F.; Day, R. W.; Decken, A.; Sanchez, V.; D. Summers,
A.; Thompson, R. C. Organometallics 2001, 20, 1840.
7) Bottomley, F.; Paez, D. E.; White, P.S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 5581.
8) Bottomley, F.; Paez, D. E.; Sutin, L.; White, P.S.; Kohler, F.H.; Thompson, R.C.;
Westwood, N. P. C. Organometallics 1990, 9, 2443.
9) Bottomley, F.; Paez, D. E.; White, P.S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 5651.
10) Eshel, M.; Bino, A. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2002, 329, 45.
11) Coxall, R. A.; Parkin, A.; Parsons, S.; Smith, A. A.; Timco, G.A.; Winpenny, R.
E. P. J. Solid State Chem. 2001, 159, 321.
12) Parsons, S.; Smith, A. A.; and Winpenny, R. E. P. Chem. Commun. 2000, 579.
13) Elder, R. C.; Florian, L.; Lake, R. E.; Yacynych, A. M. Inorg. Chem. 1973, 12,
2690.
14) MacNeese, T. J.; Muller, T. E.; Wierda, D. A.; Darensbourge, D. J. Inorg. Chem.
1985, 24, 3465.
15) MacNeese, T. J.; Cohen, M. B.; and Foxman, B. M. Organometallics 1984, 3,
552.
16) (a) Fischer, H. R.; Glerup, J.; Hodgson, D. J.; Pedersen, E., Inorg. Chem. 1982,
21, 3063. (b) Paine, T. K.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt, K.; Chaudhuri, P.,
Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 6538.
17) Bottomley, F.; Chen, L.; and MacIntosh, S. M. Organometallics 1991, 10, 906.
Cuboidal Cr complexes 52
18) Herrmann, W. A.; Alberto, R.; Bryan, J. C.; Sattelberger, A. P. Chem. Ber. 1991,
124, 1107.
19) Caneschi, A.; Cornia, A.; Fabretti, A.C.; Gatteschi, D.; Malavasi, W. Inorg.
Chem. 1995, 34, 4660.
20) De Meester, P.; Hodgson, D. J.; Freeman, H. C.; Moore, C. J. Inorg. Chem. 1977,
16, 1494.
21) Pattanayak, S.; Das, D. K.; Chakraborty, P.; Chakravorty, A. Inorg. Chem. 1995,
34, 6556.
22) Herebian, D.; Bothe, E.; Bill, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 10012.
23) Herebian, D.; Ghosh, P.; Chun, H.; Bothe, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt, K.
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 1957.
24) Ghosh, P.; Bill, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 1293.
25) Burlitch, J. M.; Hayes, S. E.; Whitwell, G. E. Organometallics 1982, 1, 1074.
26) Papaefthy, G. C.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 11753.
27) Andrew, J. E.; Black, A. B. J. Chem. Soc. A 1969, 1456.
28) Pence, L. E.; Canesci, A.; Lippard, S. J. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 3069.
29) Brechin, E. K.; Harris, S. G.; Parsons, S.; Winpenny, R. E. P. Chem. Commun.
1996. 1439.
Chapter 4 53
4.1 Introduction:
Large discrepancies exist in the literature about nickel complexes
containing two bidentate N,S-coordinated o-aminothiophenolate ligands,1-3 mostly due to
the overly strict treatment of the oxidation states of the metal without a complete analysis
involving the ligand, which is also redox active. Recently a more detailed study of the
structures4 together with theoretical analysis5 has shown that contributions of the ligand to
the properties of such compounds are important. Accordingly, the physical oxidation
level of these ligands is often best evaluated as an open shell, monoanionic π radical (o-
iminothiobenzosemiquinonato), which may lead to a singlet diradical ground state for
neutral NiL2 complexes. Nickel complexes with cyclic tetradentate N2S2-coordinated
ligands, falls in to two different categories (Fig. 4.1.1): (a) Compounds containing a
ligand derivative where the amino nitrogen
atoms form C=N double bonds (Schiff
bases). (b) Compounds containing a C-N
single bond between the amino nitrogen and
the carbon. As examples of the complexes
that are included in the family of compounds
(a), [Ni(PEX)] (S,S-o-xylyl-2,3-pentanedione
bis(mercaptoethylimine)nickel(II)),6 [Ni(BMAX)] (PEX = S,S-o-xylyl-2,3-butanedione
bis(mercaptoanil)), and [Ni(CAMX)] (CAMX = S,S-o-xylyl-1,2-cyclohexanedione
bis(mercaptoanil))7 and [Ni(gma)]8 (gma = glyoxal-bis(2-mercaptoaniline), which all
S
N
M
R2R1
S
N
M
H R2
R1
Fig. 4.1.1(a) (b)
Chapter 4 Ni, Co and Zn complexes of
2-phenylbenzothiazoline
Ni, Co and Zn complexes 54
contain an sp2 hybridized nitrogen donor. The physical oxidation state of the central metal
can be unambiguously established in these compounds as NiII close shell (d8) by making
use of the structural information of the ligand, where the C=N bond length of the Schiff
base is short at 1.29 ± 0.02 Å and the N-CPhenyl bond is found at 1.41 ± 0.02 Å. However,
discrepancies arise when these compounds are reduced by one electron. Recently DFT
calculations have clarified the appropriate description of the electronic structure for
[Ni(gma)]1- as containing a closed shell NiII ion bound to a (gma•)3- trianionic radical
ligand.10
In the case of complexes that fall in to the category (b), the physical oxidation state and
the electronic configuration are not clearly understood due to the absence of high quality
crystal structures of such complexes. The complex [Ni(H2gma)] (a bridge-saturated
derivative of [Ni(gma)], where gma = glyoxal bis(2-mercaptoaniline)), is one of the key
examples included in this category of compounds, since it has been described in the
literature having two different models of its electronic structure which have been
critically and controversially discussed. On one hand Gray et al.11 have proposed that
N
S
N
S
H H
Ni
R R
Fig.4.1.2a (above): diradical structure proposed by Gray and 4.1.2b (below): resonance structure proposed by Holm and
Kushi et al.
N
S
N
S
H H
NiN
S
N
S
H H
Ni
R R R R
Chapter 4 55
these species are diradicals with a singlet ground state (Fig. 4.1.2a) On the other hand,
Holm et al.12 proposed that two resonance structures (Fig. 4.1.2b) describe the ground
state. In this case, [Ni(H2gma)]- (S = 1/2) may be described in a purely formal sense as
NiIII with a (d7) configuration, where unpaired electron will be nickel based, which in turn
result in large g value anisotropies. On the contrary, Gray et al.11 proposed that the
anisotropy in the g tensor is not a reliable criterion of metal d orbital involvement,
particularly in complexes with ligands containing atoms with large spin-orbit coupling
constants (e.g. Sulfur). The crystal structure of [Ni(H2gma)]- is not available, but Gray et
al. have reported the crystal structure of the related complex, diacetyldihydrobis (2-
mercaptoanil)nickel monoanion, [NEt4][Ni(H2dma)].11 The C-S and C-N bond distances
of this complex are an arithmetic average of mono- and dianionic (LNSISQ)1- and (LNS
IP)2-
forms of ligands. At this point, Wieghardt et al.13 (scheme 4.1.1.) have proposed the
existence of a single radical delocalized over both the ligands (H2LNS). Similar properties
were found in [Ni(ddbt)] and [Co(ddbt)] (ddbt = bis-2,2'-(1,2-
diphenylethelylediimine)benzenethiolato), formed via a ring opening reaction of the 2-
phenylbenzothiazoline ligand.14 In both complexes the assignment of the oxidation state
of each metal was made considering the resonance forms of the ligand; thus the central
metal is assigned as MII.
Wieghardt et al.13 have recently established a series of cobalt and nickel
complexes containing two bidentate non-innocent ligands. It has been possible to
differentiate the oxidation states of the ligand by low temperature (100 K)
crystallography. For the neutral nickel complex, the ground state is a singlet diradical
S
HN
[M(LNSIP)2]n
M
S
HN
M
S
HN
M
[M(LNSISQ)2]n [M(LNS
IP)(LNSISQ)]n
1.35
1.72
1.411.36
1.42
1.38 1.431.76
1.37
Av. 1.39 1.365
1.741.42
1.411.385
1.40
5
1.375 1.40
Av.1.405
Scheme 4.1.1
Ni, Co and Zn complexes 56
(NiII; d8), however in the analogues cobalt complex the situation is more complicated.
Spectroscopic oxidation states describing a CoIII (d6) or CoII (d7) electron configuration
cannot be unambiguously assigned. The structures of [Ni(ddbt)] and [Co(ddbt)]14 were
obtained at room temperature, with an average experimental error of a given C-C, C-N or
C-S bond lengths of ≅ ±0.03Å (= 3σ), which may not have allowed a correct assignment
of the oxidation level of ligands. To obtain more insight into these complexes, the one
electron reduced forms of these complexes are described here.
Kochin et al. have reported a Zn complex which was formed via a ring
opening reaction of 2-phenylbenzothiazoline ligand and formulated as [Zn(ddbt)].15
Corbin et al. pointed out that it should be possible that the bridging ligand present in Zn
complex, could be removed by reduction of the complex with sodium borohydride,
removing the Zn as Zn(OH)2.16 But as this was not successful, the formulation of this
complex was doubtful. Therefore we decided to synthesis Zn complex and to
characterize it by X-ray structure analysis.
4.2 Synthesis and characterization
Complexes [Ni(Phbt)2] (5i), [Ni(ddbt)] (5), [Co(Phbt)2] (6i), [Co(ddbt)]14
(6) and [Zn(Phbt)2]16 (7) (where, Phbt = bis-(2-phenylmethyleneamino)benzenethiolato,
and ddbt = Bis-2,2'-(1,2-diphenylethylenediimine)benzenethiolato) were synthesized as
described in the literature. The general synthetic procedure for all the compounds is
demonstrated in scheme 4.2.1.
Scheme 4.2.1: Synthesis of [M(Phbt)] and [M(ddbt)]
M 2+
MeOH Toluene[M(Phbt)2] [M(ddbt)]LPh
RefluxNH2
SH
PhCHO
MeOHLNS
HN
S
H
PhN
S S
NM
PhPh
N
S S
NM
PhPhH H
Chapter 4 57
[Ni(ddbt)] (5):
[Ni(Phbt)2] (5i), was obtained in ethanol by 2:1 reaction of the 2-phenylbenzothiazoline
with nickel(II) acetate tetrahydrate. Heating for 10 minutes afforded deep brown crystals
of [Ni(Phbt)2]. Black crystals of [Ni(ddbt)] (5) were obtained by heating 5i for 1 h in
toluene. In all the [M(ddbt)] compounds the carbon-carbon bond formation takes place
between two imino carbon atoms in ligands. Crystals of 5 suitable for X-Ray analysis
were obtained by slow evaporation of a mixture of CHCl3 and MeOH.
[Co(ddbt)2] (6):
6i was obtained in a better yield than previously reported14 by dissolving the ligand 2-
phenylbenzothiozoline in ethanol, with cobalt acetate tetrahydrate, in presence of 4 eq. of
base (NaOMe). Heating for 20 minutes afforded deep brown crystals of 6i. Complex
[Co(ddbt)2] (6) was formed by heating 6i for 1 h in toluene under inert atmosphere,
resulting in the greenish blue solution of 6. Crystals of 6 suitable for X-ray analysis were
obtained by slow evaporation of a mixture of MeCN and MeOH.
[Zn(Phbt)2] (7):
An orange solid of [Zn(Phbt)2] (7) was obtained after the addition of zinc acetate to a
solution of 2-phenylbenzothiazoline in methanol. Further heating in toluene for more
than 2 hours did not result in any change contrary to the case of the [Ni(ddbt)] and
[Co(ddbt)] complexes. Crystals suitable for X-ray structure analysis were obtained from a
mixture of CH2Cl2 and MeOH.
[Co(Cp2)][Ni(ddbt)] (5b) and [Co(Cp2)][Co(ddbt)] (6b):
The one-electron reduced forms of [Ni(ddbt)] and [Co(ddbt)] were
obtained by using 1 equivalent of cobaltocene as a reducing agent resulting in two new
compounds [Co(Cp2)][Ni(ddbt)] (5b) and [Co(Cp2)][Co(ddbt)] (6b), subsequently. Dark
green and dark violet crystals of 5b and 6b were obtained by slow evaporation of
mixture of acetonitrile and hexane.
Ni, Co and Zn complexes 58
4.3 Molecular Structures
The crystal structures of compound 5, 6, 7, 5b, and 6b at 100(2) K have
been determined using Mo Kα radiation.
Fig. 4.3.1 shows a thermal ellipsoid plot of [Ni(ddbt)] (5) and table 4.3.1
displays the most important bond distances. 5 crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal
system with a space group P21/n. The coordination geometry of NiII is square planar and
the dihedral angle between N-Ni-S planes is 7.7°. The phenyl groups on carbon atoms
C(8) and C(9) are staggered and trans to each other with a torsion angle of 144°. The
average intramolecular Ni-S and Ni-N distances of 2.1270(4) and 1.8194(10) Å are
consistent with the reported values for this complex.14 These distances are also
comparable to the Ni-S and Ni-N distances in several NiII complexes having N2S2 chelate
ligand coordination.17
The C-S (1.7185 ± 0.009Å) and C-N (1.3515 ± 0.009 Å), bond distances
show a substantial double bond character and the phenyl rings exhibit distortions typical
of quinoid type structures: two shorter C=C and four longer ones (1.3723 and 1.4197 Å).
Fig. 4.3.1: Thermal ellipsoid plot of 5 at the 50% probability level with atom labelling scheme.
Ni (1)
S(12)S(1)
C(1)C(2)
C(12) C(13)
C(14)
C(6)
C(5)C(4)
C(3)
C(15)
C(16)
C(11)N(7)
N(10)
C(8)C(9)
Chapter 4 59
As per the criterion developed by Wieghardt et al.4 for the identification of radical ligands
in 3,5-di-tert-butyl-aminothiophenolates, these features in the bond distance of the ligand
indicate the presence of o-iminothiobenzosemiquinonato (1-) π–radical ligands instead of
the suggested resonance structures. Thus, based on this thorough analysis of the ligand
oxidation levels, 5 can be assigned as having a singlet diradical ground state (NiII, d8).
The structure of 6 is isostructural with that of compound 5; therefore it is
not shown separately. Selected bond lengths are represented in table 4.3.2. In the
structure of 6, both of the ligands exhibit deprotonation of the nitrogen and sulfur atoms
coordinated to metal. The complex has a square planer configuration, with the dihedral
angle in the N-Co-S planes of 8.8°. The phenyl groups on carbons C(8) and C(9) are
staggered with a torsion angle of 142.77°. The average intra molecular Co-S and Co-N
distances at 2.1386(6) and 1.815(2) Å, respectively are identical to the reported distances
for the same complex; (2.139(2) Å and (1.815(4) Å, respectively).14 The Co-N distances
are similar to the distances observed in CoIII complexes, [Co(2LN)2] (1.862(2)) and
[Co(4LO)2] (1.822(2)) (2LN represents o-phenylenediamine, and 4LO represents 2-(2-
trifluromethyl)anilino-4,6-di-tert-butylphenol)). The C-S (1.736 ± 0.02Å) and C-N (1.368
± 0.02Å), bond lengths display intermediate character between a single and a double
Bond distance [Å]
Ni(1)-N(7)
Ni(1)-S(1)
S(1)-C(1)
N(7)-C(6)
C(1)-C(2)
C(1)-C(6)
C(2)-C(3)
C(3)-C(4)
C(4)-C(5)
C(5)-C(6)
1.818(1)
2.1268(4)
1.719(1)
1.351(1)
1.409(2)
1.432(2)
1.375(2)
1.420(2)
1.369(2)
1.420(2)
Ni(1)-N(10)
Ni(1)-S(12)
S(12)-C(12)
N(10)-C(11)
C(11)-C(12)
C(11)-C(16)
C(12)-C(13)
C(13)-C(14)
C(14)-C(15)
C(15)-C(16)
1.820(1)
2.1271(4)
1.718(1)
1.352(1)
1.432(2)
1.419(2)
1.405(2)
1.379(2)
1.410(2)
1.379(2)
Table 4.3.1: Selected distances [Å] for (5)
Ni, Co and Zn complexes 60
bond and the six C-C bonds of the six-memberd ring are nearly equidistant within the 3σ
level (1.390 ± 0.02 Å) as shown in scheme 4.1.1. This suggests a formal oxidation state
of +3 for the cobalt centre with a charge distribution of this species as
[CoIII(LNSIP)(LNS
ISQ)], with delocalization of the charge over both of the ligands. Thus, the
valence isomerisation picture of ligand, demonstrated by Kushi et al., which leads to CoII
formalism is erroneous and [Co(ddbt)] can be more correctly formulated as described
above with CoIII oxidation state of central metal.
Fig. 4.3.3 displays a thermal ellipsoid plot of [Zn(pdbt)2] (7) and selected
bond lengths are presented in table 4.3.3. The structure of 7 belongs to the P21/n space
group. As is apparent from the Fig. 4.3.3, the zinc atom is four coordinate with two
sulfur and the two imine nitrogen atoms of the two 2-phenylbenzothiazoline ligands. The
Zn ion has a distorted tetrahedral geometry, with a dihedral angle of 88.54(4)º between
the S-Zn-N planes. The Zn-S and Zn-N average distances of 2.2687(5) and 2.1028(13) Å
are in the expected range of these distances.18 The S(1)-Zn(1)-S(21) angle (121.01(2)º) is
slightly larger than expected for a tetrahedral geometry, while N(7)-Zn(1)-N(27) ,
(111.51(5)º) angle is close to the tetrahedral angle of 109º. The C-S (1.760 ± 0.006 Å)
and C-N (1.432 ± 0.004 Å) average bond lengths clearly display only single bond
Bond distance [Å]
Co(1)-N(7)
Co(1)-S(1)
S(1)-C(1)
N(7)-C(6)
C(1)-C(2)
C(1)-C(6)
C(2)-C(3)
C(3)-C(4)
C(4)-C(5)
C(5)-C(6)
1.816(2)
2.1384(6)
1.738(2)
1.365(3)
1.398(3)
1.417(3)
1.379(3)
1.407(3)
1.372(3)
1.411(3)
Co(1)-N(10)
Co(1)-S(12)
S(12)-C(12)
N(10)-C(11)
C(11)-C(12)
C(11)-C(16)
C(12)-C(13)
C(13)-C(14)
C(14)-C(15)
C(15)-C(16)
1.815(2)
2.1388(6)
1.735(2)
1.371(3)
1.413(3)
1.411(3)
1.397(3)
1.377(3)
1.395(3)
1.390(3)
Table 4.3.2: Selected distances [Å] for 6.
Chapter 4 61
character. In addition the six C-C (1.402 ± 0.006 Å) bonds of the six-membered ring do
not show quinoid type distortion being equidistant within 3σ, confirming the normal
closed shell form of the ligands with [ZnII(Phbt)2] formalism of the complex.
Bond distance [Å]
Zn(1)-N(7)
Zn(1)-S(1)
N(7)-C(8)
S(1)-C(1)
C(6)-N(7)
C(1)-C(2)
C(1)-C(6)
C(2)-C(3)
C(3)-C(4)
C(4)-C(5)
C(5)-C(6)
2.093(1)
2.2646(5)
1.293(2)
1.762(2)
1.429(2)
1.402(2)
1.407(2)
1.384(2)
1.391(3)
1.389(2)
1.400(2)
Zn(1)-N(27)
Zn(1)-S(21)
N(27)-C(28)
S(21)-C(21)
C(26)-N(27)
C(21)-C(22)
C(21)-C(26)
C(22)-C(23)
C(23)-C(24)
C(24)-C(25)
C(25)-C(26)
2.113(1)
2.2728(5)
1.291(2)
1.758(2)
1.435(2)
1.403(2)
1.405(2)
1.381(3)
1.386(3)
1.386(3)
1.395(2)
Table 4.3.3 Selected distances [Å] for 7
Zn (1) S(21)S(1)
C(1)C(2)
C(22)
C(23)
C(24)
C(6)
C(5)C(4)
C(3)
C(25)
C(26)
C(21)
N(7)
N(27)
C(8)
C(9)
Fig. 4.3.2 A thermal ellipsoid plot of 7 at the 50% probability level with labelling scheme.
Ni, Co and Zn complexes 62
The thermal ellipsoid plot of [Co(Cp)2][Ni(ddbt)] (5b) with the labelling
scheme as well as the most relevant bond distances are shown below in Fig. 4.3.4 and
table 4.3.4, respectively. The crystal structure of the complex consists of the packing of
discrete Co(Cp2)+ cations and approximately planar Ni(ddbt)- anions (dihedral angle
between N-Ni-S planes is 2.7°). Molecule possesses idealized C2 symmetry. The
crystallographic data show that the Ni-S and Ni-N distances of 2.1444(3) and 1.8216(10)
Å are identical to those of the neutral complex [Ni(ddbt)] (5) within the experimental
error (±0.03Å), suggesting a similar oxidation state of the central Ni in both the neutral
(5) and reduced form (5b) thus confirming the ligand centered reduction. These distances
are consistent with those of the monoanionic nickel complexes [Ni(H2dma)]11 (where
dma represents diacetyldihydrobis(2-mercaptoanil)), and [Ni(-SC6H4-o-NH-)2]-.2,3 The C-
S (1.747 ± 0.004 Å) and C-N (1.371 ± 0.005 Å) average bond distances are intermediate
between a single and a double bonds as it was observed in the [Co(ddbt)] (6). These
distances are precisely the arithmetic mean of a single and a double bond length. In
addition, the six C-C (1.402 ± 0.006 Å) bonds of the aromatic ring do not show the
already discussed quinoid distortion being intermediate between a single and a double
bonds as it is depicted in scheme 4.1.1, thus confirming the presence of a radical ligand
where the charge is delocalized over both of the ligands.
Bond distance [Å]
Ni(1)-N(7)
Ni(1)-S(1)
S(1)-C(1)
N(7)-C(6)
1.822(1)
2.1444(3)
1.747(1)
1.370(1)
C(1)-C(2)
C(1)-C(6)
C(2)-C(3)
C(3)-C(4)
C(4)-C(5)
C(5)-C(6)
1.398(2)
1.425(2)
1.388(2)
1.400(2)
1.389(2)
1.410(2)
Table 4.3.4: Selected distances [Å] for 5b
Chapter 4 63
The thermal ellipsoid plot and labelling scheme of 6b is shown in Fig.
4.3.5 and relevant bond distances are reported in table 4.3.5. The structure belongs to the
space group P21/c. Each molecule in the unit cell possesses square planar geometry with a
dihedral angle of 2.2° between N-Co-S planes. The Co(1)-N(7) and Co(1)-S(1) distances
of 1.825(10) Å and 2.170 (3) Å, respectively are identical within the experimental error
(±0.03Å) to the corresponding neutral compound [Co(ddbt)] (6) indicating a ligand
centered reduction. It is important to note that the average C-S bond lengths for both
ligands are quite long in the range of 1.76(1) Å. The six C-C distances of the aromatic
rings (1.403 ± 0.05; 3σ) are also equidistant within the range of experimental error. The
average C-C distance at 1.393(3) Å is typical for an aromatic phenyl ring. In particular,
the long C-S bonds indicate the presence of N,S-coordinated aromatic 1,2-
imidothiophenolate(2-) ligands, implying an assignment of a +3 oxidation state to the
Fig. 4.3.4: A thermal ellipsoid plot of 5b at the 50% probability level with atom labelling scheme.
Ni (1)
S(12)S(1)
C(1)C(2) C(12) C(13)
C(14)
C(6)
C(5)C(4)
C(3)
C(15)
C(16)
C(11)N(7)
N(10)
C(8) C(9)
Co(1)
Ni, Co and Zn complexes 64
central cobalt atom. coordinated aromatic 1,2-imidothiophenolate(2-) ligands, implying
an assignment of a +3 oxidation state to the central cobalt atom.
Bond distance [Å]
Co(1)-N(7)
Co(1)-S(1)
S(1)-C(1)
N(7)-C(6)
C(1)-C(2)
C(1)-C(6)
C(2)-C(3)
C(3)-C(4)
C(4)-C(5)
C(5)-C(6)
1.83(1)
2.173(3)
1.76(1)
1.37(1)
1.40(2)
1.42(2)
1.39(2)
1.40(2)
1.39(2)
1.41(2)
Co(1)-N(10)
Co(1)-S(12)
S(12)-C(12)
N(10)-C(11)
C(11)-C(12)
C(11)-C(16)
C(12)-C(13)
C(13)-C(14)
C(14)-C(15)
C(15)-C(16)
1.83(1)
2.168(3)
1.76(1)
1.38(1)
1.407(2)
1.404(2)1.
389(2)
1.39(2)
1.38(2)
1.398(2)
Co (1)
S(12)
S(1)
C(1)C(2)
C(12)
C(14)
C(6)
C(5)C(4)
C(3)
C(15)
C(16)
C(11)
N(7)
N(10)
C(8)
C(9)
C(13)Co (2)
Fig. 4.3.5:A thermal ellipsoid plot of 6b at the 50% probability level with atom labelling scheme.
Table 4.3.5: Selected distances in [Å] for 6b
Chapter 4 65
DFT calculations on the nickel complexes namely [Ni(1LN)2] and
[Ni(1LN)2]1- show that (Fig. 4.3.6) the central nickel ions in both complexes have a +2
oxidation state. The HOMO in the monoanion is 2b2g, which have 26% 3dxz character thus
making this redox active SOMO predominantly ligand based. The reason of predominant
ligand character in 2b2g orbital in case of nickel is the higher effective nuclear charge of
Ni relative to cobalt that brings the 3d orbitals much lower in energy relative to the ligand
orbitals for Ni.
In contrast, the spin triplet [Co(1LN)2]1- have shown that the HOMO is a
2b2g orbital, which has almost equal contributions from the metal and the ligand and thus,
the explicit assignment of electron configuration at the metal ion (i.e. to determine the dn
(n = 6 or 7)) is not possible. But in contrast to this situation, the geometry of the ligands
Fig. 4.3.6: MO schemes of [Co(1LN)2]1- and [Ni(1LN)2]1-
Ni, Co and Zn complexes 66
in [Co(ddbt)]1- as determined by X-ray crystallography clearly suggest a CoIII (d6, S=1)
spectroscopic oxidation state over a mixed-valence configuration.13
4.4. Electrochemistry of 5 and 6
The redox properties of 5 and 6 have been studied in CH2Cl2 and MeCN,
respectively by cyclic voltammetry (CV). [N(n-Bu)4][PF6] (0.10M) was used as a
supporting electrolyte, glassy carbon as working electrode and Ag/AgNO3 as the
reference electrode. Ferrocene was used as internal standard, and all redox potentials are
referenced vs. the ferrocene/ferrocenium (Fc/Fc+) couple at room temperature. Fig. 4.4.1
and 4.4.2 show the cyclic voltammograms of 5 and 6 from +2.0 V to -2.0 V and +0.5 V to
–2.0 V, respectively. For 5, four reversible electron-transfer waves were observed and
three reversible electron-transfer waves were observed for 6. Table 4.4.1 and 4.4.2
summarizes the redox potentials (E1/2) of electron transfer waves for compounds 5 and 6
vs. (Fc / Fc+), respectively.
According to coulometric measurements at appropriate fixed potentials,
two waves in 5 namely; E31/2, and E4
1/2 correspond to two reversible oxidation processes
and the other two waves, E11/2 and E2
1/2 correspond to two reversible reduction processes.
This behavior for 5 correspond exactly to that reported4 for [NiII(LISQ)2] (LISQ = 3,5-di-
tert-butyl-iminothiobenzosemiquinone) (table 4.4.1), where it was shown that these
processes are ligand centered rather than metal centered as explained in scheme 4.4.1.
Such complete (or incomplete) electron transfer series have been reported for many
Compound E11/2(2-/1-) E2
1/2(1-/0) E31/2(0/1+) E4
1/2(1+/2+)
[NiII(LISQ)2] -1.714 -0.826 +0.284 0.896(irr.)
[Ni(ddbt)] (13) -1.509 -0.658 +0.574 +1.017
Table 4.4.1: Redox potentials [V] of 5 and [NiII(LISQ)2] vs. Fc/Fc+ at 22° C.
Chapter 4 67
square-planar NiII, PdII and PtII complexes containing two catecholate, phenylenediamide,
benzodithiolate, or o-iminothiophenolate ligands. 8, 12a, 20
For 6, two reversible reduction processes, E11/2 and E2
1/2 and one oxidation process E31/2
are observed. Similar cyclic voltammograms and redox potentials (table 4.4.2) have been
reported for [CoIII(1LN)2],12a [CoIII(2LN)2],13 and [CoIII(4LO)2] (2LN represents o-
-e+e[NiII(ddbt)]
-e+e
+e -e -e +e
[NiII(ddbt)]1-
[NiII(ddbt)]2-
[NiII(ddbt)]1+
[NiII(ddbt)]2+
Scheme 4.4.1: Redox activity of 5
Fig. 4.4.1: Cyclic Voltammogram of 5 in CH2Cl2 solution containing 0.10M[(n-bu)4N][PF6], at 22°C and scan rates of 50, 100, 200, 400, 1000 mV/s usingglassy carbon working electrode.
-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.5
10 µ
A
I (µA
)
E (mV)
Ni, Co and Zn complexes 68
phenylenediamine, and 4LO represents 2-(2-trifluromethyl)anilino-4,6-di-tert-
butylphenol)),13 showing the similar redox activity in all of these complexes as explained
by scheme 4.4.2, reinforcing the +3 oxidation state of cobalt in 6.
Although, the peak height of E31/2 is half as intense compard with the other two reversible
reduction processes, controlled potential coulometry has shown that the three processes
consumed same amount of current, indicating that each of them correspond to one
electron transfer process. Interestingly, the redox potentials for the reduction waves E21/2
are found to be similar in both of compounds, 5 and 6 irrespective of the nature of the
central metal ion (nickel or cobalt). However, the oxidation potentials differ in both of
them.
Compound E11/2(2-/1-) [V] E2
1/2(1-/0) [V] E31/2(0/1+) [V]
[Co(1LN)2] -1.98 -0.95 -0.32
[Co(2LN)2] -1.03 -0.50
[Co(4LO)2] -0.85 -0.20
[Co(ddbt)] (3.2) -1.81 -0.61 -0.027
Table 4.4.1- Redox potentials [V] of 6 and other complexes vs. Fc/Fc+ at 22° C.
N
S
N
S
HPhH
Ni
N
S
N
S
H HPh
Ni
Ph
N
S
N
S
H HPh
Ni
Ph Ph
[Ni(ddbt)]1-
[Ni(ddbt)]2-
[Ni(ddbt)]1+
N
S
N
S
H HPh
Ni
Ph
[Ni(ddbt)]2+
N
S
N
S
H HPh
Ni
Ph
[Ni(ddbt)]
+e
+e
+e
+e
Fig. 4.4.1: relevant structures for the redox series of [Ni(ddbt)]
Chapter 4 69
4.5 Electronic absorption spectra
Controlled-potential coulometry allows the selective generation of the
stable monocation as well as the mono- and dianions of 5 of which the respective
electronic spectra have been recorded. The electronic spectra for all these species are
shown in Fig. 4.5.1. The neutral complex 5 shows an intense band in the near infrared
region at 820 nm (ε = 4.2 × 104 M-1 cm-1), that likely corresponds to a spin and dipole
allowed ligand-to-ligand charge transfer transition (LLCT), which is observed in all
square-planar complexes of NiII, PdII, and PtII containing two bidentate o-
Scheme. 4.4.2- redox activity of 6.
[CoIII(ddbt)]-e+e[CoIII(ddbt)]+
-e+e
[CoIII(ddbt)]--e+e [CoII(ddbt)]2-
Fig. 4.4.2: Cyclic Voltammogram of 6 in MeCN solution containing 0.10M[(n-bu)4N][PF6] at 22°C and scan rates of 50, 100, 200, 400 mV/s using glassycarbon working electrode.
-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.0
E (V)
10 µ
A
Ni, Co and Zn complexes 70
iminothiobenzosemiquinonato ligands (Scheme. 4.5.1, LISQ = o-
iminothiobezosemiquinonate(1-), LAP = o-aminothiophenolate(1-), LIBQ = o-
iminothiobezoquinonate).4
For the neutral species [Ni(1LNISQ)2] (1LN
ISQ = o-
diiminobenzosemiquinonate(1-), NiII; d8 ), it has been established that within the D2h
point group, the HOMO (1b1u) and the LUMO (2b2g) correspond to the symmetric and
antisymmetric combinations of the SOMO of the free bezosemiquinonate (1-) ligand. The
HOMO-LUMO transition 1b1u -2b2g corresponds to a LLCT band and no other LMCT
[NiII(LAP)(LIBQ)]*
Excited singlet state
[NiII(LISQ)2]h.ν
(S=0), µ=0 (S=0), µ≠0
Scheme. 4.5.1
Singlet ground state
hν
Fig. 4.5.1: Electronic absorption spectra of 5, 5a, 5b and 5c in CH2Cl2 solution (0.10M [(n-Bu)4N] PF6) at –5 °C.
500 1000 1500 20000.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5 [Ni(ddbt)]1+ (5a) [Ni(ddbt)] (5) [Ni(ddbt)]1- (5b) [Ni(ddbt)]2- (5c)
ε X1
04 M-1 c
m-1
λ (nm)
5
5a
5b
5c
Chapter 4 71
band is observed in the visible region. Upon one electron oxidation (species 5a), the
former HOMO 1b1u (π*) becomes SOMO, which cannot mix with d-orbitals of the nickel
ion due to symmetry reason.5 Thus, the spectrum of the 5a exhibits an intense absorption
at 840 nm (ε = 2 × 104 mol-1 cm-1) which may be assign as an intraligand π-π *charge
transfer band of a coordinated o-iminothiobezoquinonato ligand, (LIBQ). In addition a
broad absorption at ≈ 1100 nm is observed with ε = 7000 M-1cm-1 which is assigned as an
intervalence charge transfer band (IVCT), and which confirms ligand mixed valency.
Thus, an electronic structure of type [NiII (LISQ)(LIBQ)]+ with S=1/2 ground state is
proposed for 5a.
The spectrum of monoanion (5b) shows an intense absorption band at 910
nm (ε = 1.5 × 104 M-1 cm-1) and a weak absorption band at 700 nm. In this case, the
former LUMO (2b2g) becomes the SOMO, which has ~15% Ni 3dxz character, thus the
transition 1b1u-2b2g is spin and dipole allowed and represents ligand-to-ligand
intervalence charge transfer band (LLIVCT). The nature of these bands in 5b suggest the
presence of at least one radical ligand as in the [NiII(LISQ)(LIP)]-. 5b also shows a broad
charge transition band in the near infrared region (1750 nm, ε = 6 × 103 mol-1 cm-1),
which corresponds to IVCT of the type as shown in Scheme 4.5.2.
In the spectrum of the dianionic species (5c), both of these strong LLCT and IVCT bands
are quenched, confirming the presence of the dianionic o-imidothiophenolato (LIP) forms
of the ligand. The spectral and electrochemical behavior so confirms that the redox
activity of this complex is predominantly ligand based as shown in Scheme. 4.4.1.
The electronic spectrum of neutral 6 (Fig. 4.5.2) shows a broad ligand-to-ligand charge
transfer band (LLCT) in the near infrared at 1400 nm (ε = 4.2 ×103 M-1 cm-1) similar to
the one observed for [Ni(ddbt)]1- (5b), suggesting that the origin of this band is the same
as in the [Ni(ddbt)]1- species. This broad band in the near infrared region is absent in the
spectra of the monocation (6a), the monoanion (6b) and dianion (6c). The spectra of
monoanion (6b) and monocation (6a) present similar features: In the spectrum of the 6b,
[NiII(LPhISQ)(Lph
IP)] [NiII(LPhIP)](LPh
ISQ)] Scheme 4.5.2
Ni, Co and Zn complexes 72
an absorption band at 550 nm with an extinction coefficient of, ε = 1.5 × 104 M-1cm-1 and
a weak absorption at 680 nm (ε = 1 × 104 M-1cm-1) are present, while 6a displays a strong
absorption band at 600 nm (ε =1 .5 × 104 mol-1cm-1) and a weaker band at 780 nm (ε =1 ×
104 mol-1cm-1). This pattern is very similar to the spectrum of [CoIII(LNSIP)2]- (1) (chapter
2), where they were assigned as ligand to metal (LMCT) bands. In the spectrum of the
dianionic species (6c), both of these strong LLCT and LMCT bands are quenched.
The electronic spectrum of [Zn(pdbt)2] (7) (Fig. 4.5.3) was recorded in
dichloromethane. It exhibits a transition at 450 nm (ε = 3000 M-1cm-1), which is likely a
LMCT band.
Fig. 4.5.2: Electronic spectra of 6, 6a, 6c and 6c in CH2Cl2 solution (0.10M)[(n-Bu)4N] PF6 at –5 °C.
400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 18000
1
1
2
3
3
4
5 [Co(ddbt)] (6) [Co(ddbt)]- (6b) [Co(ddbt)]+ (6a) [Co(ddbt)]2- (6c)
ε M
-1cm
-1X
104
λ nm
6
6b
6a
6c
Chapter 4 73
4.6 X-band EPR spectra and magnetic susceptibility
X-band EPR spectra and magnetic susceptibility data were recorded for 5,
5a, 6, 7, 5b and 6b. As expected compounds 5 and 7 were diamagnetic. X-band EPR
spectra of the 5b and 5a in frozen CH2Cl2 solutions at 10 K is shown below in Fig 4.6.1
and Fig. 4.6.2, respectively. Both of these spectra are indicative of an S = ½ ground state.
The EPR spectrum of 5b displays a rhombic signal with anisotropic g values (gx = 2.124,
gy = 2.024, gz = 1.997), whereas 5a shows an isotropic EPR signal at giso = 1.9968. These
spectra closely resemble those reported for analogous monoanionic and monocationic
species in the literature.4,21
As mentioned in the introduction of this chapter, two controversial
approaches have been discussed in the literature25 about the observed g anisotropies for
the [Ni(H2dma)]1- and similar complexes. Holm et al.12 believed that in such complexes
the large g value anisotropies can be explained by considering NiIII (d7) configuration,
with appreciable admixture of d orbitals of metal in the wave function of an odd electron.
Fig. 4.5.3: Electronic absorption spectrum of the neutral 7 in CH2Cl2 at 22°C.
400 500 6000
1
2
3
4
[Zn(phbt)2]
ε Μ
−1 c
m−1
X 1
03
λ nm
Ni, Co and Zn complexes 74
On the contrary, Gray et al.11 believe that the monoanion can de described as NiII (d8),
coordinated to monoradical ligand and that the anisotropy in the g tensor is a
consequence of the larger spin-orbit coupling. Indeed, previous DFT calculations in our
group21,22 have shown that, [MII(LISQ)2] complexes are singlet diradical species and that
the monoanionic species contain one coordinated ligand π radical. In the neutral species,
the two molecular orbitals shown in Fig. 4.6.3 are highest in energy. These two MOs are
the symmetric and antisymmetric combination of the singly occupied molecular orbital
(SOMO) of the free semiquinonate ligand. In the neutral species, two electrons occupy
the two close lying au and bg orbitals. In the monocation, the ground state is 2Au with the
au MO in fig. 4.6.3, containing a single unpaired electron. Due to symmetry reasons, the
au orbital cannot mix with any metal d orbital. Consequently metal hyperfine coupling
cannot be expected and is not observed experimentally. The lack of metal character in the
au SOMO causes mixing of the excited states with the ground state to be inefficient, and
therefore, g anisotropy is expected to be very small in agreement with the experiment.
Fig. 4.6.1: X band EPR spectra of 5b Exp : T = 9.94 K, ν = 9.52GHz , P = 1.0060 x 10-4 mW , MA = 10 G
300 320 340 360
dχ"/d
B
B [mT]
2.3 2.2 2.1 2 1.9
Experimental
Simulated
g-factor
gx = 2.13 gy = 2.024 gz = 1.997
Chapter 4 75
In contrast, in the monoanion, two electrons occupy the au orbital and the
bg orbital is the SOMO. As this orbital can mix with the metal d orbitals, it acquires some
metal character. Since the ground state 2Bg mixes with low-lying d-d states, it has a
sizable orbital angular momentum, which manifests itself experimentally in g anisotropy.
M
a1u
b2g
Fig. 4.6.3: HOMOs of [ML2]0, [ML2]1-, and [ML2]1+
Fig. 4.6.2: X band EPR spectra of 5a Exp : T = 9.94 K, ν = 9.52 GHz , P = 1.0060 x 10-4 mW , MA = 10 G
280 320 360 400
dχ"/d
B
B [mT]
2.6 2.4 2.2 2 1.8 1.6
g-factor
Experimental
Simulated
giso = 1.997
Ni, Co and Zn complexes 76
Magnetic susceptibility data of 5b was collected in the temperature range from 2 to 290
K. This data is shown below in Fig. 4.6.4 as µeff vs. temperature. It shows a temperature
independent magnetic moment of 1.70 µB corresponding to an S = 1/2 ground state.
Following simulation parameters yield the best fit of experimental data: g = 2.049, χTIP =
0.343*10-4 emu mol-1, θ = -0.596 K, where g value is kept fix from the EPR spectrum
parameters.
The X-band EPR spectrum for the neutral complex 6 is shown in Fig.
4.6.5. The monocation (6a) and the monoanion (6b) are both EPR silent. 6 shows a
rhombic EPR signal with following simulation parameters: gx = 2.0160, gy = 2.0457 and
gz = 2.7022, and a hyperfine coupling of the unpaired electron with the 59Co nucleus (I =
7/2) is observed with Axx = 18.00, Ayy = 0, and Azz = 28.36G. These spectrum and fitting
parameters closely resemble to those reported for [Co(2LN)2],13 (2LN represents o-
phenylenediamine) where the simulation parameters are as following : gx = 1.9906, gy =
2.058, gz = 2.8100 with 59Co hyperfine coupling constants Axx= 24.0, Ayy = 0, Azz= 42 G.
0 50 100 150 200 2500,0
0,4
0,8
1,2
1,6
2,0
µ eff/µ
B
T/K
Fig. 4.6.4: Plot of µeff vs. temperature for 5b. The solid line represents thebest least squares fitting for the experimental data (squares).
µeff = 1.73 µB g = 2.049 χTIP = 0.343×10-4 emu mol-1
θ = -0.596 K
Chapter 4 77
The observed g values in the spectrum clearly show that the unpaired
electron must be located on the metal d orbital, which can be achieved by two possible
ways: 1) A square-planar low spin CoII (d7) complex possessing a SCo=1/2 ground state.
Similar simulation parameters have been reported for other related complexes.23 2)
Alternatively, a CoIII (d6) ion in a square-planar ligand field possessing an SCo=1 local
spin. This may allow antiferromagnetic exchange coupling within the radical ligand to
give a SCo =1/2 ground state. It is not possible to discern between these two possibilities
using only EPR spectroscopy. However, based on the X-ray structure analysis, the bond
distances in the ligand point towards the second possibility i.e. CoIII (d6), assignment to
the central metal.
6 shows a temperature independent magnetic moment of 1.93 µB
corresponding to an S = 1/2 ground state (Fig. 4.6.6, g = 2.28 (fixed from EPR
parameters), χTIP = 0.3*10-4 emu mol-1, θ = -0.119 K). It is still not possible to discern
between the above mentioned two possibilities for the S = 1/2 ground state from magnetic
susceptibility measurements.
Fig. 4.6.5- X band epr spectrum of 6 exp:T = 9.90 K, ν = 9.64 GHz , P = 6.3462 x 10-5 mW, MA = 10 G
240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380
Experimental
Simulated
dχ"
/dT
B [mT]
2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2 1.8g-factor
gx = 1.9906 gy = 2.058 gz = 2.8100
Ni, Co and Zn complexes 78
The compound 6b is EPR silent but shows a temperature independent
magnetic moment of 3.0 µB corresponding to S = 1 ground state (Fig. 4.6.7, g = 2.15, χTIP
= 0.277×10-4 emu mol-1, D = 37.0 cm-1). The zero-field splitting of a high magnitude, D =
|36| cm1- is known for the CoIII spin triplet compounds.19 Taking into account these
parameters and previous data, the ground state of 6b can be assigned as CoIII (d6), which
in turn confirms the CoIII, physical oxidation state for the cobalt center for compound 6
assuming ligand centered reduction takes place. The sign of D was determined from
variable field / variable temperature measurements and spin Hamiltonian simulations of
the experimental data (Fig. 4.6.8). The best fit of the magnetization behaviour is obtained
for D = +31 cm-1, g = 2.1, E/D= -0.385.
Fig.4.6.6: Plot µeff vs. µB for 6. The solid line represents the best least squaresfitting for the experimental data (squares).
50 100 150 200 250
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
µ eff/
µ Β
T/K
µeff = 1.93 µB g = 2.28 χTIP = 0.3×10-4 emu mol-1
θ = -0.119 K
Chapter 4 79
Fig. 4.6.7: Plot µeff vs. µB for 6b. The solid line represents the bestleast squares fitting for the experimental data (squares).
0 50 100 150 200 250
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
µ ef
f / µ
B
T / K
µeff = 3 µB g = 2.15 χTIP = 0.277×10-4 emu mol-1
D = 37.0 cm-1
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Mm
ol/N
gβ
βH/kT
1 T
4 T
7 T
Figure 4.6.8: Magnetization measurements at 1, 4 and 7 T for complex 6b. Thesolid lines represent the simulation. (D = +31 cm-1, g = 2.1)
Ni, Co and Zn complexes 80
Far-infrared transmission spectrum for complex 6b has been measured
over the frequency range of 10-50 cm-1. The measurements were performed at variable
fields in order to distinguish the electronic transition bands from the normal phonon
bands. The temperature was kept constant at 1.8 K and the field was varied from 0 to 7 T.
A very sharp band (1 cm-1 width) is observed at 36.67 cm-1, which is found to be field
dependent. Whereas all other bands remain unaffected on application of the magnetic
field, the band at 36.67 cm-1 moves to higher frequency with increasing field strength
(Fig. 4.6.9), and hence, clearly arises from a low-frequency electronic transition
(Fig.2.7.4, chapter 1). The D value obtained from the susceptibility measurements (37
cm-1) is in agreement with zero field splitting parameter obtained from the far-infrared
spectrum. Thus, compound 6 possesses a spin triplet ground state with a zero field
splitting of +36.67 cm-1.
Fig. 4.6.9: Far-infrared transmission spectrum of 6b at 1.8 K and at fields varied between 0 and 7 T.
34 35 36 37 38
0 T 1 T 2 T 3 T 4 T 5 T 6 T 7 T
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 451E-3
0.01
0.1
1
Tr
Chapter 4 81
4.7 Conclusions
In this study, the crystal structures properties as well as the
electrochemical, spectroscopic and magnetic behavior of 5, 6, 7, 5b and 6b have been
fully characterized. As pointed out in the introduction, it has been verified that the metal
ions in analogous tetra coordinated cobalt and nickel complexes exist in different
oxidation levels; by low temperature crystallography of 5, 6, 5b and 6b . Thus, in the
neutral and monoanionic nickel complexes, 5 and 5b the central nickel has a NiII (d8)
electron configuration, where the HOMO are predominantly ligand centered. On the other
hand, in the case of the neutral cobalt complex (6), the observed ligand bond lengths
clearly suggest a CoIII (d6) electron configuration. In the monoanion 6b, the ligand bond
distances indicate dianionic form of ligands leading to a spin triplet ground state for 6b.
Even though the DFT calculations on the similar compounds suggest the two possibilities
namely: CoIII (d6), or CoII (d7) coordinated to ligand radical, the structural features of 6b
point toward CoIII (d6) configuration. The degeneracy of the ground state of 6b is lifted
by large positive zero field splitting of 36.67 cm-1, which has been measured
independently by magnetic moment measurement, variable-temperature and variable
field, and far-infrared absorption.
The absorption spectra of the neutral and electrochemically-generated species show
several charge transfer bands. Intense LLCT bands occurring in the visible region are a
significant feature of the spectra of complexes containing two radical ligands. Spectra of
complexes containing only one radical ligand contain IVCT bands in the near infrared
region. The EPR parameters for 6 and 5b show that the spin-orbit coupling plays a role in
the deviation of g value from free radical value. These radical stabilized complexes have
proved the noninnocent nature of the o-aminothiophenolate ligands, thus disproving the
proposed valence isomer structure in the literature,12,14 for the proper assignment of
oxidation level of ligand.
Ni, Co and Zn complexes 82
4.8 References
1) Larkworthy, L. F.; Murphy, J. M.; Phillips, D. J. Inorg. Chem. 1968, 7, 1436
2) Liaw, M. -C.; Lee, G. -H.; Peng, S. -M. Bull. Inst. Chem. Academia Sinica, 1993,
40, 23
3) Hsieh, C. -H.; Hsu, I. -J.; Lee, C. -M.; Ke, S. -C.; Wang, T. -Y.; Lee, G. -H.;
Chen, J. -M.; Lee, J. -F.; Liaw, W. F. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 3925.
4) Herebian, D.; Bothe, E.; Bill, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 10012.
5) (a) Bachler, V.; Olbrich, G.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41,
4179. (b) Herebian, D.; Wieghardt, K.; Neese, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
10997. (c) Herebian, D.; Bothe, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9116.
6) Thompson, M. C.; Busch, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 3651.
7) Elder, M. S.; Prinz, G. M.; Thornton, P.; Busch, D. H. Inorg. Chem. 1968, 7,
2426.
8) Stiefel, E. I.; Waters, J. H.; Billig, E.; Gray, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87,
3016.
9) Holm, R. H.; Balch, A. L.; Davison, A. A.; Maki, H.; Berry, T. E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1967, 89, 2866.
10) Ghosh, P.; Bill, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K., J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 1293.
11) Dori, Z.; Eisenberg, R.; Stiefel, E. I.; Gray, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92,
1506
12) (a) Balch, A. L.; Holm, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 5201. (b) Holm, R. H.
Progress. Inorg. Chem. 1971, 14, 241
13) Bill, E.; Bothe, E.; Chaudhuri, P.; Chlopek, C.; Herebian, D.; Kokatam, S.; Ray,
K.; Weyhermüller, T.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 204.
14) Kawamoto, T.; Kuma, H.; Kushi, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1997, 70, 1599.
15) Kochin, S. G.; Garnovskii, A. D.; Kogan, V. A.; Osipov, O. A.; Sushko, T. G.
Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 1969, 14, 748.
16) Corbin, J. L.; Work, D. E. Can. J. Chem. 1974, 52, 1054.
Chapter 4 83
17) Yamamura, T.; Tadokoro, M.; Hamaguchi, M.; Kuroda, R. Chem. Lett. 1898,
1481.
18) López-Torres, E.; Mendiola, M. A.; Pastor, C. J.; Pérez, B. S. Inorg. Chem. 2004,
43, 5222.
19) (a) van der Put, P. J.; Schilperoord, A. A. Inorg. Chem. 1974, 13, 2476. (b) Ray,
K.; Begum, A.; Weyhermüller, T.; Piligkos, S.; Slageren, J. V.; Neese, F.;
Wieghardt, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4403.
20) Holm, R. H.; Balch, A. L.; Davison, A. A.; Maki, H.; and Berry, T. E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 2866.
21) (a) Sun, X.; Chun, H.; Hildenbrand, K.; Bothe, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Neese, F.;
Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 4295. (b) Min, K. S.; Weyhermüller, T.;
Bothe, E.; and Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 2922.
22) Herebian, D.; Wieghardt, K.; Neese, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10997.
23) Daul, C.; Schläpfer, C. W.; Zelewski, A. V. Struct. Bonding, 1979, 36, 12.
24) (a) Corwin, D. T.; Koch, S. A. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 493. (b) Hu, W. J.; Barton,
D.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 1170. (c) Kawamoto, T.; Kushi, Y.
J. Chem. Soc., Dal. Trans. 1992, 3137.
25) (a) Schmitt, R. D.; Maki, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2288. (b) Maki, A.
H.; Berry, T. E.; Davison, A.; Holm, R. H.; Balch, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966,
88, 1080. (c) Maki, A. H.; Edelstein, N.; Davison, A.; Holm, R. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1964, 86, 4580
.
84
Chapter 5 85
5.1 Introduction
As it is known that the sulfur donors are essential constituents of the
coordination spheres of transition metals that form the active centers of numerous
oxidoreductases such as hydrogenases or nitrogenases,1 four and six coordinate
complexes with sulfur donor ligands have been studied in detail for many years.2
Recently the non-innocent nature of S,S'-coordinated benzene-1,2-ditholato(2-) ligands
has been established on the basis of crystallography as well as magnetic and
spectroscopic features in a series of square-planar complexes, where different redox
forms of the ligand exhibit different structural features (scheme 1.1.4 (chapter1), and
scheme 5.1.1).3 Taking into account the ligand centered redox activity observed in these
four coordinate complexes, six coordinate compounds are also expected to show similar
redox behavior. However, the redox properties of such compounds reported so far are
vague.
Chapter 5 Cr complexes of
3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-benzenedithiol and
3,6-di-tert-butyl-catacholate
Scheme 5.1.1
S
S
-e+e
-e+e
(tLSS)2- (tLSS)1- (tLSS)0
MS
SM
S
SM
Cr complexes 86
Maki et al. have reported the synthesis and characterization of series of
tris-(o-benzenedithiolato)chromium complexes: [(C6H5)4As][CrS6C6(CF3)6],
[(C6H5)4As]2[CrS6C6(CN)6], [(C6H5)4As]3[CrS6C6(CN)6].4 In this series the +5 and +6
oxidation states were claimed to the monoanionic and to the neutral compound,
respectively. Nevertheless, except for the structure of [(NEt4)2][Cr(S2C6Cl4)3],5 no
square-planar or octahedral chromium complex coordinated by o-benzenedithiolato
ligands have been structurally characterized. Therefore, we aim to synthesize [Cr(tLSS)3]n
(n = 0, -1) complexes (tLSS = 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-benzenedithiol), which is reported here
with the X-ray crystallographic and spectroscopic characterizations. XAS studies are
reported in chapter 7.
Attempts to synthesize tris-(o-toluenedithiolato)chromium complex have
been reported to lead to the formation of [(n-C4H9)4N][CrVO(tdt)2], which was
characterized by an isotropic epr signal at g = 1.994. In our efforts to synthesize tris-
(tLss)3-chromium, [(n-C4H9)4N][CrVO(tLSS)2] was also the result. Characterization and X-
ray structure analysis of this compound is discussed in this chapter. The preparation of
stable CrV compounds is of considerable importance. The presence of oxochromium bond
(O=Cr) is the most common feature of the metal in this higher oxidation state. However,
the chemistry associated with it is largely unexplored. The possibility of effecting a direct
transfer of the oxygen atom from the O=Cr functionality to a donor such as olefin
(scheme 5.1.2) poses an interesting challenge, which has been realized with series of CrV
complexes.6
Roćek et al.7 have reported a first stable crystalline chromium (V)
compound, potassium bis(2-hydroxy-2-methylbutyrato)oxochromate (V) monohydrate,
K[OCr(O2CCOMeEt)2]ּH2O. Afterwards, Groves and Kruper achieved a oxochromium
C C + M
O
C C
O
+ M
Scheme 5.1.2
Chapter 5 87
(V) derivative of chloro(tetraphenylporphyrinato)chromium(III), which was capable of
hydroxylating and epoxidizing hydrocarbons under catalytic and stoichiometric
conditions.8 Synthesis of various oxochromium(V) cations ligated with salen [N,N’-
ethylenebis(salicylideneaminato)], i.e. O=Cr(salen)+ was reported in the literature.9,10 A
series of chromium(V) model complexes that mimic the binding of Cr(V) to peptide
backbone have been prepared and reported.11 Relatively stable Cr(V/IV)–ehba (ehbaH2 =
2-ethyl-2-hydroxybutanoic acid) complexes are extensively used as models for
understanding the Cr(V/IV) reactions with biomolecules.12 In this regard our compound
which contains Cr=O bond along with S,S'-coordinated benzene dithiolene environment
is very interesting.
The non-innocent nature of O, O'-coordinated o-benzoquinone ligands was
well established in the series of tris(quinone) complexes of Cr, Mn, Fe, Co etc.13 Three
different oxidation levels of O,O'-coordinated o-benzoquinone can be unequivocally
identified by the structural parameters of these compounds as shown in schemes 5.1.3
and 1.1.3(chapter1).
The reaction between an o-benzoquinone and Cr(CO)6 has been reported
to give tris(quinone) complexes of general form CrQ3.14, 15 The view of these complexes
as consisting of radical SQ (semiquinone) ligands coordinated to CrIII, [CrIII(SQ•)3], is
based on the observation of diamagnetic behavior and structural features. The spins of the
radical ligands couple antiferromagnetically with the metal dπ (t2g3) electrons that show
diamagnetic behavior.14,16 Mössbauer spectra recorded on the related complexes of iron,
[FeIII(SQ•)3],17 verify that the metal ion is in the form of high spin FeIII. Electrochemical
Scheme 5.1.3
O
O
-e+e
-e+e
(tLCat)2-(tLSQ)1- (tLBQ)0
MO
OM
O
OM
Cr complexes 88
characterization of the [CrIII(SQ•)3] series have shown three membered oxidation and
reduction series. This, with other structural, magnetic and spectral properties obtained for
various members of the redox series, has led to the view that the redox couples are ligand
based, with the metal remaining in the form of CrIII through the series.15,18 Structural
features of the members of the reduction series support this view by having the metal-
oxygen bond lengths of typical CrIII, and the structural features of the quinone ligands
support the catecholate and semiquinonate charges of [CrIII(Cat)3]3-, [CrIII(Cl4SQ)3], and
[CrIII(3,5-DBSQ)3] (DBSQ = di-tert-butyl-semiquinonato).15,19,20 Nevertheless a recent
report on the electronic structure of K[Cr(3,5-DBQ)3] concludes that the Cr is in the +5
oxidation state, with the ligands all being catecholate.21 This view, which was based on
the position and intensity of the Cr-K-edge and pre edge peaks in the X-ray absorption
spectrum, is contradictory to the established non-innocent nature of o-benzeoquinone
ligands. In this regard we have synthesized a six coordinated [Cr(tLcat)3] (tLcat = 3,6 di-
tert-butyl-catacholate) and characterized it thoroughly by X-ray structure analysis, and
spectroscopy. The related XAS results are reported in chapter 7.
5.2 Synthesis and characterization
[N(n-bu)4][Cr(tLss)3] (8)
To obtain a compound, to a solution of the ligand 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-
benzenedithiol H2[tLSS] in MeCN, CrCl3(THF)3 was added followed by the addition of
Et3N under anaerobic conditions. After 1 h, [N(n-bu)4]Br was added and air was passed
through this solution for 10 minutes. Violet crystals of 8 were obtained from the solution
at low temperature (-200C). Infrared spectrum of this compound shows an intense peak at
1108 cm-1 corresponding to C-S•. The 8i, having [As(Ph)4] as countercation was prepared
in the similar way by using [As(Ph)4]Br instead of [N(n-bu)4]Br.
[As(Ph)4] [CrO(tLss)2] (9)
When a solution of 8i was exposed to air for a long time (6-7 hours), the
color of the solution changed from violet to red brown and upon evaporation of solvent,
Chapter 5 89
red-brown crystals were obtained. This compound shows an intense peak in its infrared
spectrum at 967cm-1, corresponding to a Cr=O stretch.
[Cr(tLcat)3] (10)
To a solution of the ligand 3,6-di-tert-butyl-catacholate in MeCN,
CrCl3(THF)3 was added, followed by the addition of Et3N. The reaction mixture was
heated for 1 hour in air. Crystalline 10 was obtained by the slow evaporation of solvent.
The IR spectrum of this compound shows sharp bands at 1432 and 1416 cm-1,
characteristic of the SQ ligand.16
[Co(Cp)2][Cr(tLcat)3] (10b)
To a deep red-brown solution of 10 in CH2Cl2, cobaltocene was added
under anaerobic conditions. A blue precipitate formed was isolated by filtration and
washed with diethyl ether.
5.3 Molecular structures
The crystal structures of compounds 8, 9, and 10 at 100(2) K have been
determined using Mo Kα radiation.
The crystal structure of 8 consists of discrete [Cr(tLss)3]1- anions and
[N(n-bu)4]1+ cations. 8 crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system with a space group
P21/c. The units of [Cr(tLss)3]- and [N(n-bu)4]+ are well separated from each other by a
distance of 8.24 (4) Å, in which the Cr ions adopt a distorted octahedral geometry. The
coordination sphere of the chromium is composed of three bidentate ligands. The ligands
coordinate through the deprotonated sulfur atoms. Intermolecular interactions in the
crystal are weak, due to the large tert-butyl groups, which preclude the π-stacking
interactions. A schematic representation of the bond lengths and angles for the three
independent o-benzodithiolene rings and S-Cr-S planes are displayed in Fig. 5.3.1. The
average S-Cr-S angle of 84.37(5)° is less than the ideal 90° angle for an octahedron. The
dihedral angles between the planes of the o-dithiolene rings and the S-Cr-S planes are
12.9, 23.6 and 6.5° for rings one through three, respectively. The o-benzodithiolene rings
are almost planar; the mean deviation from the planes being 0.0088, 0.0174, and 0.0147
Cr complexes 90
Å for one to three planes respectively. The thermal ellipsoid plot of anion in 8 with atom
labeling scheme is shown in Fig. 5.3.2 and table 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 display the relevant bond
angles and distances respectively.
One descriptor of distortion in the tris-chelate complexes is the chelate
projection (twist) angle.16 These angles should be 0˚ in the trigonal prismatic limit and
60˚ in the octahedral limit. The individual values observed here are Ф(S(1), Cr, S(2)) =
46.0˚, Ф(S(21), Cr, S(22)) = 37.7˚, and Ф(S(41), Cr, S(42)) = 33.7˚. The mean S-M-S
angle involving trans sulfur atoms is 136 ± 1˚ in known trigonal prismatic structures.4,5,9
The mean value of 162.55(6) observed in 8 is much closer to octahedral geometry.
The average Cr-S distances of 2.299(5) Å are in agreement with the
reported distances for S-CrIII.22 The average C-S bond distance of 1.750 ± 0.001 Å is
intermediate between typical single and double bond lengths. In square-planar complexes
containing two radical ligands, the C-S• distance is in between 1.723 ± 0.01 Å and 1.731
± 0.01 Å (3σ). In the compounds, containing one radical ligand and one dianionic ligand,
this distance is in the range of 1.744 ± 0.015 to 1.752 ± 0.015 Å (scheme 1.1.4, chapter
1). Since 8 is an octahedral complex with three ligands, if one ligand is a radical ligand
and the other two are dianionic, the average C-S bond distance is expected to show
almost single bond character (C-S = 1.755 ± 0.01 to 1.77± 0.01 Å). On the other hand, if
all three of the ligands are radical ligands then the average C-S bond length should show
double bond character with C-S• distance of ∼1.723 ± 0.01 Å. Consequently, the
structural features of 8 suggest the presence of two radical ligands and one dianionic
ligand, the average C-S distance (1.750 ± 0.001 Å) being intermediate of single and
Fig. 5.3.1: Schematic presentation of the bond distances and angles for 8.
S(2)(1)S
Cr
S(22)(21)S
Cr
S(42)(41)S
Cr
2.283
(1)
2.290(1)
2.291(5)2.303
(1)
2.301
(1) 2.327(1)
1.754(5)
1.74
6(5)
1.756(5)
1.75
3(5)
1.757(5)
1.73
8(5)
1.408(7)
1.411(7)
1.401
(7)
1.363(7)
1.410(7)
1.397
(7)
1.412(7)
1.422(7)1.39
9(7)
1.38
5(7)
1.374(7)
1.404(7)
1.406(7)
1.432(7)1.40
9(7)
1.364(7)
1.408(7)
1.386
(7)
84.49(5) 84.37(5)83.85(5)
di. Angle12.9
di. Angle23.6
di. Angle6.5
Chapter 5 91
double bond lengths leading to the assignment of +3 (d3, S = ½) oxidation state to the
chromium. It is known from square-planar complexes containing one radical ligand and
one dianionic ligand, that the charge is delocalized over the ligands and the assignment of
redox states of individual ligands is difficult.23 In 8 also the three ligands show nearly
identical features in bond distances, thus disallowing the assignment of redox states of
individual ligands unequivocally. Along with these characteristic C-S bond distances, the
phenyl rings of the ligand exhibit distortions typical of quinoid type structures, namely
two shorter C=C and four longer ones (1.372(7) and 1.408(7) Å), also indicating the
presence of radical ligands.
Bond angles (deg) S(1) -Cr(1)-S(2) 84.49(5) S(1) -Cr(1)-S(21) 163.11(6) S(21) -Cr(1)-S(22) 83.85(5) S(2) -Cr(1)-S(41) 164.97(6) S(42) -Cr(1)-S(41) 84.37(3) S(42) -Cr(1)-S(22) 159.58(6)
Cr(1)S(1)
S(2)
C(1)
C(2)
C(3)C(4)
C(5)
C(6)S(22)S(21)
S(42)
S(41)
Fig. 5.3.2: A thermal ellipsoid plot of the anion in 8 at the 50% probability level with atom labeling scheme.
Table 5.3.1: Selected bond angles [deg] for 8
Cr complexes 92
Fig. 5.3.3 shows the thermal ellipsoid plot of the anion in 9 with atom
labeling scheme and table 5.3.3 displays the relevant bond distances and bond angles.
The structure consists of anions of [CrO(tLss)2]- and [As(Ph)4]+ cations arranged in the
monoclinic crystal system. The chromium atom is bonded to an oxo group and two
bidentate 3,5-di-tert-butylbenzenedithiolate ligands through deprotonated sulfur atoms.
The geometry about the Cr atom is distorted square pyramidal. The deviation from the
square pyramidal geometry lies in the difference between the angles S(1)-Cr(1)-S(21)=
140.07(11)° and S(2)-Cr(1)-S(22) = 145.99(11)° which then yields τ = 0.098°, (a perfect
pyramidal yields τ = 0) where τ is determined by the formula τ = (β-α)/60 (where β and
α are the two largest S-Cr-S angles in degrees).24 There is a disorder in the Cr and O
atoms making the bond distances less relevant. The five membered chelate rings are
almost planar, the average deviation from planes being 0.0097 Å. The Cr(1) atom is
displaced above the square plane defined by four sulfur atoms by 0.720 Å. The Cr(1)-
O(1) distance of 1.572(7) Å is ~0.02 Å longer than those reported 7,10,25 for CrV-O double
bonds. The Cr(1)-S average distance of 2.274(2) Å is less than that observed in 8
(2.2994(5)), where chromium has a +3 oxidation state. The average C-S (1.786 ± 0.02Å)
bond distance indicates single bond character and the six C-C bonds of the aromatic ring
are equidistant within the 3σ error (1.390± 0.02 Å). Thus, both of the ligands are o-
Bond Distance [Å] Cr(1)-S(1) 2.283(1) Cr(1)-S(21) 2.301(1) Cr(1)-S(41) 2.304(1) Cr(1)-S(2) 2.290(1) Cr(1)-S(22) 2.327(1) Cr(1)-S(42) 2.291(1) S(1)-C(1) 1.754(5) S(21)-C(21) 1.756(5) S(41)-C(41) 1.757(5) S(2)-C(2) 1.746(5) S(22)-C(22) 1.753(5) S(42)-C(42) 1.738(5) C(1)-C(2) 1.408(7) C(21)-C(22) 1.412(7) C(41)-C(42) 1.406(7) C(1)-C(6) 1.411(7) C(21)-C(26) 1.422(7) C(41)-C(46) 1.432(7) C(2)-C(3) 1.401(7) C(22)-C(23) 1.399(7) C(42)-C(43) 1.409(7) C(3)-C(4) 1.363(7) C(23)-C(24) 1.374(7) C(43)-C(44) 1.364(7)
C(4)-C(5) 1.410(7) C(24)-C(25) 1.404(7) C(44)-C(45) 1.408(7)
C(5)-C(6) 1.397(7) C(25)-C(26) 1.385(7) C(45)-C(46) 1.386(8)
Table 5.3.2: Selected distances [Å] for 8
Chapter 5 93
benzodithiolate (2-) dianions that in together with dianionic oxygen leads to (+5)
oxidation state to the chromium. As there are no structural evidences of CrV complexes
coordinated to sulfur ligands, this complex is a unique model in this case.
Bond Distance [Å] Bond angles (deg) Cr(1)-O(1) 1.572(7) Cr(1)-S(21) 2.267(2) O(1)-Cr(1)-S(21) 112.5(3) Cr(1)-S(1) 2.278(3) Cr(1)-S(22) 2.274(2) O(1)-Cr(1)-S(22) 107.2(7) Cr(1)-S(2) 2.276(3) S(21)-C(21) 1.759(8) O(1)-Cr(1)-S(2) 106.8(3) S(1)-C(1) 1.787(8) S(22)-C(22) 1.758(8) O(1)-Cr(1)-S(1) 107.3(3) S(2)-C(2) 1.785(8) C(21)-C(22) 1.42(1) S(22)-Cr(1)-S(2) 146.0(1) C(1)-C(2) 1.42(1) C(21)-C(26) 1.41(1) S(21)-Cr(1)-S(1) 140.1(1) C(1)-C(6) 1.40(1) C(22)-C(23) 1.39(1) S(21)-Cr(1)-S(22) 85.51(9) C(2)-C(3) 1.40(1) C(23)-C(24) 1.38(1) S(21)-Cr(1)-S(2) 81.45(9)
C(3)-C(4) 1.38(1) C(24)-C(25) 1.39(1) S(22)-Cr(1)-S(1) 84.96(9)
C(4)-C(5) 1.40(1) C(25)-C(26) 1.41(1) S(2)-Cr(1)-S(1) 85.20(1)
C(5)-C(6) 1.39(1)
Table 5.3.3: Selected bond distances [Å] and angles[deg] for 9.
Cr(1) S(21)
S(22)
C(1)
C(2)C(3)
C(4)
C(5)C(6)
S(2)
S(1)
O(1)
Fig. 5.3.3: A thermal ellipsoid plot of anion in 9 at the 50% probability level with atom labeling scheme.
Cr complexes 94
The complex 10 crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system with a space
group C2/c. The three bidentate ligands [(tLcat)] coordinate through the deprotonated
oxygen atoms and the chromium ion adopts a distorted octahedral geometry. Figure 5.3.4
shows the thermal ellipsoid plot of 10 with atom labeling scheme and table 5.3.4 and
5.3.5 display the important bond distances and bond angles, respectively. Molecule is
crystallographically symmetric.
The O(1)-Cr-O(2) angle of 81.41(9)° is less than the 90° for an ideal
octahedron. In addition, the bond angle between O(2)-Cr(1)-O(2)#1 of 177.74(14)°, that
should be 180° for an octahedron, signify a slight distortion from an octahedral geometry.
The angle C(1)-O(1)-Cr(1) (114.14 (19)°), indicate a sp2 hybridised oxygen with angle
close to 120°, that in turn indicates the C=O character with semiquinone nature of the
ligand. This is reinforced by the C-O average bond distances, which fall in the double
bond range of 1.305(4)-1.310(5) Å (Scheme 1.1.3, chapter 1). The average intra
molecular Cr-O distances of 1.936(2) Å is in agreement with the reported distances for
O-CrIII.26 In the aromatic rings of ligand, two alternate bonds are shorter (1.372 ± 0.01)
and other four are longer (1.430± 0.01). Similar distances of C-O and Cr-O bonds along
with quinoid type ring distortions are reported for [CrIII(LSQ)3] complexes containing
semiquinonate (1-) π-radical ligand suggesting a +3 oxidation state of the chromium (d3)
for 10.
Bond Distance [Å] Cr(1)-O(1) 1.929(2) C(1)-C(2) 1.440(4) Cr(1)-O(2) 1.934(2) C(1)-C(6) 1.431(4) Cr(1)-O(21) 1.947(2) C(2)-C(3) 1.433(4) O(1)-C(1) 1.310(4) C(3)-C(4) 1.372(4) O(2)-C(2) 1.305(4) C(4)-C(5) 1.420(5) O(21)-C(21) 1.303(4) C(5)-C(6) 1.372(4)
Table 5.3.4: Selected bond distances [Å] for 10
Chapter 5 95
Bond angles (deg) O(1) -Cr(1)-O(2) 81.41(9) O(21)#1-Cr(1)-O(21) 81.4(1) O(1)# -Cr(1)-O(2)#1 81.41(9) O(1)#1-Cr(1)-O(21) 169.25(9) O(1) -Cr(1)-O(21)#1 169.25(9) O(2)-Cr(1)-O(2) #1 177.7(1)
Table 5.3.5: Selected bond angles [deg] for 10
Cr(1)
O(1)
O(2)
C(1)
C(2)C(3)
C(4)
C(5)
C(6)
O(21)
O(21)#1
O(1)#1O(2)#1
Fig. 5.3.4: A thermal ellipsoid plot of 10 at the 50% probability level with atom labeling scheme.
Cr complexes 96
5.4 Electrochemistry
The Electrochemistry of 8, 9, and 10 has been studied in CH2Cl2 by cyclic
voltammetry (CV). 0.10M [N(n-Bu)4][PF6] was used as a supporting electrolyte, a glassy
carbon as working electrode and Ag/AgNO3 as reference electrode. Ferrocene was used
as internal standard, and all redox potentials are referenced versus the
ferrocenium/ferrocene (Fc+/Fc) couple at room temperature. The redox potentials (vs.
Fc+/Fc) are presented in the table 5.4.1. The cyclic voltammogram of 8 (Fig. 5.4.1) and
10 (Fig. 5.4.2) exhibit 4 and 5 membered electron transfer series, respectively. This kind
of redox processes are observed in many metallo-tris (o-benzodithiolato) 27 (M= Mo, W,
Re, Tc) and tris(o-catacholato) (M= Fe, Ru, Os, Re, Mn) complexes.28 It correspond to
species with charge of –3, -2, -1, 0, and +1. The redox potentials in general reflect the
stabilization of the more highly charged species (-2 or –3) species for 8 than 10. The
waves corresponding to reduction are reversible in both of the compounds, whereas the
oxidation processes are reversible in 10, but display irreversible character in 8.
In the case of metallo-tris (o-benzodithiolato)2 complexes, the nature of the
redox activity is vague till now, but in case of compounds of type, [M(Lcat)3] (M= Fe, Ru,
Os, Re, Mn; Lcat = 3,5 di-tert-butylcatecholate, or 3,6 di-tert-butylcatecholate)28 these
redox processes are known to be ligand centered rather than metal centered. Thus the
redox activity of 8 and 10 can be described analogously as presented in scheme 5.4.1.
Compound E11/2 (3-/2-) E2
1/2 (2-/1-) E31/2 (-1/0) E4
1/2 (0/+1) E51/2 (+1/+2)
8 -1.574 -0.944 -0.25 +0.46
9 -0.958 +0.150
10 -1.934 -1.289 -0.634 +0.578 +0.966
Table 5.4.1: Redox potentials (V) of compound 8, 9 and 10 Vs. Fc / Fc+ at 22° C.
Chapter 5 97
[CrIII(tL0SS)(tLSS)2]+
-e+e
[CrIII(tLSS)3]+e-e -e
[CrIII(LSS)2(LSS)] - +e [CrIII(LSS)(LSS)2]2-
[CrIII(tLbq)(tLsq)2]+-e+e
[CrIII(tLsq)3]+e-e -e
[CrIII(Lsq)2(LCat)] -+e [CrIII(Lsq)(LCat)2]2-
-e+e
[CrIII(tLbq)2(tLsq)]2+
Scheme 5.4.1: Redox activity of 8 and 10.
Fig. 5.4.1: Cyclic voltammogram of 8 in CH2Cl2 solution containing 0.10M [(n-bu)4N][PF6] at 22°C with scan rates of 50, 100, 200, 400, mV/s.
-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.5
10µA
E (V)
Cr complexes 98
Chronoamperometry is a technique in which current is recorded as a
function of time at a fixed applied potential. This has been proved an important technique
for bis-o-benzodithiolene complexes,3 which can be used in conjunction with
spectroscopy to monitor spectroscopic changes during oxidation or reduction. In case of
8, the changes in infrared frequency upon oxidation and one and two electron reductions
at appropriate fixed potential were monitored (Fig.5.4.3). In 8 there is a sharp band at
1106 cm-1 and a weak peak at 1041 cm-1. The strong peak at 1106 cm-1 is observed in all
metallo-bis-(o-dithiolene) complexes containing C-S• bond3 and the peak at 1039 cm-1
correspond to C-S stretching. Upon one electron oxidation (8a), the intensity of a peak at
1106 cm-1 has not change but it has shifted to frequency of 1109 cm-1. Upon one electron
reduction (8b), the intensity of the peak at 1106 cm-1 decreases, and upon two-electron
reduction (8c), this peak is totally absent with increase in the intensity of the peak at 1042
Fig. 5.4.2: Cyclic voltammogram of 10 in CH2Cl2 solution containing 0.10M [(n-bu)4N][PF6] at 22°C with scan rates of 50, 100, 200, 400, mV/s.
-2.5-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.5
10µA
E (V)
Chapter 5 99
cm-1. Thus, the peak at 1106 cm-1, characteristic of the C-S• radical, becomes less intense
after one electron reduction (8b) due to reduction of one of the radical ligands to the
dianionic form. In 8c, both of the radical ligands are reduced and no more radical ligand
is present, which is reflected in the disappearance of the peak at 1106 cm-1. The reason
for the unchanged intensity after oxidation is ambiguous. In general, these results are
consistent with the observations from the X-ray crystal structure analysis for 8, where the
C-S bond distances in the ligand illustrate the presence of two radical ligands among the
three with the remaining one having dianionic character. In 8c, the peak intensity at 1041
cm-1 is increased, which correspond to C-S single bond stretching, confirming the
assignment of these species as [CrIII(tLSS)3]3-.
The cyclic voltammogram of 9 (Fig. 5.4.4) displays two irreversible
electron transfer waves at - 0.958V (reduction) and at +0.150V (oxidation). Due to their
irreversible nature, generation of one electron oxidized or reduced species are not
possible by controlled potential coulometry.
Fig. 5.4.3: Changes in the infrared spectra upon oxidation
and reduction for 8 in the range 1250-1000 cm-1.
10001050110011501200
[Cr(LSS)3]3- (8c)
[Cr(LSS)3]2 (8b)
[Cr(LSS)3] (8a)
[Cr(LSS)3]- (8)
cm-1
1109
1106
1042
1039
1200
1202
rel.
tran
smis
sion
Cr complexes 100
5.5 Electronic absorption spectra
It was possible to generate the mono-, di- and trianionic species of 8 and
10 by coulometry at appropriate fixed potentials. The electronic absorption spectra of 8,
and 10 are displayed in Fig.5.5.1 and 5.5.2 respectively. Spectra of the neutral complexes
display one intense band at ~570 nm (ε = 2 × 104 M-1 cm-1) and two weak electronic
transitions at ~750 nm (ε = 7.5 × 103 M-1 cm-1) and ~1000 nm (ε = 5 × 103 M-1 cm-1).
This pattern in 8 and 10 does not resemble those of the corresponding metallo-tris- (o-
dithiolato) (metal = Mo, W, Re) complexes, which generally have two strong bands at
~400 nm (1.5 ×104 M-1 cm-1) and ~700 nm (2.5 × 104 M-1 cm-1), indicating a difference in
the electronic structure of 8 and 10 from other metallo-tris- (o-dithiolato) compounds,
and may indicate that the formal oxidation state of Cr in 8 and 10 is different from the
metals in other metallo-tris- (o-dithiolato) compounds. The similarity of the electronic
absorption spectra for the neutral complexes leads to the conclusion that, both of them
possess a similar electronic structure. The high-energy transitions in 8a (neutral form of
8) and 10 may correspond to the ligand to metal charge transfer (LMCT) bands. In the
Fig. 5.4.4: Cyclic Voltammogram of 9 in CH2Cl2 solution containing 0.10M [(n-bu)4N][PF6] at 22°C with scan rate of 50 mV/s using glassy carbon working electrode.
-1.4-1.2-1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.20.00.20.4
E (V)
5 µA
Chapter 5 101
mono-, and dianionic species intensity of this LMCT is decreased with the formation of a
new wide band in the near infrared region for both of 8 and 10. This is suggestive that the
electronic structure of mono-, and dianionic species of both the compounds are
correspondingly analogous. Such band has been observed for a series of complexes of
Mn and Co containing o-catecholate ligands.17, 27 These wide bands in the near infrared
region are assigned as intramolecular intervalence charge transfer band (IVCT) of
catecholate to semiquinonate. These bands suggest the presence of both forms of ligands
in these species. From the spectra, the degree of electric coupling, Hab, can be estimated
using the well-known Hush formula30 for mixed valence complexes. (eq. 5.5.1).
Where, εmax is the maximum extinction coefficient of the absorption band
in M-1 cm-1, ∆ν1/2 is the bandwidth at half εmax, νmax is the energy of the absorption in cm-
1, rL-L is the shortest distance between ligand S-S or O-O atoms. The calculated values are
similar to that observed in literature for identical Cr compounds,17 indicating strong
coupling interaction between SQ and Cat through the chromium atom (table 5.5.1).
The spectra of trianionic species do not exhibit any strong absorption band
for both 8 and 10. It is indeed possible to see the Laporte-forbidden d-d bands for CrIII in
these species. For CrIII, in an octahedral environment, splitting of the spin quartet terms is
as shown in Fig. 5.5.2. Three transitions, 4A2g→4T2g, 4A2g →4T1g (F), 4A2g →4T1g (P) are
expected in this case and are experimentally observed. From the low energy transition the
value of Dq can be estimated.
∆E (4A2g→4T2g) =10 Dq = 12,500 cm-1 (for [Cr(tLSS)3]3), and therefore Dq = 1,250 cm-1
And for [Cr(tLCat)3]3-, Dq = 1430 cm-1
Compound λmax(nm) ν max(cm-1) ε (M-1 cm-1) ν ½ (cm-1) R = dO O/S S Hab(cm-1)
8 1767 5659 3269 6878 3.001 2436
10 1700 5882 7447 1372 2.765 1817
Table 5.5.1: The IVCT band shape data and estimated Hush coupling energy Hab for 8 and 10 at 25ºC.
Hab= (2.05 x 10-2) [εmax ∆ν1/2/νmax]1/2 νmax / rLL equation 5.5.1
Cr complexes 102
Fig.5.5.1: Electronic absorption spectra of the neutral and the electrochemicallyreduced forms of [Cr(tLSS)3][N(n-bu)4] (8) in CH2Cl2 solution, (0.10M[(n-Bu)4N]PF6) at –5 0C.
400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 20000.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5ε
X 10
4 M-1
cm-1
λ (nm )
[CrIII(L•ss)3]0
[CrIII(L•ss)(Lss)2]2-
[CrIII(Lss)3]3- [CrIII(L•ss)2(Lss)]1-
Fig.5.5.2: Electronic absorption spectra of the neutral and the electrochemically reduced forms of [Cr(tLCat)3] (10) in CH2Cl2 solution, (0.10M[(n-Bu)4N] PF6) at –5 ºC.
4 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 8 0 0 2 0 0 00 .0
0 .5
1 .0
1 .5
2 .0
ε X
104 M
-1 c
m-1
λ (n m )
[Cr(III)(LSQ)( Lcat)2]2- [Cr(III)(LSQ)2( Lcat)]1-
[Cr(III)(LSQ)3]
[Cr(III)(Lcat)3]3-
Chapter 5 103
The electronic absorption spectrum of 9 is displayed in Fig. 5.5.4. It shows
two intense bands in the visible region. They are most likely the ligand to metal charge
transfer bands.
Fig.5.5.4: Electronic absorption spectra of 9 at 25ºC.
400 600 800 1000 12000
1
2
3
ε x
103 M
-1 c
m-1
λ (nm)
731
498
4F
4P
4A2g
4T2g
4T1g
4T1g
I
II
III
400 600 8000
50
100
150
ε (
M-1
cm-1
)
λ (nm)
I I
III
Fig. 5.5.3: quartet terms of 3d3 in an octahedral field, and corresponding d-d absorption spectrum of [Cr(tLcat)3]3-.
Cr complexes 104
5.6 X band EPR and magnetic susceptibility
X-band EPR spectra were recorded for 8, 9 and electrochemically
generated monocation and monoanion species of 10 in frozen CH2Cl2 solutions at 10 K.
The magnetic susceptibility data of complexes 8, 9, 10 and 10b were collected in the
temperature range 2 to 290 K. As expected compounds 8, 9 and 10b are paramagnetic
and 10 is diamagnetic. The EPR spectrum of 8 (Fig. 5.6.1) displays an axial signal with
g⊥ =1.9947, g║ = 2.0074, (S=1/2) in accord with the spin coupling model involving
antiferromagnetic coupling between two ligand based radicals and the CrIII center (S =
3/2). The EPR spectrum can also be interpreted as arising from a d1 system (CrV), or an
exchange coupled d2(CrIV)-ligand radical system. But the structural features indicate that
the CrIII exchange coupled with two ligand-based radicals is more likely model.
Moreover, unlike the sharp EPR signals that are observed for CrV, those of CrIII are
broad.31 The observed g values which are very close to free electron g value of 2.0023
indicate a small spin orbit contribution and thus the excited state are well separated from
the ground state. An estimate of spin-orbit contribution can be known from equation
5.6.1:33
where ∆xz, ∆yz, and ∆x2-y2 correspond to the energy separation between the ground state
and the indicated excited state. Knowing the value of ∆xz =12,500 cm-1, from the
electronic absorption spectra, and g value from the EPR fitting parameter, the spin-orbit
coupling value (λ) obtained is, 47.5 cm-1.
Fig. 5.6.2 displays the magnetic moment vs. temperature plot for the
complex 8. It shows a temperature independent magnetic moment of 1.72 µB at 250 K,
corresponding to spin-only value for an S=1/2 ground state (g = 1.990, χTIP = 0.17*10-3
emu mol-1, θ = -1.38 K, where g value is fixed from the parameters of EPR spectrum.).
gx = ge - 2λ/∆xz, gy = ge- 2λ/∆yz, gz = ge- 2λ/∆x2-y2 equation 5.6.1
Chapter 5 105
Fig. 5.6.1: X-band EPR spectrum of 8 Exp: T = 10.0 K, ν = 9.63 GHz, P = 6.362 x 10-4 mW, MA = 10 G
330 340 350 360-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.31.9522.05
dX"/
dB
B (mT)
Exp. Sim.
g-factor
50 100 150 200
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
µ ef
f / µ
B
T (K)
Fig. 5.6.2: Plot µeff vs. temp. for 8. The solid line represents the best least squares fitting for the experimental data (circles).
Cr complexes 106
The room temperature (298 k) X-band epr spectrum of 9 (Fig. 5.6.3) in
CH2Cl2 displays a sharp isotropic signal for (S = 1/2) with hyperfine interaction due to 53Cr (I = 3/2) nucleus. Simulation yielded following fitting parameters: giso=1.996, (Axx =
35 MHz. A similar EPR signal and hyperfine splitting parameter was observed in a CrV-
Alanine complex having a Cr = O double bond.32
The magnetization curve of 9 displays an effective magnetic moment of
1.70µB in the region of 100 to 225 K. This value corresponds to the expected spin-only
value for an S=1/2 ground state. The best fit (solid line in the Fig. 5.6.4) of the
experimental data resulted in the following parameters: gCr = 1.996, χTIP = 0.38 × 10-3
e.m.u. θ = -4.20 K, where g value is fixed from the fit-parameters of EPR spectrum.
Fig. 5.6.3: X-band EPR spectra of 9 Exp: T = 298 K, ν = 9.63 GHz, P = 6.362 x 10-4 mW, MA = 10 G
340 342 344 346 348 350-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
601.971.981.9922.012.02
dX"/
dB
B (mT)
g factor
SimulatedExperimental
Chapter 5 107
The EPR spectra of 10a (one electron oxidized form of 10, Fig. 5.6.5) and
10b (Fig. 5.6.6) displayed axial and isotropic signals respectively. The simulation of the
experimental data resulted in the following parameters, for 10a: g⊥ = 1.973, g║ = 1.984
and for 10b: giso = 1.976. Similarity in the EPR spectra of both compounds indicate that
in both of them the metal possesses an identical oxidation state that is in accord with the
spin coupling model involving antiferromagnetic coupling between two ligand based
radicals and the CrIII center (S = 3/2). The EPR spectrum can also be interpreted as arising
from a d1 system (CrV), or an exchange coupled d2(CrIV)-ligand radical system. But the
structural features point towards the CrIII exchange coupled with two ligand-based
radicals.
50 100 150 200
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8µ e
ff / µ
Β
T (K)
Fig. 5.6.4: Plot µeff vs. temp. for 9. The solid line represents the best least squares fitting for the experimental data (circles).
Cr complexes 108
342 344 346 348 350 352 354 356
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.941.961.9822.02
dX" /d
B
B (mT)
g factor
SimulatedExperimental
Fig. 5.6.6: X-band EPR spectra of 10b Exp: T = 10.04 K, ν = 9.64 GHz, P = 5.0289 x 10-3 mW, MA = 5 G
330 340 350 360 370
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
1.901.952.002.052.10
dX" /d
B
B (mT)
SimulatedExperimental
g factor
Fig. 5.6.5: X-band EPR spectra of 10a Exp T = 9.93 K, ν = 9.63 GHz, P = 1.003 x 10-3 mW, MA = 10 G
Chapter 5 109
Fig. 5.6.7 displays the magnetic moment vs. temperature plot for 10b. It
shows a temperature independent magnetic moment of 1.73 µB corresponding to spin-
only value for an S=1/2 ground state (g = 1.976, χTIP = 0.5*10-3emu, θ = -0.25 K, where g
value is fixed from the parameters of EPR spectrum.).
50 100 150 200 250
1.55
1.60
1.65
1.70
1.75
µ ef
f/ µB
T (K)
Fig. 5.6.7: Plot µeff vs. temp. for 10b. The solid line represents the best least squares fitting for the experimental data (squares).
Cr complexes 110
5.7 Conclusions
Thus we have shown in this chapter that oxidation states of higher than
+III for the central chromium ion are not present in the tris-(o-benzene-dithiolato) and
tris-(o-benzocatacholato) chromium complexes. In contrast to earlier literature reports,21
we have not found spectroscopic evidences for the occurrence of chromium(IV),
chromium(V) and chromium(VI). The electronic structures of the resulting complexes are
often complicated and were elucidated by a combination of electronic, EPR, X-ray
crystallography and magnetic susceptibility measurements.
In complex 9, chromium was found in the higher oxidation state of (+5)
which was confirmed by the epr parameters, and existence of Cr=O bond was confirmed
by the infrared spectrum and X-ray crystallography.
Chapter 5 111
5.8 References
1) (a) Müller, A.; Krebs, B. Sulfur, its significance for chemistry, for Geo, Bio and
cosmosphere and Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1984. (b) Spiro, T. G. Iron
Sulfur proteins; Wiley, New York, 1982.
2) (a) Beswick, C. L.; schulman, J. M.; Stiefel E. I. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 52, 55
and references therein. (b) King, R. B. Inorg. Chem. 1963, 2, 641. (c) Davison,
A.; Edelstein, N.; Holm, R. H.; Maki, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 2799. (d)
Langford, C. H.; Billig, E.; Shupak, S. I.; Gray, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86,
2958. (e) Waters, J. H.; Williams, R.; Gray, H. B.; Schrauzer, G. N.; Finck, H. W.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 4199. (f) Davison, A.; Edelstein, N.; Holm, R. H.;
Maki, A. H. Inorg. Chem. 1965, 4, 55. (g) Schrauzer, G. N.; Mayweg, V.; Finck,
H. W.; Müller-westerhoff, U.; Heonrich, W. Angew. Chem. 1964, 76, 345.
3) (a) Ray, K.; Weyhermüller, T.; Goossens, A.; Crajé, M. W. J.; Wieghardt, K.
Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 4082. (b) Ray, K.; Bill, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5641. (c) Ray, K.; Begum, A.; Weyhermüller,
T.; Piligkos, S.; Slageren, J. V.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 4403.
4) Davison, A.; Edelstein, N.; Holm, R. H.; Maki, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86,
2799.
5) Sellmann, D.; Wille, M.; Knoch, F. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 2534.
6) Samsel, K.; Srinivasan, K.; Kochi, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 7606.
7) Krumpolc, M.; DeBoer, B. G.; and Roček, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 145.
8) Groves, J. T.; Kruper, W. J. Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 7613.
9) Siddall, T. L.; Miyaura, N.; Huffman, J. C.; Kochi, J. K. J. Chem. Soc. Chem.
Commun.. 1983, 1185.
10) Srinivasan, K.; Kochi, J. K. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 4671.
11) Farrell, R. P.; Lay, P. A.; Levina, A.; Maxwell, I. A.; Bramley, R.; Brumby, S.; Ji,
J. –Y. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 3159.
Cr complexes 112
12) (a) Codd, R.; Dillon, C. T.; Lay P. A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 216-217, 533. (b)
Levina, A.; Codd, R.; Dillon, C. T.; Lay, P. A. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 51, 145.
(c) Sugden, K. D.; Wetterhahn, K. E.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10811.
13) Pierpont, C. G. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 216.
14) Buchanan, R. M.; Kessel, S. L.; Downs, H. H.; Pierpont, C. G.; Hendrickson, D.
N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 7894.
15) Sofen, S. R.; Ware, D. C.; Cooper, S. R.; Raymond, K. N. Inorg. Chem. 1979, 18,
234.
16) (a) Chang, H. –C.; Miyasaka, H.; Kitagawa, S. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 146. (b)
Chang, H. –C.; Ishii, T.; Kondo, M.; Kitagawa, S. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.,
1999, 2467.
17) Cohn, M. J.; Xie, C. –L.; Tuchagues, J. P.; Pierpont, C. G.; Hendrickson, D. N.
Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 5028.
18) Downs, H. H.; Buchanan, R. M.; Pierpont, C. G. Inorg. Chem. 1979, 18, 1736.
19) Raymond, K. N.; Isied, S. S.; Brown, L. D.; Fronczek, F. R.; Nibert, J. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 1767.
20) Pierpont, C. G.; Downs, H. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 7894.
21) Levina, A.; Foran, G. J.; Pattison, D. I.; Lay, P. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 462.
22) (a) Bodensieck, W.; Carraux, Y.; Stoeckli-Evans, K.; Süss-Fink, G. Inorg. Chim.
Acta 1992, 195, 135. (b) Stein, C.; Bouma, S.; Carlson, J.; Cornelius, C.; Maeda,
J.; Weschler, C.; Deutsch, E.; Hodgson, K. O. Inorg. Chem. 1976, 15, 1183.
23) Bill, E.; Bothe, E.; Chaudhuri, P.; Chlopek, C.; Herebian, D.; Kokatam, S.; Ray,
K.; Weyhermüller, T.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 204.
24) Addison, A. W.; Rao, T. N.; Reedijk, J.; Rijn, J. V.; Verscoor, G. C. J Chem. Soc.
Dalt. Trans. 1984, 1349.
25) Judd, R. J.; Hambley, T. W.; Lay, P. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1989, 2205. (b)
Nishino, H.; Kochi, J. K. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 1990, 174, 93.
26) (a) Paine, T. K.; Weyhermueller, T.; Wieghardt, K.; Chaudhuri, P. Inorg. Chem.
2002, 41, 6538. (b) Eshel, M.; Bino, A. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2002, 329, 45. (c)
Chapter 5 113
Pattanayak, S.; Das, D. K.; Chakraborty, P.; Chakravorty, A. Inorg. Chem. 1995,
34, 6556.
27) (a) Wharton, E. J.; McCleverty, J. A. J. Chem. Soc. A, 1969, 2258. (b) Stiefel, E.
I.; Bennett, L. E.; Dori, Z.; Crawfford, T. H.; Simo, C.; Gray, H. Inorg. Chem.
1970, 9, 281. (c) Best, S. P.; Ciniawsky, S. A.; Humphrey, D. G. J. Chem. Soc.
Dalton Ttrans., 1966, 2945.
28) (a) Bhattacharya, S.; Boone, S. R.; Fox, G. A.; and Pierpont, C. G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 1088. (b) Attia, A. S.; Pierpont, C. G. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37,
3051.
29) (a) Jung, O. S.; Jo. D. H.; Lee, Y. –A.; Conklin, B. J. Pierpont, C. G. Inorg. Chem.
1997, 36, 19. (b) Attia, A. S.; Pierpont, C. G. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 1998, 37, 3051.
30) Hush, N. S. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1967, 8, 357.
31) Lay, P. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 51, 145.
32) Headlam, H. A.; Weeks, C. L.; Turner, p.; Hambley, T. W.; Lay, P. A. Inorg.
Chem. 2001, 40, 5097.
33) Ballhausen, C. J. Introduction to ligand field theory; McGraw-Hill: New York.
114
Chapter 6 115
6.1 Introduction
The aim of this chapter is to establish the electronic structures of the tris(o-
benzenedithiolato)molybdenum and tungsten, which have been previously described in
most cases as MoVI and WVI implying thereby a d0 electron configuration of the central
metal ion,1 and their one-electron reduced monoanionic forms are typically considered as
having a MV configuration thus assuming metal centered reductions. Most of these
complexes possess an unusual trigonal prismatic (TP) geometry. The crystal structure of
[MoVI(Lss)3 ] was reported2 with short average C-S bonds of 1.73Å and with visible
distortions of the rings from the normal aromatic behaviour. Knowing the non-innocent
nature of o-benzenedithiolate ligands3 along with the structural features of the ligand in
different oxidation states, the observed short C-S bond lengths in above mentioned
compounds provide ambiguity in assigning these complexes as [MVI(Lss)3]. Due to the
large experimental errors in the C-C and the C-S bond lengths in above mentioned and
other related compounds; an unambiguous assignment of the oxidation level of ligand
could not be made.
Gray et al.4 and Schrauzer and co-workers5 have employed molecular
orbital theory (MO theory) to understand the electronic structures and electronic
absorption spectra of six coordinate metallo-tris(dithiolenes). However, only the former
Chapter 6 Mo and W complexes of 2-mercapto-3,5-di-tert-
butylaniline and 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-
benzenedithiol
Mo and W complexes 116
researcher made concrete attempts to describe the electronic structure that stabilize the
TP geometry over the more common octahedral arrangement. Moreover, the MO
description of Gray and co-workers has been more accepted due to its ability to explain
the salient features of their electronic absorption spectra. On the other hand Schrauzer et
al.6 proposed the +4 oxidation state in the neutral complexes [M(S6C6R6)] with M = Cr,
Mo, and W. They represent the neutral compounds as shown in scheme 6.1.1, where the
three canonical forms have equal weight. They assumed that this type of ground state
delocalization is important with such ligands and is largely responsible for their unusual
chemical properties.
In comparison with metallo-tris(dithiolenes), tris compounds with o-
aminothiophenolate ligands are limited and only the structure of [Mo(abt)3] (abt = o-
aminothiophenolate, 2-) has been reported.7 In this case also the central metal ion has
been assigned a formal oxidation state of +6. As o-aminothiophenolate ligands have
proven to be redox noninnocent8 (i.e. they can exist in different oxidation levels) the
assigned +6 oxidation state of the metal ion is therefore ambiguous since redox
noninnocent nature of ligand was ignored. To study these systems carefully, we have
synthesized tris molybdenum complex with 2-mercapto-3,5-di-tert-butylaniline H2[tLNS]
and a series of neutral and monoanionic complexes of Mo and W with 3,5-di-tert-butyl-
1,2-benzenedithiol H2[tLSS] and have characterized these with X-ray crystallography and
other spectroscopic methods.
S
SM S
S
SS
S
SM S
S
SS
S
SM S
S
SS
Scheme 6.1.1: Resonance forms of [M(Lss)3] complexes suggested by Schrauzer et al.
Chapter 6 117
6.2 Synthesis and characterization
[Mo(tLNS)3] (11):
To a solution of the ligand 2-mercapto-3,5-di-tert-butylaniline H2[tLNS] in MeOH, a
solution of MoO2(acac)2 in MeOH was added. After one hour, a green precipitate of
[Mo(tLNS)3] was filtered of and recrystallized from a mixture of dichloromethane and
diethyl ether (1:1).
[Mo(tLSS)3] (12)
It was obtained similarly and was recrystallized from a mixture of MeCN/diethyl ether.
The infrared spectrum of 12 shows an intense peak at 1107 cm-1 corresponding to a C-S●
stretch and weak bands at 1023, 1040 cm-1, corresponding to the C-S stretches. A band at
1585 cm-1 indicates the presence of a C=C double bond in the aromatic ring of the ligand.
[N(n-Bu)4][Mo(tLSS)3] (12b)
To a CH2Cl2 solution of [Mo(tLss)3] was added [N(n-Bu)4]SH. The olive green air
sensitive mixture was concentrated under vacuum and the resulting solid was
recrystallized from a mixture of DCM and MeCN. The strong peak at 1107 cm-1, which
was present in the infrared spectrum of the 12, is absent in the spectrum of 12b, thus
suggesting the absence of an intense C-S● mode.
[W(tLSS)3] (13)
A CCl4 solution of tungstenhexachloride and 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-benzenedithiol was
heated under anaerobic conditions and allowed to cool to room temp. A blue-green
powder obtained after evaporation of the solvent was recrystallized from EtOH and
diethyl ether. The infrared spectrum of 13 is identical to that of 12. The IR spectrum
shows a strong peak at 1110 cm-1 corresponding to C-S● and weak peaks at 1023 and
1040 cm-1 that correspond to C-S stretching frequencies.
[N(n-Bu)4][W(tLSS)3] (13b)
To a solution of [W(tLss)3] in CH2Cl2, was added [N(n-Bu)4]SH under anaerobic
conditions. The olive green air sensitive mixture was concentrated under vacuum and the
resulting solid was recrystallized from mixture of DCM and MeCN. In the infrared
spectrum of 13b, no peak at 1110 cm-1 is observed.
Mo and W complexes 118
6.3 Molecular structures
The X-ray crystal structures of compounds 11, 12, 12b, 13 and 13b at
100(2) K have been determined using Mo Kα radiation.
The complex 11 crystllizes in the monoclinic crystal system in the space
group p21/n. The molybdenum atom is six coordinate and bonded to the sulfur and
nitrogen atoms from the three 2-aminothiophenolate ligands. The coordinated atoms are
arranged in roughly trigonal-prismatic geometry about the molybdenum atom with the
two triangular faces defined by the three sulfur atoms and by the three nitrogen atoms.
The S3N3 polyhedron is distorted from ideal trigonal-prismatic geometry. One kind of
distortion arises from the different dimensions of the triangular faces. The triangle
defined by the sulfur atoms has an average S....S distance of 3.149(30)Å, while the
smaller triangle has an N....N side of 2.214(6) Å. Thus, the polyhedron is severely
tapered.
One descriptor of the distortion in the tris-chelate complexes is the chelate
projection (twist) angle.16 Fig. 6.3.1a shows a projection along the approximate C3 axis
normal to the mean plane defined by the above pair of triangular faces and gives the
individual chelate projection angles (Ф'). This
angles should be 0˚ in the trigonal prismatic
limit and 60˚ in the octahedral limit. The
individual values observed here are Ф(S(1),
Mo, N(2)) = 2.6˚, Ф(S(21), Mo, N(22)) = 1.9˚,
and Ф(S(41), Mo, N(42)) = 1.3˚. It is clear
that the compound has nearly ideal trigonal
prismatic geometry. In [Mo(abt)]3,7 these
distortion is on average 12.4˚. A thermal
ellipsoid plot with the atom labeling scheme is
shown in Fig. 6.3.1b. Table 6.3.1 and 6.3.2
display the relevant bond distances and bond angles, respectively. A solvent molecule of
diethyl ether is crystallized in the unit of the crystal providing a hydrogen bonding
interaction between N(1)-H(1)…..O(43) (3.019(4) Å, 161.5(2)˚). The average Mo-N
distance of 2.025(4) Å is almost identical to that of 1.997(8) Å found in [Mo(abt)3]. The
L1
L2 L3
L'1
L'2
L'3
M
Ø
Fig. 6.3.1a
Chapter 6 119
average Mo-S distance of 2.3867(9) Å is shorter than the distance at 2.418(6) Å found in
[Mo(abt)3], but is identical with the distance at 2.367(6) Å in [Mo(bdt)3]2 (bdt =
benzenedithiolato). The average C-S distance of 1.740(3) Å is intermediate between
typical single and double bond values. The average C-N distance of 1.364(4) is also
shorter than normal C-N single bond distance. Both of these C-S and C-N distances
clearly indicate the presence of o-iminothiobenzosemiquinonato(1-) radical ligands. The
individual C-C distances in each phenyl ring show quinoid type distortions with two
alternate short bonds (1.376(4), 1.387(4) Å) and four longer ones (1.423(4) Å). As
discussed in the case of 8 ([N(n-bu)4][Cr(tLSS)3], Chaper 5), the estimation of number of
radical ligands is difficult for six-coordinated complexes from the structural features.
Thus X-ray crystal structure analysis alone is not sufficient to confirm the physical
oxidation state of metal in this complex.
Bond distances [Å] Mo(1)-N(2) 2.026(3) Mo(1)-N(22) 2.026(3) Mo(1)-N(42) 2.024(3) Mo(1)-S(1) 2.397(9) Mo(1)-S(21) 2.385(9) Mo(1)-S(41) 2.378(9) S(1)-C(1) 1.741(3) S(21)-C(21) 1.744(3) S(41)-C(41) 1.737(3) N(2)-C(2) 1.363(4) N(22)-C(22) 1.370(4) N(42)-C(42) 1.360(4) C(1)-C(2) 1.421(4) C(21)-C(22) 1.428(5) C(41)-C(42) 1.427(5)
C(1)-C(6) 1.433(4) C(21)-C(26) 1.435(4) C(41)-C(46) 1.427(4) C(2)-C(3) 1.416(4) C(22)-C(23) 1.418(4) C(42)-C(43) 1.410(5) C(3)-C(4) 1.376(4) C(23)-C(24) 1.367(5) C(43)-C(44) 1.380(5) C(4)-C(5) 1.422(4) C(24)-C(25) 1.418(5) C(44)-C(45) 1.415(5) C(5)-C(6) 1.387(4) C(25)-C(26) 1.380(5) C(45)-C(46) 1.379(5)
Bond angles (deg) N(42) -Mo(1)-S(41) 77.68(8) N(22) -Mo(1)-S(21) 73.99(8) N(2) -Mo(1)-S(1) 77.27(8) N(2) -Mo(1)-S(41) 132.93(8) N(22) -Mo(1)-S(41) 136.14(9) N(42) -Mo(1)-S(21) 134.36(9)
Table 6.3.1: Selected bond distances [Å] for 11
Table 6.3.2: Selected bond angles [deg] for 11
Mo and W complexes 120
The complex 12 crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system in the space
group P21/n. The three bidentate ligands [H2(tLSS)] coordinate to the molybdenum ion
through the deprotonated sulfur atoms in
order to form a polyhedron which is not
close to either the trigonal prismatic (TP) or
octahedral geometry. The structure consists
of two S3 triangles, with an average side of
3.18(6) Å. The individual chelate projection
(twist) angles for each ligand are Ф(S(1),
Mo, S(2)) = 4.7˚; Ф(S(21), Mo2, S(22)) =
1.9˚ and Ф(S(41), Mo, S(42)) = 1.6˚ (Fig. Fig. 6.3.2a
S2
S21
S1
S42
S22
S41
M
Ø=4.7
Ø=1.9
Ø=1.6
Fig. 6.3.1b: Thermal ellipsoid plot of 11 with ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level with atom labeling scheme.
Mo(1)
S(1)C(1)
C(2)C(3)
C(4)
C(5)C(6)
N(1)
O(43)
N(2)S(2)
C(22)
C(23)
C(24)C(25)
C(26)
C(21)
Chapter 6 121
6.3.2a). Hence the triangles are twisted from each other by an averaged angle of 2.7˚,
very close to the ideal TP value of 0˚. The mean S-M-S angle involving trans sulfur
atoms is 136 ± 1˚ in known trigonal prismatic structures.4,5,9 The mean value of 134.94(2)
observed in 12 is similar to that observed in [Mo(bdt)3]2 and is clearly consistent with
trigonal prismatic geometry. The intra- and interligand S-Mo-S angles (81.42(2),
81.65(2), 81.33(2)˚) are similar and agree with those found in TP structures. The average
Mo-S distance of (2.364(5) Å) is similar to the corresponding distance in [Mo(bdt)3].2 A
thermal ellipsoid plot of 12 with the labelling scheme is shown below in Fig. 6.3.2b.
Table 6.3.3 and 6.3.4 display the important bond distances and bond angles.
There is a disorder in the sulfur atoms leading to uncertainty in the C-S
and Mo-S distances. The sulfur–carbon distance (average 1.737(3) Å) is shorter than that
observed in 8 ([N(n-bu)4][Cr(tLss)3]; 1.75 Å). In 8, it was concluded that the metal is in
the +3 oxidation state and two monoanionic-monoradical ligands are present. In 12, the
C-S bond distance (average 1.737(3) Å) is intermediate of single and double bond
distance. The individual C-C distances in each phenyl ring show quinoid type distortions
with two alternate short bonds (1.376(2), 1.381(2) Å) and four longer ones (1.418(5) Å).
Thus even though the quinoid type distortions in phenyl rings suggest the presence of
radical ligands, disorders in the sulfur atoms prevent the unambiguous assignment for the
oxidation level of ligands and metal from the structural characterization
.
Bond distances [Å] Mo(1)-S(1) 2.3600(5) Mo(1)-S(21) 2.3709(5) Mo(1)-S(41) 2.3645(6) Mo(1)-S(2) 2.3677(5) Mo(1)-S(22) 2.3602(5) Mo(1)-S(42) 2.3582(6) S(1)-C(1) 1.745(2) S(21)-C(21) 1.748(2) S(41)-C(41) 1.743(2) S(2)-C(2) 1.738(2) S(22)-C(22) 1.715(2) S(42)-C(42) 1.733(2) C(1)-C(2) 1.410(3) C(21)-C(22) 1.414(3) C(41)-C(42) 1.413(3) C(1)-C(6) 1.433(2) C(21)-C(26) 1.431(3) C(41)-C(46) 1.436(3) C(2)-C(3) 1.414(2) C(22)-C(23) 1.404(3) C(42)-C(43) 1.410(3) C(3)-C(4) 1.376(2) C(23)-C(24) 1.369(3) C(43)-C(44) 1.371(3)
C(4)-C(5) 1.415(4) C(24)-C(25) 1.413(3) C(44)-C(45) 1.417(3)
C(5)-C(6) 1.381(2) C(25)-C(26) 1.373(3) C(45)-C(46) 1.384(3)
Table 6.3.3: Selected bond distances [Å] for 12
Mo and W complexes 122
12b crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system in space group P21/c. The
molybdenum atom is coordinated to the sulfur atoms of the three 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2
benzenedithiolato ligands. The geometry around the molybdenum is again intermediate
between octahedral and trigonal prismatic (twist angles: Ф(S(1), Mo, S(2)) = 39.9˚,
Bond angles (deg) S(1)-Mo(1)-S(2) 81.42(2) S(21) -Mo(1)-S(22) 81.33(2) S(41) -Mo(1)-S(42) 81.65(2) S(1) -Mo(1)-S(41) 136.27(2) S(22) -Mo(1)-S(41) 132.92(2) S(42) -Mo(1)-S(21) 135.63(2)
Table 6.3.4: Selected angles [deg] for 12
Fig. 6.3.2b: The thermal ellipsoid drawing of the 12 at the 50% probability level with atom-labeling scheme is shown.
Mo(1)
S(1)C(1)
C(2)C(3)
C(4)
C(5)C(6)
S(2)
S(21)
S(22)
C(21)C(22)
C(23)C(24)
Chapter 6 123
Ф(S(41), Mo, S(42)) = 25.4˚, and Ф(S(21), Mo, S(22)) = 29.7˚; average = 31.67˚). The
average twist angle (31.67˚) is identical to that observed in the [N(n-bu)4][Mo(bdt)3],10
where the twist angle was 33.5˚. A schematic representation of the bond lengths and
dihedral angles between the three independent o-benzodithiolene rings and S-Mo-S
planes are displayed in Fig. 6.3.3. The dihedral angles between the planes of the o-
dithiolene rings and the S-Cr-S planes are 13.6, 23.9 and 3.3° for rings one through three,
respectively.
The average intramolecular Mo-S distances of 2.3775(7) Å is similar to
that found in the neutral complex 12 suggesting that the oxidation state of the metal is the
same in both of these complexes. The average C-S bond distance of 1.758 ± 0.009Å
indicates single bond character, and the C-C distances in the phenyl ring are almost
equidistant within the experimental error (1.402(4) Å). These bond distances are reliable
as there is no disorder problem in this structure and lead to the conclusion that all the tree
ligands are closed-shell dianionic o-dithiolate (2-) and the metal ion is in the +5 oxidation
state. Considering the ligand centered reduction leading to unchanged metal oxidation
state in neutral (12) and monoanionic (12b), the presence of one radical ligand in the
neutral 12 with +5 oxidation state of metal is suggested. Fig. 6.3.4 shows the thermal
ellipsoids of the anion in 12b with labelling scheme and table 6.3.5 and 6.3.6 display the
important bond angles and bond distances respectively.
Fig. 6.3.3: Schematic representation of the bond distances and dihedral angles for 12b
S(2)(1)S
Mo
S(22)(21)S
Mo
S(42)(41)S
Mo
2.373
3(7) 2.3818(8) 2.3
824(8
) 2.3911(7) 2.373
3(7) 2.3560(7)
av. 1.399(4) av. 1.402(4) av. 1.403(4)
di. angle= 13.6 °
di. angle= 23.9 °
di. angle= 3.3 °
1.765(3)
1.75
1(3) 1.759(3)
1.76
4(3) 1.759(3)
1.74
4(3)
Mo and W complexes 124
Bond angles (deg) S(1)-Mo(1)-S(2) 81.21(2) S(21) -Mo(1)-S(22) 81.11(2) S(41) -Mo(1)-S(42) 81.69(3) S(1) -Mo(1)-S(21) 158.08(3) S(2) -Mo(1)-S(41) 159.37(3) S(42) -Mo(1)-S(22) 152.21(3)
Bond distance [Å] Mo(1)-S(1) 2.3733(7) Mo(1)-S(21) 2.3824(7) Mo(1)-S(41) 2.3733(7) Mo(1)-S(2) 2.3818(8) Mo(1)-S(22) 2.3911(7) Mo(1)-S(42) 2.3560(7) S(1)-C(1) 1.765(3) S(21)-C(21) 1.759(3) S(41)-C(41) 1.759(3) S(2)-C(2) 1.751(3) S(22)-C(22) 1.764(3) S(42)-C(42) 1.744(3) C(1)-C(2) 1.404(4) C(21)-C(22) 1.407(4) C(41)-C(42) 1.411(4) C(1)-C(6) 1.417(4) C(21)-C(26) 1.416(4) C(41)-C(46) 1.430(4) C(2)-C(3) 1.388(4) C(22)-C(23) 1.401(4) C(42)-C(43) 1.400(4) C(3)-C(4) 1.387(4) C(23)-C(24) 1.386(4) C(43)-C(44) 1.373(4)
C(4)-C(5) 1.404(4) C(24)-C(25) 1.404(4) C(44)-C(45) 1.412(4)
C(5)-C(6) 1.396(4) C(25)-C(26) 1.399(4) C(45)-C(46) 1.392(4)
Table 6.3.6: Selected bond distances [Å] for 12b
Table 6.3.5: Selected bond angles [deg] for 12b
Chapter 6 125
The structure of 13 is isostructural to that of compound 12; therefore it is
not shown separately. This complex also crystallizes in space group P21/n with an
identical intramolecular arrangement to compound 12. Similar to 12, sulfur atoms of the
ligand exhibit disorder leading to inaccuracy in the C-S and Mo-S bond distances. Table
6.3.7 and 6.3.8 display the important bond angles and bond distances, respectively.
The individual chelate projection (twist) angles for each ligand are Ф(S(1),
W(1), S(2)) = 4.2˚; Ф(S(21), W(1), S(22)) = 0.6˚ and Ф(S(41), W(1), S(42)) = 9.9˚.
Hence the triangles are twisted from each other by an average angle of 4.9˚ an exact
intermediate of octahedral (60˚) and TP value of (0˚). The similar complex with un-
substituted ligand, [W(C6H4S2-1,2)3]11 shows a (0˚) twist angle, implying a perfect TP
geometry. The intra molecular M-S and C-S distances are very similar to that observed in
12, 2.361(1), and 1.747(8) Å, respectively. Thus the oxidation level of ligands and metal
should be similar in both of these compounds.
Mo(1)
S(1)
C(1)
C(2)C(3)
C(4)
C(5)C(6)
S(2)S(42)
S(41)
C(42)
C(41)C(46)
S(22)
S(21)
Fig. 6.3.4: The thermal ellipsoid drawing of the 12b at the 50% probability level with atom-labeling scheme.
Mo and W complexes 126
Bond distance [Å] W(1)-S(1) 2.361(1) W(1)-S(21) 2.360(1) W(1)-S(41) 2.363(1) W(1)-S(2) 2.374(1) W(1)-S(22) 2.352(1) W(1)-S(42) 2.357(1) S(1)-C(1) 1.748(4) S(21)-C(21) 1.773(4) S(41)-C(41) 1.763(4) S(2)-C(2) 1.738(4) S(22)-C(22) 1.723(4) S(42)-C(42) 1.739(4) C(1)-C(2) 1.411(5) C(21)-C(22) 1.391(6) C(41)-C(42) 1.412(5) C(1)-C(6) 1.428(5) C(21)-C(26) 1.437(5) C(41)-C(46) 1.429(45 C(2)-C(3) 1.411(5) C(22)-C(23) 1.413(6) C(42)-C(43) 1.402(5) C(3)-C(4) 1.375(5) C(23)-C(24) 1.380(6) C(43)-C(44) 1.371(5)
C(4)-C(5) 1.410(5) C(24)-C(25) 1.408(6) C(44)-C(45) 1.411(5)
C(5)-C(6) 1.377(5) C(25)-C(26) 1.378(6) C(45)-C(46) 1.380(5)
Bond angles (deg) S(1)-W(1)-S(2) 81.11(3) S(21) -W(1)-S(22) 81.18(4) S(41) -W(1)-S(42) 81.39(3) S(1) -W(1)-S(21) 134.22(4) S(22) -W(1)-S(41) 133.86(4) S(1) -W(1)-S(41) 135.25(4)
Table 6.3.8: Selected distances [Å] for 13
Table 6.3.7: Selected bond angles [deg] for 13
Chapter 6 127
The structure of 13b is isostructural with that of compound 12b; therefore
it is not shown separately. This complex also crystallizes in the space group P21/m with
an identical intramolecular arrangement to compound 12b. Table 6.3.9 and 6.3.10 display
important bond angles and bond distances, respectively. The individual chelate projection
(twist) angles for each ligand are Ф(S(1), W(1), S(2)) = 37.9˚; Ф(S(21), W(1), S(22)) =
26.3˚ and Ф(S(21X), W(1), S(22X)) = 30.3˚. The average twist angle of 31.5˚ is similar
to that observed in 12b. The average twist angle of 33˚ observed in [PHMe2Ph][W(1,2-
C6H4S2)3]12 is similar to that observed in 13b. A schematic representation of the bond
lengths and dihedral angles between the three independent o-benzodithiolene rings and S-
W-S planes are displayed in Fig. 6.3.5. The dihedral angles between the planes of the o-
dithiolene rings and the S-W-S planes are 11.9, 21.2 and 4.4° for rings one through three,
respectively. The average intramolecular M-S (2.370(2) Å) and C-S (1.760(7) Å)
distances are identical within the experimental error with the 12b, where all the C-S
distances clearly show single bond character.
The C-C distances in the phenyl ring are also almost equidistant within the
experimental error (1.39(1)) implying a dianionic o-dithiolate (2-) form of ligands and
thus the similar +5 oxidation state of metals in 12b and 13b.
S(2)(1)S
W
S(22)(21)S
W
S(42)(41)S
W
2.373
(2)
2.376(2) 2.380
(2)
2.381(2) 2.381
(2)
2.365(2)
av. 1.399(4) av. 1.402(4) av. 1.403(4)
di. angle= 11.9 °
di. angle= 21.2 °
di. angle= 4.4 °1.763(7)
1.74
3(8) 1.763(7) 1.
775(
8) 1.769(8) 1.75
4(8)
Fig. 6.3.5: schematic representation of the bond distances and dihedral angles for 13b.
Mo and W complexes 128
An overview of the twist angles for all these complexes is shown below in
table 6.3.11. Almost all of these compounds show intermediate of ideal TP and
octahedral geometry. The most important electronic structure factors that have been
suggested to stabilize the TP geometry in metallo-tris(dithiolenes) are strong metal sulfur
π bonding as well as very effective interligand (S-S) bonding interactions.13,14 Indeed, the
ligand-ligand repulsions are maximized in the TP geometry and minimized in the
Bond angles (deg) S(1)-W(1)-S(2) 81.59(7) S(21) -W(1)-S(22) 81.36(7) S(41) -W(1)-S(42) 81.61(8) S(1) -W(1)-S(21) 158.27(7) S(2) -W(1)-S(41) 159.62(7) N(42) -W(1)-S(22) 153.91(7)
Bond distance [Å] W(1)-S(1) 2.373(2) W(1)-S(21) 2.380(2) W(1)-S(1) 2.373(2) W(1)-S(2) 2.376(2) W(1)-S(22) 2.373(2) W(1)-S(2) 2.376(2) S(1)-C(1) 1.763(7) S(21)-C(21) 1.763(7) S(41)-C(41) 1.769(8) S(2)-C(2) 1.743(8) S(22)-C(22) 1.775(8) S(42)-C(42) 1.754(8) C(1)-C(2) 1.39(1) C(21)-C(22) 1.40(1) C(41)-C(42) 1.37(1) C(1)-C(6) 1.41(1) C(21)-C(26) 1.41(1) C(41)-C(46) 1.43(1) C(2)-C(3) 1.41(1) C(22)-C(23) 1.41(1) C(42)-C(43) 1.41(1) C(3)-C(4) 1.38(1) C(23)-C(24) 1.40(1) C(43)-C(44) 1.35(1)
C(4)-C(5) 1.40(1) C(24)-C(25) 1.38(1) C(44)-C(45) 1.42(1)
C(5)-C(6) 1.39(1) C(25)-C(26) 1.39(1) C(45)-C(46) 1.36(1)
Table 6.3.10: Selected distances [Å] for 13b.
Table 6.3.9: Selected bond angles [deg] for 13b.
Chapter 6 129
octahedral geometry. Understanding both the π donor and π-acceptor properties of
coordinated dithiolenes provides a basis for understanding how electron delocalization
can stabilize TP geometry. Considering a noncovalent (ionic) bonding model involving
high-valent metal centers and reduced unsaturated dithiolates, in the dianionic limit,
ligand-ligand repulsions are more, and the distortions of metallo-tris(dithiolenes) will
tend toward an octahedral geometry in order to minimize interligand S-S interactions. If
one now allows for metal-ligand covalency, the ligand electron density is delocalized
over the half filled or empty metal d orbitals, resulting in a reduction of interligand S-S
repulsions and increased stabilization of TP geometry.15
6.4 Electrochemistry
The electrochemistry of [Mo(tLNS)3] (11), [Mo(tLSS)3] (12) and [W(tLSS)3]
(13), have been studied in CH2Cl2 solution by cyclic voltammetry (CV), with 0.10M
[N(n-Bu)4][PF6] as a supporting electrolyte, a glassy carbon as working electrode and
Ag/AgNO3 as reference electrode. Ferrocene was used as an internal standard, and all
redox potentials are referenced versus the ferrocene/ferrocenium (Fc/Fc+) couple at room
temperature. Fig. 6.4.1, 6.4.2 and 6.4.3 show the cyclic voltammograms of 11, 12, and 13
over the potential range from +2.0 V to -2.0 V and +0.5 V to –2.0 V, respectively. For 11,
three reversible electron-transfer waves were observed and for 12 and 13 two reversible
and one irreversible electron-transfer waves were observed. Table 6.4.1 summarizes the
redox potentials (E1/2) for compounds 11, 12 and 13 vs. (Fc/Fc+), respectively.
According to coulometric measurements at appropriate fixed potentials,
two reversible processes in 11, 12 and 13 namely; E21/2, and E3
1/2 correspond to reduction
and the one E41/2 correspond to oxidation. The redox potentials for the -2/-1 and –1/0
Compound 11 12 12b 13 13b
Av. Α (deg) 1.7 26.1 31.6 30 31.5
Table 6.3.11: Comparison of trigonal prismatic angles in 11, 12, 12b, 13 and 13b.
Mo and W complexes 130
couple in 11 are quite higher than that in 12 and 13, indicating that these redox couples
are highly dependent on the ligand. In addition, the redox potential for -2/-
1 and –1/0 couple in [Mo(bdt)]2 are about 0.5 V higher than that in 12 and
13. These redox potentials in general reflect that the electron donating groups stabilize
the highly negatively charged species. The redox potential of the 0/+1 couple is very high
in 12 and 13, and the wave is irreversible; therefore coulometry was not done. The cyclic
Compound E21/2(2-/1-) E3
1/2(1-/0) E41/2(0/1+)
[Mo(tLNS)3] (11) -1.595 -0.823 +0.133
[Mo(tLSS)3] (12) -0.994 -0.482 +0.91
[W(tLSS)3] (13) -1.109 -0.474 +0.951
[Mo(bdt)3]2 -0.390 +0.20
Table 6.4.1: Redox potentials (V) of 11, 12 and 13 vs. Fc/Fc+ at 22° C.
Fig. 6.4.1: Cyclic Voltammogram of 11 in CH2Cl2 solution containing 0.10M [(n-bu)4N][PF6] at scan rates of 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, mV/s at 22°C.
-2.5-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.0
10µA
I (µA
)
E (V)
Chapter 6 131
voltammograms do not change after coulometric reduction, indicating effective stability
of the reduced products. The redox reactions, monitored spectroelectrochemically,
proceed with well-defined isobestic points and stoichiometric conversions.
Fig. 6.4.2: Cyclic Voltammogram of 12 in CH2Cl2 solution containing 0.10M [(n-bu)4N][PF6] at scan rates of 25, 50, 100, 200 mV/s at 22°C.
-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.0
10µA
E (V)
Fig. 6.4.3: Cyclic Voltammogram of 13 in CH2Cl2 solution containing 0.10M [(n-bu)4N][PF6] at scan rates of 25, 50, 100, 200 mV/s at 22°C.
-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.0
10µA
E (mV)
Mo and W complexes 132
Chronoamperometry was utilized to monitor the changes in infrared
frequencies upon one and two electron reductions at appropriate fixed potential for 12
and 13. In the neutral species, there is a sharp band at ~1106 cm-1 (corresponding to C-S●
radical ligand) and a weak band at 1041 cm-1(correspond to C-S single bond stretching).
Upon one electron reduction, the peak at 1106 cm-1 disappears in both 12 and 13. This is
an evidence for presence of a single π-radical ligand in the neutral species, and three non-
radical ligands in the monoanionic species suggesting the +5 oxidation state of metal in
both of these species. This result together with X-ray crystal structure analysis of 12, 12b,
13 and 13b confirms the ligand centered redox activities as demonstrated below in
scheme 6.4.1.
[MV(tL0SS)(tLSS)2]+
-e+e
[MV(tLSS)(tLSS)2]+e-e -e[MV(tLSS)3]1- +e [MIV(tLSS)3]2-
Scheme 6.4.1 redox activity of 12 and 13
Fig. 6.4.3: Infrared spectra of 12 and 12b.
1050110011501200
[Mo(tLSS)3]-
[Mo(tLSS)3]
cm -1
rel.
tran
smita
nce
1106 cm-1
(C=S●)
Chapter 6 133
6.5 Electronic spectra
The electronic absorption spectra of 11, 12 and 12b along with their
electrochemically generated mono-, and dianionic species are displayed in Fig.6.5.1,
6.5.2 and 6.5.3, respectively. The general similarity of the electronic absorption spectra
for neutral as well as mono-and dianionic forms leads to the proposition that they all
possess a similar electronic structure. Electronic absorption spectra for the neutral
complexes exhibit two intense electronic transition bands in the visible region: ~ 400 nm
(1.5 × 104 M-1 cm-1) and ~700 nm (2.5 × 104 M-1 cm-1). According to a MO scheme
developed by Gray et al.4a for [M(S2C2Ph2)3] (M = Re, Mo, W) (Fig. 6.5.4) the band at
~700 nm is assigned to the 2a2'(3πv) → 5e' (3πv, dxy, dx2-y2) transition and the ~400 nm
band to the 3e'(πh), 2a2''(πh) → 3a'(dz2) transitions. The 5e' and 3a' both have considerable
ligand character. Thus these and similar transitions in 11, 12 and 13 are L→ M in
character. The LMCT nature of transitions is evident from the fact that in [W(tLss)3]
10001050110011501200
[W(tLSS)3]-
rel.
tran
mita
nce
cm-1
[W(tLSS)3]
Fig. 6.4.4: Infrared spectra of 13 and 13b.
1106 cm-1 (C=S●)
Mo and W complexes 134
transitions always occur at higher energies (lower wavelengths) than the their
corresponding [Mo(tLss)3] counterparts. Thus, predominantly metal-based MOs of W are
stabilized relative to those of Mo and are located at deeper binding energies.
The electronic absorption spectra of monoanionic species exhibit four
bands in the visible region (table 6.5.1). In contrast to the spectrum of [Cr(tLss)3]1- (8)
and [Cr(tLCat)3]1- (10b) (chapter 5), they do not exhibit any charge transfer band in the
near infrared region, which are known as intervalence ligand to ligand charge transfer
bands. Absence of IVLLCT bands for 11b, 12b and 13b suggest that three of the ligands
in these species are closed shell, aromatic o-dithiolate (2-). In the electronic absorption
spectra of dianionic species (11c, 12c and 13c), two intense bands in the visible region
are present, which may correspond to ligand to metal charge transfer bands. Thus, redox
activities of these compounds are predominantly ligand centered and redox behavior can
be explained as shown in scheme 6.5.1 for 11 and scheme 6.4.1 for 12, and 13.
400 600 800 1000 12000.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0 [MoV(tLNS)3]1-
[MoIV(tLNS)3]2-
[MoV(tLNS)3]1+
[MoV(tLNS)3]
ε X
104 M
-1 c
m-1
λ nm
Fig. 6.5.1: Electronic absorption spectra of the neutral and the electrochemically reduced forms of 11 in CH2Cl2 solution, (0.10M[(n-Bu)4N] PF6) at –5 0C
Chapter 6 135
λ1(ε) λ2 (ε) λ3 (ε) λ4 (ε) [Mo(tLNS)3] (11) 408 (2.04) 719 (1.83)[Mo(tLNS)3]+ (11a) 402 (1.42) 477 (1.38) 767 (1.60) [Mo(tLNS)3]1- (11b) 329 (1.87) 438 (1.31) 581 (0.64) 663 (0.51) [Mo(tLNS)3]2- (11c) 347 (1.75) 486 (1.88) 649 (0.13) [Mo(tLss)3] (12) 430 (2.14) 693 (2.48) 881 (0.32) [Mo(tLss)3]1- (12b) 413 (1.57) 479 (1.16) 638 (0.88) 701 (0.80) [Mo(tLss)3]2- (12c) 353 (2.5) 413 (0.33) 575 (1.71) 628 (0.64) [W(tLss)3] (13) 353 (1.25) 390 (1.90) 649 (2.53) 790 (0.35) [W(tLss)3]1- (13b) 360 (1.91) 537 (1.17) 632 (0.613) [W(tLss)3]2- (13c) 344 (1.84) 384 (0.40) 468 (2.45) 539 (0.90)
Fig. 6.5.2: Electronic absorption spectra of the neutral and the electrochemically reduced forms of 12 in CH2Cl2 solution, (0.10M[(n-Bu)4N] PF6) at –5 0C
400 600 800 10000.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
[MoV(tLSS)3]1-
[MoIV(tLSS)3]2-
[MoV(tLSS)2(L.SS)]
ε X
104
M-1
cm-1
λ nm
Table 6.5.1: wavelength [nm] and extinction coefficients (104 M-1 cm-1) for neutral and electrochemically generated species of 11, 12 and 13.
[MoV(tL0NS)(tLNS)2]+
-e+e
[MoV(tLNS)(tLNS)2]+e-e -e[MoV(tLNS)3]1- +e [MoIV(tLNS)3]2-
Scheme 6.5.1: Redox activity of 11
Mo and W complexes 136
5 d
6 s
π hπ h
π h
3 π v
3 π v
3 π vdx2-y2 , xy
π h
3 π v
dx2-y2 , xy
dz2
dxz,yz
2a2"3e'3e"
4e'2a2'3a1'5e'
Fig. 6.5.4: A diagram showing the orbital levels of interest informulating the ground state of [M(S2C2Ph2)3]4a.
Metal
Ligand
Fig. 6.5.3: Electronic absorption spectra of the neutral and the electrochemically reduced forms of 13 in CH2Cl2 solution, (0.10M[(n-Bu)4N] PF6) at –5 0C
400 600 800 10000.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0 [ WV(Lss)3]
1-
[ WIV(Lss)3]2-
[ WV(Lss)2(L.SS)2]
ε X
104 M
-1 c
m-1
λ nm
Chapter 6 137
6.6 X-band EPR spectra and magnetic susceptibility
The X-band EPR spectra are recorded for electrochemically generated
monocation and monoanion species of 11, 12 and 13 in frozen CH2Cl2 solutions at 10 K.
Magnetic susceptibility data of complexes 11, 12, 12b, 13 and 13b were collected in the
temperature range 2 to 290 K. As expected compounds 11, 12 and 13 are diamagnetic and
12b, 13b are paramagnetic. The EPR spectrum of electrochemically generated reduced
form of 11 i.e 11b displayed a 16 line hyperfine pattern due to the coupling of 95Mo (I =
5/2) nucleus along with the superhyperfine splitting due to 14N (I = 1), 1H (I=1/2) at 221
K. This superhyperfine was absent in the frozen solution (at the 10 K) or at room
temperature. It is reported that the temperature at which highest resolution is obtained is
above the freezing point of the solvent.19 The fitting parameters obtained from simulation
are: giso = 1.996, Ax = ( 14N = 8, 1H = 21), AY = ( 14N = 6, 1H = 8) G and 95,97Mo = 34G.
Similar g value and hyperfine splitting constants have been reported for [Mo(abt)3]1-(g =
1.988, A95,97Mo = 38, A14N = 2.1 and A1H = 6.3)G.17 The EPR spectrum of the monocation
species (denoted as 11a henceforward) shows the similar 16-line hyperfine splitting due
to 95,97Mo (I = 5/2) nucleus along with the superhyperfine splitting due to 14N (I = 1), 1H
(I = 1/2) at 194 K. The similarity between the EPR spectral parameters of 11a and 11b
imply in the identical metal oxidation state in both of these species.
The S=1/2 state thus observed for 11a and 11b in the EPR spectrum can
342 344 346 348-0,4
-0,2
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8 Sim
Exp
B (mT)343 344 345 346 347
-0,6
-0,4
-0,2
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
B (mT)
Fig. 6.6.1: X-band EPR spectra of 11a and 11b 11b(left) Exp: T = 221.9 K, ν = 9.64GHz, P = 2.007 mW, MA = 0 G
11a(right) Exp: T = 193.8 K, ν = 9.64GHz, P = 2.002 mW, MA = 0 G
Mo and W complexes 138
be interpreted as arising from a d1 system (MoV), or an exchange coupled d2(MoIV)-ligand
radical system. But the structural features favour the MoV configuration. The presence of
MoV in both 11a and 11b clearly suggests that the neutral compound 11 also possesses
MoV oxidation state that undergoes ligand centered redox processes.
The X band EPR spectrum of 12b is shown in Fig. 6.6.2. It shows an axial
signal with hyperfine splitting due to interaction of 95,97Mo (I = 5/2, 9.5% natural
abundance) nucleus, which leads to 6-line hyperfine pattern. This hyperfine interaction
was not observable at 10K but only at 230K it was observable. The simulation yields
following fitting parameters: g║ = 2.0021, g┴ = 2.0191.
Fig. 6.6.3 displays the magnetic moment vs. temperature plot for 12b. It
shows a temperature independent magnetic moment of 1.70 µB corresponding to spin-
only value for an S = 1/2 ground state (g = 2.007, χTIP = 0.394*10-2emu, θ = -0.3 K,
where g value is fixed from the parameters of EPR spectrum).
330 335 340 345 350 355 360
-0,6
-0,4
-0,2
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
dX"/d
B
Exp Sim
B (mT)
335 340 345 3501
0
1
B (mT)
Fig. 6.6.2: X-band EPR spectrum of 12b Exp: T = 9.5 K, ν = 9.64GHz, P = 5.0289 x 10-3 mW, MA = 10 G
Insert, Exp: T = 231.6 K, ν = 9.63GHz, P = 5.028 x 10-3 mW, MA = 1 G. gx= gy = 2.0021, gz = 2.0191.
Chapter 6 139
The X band EPR spectrum of 13b shows an axial signal as shown in Fig.
6.6.4. The simulation yields the following fitting parameters: g║ = 1.9869, g┴ = 2.00.
Lower g values than free radical value and corresponding Mo complex are a consequence
of higher spin-orbit coupling constants. The reason for high spin orbit coupling constants
for heavy elements is due to the higher nuclear charge. The higher spin orbit-coupling
constant also manifests the lowering of the magnetic moment than the expected spin only
value for one unpaired electron.18 Thus, as shown in Fig. 6.6.5 magnetic moment of 1.69
µB in the temperature range of 0 to 130 K is observed for 13b. Other fitting parameters
after simulation are g = 1.99 (fixed from the EPR parameters), χTIP = 0.394*10-2 emu, θ =
-0.22 K. The magnetic moment along with EPR spectrum suggests the S = 1/2 (d1, WV)
ground state to the 13b.
50 100 150 200 250 300
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
Exp. Sim.
µ eff/
µ B
T (K)
Fig.6.6.3: Plot µeff vs. temp. for 12b. The solid line represents the best least squares fitting for the experimental data (circles).
Mo and W complexes 140
320 340 360 380-0,06
-0,04
-0,02
0,00
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,081,81,922,12,2
dX"/d
B
Exp. Sim.
B (mT)Fig. 6.6.4: X-band EPR spectra of 13b
Exp: T = 9.97 K, ν = 9.63GHz, P = 1.006 x 10-3 mW, MA = 10 G gx= gy = 1.9869, gz = 2.00
Fig.6.6.5: Plot µeff vs. temp. for 13b. The solid line represents the best least squares fitting for the experimental data (circles).
50 100 150 200
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
Exp Sim
µ eff
/ µ B
T (K)
Chapter 6 141
6.7 Conclusions
In this chapter [M(tLSS)3]n (M = Mo, W; n = 0, 1) complexes along with
[Mo(tLNS)3] have been studied and it has been found that the oxidation state of +5 is
present for the central metal ion for all these compounds. In contrast to the previous
literature reports viewing the neutral complexes as MVI (d0) configuration, we have found
that the neutral species are MV (d1), which undergo ligand centered redox activities to
produce corresponding monoanionic and monocation species with unchanged oxidation
state of metal ion. The electronic spectra of all compounds contain characteristic ligand to
metal charge transfer bands. The electronic structures of these complexes were elucidated
by a combination of electronic, EPR, X-ray crystallography and magnetic susceptibility
measurements.
As compared to [Cr(tLSS)3]1- (8), the electronic spectra of monoanionic
compounds 11b, 12b and 13b are different. The X-ray structure analyses of these
compounds also show significant differences in bond distances for 8 than other
[M(tLSS)3]1- complexes. Thus, in contrast to the previous suggestions of considering Cr,
Mo and W having a similar oxidation state in similar ligand atmosphere, we conclude that
the metal oxidation states is different in case of 8 than other [M(tLSS)3]1- complexes (M =
Mo, W).
Mo and W complexes 142
6.8 References
1) (a) McCleverty, J. A.; Locke, J.; Wharton, E. J.; Gerloch, M. J. Chem. Soc. (A)
1968, 817. (b) Wharton, E. J.; McCleverty, J. A. J. Chem. Soc. (A) 1969, 2258.(c)
Eisenberg, R. Progr. Inorg. Chem. 1970, 12, 295. (d) Hoyer, E.; Dietzsch, W.;
Schroth, W. Z. Chem. 1971, 11, 41.
2) Cowie, M.; Bennett, M. J. Inorg. Chem. 1976, 15, 1584.
3) (a) Ray, K.; Weyhermüller, T.; Goossens, A.; Crajé, M. W. J.; Wieghardt, K.
Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 4082. (b) Ray, K.; Bill, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5641. (c) Ray, K.; Begum, A.; Weyhermüller,
T.; Piligkos, S.; Slageren, J. V.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 4403.
4) (a) Stiefel, E. I.; Eisenberg, R.; Rosenberg, R.; Gray, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966,
88, 2956.(b) Eisenberg, R.; Stiefel, E. I.; Rosenberg, R.; Gray, H. B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1966, 88, 2874.
5) Smith, A. E.; Schrauzer, G. N.; Mayweg, V. P.; Heinrich, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1965, 87, 5798.
6) Schrauzer, G. N.; Mayweg, V. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 3235.
7) Yamanouchi, K.; Enemark, J. H. Inorg. Chem. 1978, 17, 2911.
8) (a) Herebian, D.; Bothe, E.; Bill, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10012. (b) Herebian, D.; Ghosh, P.; Chun, H.; Bothe, E.;
Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt, K. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 1957. (c) Ghosh, P.;
Bill, E.; Weyhermüller, T.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 1293.
9) (a) Eisenberg, R.; Ibers, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 3776. (b) Pierpont,
C.G.; Eisenberg, R. J. Chem. Soc. (A) 1971, 2285.
10) Cervilla, A.; Llopis, E.; Marco, D.; Pérez, F. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 49, 6525.
11) Huynh, H, V.; Lügger, T.; Hahn, F. E. Eur. J. Inor. Chem. 2002, 3007.
12) Burrow, T.; Morris, R. H. Acta. Cryst. 1993, C49, 1591.
13) Campbell, S.; Harris, S. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 3285.
14) Trogler, W. C. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 697.
Chapter 6 143
15) Kirk, M.; Mcnaughton, R. L.; Helton, M. E. Progr. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 52, 111.
16) Stiefel, E. I.; Brown, G. F. Inorg. Chem. 1972, 11, 434.
17) Gardner, J. K.; Pariyadath, N.; Corbin, J. L.; Stiefel, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 1978, 17,
897.
18) Earnshaw, A. Introduction to magnetochemistry, Acadamic Press; 1968.
19) (a) Marov, I. N.; Balyaeva, V. K.; Ermakov, A. N.; Dubrov, Y. N. Russ. J. Inorg.
Chem. 1969, 14, 1391. (b) Duglav, I. N.; Usmanov, Z. I. Zh. Strukt. Khim. 1975,,
16, 312.
144
Chapter 7 145
7.1 Introduction
As described in the chapter 1, X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) involves the
excitation of core electrons to valence orbitals and to the continuum.1 The resultant
spectrum is typically divided into two regions: 1) the edge region, which is characterized
by a sharp discontinuity resulting from the ionization of a core electron and provides
electronic structural information; and 2) the EXAFS region which occurs after the
electron has been excited to the continuum and is able to interact with neighboring atoms,
thus providing detailed metrical information. In this section, we will focus on the XAS
edge region. Specifically, a combination of metal K- (or metal L-) and ligand K-edge
XAS will be used to provide electronic structural information on a series of Cr, Mo and
W benzodithiolates and Cr catecholates.
The metal K-edge is characterized by an intense electric dipole allowed 1s to 4p
transition. To lower energy, a weak 1s to 3d transition occurs, which is formally electric
dipole forbidden, but may gain intensity through 3d-4p mixing in appropriate
symmetry.2,3 The pre-edge and edge region show oxidation state dependent shifts, and
hence the transition energies may be used to assess oxidation state changes.3,4 The metal
L-edge results from dipole allowed 2p to 3d transition, which will be split into L3 and L2
Chapter 7 XAS of Cr, Mo and W
complexes
XAS
146
edges due to the spin orbit coupling of the 2p hole.5 The energies of the L3 and L2
transitions will vary depending on the electronic structure of the site.6-9 A change in Zeff,
due to a change in oxidation state or in coordination number, will affect the energy of
both the 2p and the 3d orbitals, while a change in the ligand field (which results in a
change in the spitting of the d-manifold) will only affect the 3d orbital energies. The
ligand K-edge, results from a dipole allowed transition from a ligand 1s orbital to a ligand
4p orbital.10,11 In cases where the ligand is bound to an open shell transition metal the
covalent interaction between the ligand 3p orbitals and the metal 3d orbitals, produces
ligand 3p hole character, resulting in a pre-edge transition, the intensity of which will
reflect the covalency of the metal-ligand bond. The energy of a ligand K-edge transition
can provide further electronic structural information. The pre-edge energy is affected by
the energy of the unoccupied (or partially occupied) 3d orbitals (which will have
contributions from the ligand field and Zeff) and the energy of the ligand 1s core. In
addition, the ligand K-edge rising edge energy reflects the chemical shifts in the ligand 1s
core. Thus, by evaluating changes in edge and pre-edge energies, changes in the 3d
orbital energies may be obtained.
7.2 Results and Analysis
Figure 7.1 shows a comparison of the Mo L2 XAS data for [Mo(Lss)3]1-
(12b) and [Mo(Lss)3]0 (12). The essentially identical L2-edge energies reflect a very
similar charge on the Mo in these two complexes. (Note the rise in the background is due
to the fact that the Mo L-edge sits on a strong sulfur background). In contrast, the S K-
edge data (Figure 7.2) show that on going from the monoanionic (12b) to the neutral (12)
complex the sulfur ligand has been oxidized, as evidenced by the shift in the rising edge
energy. In addition, the pre-edge feature splits, going from a single feature at ~2470.8 eV
in the monoanion to two features at 2470.2 eV and 2471.3 eV in the neutral complex.
Based on the similarity of the Mo L-edge data for these two complexes, it is most
reasonable to assume that the higher energy feature in the neutral complex corresponds to
a S 1s transition to a primarily Mo 4d based orbital. The transition is higher in energy in
Chapter 7 147
the neutral 12 than in the monoanionic 12b because the increased effective nuclear charge
on the sulfur moves the sulfur 1s orbital to deeper binding energy and thus increases the
overall transition energy. The lower energy feature at 2470.2 eV is then assigned as a S
1s to S 3p transition, reflecting ligand radical character.
Figure 7.3 shows a comparison of the S K-edge data for [Mo(Lss)3]0 (12) and
[W(Lss)3]0 (13). W L-edge data were obtained, however, no appropriate comparisons are
currently available, and therefore only the S K-edge data are shown. The similar pre-
edge and rising edge structures of the two neutral complexes may argue for a similar
electronic structural description of these two complexes, but this is difficult to judge from
the S K-edge data in isolation. Due to the extreme air sensitive nature of [W(Lss)3]1-
(13b), it was not possible to record its XAS. However the essential similarity in infrared,
X-ray structure and electronic absorption spectra of 12 and 13, and 12b and 13b
respectively, suggest the similarity in the electronic structure of corresponding Mo and W
complexes.
Fig. 7.1: Comparison of the MoL2-edges [Mo(tLSS)3] (12) and [Mo(tLSS)3]1- (12b)
2622 2624 2626 2628 2630 2632 26341.0
1.2
1.4
[Mo(tLSS)3]0
[Mo(tLSS)3]1-
Nor
mal
ized
Abs
orpt
ion
Energy (eV)
XAS
148
Fig. 7.2: Comparison of the S K-edges for [Mo(tLSS)3] (12) and [Mo(tLSS)3]1- (12b)
2464 2466 2468 2470 2472 2474 2476 2478-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Nor
mal
ized
Abs
orpt
ion
Energy (eV)
[Mo(tLSS)3]0
[Mo(tLSS)3]1-
Fig. 7.3: Comparison of the S K-edges for [W(tLSS)3] (13) and [Mo(tLSS)3] (12)
2464 2466 2468 2470 2472 2474 2476 2478
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Nor
mal
ized
Abs
orpt
ion
Energy (eV)
[W(tLSS)3]
[Mo(tLSS)3]
Chapter 7 149
A comparison of the S K-edge XAS data for 12b and [Cr(Lss)3]1- (8) is
shown in Figure 7.4. The appearance of a lower energy pre-edge feature in 8 argues for
the formation of a ligand based radical in the Cr complex that is absent in the Mo
complex.
Figure 7.5 shows a comparison of the Cr K-edge data for [Cr(Lcat)3]0 (10),
[Cr(Lcat)3]1- (10b), [Cr(Lss)3]1- (8), and [CrO(Lss)2]1- (9) with references K2CrO4 (CrVI)
and CrCl3(H2O)6 (CrIII). The similar pre-edge and rising edge positions for the neutral 10
and monoanionic 10b complexes indicate that the effective nuclear charge in these two
complexes is similar. Comparison to Cr K-edge data of known oxidation state (Figure
7.5) appear to be most consistent with an oxidation state assignment of Cr(III). At this
point, Lay et al.13 have different judgment. They have recorded XANES in the spectra of
[Cr(LCat)3]n- complexes (n = 1-3) during the in situ electrochemical XAS (295K). They
have noticed small increase in the edge energies (6002.9 vs 6002.4 eV) and in the
Fig. 7.4: Comparison of S K-edges for [Cr(tLSS)3]1- (8) and [Mo(tLSS)3]1- (12b)
2464 2466 2468 2470 2472 2474 2476 2478
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Nor
mal
ized
Abs
orpt
ion
Energy (eV)
[Cr(tLSS)3]1-
[Mo(tLSS
)3]1-
XAS
150
intensities of pre-edge peaks for [Cr(LCat)3]2-/1- relative to the [Cr(LCat)3]3-. This shift in
the edge position by about 0.5eV has been attributed to metal centered oxidations. Thus
in their point of view the oxidation state of metal changes from +3 to +5, going from
[Cr(LCat)3]3- to [Cr(LCat)3]1- which lead to the +6 oxidation state to the neutral compound.
As we have clearly seen in our case that there is no change in the Cr K-edges in neutral
and monoanionic species and they are consistent with the reference CrIII species, the +6
assignment done by Lay et al. is erroneous.
The metal K-edge for [Cr(Lss)3]1- (8) appears at 0.5 eV lower in energy
than the reference CrIII, 10 and 10b, indicating a less effective nuclear charge (+2
oxidation state). The comparison of Cr K- pre-edge and edge data for 9 and 8 indicate
that 9 has a greater effective nuclear charge than 8 based on the pre-edge energy position.
A comparison of Cr K-edge data of 9 is similar to that reported in the literature for CrV
complexes,14 which is in agreement with the infrared and X-ray crystallographic
assignment of +5 oxidation state to this compound. Note that due to shakedown
contributions to the rising edge region (which will generally be more significant for sulfur
based ligands than for oxygen ligands) are difficult to compare.
Chapter 7 151
5980 5990 6000 6010 6020 60300.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4N
orm
aliz
ed A
bsor
ptio
n
Energy (eV)
[Cr(tLSS)3]1-
[CrO(tLSS)3]1-
[Cr(tLCat)3]
[Cr(tLCat)3]1-
K2CrO4
CrCl3(H2O)6
Fig. 7.5: Comparison of Cr K-edges for 8, 9, 10 and 11 with references K2CrO4 and CrCl3(H2O)6
5988 5990 5992 5994 5996 59980.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 [Cr(tLSS)3]
1-
[CrO(tLSS)3]1-
[Cr(tLCat)3]
[Cr(tLCat)3]1-
K2CrO4
CrCl3(H2O)6
Nor
mal
ized
Abs
orpt
ion
Energy (eV)
XAS
152
Figure 7.6 compares the S K-edge XAS data for [Cr(Lss)3]1- and
[CrO(Lss)2]1-. Based on the rising edge energies, the sulfur is clearly more oxidized in the
[Cr(Lss)3]1- complex than in the [CrO(Lss)2]1- complex. This is consistent with the
formation of a ligand radical in the former, but not in the latter.
2464 2466 2468 2470 2472 2474 2476 24780.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Nor
mal
ized
Abs
orpt
ion
Energy (eV)
[CrO(tLSS)3]1-
[Cr(tLSS
)3]1-
Fig. 7.6: Comparison of S K-edges for [Cr(tLSS)3]1- (8) and [CrO(tLSS)2]1- (9)
Chapter 7 153
7.3 Conclusions
The XAS studies on the neutral Mo and W complexes coordinated to tris-
o-dithiolene clearly show the presence of one dithiobezosemiquinonate (1-) radical and
its absence in the monoanionic Mo complex in agreement with the results of the other
spectroscopic studies done on these complexes (chapter 6). Comparison of the
monoanionic species of Cr and Mo reveals that the electronic structures of these species
are different: in the first case a dithiobezosemiquinonate (1-) radical ligand is present and
in the second case it is not.
However, the situation is a little more complicated for the [Cr(LSS)3]1- (8),
[Cr(tLCat)3] (10) and [Cr(LCat)3]1- (10b) species. While the metal K-edge for 8 appears at
0.5 eV less than the reference CrIII compound, the metal K-edges of 10 and 10b appear
almost at the same position as compared to the reference CrIII. In contrast with this, the
electronic absorption spectra of electrochemically oxidized and reduced forms of 8 and
10 are correspondingly identical (chapter 5). Thus, while the metal K-edge data for the 8
points toward a CrII assignment, IR spectroscopy, X-ray crystallography and electronic
absorption spectroscopy (chapter 5) correlate best with that of a CrIII assignment. In the
case of 9, the metal is clearly more oxidized than 8, consistent with the +5 oxidation state
of the metal and absence of a ligand radical.
XAS
154
7.4 References
1) Koningsberger, D. C.; Prins, R. X-ray Absorption: Principles, Applications,
Techniques of EXAFS, SEXAFS, and XANES; John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New
York, 1988.
2) Shadle, S. E.; Penner-Hahn, J. E.; Schugar, H. J.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.;
Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 767.
3) Westre, T. E.; Kennepohl, P.; DeWitt, J. G.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.;
Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6297.
4) DuBois, J. L.; Mukherjee, P.; Solomon, E. I.; Stack, T. D. P.; Hodgson, K. O. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5775.
5) Fuggle, J. C. Phys. Scrp. 1987, T17, 64.
6) George, S. J.; Lowery, M. D.; Solomon, E. I.; Cramer, S. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 2968.
7) Cramer, S. P.; deGroot, F. M. F.; Ma, Y.; Chen, C. T.; Sette, F.; Kipke, C. A.;
Eichhorn, D. M.; Chan, M. K.; Armstrong, W. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
7937.
8) DeBeer George, S.; Basumallick, L.; Szilagyi, R. K.; Randall, D. W.; Hill, M. G.;
Nersissian, A. M.; Valentine, J. S.; Hedmann, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Solomon, E. I.
2003, submitted for publication.
9) Wasinger, E. C.; deGroot, F. M. F.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Solomon, E. I.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12894.
10) Solomon, E. I.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Dey, A.; Szilagyi, R. K. Coord.
Chem. Rev. 2004, in press.
11) Glaser, T.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Solomon, E. I. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000,
33, 859.
Chapter 7 155
12) Hedman, B.; Frank, P.; Gheller, S. F.; Roe, A. L.; Newton, W. E.; Hodgson, K. O.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3798.
13) Levina, A.; Foran, G. J.; Pattison, D. I.; Lay, P. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 462.
14) Pattison, D. I.; Levina, A.; Davies, M. J.; G. J.; Lay, P. A. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40,
214.
156
Chapter 8 157
The coordination chemistry of transition metals with bidentate ligands
derived from o-aminothiophenolate, o-dithiolate and o-catacholate has been studied in
this work. The ligands used were:
1) o-aminothiophenol [LNS]
2) 2-Phenylbenzothiazoline [LPh]
3) 2-mercapto-3,5-di-tert-butylaniline H2[tLNS]
4) 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-benzenedithiol H2[tLSS]
5) 3,6-di-tert-butylcatacholate H2[tLCat]
Twenty-two transition metal complexes of these ligands have been
synthesized and characterized spectroscopically. Seventeen complexes among them have
been structurally characterized. These ligands were readily one-electron oxidized yielding
N,S-, S,S- and O,O-coordinated π radical anions. In this work, we have shown that the
spectroscopic oxidation states in transition metal complexes coordinated to these ligands
could be assigned by the combination of crystallographic and spectroscopic methods. The
main outcomes of the study are listed below:
Chapter 8 Summary
Summary
158
Chapter 2
The complexes [As(Ph)4] [Co(LNS)2] (1) and [N(n-Bu)4] [Co(LNS)2] (2)
have been fully characterized structurally, electrochemically and by magnetic
measurements in order to show that these species contain a central CoIII (d6, S=1) metal
ion. The cyclic voltammograms of 1 and 2 show reversible one-electron waves
corresponding to oxidation of a ligand and irreversible waves corresponding to a one
electron reduction of the cobalt. The absorption spectra of the complexes contain intense
LMCT bands occurring in the visible region (< 700 nm). The ground state of the
complexes has been shown to be a spin triplet, in which the degeneracy is lifted by large
positive zero field splitting. A zero field splitting (+41 cm-1) for complex 2 has been
measured independently by magnetic moment measurement, variable-temperature and
variable field SQUID magnetometry, and far-infrared absorption. These studies have
clarified the ambiguity surrouding the proper formalism of the monoanionic cobalt
complex, and therefore it is possible to assign this complex properly as [CoIII(LNSIP)2]1-.
Chapter 3
The reported compounds Na[Cr(tLNS)3(OEt)3(µ-OMe)4(OHEt)4] (3),
Na[Cr(tLNS)3(OMe)3(µ-OMe)4(OHMe)3] (4a) and Na [Cr(tLNS)3(OMe)3(µ-
OMe)4(OH2)3] (4b) are archetypal CrIII cuboidal clusters with a N,S- coordination.
Methoxy bridges are an additional feature of these cuboidal complexes. The structural
features of 3, 4a, and 4b demonstrate that the ligand, 2-mercapto-3, 5-di-tert-butylaniline
exists in o-iminothiobenzosemiquinonato (1-) π–radical form, which verifies the
noninnocent nature of o-aminothiophenolato ligands. Magnetic behaviour of these
complexes show antiferromagnetic exchange coupling between three S = 1 spins, giving
a singly non-degenerate S = 0 ground state and thus making these clusters very
exceptional examples of S = 1 spin-triangles having three equal J values.
Chapter 4
In this study the crystal structure properties as well as the electrochemical,
spectroscopic and magnetic behavior of [Ni(ddbt)] (5), [Co(Cp)2][Ni(ddbt)] (5b),
[Co(ddbt)] (6), [Co(Cp)2][Co(ddbt)] (6b) and [Zn(phbt)2] (7) have been fully
Chapter 8 159
characterized. As pointed out in the introduction, it has been verified by low temperature
crystallography of 5, 6, 5b and 6b that the metal ions in analogous tetra coordinated
cobalt and nickel complexes exist in different oxidation levels. Thus, in the neutral and
monoanionic nickel complexes 5 and 5b, the central nickel has a NiII (d8) electron
configuration, where the HOMO are predominantly ligand centered. On the other hand, in
the case of the neutral cobalt complex (6), the observed ligand bond lengths clearly
suggest a CoIII (d6) electron configuration. In the monoanion 6b, the ligand bond
distances indicate dianionic form of ligands leading to a spin triplet ground state for 6b.
The DFT calculations on the similar compounds suggested two possibilities, namely:
CoIII (d6), or CoII (d7) coordinated to a ligand radical, though the structural features of 6b
point toward CoIII (d6) configuration. The degeneracy of the ground state of 6b is lifted
by large positive zero field splitting of 36.67 cm-1, which has been measured
independently by magnetic moment measurement, variable-temperature and variable field
and far-infrared absorption.
The absorption spectra of the neutral and electrochemically-generated
species show several charge transfer bands. Intense LLCT bands occurring in the visible
region are a significant feature of the spectra of complexes containing two radical
ligands. Spectra of complexes containing only one radical ligand contain IVCT bands in
the near infrared region. The EPR parameters for 6 and 5b show that spin-orbit coupling
plays a role in the deviation of the g value from the free radical value. These radical
stabilized complexes have proven the non-innocent nature of the o-aminothiophenolate
ligands, thus disproving the proposed valence isomer structure reported in the literature
for the assignment of the oxidation level for ligands.
Chapter 5
We have shown in this chapter that oxidation states of higher than +3 for
the central chromium ion are not present in the tris-(o-benzene-dithiolato) [N(n-
Bu)4][Cr(tLSS)3] (8) and tris-(o-benzocatacholato) chromium [Cr(tLCat)3] (10)
[Co(Cp)2][Cr(tLCat)3] (10b) complexes. In contrast to earlier literature reports, we
Summary
160
have not found spectroscopic evidence for the occurrence of chromium(IV),
chromium(V) and chromium(VI). The electronic structures of the resulting complexes are
often complicated and were elucidated by a combination of electronic, EPR, X-ray
crystallography and magnetic susceptibility measurements.
In the complex [N(n-Bu)4] [CrO(tLSS)2] (9), chromium was found in the
higher oxidation state of (+5) which was confirmed by the EPR parameters, and the
existence of the Cr=O bond was confirmed by infrared spectroscopy and X-ray
crystallography.
Chapter 6
In this chapter [M(tLSS)3]n (M = Mo, W; n = 0, 1) (12, 12b, 13, 13b)
complexes along with [Mo(tLNS)3] (11) have been studied and it has been found that the
oxidation state of +5 is present for the central metal ion for all these compounds. In
contrast to the previous literature reports viewing the neutral complexes as MVI (d0)
configuration, we have found that the neutral species are MV (d1), which undergo ligand
centered redox activities to produce corresponding monoanionic and monocation species
with an unchanged oxidation state of the metal ion. The electronic spectra of all
compounds contain characteristic ligand to metal charge transfer bands. The electronic
structures of these complexes were elucidated by a combination of electronic, EPR, X-ray
crystallography and magnetic susceptibility measurements.
As compared to [Cr(tLSS)3]1- (8), the electronic spectra of monoanionic
compounds 11b, 12b and 13b are quite different. The X-ray structure analyses of these
compounds also show significant differences in bond distances for 8 than other
[M(tLSS)3]1- complexes. Thus, in contrast to previous suggestions considering Cr, Mo and
W as having a similar oxidation state in a similar ligand atmosphere, we conclude that the
metal oxidation states is different in the case of 8 than other [M(tLSS)3]1- complexes (M =
Mo, W).
Chapter 8 161
Chapter 7
The XAS studies on the neutral Mo and W complexes coordinated to tris-
o-dithiolene clearly showed the presence of dithiobezosemiquinonate (1-) radical and its
absence in the monoanionic Mo complex; in agreement with the results of the other
spectroscopic studies done on these complexes (chapter 6). Comparison of the
monoanionic species of Cr and Mo reveal that the electronic structures of these species
are different: in the first case dithiobezosemiquinonate (1-) radical ligand is present and
in second case it is not.
However, the situation is a little more complicated for the [Cr(LSS)3]1- (8),
[Cr(tLCat)3] (10) and [Cr(LCat)3]1- (10b) species. While the metal K-edge for 8 appears at
0.5 eV less than the reference CrIII compound, the metal K-edges of 10 and 10b appear
almost at the same position as compared to the reference CrIII. In contrast with this, the
electronic absorption spectra of electrochemically oxidized and reduced forms of 8 and
10 are correspondingly identical (chapter 5). Thus, while the metal K-edge data for the 8
points toward a CrII assignment, IR spectroscopy, X-ray crystallography and electronic
absorption spectroscopy (chapter 5) correlate best with that of a CrIII assignment. In the
case of 9, the metal is clearly more oxidized than 8, consistent with the +5 oxidation state
of the metal and the absence of a ligand radical.
162
Chapter 9 163
9.1 Synthetic procedures
The ligand 3,6-di-tert-butylcatacholate H2[LCat]1 and [MoO2(acac)2]2 were synthesized as
described in the literature. 2-Aminobenzenethiol; H2[LNS] is commercially available.
Ligand synthesis:
1) 2-mercapto-3,5-di-tert-butylaniline H2[tLNS]3
a) 3,5- di- tert-butylaniline (L1.1)
3,5-di-tert-butylbenzoic acid (5 g, 22 mmol) was dissolved in conc. H2SO4 (15 ml) and
CHCl3 (15 ml). At 45 °C, over a period of an hour, NaN3 (1.5 g, 23 mmol) was added and
the reaction mixture was then stirred for 5 hours. The CHCl3 was removed by evaporation
(rotary evaporator). The residue was cooled (0 °C) and ice water (150 ml) was added. The
precipitate was filtered and washed with water (100 ml). This precipitate of 3,5-di- tert-
butylanilinesulphate was dissolved in MeOH (25 ml) and KOH (5 g in 100 ml H2O) was
NH2COOH HN
SNH2
NH2
SH
(L1.1) (L1.2) H2[tLNS]
a b c
Chapter 9 Experimental
Experimental
164
added. The precipitate was filtered and washed with large amount of water. The product
was dried in air.
Yield: 4.3 g (98%)
Molecular weight: 205 g /mol
b) 5,7-di- tert-butyl-2-benzothiazolamine (L1.2)
3,5-di- tert-butylaniline (L1.1) (4.5 g, 22 mmol) and KSCN (3.9 g, 40 mmol) were
dissolved in conc. CH3COOH (40 ml). 1 ml of Br2 (3.1 g, 22 mmol) in acetic acid (10
ml) was added dropwise and the reaction mixture was stirred for 2 hours. The acetic acid
was removed by evaporation with water suction. The residue was suspended in MeOH
(75 ml) and made alkaline with KOH (4 g in 25 ml water). The product precipitated on
addition of H2O (100 ml). The product was filtered, washed with water and dried under
air.
Yield: 4.6 g (80.7 %)
Molecular weight: 262 g/mol
c) 2-mercapto-3,5-di- tert-butylaniline H2[tLNS]
5,7-di- tert-butyl-2-benzothiazolamine (L1.2) (4.5 g, 17 mmol) and KOH (30 g, 550
mmol) were dissolved in 2,3-butanediol (40 ml). This mixture was refluxed under an
argon atmosphere for 3 hours at 200 °C. To the hot reaction mixture acetic acid (50 ml)
and H2O (100 ml) were added and the solution was allowed to cool to room temperature.
The reaction mixture was extracted with Et2O (ca. 150 ml) and the solvent was removed
under reduced pressure. The yield was a yellow/brown oil, which is 2-mercapto-3,5-di-
tert-butyl-aniline. It has been used for the synthesis of complexes without further
purification.
Yield: 3.9 g (95.6%)
Molecular weight: 237 g/mol
Chapter 9 165
Infrared spectrum:
2) 2-Phenylbenzothiazoline (Lph)4
2-Aminobenzenethiol (1.25 g, 10 mmol) was added to a solution of benzaldehyde (1.06 g,
10 mmol) in ethanol (20 ml) and stirred at ca. 70°C for 20 minutes. After cooling to room
temperature a yellowish product precipitated, which was collected by filtration.
Yield: 1.50 g (70 %)
Molecular weight: 213 g/mol
NH2
SH S H
HN Ph
500100015002000250030003500
3476
2925
2591
1603
1459
1244
1054853
661
w aven u m b er (cm -1 )
rel.
Tran
smis
sion
Fig. 9.1: IR spectrum of 2-mercapto-3,5-di-tert-butylaniline H2[tLNS]
Experimental
166
Infrared spectrum:
3) 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-benzenedithiol, H2[tLSS]5
a) 3,5-di- tert-butyl-2-nitrobenzoic acid (L3.1)
3,5 di-tert-butylbenzoic acid (10 g, 42.6mmol) was dissolved in 70 ml of conc. H2SO4
and cooled in an ice bath. To the solution a mixture of 14 ml of conc. HNO3, NaNO2 (120
COOHCOOH
S
S
NO2
COOH
NH2
H
BF4 SH
SH
a b
c d
Fig. 9.2: IR spectrum of 2-Phenylbenzothiazoline (Lph)
500100015002000250030003500
3382
3063
1584
1471
1255
1027
697
rel.
Tran
smis
ion
w avenum ber (cm -1)
Chapter 9 167
mg, 17.4 mmol) and 14 ml conc. H2SO4 were added dropwise with constant stirring. The
temperature was kept below 0 oC during the addition. Stirring was continued below 0 oC
for 15 minutes and afterwards at room temperature for 30 minutes. Then the mixture was
poured into ice and the precipitate that formed was collected by filtration, washed with
water and air-dried.
Yield: 11.8 g (98.6%)
Molecular weight: 280.34 g/mol
b) 3,5-di- tert-butylanthranilic acid (L3.2)
Dry 3,5-di- tert-butyl, 2-nitrobenzoic acid (L3.1) (11.8 g, 42 mmol) was dissolved in 100
ml methanol. Pd/C catalyst (1.2 g) and HCOONH4 (9 g, 142 mmol) were added under an
argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred for 4 hrs and then the solution was
filtered through celite. The filtrate was put under rotary evaporator and then 10 ml of
water was added, the product was extracted with ether. The ether layer was concentrated
giving a yellow crystalline compound.
Yield: 6.5g. (64%)
Molecular weight: 250 g/mol
c) 3,5-di-tert-butylanthranilic acid (L3.2) (6.5 g, 26 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of
THF (2ml) dioxane (10ml) and added dropwise to a refluxing solution of 1,2
dichloroethane (70 ml), distilled CS2 (13 ml), isoamylalcohol (4.6 ml), and
isopentylnitrite (4 ml) at 40°C. The solution was refluxed from 40-80°C for 0.5 hour. The
solvent was removed under vacuum. The resulting yellowish brown oil was dissolved in a
minimum amount of ether, treated with charcoal and filtered. The filtrate was treated with
HBF4 (7.6 ml 50% in ether, 42 mmol) solution at -30°C in absence of light. A white
precipitate of compound L3.3 formed after 2-3 hours which was filtered off, washed with
ether, stored in the dark and was used immediately.
Experimental
168
d) 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-benzenedithiol, H2[tLSS]
Ammonia (250 ml) was liquefied at –78°C. To it compound L3.3 was added while the
ammonia was warming up to room temperature. Sodium pieces were added until the blue
color of the solution persisted. The solution was kept stirring under argon until the
ammonia is evaporated. The residue was treated with ice-cold water and conc. HCl, and
the pH of the solution was adjusted to 2. This solution was extracted with diethyl ether
and the ether was evaporated under vacuum. A yellowish oily residue was obtained as the
final product.
Yield: 2.6 g (40 %)
Molecular weight: 254.44 g/mol
Infrared spectrum:
Fig. 9.3: IR spectrum of 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-benzenedithiol
5 0 01 0 0 01 5 0 02 0 0 02 5 0 03 0 0 0
2 9 6 3
2 5 2 6
1 3 9 5
1 2 6 01 0 4 4 7 9 9
re
l. Tr
ansm
issi
on
w a v e n u m b e r (c m -1 )
Chapter 9 169
[As(Ph)4] [Co(LNS)2] (1)
Potassium metal (600 mg, 15 mmol) was carefully dissolved in absolute ethanol (25 ml).
Under argon 2-aminobenzenethiol (920 mg, 7 mmol) was added, followed by the addition
of a solution of CoCl2.6H2O (0.80 g, 3.5 mmol) in ethanol (5 ml) and the [As(Ph)4]Cl
(1.46 g, 3.5 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred in air for 15 minutes. The dark blue
precipitate was filtered off and washed with absolute ethanol and dry diethyl ether.
Yield: 1.27 g (50.19 %)
Molecular weight: 688.15
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C36 H30 As Co N2 S2 % C % H % N
Calculated 62.79 4.36 3.94
Found 62.55 4.60 4.06
Fig. 9.4: IR spectrum of [As(Ph)4] [Co(LNS)2](1)
5 0 01 0 0 01 5 0 02 0 0 02 5 0 03 0 0 0
10 0 8
4 8 9
1 0 7912 9 9
16 3 3
74 51 4 41
rel.
Tran
smis
sion
w a v e n u m b e r (c m -1 )
Experimental
170
[N(n-Bu)4] [Co(LNS)2] (2)
Potassium metal (600 mg, 15 mmol) was dissolved in absolute ethanol (25 ml). Under
argon 2-aminobenzenethiol (920 mg, 7 mmol) was added, followed by the addition of a
solution of CoCl2.6H2O (0.80 g, 3.5 mmol) in absolute ethanol (5 ml) and [N(n-Bu)4]Br
(1.12 g, 3.5mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred in air for 15 minutes. The dark blue
precipitate was filtered off and washed with absolute ethanol and dry diethyl ether.
Yield: 2.1g (52.15 %)
Molecular weight: 547.73
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C28 H46 Co N3 S2 % C % H % N % Co
Calculated 61.39 8.46 7.67 10.75
Found 61.26 8.72 7.74 10.65
5 0 01 0 0 01 5 0 02 0 0 02 5 0 03 0 0 0
rel.
Tran
smis
sion
W a v e n u m b e r (c m -1)
1 46 7
7 52
1 12 1
15 81
3 03 932 38
Fig. 9.5: IR spectrum of [N(n-Bu)4][Co(LNS)2] (2)
Chapter 9 171
Na[Cr(tLNS)3(OEt)3(µ-OMe)4(OHEt)4] (3)
Na (46 mg, 2mmol) was dissolved in distilled MeOH (25ml) under argon. To this
solution, the ligand 2-mercapto-3,5-di- tert-butylaniline (237 mg, 1 mmol) was added and
the mixture was stirred for 10 minutes under argon. Vacuum dried CrIICl2 ( 625 mg, 0.5
mmol ) was added and stirring continued for 1 hour. A flow of air was passed through
this reaction mixture for 2 minutes. The color of the reaction changed from green to
brown. The reaction mixture was filtered off and the solvent was removed under vacuum.
The brown compound was redissolved in EtOH.. Dark green crystals of the product
appeared after the slow evaporation of the solvent.
Yield: 1.08 g (50 %)
Molecular weight: 1279.6 g/mol
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C58 H105 Cr3 N3 Na O10 S3 % C % H % N
Calculated 54.31 8.48 3.27
Found 54.18 8.40 3.26
Fig. 9.6: IR spectrum of Na [Cr(tLNS)3(OEt)3(µ-OMe)4(OHEt)4]
5 0 01 00 015 0 02 0 0 02 5 003 0 003 50 040 0 0
3439
2962
1458 1079
703
526
rel.
Tran
smis
sion
w aven u m b er (cm -1)
3283
2787
Experimental
172
Na[Cr3(tLNS)3(OMe)3(µ-OMe)4(OHMe)3] (4a)
Na[Cr3(tLNS)3(OMe)3(µ-OMe)4(OH2)3] (4b)
Na (46 mg, 2 mmol) was dissolved in distilled MeOH (25 ml) under argon. To this
solution, the ligand 2-mercapto-3,5-di- tert-butyl-aniline (237 mg, 1 mmol) was added
and the mixture was stirred for 10 minutes under argon. Vacuum dried CrIICl2 (625 mg,
0.5 mmol) was added and the stirring was continued for 1 hour. A flow of air was then
passed through the reaction mixture for 2 minutes. The reaction mixture was filtered off
and the solvent was removed under vacuum. The brown compound was redissolved in
MeOH. Dark brown crystals of product appeared after slow evaporation of the solvent.
Yield: 1.00 g (50 %)
Molecular weight: 2354.9 g/mol
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C101 H186 Cr6 N6 Na2 O20 S6 % C % H % N % Cr
Calculated 51.47 7.89 3.57 13.25
Found 51.28 7.76 3.47 13.15
500100015002000250030003500
rel.
Tran
smis
sion
w aven u m b er (cm -1 )
2966
1026
1632
528
797
3444
Fig. 9.7: IR spectrum of 4a and 4b
Chapter 9 173
[Ni(ddbt)] (5)
[Ni(phbt)2] (phbt = bis-(2-phenylmethyleneamino)benzenethiolato) was synthesized as
described in the literature.5 A suspension of [Ni(phbt)2] (960 mg, 20 mmol) in toluene (30
ml) was heated for 20 minutes and then cooled to room temperature. After filtering the
solvent was removed on the rotary evaporator. The black crystalline product was
dissolved in CH2Cl2 (ca. 15 ml) and filtered. The filtrate was purified by chromatography
on silica gel (230-400 mesh) column eluting with CH2Cl2. A dark violet crystalline
[Ni(ddbt)], (ddbt = bis-2,2'-(1,2-diphenylethylenediimine)benzenethiolato) was obtained
by evaporation of the solvent.
Yield: 540 mg (56%)
Molecular weight: 483.27 g/mol
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C26 H20 N2 Ni S2 % C % H % N
Calculated 64.61 4.17 5.80
Found 63.81 3.91 5.57
Fig. 9.8: IR spectrum of [Ni(ddbt)] (5)
5 0 01 0 0 01 5 0 02 0 0 02 5 0 03 0 0 0
11 43
74 5
1 0511 31 2
14 23
rel.
Tran
smis
sion
w a ve n u m b e r (c m -1 )
1 5 9 7
Experimental
174
[Co(Cp)2][Ni(ddbt)] (5b)
To a deep violet solution of [Ni(ddbt)] (242 mg, 0.5 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (25 ml)
cobaltocene (95 mg, 0.5 mmol) was added under argon atmosphere. The solution was
then stirred at room temperature for 3 hours; a green precipitate was isolated by filtration
and washed with diethyl ether. Crystals suitable for X-ray crystal structure analysis were
grown by the slow evaporation of mixture of MeCN and MeOH.
Yield: 230 mg (70%)
Molecular weight: 672.28 g/mol
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C36H30Co N2 Ni S2 % C % H % N
Calculated 64.30 4.49 4.16
Found 63.88 4.51 5.14
Fig. 9.9: IR spectrum of [Co(Cp)2][Ni(ddbt)] (5b)
5 0 01 0 0 01 5 0 02 0 0 02 5 0 03 0 0 0
1413
738
1306
rel.
Tran
smis
sion
W a ven u m b er (c m -1 )
Chapter 9 175
[Co(ddbt)] (6)
[Co(phbt)2] (phbt = bis-(2-phenylmethyleneamino)benzenethiolato) was synthesized as
described in the literature.5 A suspension of [Co(phbt)2] (215 mg, 0.45 mmol) in toluene
(30 ml) was heated for 30 minutes. The solution turned dark greenish blue. The solution
was filtered and the solvent was removed on the rotary evaporator. The dark blue solid
was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and filtered. Then the product was purified by chromatography
on silica gel (230-400 mesh) column with CH2Cl2. The complex was eluted as a first blue
band. Removal of CH2Cl2 under reduced pressure yielded the metallic red-purple
powdery product of [Co(ddbt)], (ddbt = bis-2,2'-(1,2-
diphenylethylenediimine)benzenethiolato). X-ray quality crystals were grown by slow
evaporation of mixture of CH2Cl2 and MeOH.
Yield: 110 mg (50%)
Molecular weight: 483.49 g/mol
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C26 H20Co N2 S2 %C %H %N %Co
Calculated 64.58 4.17 5.80 12.25
Found 64.38 4.06 5.59 12.20
Fig. 9.10: IR spectrum of [Co(ddbt)](6)
4 0 08 0 01 2 0 01 6 0 02 0 0 02 4 0 02 8 0 0
1 0 9 75 3 6
7 4 7
1 6 3 11 4 2 6
1 2 6 1
1 0 3 7
rel.
Tran
smis
sion
W a v e n u m b e r (c m -1 )
Experimental
176
[Co(Cp)2]( [Co(ddbt)] (6b)
To a deep blue solution of [Co(ddbt)] (242 mg, 0.5 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (25 ml) under an
argon atmosphere was added cobaltocene (95 mg, 0.5 mmol). After the solution was
stirred at room temperature for 1 hour, a violet precipitate formed, which was isolated by
filtration. Single crystals suitable for X-ray crystal structure analysis were grown by the
solvent evaporation from a mixture of MeCN and MeOH.
Yield: 260 mg (80%)
Molecular weight: 672.38 g/mol
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C36 H30 Co2 N2 S2 %C %H %N
Calculated 64.29 4.46 4.17
Found 64.18 4.42 4.16
Fig.9.11: IR spectrum of [Co(ddbt)][Co(Cp)2](6b)
5 0 01 0 0 01 5 0 02 0 0 02 5 0 03 0 0 0
1 5 6 2
1 0 3 7
7 4 51 2 9 9
1 4 4 8
rel.
Tran
smis
sion
w a v e n u m b e r (c m -1 )
Chapter 9 177
[Zn(phbt)2] (7)
Zinc acetate (1.09 g, 5 mmol) was added to a refluxing solution of 2-
phenylbezothiazoline (2.13 g, 10 mmol) in MeOH (50ml). After stirring for 0.5 hour, an
orange precipitate was filtered off and washed with MeOH and diethyl ether. X-ray
quality crystals of [Zn(phbt)2] (phbt = bis-(2-phenylmethyleneamino)benzenethiolato)
were obtained by re-dissolving this complex in a mixture of dichloromethane and
methanol and slow evaporation of the solvents.
Yield: 1.71g (70%)
Molecular weight: 489.93 g/mol
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C26 H20 N2 S2 Zn % C % H % N
Calculated 63.68 4.08 5.71
Found 63.74 4.15 5.78
Fig. 9.12: IR spectrum of [Zn(phbt)] (7)
5 0 01 0 0 01 5 0 02 0 0 02 5 0 03 0 0 0
2 9 6 4
1 5 6 1
1 4 3 8
1 0 8 1
7 4 5
rel.
Tran
smis
sion
w a v e n u m b e r (c m -1 )
Experimental
178
[N(n-Bu)4][Cr(tLSS)3] (8)
To a solution of the ligand 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-benzenedithiol, H2[tLSS] (0.126 g, 0.5
mmol) in 25 ml MeCN, CrCl3(THF)3 (46 mg, 0.125 mmol) was added followed by the
addition of Et3N (0.3 ml, 3mmol) under argon. After one hour, air was passed through the
solution for 10 minutes. As a consequence color of the reaction mixture turned to violet
from green. [N(n-Bu)4]Br was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for another one
hour. Violet crystals of [N(n-Bu)4] [Cr(tLSS)3] were obtained from the solution at low
temperature (-20 °C) which were separated by filtration.
Yield: 71 mg (55%)
Molecular weight: 1050 g/mol
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C58 H96 Cr N S6 %C %H %S %Cr
Calculated 66.96 9.20 18.29 4.94
Found 65.96 9.10 18.33 4.87
Fig.9.13: IR spectrum of [N(n-Bu)4][Cr(tLSS)3] (8)
5 0 01 0 0 01 5 0 02 0 0 02 5 0 03 0 0 0
8 6 3
1 0 3 4
1 3 8 41 4 7 9
1 1 1 71 6 3 7
2 9 6 6
w a v e n u m b e r (c m -1 )
rel.
Tran
smis
sion
Chapter 9 179
[As(Ph)4] [CrO(tLSS)2] (9)
To a solution of the ligand 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-benzenedithiol (126 mg, 0.5 mmol) in 25
ml MeCN, CrCl3(THF)3 (93 mg, 0.25 mmol) was added followed by the addition of Et3N
(0.3 ml, 3mmol) under argon. After one hour stirring, air was passed through reaction
mixture for 1 hour. During this time color of the reaction mixture changed from green to
red-brown. Subsequently [As(Ph)4]Br was added and reaction mixture stirred for another
one hour. The solvent was evaporated by slow evaporation. During this time brown
crystalline [As(Ph)4] [CrO(LSS)2] was obtained.
Yield: 85mg (60%)
Molecular weight: 572 g/mol
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C56 H66AsCrN2OS4 %C %H %S % Cr
Calculated 64.78 6.41 12.35 5.00
Found 64.01 5.82 12.21 4.89
Fig. 9.14: IR spectrum of [As(Ph)4] [CrO(tLSS)2] (9)
5 0 01 0 0 01 5 0 02 0 0 02 5 0 03 0 0 0
1 3 8 4 9 6 6
1 6 3 7
7 3 9
2 9 5 3
w a v e n u m b e r (c m -1 )
rel.
Tran
smis
sion
Experimental
180
[Cr(tLcat)3] (10)
To a solution of the ligand 3,6-di-tert-butyl-catacholate (110 mg, 0.5 mmol) in 25 ml
MeCN, CrCl3(THF)3 (62 mg, 0.166 mmol) was added, followed by the addition of Et3N
(0.2 ml, 2mmol). Reaction mixture was refluxed for 1 hour in air. In the course of
reaction the color of the reaction mixture turned to red-purple. The reaction mixture was
kept for slow evaporation through which crystalline complex [Cr(tLCat)3] was obtained.
Yield: 106 mg (90%)
Molecular weight: 712 g/mol
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C42H60 CrO6 %C %H %N
Calculated 70.75 8.48 7.29
Found 70.65 8.48 7.37
Fig. 9.15: IR spectrum of [Cr(tLcat)3] (10)
50010001500200025003000
2947
1555
1413
646823
966
re
l. Tr
ansm
issi
on
w avenum ber (cm -1)
Chapter 9 181
[Co(Cp)2][Cr(tLcat)3] (10b)
To a deep violet solution of [Cr(tLcat)3] (178 mg, 0.25 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (25 ml) under
argon atmosphere was added cobaltocene (48 mg, 0.25 mmol). After the solution was
stirred at room temperature for 3 hours, a blue precipitate formed was isolated by
filtration and washed with diethyl ether. Crystals suitable for X-ray crystal structure
analysis were grown by the evaporation of mixture of MeCN and MeOH.
Yield: 185 mg (85%)
Molecular weight: 901 g/mol
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C52H70 CrO6Co % C % H % O % Cr
Calculated 69.24 7.82 10.64 5.76
Found 69.07 7.14 10.45 5.73
Fig. 9.16: IR spectrum of [Co(Cp)2] [Cr(tLcat)3] (10b)
5 0 01 0 0 01 5 0 02 0 0 02 5 0 03 0 0 0
1 5 5 3
1 6 5 2
1 2 6 27 9 9
1 0 9 7
2 9 5 9
w a v e n u m b e r (c m -1 )
rel.T
rans
mis
sion
Experimental
182
[Mo(tLNS)3] (11)
To a solution of the ligand 2-mercapto-3,5-di-tert-butylaniline (365 mg, 1.5 mmol) in 15
ml MeOH, a filtered solution of [MoO2(acac)2] (164 mg, 0.5 mmol) in 10 ml of MeOH
was added . Color of the reaction mixture immediately turned to dark green. After one
hour, green precipitate of [Mo(tLNS)3] was filtered and recrystallized from the mixture of
dichloromethane and diethyl ether.
Yield: 320 mg (80%)
Molecular weight: 801g/mol
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C46 H71 Mo N3 O S3 % C % H % N % Mo
Calculated 62.89 7.92 5.23 11.96
Found 62.75 7.88 5.17 12.08
Fig. 9.17: IR spectrum of [Mo(tLNS)3] (11)
5 0 01 0 0 01 5 0 02 0 0 02 5 0 03 0 0 0
1 3 5 6
1 4 5 5 1 1 0 01 0 1 5 8 0 2
1 6 3 3
2 9 6 1
w a v e n u m b e r (c m -1 )
rel.
Tran
smis
sion
Chapter 9 183
[Mo(tLSS)3] (12)
To a solution of the ligand 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-benzenedithiol (127 mg, 0.5 mmol) in 15
ml MeOH, a filtered solution of [MoO2(acac)2] (54 mg, 0.17 mmol) in 10 ml of MeOH
was added . The color of the reaction mixture immediately turned to dark green. After
one hour, green precipitate of [Mo(tLSS)3] was filtered and recrystallized from the mixture
of MeCN/diethyl ether.
Yield: 119 mg (85%)
Molecular weight: 852 g/mol
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C42 H60 Mo S6 % C % H % S % Mo
Calculated 59.12 7.08 22.54 11.24
Found 58.94 6.93 21.54 10.86
Fig. 9.17: IR spectrum of [Mo(tLSS)3] (12)
5 0 01 0 0 01 5 0 02 0 0 02 5 0 03 0 0 0
8 7 1
1 3 6 3
1 5 9 6
1 6 6 4 8 6 3
1 0 3 4
1 1 1 7
2 9 6 6
re
l. Tr
ansm
issi
on
w a v e n u m b e r (c m -1 )
Experimental
184
[N(n-Bu)4][Mo(tLSS)3] (12b)
To 50 ml of a CH2Cl2 solution of [Mo(tLss)3] (85 mg, 1mmol) was added N(n-Bu)4SH
(28 mg, 1 mmol). The color immediately changed from green to olive green. The air
sensitive mixture was concentrated under vacuum and resultant solid was recrystallized
from mixture of DCM and MeCN.
Yield: - 94 mg (87%)
Molecular weight: 1094 g/mol
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C6 H99 Mo N2 S6 % C % H % S % Mo
Calculated 59.12 7.08 22.54 11.24
Found 58.94 6.93 21.54 10.86
Fig. 9.18: IR spectrum of [N(n-Bu)4] [Mo(tLSS)3] (12b)
5 0 01 0 0 01 5 0 02 0 0 02 5 0 03 0 0 0
1 0 1 41 1 3 7
8 7 7
1 3 9 01 4 7 9
1 6 4 4
2 9 7 3
rel.
Tran
smis
sion
w a v e n u m b e r (c m -1 )
Chapter 9 185
[W(tLSS)3] (13)
Tungsten hexachoride (56 mg, 0.13 mmol) was dissolved in 20 ml of CCl4 and filtered
under argon. The filtrate was then added to a solution of ligand 3,5-di-tert-butyl-1,2-
benzenedithiol (100 mg, 0.39 mmol) dissolved in about 10 ml of CCl4. As a result, a deep
blue-green color appeared to the reaction mixture. This solution was refluxed under argon
for 3 hr. and allowed to cool to room temp. The solution was filtered and filtrate was
concentrated. The residue was washed with n-pentane and vacuum dried to give a blue-
green powder. The recrystallization was done in the mixture of EtOH and diethyl ether.
Yield: 92 mg (70%)
Molecular weight: 940 g/mol
Elemental analysis:
C42 H60 S6 W % C % H % S %W
Calculated 53.60 6.42 20.43 19.53
Found 53.46 6.53 20.38 19.67
Infrared spectrum:
Fig. 9.19: IR spectrum of [W(tLSS)3] (13)
5 0 01 0 0 01 5 0 02 0 0 02 5 0 03 0 0 0
1 3 9 7 1 2 6 0
1 6 6 4
8 0 11 0 1 4
1 1 1 7
2 9 5 2
re
l. Tr
ansm
issi
on
w a v e n u m b e r (c m -1 )
Experimental
186
[N(n-Bu)4] [W(tLSS)3] (13b)
To a solution of [W(tLss)3] (96 mg, 1 mmol) in 50 ml CH2Cl2, was added N(n-Bu)4SH
(28 mg, 1 mmol) under anaerobic conditions. The color of the reaction mixture
immediately changed from green to olive green. The air sensitive mixture was
concentrated under vacuum and resulting solid compound was recrystallized from
mixture of DCM and MeCN.
Yield: 102 mg (85%)
Molecular weight: 1182 g/mol
Elemental analysis:
Infrared spectrum:
C58H96NS6W % C % H % S %W
Calculated 58.85 8.17 16.25 15.37
Found 58.91 8.23 16.47 15.55
Fig. 9.20: IR spectrum of [N(n-Bu)4] [W(tLSS)3] (13b)
5 0 01 0 0 01 5 0 02 0 0 02 5 0 03 0 0 0
2 9 6 6
1 4 7 31 6 3 7
8 0 1
1 0 2 81 1 1 0rel.
Tran
smis
sion
w a v e n u m b e r (c m -1 )
Chapter 9 187
9.2 Methods and Equipment
Unless otherwise specified, all measurements were performed at the Max
Planck Institut für Bioanorganische Chemie, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.
Commercial grade chemicals were used for the synthetic purposes and solvents were
distilled and dried before use.
Crystallography
Frau H. Schucht collected x-ray diffraction data, on a Siemens SMART
CCD diffractometer, or on an Enraf-Nonius Kappa CCD diffractometer (with or without
rotating anode). Graphite-monochromated Mo-Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) was
employed. Data were collected by the 2θ-ω scan method. The data were corrected for
absorption and Lorenz polarization effects. The structures were solved by Dr. T.
Weyhermüller, by direct methods and subsequent Fourier-difference techniques, and
refined anisotropically by full-matrix least squares on F2 with the program SHELXTL
PLUS. Hydrogen atoms were included at calculated positions with U < 0.08 Å2 in the last
cycle of refinement.
Electrochemistry
Cyclic voltammograms and square wave voltammograms were recorded
by using a EG&G potentiostat/galvanostat 273 A. A three-electrode cell was employed
with a glassy carbon working electrode, a platinum-wire auxiliary electrode and a
Ag/AgNO3 reference electrode (0.01 M AgNO3 in MeCN).
UV-vis-assisted controlled-potential coulometries were performed with
the same potentiostat, in a thermostatic 5 mm quartz cell equipped with a Pt grid as work
electrode, a Pt brush separated from the work electrode compartment by a Vycor frit as
counter-electrode, and a Ag/AgNO3 electrode (0.01 M, MeCN) as reference.
IR-assisted controlled-potential coulometries were performed, with the same potentiostat,
in an Optically Transparent Thin Layer Electrode (OTTLE) cell, built by H. Schmidt and
Dr. E. Bothe. The OTTLE cell consists of glassy carbon walls used as counter-electrode,
with CaF2 windows. In-between is a 160 µm PEEK spacer, in which are embedded a Pt
grid used as working electrode, and a silver wire used as pseudo-reference electrode.
Experimental
188
Elemental Analysis
Elemental analyses were performed by the “Microanalytisches Labor H.
Kolbe”, in Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.
EPR Spectroscopy
First derivative X-band EPR spectra of frozen solution samples were
recorded on a Bruker ESP 300 equipped with a Bruker ER 041 XK-D microwave bridge
and a Oxford Instruments 910 EPR-cryostat. The simulation of the spectra was performed
with help of the programs “ESIM/GFIT” from Dr. E. Bill and “EPR” from Dr. F. Neese.
Far-Infrared Spectroscopy
The measurements were done by the group of Dr Joris van Slageren in
Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 57, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany. The
measurements were performed on a Bruker IFS113v spectrometer equipped with a
mercury lamp as a light source, a 50 micron mylar beamsplitter, an Infrared Labs pumped
Si bolometer and a 5 mm aperture. The sample was put into an Oxford Instruments
Spectromag 4000 8 T split coil magnetic cryostats with specially enlarged mylar
windows. The spectra (typically 32 scans) were recorded on a 1 cm diameter pressed
powder pellet of the compound (160 mg) at various temperatures from 4.2 to 150 K and
magnetic fields from 0 to 7 T.
Infrared Spectroscopy
The infrared spectra were measured on a ‘Perkin-Elmer FT-IR-
Spectrophotometer 2000.’ Powder IR spectra were measured in KBr pellets with a
spectral resolution of 2 cm-1. Solution spectra were measured between NaCl windows
with different path-length spacers, or in an OTTLE cell with CaF2 windows.
Magnetic Susceptibility Measurements
The measurements of the temperature or field dependent magnetization of
the samples were performed in the range 2 to 400 K at 1, 4 or 7 T on a Quantum Design
SQUID Magnetometer. The samples were encapsulated in gelatine capsules and the
Chapter 9 189
response function was measured four times for each given temperature, yielding a total of
32 measured points. The resulting volume magnetization from the samples had its
diamagnetic contribution compensated and was recalculated as volume susceptibility.
Diamagnetic contributions were estimated for each compound with the help of
Pascal’sconstants. The experimental results were fitted with the programme JULIUS
calculating through full matrix diagonalization of the Spin-Hamiltonian.
Mass Spectrometry
All mass spectra were recorded by the group of Dr. W. Schrader at the
Max-Planck-Institut Für Kohlenforschung, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.
Mass spectra in the electron impact mode (EI; 70eV) were recorded on a
Finnigan MAT 8200 mass spectrometer. Electron Spray Interface (ESI) mass spectra
were recorded on either a Finnigan MAT 95 or a HP 5989 mass spectrometer.
UV-vis Spectroscopy
UV-Vis spectra were recorded on a HP 8452A diode array
spectrophotometer, or on a PE Lambda 19 spectrophotometer. Near-IR measurements
were performed on a Lambda 19 spectrophotometer, using Hellma Quartz Suprasil 3000
cells. The program “PeakFit-4”was used to deconvolute the spectra in Gaussian-shaped
lines. The oscillator strengths fosc were calculated by
X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy
All data were measured at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
under ring conditions of 3.0 GeV and 60-100 mA. All S K-edge data were measured
using the 54-pole wiggler beam line 6-2 in high magnetic field mode of 10 kG with a Ni-
coated harmonic rejection mirror and a fully tuned Si(111) double crystal
monochromator. Details of the optimization of this setup for low-energy studies have
Experimental
190
been described previously.6 Data were measured at room temperature by fluorescence,
using a Lytle detector. To check for reproducibility, 2-3 scans were measured for each
sample. The energy was calibrated from S K-edge spectra of Na2S2O3·5H2O, run at
intervals between sample scans. The maximum of the first pre-edge feature in the
spectrum was fixed at 2472.02 eV. A step size of 0.08 eV was used over the edge region.
Data were averaged, and a smooth background was removed from all spectra by fitting a
polynomial to the pre-edge region and subtracting this polynomial from the entire
spectrum. Normalization of the data was accomplished by fitting a flattened polynomial
or straight line to the post-edge region (2490-2740 eV) and normalizing the post-edge to
1.0. For samples containing Mo, the Mo L-edge data were collected by extending the
region file to 2810 eV and fine stepping over the Mo L3 and L2-edge regions.
Cr K-edge XAS data were measured on unfocused bend magnet beam line
2-3 or focused 16-pole wiggler beam line 9-3. A Si(220) monochromator was utilized for
energy selection. The monochromator was detuned 50% (for beam line 2-3) to minimize
higher harmonic components in the X-ray beam (for beam line 9-3 a harmonic rejection
mirror was present). All samples were prepared as solids in boron nitride, pressed into a
pellet and sealed between 38 µm Kapton tape windows in a 1 mm aluminum spacer. The
samples were maintained at 10 K during data collection using an Oxford Instruments
CF1208 continuous flow liquid helium cryostat. Data were measured in transmission
mode. Internal energy calibrations were performed by simultaneous measurement of a Cr
reference foil placed between a second and third ionization chamber. The first inflection
point was assigned to 5989.0 eV. Data represent three to five scan averages and were
processed by fitting a second order polynomial to the pre-edge region and subtracting this
background from the entire spectrum. A three-region cubic spline was used to model the
smooth background above the edge. The data were normalized by subtracting the spline
and normalizing the post-edge 1.0.
Chapter 9 191
9.3 References
1) Belostotskaya, I. S.; Komissarova, N. L.; Dzhuaryan, E. V.; Ershov, V. V. Isv.
Akad. Nauk SSSR 1984, 1610.
2) Kawamoto T., Kuma H., and Kushi Y., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1997, 1599.
3) Sellmann, D.; emig, S.; Heinmann, F. W.; Knoch, F. Z. Naturforsch. 1998, 53b,
1461.
4) Chikashita, H.; Miyazaki, M.; Itoh, K. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 1987, 699.
5) (a) Sellmann, D.; Freyberger, G.; Eberlein, R.; Böhlen, E.; Huttner, G.; Zsolnai,
L. J. Organomet. Chem. 1987, 323, 21. (b) Sellmann, D.; Käppler, O. Z. Natur-
forsch. 1987, 42b, 1291
6) Hedman, B.; Frank, P.; Gheller, S. F.; Roe, A. L.; Newton, W. E.; Hodgson, K. O.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3798.
192
Appendices
193
Appendices 1. Magnetochemical data 2. Crystallographic data
3. Curriculum Vitae
Appendices
194
1) Magnetochemical data
[As(Ph)4] [Co(LNS)2] (1)
MW = 688.15 g/mol, χdia = -364.0 x 10-6 cm3 mol-1
No T(K) µexp µcalc
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
1.967 5.121 10.245 15.067 20.009 30 40.003 50.026 60.07 70.109 80.15 90.148 100.23 110.25 120.28 130.32 140.34 150.37 160.39 170.44 180.41 190.4 200.41 210.58 220.41 230.39 240.4 250.4 260.4 270.41 280.39 290.38
0.79047 1.25546 1.746 2.07378 2.3205 2.63495 2.80582 2.90374 2.96214 2.99946 3.02519 3.02987 3.05505 3.06359 3.06974 3.07378 3.07597 3.07886 3.07944 3.0806 3.08109 3.08119 3.08164 3.08151 3.08108 3.08085 3.07958 3.08008 3.07894 3.07836 3.07859 3.07905
0.76411 1.22064 1.72858 2.05117 2.32407 2.66171 2.83012 2.91945 2.97082 3.0025 3.02325 3.03744 3.04769 3.05519 3.06089 3.06531 3.0688 3.07161 3.0739 3.07579 3.07737 3.0787 3.07983 3.08082 3.08165 3.08238 3.08303 3.08359 3.08409 3.08454 3.08494 3.0853
Appendices
195
Na [Cr3(tLNS)3(OEt)3(µ-OMe)4(OHEt)4] (3)
MW = 1279.67 g/mol, χdia = -747.0 x 10-6 cm3 mol-1
No T(K) µexp µcalc
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
1.957 5.08 10.137 15.041 20.004 30.001 40.001 50.007 60.021 70.06 80.076 90.107 100.13 110.14 120.13 130.16 140.18 150.19 160.14 170.22 180.22 190.24 200.24 210.24 220.25 230.25 240.27 250.25 260.27 270.25 280.26 290.28
2.03631 2.70312 3.31341 3.68513 3.93726 4.24369 4.41975 4.53109 4.60588 4.66161 4.70327 4.73634 4.76008 4.77903 4.79362 4.80516 4.81401 4.8132 4.82836 4.83558 4.83909 4.84172 4.84469 4.84499 4.84844 4.84883 4.84872 4.84994 4.84957 4.84879 4.84775 4.84723
1.51737 2.67159 3.37342 3.76056 4.00655 4.28975 4.44363 4.53941 4.60453 4.65168 4.68721 4.71502 4.73733 4.75561 4.77085 4.78382 4.79494 4.80459 4.81298 4.8205 4.82713 4.83308 4.8384 4.84325 4.84766 4.85168 4.85537 4.85875 4.86189 4.86479 4.86748 4.86999
Appendices
196
[Co(Cp)2] [Ni(ddbt)](5b)
MW = 672.28 g/mol, χdia = -364.0 x 10-6 cm3 mol-1
No T(K) µexp µcalc
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
1.966 5.182 10.084 15.013 20.004 30.002 40.001 50.008 60.038 70.049 80.048 90.096 100.1 110.13 120.15 130.16 140.07 150.18 160.19 170.2 180.2 190.23 200.23 210.23 220.24 230.23 240.24 250.24 260.26 270.25 280.26 290.08
1.492 1.63908 1.68302 1.69637 1.70455 1.71098 1.71452 1.7181 1.72107 1.72196 1.72176 1.7213 1.72156 1.72187 1.72244 1.72241 1.72251 1.72282 1.72326 1.72344 1.72383 1.72419 1.72438 1.7249 1.72503 1.72582 1.72547 1.72577 1.72728 1.7298 1.72876 1.73107
1.49762 1.63318 1.67827 1.69442 1.70276 1.71118 1.71542 1.71797 1.71968 1.72089 1.72181 1.72252 1.72309 1.72355 1.72394 1.72427 1.72455 1.72479 1.72501 1.7252 1.72537 1.72552 1.72565 1.72577 1.72588 1.72599 1.72608 1.72616 1.72624 1.72631 1.72638 1.72644
Appendices
197
[Co(Cp)2] [Co(ddbt)] (6b)
MW = 672.38 g/mol, χdia = -373.0 x 10-6 cm3 mol-1
No T(K) µexp µcalc
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
1.95 5.08 10 15.04 20 30 40 50 60.04 70.06 80.08 90.08 100.1 110.13 120.1 130.17 140.18 150.18 160.2 170.21 180.23 190.24 200.25 210.23 220.26 230.15 240.26 250.25 260.26 270.25 280.25 290.24
0.79212 1.26434 1.75559 2.11387 2.36558 2.66535 2.81447 2.89294 2.93992 2.96888 2.9906 3.00535 3.01555 3.02508 3.03211 3.03864 3.04421 3.04927 3.05542 3.06018 3.06535 3.06953 3.07518 3.07872 3.08274 3.08747 3.09259 3.09573 3.09954 3.10609 3.10804 3.11332
0.79010 1.26345 1.75523 2.11377 2.36543 2.66531 2.81444 2.89292 2.93989 2.96881 2.99004 3.00514 3.01521 3.02502 3.03207 3.03864 3.04421 3.04927 3.05542 3.06007 3.06425 3.06953 3.07518 3.07872 3.08274 3.08747 3.09257 3.09561 3.09823 3.10586 3.10792 3.11237
Appendices
198
[N(n-Bu)4] [Cr(tLSS)3] (8)
MW = 1050.67 g/mol, χdia = -804.0 x 10-6 cm3 mol-1
No T(K) µexp µcalc
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
1.921 5.172 9.996 15.013 20.005 30.003 39.999 50.007 60.034 70.057 80.047 90.087 100.12 110.13 120.17 130.17 140.18 150.19 160.14 170.22 180.23 190.24 200.24 210.24 220.25 230.16 240.26 250.26 260.27 270.26 280.26
1.16357 1.55078 1.63885 1.6578 1.66901 1.68636 1.68862 1.71254 1.71898 1.72532 1.73132 1.73605 1.73932 1.74211 1.7438 1.74501 1.74563 1.74617 1.74639 1.74693 1.74647 1.74595 1.74588 1.74449 1.74352 1.74422 1.74475 1.74644 1.75079 1.6997 1.73588
1.26441 1.55078 1.63828 1.67313 1.69123 1.70992 1.71948 1.72529 1.7292 1.732 1.73411 1.73575 1.73708 1.73816 1.73906 1.73982 1.74048 1.74105 1.74154 1.74198 1.74237 1.74272 1.74304 1.74332 1.74359 1.74382 1.74404 1.74424 1.74442 1.74459 1.74475
Appendices
199
[N(n-Bu)4] [CrO(tLSS)2] (9)
MW = 572 g/mol, χdia = -350.0 x 10-6 cm3 mol-1
No T(K) µexp µcalc
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
1.998 4.979 10.04 15.039 20.006 30.001 39.999 50.003 60.039 70.044 80.083 90.077 100.13 110.13 120.1 130.17 140.18 150.19 160.19 170.2 180.22 190.22 200.22 210.15 220.24 230.25 240.25 250.26 260.28 270.27 280.25 290.24
1.28456 1.41275 1.48522 1.52072 1.54941 1.59745 1.63507 1.66616 1.68848 1.70132 1.71437 1.72317 1.73034 1.73453 1.73747 1.73903 1.74016 1.73994 1.74066 1.73999 1.74047 1.74109 1.74273 1.74561 1.75079 1.75781 1.76557 1.76789 1.77124 1.77548 1.7804 1.79664
1.19313 1.38963 1.47105 1.5492 1.59309 1.64133 1.66716 1.68326 1.69428 1.70226 1.70833 1.71307 1.71692 1.72007 1.7227 1.72496 1.72689 1.72856 1.73003 1.73134 1.7325 1.73354 1.73447 1.73532 1.7361 1.7368 1.73745 1.73805 1.7386 1.73911 1.73959 1.74003
Appendices
200
[Co(Cp)2] [Cr(tLCat)3] (10b)
MW = 901 g/mol, χdia = -754.0 x 10-6 cm3 mol-1
No T(K) µexp µcalc
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
2.001 5.003 10.016 15.014 20.006 29.998 40 50.01 60.037 70.033 80.081 90.093 100.15 110.13 120.16 130.17 140.04 150.19 160.21 170.21 180.23 190.23 200.22 210.26 220.15 230.22 240.25 250.27 260.08 270.26 280.25 290.25
1.55684 1.66063 1.71827 1.72622 1.73145 1.73482 1.73478 1.73588 1.73588 1.73714 1.74138 1.73908 1.73832 1.73726 1.73664 1.73584 1.73502 1.73484 1.7348 1.73461 1.73487 1.73509 1.73538 1.73709 1.73748 1.73922 1.73926 1.73940 1.73942 1.73944 1.73947 1.73950
1.61756 1.69384 1.71775 1.72541 1.72919 1.73292 1.73478 1.73588 1.73662 1.73714 1.73754 1.73784 1.73809 1.73829 1.73845 1.73859 1.73871 1.73882 1.73891 1.73899 1.73906 1.73912 1.73918 1.73923 1.73928 1.73932 1.73936 1.73942 1.73943 1.73946 1.73949 1.73952
Appendices
201
[N(n-bu)4] [Mo(tLSS)3] (12b)
MW = 1094 g/mol, χdia = -780.0 x 10-6 cm3 mol-1
No T(K) µexp µcalc
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
1.951 5.079 9.996 15.056 20.004 30 40.005 50.014 60.037 70.061 80.068 90.1 100.11 110.12 120.14 130.16 140.18 150.19 160.2 170.21 180.22 190.24 200.24 210.23 220.25 230.04 240.25 250.25 260.28 270.26 280.26 290.27
1.50923 1.66185 1.68516 1.69501 1.6996 1.70508 1.71042 1.71202 1.71485 1.7177 1.7207 1.72381 1.72526 1.72707 1.72788 1.7287 1.72729 1.72642 1.72292 1.71936 1.71805 1.71638 1.7164 1.71776 1.71785 1.71645 1.71573 1.71550 1.71397 1.71298 1.71444 1.71533
1.57368 1.66132 1.68761 1.69656 1.7009 1.70526 1.70743 1.70873 1.7096 1.71022 1.71068 1.71104 1.71133 1.71156 1.71176 1.71192 1.71206 1.71219 1.71229 1.71239 1.71247 1.71255 1.71262 1.71268 1.71273 1.71278 1.71345 1.71301 1.71324 1.71317 1.71356 1.71408
Appendices
202
[N(n-Bu)4] [W(tLSS)3] (13b)
MW = 1182 g/mol, χdia = -873.0 x 10-6 cm3 mol-1
No T(K) µexp µcalc
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
1.927 5.144 9.985 15.012 20.005 29.998 40.003 50.015 60.037 70.045 80.074 90.113 100.13 110.13 120.16 130.17 140.18 150.19 160.21 170.22 180.23 190.24 200.25 210.24 220.25 230.25 240.25 250.28 260.26 270.25 280.25 290.16
1.57899 1.6299 1.6621 1.66635 1.67189 1.67725 1.68248 1.68687 1.6887 1.68906 1.69095 1.6907 1.69075 1.69075 1.69075 1.68334 1.68014 1.67473 1.67094 1.66426 1.6581 1.64925 1.63948 1.62935 1.61797 1.60408 1.58415 1.56673 1.15341 1.52502 1.50877 1.50217
1.57141 1.64856 1.66895 1.67588 1.67924 1.68257 1.68421 1.68519 1.68584 1.6863 1.68665 1.68692 1.68714 1.68731 1.68746 1.68758 1.68769 1.68778 1.68786 1.68793 1.68799 1.68805 1.6881 1.68815 1.68818 1.68822 1.68826 1.68829 1.68832 1.68834 1.68837 1.68839
Appendices
203
2) Crystallographic data
(1) (2)
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature
Wavelength (MoKα)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
Volume (Å3), Z
Density (calc.) Mg/m3
Absorption coeff
F(000)
Crystal size (mm)
θ Range for data collect.
Index range
Reflections collected
Independent reflect.
Absorption correction
Data/restraints/param.
Goodness -of-fit on F2
Final R indices
[I>2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
C36 H30 As Co N2 S2
688.59
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Tetragonal
P4 1
a = 9.8486(6) Å
b = 9.8486(6) Å
c = 31.672(2) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 90.00 deg
γ = 90.00 deg
3072.0(3)
1.489 Mg/m3
1.792 mm-1
1408
0.34 x 0.26 x 0.22
3.90 to 30.94 deg.
-13<=h<=14
-14<=k<=14
-38<=l<=45
33228
8491 [R(int) =0.0383]
Not corrected
8491/7/404
1.128
R1 = 0.0433,
wR2 = 0.0799
R1 = 0.0515
wR2 = 0.0827
C28 H46 Co N3 S2
547.73
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Monoclinic
P2 1/n
a = 13.2840(3) Å
b = 16.1915 (5) Å
c = 13.6370(4) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 98.972 deg
γ = 90.00 deg
2897.26(14)
1.256 Mg/m3
0.757 mm-1
1176
0.42 x 0.08 x 0.08
2.94 to 30.00 deg.
-18<=h<=18
-22<=k<=22
-19<=l<=19
65433
8447 [R(int) =0.0596]
Gaussian, face-indexed
8447/1/320
1.060
R1 = 0.0410,
wR2 = 0.0816
R1 = 0.0575,
wR2 = 0.0877
Appendices
204
(3) (4a) + (4b) Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature
Wavelength (MoKα)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
Volume (Å3), Z
Density (calc.) Mg/m3
Absorption coeff
F(000)
Crystal size (mm)
θ Range for data collect.
Index range
Reflections collected
Independent reflect.
Absorption correction
Data/restraints/param.
Goodness-of-fit on F2
Final R indices
[I>2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
C58 H105 Cr3 N3 Na O10 S3
1279.62
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Trigonal
R3c
a = 22.149(2) Å
b = 22.149(2) Å
c = 46.029(4) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 90.00 deg
γ = 120.00 deg
19556 (3), 12
1.304
0.649 mm-1
8220
0.20 x 0.10 x 0.06
1.84 to 23.50 deg.
-29<=h<=29
-29<=k<=29
-57<=l<=65
20785
6416 [R(int) =0.0785]
Not corrected
6387 / 150 / 495
1.071
R1 = 0.0631,
wR2 = 0.1221
R1 = 0.0982
wR2 = 0.1882
C101 H186 Cr6 N6 Na2 O20 S6
2354.90
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Trigonal
R3c
a = 22.1675(6) Å
b = 22.1675 (6) Å
c = 44.509(2) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 90.00 deg
γ = 120.00 deg
18941.4(11), 6
1.239
0.664mm-1
7536
0.22 x 0.11 x 0.11
2.84 to 28.50 deg.
-29<=h<=29
-29<=k<=29
-59<=l<=59
89330
10658 [R(int) =0.0596]
Gaussian, face-indexed
10658 /143 / 472
1.098
R1 = 0.0446,
wR2 = 0.0934
R1 = 0.0516,
wR2 = 0.0964
Appendices
205
(5) (5b)
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature
Wavelength (MoKα)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
Volume (Å3), Z
Density (calc.) Mg/m3
Absorption coeff
F(000)
Crystal size (mm)
θ Range for data collect.
Index range
Reflections collected
Independent reflect.
Absorption correction
Data/restraints/param.
Goodness -of-fit on F2
Final R indices
[I>2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
C26 H20 N2 Ni S2
483.27
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Monoclinic
P2 (1)/n
a = 8.4938(3) Å
b = 24.0875(8) Å
c = 10.7572(4) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 102.09(1) deg
γ = 90.00 deg
2152.05(15), 4
1.492 mm-1
1.112
1000
0.33 x 0.17 x 0.06
4.18 to 31.03 deg.
-12<=h<=12
-34<=k<=34
-15<=l<=15
74726
6861 [R(int) =0.03851]
Gaussian, face-indexed
6861 / 0 / 288
1.073
R1 = 0.0275
wR2 = 0.0693
R1 = 0.0308
wR2 = 0.0710
C36 H30 Co N2 Ni S2
672.38
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Monoclinic
C2 / c
a = 16.3388(6) Å
b = 10.2331(4) Å
c = 18.2833(6) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 110.28(1) deg
γ = 90.00 deg
2863.41(18), 4
1.558 mm-1
1.411
1388
0.24 x 0.10 x 0.10
3.03 to 31.52 deg.
-24<=h<=24
-15<=k<=15
-26<=l<=26
37260
4760 [R(int) =0.0633]
Gaussian, face-indexed
4760 / 0 / 192
1.055
R1 = 0.0257,
wR2 = 0.0637
R1 = 0.0361
wR2 = 0.0668
Appendices
206
(6) (6b)
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature
Wavelength (MoKα)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
Volume (Å3), Z
Density (calc.) Mg/m3
Absorption coeff
F(000)
Crystal size (mm)
θ Range for data collect.
Index range
Reflections collected
Independent reflect.
Absorption correction
Data/restraints/param.
Goodness -of-fit on F2
Final R indices
[I>2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
C26 H20 Co N2 S2
483.49
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Monoclinic
P2 (1)/n
a = 8.4252(3) Å
b = 24.2702(9) Å
c = 10.7163(4) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 101.48(1) deg
γ = 90.00 deg
2147.44(14), 4
1.495 mm-1
1.010
996
0.22 x 0.04 x 0.03
3.82 to 30.96 deg.
-11<=h<=12
-35<=k<=35
-15<=l<=15
34574
6805 [R(int) =0.0746]
Gaussian, face-indexed
6805/0/288
1.074
R1 = 0.0486,
wR2 = 0.0883
R1 = 0.0720
wR2 = 0.0961
C36 H30 Co2 N2 S2* 0.5
CH3CN
693.13
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Monoclinic
P2 (1)/c
a = 10.1342(5) Å
b = 17.186(2) Å
c = 17.838(2) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 91.67(2) deg
γ = 90.00 deg
3105.5(5), 4
1.483 mm-1
1.234
1428
0.20 x 0.20 x 0.15
4.57 to 31.00 deg.
-14<=h<=14
-24<=k<=24
-25<=l<=25
82019
9798 [R(int) =0.0633]
Gaussian, face-indexed
9798 / 3 / 398
1.194
R1 = 0.0841,
wR2 = 0.2363
R1 = 0.0922
wR2 = 0.2406
Appendices
207
(7)
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature
Wavelength (MoKα)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
Volume (Å3), Z
Density (calc.) Mg/m3
Absorption coeff
F(000)
Crystal size (mm)
θ Range for data collect.
Index range
Reflections collected
Independent reflect.
Absorption correction
Data/restraints/param.
Goodness -of-fit on F2
Final R indices
[I>2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
C26 H20 N2 S2 Zn
489.93
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Monoclinic
P2 1/c
a = 26.5572(6) Å
b = 7.0143(1) Å
c = 26.6855(4) Å
α = 90.00 (1) deg
β = 118.65(1) deg
γ = 90.00 (1) deg
4362.4(2), 8
1.492 mm-1
1.334
2016
0.15 x 0.08 x 0.07
3.16 to 31.56 deg.
-39<=h<=39
-10<=k<=10
-39<=l<=39
125768
14548 [R(int) =0.0641]
Not corrected
14548 / 0 / 559
1.065
R1 = 0.0365,
wR2 = 0.0718
R1 = 0.0483
wR2 = 0.0762
Appendices
208
(8) (9) Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature
Wavelength (MoKα)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
Volume (Å3), Z
Density (calc.) Mg/m3
Absorption coeff
F(000)
Crystal size (mm)
θ Range for data collect.
Index range
Reflections collected
Independent reflect.
Absorption correction
Data/restraints/param.
Goodness -of-fit on F2
Final R indices
[I>2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
C58 H96 Cr N S6
1051.72
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Monoclinic
P2 (1)/c
a = 14.4072(8) Å
b = 21.579(2) Å
c = 20.1333(12) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 90.703(5) deg
γ = 90.00 deg
6258.8(8), 4
1.116 mm-1
0.417
2284
0.14 x 0.12 x 0.05
3.40 to 24.00 deg.
-16<=h<=16
-24<=k<=24
-22<=l<=23
38236
9790 [R(int) =0.10015]
Not corrected
9790 / 0 / 617
1.059
R1 = 0.0685
wR2 = 0.1358
R1 = 0.1212
wR2 = 0.1605
C56 H66 As Cr N2 O S4
1038.27
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Monoclinic
P2 (1)/n
a = 10.0423(6) Å
b = 19.7433(12) Å
c = 26.800(2) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 96.93(1) deg
γ = 90.00 deg
5274.8(6), 4
1.307 mm-1
1.038
2180
0.10 x 0.10 x 0.04
4.02 to 25.00 deg.
-11<=h<=11
-23<=k<=23
-28<=l<=31
45009
9203 [R(int) =0.0953]
Gaussian, face-indexed
9203 / 6 / 613
1.202
R1 = 0.09982,
wR2 = 0.2040
R1 = 0.1240
wR2 = 0.2149
Appendices
209
(10) Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature
Wavelength (MoKα)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
Volume (Å3), Z
Density (calc.) Mg/m3
Absorption coeff
F(000)
Crystal size (mm)
θ Range for data collect.
Index range
Reflections collected
Independent reflect.
Absorption correction
Data/restraints/param.
Goodness-of-fit on F2
Final R indices
[I>2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
C42 H60 Cr N3 O6
712.90
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Monoclinic
C2 / c
a = 22.1182(9) Å
b = 19.1114(9) Å
c = 10.0921(3) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 95.184(5) deg
γ = 90.00 deg
4248.6 (3), 4
1.115
0.310 mm-1
1536
0.10 x 0.07 x 0.02
4.05 to 25.00 deg.
-24<=h<=26
-22<=k<=22
-10<=l<=12
13998
3727 [R(int) =0.1032]
Not corrected
3727 / 0 / 222
1.058
R1 = 0.0578,
wR2 = 0.1020
R1 = 0.1112
wR2 = 0.1252
Appendices
210
(11) (12) Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature
Wavelength (MoKα)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
Volume (Å3), Z
Density (calc.) Mg/m3
Absorption coeff
F(000)
Crystal size (mm)
θ Range for data collect.
Index range
Reflections collected
Independent reflect.
Absorption correction
Data/restraints/param.
Goodness-of-fit on F2
Final R indices
[I>2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
C46 H73 Mo N3 O S3
876.19
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Monoclinic
P2 1 / n
a = 13.8156(7) Å
b = 20.8414(9) Å
c = 16.5381(8) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 92.154(4) deg
γ = 90.00 deg
4758.6 (4), 4
1.223
0.442 mm-1
1872
0.18 x 0.11 x 0.06
2.95 to 26.00 deg.
-17<=h<=17
-25<=k<=25
-20<=l<=20
58033
9327 [R(int) =0.0846]
Gaussian
9327/ 21 / 529
1.155
R1 = 0.0546,
wR2 = 0.1115
R1 = 0.0686
wR2 = 0.1177
C42 H60 Mo S6
853.20
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Monoclinic
P2 1 / n
a = 13.3491(6) Å
b = 18.5592(8) Å
c = 19.3158(6) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 99.663(5) deg
γ = 90.00 deg
4717.6 (19), 4
1.201
0.569 mm-1
1800
0.10 x 0.09 x 0.02
2.99 to 30.98 deg.
-19<=h<=19
-26<=k<=26
-27<=l<=27
111338
14979 [R(int) =0.0617]
Not corrected
14979 / 31 / 489
1.027
R1 = 0.0389,
wR2 = 0.0756
R1 = 0.0648
wR2 = 0.0855
Appendices
211
(12b) (13) Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature
Wavelength (MoKα)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
Volume (Å3), Z
Density (calc.) Mg/m3
Absorption coeff
F(000)
Crystal size (mm)
θ Range for data collect.
Index range
Reflections collected
Independent reflect.
Absorption correction
Data/restraints/param.
Goodness-of-fit on F2
Final R indices
[I>2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
C60 H99 Mo N2 S6
1136.71
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Monoclinic
P2 1 / c
a = 14.5012(6) Å
b = 21.7374(9) Å
c = 20.2212(4) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 90.563(5) deg
γ = 90.00 deg
6373.8 (5), 4
1.185
0.438 mm-1
2444
0.24 x 0.07 x 0.06
3.30 to 27.50 deg.
-18<=h<=18
-28<=k<=28
-26<=l<=26
83077
14617 [R(int) =0.0752]
Gaussian, face-indexed
14617 / 1 / 627
1.111
R1 = 0.0546,
wR2 = 0.1004
R1 = 0.0762
wR2 = 0.1074
C42 H60 S6 W
961.64
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Monoclinic
P2 1 / n
a = 10.7227(5) Å
b = 18.7101(6) Å
c = 23.7213(6) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 94.045(1) deg
γ = 90.00 deg
4747.18 (17), 4
1.346
2.725 mm-1
1972
0.28 x 0.17 x 0.04
2.98 to 26.35 deg.
-13<=h<=13
-23<=k<=23
-29<=l<=29
90719
4997 [R(int) =0.0491]
Gaussian, face-indexed
4997 / 34 / 292
1.133
R1 = 0.0340,
wR2 = 0.0774
R1 = 0.0358
wR2 = 0.0786
Appendices
212
(13b) Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature
Wavelength (MoKα)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
Volume (Å3), Z
Density (calc.) Mg/m3
Absorption coeff
F(000)
Crystal size (mm)
θ Range for data collect.
Index range
Reflections collected
Independent reflect.
Absorption correction
Data/restraints/param.
Goodness-of-fit on F2
Final R indices
[I>2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
C58 H96 N S6 W *0.19 CH2Cl2
1199.49
100(2)K
0.71073Å
Monoclinic
P2 1 / c
a = 14.5159(8) Å
b = 21.949(2) Å
c = 20.174(2) Å
α = 90.00 deg
β = 91.68(1) deg
γ = 90.00 deg
6424.9 (9), 4
1.240
2.042 mm-1
2516
0.10 x 0.05 x 0.02
2.96 to 22.50 deg.
-15<=h<=15
-21<=k<=23
-21<=l<=19
28186
8319 [R(int) = 0.0698]
Gaussian, face-indexed
8319 / 13 / 617
1.089
R1 = 0.0510,
wR2 = 0.0881
R1 = 0.0860,
wR2 = 0.0995
Appendices
213
3) Curriculum Vitae
Personal
Name: Ms. Kapre, Ruta
Date of Birth:
20.12.1977
Place of Birth:
Medha, Maharashtra, India
Nationality:
Indian
Education
1994-1997 Sangamner college, Pune University, India (Bachlor of science)
1997-1999 Department of Chemistry, Pune University, India (Master of Science, with Prof. Dr. R. S. Kusurkar).
Apr1999-Dec 2000 National Chemical Lab (CSIR), Pune, India Project assistant
Feb 2001-July 2002 Ruhr University Bochum, Germany (Project assistant with Prof. M. Driess)
Aug 2002-July 2005 Max-Planck-Institute for Bioinorganic Chemistry, Muelheim an der Ruhr, Germany (Phd with Prof. Dr. K. Wieghardt).